Stretching Entity Resources for Vulnerable Communities Act
A BILL
To amend the Public Health Service Act to clarify the intent of the 340B program and provide for enhanced 340B program integrity, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Sense of Congress related to purpose of the 340B Program
Sec. 3 Codifying definition of patient under 340B program
“(3) Patient
“(A) In general—For purposes of carrying out this section, the term patient shall have the definition given to such term on pages 55156 through 55158 of title 61 of the Federal Register published on October 24, 1996.
“(B) Clarification—For purposes of this section, the Secretary shall not implement the definition under subparagraph (A) more narrowly than the definition specified in subparagraph (A), including by limiting the application of the definition to particular individuals based on their insurance status.”
Sec. 4 Non-discrimination with respect to covered entities
“(f) Non-Discrimination with respect to covered entities
“(1) Terms of agreement—Subject to paragraph (3), no entity that reimburses a covered entity or its contract pharmacy for drugs that are subject to an agreement under this section may discriminate against such covered entity with respect to the terms of such reimbursement, including terms relating to the level and amount of reimbursement, on the basis that the covered entity participates in the program under this section.
“(2) Patient’s choice—With respect to a patient eligible to receive drugs that are subject to an agreement under this section from a covered entity or its contract pharmacy, no entity that makes payment for such drugs shall discriminate against the covered entity or its contract pharmacy in a manner that prevents or interferes with the patient’s choice to receive such drugs from the covered entity or contract pharmacy.
“(3) Exception—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to States with respect to retail drugs that are reimbursed by the State on a fee-for-service basis pursuant to a State plan approved under title XIX of the Social Security Act.”
Sec. 5 Program integrity
“(v) Selective auditing of manufacturers and wholesalers to ensure the integrity of the drug discount program under this section, consistent with the following:
“(I) Such audits shall be conducted in a form and manner that, to the greatest extent practicable, results in parity between such audits and audits under subsection (a)(5)(C) of covered entities, as measured by comparing the percentage of total manufacturer audits under this clause to the percentage of total audits conducted under such subsection of covered entities described in subsection (a)(4)(L).
“(II) Such audits shall include review of average manufacturer price, best price, and the inflationary penalty to ensure that manufacturers are calculating the ceiling price accurately.”
“(II) shall not exceed, for each instance of overcharging a covered entity that may have occurred, the greater of—
“(aa) $5,000; or
“(bb) 200 percent of the amount of such overcharge; and”
“(C) Clarifications—For purposes of subparagraph (B)(vi)—
“(i) an instance of overcharging described in subclause (II) of such subparagraph shall—
“(I) apply to each unit of a national drug code within an order, whether placed directly with a manufacturer or through a wholesaler, authorized distributor, or agent, and may not be offset by other discounts provided on any other National Drug Code or discounts provided on the same National Drug Code on other transactions, orders or purchases; and
“(II) include a manufacturer’s failure, such as through a limited distribution network, to offer a covered outpatient drug to a covered entity at the 340B ceiling price to the same extent the manufacturer makes the drug available to non-340B providers, unless such action is taken to narrowly address an actual or imminent shortage and has been approved in advance by the Secretary pursuant to standards issued through an appropriate policy or regulatory issuance; and
“(ii) in applying subclause (III) of such subparagraph—
“(I) the term knowingly shall have the meaning given the term should know in section 1003.101 of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation); and
“(II) the term intentionally means, with respect to an overcharge, that such overcharge is not due to inadvertent error.”
“(vii) The requirement that the applicable ceiling price described in clause (iii) for a covered outpatient drug, with respect to a calendar quarter, shall be equal to the average manufacturer price under section 1927(k)(1) of the Social Security Act from the preceding calendar quarter for the smallest unit of measure minus the unit rebate amount and will be calculated using six decimal places and will be published by the Secretary rounded to two decimal places, in accordance with the following:
“(I) In the case that the ceiling price calculation results in an amount less than $0.01, the ceiling price will be $0.01.
“(II) For a new covered outpatient drug—
“(aa) manufacturers shall estimate the ceiling price as of the date the new drug is first available for sale;
“(bb) the estimation shall be calculated as wholesale acquisition cost minus the appropriate rebate percentage until an average manufacturer price is available, which shall occur no later than the 4th quarter that the drug is available for sale; and
“(cc) manufacturers shall calculate the actual ceiling price and shall offer to refund or credit the covered entity the difference between the estimated ceiling price and the actual ceiling price within 120 days of the determination by the manufacturer involved that an overcharge occurred.
“(viii) The prohibition against discriminatory distribution of drugs, consistent with the following:
“(I) A manufacturer shall make available each covered outpatient drug to covered entities on the same terms and conditions that the covered outpatient drug is offered to purchasers that are not covered entities except that the manufacturer will charge the covered entity for the covered outpatient drug at or below the ceiling price.
“(II) If the Secretary finds, after audit as described in subparagraph (B)(v) and after notice and hearing, that a manufacturer is in violation of the requirement described in subclause (I), the manufacturer shall be liable to the covered entity that was not able to purchase the covered outpatient drug involved at a discounted price in an amount equal to the reduction in the price of the drug provided under the agreement between the entity and the manufacturer under this section.”
Sec. 6 Including programs funded under the Community Mental Health Services Block Grant or the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant as covered entities
“(P) A program carried out through funds received under a grant under the Community Mental Health Services Block Grant or the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant under part B of title XIX.”