S. 3346 — what changed
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016
From Reported in Senate to Engrossed in Senate.
26 sections amended, 47 added, and 12 removed between Reported in Senate and Engrossed in Senate.
In this Act:
(1)
Administration— The term Administration means the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
(2)
Administrator— The term Administrator means the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
(3)
Appropriate committees of Congress— The term appropriate committees of Congress means—
(A)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.
(4)
Cis-lunar space— The term cis-lunar space means the region of space from the Earth out to and including the region around the surface of the Moon.
(5)
Deep space— The term deep space means the region of space beyond low-Earth orbit, to include cis-lunar space.
(6)
Government astronaut— The term government astronaut has the meaning given the term in section 50902 of title 51, United States Code.
(7)
ISS— The term ISS means the International Space Station.
(8)
ISS management entity— The term ISS management entity means the organization with which the Administrator has a cooperative agreement under section 504(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18354(a)).
(9)
NASA— The term NASA means the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
(10)
Orion— The term Orion means the multipurpose crew vehicle described under section 303 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18323).
(11)
Space Launch System— The term Space Launch System has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18302).
(12)
added
United States government astronaut— The term United States government astronaut has the meaning given the term government astronaut in section 50902 of title 51, United States Code, except it does not include an individual who is an international partner astronaut.
Sec. 101
Fiscal year 2017
There are authorized to be appropriated to NASA for fiscal year 2017, $19,508,000,000, as follows:
(1)
changed
For Exploration, $4,532,000,000.$4,330,000,000.
(2)
changed
For Space Operations, $4,950,700,000.$5,023,000,000.
(3)
changed
For Science, $5,395,000,000.$5,500,000,000.
(4)
changed
For Aeronautics, $601,000,000.$640,000,000.
(5)
changed
For Space Technology, $686,500,000.$686,000,000.
(6)
changed
For Education, $108,000,000.$115,000,000.
(7)
changed
For Safety, Security, and Mission Services, $2,796,700,000.$2,788,600,000.
(8)
changed
For Construction and Environmental Compliance and Restoration, $400,000,000.$388,000,000.
(9)
changed
For Inspector General, $38,100,000.$37,400,000.
Sec. 201
Sense of Congress on sustaining national space commitments
added
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
honoring current national space commitments and building upon investments in space across successive Administrations demonstrates clear continuity of purpose by the United States, in collaboration with its international, academic, and industry partners, to extend humanity’s reach into deep space, including cis-lunar space, the Moon, the surface and moons of Mars, and beyond;
(2)
added
NASA leaders can best leverage investments in the United States space program by continuing to develop a balanced portfolio for space exploration and space science, including continued development of the Space Launch System, Orion, Commercial Crew Program, space and planetary science missions such as the James Webb Space Telescope, Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope, and Europa mission, and ongoing operations of the ISS and Commercial Resupply Services Program;
(3)
added
a national, government-led space program that builds on current science and exploration programs, advances human knowledge and capabilities, and opens the frontier beyond Earth for ourselves, commercial enterprise, and science, and with our international partners, is of critical importance to our national destiny and to a future guided by United States values and freedoms;
(a)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
the United States, in collaboration with its international, academic, and industry partners, should sustain and build upon our national space commitments and investments across Administrations with a continuity of purpose to advance recent achievements of space exploration and space science to extend humanity’s reach into deep space, including cis-lunar space, the Moon, the surface and moons of Mars, and beyond;
(2)
removed
NASA leaders can best leverage investments in the United States space program by continuing to develop a balanced portfolio for space exploration and space science, including continued development of the Space Launch System, Orion, Commercial Crew and Commercial Resupply Services, the James Webb Space Telescope, and the ongoing operations of the International Space Station;
(3)
removed
a national, government-led space program that builds on current science and exploration programs and advances human knowledge and capabilities and opens the frontier beyond Earth for ourselves, our international partners, commercial enterprise, and science is of critical importance to our national destiny and to a future guided by United States values and freedoms;
(4)
renumbered
was (2)(6)
continuity of purpose and effective execution of core NASA programs are essential for efficient use of resources in pursuit of timely and tangible accomplishments;
(5)
renumbered
was (2)(7)
NASA could improve its efficiency and effectiveness by working with industry to streamline existing programs and requirements, procurement practices, institutional footprint, and bureaucracy while preserving effective program oversight, accountability, and safety;
(6)
added
it is imperative that the United States maintain and enhance its leadership in space exploration and space science, and continue to expand freedom and economic opportunities in space for all Americans that are consistent with the Constitution of the United States; and
(7)
added
NASA should be a multi-mission space agency, and should have a balanced and robust set of core missions in space science, space technology, aeronautics, human space flight and exploration, and education.
(6)
removed
United States Government astronauts changed the trajectory of human history toward the promise of the stars, and it is imperative that the United States maintain and enhance its leadership in space exploration and continue to expand freedom and opportunities in space for all Americans that are consistent with the Constitution of the United States; and
(7)
removed
NASA is and should remain a multimission agency with a balanced and robust set of core missions in science, space technology, aeronautics, human space flight and exploration, and education.
added
Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added
Returns on the Nation's investments in science, technology, and exploration accrue over decades-long timeframes, and a disruption of such investments could prevent returns from being fully realized.
(2)
added
Past challenges to the continuity of such investments, particularly threats regarding the cancellation of authorized programs with bipartisan and bicameral support, have disrupted completion of major space systems thereby—
(A)
added
impeding planning and pursuit of national objectives in space science and human space exploration;
(B)
added
placing such investments in space science and space exploration at risk; and
(a)
removed
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
removed
Challenges of the past, such as the cancellation of major programs, have disrupted completion of major space systems thereby—
(A)
removed
impeding planning and pursuit of national objectives in human space exploration;
(B)
removed
placing the Nation’s investment in space exploration at risk; and
(C)
renumbered
was (2)(3)(4)
degrading the aerospace industrial base.
(3)
added
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155; 119 Stat. 2895), National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–422; 122 Stat. 4779), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301 et seq.) reflect a broad, bipartisan agreement on the path forward for NASA's core missions in science, space technology, aeronautics, human space flight and exploration, and education, that serves as the foundation for the policy updates by this Act.
(4)
added
Sufficient investment and maximum utilization of the ISS and ISS National Laboratory with our international and industry partners is—
(2)
removed
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301 et seq.) reflects a broad, bipartisan agreement on the path forward for NASA's core missions in science, space technology, aeronautics, human space flight and exploration, and education, which serves as the foundation for the policy updates by this Act.
(3)
removed
Sustaining the investment and maximizing utilization of the ISS and ISS National Laboratory with our international and industry partners is—
(A)
renumbered
was (2)(5)(2)
consistent with the goals and objectives of the United States space program; and
(B)
renumbered
was (2)(5)(3)
imperative to continuing United States global leadership in human space exploration, science, research, technology development, and education opportunities that contribute to development of the next generation of American scientists, engineers, and leaders, and to creating the opportunity for economic development of low-Earth orbit.
(5)
added
NASA has made measurable progress in the development and testing of the Space Launch System and Orion exploration systems with the near-term objectives of the initial integrated test flight and launch in 2018, a human mission in 2021, and continued missions with an annual cadence in cis-lunar space and eventually to the surface of Mars.
(6)
added
The Commercial Crew Program has made measurable progress toward reestablishing the capability to launch United States government astronauts from United States soil into low-Earth orbit by the end of 2018.
(4)
removed
NASA has made measurable progress in development and testing of the Space Launch System and Orion exploration systems with the near-term objectives of the initial integrated test flight and launch in 2018, a human mission in 2021, and continued missions in cis-lunar space and eventually to the surface of Mars.
(5)
removed
The Commercial Crew Program is on schedule to reestablish the capability to launch United States government astronauts from United States soil into orbit by the end of 2018.
(7)
renumbered
was (2)(8)
The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, in its 2015 Annual Report, urged continuity of purpose noting concerns over the potential for cost overruns and schedule slips that could accompany significant changes to core NASA programs.
Sec. 301
Operation of the ISS
(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
after 15 years of continuous human presence in low-Earth orbit, the ISS continues to overcome challenges and operate safely;
(2)
changed
expansion of partnerships, scientific research, commercial applications, and exploration testbed capabilities of the ISS is essential to ensuring the greatest return on investments made by the United States and its international a unique testbed for future space partners in the exploration systems development, assembly, and operations of that unique facility;including long-duration space travel;
(3)
changed
stable and successful Commercial Cargo the expansion of partnerships, scientific research, and Commercial Crew programs are critical to ensuring timely provisioning commercial applications of the ISS and is essential to reestablishing ensuring the capability to launch United States government astronauts from greatest return on investments made by the United States soil into orbit;and its international space partners in the development, assembly, and operations of that unique facility;
(4)
changed
sustaining utilization of the ISS will sustain United States leadership and progress in human space exploration is enabled by continuing utilization of the ISS—by—
(A)
changed
to facilitate facilitating the commercialization and economic development of low-Earth orbit;
(B)
changed
to serve serving as a testbed for technologies, technologies and to conduct a platform for scientific research and development; and
(C)
changed
serving as an orbital facility enabling research upon—
(i)
the health, well-being, and performance of humans in space; and
(ii)
changed
the development of in-space systems enabling human space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit;orbit; and
(5)
changed
the Administrator should continue to support the development of the Commercial Crew Program as planned to end reliance upon Russian transport of United States government astronauts to the ISS which has not been possible since the retirement of the Space Shuttle program provides a platform for fundamental, microgravity, discovery-based space life and physical sciences research that is critical for enabling space exploration, protecting humans in 2011; andspace, increasing pathways for commercial space development that depend on advances in basic research, and contributes to advancing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics research.
(6)
removed
the ISS should continue to provide a platform for fundamental, microgravity, discovery-based space life and physical sciences research that is critical for enabling space exploration, protecting humans in space, increasing pathways for commercial space development that depend on advances in basic research, and contribute to advancing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics research.
(b)
changed
Continuation of the ISS—Objectives— Congress reaffirms the policy set forth in section 501 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18351) that it shall be the policy of the United States, in consultation with its international partners in the ISS program, to support full and complete utilization The primary objectives of the ISS through at least 2024.program shall be—
(1)
added
to achieve the long term goal and objectives under section 202 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18312); and
(2)
added
to pursue a research program that advances knowledge and provides other benefits to the Nation.
(c)
added
Continuation of the ISS— Section 501 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18351) is amended to read as follows:
added
“501. Continuation of the International Space Station
added
“(a) Policy of the United States—It shall be the policy of the United States, in consultation with its international partners in the ISS program, to support full and complete utilization of the ISS through at least 2024.
added
“(b) NASA action—In furtherance of the policy set forth in subsection (a), NASA shall—
added
“(1) pursue international, commercial, and intragovernmental means to maximize ISS logistics supply, maintenance, and operational capabilities, reduce risks to ISS systems sustainability, and offset and minimize United States operations costs relating to the ISS;
added
“(2) utilize, to the extent practicable, the ISS for the development of capabilities and technologies needed for the future of human space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit; and
added
“(3) utilize, if practical and cost effective, the ISS for Science Mission Directorate missions in low-Earth orbit.”
Sec. 302
Transportation to ISS
(a)
changed
Sense of Congress on commercial crew and commercial cargo programs—Findings— It Congress finds that reliance on foreign carriers for United States crew transfer is unacceptable, and the sense of Congress that—Nation’s human space flight program must acquire the capability to launch United States government astronauts on vehicles using United States rockets from United States soil as soon as is safe, reliable, and affordable to do so.
(1)
removed
NASA should build upon the success of the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services and Commercial Resupply Services programs that have allowed private sector companies to partner with NASA to deliver cargo and scientific experiments to the ISS since 2012;
(2)
removed
once certified to meet NASA’s safety and reliability requirements and fully operational to meet ISS crew transfer needs, the Commercial Crew Program transportation systems should serve as the primary means of transporting United States government astronauts and international partner astronauts from United States soil to and from the ISS;
(3)
removed
Commercial Crew Program transportation systems should have the capability of serving as ISS emergency crew rescue vehicles;
(4)
removed
the 21st Century Launch Complex Program has enabled significant modernization and infrastructure improvements as launch sites across the United States to support NASA's Commercial Resupply Services and other civil and commercial space flight missions; and
(5)
removed
the 21st Century Launch Complex Program should be continued in a manner that leverages State and private investments to achieve the goals of the program.
(b)
changed
United States policy—Sense of Congress on Commercial Crew Program and Commercial Resupply Services Program— It is the policy of the United States that, to foster the competitive development, operation, improvement and commercial availability of space transportation services, services for Federal Government access to and return from the ISS, whenever practicable, shall be procured via fair and open competition for well-defined, milestone-based, Federal Acquisition Regulation-based contracts under section 201(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act sense of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18311(a)).Congress that—
(1)
added
once developed and certified to meet the Administration’s safety and reliability requirements, United States commercially provided crew transportation systems offer the potential of serving as the primary means of transporting United States government astronauts and international partner astronauts to and from the ISS and serving as ISS crew rescue vehicles;
(2)
added
the budgetary assumptions used by the Administration in its planning for the Commercial Crew Program have consistently assumed significantly higher funding levels than have been authorized and appropriated by Congress;
(3)
added
credibility in the Administration’s budgetary estimates for the Commercial Crew Program can be enhanced by an independently developed cost estimate;
(4)
added
such credibility in budgetary estimates is an important factor in understanding program risk;
(5)
added
United States access to low-Earth orbit is paramount to the continued success of the ISS and ISS National Laboratory;
(6)
added
a stable and successful Commercial Resupply Services Program and Commercial Crew Program are critical to ensuring timely provisioning of the ISS and to reestablishing the capability to launch United States government astronauts from United States soil into orbit, ending reliance upon Russian transport of United States government astronauts to the ISS which has not been possible since the retirement of the Space Shuttle program in 2011;
(7)
added
NASA should build upon the success of the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Program and Commercial Resupply Services Program that have allowed private sector companies to partner with NASA to deliver cargo and scientific experiments to the ISS since 2012;
(8)
added
the 21st Century Launch Complex Program has enabled significant modernization and infrastructure improvements at launch sites across the United States to support NASA's Commercial Resupply Services Program and other civil and commercial space flight missions; and
(9)
added
the 21st Century Launch Complex Program should be continued in a manner that leverages State and private investments to achieve the goals of that program.
(c)
changed
Commercial cargo program—Reaffirmation— Section 401 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18341) is amended by striking “Commercial Orbital Transportation Services ” and inserting “Commercial Resupply Services”.Congress reaffirms—
(1)
added
its commitment to the use of a commercially developed, private sector launch and delivery system to the ISS for crew missions as expressed in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155; 119 Stat. 2895), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–422; 122 Stat. 4779), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301 et seq.); and
(2)
added
the requirement under section 50111(b)(1)(A) of title 51, United States Code, that the Administration shall make use of United States commercially provided ISS crew transfer and crew rescue services to the maximum extent practicable.
(d)
changed
Crew safety—Use of non-United States human space flight transportation capabilities— The Administrator shall protect the safety of United States crews by ensuring commercial crew systems meet all applicable human rating requirements in accordance with section 403(b)(1) Section 201(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18342(b)(1)).18311(a)) is amended to read as follows:
added
“(a) Use of non-United States human space flight transportation services
added
“(1) In general—The Federal Government may not acquire human space flight transportation services from a foreign entity unless—
added
“(A) no United States Government-operated human space flight capability is available;
added
“(B) no United States commercial provider is available; and
added
“(C) it is a qualified foreign entity.
added
“(2) Definitions—In this subsection:
added
“(A) Commercial provider—The term commercial provider means any person providing human space flight transportation services, primary control of which is held by persons other than the Federal Government, a State or local government, or a foreign government.
added
“(B) Qualified foreign entity—The term qualified foreign entity means a foreign entity that is in compliance with all applicable safety standards and is not prohibited from providing space transportation services under other law.
added
“(C) United States commercial provider—The term United States commercial provider means a commercial provider, organized under the laws of the United States or of a State, that is more than 50 percent owned by United States nationals.
added
“(3) Arrangements with foreign entities—Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the Administrator from negotiating or entering into human space flight transportation arrangements with foreign entities to ensure safety of flight and continued ISS operations.”
(e)
added
Commercial Crew Program—
(A)
added
In general— The Administrator shall protect the safety of government astronauts by ensuring that each commercially provided transportation system under this subsection meets all applicable human rating requirements in accordance with section 403(b)(1) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18342(b)(1)).
(B)
added
Lessons learned— Consistent with the findings and recommendations of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, the Administration shall ensure that safety and the minimization of the probability of loss of crew are the critical priorities of the Commercial Crew Program.
(2)
added
Cost minimization— The Administrator shall strive through the competitive selection process to minimize the life cycle cost to the Administration through the planned period of commercially provided crew transportation services.
(f)
added
Commercial cargo program— Section 401 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18341) is amended by striking “Commercial Orbital Transportation Services” and inserting “Commercial Resupply Services”.
(g)
added
Competition— It is the policy of the United States that, to foster the competitive development, operation, improvement, and commercial availability of space transportation services, and to minimize the life cycle cost to the Administration, the Administrator shall procure services for Federal Government access to and return from the ISS, whenever practicable, via fair and open competition for well-defined, milestone-based, Federal Acquisition Regulation-based contracts under section 201(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18311(a)).
(1)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that cost transparency and schedule transparency aid in effective program management and risk assessment.
(2)
added
In general— The Administrator shall, to the greatest extent practicable and in a manner that does not add costs or schedule delays to the program, ensure all Commercial Crew Program and Commercial Resupply Services Program providers provide evidence-based support for their costs and schedules.
(i)
added
ISS cargo resupply services lessons learned— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—
(1)
added
identifies the lessons learned to date from previous and existing Commercial Resupply Services contracts;
(2)
added
indicates whether changes are needed to the manner in which the Administration procures and manages similar services prior to the issuance of future Commercial Resupply Services procurement opportunities; and
(3)
added
identifies any lessons learned from the Commercial Resupply Services contracts that should be applied to the procurement and management of commercially provided crew transfer services to and from the ISS or to other future procurements.
Sec. 303
ISS transition plan
(a)
changed
Findings— Congress finds that NASA has been both the primary supplier and consumer of human space flight capabilities and services of the ISS and in low-Earth orbit.that—
(1)
added
NASA has been both the primary supplier and consumer of human space flight capabilities and services of the ISS and in low-Earth orbit; and
(2)
added
according to the National Research Council report “Pathways to Exploration: Rationales and Approaches for a U.S. Program of Human Space Exploration” extending ISS beyond 2020 to 2024 or 2028 will have significant negative impacts on the schedule of crewed missions to Mars, without significant increases in funding.
(b)
changed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that an orderly transition is needed for United States human space flight activities in low-Earth orbit from the current regime, that relies heavily on NASA sponsorship, to a regime where NASA is one of many customers of a low-Earth orbit commercial human space flight enterprise.that—
(1)
added
an orderly transition for United States human space flight activities in low-Earth orbit from the current regime, that relies heavily on NASA sponsorship, to a regime where NASA is one of many customers of a low-Earth orbit commercial human space flight enterprise may be necessary; and
(2)
added
decisions about the long-term future of the ISS impact the ability to conduct future deep space exploration activities, and that such decisions regarding the ISS should be considered in the context of the Human Exploration Roadmap under section 432 of this Act.
(c)
Reports— Section 50111 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) ISS transition plan
changed
“(1) In general—The Administrator, in coordination with the ISS management entity, entity (as defined in section 2 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016), ISS partners, the scientific user community, and the commercial space sector sector, shall develop a plan to transition in a step-wise approach from the current regime that relies heavily on NASA sponsorship to a regime where NASA is could be one of many customers of a low-Earth orbit commercial non-governmental human space flight enterprise.
changed
“(2) Reports—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016, December 1, 2017, and triennially biennially thereafter until 2023, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of Congress the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report that includes—
changed
“(A) an identification a description of low-Earth orbit capabilities necessary to meet the progress in achieving the Administration’s deep space human space flight exploration objectives on ISS and prospects for accomplishing future mission requirements beyond the period of operation and utilization of the ISS described in section 503 of the National Aeronautics requirements, space exploration objectives, and Space Administration Authorization Act other research objectives on future commercially supplied low-Earth orbit platforms or migration of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18353), if any;those objectives to cis-lunar space;
“(B) steps NASA is taking and will take, including demonstrations that could be conducted on the ISS, to stimulate and facilitate commercial demand and supply of products and services in low-Earth orbit;
changed
“(C) an assessment identification of current and projected commercial activities in barriers preventing the commercialization of low-Earth orbit, including on the ISS, issues relating to policy, regulations, commercial intellectual property, data, and their potential for meeting confidentiality, that could inhibit the capabilities identified in subparagraph (A);use of the ISS as a commercial incubator;
changed
“(D) an identification of barriers preventing the commercialization of low-Earth orbit, including issues relating to policy, regulations, commercial intellectual property, data, and confidentiality that could inhibit the use of criteria for defining the ISS as a commercial incubator;research success;
changed
“(E) an evaluation of the feasible and preferred service life of criteria used to determine whether the ISS beyond is meeting the period described in objective under section 503 301(b)(2) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18353), through at least 2028, as a unique scientific, commercial, and exploration-related facility, including—2016;
changed
“(i) a general discussion “(F) an assessment of international partner capabilities and prospects for extending whether the partnership, to include criteria under subparagraphs (D) and (E) are consistent with the potential for participation by additional countries, for research areas defined in, and recommendations and schedules under, the purposes current National Academies of the human development Sciences, Engineering, and exploration of deep space;Medicine Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space;
changed
“(ii) a review of essential systems, equipment upgrades, or potential maintenance “(G) any necessary contributions that ISS extension would be necessary make to extend ISS operations enabling execution of the Human Exploration Roadmap under section 432 of the National Aeronautics and utilization;Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016;
changed
“(iii) an evaluation of “(H) the cost and schedule requirements associated with estimates for operating the development ISS to achieve the criteria required under subparagraphs (D) and delivery of essential systems, equipment upgrades, or potential maintenance (E) and the contributions identified under clause (ii);subparagraph (G);
changed
“(iv) an identification “(I) the cost estimates for extending operations of possible international, academic, or industry partner contributions, cost-share, and program transitions to provide the upgrades identified under clause (ii);ISS to 2024, 2028, and 2030;
changed
“(v) impacts on “(J) an evaluation of the goals feasible and objectives preferred service life of the ISS National Laboratory and beyond the management entity responsible for operation period described in section 503 of the ISS National Laboratory;Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18353), through at least 2028, as a unique scientific, commercial, and space exploration-related facility, including—
changed
“(vi) impacts on services provided by the Commercial Resupply Services “(i) a general discussion of international partner capabilities and Commercial Crew Program to prospects for extending the ISS;partnership;
changed
“(vii) impacts on the use of the ISS as a testbed to transition functions of the ISS to “(ii) the commercial space sector and enhance economic development of low-Earth orbit, including cost associated with extending the evolution of self-sustaining commercial activities;service life;
changed
“(viii) “(iii) an assessment on the technical limiting factor factors of the ISS lifetime, service life of the ISS, including a list of critical components and their expected lifetime service life and availability;availability; and
changed
“(ix) an evaluation of “(iv) such other information as may be necessary to fully describe the potential justification for expanding the use and feasibility of ISS facilities to accommodate extending the needs service life of researchers and other users, the ISS, including changes the potential scientific or technological benefits to policies, regulations, and laws that would stimulate greater private and public involvement on the ISS; andFederal Government, public, or to academic or commercial entities;
changed
“(x) such other information as may be necessary to fully describe the justification for and feasibility “(K) an identification of extending the service life necessary actions and an estimate of the ISS, including the potential scientific or technological benefits costs to deorbit the Federal Government or public, or to academic or commercial entities;ISS once it has reached the end of its service life;
changed
“(F) an evaluation of “(L) the functions, roles, and responsibilities for management and operation impact on deep space exploration capabilities, including a crewed mission to Mars in the 2030s, if the preferred service life of the ISS is extended beyond 2024 and NASA maintains a determination of—flat budget profile; and
added
“(M) an evaluation of the functions, roles, and responsibilities for management and operation of the ISS and a determination of—
“(i) those functions, roles, and responsibilities the Federal Government should retain during the lifecycle of the ISS;
“(ii) those functions, roles, and responsibilities that could be transferred to the commercial space sector;
“(iii) the metrics that would indicate the commercial space sector's readiness and ability to assume the functions, roles, and responsibilities described in clause (ii); and
removed
“(iv) any necessary changes to any agreements or other documents and the law to enable the activities described in subparagraphs (B) and (C); and
changed
“(G) progress on meeting human exploration research objectives on ISS and prospects for accomplishing future exploration and other research objectives on future commercially supplied low-Earth orbit platforms “(iv) any necessary changes to any agreements or migration of those objectives other documents and the law to cis-lunar space.enable the activities described in subparagraphs (A) and (B).
changed
“(3) Demonstrations—Demonstrations Demonstrations—If additional Government crew, power, and transportation resources are available after meeting the Administration's requirements for ISS activities defined in the Human Exploration Roadmap and related research, demonstrations identified under paragraph (2) may—
changed
“(A) test the capabilities needed to meet future mission requirements, space exploration objectives, and other research objectives described in paragraph (2)(A); and
changed
“(B) demonstrate or test capabilities, including commercial modules or deep space habitats, Environmental Control and Life Support Systems, orbital satellite assembly, exploration space suits, a node that enables a wide variety of activity, including multiple commercial modules and airlocks, additional docking or berthing ports for commercial crew and cargo, opportunities for the commercial space sector to cost share for transportation and other services on the ISS, and other commercial activities.”activities, or services obtained through alternate acquisition approaches.”
Sec. 304
Space communications
added
(a)
added
Plan— The Administrator shall develop a plan, in consultation with relevant Federal agencies, to meet the Administration's projected space communication and navigation needs for low-Earth orbit and deep space operations in the 20-year period following the date of enactment of this Act.
(b)
added
Contents— The plan shall include—
(1)
added
the lifecycle cost estimates and a 5-year funding profile;
(2)
added
the performance capabilities required to meet the Administration's projected space communication and navigation needs;
(3)
added
the measures the Administration will take to sustain the existing space communications and navigation architecture;
(4)
added
an identification of the projected space communications and navigation network and infrastructure needs;
(5)
added
a description of the necessary upgrades to meet the needs identified in paragraph (4), including—
(A)
added
an estimate of the cost of the upgrades;
(B)
added
a schedule for implementing the upgrades; and
(C)
added
an assessment of whether and how any related missions will be impacted if resources are not secured at the level needed;
(6)
added
the cost estimates for the maintenance of existing space communications network capabilities necessary to meet the needs identified in paragraph (4);
(7)
added
the criteria for prioritizing resources for the upgrades described in paragraph (5) and the maintenance described in paragraph (6);
(8)
added
an estimate of any reimbursement amounts the Administration may receive from other Federal agencies;
(9)
added
an identification of the projected Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System needs in the 20-year period following the date of enactment of this Act, including in support of relevant Federal agencies, and cost and schedule estimates to maintain and upgrade the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System to meet the projected needs;
(10)
added
the measures the Administration is taking to meet space communications needs after all Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System third-generation communications satellites are operational; and
(11)
added
the measures the Administration is taking to mitigate threats to electromagnetic spectrum use.
(c)
added
Schedule— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit the plan to the appropriate committees of Congress.
Sec. 305
Indemnification; NASA launch services and reentry services
added
(a)
added
In general— Subchapter III of chapter 201 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
added
“20148. Indemnification; NASA launch services and reentry services
added
“(a) In general—Under such regulations in conformity with this section as the Administrator shall prescribe taking into account the availability, cost, and terms of liability insurance, any contract between the Administration and a provider may provide that the United States will indemnify the provider against successful claims (including reasonable expenses of litigation or settlement) by third parties for death, bodily injury, or loss of or damage to property resulting from launch services and reentry services carried out under the contract that the contract defines as unusually hazardous or nuclear in nature, but only to the extent the total amount of successful claims related to the activities under the contract—
added
“(1) is more than the amount of insurance or demonstration of financial responsibility described in subsection (c)(3); and
added
“(2) is not more than the amount specified in section 50915(a)(1)(B).
added
“(b) Terms of indemnification—A contract made under subsection (a) that provides indemnification shall provide for—
added
“(1) notice to the United States of any claim or suit against the provider for death, bodily injury, or loss of or damage to property; and
added
“(2) control of or assistance in the defense by the United States, at its election, of that claim or suit and approval of any settlement.
added
“(c) Liability insurance of the provider
added
“(1) In general—The provider under subsection (a) shall obtain liability insurance or demonstrate financial responsibility in amounts to compensate for the maximum probable loss from claims by—
added
“(A) a third party for death, bodily injury, or property damage or loss resulting from a launch service or reentry service carried out under the contract; and
added
“(B) the United States Government for damage or loss to Government property resulting from a launch service or reentry service carried out under the contract.
added
“(2) Maximum probable losses
added
“(A) In general—The Administrator shall determine the maximum probable losses under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) not later than 90 days after the date that the provider requests such a determination and submits all information the Administrator requires.
added
“(B) Revisions—The Administrator may revise a determination under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph if the Administrator determines the revision is warranted based on new information.
added
“(3) Amount of insurance—For the total claims related to one launch or reentry, a provider shall not be required to obtain insurance or demonstrate financial responsibility of more than—
added
“(A)
added
“(i) $500,000,000 under paragraph (1)(A); or
added
“(ii) $100,000,000 under paragraph (1)(B); or
added
“(B) the maximum liability insurance available on the world market at reasonable cost.
added
“(4) Coverage—An insurance policy or demonstration of financial responsibility under this subsection shall protect the following, to the extent of their potential liability for involvement in launch services or reentry services:
added
“(A) The Government.
added
“(B) Personnel of the Government.
added
“(C) Related entities of the Government.
added
“(D) Related entities of the provider.
added
“(E) Government astronauts.
added
“(d) No indemnification without cross-waiver—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Administrator may not indemnify a provider under this section unless there is a cross-waiver between the Administration and the provider as described in subsection (e).
added
“(e) Cross-Waivers
added
“(1) In general—The Administrator, on behalf of the United States and its departments, agencies, and instrumentalities, shall reciprocally waive claims with a provider under which each party to the waiver agrees to be responsible, and agrees to ensure that its related entities are responsible, for damage or loss to its property, or for losses resulting from any injury or death sustained by its employees or agents, as a result of activities arising out of the performance of the contract.
added
“(2) Limitation—The waiver made by the Government under paragraph (1) shall apply only to the extent that the claims are more than the amount of insurance or demonstration of financial responsibility required under subsection (c)(1)(B).
added
“(f) Willful misconduct—Indemnification under subsection (a) may exclude claims resulting from the willful misconduct of the provider or its related entities.
added
“(g) Certification of just and reasonable amount—No payment may be made under subsection (a) unless the Administrator or the Administrator's designee certifies that the amount is just and reasonable.
added
“(h) Payments
added
“(1) In general—Upon the approval by the Administrator, payments under subsection (a) may be made from funds appropriated for such payments.
added
“(2) Limitation—The Administrator shall not approve payments under paragraph (1), except to the extent provided in an appropriation law or to the extent additional legislative authority is enacted providing for such payments.
added
“(3) Additional appropriations—If the Administrator requests additional appropriations to make payments under this subsection, then the request for those appropriations shall be made in accordance with the procedures established under section 50915.
added
“(i) Rules of construction
added
“(1) In general—The authority to indemnify under this section shall not create any rights in third persons that would not otherwise exist by law.
added
“(2) Other authority—Nothing in this section may be construed as prohibiting the Administrator from indemnifying a provider or any other NASA contractor under other law, including under Public Law 85–804 (50 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.).
added
“(3) Anti-Deficiency Act—Notwithstanding any other provision of this section—
added
“(A) all obligations under this section are subject to the availability of funds; and
added
“(B) nothing in this section may be construed to require obligation or payment of funds in violation of sections 1341, 1342, 1349 through 1351, and 1511 through 1519 of title 31, United States Code (commonly referred to as the “Anti-Deficiency Act”).
added
“(j) Relationship to other laws—The Administrator may not provide indemnification under this section for an activity that requires a license or permit under chapter 509.
added
“(k) Definitions—In this section:
added
“(1) Government astronaut—The term government astronaut has the meaning given the term in section 50902.
added
“(2) Launch services—The term launch services has the meaning given the term in section 50902.
added
“(3) Provider—The term provider means a person that provides domestic launch services or domestic reentry services to the Government.
added
“(4) Reentry services—The term reentry services has the meaning given the term in section 50902.
added
“(5) Related entity—The term related entity means a contractor or subcontractor.
added
“(6) Third party—The term third party means a person except—
added
“(A) the United States Government;
added
“(B) related entities of the Government involved in launch services or reentry services;
added
“(C) a provider;
added
“(D) related entities of the provider involved in launch services or reentry services; or
added
“(E) a government astronaut.”
(b)
added
Conforming amendment— The table of contents for subchapter III of chapter 201 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 20147 the following:
Sec. 411
Human space flight and exploration long-term goals
Section 202(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18312(a)) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Long-term goals—The long-term goals of the human space flight and exploration efforts of NASA shall be—
changed
“(1) to expand permanent human presence beyond low-Earth orbit and to do so, where practical, in a manner involving international, academic, and industry partners; andpartners;
changed
“(2) crewed missions and progress toward achieving the peaceful settlement of a location goal in space or on another celestial body paragraph (1) to enable the potential for subsequent human exploration and a thriving space economy in the 21st century.”extension of human presence throughout the solar system; and
added
“(3) to enable a capability to extend human presence, including potential human habitation on another celestial body and a thriving space economy in the 21st Century.”
Section 202(b) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18312(b)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(2)
in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
changed
“(5) to achieve human exploration of Mars, including Mars and beyond through the establishment prioritization of those technologies and capabilities best suited for such a capability to extend human presence, including potential human habitation, on mission in accordance with the surface stepping stone approach to exploration under section 70504 of Mars.”title 51, United States Code.”
Sec. 413
Vision for space exploration
Section 20302 of title 51, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
changed
in subsection (a), by inserting “in cis-lunar space or” after “sustained human presence”; andpresence”;
(2)
by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
“(b) Future exploration of Mars—The Administrator shall manage human space flight programs, including the Space Launch System and Orion, to enable humans to explore Mars and other destinations by defining a series of sustainable steps and conducting mission planning, research, and technology development on a timetable that is technically and fiscally possible, consistent with section 70504.”
(3)
added
by adding at the end the following:
added
“(c) Definitions—In this section:
added
“(1) Orion—The term Orion means the multipurpose crew vehicle described under section 303 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18323).
added
“(2) Space Launch System—The term Space Launch System means has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18302).”
Sec. 414
Stepping stone approach to exploration
changed
Section 70502(2) 70504 of title 51, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
changed
“(2) implement an exploration research and technology development program “70504. Stepping stone approach to enable human and robotic operations consistent with section 20302(b) of this title;”exploration
added
“(a) In general—The Administration may conduct missions to intermediate destinations, including the surface of the Moon, cis-lunar space, near-Earth asteroids, Lagrangian points, and Martian moons, in a series of sustainable steps in accordance with section 20302(b) of title 51, United States Code, in order to achieve the objective of human exploration of Mars specified in section 202(b)(5) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18312(b)(5)).
added
“(b) Cost-effectiveness—In order to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the long-term space exploration and utilization activities of the United States, the Administrator shall take all necessary steps, including engaging international, academic, and industry partners, to ensure that activities in the Administration's human space exploration program balance how those activities might also help meet the requirements of future exploration and utilization activities leading to human habitation on the surface of Mars.
added
“(c) Completion—Within budgetary considerations, once an exploration-related project enters its development phase, the Administrator shall seek, to the maximum extent practicable, to complete that project without undue delays.
added
“(d) International participation—In order to achieve the goal of successfully conducting a crewed mission to the surface of Mars, the President may invite the United States partners in the ISS program and other nations, as appropriate, to participate in an international initiative under the leadership of the United States.”
Sec. 415
Update of exploration plan and programs
changed
Section 70504 70502(2) of title 51, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
changed
“70504. Stepping stone approach “(2) implement an exploration research and technology development program to explorationenable human and robotic operations consistent with section 20302(b) of this title;”
removed
“(a) In general—In order to maximize the cost-effectiveness of the long-term exploration and utilization activities of the United States, the Administrator shall take all necessary steps, including engaging international, academic, and industry partners to ensure that activities in the Administration's human exploration program balance how those activities might also help meet the requirements of future exploration and utilization activities leading to human habitation on the surface of Mars.
removed
“(b) Completion—Within budgetary considerations, once an exploration-related project enters its development phase, the Administrator shall seek, to the maximum extent practicable, to complete that project without undue delays.”
(a)
added
Space Shuttle capability assurance— Section 203 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18313) is amended—
(1)
added
by striking subsection (b);
(2)
added
in subsection (d), by striking “subsection (c)” and inserting “subsection (b)”; and
(3)
added
by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively.
(b)
added
Shuttle pricing policy for commercial and foreign users— Chapter 703 of title 51, United States Code, and the item relating to that chapter in the table of chapters for that title, are repealed.
(c)
added
Shuttle privatization— Section 50133 of title 51, United States Code, and the item relating to that section in the table of sections for chapter 501 of that title, are repealed.
Sec. 417
Assured access to space
added
added
Section 70501 of title 51, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added
by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
added
“(a) Policy statement—In order to ensure continuous United States participation and leadership in the exploration and utilization of space and as an essential instrument of national security, it is the policy of the United States to maintain an uninterrupted capability for human space flight and operations—
added
“(1) in low-Earth orbit; and
added
“(2) beyond low-Earth orbit once the capabilities described in section 421(e) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016 become available.”
(2)
added
in subsection (b), by striking “Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate describing the progress being made toward developing the Crew Exploration Vehicle and the Crew Launch Vehicle” and inserting “Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives describing the progress being made toward developing the Space Launch System and Orion”.
Sec. 421
Space Launch System, Orion, and Exploration Ground Systems
(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
NASA has made steady progress in developing and testing the Space Launch System and Orion exploration systems with the successful Exploration Flight Test of Orion in December of 2014, the final qualification test firing of the 5-segment Space Launch System boosters in June 2016, and a full thrust, full duration test firing of the RS–25 Space Launch System core stage engine in August 2016.
(2)
changed
Through the 21st Century Launch Complex program and Exploration Ground Systems (referred to in this section as “EGS”) programs, NASA has made significant progress in transforming exploration ground systems infrastructure to meet NASA’s mission requirements for the Space Launch System and Orion and to modernize NASA’s launch complexes to the benefit of the civil, defense, and commercial space sectors.
(b)
added
Space Launch System—
(1)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Space Launch System is the most practical approach to reaching the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
(b)
removed
Sense of Congress on Space Launch System, Orion, and EGS— It is the sense of Congress that—
(2)
changed
Reaffirmation— as the United States works to send humans on a series of missions on or near Mars in the 2030s, Congress reaffirms the United States national space program should continue to make progress on its commitment by fully developing policy and minimum capability requirements for the Space Launch System, Orion, System under section 302 of the National Aeronautics and related exploration ground systems;Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18322).
(c)
added
Sense of Congress on Space Launch System, Orion, and Exploration Ground Systems— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
as the United States works to send humans on a series of missions to Mars in the 2030s, the United States national space program should continue to make progress on its commitment by fully developing the Space Launch System, Orion, and related Exploration Ground Systems;
(2)
added
using the Space Launch System and Orion for a wide range of contemplated missions will facilitate the national defense, science, and exploration objectives of the United States;
(3)
added
the United States should have continuity of purpose for the Space Launch System and Orion in deep space exploration missions, using them beginning with the uncrewed mission, EM–1, planned for 2018, followed by the crewed mission, EM–2, in cis-lunar space planned for 2021, and for subsequent missions beginning with EM–3 extending into cis-lunar space and eventually to Mars;
(4)
added
the President’s annual budget requests for the Space Launch System and Orion development, test, and operational phases should strive to accurately reflect the resource requirements of each of those phases;
(5)
added
the fully integrated Space Launch System, including an upper stage needed to go beyond low-Earth orbit, will safely enable human space exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond; and
(6)
added
the Administrator should budget for and undertake a robust ground test and uncrewed and crewed flight test and demonstration program for the Space Launch System and Orion in order to promote safety and reduce programmatic risk.
(d)
added
In general— The Administrator shall continue development of the fully integrated Space Launch System, including an upper stage needed to go beyond low-Earth orbit, in order to safely enable human space exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond over the course of the next century as required in section 302(c) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18322(c)).
(2)
removed
using the Space Launch System and Orion for a wide range of contemplated missions will facilitate the national defense, science, and exploration objectives of the United States; and
(3)
removed
continuity of purpose within the Space Launch System and Orion programs are imperative as NASA prepares for the uncrewed mission, EM–1, planned for 2018 followed by the crewed mission, EM–2, in cis-lunar space planned for 2021, and for subsequent missions beginning with EM–3 extending into cis-lunar space and eventually to Mars.
(e)
renumbered
was (4)(2)
Exploration missions— The Administrator shall continue development of—
(1)
renumbered
was (4)(2)(3)
an uncrewed exploration mission to demonstrate the capability of both the Space Launch System and Orion as an integrated system by 2018;
(2)
added
subject to applicable human rating processes and requirements, a crewed exploration mission to demonstrate the Space Launch System, including the Core Stage and Exploration Upper Stages, by 2021;
(3)
added
subsequent missions beginning with EM–3 at operational flight rate sufficient to maintain safety and operational readiness using the Space Launch System and Orion to extend into cis-lunar space and eventually to Mars; and
(4)
added
a deep space habitat as a key element in a deep space exploration architecture along with the Space Launch System and Orion.
(B)
removed
a crewed exploration mission to demonstrate the Space Launch System, including the Core Stage and Exploration Upper Stages, and the crewed Orion by 2021;
(C)
removed
subsequent missions beginning with EM–3 using the Space Launch System and Orion to extend into cis-lunar space and eventually to Mars; and
(D)
removed
development of a deep space habitat as the next element in a deep space exploration architecture along with the Space Launch System and Orion.
(f)
renumbered
was (4)(3)
Other uses— The Administrator shall assess the utility of the Space Launch System for use by the science community and for other Federal Government launch needs, including consideration of overall cost and schedule savings from reduced transit times and increased science returns enabled by the unique capabilities of the Space Launch System.
(g)
added
Utilization report—
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, shall prepare a report that addresses the effort and budget required to enable and utilize a cargo variant of the 130-ton Space Launch System configuration described in section 302(c) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18322(c)).
(2)
added
Contents— In preparing the report, the Administrator shall—
(A)
added
consider the technical requirements of the scientific and national security communities related to a cargo variant of the Space Launch System; and
(B)
added
directly assess the utility and estimated cost savings obtained by using a cargo variant of the Space Launch System for national security and space science missions.
(3)
added
Submission to Congress— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit the report to the appropriate committees of Congress.
Sec. 431
Findings on human space exploration
added
Congress makes the following findings:
(a)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that advancing propulsion technology would improve the efficiency of trips to Mars and could shorten travel time to Mars and reduce astronaut health risks, reduce radiation exposure, consumables, and mass of materials required for the journey.
(1)
changed
Policy— It is the policy of the United States that the Administrator shall develop technologies to support the Administration’s core missions as described in In accordance with section 2(3) 204 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301(3)) (124 Stat. 2813), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and support sustained investments in early stage innovation Medicine, through its Committee on Human Spaceflight, conducted a review of the goals, core capabilities, and fundamental research, direction of human space flight, and technologies to expand published the boundaries findings and recommendations in a 2014 report entitled, “Pathways to Exploration: Rationales and Approaches for a U.S. Program of the national aerospace enterprise.Human Space Exploration”.
(2)
changed
Propulsion technologies— A goal of propulsion technologies developed under subsection (b), shall be to significantly reduce human travel time to Mars.The Committee on Human Spaceflight included leaders from the aerospace, scientific, security, and policy communities.
(3)
added
With input from the public, the Committee on Human Spaceflight concluded that many practical and aspirational rationales for human space flight together constitute a compelling case for continued national investment and pursuit of human space exploration toward the horizon goal of Mars.
(4)
added
According to the Committee on Human Spaceflight, the rationales include economic benefits, national security, national prestige, inspiring students and other citizens, scientific discovery, human survival, and a sense of shared destiny.
(5)
added
The Committee on Human Spaceflight affirmed that Mars is the appropriate long-term goal for the human space flight program.
(6)
added
The Committee on Human Spaceflight recommended that NASA define a series of sustainable steps and conduct mission planning and technology development as needed to achieve the long-term goal of placing humans on the surface of Mars.
(7)
added
Expanding human presence beyond low-Earth orbit and advancing toward human missions to Mars requires early planning and timely decisions to be made in the near-term on the necessary courses of action for commitments to achieve short-term and long-term goals and objectives.
(8)
added
In addition to the 2014 report described in paragraph (1), there are several independently developed reports or concepts that describe potential Mars architectures or concepts and identify Mars as the long-term goal for human space exploration, including NASA's “The Global Exploration Roadmap” of 2013, “NASA's Journey to Mars–Pioneering Next Steps in Space Exploration” of 2015, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory's “Minimal Architecture for Human Journeys to Mars” of 2015, and Explore Mars' “The Humans to Mars Report 2016”.
Sec. 432
Human exploration roadmap
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
expanding human presence beyond low-Earth orbit and advancing toward human missions to Mars in the 2030s requires early strategic planning and timely decisions to be made in the near-term on the necessary courses of action for commitments to achieve short-term and long-term goals and objectives;
(2)
added
for strong and sustained United States leadership, a need exists to advance a human exploration roadmap, addressing exploration objectives in collaboration with international, academic, and industry partners;
(3)
added
an approach that incrementally advances toward a long-term goal is one in which nearer-term developments and implementation would influence future development and implementation; and
(4)
added
a human exploration roadmap should begin with low-Earth orbit, then address in greater detail progress beyond low-Earth orbit to cis-lunar space, and then address future missions aimed at human arrival and activities near and then on the surface of Mars.
(b)
added
human exploration roadmap—
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall develop a human exploration roadmap, including a critical decision plan, to expand human presence beyond low-Earth orbit to the surface of Mars and beyond, considering potential interim destinations such as cis-lunar space and the moons of Mars.
(2)
added
Scope— The human exploration roadmap shall include—
(A)
added
an integrated set of exploration, science, and other goals and objectives of a United States human space exploration program to achieve the long-term goal of human missions near or on the surface of Mars in the 2030s;
(B)
added
opportunities for international, academic, and industry partnerships for exploration-related systems, services, research, and technology if those opportunities provide cost-savings, accelerate program schedules, or otherwise benefit the goals and objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(C)
added
sets and sequences of precursor missions in cis-lunar space and other missions or activities necessary—
(i)
added
to demonstrate the proficiency of the capabilities and technologies identified under subparagraph (D); and
(ii)
added
to meet the goals and objectives developed under subparagraph (A), including anticipated timelines and missions for the Space Launch System and Orion;
(D)
added
an identification of the specific capabilities and technologies, including the Space Launch System, Orion, a deep space habitat, and other capabilities, that facilitate the goals and objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(E)
added
a description of how cis-lunar elements, objectives, and activities advance the human exploration of Mars;
(F)
added
an assessment of potential human health and other risks, including radiation exposure;
(G)
added
mitigation plans, whenever possible, to address the risks identified in subparagraph (F);
(H)
added
a description of those technologies already under development across the Federal Government or by other entities that facilitate the goals and objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(I)
added
a specific process for the evolution of the capabilities of the fully integrated Orion with the Space Launch System and a description of how these systems facilitate the goals and objectives developed under subparagraph (A) and demonstrate the capabilities and technologies described in subparagraph (D);
(J)
added
a description of the capabilities and technologies that need to be demonstrated or research data that could be gained through the utilization of the ISS and the status of the development of such capabilities and technologies;
(K)
added
a framework for international cooperation in the development of all capabilities and technologies identified under this section, including an assessment of the risks posed by relying on international partners for capabilities and technologies on the critical path of development;
(L)
added
a process for partnering with nongovernmental entities using Space Act Agreements or other acquisition instruments for future human space exploration; and
(M)
added
include information on the phasing of planned intermediate destinations, Mars mission risk areas and potential risk mitigation approaches, technology requirements and phasing of required technology development activities, the management strategy to be followed, related ISS activities, planned international collaborative activities, potential commercial contributions, and other activities relevant to the achievement of the goal established in this section.
(3)
added
Considerations— In developing the human exploration roadmap, the Administrator shall consider—
(A)
added
using key exploration capabilities, namely the Space Launch System and Orion;
(B)
added
using existing commercially available technologies and capabilities or those technologies and capabilities being developed by industry for commercial purposes;
(C)
added
establishing an organizational approach to ensure collaboration and coordination among NASA's Mission Directorates under section 821, when appropriate, including to collect and return to Earth a sample from the Martian surface;
(D)
added
building upon the initial uncrewed mission, EM–1, and first crewed mission, EM–2, of the Space Launch System and Orion to establish a sustainable cadence of missions extending human exploration missions into cis-lunar space, including anticipated timelines and milestones;
(E)
added
developing the robotic and precursor missions and activities that will demonstrate, test, and develop key technologies and capabilities essential for achieving human missions to Mars, including long-duration human operations beyond low-Earth orbit, space suits, solar electric propulsion, deep space habitats, environmental control life support systems, Mars lander and ascent vehicle, entry, descent, landing, ascent, Mars surface systems, and in-situ resource utilization;
(F)
added
demonstrating and testing 1 or more habitat modules in cis-lunar space to prepare for Mars missions;
(G)
added
using public-private, firm fixed-price partnerships, where practicable;
(H)
added
collaborating with international, academic, and industry partners, when appropriate;
(I)
added
any risks to human health and sensitive onboard technologies, including radiation exposure;
(J)
added
any risks identified through research outcomes under the NASA Human Research Program's Behavioral Health Element; and
(K)
added
the recommendations and ideas of several independently developed reports or concepts that describe potential Mars architectures or concepts and identify Mars as the long-term goal for human space exploration, including the reports described under section 431.
(4)
added
Critical decision plan on human space exploration— As part of the human exploration roadmap, the Administrator shall include a critical decision plan—
(A)
added
identifying and defining key decisions guiding human space exploration priorities and plans that need to be made before June 30, 2020, including decisions that may guide human space exploration capability development, precursor missions, long-term missions, and activities;
(B)
added
defining decisions needed to maximize efficiencies and resources for reaching the near, intermediate, and long-term goals and objectives of human space exploration; and
(C)
added
identifying and defining timelines and milestones for a sustainable cadence of missions beginning with EM–3 for the Space Launch System and Orion to extend human exploration from cis-lunar space to the surface of Mars.
(A)
added
Initial human exploration roadmap— The Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress—
(i)
added
an initial human exploration roadmap, including a critical decision plan, before December 1, 2017; and
(ii)
added
an updated human exploration roadmap periodically as the Administrator considers necessary but not less than biennially.
(B)
added
Contents— Each human exploration roadmap under this paragraph shall include a description of—
(i)
added
the achievements and goals accomplished in the process of developing such capabilities and technologies during the 2-year period prior to the submission of the human exploration roadmap; and
(ii)
added
the expected goals and achievements in the following 2- year period.
(C)
added
Submission with budget— Each human exploration roadmap under this section shall be included in the budget for that fiscal year transmitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.
removed
Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
removed
In accordance with section 204 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (124 Stat. 2813), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, through its Committee on Human Spaceflight, conducted a review of the goals, core capabilities, and direction of human space flight, and published the findings and recommendations in a 2014 report entitled, “Pathways to Exploration: Rationales and Approaches for a U.S. Program of Human Space Exploration”.
(2)
removed
The Committee on Human Spaceflight included leaders from the aerospace, scientific, security, and policy communities.
(3)
removed
With input from the public, the Committee on Human Spaceflight concluded that many practical and aspirational rationales for human space flight together constitute a compelling case for continued national investment and pursuit of human space exploration toward the horizon goal of Mars.
(4)
removed
According to the Committee on Human Spaceflight, the rationales include economic benefits, national security, national prestige, inspiring students and other citizens, scientific discovery, human survival, and a sense of shared destiny.
(5)
removed
The Committee on Human Spaceflight affirmed that Mars is the appropriate long-term goal for the human space flight program.
(6)
removed
The Committee on Human Spaceflight recommended that NASA define a series of sustainable steps and conduct mission planning and technology development as needed to achieve the long-term goal of placing humans on the surface of Mars.
(7)
removed
Expanding human presence beyond low-Earth orbit and advancing toward human missions to Mars requires early planning and timely decisions to be made in the near-term on the necessary courses of action for commitments to achieve short-term and long-term goals and objectives.
(8)
removed
In addition to the 2014 report described in paragraph (1), there are several independently developed reports or concepts that describe potential Mars architectures or concepts and identify Mars as the long-term goal for human space exploration, including NASA's “The Global Exploration Roadmap” of 2013, “NASA's Journey to Mars–Pioneering Next Steps in Space Exploration” of 2015, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory's “Minimal Architecture for Human Journeys to Mars” of 2015, and Explore Mars' “The Humans to Mars Report 2016”.
Sec. 433
Advanced space suit capability
added
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed plan for achieving an advanced space suit capability that aligns with the crew needs for exploration enabled by the Space Launch System and Orion, including an evaluation of the merit of delivering the planned suit system for use on the ISS.
(a)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
expanding human presence beyond low-Earth orbit and advancing toward human missions to Mars in the 2030s requires early planning and timely decisions to be made in the near-term on the necessary courses of action for commitments to achieve short-term and long-term goals and objectives;
(2)
removed
for strong and sustained United States leadership, a need exists to advance a strategic framework, addressing exploration objectives in collaboration with international, academic, and industry partners;
(3)
removed
an approach that incrementally advances toward a long-term goal is one in which nearer-term developments and implementation would influence future development and implementation; and
(4)
removed
a strategic framework should begin with low-Earth orbit, then address progress beyond low-Earth orbit to cis-lunar space in greater detail than future missions ultimately aimed at human arrival and activities on or near Mars.
(b)
removed
Strategic framework—
(1)
removed
In general— The Administrator shall develop a strategic framework, including, a critical decision plan, to expand human presence beyond low-Earth orbit, including to cis-lunar space, the moons of Mars, the surface of Mars, and beyond.
(2)
removed
Scope— The strategic framework shall include—
(A)
removed
an integrated set of exploration, science, and other goals and objectives of a United States human space exploration program with the long-term goal of human missions near to or on the surface of Mars in the 2030s;
(B)
removed
opportunities for international, academic, and industry partnerships for exploration-related systems, services, research, and technology if those opportunities provide cost-savings, accelerate program schedules, or otherwise benefit the exploration objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(C)
removed
precursor missions in cis-lunar space and other missions or activities necessary to meet the exploration objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(D)
removed
capabilities and technologies, including the Space Launch System, Orion, a deep space habitat, and other capabilities, that enable the exploration objectives developed under subparagraph (A);
(E)
removed
a description of how cis-lunar elements, objectives, and activities advance the human exploration of Mars;
(F)
removed
an assessment of potential human health and other risks, including radiation exposure; and
(G)
removed
mitigation plans, whenever possible, to address the risks identified in subparagraph (F).
(3)
removed
Considerations— In developing the strategic framework, the Administrator shall consider—
(A)
removed
using key exploration capabilities, namely the Space Launch System and Orion;
(B)
removed
using existing commercially available technologies and capabilities or those technologies and capabilities being developed by industry for commercial purposes;
(C)
removed
an organizational approach to ensure collaboration and coordination among NASA's Mission Directorates under section 621, when appropriate;
(D)
removed
building upon the initial uncrewed mission, EM–1, and first crewed mission, EM–2, of the Space Launch System and Orion to establish a sustainable cadence of missions extending human exploration missions into cis-lunar space;
(E)
removed
developing the precursor missions and activities that will demonstrate, test, and develop key technologies and capabilities essential for achieving human missions to Mars, including long-duration human operations beyond low-Earth orbit, space suits, solar electric propulsion, deep space habitats, environmental control life support systems, Mars lander and ascent vehicle, entry, descent, landing, ascent, Mars surface systems, and in-situ resource utilization;
(F)
removed
demonstrating and testing one or more habitat modules in cis-lunar space to prepare for Mars missions;
(G)
removed
using public-private, firm fixed-price partnerships, where practicable;
(H)
removed
collaborating with international, academic, and industry partners, when appropriate;
(I)
removed
risks to human health and sensitive onboard technologies, including radiation exposure;
(J)
removed
evaluating the risks identified through research outcomes under the NASA Human Research Program's Behavioral Health Element; and
(K)
removed
the recommendations and ideas of several independently developed reports or concepts that describe potential Mars architectures or concepts and identify Mars as the long-term goal for human space exploration, including the reports described under section 432(8).
(4)
removed
Critical decision plan on human space exploration— As part of the strategic framework, the Administrator shall include a critical decision plan—
(A)
removed
identifying and defining key decisions guiding human space exploration priorities and plans that need to be made before June 30, 2020, including decisions that may guide human space exploration capability development, precursor missions, long-term missions, and activities; and
(B)
removed
defining decisions needed to maximize efficiencies and resources for reaching the near, intermediate, and long-term goals and objectives of human space exploration.
(5)
removed
Reports— The Administrator shall submit an initial strategic framework, including a critical decision plan, to the appropriate committee of Congress before December 31, 2017, and an updated strategic framework biennially thereafter.
Sec. 434
Asteroid robotic redirect mission
(a)
changed
In general—Findings— Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed plan for achieving an advanced space suit capability that aligns with the crew needs for exploration enabled by the space launch system and Orion, including an evaluation of the merit of delivering the planned suit system for use on makes the ISS.following findings:
(1)
added
NASA initially estimated that the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission would launch in December 2020 and cost no more than $1,250,000,000, excluding launch and operations.
(2)
added
On July 15, 2016, NASA conducted its Key Decision Point–B review of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission or approval for Phase B in mission formulation.
(3)
added
During the Key Decision Point–B review, NASA estimated that costs have grown to $1,400,000,000 excluding launch and operations for a launch in December 2021 and the agency must evaluate whether to accept the increase or reduce the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission’s scope to stay within the cost cap set by the Administrator.
(4)
added
In April 2015, the NASA Advisory Council—
(A)
added
issued a finding that—
(i)
added
high-performance solar electric propulsion will likely be an important part of an architecture to send humans to Mars; and
(ii)
added
maneuvering a large test mass is not necessary to provide a valid in-space test of a new solar electric propulsion stage;
(B)
added
determined that a solar electric propulsion mission will contribute more directly to the goal of sending humans to Mars if the mission is focused entirely on development and validation of the solar electric propulsion stage; and
(C)
added
determined that other possible motivations for acquiring and maneuvering a boulder, such as asteroid science and planetary defense, do not have value commensurate with their probable cost.
(5)
added
The Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission is competing for resources with other critical exploration development programs, including the Space Launch System, Orion, commercial crew, and a habitation module.
(6)
added
In 2014, the NASA Advisory Council recommended that NASA conduct an independent cost and technical assessment of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission.
(7)
added
In 2015, the NASA Advisory Council recommended that NASA preserve the following key objectives if the program needed to be descoped:
(A)
added
Development of high power solar electric propulsion.
(B)
added
Ability to maneuver in a low gravity environment in deep space.
(8)
added
In January 2015 and July 2015, the NASA Advisory Council expressed its concern to NASA about the potential for growing costs for the program and highlighted that choices would need to be made about the program’s content.
(b)
changed
Considerations—Sense of Congress— In developing the detailed plan under subsection (a), It is the Administrator shall consider leveraging NASA's existing investments and technologies.sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the technological and scientific goals of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission may not be commensurate with the cost; and
(2)
added
alternative missions may provide a more cost effective and scientifically beneficial means to demonstrate the technologies needed for a human mission to Mars that would otherwise be demonstrated by the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission.
(c)
added
Evaluation and report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall—
(1)
added
conduct an evaluation of—
(A)
added
alternative approaches to the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission for demonstrating the technologies and capabilities needed for a human mission to Mars that would otherwise be demonstrated by the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission;
(B)
added
the scientific and technical benefits of the alternative approaches under subparagraph (A) to future human space exploration compared to scientific and technical benefits of the Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission;
(C)
added
the commercial benefits of the alternative approaches identified in subparagraph (A), including the impact on the development of domestic solar electric propulsion technology to bolster United States competitiveness in the global marketplace; and
(D)
added
a comparison of the estimated costs of the alternative approaches identified in subparagraph (A); and
(2)
added
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the evaluation under paragraph (1), including any recommendations.
Sec. 435
Mars 2033 report
(a)
changed
Findings—In general— Congress makes Not later than 120 days after the following findings:date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall contract with an independent, non-governmental systems engineering and technical assistance organization to study a Mars human space flight mission to be launched in 2033.
(1)
removed
NASA initially estimated that the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission would launch in December 2020 and cost no more than $1.25 billion, excluding launch and operations.
(2)
removed
On July 15, 2016, NASA conducted its Key Decision Point–B review of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission or approval for Phase B in mission formulation.
(3)
removed
During the Key Decision Point–B review, NASA estimated that costs have grown to $1.4 billion excluding launch and operations for a launch in December 2021 and the agency must evaluate whether to accept the increase or reduce the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission’s scope to stay within the cost cap set by the Administrator.
(4)
removed
In April 2015, the NASA Advisory Council—
(A)
removed
issued a finding that—
(i)
removed
high-performance solar electric propulsion will likely be an important part of an architecture to send humans to Mars; and
(ii)
removed
maneuvering a large test mass is not necessary to provide a valid in-space test of a new solar electric propulsion stage;
(B)
removed
determined that a solar electric propulsion mission will contribute more directly to the goal of sending humans to Mars if the mission is focused entirely on development and validation of the solar electric propulsion stage; and
(C)
removed
determined that other possible motivations for acquiring and maneuvering a boulder, such as asteroid science and planetary defense, do not have value commensurate with their probable cost.
(5)
removed
The Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission is competing for resources with other critical exploration development programs, including the Space Launch System, Orion, commercial crew, and a habitation module.
(6)
removed
In 2014, the NASA Advisory Council recommended that NASA conduct an independent cost and technical assessment of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission.
(7)
removed
NASA completed the assessment under paragraph (6) and reviewed it as part of the agency’s Key Decision Point–B review.
(8)
removed
In 2015, the NASA Advisory Council recommended that NASA preserve the following key objectives if the program needed to be descoped:
(A)
removed
Development of high power solar electric propulsion.
(B)
removed
Ability to maneuver in a low gravity environment in deep space.
(9)
removed
In January 2015 and July 2015, the NASA Advisory Council expressed its concern to NASA about the potential for growing costs for the program and highlighted that choices would need to be made about the program’s content.
(b)
changed
Sense of Congress—Contents— It is the sense of Congress that—The study shall include—
(1)
changed
the technological a technical development, test, fielding, and scientific goals of the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission may not be commensurate with operations plan using the cost; andSpace Launch System, Orion, and other systems to successfully launch such a Mars human space flight mission by 2033;
(2)
changed
alternative missions may provide a more an annual budget profile, including cost effective estimates, for the technical development, test, fielding, and scientifically beneficial means operations plan to demonstrate the technologies needed for carry out a Mars human space flight mission to Mars that would otherwise be demonstrated by the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission.2033; and
(3)
added
a comparison of the annual budget profile to the 5-year budget profile contained in the President’s budget request for fiscal year 2017 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code.
(c)
changed
Evaluation and report—Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall—shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the study, including findings and recommendations regarding the Mars 2033 human space flight mission described in subsection (a).
(d)
added
Assessment— Not later than 60 days after the date the report is submitted under subsection (c), the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment by the NASA Advisory Council of whether the proposal for a Mars human space flight mission to be launched in 2033 is in the strategic interests of the United States in space exploration.
(1)
removed
conduct an evaluation of—
(A)
removed
alternative approaches to the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission for demonstrating the technologies and capabilities needed for a human mission to Mars that would otherwise be demonstrated by the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission;
(B)
removed
the scientific and technical benefits of the alternatives approaches identified in subparagraph (A) compared to the Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission to future human exploration;
(C)
removed
the commercial benefits of the alternative approaches identified in subparagraph (A), including the impact on the development of domestic solar electric propulsion technology to bolster United States competitiveness in the global marketplace; and
(D)
removed
a comparison of the estimated costs of the alternative approaches identified in subparagraph (A); and
(2)
removed
submit to the appropriate Committees of Congress a report on the evaluation under paragraph (1), including any recommendations.
changed
This subtitle may be cited as the “Scott Kelly Human Spaceflight “To Research, Evaluate, Assess, and Exploration Treat Astronauts Act” or the “TREAT Astronauts Act”.
Sec. 442
Findings; sense of Congress
(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
Human space exploration can pose significant challenges and is full of substantial risk, which has ultimately claimed the lives of 24 National Aeronautics and Space Administration astronauts serving in the line of duty.
(2)
changed
As United States government astronauts participate in long-duration and exploration spaceflight space flight missions they may experience increased health risks, such as vision impairment, bone demineralization, and behavioral health and performance risks, and may be exposed to galactic cosmic radiation. Exposure to high levels of radiation and microgravity can result in acute and long-term health consequences that can increase the risk of cancer and tissue degeneration and have potential effects on the musculoskeletal system, central nervous system, cardiovascular system, immune function, and vision.
(3)
changed
To advance the goal of long-duration and exploration spaceflight space flight missions, United States government astronaut Scott Kelly participated in a 1-year twins study in space while his identical twin brother, former United States government astronaut Mark Kelly, acted as a human control specimen on Earth, providing an understanding of the physical, behavioral, microbiological, and molecular reaction of the human body to an extended period of time in space.
(4)
changed
Since the Administration currently provides medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment for United States government astronauts during their active employment, given the unknown long-term health consequences of long-duration space exploration, the Administration has requested statutory authority from Congress to provide medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment to former crewmembers of human space flights United States government astronauts for psychological and medical conditions associated with human space flight.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
changed
the United States should continue to seek the unknown and lead the world in space exploration and scientific discovery as the Administration prepares for long-duration and exploration spaceflight space flight in deep space and an eventual mission to Mars;
(2)
data relating to the health of astronauts will become increasingly valuable to improving our understanding of many diseases humans face on Earth;
(3)
changed
the Administration should provide the type of monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment described in subsection (a) only for conditions the Administration considers unique to the training or exposure to the spaceflight space flight environment of crewmembers of human space flights United States government astronauts and should not require any former crewmembers United States Government astronauts to participate in the Administration’s monitoring;
(4)
changed
such monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment should not replace a former crewmember’s United States government astronaut's private health insurance;
(5)
changed
expanded data acquired from such monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment should be used to tailor treatment, inform the requirements for new spaceflight space flight medical hardware, and develop controls in order to prevent disease occurrence in the astronaut corps;corps; and
(6)
removed
the Administration's existing radiation exposure standards, which have been used for missions pertaining to the Space Shuttle and the ISS, would limit missions to durations of 150 to 250 days and would pose significant challenges to long-duration or exploration spaceflight or a multiyear mission to Mars; and
(6)
renumbered
was (3)(9)
the 340-day space mission of Scott Kelly aboard the ISS—
(A)
renumbered
was (3)(9)(2)
was pivotal for the goal of the United States for humans to explore deep space and Mars as the mission generated new insight into how the human body adjusts to weightlessness, isolation, radiation, and the stress of long-duration space flight; and
(B)
renumbered
was (3)(9)(3)
will help support the physical and mental well-being of astronauts during longer space exploration missions in the future.
Sec. 443
Medical monitoring and research relating to human space flight
(a)
changed
In general— Subchapter III of chapter 201 of title 51, United States Code, as amended by section 305 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
changed
“20148. “20149. Medical monitoring and research relating to human space flight
changed
“(a) In general—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator may provide for the medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of a United States government astronaut, or a former United States government astronaut or payload specialist for conditions that the Administrator considers associated with human space flight, including scientific and medical tests for psychological and medical conditions.for—
changed
“(b) Exclusions—The “(1) the medical monitoring and diagnosis of a former United States government astronaut or a former payload specialist for conditions that the Administrator may not—considers potentially associated with human space flight; and
changed
“(1) provide for medical monitoring, diagnosis, or “(2) the treatment of a United States government astronaut, or a former United States government astronaut or a former payload specialist under subsection (a) for any psychological or medical condition conditions that is not the Administrator considers associated with human space flight; orflight, including scientific and medical tests for psychological and medical conditions.
changed
“(2) require a former United States government astronaut or payload specialist to participate in the monitoring authorized under subsection (a).“(b) Requirements
changed
“(c) Privacy—Consistent with applicable provisions of law relating to privacy, the Administrator shall protect the privacy of all “(1) No cost sharing—The medical records generated under monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment described in subsection (a) and accessible to the Administration.shall be provided without any deductible, copayment, or other cost sharing obligation.
changed
“(d) Regulations—The Administrator shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary “(2) Access to carry out this section.”local services—The medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment described in subsection (a) may be provided by a local health care provider if it is unadvisable due to the health of the applicable former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist for that former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist to travel to the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, as determined by the Administrator.
added
“(3) Secondary payment—Payment or reimbursement for the medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment described in subsection (a) shall be secondary to any obligation of the United States Government or any third party under any other provision of law or contractual agreement to pay for or provide such medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment. Any costs for items and services that may be provided by the Administrator for medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment under subsection (a) that are not paid for or provided under such other provision of law or contractual agreement, due to the application of deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, other cost sharing, or otherwise, are reimbursable by the Administrator on behalf of the former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist involved to the extent such items or services are authorized to be provided by the Administrator for such medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment under subsection (a).
added
“(4) Conditional payment—The Administrator may provide for conditional payments for or provide medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment described in subsection (a) that is obligated to be paid for or provided by the United States or any third party under any other provision of law or contractual agreement to pay for or provide such medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment if—
added
“(A) payment for (or the provision of) such medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment services has not been made (or provided) or cannot reasonably be expected to be made (or provided) promptly by the United States or such third party, respectively; and
added
“(B) such payment (or such provision of services) by the Administrator is conditioned on reimbursement by the United States or such third party, respectively, for such medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment.
added
“(c) Exclusions—The Administrator may not—
added
“(1) provide for medical monitoring or diagnosis of a former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist under subsection (a) for any psychological or medical condition that is not potentially associated with human space flight;
added
“(2) provide for treatment of a former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist under subsection (a) for any psychological or medical condition that is not associated with human space flight; or
added
“(3) require a former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist to participate in the medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment authorized under subsection (a).
added
“(d) Privacy—Consistent with applicable provisions of Federal law relating to privacy, the Administrator shall protect the privacy of all medical records generated under subsection (a) and accessible to the Administration.
added
“(e) Regulations—The Administrator shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section.
added
“(f) Definition of United States government astronaut—In this section, the term United States government astronaut has the meaning given the term government astronaut in section 50902, except it does not include an individual who is an international partner astronaut.
added
“(g) Data use and disclosure—The Administrator may use or disclose data acquired in the course of medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment of a former United States government astronaut or a former payload specialist under subsection (a), in accordance with subsection (d). Former United States government astronaut or former payload specialist participation in medical monitoring, diagnosis, or treatment under subsection (a) shall constitute consent for the Administrator to use or disclose such data.”
(b)
changed
Table of contents— The table of contents for chapter 201 of title 51, United States Code, as amended by section 305 of this Act, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 20147 20148 the following:
(c)
added
Annual reports—
(1)
added
In general— Each fiscal year, not later than the date of submission of the President's annual budget request for that fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Administrator shall publish a report, in accordance with applicable Federal privacy laws, on the activities of the Administration under section 20149 of title 51, United States Code.
(2)
added
Contents— Each report under paragraph (1) shall include a detailed cost accounting of the Administration's activities under section 20149 of title 51, United States Code, and a 5-year budget estimate.
(3)
added
Submission to Congress— The Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress each report under paragraph (1) not later than the date of submission of the President's annual budget request for that fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code.
(1)
added
Requirement— Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with an independent external organization to undertake an independent cost estimate of the cost to the Administration and the Federal Government to implement and administer the activities of the Administration under section 20149 of title 51, United States Code. The independent external organization may not be a NASA entity, such as the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance.
(2)
added
Submittal to Congress— Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the independent cost estimate under paragraph (1).
(1)
added
Study— The Administrator shall carry out a study on any potential privacy or legal issues related to the possible sharing beyond the Federal Government of data acquired under the activities of the Administration under section 20149 of title 51, United States Code.
(2)
added
Report— Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the results of the study carried out under paragraph (1).
(f)
added
Inspector General audit— The Inspector General of NASA shall periodically audit or review, as the Inspector General considers necessary to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse, the activities of the Administration under section 20149 of title 51, United States Code.
Sec. 501
Maintaining a balanced space science portfolio
(a)
changed
Science Sense of Congress on science portfolio— Section 803 of Congress reaffirms the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act sense of 2010 (Public Law 111–267; 124 Stat. 2832) is amended to read as follows:Congress that—
(1)
added
a balanced and adequately funded set of activities, consisting of research and analysis grant programs, technology development, suborbital research activities, and small, medium, and large space missions, contributes to a robust and productive science program and serves as a catalyst for innovation and discovery; and
(2)
added
the Administrator should set science priorities by following the guidance provided by the scientific community through the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's decadal surveys.
removed
“803. Overall science portfolio
removed
“Congress restates its sense that—
removed
“(1) a balanced and adequately funded set of activities, consisting of research and analysis grants programs, technology development, suborbital research activities, and small, medium, and large space missions, contributes to a robust and productive science program and serves as a catalyst for innovation and discovery; and
removed
“(2) the Administrator should set science priorities by following the guidance provided by the scientific community through the National Academy of Sciences’ decadal surveys.”
(b)
changed
Conforming amendment—Policy— The item relating to section 803 in It is the table of contents in section 1(b) policy of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–267; 124 Stat. 2806) is amended by striking “Overall science portfolio-sense of United States to ensure, to the Congress” extent practicable, a steady cadence of large, medium, and inserting “Overall small science portfolio”.missions.
Sec. 502
Planetary science
(a)
Findings— Congress finds that—
(1)
Administration support for planetary science is critical to enabling greater understanding of the solar system and the origin of the Earth;
(2)
the United States leads the world in planetary science and can augment its success in that area with appropriate international, academic, and industry partnerships;
(3)
a mix of small, medium, and large planetary science missions is required to sustain a steady cadence of planetary exploration; and
(4)
robotic planetary exploration is a key component of preparing for future human exploration.
(1)
changed
In general— In accordance with the priorities established in the most recent decadal survey for planetary science, Planetary Science Decadal Survey, the Administrator shall ensure, to the greatest extent practicable, the completion of a balanced set of Discovery, New Frontiers, and flagship missions.Flagship missions at the cadence recommended by the most recent Planetary Science Decadal Survey.
(2)
Mission priority adjustments— Consistent with the set of missions described in paragraph (1), and while maintaining the continuity of scientific data and steady development of capabilities and technologies, the Administrator may seek, if necessary, adjustments to mission priorities, schedule, and scope in light of changing budget projections.
Sec. 503
James Webb Space Telescope
added
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the James Webb Space Telescope will—
(A)
added
significantly advance our understanding of star and planet formation, and improve our knowledge of the early universe; and
(B)
added
support United States leadership in astrophysics;
(2)
added
consistent with annual Government Accountability Office reviews of the James Webb Space Telescope program, the Administrator should continue robust surveillance of the performance of the James Webb Space Telescope project and continue to improve the reliability of cost estimates and contractor performance data and other major space flight projects in order to enhance NASA’s ability to successfully deliver the James Webb Space Telescope on-time and within budget;
(3)
added
the on-time and on-budget delivery of the James Webb Space Telescope is a high congressional priority; and
(4)
added
the Administrator should ensure that integrated testing is appropriately timed and sufficiently comprehensive to enable potential issues to be identified and addressed early enough to be handled within the James Webb Space Telescope’s development schedule and prior to its launch.
(a)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
the James Webb Space Telescope should significantly advance our understanding of star and planet formation, improve our knowledge of the early universe, and support United States leadership in astrophysics; and
(2)
removed
consistent with annual Government Accountability Office reviews of the James Webb Space Telescope program, the Administrator should continue robust surveillance of the performance of the James Webb Space Telescope project and continue to improve the reliability of cost estimates and contractor performance data and other major spaceflight projects in order to enhance NASA’s ability to successfully deliver the James Webb Space Telescope on-time and within budget.
Sec. 504
Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (referred to in this section as “WFIRST”) mission has the potential to enable scientific discoveries that will transform our understanding of the universe; and
removed
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (commonly known as “WFIRST”) mission has the potential to enable scientific discoveries that will transform our understanding of the universe; and
(2)
renumbered
was (4)
the Administrator, to the extent practicable, should make progress on the technologies and capabilities needed to position the Administration to meet the objectives, as outlined in the 2010 National Academies’ Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, in a way that maximizes the scientific productivity of meeting those objectives for the resources invested.
(b)
added
Continuity of development— The Administrator shall ensure that the concept definition and pre-formulation activities of the WFIRST mission continue while the James Webb Space Telescope is being completed.
(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
changed
Studies of Europa, Jupiter's moon, indicate that Europa may provide a habitable environment, as it contains key ingredients known to support life on Earth, including liquid water, heat, chemistry, and time.life.
(2)
In 2012, using the Hubble Space Telescope, NASA scientists observed water vapor around the south polar region of Europa, which provides potential evidence of water plumes in that region.
(3)
For decades, the Europa mission has consistently ranked as a high priority mission for the scientific community.
(4)
The Europa mission was ranked as the top priority mission in the previous Planetary Science Decadal Survey and ranked as the second-highest priority in the current Planetary Science Decadal Survey.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Europa mission could provide another avenue in which to capitalize on our Nation’s current investment in the Space Launch System that would significantly reduce the transit time for such a deep space mission; and
(2)
a scientific, robotic exploration mission to Europa, as prioritized in both Planetary Science Decadal Surveys, should be supported.
Sec. 611
Information technology governance
removed
(a)
removed
In general— The Administrator, in consultation with the chief information officer of NASA, shall—
(1)
removed
ensure the NASA Chief Information Officer has a significant role in the management, governance, and oversight processes related to information technology operations and investments and information security programs for the protection of NASA systems;
(2)
removed
establish the NASA Chief Information Officer as a direct report to the Administrator;
(3)
removed
ensure the NASA Chief Information Officer has the appropriate resources and insight to oversee NASA information technology and information security operations and investments;
(4)
removed
provide an information technology program management framework to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of information technology investments, including relying on metrics for identifying and reducing potential duplication, waste, and cost;
(5)
removed
establish a monetary threshold for all agency information technology investments and related contracts, including non-highly and highly specialized and specialized information technology, regardless of the procurement instrument, over which the NASA Chief Information Officer shall have final approval;
(6)
removed
improve the operational linkage between the NASA Chief Information Officer and each NASA mission directorate, center, and mission support office to ensure both agency and mission needs are considered in agency-wide information technology and information security management and oversight;
(7)
removed
review the portfolio of information technology investments and spending, including information technology-related investments included as part of activities within NASA mission directorates that may not be considered information technology, to ensure investments are recognized and reported appropriately based on guidance from the Office of Management and Budget;
(8)
removed
consider appropriate revisions to the charters of information technology boards and councils that inform information technology investment and operation decisions; and
(9)
removed
consider whether the Chief Information Officer should have a seat on any boards or councils described in paragraph (8).
Sec. 612
Information technology strategic plan
removed
(a)
removed
In general— Subject to subsection (b), the NASA Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officer of each Administration center, shall develop an information technology strategic plan to guide NASA information technology management and strategic objectives.
(b)
removed
Requirements— In developing the strategic plan, the NASA Chief Information Officer shall ensure that the strategic plan is consistent with—
(1)
removed
the deadline under section 306(a) of title 5, United States Code; and
(2)
removed
the requirements under section 3506 of title 44, United States Code.
(c)
removed
Contents— The strategic plan shall include—
(1)
removed
near and long-term goals and objectives for leveraging information technology;
(2)
removed
a plan for how the NASA Chief Information Officer will submit to Congress of a list of information technology projects, including completion dates and risk level in accordance with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget;
(3)
removed
an implementation overview for an agency-wide centralized approach to information technology investments and operations, including reducing barriers to cross-center collaboration;
(4)
removed
coordination by the NASA Chief Information Officer with centers and mission directorates to ensure that information technology policies are effectively and efficiently implemented across the agency;
(5)
removed
a plan to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of information technology investments, including a description of how unnecessarily duplicative, wasteful, legacy, or outdated information technology across NASA will be identified and eliminated, and a schedule for the identification and elimination of such information technology;
(6)
removed
a plan for improving the information security of agency information and agency information systems, including improving security control assessments and role-based security training of employees; and
(7)
removed
submission by the NASA Chief Information Officer to Congress of information regarding high risk projects and cybersecurity risks.
(d)
removed
Congressional oversight— The NASA Chief Information Officer shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the strategic plan under subsection (a) and any updates thereto.
Sec. 613
Cybersecurity
removed
(a)
removed
Finding— The security of NASA information and information systems is vital to the success of the mission of the agency.
(b)
removed
Information security plan— Section 1207 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18445) is amended—
(1)
removed
by redesignating subsections (a) through (c) as subsections (b) through (d), respectively;
(2)
removed
by inserting before subsection (b), as redesignated, the following:
removed
“(a) Agency-Wide information security plan
removed
“(1) In general—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016, the Administrator shall implement the information security plan developed under paragraph (2) and take such further actions as the Administrator considers necessary to improve the information security system in accordance with this section.
removed
“(2) Information security plan—Subject to paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), the chief information officer of NASA, shall develop an agency-wide information security plan to enhance information security for NASA information and information infrastructure.
removed
“(3) Requirements—In developing the plan under paragraph (2), the chief information officer shall ensure that the plan—
removed
“(A) is consistent with policies, standards, guidelines, and directives on information security under subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code;
removed
“(B) is consistent with the standards and guidelines under section 11331 of title 40, United States Code; and
removed
“(C) meets applicable National Institute of Standards and Technology information security standards and guidelines.
removed
“(4) Approval—The chief information officer shall submit the plan to the Administrator for approval prior to its implementation.
removed
“(5) Contents—The plan shall include—
removed
“(A) an overview of the requirements of the information security system;
removed
“(B) an agency-wide risk management framework for information security;
removed
“(C) a description of the information security system management controls and common controls that are necessary to ensure compliance with information security-related requirements;
removed
“(D) an identification and assignment of roles, responsibilities, and management commitment for information security at the agency;
removed
“(E) coordination among organizational entities, including between each center, facility, mission directorate, and mission support office, and among agency entities responsible for different aspects of information security;
removed
“(F) heightened consideration of the need to protect the information security of mission-critical systems and activities and high-impact and moderate-impact information systems; and
removed
“(G) a schedule of frequent reviews and updates, as necessary, of the plan.”
(3)
removed
in subsection (b), as redesignated—
(A)
removed
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
removed
in subparagraph (B), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(ii)
removed
in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(iii)
removed
by adding at the end the following:
removed
“(D) an update on the agency’s efforts to apply additional information security protections to secure high-impact and moderate-impact information systems and mission-critical systems and activities, including those systems that control spacecraft and maintain critical data sources.”
(B)
removed
in paragraph (2), by striking “section 3545” and inserting “section 3555”.
Sec. 614
Oversight implementation progress
removed
removed
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and periodically thereafter until the information security plan under section 1207 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18445), as amended, is developed and implemented agency-wide, the Administrator shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress an update on the progress made toward implementation of or response to—
(1)
removed
the information security plan under that section; and
(2)
removed
the information security-related recommendations made by the NASA Inspector General and the Comptroller General in the 5 years preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
Sec. 615
Software oversight
removed
removed
The Administrator shall—
(1)
removed
develop a strategic plan to transition NASA from legacy software by adopting a service-based acquisition model in line with industry best practices;
(2)
removed
develop and implement an agency-wide software license management policy to improve centralization, lifecycle management, and procurement education, including education on contract negotiations, relevant laws and regulations, and agency-wide contract terms and conditions; and
(3)
removed
direct an agency-wide inventory of NASA's total software licenses and spending, including costs, benefits, usage, and trending data.
Sec. 616
Security management of foreign national access
removed
removed
The Administrator shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress when the agency has implemented the information technology security recommendations from the National Academy of Public Administration on foreign national access management, based on reports from January 2014 and March 2016.
Sec. 617
Cybersecurity of web applications
removed
removed
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the NASA Chief Information Officer shall—
(1)
removed
develop a plan, including such actions and milestones as are necessary, to fully remediate security vulnerabilities of NASA web applications within a timely fashion after discovery; and
(2)
removed
implement the recommendation from the NASA Inspector General in the audit report dated July 10, 2014, (IG–14–023) to remove from the Internet or secure with a web application firewall all NASA web applications in development or testing mode.
Sec. 621
Collaboration among mission directorates
removed
removed
The Administrator shall encourage an interdisciplinary approach among all NASA mission directorates and divisions, whenever appropriate, for projects or missions—
(1)
removed
to improve coordination, and encourage collaboration and early planning on scope;
(2)
removed
to determine areas of overlap or alignment;
(3)
removed
to find ways to leverage across divisional perspectives to maximize the outcomes; and
(4)
removed
to be more efficient with resources and funds.
Sec. 622
NASA launch capabilities collaboration
removed
(a)
removed
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
removed
The Launch Services Program is responsible for the acquisition, management, and technical oversight of commercial launch services for NASA’s science and robotic missions.
(2)
removed
The Commercial Crew Program is responsible for the acquisition, management, and technical oversight of commercial crew transportation systems.
(3)
removed
The Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program have worked together to gain exceptional technical insight into the contracted launch service providers that are common to both programs.
(4)
removed
The Launch Services Program has a long history of oversight of 12 different launch vehicles and over 80 launches.
(5)
removed
Co-location of the Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program has enabled the Commercial Crew Program to efficiently obtain the launch vehicle technical expertise of and provide engineering and analytical support to the Commercial Crew Program.
(b)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
the Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program each benefit from communication and coordination of launch manifests, technical information, and common launch vehicle insight between the programs; and
(2)
removed
such communication and coordination is enabled by the co-location of the programs.
(c)
removed
In general— The Administrator shall pursue a strategy for acquisition of crewed transportation services and non-crewed launch services that continues to enhance communication, collaboration, and coordination between the Launch Services Program and the Commercial Crew Program.
Sec. 623
Commercial space launch cooperation
removed
(a)
removed
Finding— Congress recognized the benefit of commercial space launch cooperation between the Federal Government and the private sector when it granted the Secretary of Defense authority to foster cooperation between the Department of Defense and certain covered entities relating to space transportation infrastructure under section 2276 of title 10, United States Code.
(b)
removed
In general— Chapter 505 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
removed
“50507. Commercial launch cooperation
removed
“(a) Authority for agreements relating to space transportation infrastructure—Notwithstanding section 50504, the Administrator—
removed
“(1) may enter into an agreement with a covered entity to provide the covered entity with support and services related to the space transportation infrastructure of the Administration—
removed
“(A) to maximize the use of the space transportation infrastructure of the Administration by the private sector in the United States; and
removed
“(B) to encourage commercial space activities by enabling investment by covered entities in the space transportation infrastructure of the Administration; and
removed
“(2) at the request of the covered entity, may include that support and services in the contracted space launch and reentry range support requirements of the Administration if—
removed
“(A) the Administrator determines that including that support and services in the requirements—
removed
“(i) is in the best interest of the Federal Government;
removed
“(ii) does not interfere with the requirements of the Administration; and
removed
“(iii) does not compete with the commercial space activities of other covered entities; and
removed
“(B) any commercial requirement included in the agreement has full non-Federal funding before the execution of the agreement.
removed
“(b) Contributions
removed
“(1) In general—The Administrator may enter into an agreement with a covered entity on a cooperative and voluntary basis to accept funds, services, and equipment to carry out the purposes in subsection (a)(1).
removed
“(2) Use of contributions—Any funds, services, or equipment accepted by the Administrator under this subsection—
removed
“(A) may be used only for the objectives specified in this section in accordance with terms of use set forth in the agreement entered into under this subsection; and
removed
“(B) shall be managed by the Administrator in accordance with regulations promulgated under subsection (d).
removed
“(3) Requirements with respect to agreements—An agreement entered into with a covered entity under this subsection shall—
removed
“(A) address the terms of use, ownership, and disposition of the funds, services, or equipment contributed under the agreement; and
removed
“(B) include a provision that the covered entity will not recover the costs of its contribution through any other agreement with the United States.
removed
“(c) Annual report—Not later than January 31 of each year, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the process used to establish agreements under subsections (a) and (b), including noticing announcements of opportunities and criteria for selecting a covered entity, and the funds, services, and equipment accepted and used by the Administrator under this section during the preceding fiscal year.
removed
“(d) Regulations—The Administrator shall promulgate regulations to carry out this section.
removed
“(e) Definitions—In this section:
removed
“(1) Covered entity—In this section, the term covered entity means—
removed
“(A) a non-Federal entity that—
removed
“(i) is organized under the laws of the United States or of any jurisdiction within the United States; and
removed
“(ii) is engaged in commercial space activities; or
removed
“(B) an entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a non-Federal entity described in subparagraph (A).
removed
“(2) Launch support facilities—The term launch support facilities has the meaning given the term in section 50501.
removed
“(3) Space recovery support facilities—The term space recovery support facilities has the meaning given the term in section 50501.
removed
“(4) Space transportation infrastructure—The term space transportation infrastructure has the meaning given that term in section 50501.”
(c)
removed
Table of contents— The table of contents for chapter 505 of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to section 50506 the following:
Sec. 624
Detection and avoidance of counterfeit parts
removed
(a)
removed
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
removed
A 2012 investigation by the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate of counterfeit electronic parts in the Department of Defense supply chain from 2009 through 2010 uncovered 1,800 cases and over one million counterfeit parts and exposed the threat such counterfeit parts pose to service members and national security.
(2)
removed
Since 2010, the Comptroller General of the United States has identified in 3 separate reports the risks and challenges associated with counterfeit parts and counterfeit prevention at both the Department of Defense and NASA, including inconsistent definitions of counterfeit parts, poorly targeted quality control practices, and potential barriers to improvements to these practices.
(b)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the presence of counterfeit electronic parts in the NASA supply chain poses a danger to United States government astronauts, crew, and other personnel and a risk to the agency overall.
(1)
removed
In general— Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall revise the NASA Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to improve the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts in the supply chain.
(2)
removed
Contractor responsibilities— In revising the regulations under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall—
(A)
removed
require each covered contractor—
(i)
removed
to detect and avoid the use or inclusion of any counterfeit parts in electronic parts or products that contain electronic parts; and
(ii)
removed
to take such corrective actions as the Administrator considers necessary to remedy the use or inclusion described in clause (i);
(iii)
removed
including a subcontractor, to notify the applicable NASA contracting officer not later than 30 calendar days after the date the covered contractor becomes aware, or has reason to suspect, that any end item, component, part or material contained in supplies purchased by NASA, or purchased by a covered contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, NASA, contains a counterfeit electronic part or suspect counterfeit electronic part;
(B)
removed
prohibit the cost of counterfeit electronic parts, suspect counterfeit electronic parts, and any corrective action described under subparagraph (A)(ii) from being included as allowable costs under agency contracts, unless—
(i)
removed
the covered contractor has an operational system to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts that has been reviewed and approved by NASA or the Department of Defense; and
(ii)
removed
the covered contractor has provided the notice under subparagraph (A)(iii); or
(iii)
removed
the counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts were provided to the covered contractor as Government property in accordance with part 45 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(3)
removed
Suppliers of electronic parts— In revising the regulations under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall—
(A)
removed
require NASA and covered contractors, including subcontractors, at all tiers—
(i)
removed
to obtain electronic parts that are in production or currently available in stock from—
(I)
removed
the original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers; or
(II)
removed
suppliers who obtain such parts exclusively from the original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers; and
(ii)
removed
to obtain electronic parts that are not in production or currently available in stock from suppliers that meet qualification requirements established under subparagraph (C);
(B)
removed
establish documented requirements consistent with published industry standards or Government contract requirements for—
(i)
removed
notification of the agency; and
(ii)
removed
inspection, testing, and authentication of electronic parts that NASA or a covered contractor, including a subcontractor, obtains from any source other than a source described in subparagraph (A);
(C)
removed
establish qualification requirements, consistent with the requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code, pursuant to which NASA may identify suppliers that have appropriate policies and procedures in place to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts; and
(D)
removed
authorize a covered contractor, including a subcontractor, to identify and use additional suppliers beyond those identified under subparagraph (C) if—
(i)
removed
the standards and processes for identifying such suppliers comply with established industry standards;
(ii)
removed
the covered contractor assumes responsibility for the authenticity of parts provided by such suppliers under paragraph (2); and
(iii)
removed
the selection of such suppliers is subject to review and audit by NASA.
(d)
removed
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
removed
Covered contractor— The term covered contractor means a contractor that supplies an electronic part, or a product that contains an electronic part, to NASA.
(2)
removed
Electronic part— The term electronic part means a discrete electronic component, including a microcircuit, transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode, that is intended for use in a safety or mission critical application.
Sec. 625
Education and outreach
removed
(a)
removed
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
removed
United States competitiveness in the 21st century requires engaging the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (referred to in this section as “STEM”) talent in all States;
(2)
removed
the Administration is uniquely positioned to educate and inspire students and the broader public on STEM subjects and careers;
(3)
removed
the Administration's Education Mission Directorates, along with the other mission directorates, have been effective in delivering educational content because of the strong engagement of Administration scientists and engineers in the Administration's education and outreach activities; and
(4)
removed
the Administration’s education and outreach programs, including the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) and the Space Grant College and Fellowship Program, reflect the Administration’s successful commitment to growing and diversifying the national science and engineering workforce.
(b)
removed
Continuation of education and outreach activities and programs—
(1)
removed
In general— The Administrator shall continue engagement with the public and education opportunities for students via all the Administration’s mission directorates to the maximum extent practicable.
(2)
removed
Report— Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Administration's near-term outreach plans for advancing space law education.
Sec. 507
Congressional declaration of policy and purpose
added
added
Section 20102(d) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
added
“(10) The search for life’s origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe.”
Sec. 508
Extrasolar planet exploration strategy
added
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies to develop a science strategy for the study and exploration of extrasolar planets, including the use of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, the James Webb Space Telescope, a potential Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope mission, or any other telescope, spacecraft, or instrument, as appropriate.
(2)
added
Requirements— The strategy shall—
(A)
added
outline key scientific questions;
(B)
added
identify the most promising research in the field;
(C)
added
indicate the extent to which the mission priorities in existing decadal surveys address the key extrasolar planet research and exploration goals;
(D)
added
identify opportunities for coordination with international partners, commercial partners, and not-for-profit partners; and
(E)
added
make recommendations regarding the activities under subparagraphs (A) through (D), as appropriate.
(b)
added
Use of strategy— The Administrator shall use the strategy—
(1)
added
to inform roadmaps, strategic plans, and other activities of the Administration as they relate to extrasolar planet research and exploration; and
(2)
added
to provide a foundation for future activities and initiatives related to extrasolar planet research and exploration.
(c)
added
Report to Congress— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Academies shall submit to the Administrator and to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the strategy developed under subsection (a).
Sec. 509
Astrobiology strategy
added
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies to develop a science strategy for astrobiology that would outline key scientific questions, identify the most promising research in the field, and indicate the extent to which the mission priorities in existing decadal surveys address the search for life’s origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the Universe.
(2)
added
Recommendations— The strategy shall include recommendations for coordination with international partners.
(b)
added
Use of strategy— The Administrator shall use the strategy developed under subsection (a) in planning and funding research and other activities and initiatives in the field of astrobiology.
(c)
added
Report to Congress— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Academies shall submit to the Administrator and to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the strategy developed under subsection (a).
Sec. 510
Astrobiology public-private partnerships
added
added
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing how the Administration can expand collaborative partnerships to study life’s origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe.
Sec. 511
Near-earth objects
added
added
Section 321 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (51 U.S.C. note prec. 71101) is amended by adding at the end the following:
added
“(e) Program report—The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016, an initial report that provides—
added
“(1) recommendations for carrying out the Survey program and an associated proposed budget;
added
“(2) an analysis of possible options that the Administration could employ to divert an object on a likely collision course with Earth; and
added
“(3) a description of the status of efforts to coordinate and cooperate with other countries to discover hazardous asteroids and comets, plan a mitigation strategy, and implement that strategy in the event of the discovery of an object on a likely collision course with Earth.
added
“(f) Annual reports—After the initial report under subsection (e), the Administrator shall annually transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report that includes—
added
“(1) a summary of all activities carried out under subsection (d) since the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016, including the progress toward achieving 90 percent completion of the survey described in subsection (d); and
added
“(2) a summary of expenditures for all activities carried out under subsection (d) since the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016.
added
“(g) Assessment—The Administrator, in collaboration with other relevant Federal agencies, shall carry out a technical and scientific assessment of the capabilities and resources—
added
“(1) to accelerate the survey described in subsection (d); and
added
“(2) to expand the Administration’s Near-Earth Object Program to include the detection, tracking, cataloguing, and characterization of potentially hazardous near-Earth objects less than 140 meters in diameter.
added
“(h) Transmittal—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2016, the Administrator shall transmit the results of the assessment under subsection (g) to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.”
Sec. 512
Near-Earth objects public-private partnerships
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Administration should seek to leverage the capabilities of the private sector and philanthropic organizations to the maximum extent practicable in carrying out the Near-Earth Object Survey Program in order to meet the goal of that program under section 321(d)(1) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (51 U.S.C. note prec. 71101(d)(1)).
(b)
added
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing how the Administration can expand collaborative partnerships to detect, track, catalogue, and categorize near-Earth objects.
Sec. 513
Assessment of science mission extensions
added
added
Section 30504 of title 51, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
added
“30504. Assessment of science mission extensions
added
“(a) Assessments
added
“(1) In general—The Administrator shall carry out triennial reviews within each of the Science divisions to assess the cost and benefits of extending the date of the termination of data collection for those missions that exceed their planned missions’ lifetime.
added
“(2) Considerations—In conducting an assessment under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall consider whether and how extending missions impacts the start of future missions.
added
“(b) Consultation and consideration of potential benefits of instruments on missions—When deciding whether to extend a mission that has an operational component, the Administrator shall—
added
“(1) consult with any affected Federal agency; and
added
“(2) take into account the potential benefits of instruments on missions that are beyond their planned mission lifetime.
added
“(c) Reports—The Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, at the same time as the submission to Congress of the Administration’s annual budget request for each fiscal year, a report detailing any assessment under subsection (a) that was carried out during the previous year.”
Sec. 514
Stratospheric observatory for infrared astronomy
added
added
The Administrator may not terminate science operations of the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy before December 31, 2017.
Sec. 515
Radioisotope power systems
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
exploration of the outer reaches of the solar system is enabled by radioisotope power systems;
(2)
added
establishing continuity in the production of the material needed for radioisotope power systems is essential to maintaining the availability of such systems for future deep space exploration missions; and
(3)
added
Federal agencies supporting the Administration through the production of such material should do so in a cost effective manner so as not to impose excessive reimbursement requirements on the Administration.
(b)
added
Analysis of requirements and risks— The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall conduct an analysis of—
(1)
added
the requirements of the Administration for radioisotope power system material that is needed to carry out planned, high priority robotic missions in the solar system and other surface exploration activities beyond low-Earth orbit; and
(2)
added
the risks to missions of the Administration in meeting those requirements, or any additional requirements, due to a lack of adequate radioisotope power system material.
(c)
added
Contents of analysis— The analysis conducted under subsection (b) shall—
(1)
added
detail the Administration’s current projected mission requirements and associated timeframes for radioisotope power system material;
(2)
added
explain the assumptions used to determine the Administration’s requirements for the material, including—
(A)
added
the planned use of advanced thermal conversion technology such as advanced thermocouples and Stirling generators and converters; and
(B)
added
the risks and implications of, and contingencies for, any delays or unanticipated technical challenges affecting or related to the Administration’s mission plans for the anticipated use of advanced thermal conversion technology;
(3)
added
assess the risk to the Administration’s programs of any potential delays in achieving the schedule and milestones for planned domestic production of radioisotope power system material;
(4)
added
outline a process for meeting any additional Administration requirements for the material;
(5)
added
estimate the incremental costs required to increase the amount of material produced each year, if such an increase is needed to support additional Administration requirements for the material;
(6)
added
detail how the Administration and other Federal agencies will manage, operate, and fund production facilities and the design and development of all radioisotope power systems used by the Administration and other Federal agencies as necessary;
(7)
added
specify the steps the Administration will take, in consultation with the Department of Energy, to preserve the infrastructure and workforce necessary for production of radioisotope power systems and ensure that its reimbursements to the Department of Energy associated with such preservation are equitable and justified; and
(8)
added
detail how the Administration has implemented or rejected the recommendations from the National Research Council’s 2009 report titled “Radioisotope Power Systems: An Imperative for Maintaining U.S. Leadership in Space Exploration.”
(d)
added
Report to Congress— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit the results of the analysis to the appropriate committees of Congress.
Sec. 516
Assessment of Mars architecture
added
(a)
added
Assessment— The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to assess—
(1)
added
the Administration’s Mars exploration architecture and its responsiveness to the strategies, priorities, and guidelines put forward by the National Academies’ planetary science decadal surveys and other relevant National Academies Mars-related reports;
(2)
added
the long-term goals of the Administration’s Mars Exploration Program and such program’s ability to optimize the science return, given the current fiscal posture of the program;
(3)
added
the Mars exploration architecture’s relationship to Mars-related activities to be undertaken by foreign agencies and organizations; and
(4)
added
the extent to which the Mars exploration architecture represents a reasonably balanced mission portfolio.
(b)
added
Report to Congress— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit the results of the assessment to the appropriate committees of Congress.
Sec. 517
Collaboration
added
added
The Administration shall continue to develop first-of-a-kind instruments that, once proved, can be transitioned to other agencies for operations. Whenever responsibilities for the development of sensors or for measurements are transferred to the Administration from another agency, the Administration shall seek, to the extent possible, to be reimbursed for the assumption of such responsibilities.
Sec. 601
Sense of Congress on aeronautics
added
added
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
a robust aeronautics research portfolio will help maintain the United States status as a leader in aviation, enhance the competitiveness of the United States in the world economy, and improve the quality of life of all citizens;
(2)
added
aeronautics research is essential to the Administration’s mission, continues to be an important core element of the Administration’s mission, and should be supported;
(3)
added
the Administrator should coordinate and consult with relevant Federal agencies and the private sector to minimize duplication of efforts and leverage resources; and
(4)
added
carrying aeronautics research to a level of maturity that allows the Administration’s research results to be transferred to the users, whether private or public sector, is critical to their eventual adoption.
Sec. 602
Transformative aeronautics research
added
added
It is the sense of Congress that the Administrator should look strategically into the future and ensure that the Administration’s Center personnel are at the leading edge of aeronautics research by encouraging investigations into the early-stage advancement of new processes, novel concepts, and innovative technologies that have the potential to meet national aeronautics needs.
Sec. 603
Hypersonic research
added
(a)
added
Roadmap for hypersonic research— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall develop and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a research and development roadmap for hypersonic aircraft research.
(b)
added
Objective— The objective of the roadmap is to explore hypersonic science and technology using air- breathing propulsion concepts, through a mix of theoretical work, basic and applied research, and development of flight research demonstration vehicles.
(c)
added
Contents— The roadmap shall recommend appropriate Federal agency contributions, coordination efforts, and technology milestones.
Sec. 604
Supersonic research
added
(a)
added
Findings— Congress finds that—
(1)
added
the ability to fly commercial aircraft over land at supersonic speeds without adverse impacts on the environment or on local communities could open new global markets and enable new transportation capabilities; and
(2)
added
continuing the Administration’s research program is necessary to assess the impact in a relevant environment of commercial supersonic flight operations and provide the basis for establishing appropriate sonic boom standards for such flight operations.
(b)
added
Roadmap for supersonic research—
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a roadmap that allows for flexible funding profiles for supersonic aeronautics research and development.
(2)
added
Objective— The objective of the roadmap is to develop and demonstrate, in a relevant environment, airframe and propulsion technologies to minimize the environmental impact, including noise, of supersonic overland flight in an efficient and economical manner.
(3)
added
Contents— The roadmap shall include—
(A)
added
the baseline research as embodied by the Administration’s existing research on supersonic flight;
(B)
added
a list of specific technological, environmental, and other challenges that must be overcome to minimize the environmental impact, including noise, of supersonic overland flight;
(C)
added
a research plan to address the challenges under subparagraph (B), including a project timeline for accomplishing relevant research goals;
(D)
added
a plan for coordination with stakeholders, including relevant government agencies and industry; and
(E)
added
a plan for how the Administration will ensure that sonic boom research is coordinated as appropriate with relevant Federal agencies.
Sec. 605
Rotorcraft research
added
(a)
added
Roadmap for rotorcraft research— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall prepare and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a roadmap for research relating to rotorcraft and other runway-independent air vehicles.
(b)
added
Objective— The objective of the roadmap is to develop and demonstrate improved safety, noise, and environmental impact in a relevant environment.
(c)
added
Contents— The roadmap shall include specific goals for the research, a timeline for implementation, metrics for success, and guidelines for collaboration and coordination with industry and other Federal agencies.
Sec. 701
Space technology infusion
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress on space technology— It is the sense of Congress that space technology is critical—
(1)
added
to developing technologies and capabilities that will make the Administration’s core missions more affordable and more reliable;
(2)
added
to enabling a new class of Administration missions beyond low-Earth orbit; and
(3)
added
to improving technological capabilities and promote innovation for the Administration and the Nation.
(b)
added
Sense of Congress on propulsion technology— It is the sense of Congress that advancing propulsion technology would improve the efficiency of trips to Mars and could shorten travel time to Mars, reduce astronaut health risks, and reduce radiation exposure, consumables, and mass of materials required for the journey.
(c)
added
Policy— It is the policy of the United States that the Administrator shall develop technologies to support the Administration’s core missions, as described in section 2(3) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301(3)), and support sustained investments in early stage innovation, fundamental research, and technologies to expand the boundaries of the national aerospace enterprise.
(d)
added
Propulsion technologies— A goal of propulsion technologies developed under subsection (c) shall be to significantly reduce human travel time to Mars.
Sec. 702
Space technology program
added
(a)
added
Space technology program authorized— The Administrator shall conduct a space technology program (referred to in this section as the “Program”) to research and develop advanced space technologies that could deliver innovative solutions across the Administration's space exploration and science missions.
(b)
added
Considerations— In conducting the Program, the Administrator shall consider—
(1)
added
the recommendations of the National Academies’ review of the Administration’s Space Technology roadmaps and priorities; and
(2)
added
the applicable enabling aspects of the stepping stone approach to exploration under section 70504 of title 51, United States Code.
(c)
added
Requirements— In conducting the Program, the Administrator shall—
(1)
added
to the extent practicable, use a competitive process to select research and development projects;
(2)
added
to the extent practicable and appropriate, use small satellites and the Administration’s suborbital and ground-based platforms to demonstrate space technology concepts and developments; and
(3)
added
as appropriate, partner with other Federal agencies, universities, private industry, and foreign countries.
(d)
added
Small business programs— The Administrator shall organize and manage the Administration’s Small Business Innovation Research Program and Small Business Technology Transfer Program within the Program.
(e)
added
Nonduplication certification— The Administrator shall submit a budget for each fiscal year, as transmitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, that avoids duplication of projects, programs, or missions conducted by Program with other projects, programs, or missions conducted by another office or directorate of the Administration.
(f)
added
Collaboration, coordination, and alignment—
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall—
(A)
added
ensure that the Administration’s projects, programs, and activities in support of technology research and development of advanced space technologies are fully coordinated and aligned;
(B)
added
ensure that the results the projects, programs, and activities under subparagraph (A) are shared and leveraged within the Administration; and
(C)
added
ensure that the organizational responsibility for research and development activities in support of human space exploration not initiated as of the date of enactment of this Act is established on the basis of a sound rationale.
(2)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that projects, programs, and missions being conducted by the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate in support of research and development of advanced space technologies and systems focusing on human space exploration should continue in that Directorate.
(g)
added
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress a report—
(1)
added
comparing the Administration’s space technology investments with the high-priority technology areas identified by the National Academies in the National Research Council’s report on the Administration’s Space Technology Roadmaps; and
(A)
added
identification of how the Administration will address any gaps between the agency’s investments and the recommended technology areas, including a projection of funding requirements; and
(B)
added
identification of the rationale described in subsection (f)(1)(C).
(h)
added
Annual report— The Administrator shall include in the Administration’s annual budget request for each fiscal year the rationale for assigning organizational responsibility for, in the year prior to the budget fiscal year, each initiated project, program, and mission focused on research and development of advanced technologies for human space exploration.
Sec. 811
Information technology governance
added
(a)
added
In general— The Administrator shall, in a manner that reflects the unique nature of NASA's mission and expertise—
(1)
added
ensure the NASA Chief Information Officer, Mission Directorates, and Centers have appropriate roles in the management, governance, and oversight processes related to information technology operations and investments and information security programs for the protection of NASA systems;
(2)
added
ensure the NASA Chief Information Officer has the appropriate resources and insight to oversee NASA information technology and information security operations and investments;
(3)
added
provide an information technology program management framework to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of information technology investments, including relying on metrics for identifying and reducing potential duplication, waste, and cost;
(4)
added
improve the operational linkage between the NASA Chief Information Officer and each NASA mission directorate, center, and mission support office to ensure both agency and mission needs are considered in agency-wide information technology and information security management and oversight;
(5)
added
review the portfolio of information technology investments and spending, including information technology-related investments included as part of activities within NASA mission directorates that may not be considered information technology, to ensure investments are recognized and reported appropriately based on guidance from the Office of Management and Budget;
(6)
added
consider appropriate revisions to the charters of information technology boards and councils that inform information technology investment and operation decisions; and
(7)
added
consider whether the NASA Chief Information Officer should have a seat on any boards or councils described in paragraph (6).
(1)
added
Study— The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of the effectiveness of the Administration’s Information Technology Governance in ensuring information technology resources are aligned with agency missions and are cost effective and secure.
(2)
added
Contents— The study shall include an assessment of—
(A)
added
the resources available for overseeing Administration-wide information technology operations, investments, and security measures and the NASA Chief Information Officer’s visibility and involvement into information technology oversight and access to those resources;
(B)
added
the effectiveness and challenges of the Administration’s information technology structure, decision making processes and authorities, including impacts on its ability to implement information security; and
(C)
added
the impact of NASA Chief Information Officer approval authority over information technology investments that exceed a defined monetary threshold, including any potential impacts of such authority on the Administration’s missions, flights programs and projects, research activities, and Center operations.
(3)
added
Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report detailing the results of the study under paragraph (1), including any recommendations.
Sec. 812
Information technology strategic plan
added
(a)
added
In general— Subject to subsection (b), the Administrator shall develop an information technology strategic plan to guide NASA information technology management and strategic objectives.
(b)
added
Requirements— In developing the strategic plan, the Administrator shall ensure that the strategic plan addresses—
(1)
added
the deadline under section 306(a) of title 5, United States Code; and
(2)
added
the requirements under section 3506 of title 44, United States Code.
(c)
added
Contents— The strategic plan shall address, in a manner that reflects the unique nature of NASA's mission and expertise—
(1)
added
near and long-term goals and objectives for leveraging information technology;
(2)
added
a plan for how NASA will submit to Congress of a list of information technology projects, including completion dates and risk level in accordance with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget;
(3)
added
an implementation overview for an agency-wide approach to information technology investments and operations, including reducing barriers to cross-center collaboration;
(4)
added
coordination by the NASA Chief Information Officer with centers and mission directorates to ensure that information technology policies are effectively and efficiently implemented across the agency;
(5)
added
a plan to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of information technology investments, including a description of how unnecessarily duplicative, wasteful, legacy, or outdated information technology across NASA will be identified and eliminated, and a schedule for the identification and elimination of such information technology;
(6)
added
a plan for improving the information security of agency information and agency information systems, including improving security control assessments and role-based security training of employees; and
(7)
added
submission by NASA to Congress of information regarding high risk projects and cybersecurity risks.
(d)
added
Congressional oversight— The Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the strategic plan under subsection (a) and any updates thereto.
Sec. 813
Cybersecurity
added
(a)
added
Finding— The security of NASA information and information systems is vital to the success of the mission of the agency.
(b)
added
Information security plan—
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall implement the information security plan developed under paragraph (2) and take such further actions as the Administrator considers necessary to improve the information security system in accordance with this section.
(2)
added
Information security plan— Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the Administrator shall develop an agency-wide information security plan to enhance information security for NASA information and information infrastructure.
(3)
added
Requirements— In developing the plan under paragraph (2), the Administrator shall ensure that the plan—
(A)
added
reflects the unique nature of NASA's mission and expertise;
(B)
added
is informed by policies, standards, guidelines, and directives on information security required for Federal agencies;
(C)
added
is consistent with the standards and guidelines under section 11331 of title 40, United States Code; and
(D)
added
meets applicable National Institute of Standards and Technology information security standards and guidelines.
(4)
added
Contents— The plan shall address—
(A)
added
an overview of the requirements of the information security system;
(B)
added
an agency-wide risk management framework for information security;
(C)
added
a description of the information security system management controls and common controls that are necessary to ensure compliance with information security-related requirements;
(D)
added
an identification and assignment of roles, responsibilities, and management commitment for information security at the agency;
(E)
added
coordination among organizational entities, including between each center, facility, mission directorate, and mission support office, and among agency entities responsible for different aspects of information security;
(F)
added
the need to protect the information security of mission-critical systems and activities and high-impact and moderate-impact information systems; and
(G)
added
a schedule of frequent reviews and updates, as necessary, of the plan.
Sec. 814
Security management of foreign national access
added
added
The Administrator shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress when the agency has implemented the information technology security recommendations from the National Academy of Public Administration on foreign national access management, based on reports from January 2014 and March 2016.
Sec. 815
Cybersecurity of web applications
added
added
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall, in a manner that reflects the unique nature of NASA's mission and expertise—
(1)
added
develop a plan, including such actions and milestones as are necessary, to fully remediate security vulnerabilities of NASA web applications within a timely fashion after discovery; and
(2)
added
provide an update on its plant to implement the recommendation from the NASA Inspector General in the audit report dated July 10, 2014, (IG–14–023) to remove from the Internet or otherwise secure all NASA web applications in development or testing mode.
Sec. 821
Collaboration among mission directorates
added
added
The Administrator shall encourage an interdisciplinary approach among all NASA mission directorates and divisions, whenever appropriate, for projects or missions—
(1)
added
to improve coordination, and encourage collaboration and early planning on scope;
(2)
added
to determine areas of overlap or alignment;
(3)
added
to find ways to leverage across divisional perspectives to maximize outcomes; and
(4)
added
to be more efficient with resources and funds.
Sec. 822
NASA launch capabilities collaboration
added
(a)
added
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added
The Launch Services Program is responsible for the acquisition, management, and technical oversight of commercial launch services for NASA’s science and robotic missions.
(2)
added
The Commercial Crew Program is responsible for the acquisition, management, and technical oversight of commercial crew transportation systems.
(3)
added
The Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program have worked together to gain exceptional technical insight into the contracted launch service providers that are common to both programs.
(4)
added
The Launch Services Program has a long history of oversight of 12 different launch vehicles and over 80 launches.
(5)
added
Co-location of the Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program has enabled the Commercial Crew Program to efficiently obtain the launch vehicle technical expertise of and provide engineering and analytical support to the Commercial Crew Program.
(b)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the Launch Services Program and Commercial Crew Program each benefit from communication and coordination of launch manifests, technical information, and common launch vehicle insight between the programs; and
(2)
added
such communication and coordination is enabled by the co-location of the programs.
(c)
added
In general— The Administrator shall pursue a strategy for acquisition of crewed transportation services and non-crewed launch services that continues to enhance communication, collaboration, and coordination between the Launch Services Program and the Commercial Crew Program.
Sec. 823
Detection and avoidance of counterfeit parts
added
(a)
added
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added
A 2012 investigation by the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate of counterfeit electronic parts in the Department of Defense supply chain from 2009 through 2010 uncovered 1,800 cases and over 1,000,000 counterfeit parts and exposed the threat such counterfeit parts pose to service members and national security.
(2)
added
Since 2010, the Comptroller General of the United States has identified in 3 separate reports the risks and challenges associated with counterfeit parts and counterfeit prevention at both the Department of Defense and NASA, including inconsistent definitions of counterfeit parts, poorly targeted quality control practices, and potential barriers to improvements to these practices.
(b)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the presence of counterfeit electronic parts in the NASA supply chain poses a danger to United States government astronauts, crew, and other personnel and a risk to the agency overall.
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall revise the NASA Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to improve the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts in the supply chain.
(2)
added
Contractor responsibilities— In revising the regulations under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall—
(A)
added
require each covered contractor—
(i)
added
to detect and avoid the use or inclusion of any counterfeit parts in electronic parts or products that contain electronic parts;
(ii)
added
to take such corrective actions as the Administrator considers necessary to remedy the use or inclusion described in clause (i); and
(iii)
added
including a subcontractor, to notify the applicable NASA contracting officer not later than 30 calendar days after the date the covered contractor becomes aware, or has reason to suspect, that any end item, component, part or material contained in supplies purchased by NASA, or purchased by a covered contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, NASA, contains a counterfeit electronic part or suspect counterfeit electronic part; and
(B)
added
prohibit the cost of counterfeit electronic parts, suspect counterfeit electronic parts, and any corrective action described under subparagraph (A)(ii) from being included as allowable costs under agency contracts, unless—
(I)
added
the covered contractor has an operational system to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts that has been reviewed and approved by NASA or the Department of Defense; and
(II)
added
the covered contractor has provided the notice under subparagraph (A)(iii); or
(ii)
added
the counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts were provided to the covered contractor as Government property in accordance with part 45 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(3)
added
Suppliers of electronic parts— In revising the regulations under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall—
(A)
added
require NASA and covered contractors, including subcontractors, at all tiers—
(i)
added
to obtain electronic parts that are in production or currently available in stock from—
(I)
added
the original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers; or
(II)
added
suppliers who obtain such parts exclusively from the original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers; and
(ii)
added
to obtain electronic parts that are not in production or currently available in stock from suppliers that meet qualification requirements established under subparagraph (C);
(B)
added
establish documented requirements consistent with published industry standards or Government contract requirements for—
(i)
added
notification of the agency; and
(ii)
added
inspection, testing, and authentication of electronic parts that NASA or a covered contractor, including a subcontractor, obtains from any source other than a source described in subparagraph (A);
(C)
added
establish qualification requirements, consistent with the requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code, pursuant to which NASA may identify suppliers that have appropriate policies and procedures in place to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts; and
(D)
added
authorize a covered contractor, including a subcontractor, to identify and use additional suppliers beyond those identified under subparagraph (C) if—
(i)
added
the standards and processes for identifying such suppliers comply with established industry standards;
(ii)
added
the covered contractor assumes responsibility for the authenticity of parts provided by such suppliers under paragraph (2); and
(iii)
added
the selection of such suppliers is subject to review and audit by NASA.
(d)
added
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added
Covered contractor— The term covered contractor means a contractor that supplies an electronic part, or a product that contains an electronic part, to NASA.
(2)
added
Electronic part— The term electronic part means a discrete electronic component, including a microcircuit, transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode, that is intended for use in a safety or mission critical application.
Sec. 824
Education and outreach
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
United States competitiveness in the 21st century requires engaging the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (referred to in this section as “STEM”) talent in all States;
(2)
added
the Administration is uniquely positioned to educate and inspire students and the broader public on STEM subjects and careers;
(3)
added
the Administration's Education and Communication Offices, Mission Directorates, and Centers have been effective in delivering educational content because of the strong engagement of Administration scientists and engineers in the Administration's education and outreach activities;
(4)
added
the Administration’s education and outreach programs, including the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) and the Space Grant College and Fellowship Program, reflect the Administration’s successful commitment to growing and diversifying the national science and engineering workforce; and
(5)
added
in order to grow and diversify the Nation’s engineering workforce, it is vital for the Administration to bolster programs, such as High Schools United with NASA to Create Hardware (HUNCH) program, that conduct outreach activities to underserved rural communities, vocational schools, and tribal colleges and universities and encourage new participation in the STEM workforce.
(b)
added
Continuation of education and outreach activities and programs—
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall continue engagement with the public and education opportunities for students via all the Administration’s mission directorates to the maximum extent practicable.
(2)
added
Report— Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Administration's near-term outreach plans for advancing space law education.
Sec. 825
Leveraging commercial satellite servicing capabilities across mission directorates
added
(a)
added
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added
Refueling and relocating aging satellites to extend their operational lifetimes is a capacity that NASA will substantially benefit from and is important for lowering the costs of ongoing scientific, national security, and commercial satellite operations.
(2)
added
The technologies involved in satellite servicing, such as dexterous robotic arms, propellant transfer systems, and solar electric propulsion, are all critical capabilities to support a human exploration mission to Mars.
(b)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
satellite servicing is a vital capability that will bolster the capacity and affordability of NASA’s ongoing scientific and human exploration operations while simultaneously enhancing the ability of domestic companies to compete in the global marketplace; and
(2)
added
future NASA satellites and spacecraft across mission directorates should be constructed in a manner that allows for servicing in order to maximize operational longevity and affordability.
(c)
added
Leveraging of capabilities— The Administrator shall identify orbital assets in both the Science Mission Directorate and the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate that could benefit from satellite servicing-related technologies, and shall work across all NASA mission directorates to evaluate opportunities for the private sector to perform such services or advance technical capabilities by leveraging the technologies and techniques developed by NASA programs and other industry programs.
Sec. 826
Flight opportunities
added
(a)
added
Development of payloads—
(1)
added
In general— In order to conduct necessary research, the Administrator shall continue and, as the Administrator considers appropriate, expand the development of technology payloads for—
(A)
added
scientific research; and
(B)
added
investigating new or improved capabilities.
(2)
added
Funds— For the purpose of carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator shall make funds available for—
(A)
added
flight testing;
(B)
added
payload development; and
(C)
added
hardware related to subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(b)
added
Reaffirmation of policy— Congress reaffirms that the Administrator should provide flight opportunities for payloads to microgravity environments and suborbital altitudes as authorized by section 907 of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18405).
Sec. 827
Sense of Congress on small class launch missions
added
added
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
Venture Class Launch Services contracts awarded under the Launch Services Program will expand opportunities for future dedicated launches of CubeSats and other small satellites and small orbital science missions; and
(2)
added
principal investigator-led small orbital science missions, including CubeSat class, Small Explorer (SMEX) class, and Venture class, offer valuable opportunities to advance science at low cost, train the next generation of scientists and engineers, and enable participants to acquire skills in systems engineering and systems integration that are critical to maintaining the Nation’s leadership in space and to enhancing United States innovation and competitiveness abroad.
Sec. 828
Baseline and cost controls
added
added
Section 30104(a)(1) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by striking “Procedural Requirements 7120.5c, dated March 22, 2005” and inserting “Procedural Requirements 7120.5E, dated August 14, 2012”.
Sec. 829
Commercial technology transfer program
added
added
Section 50116(a) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, while protecting national security” after “research community”.
Sec. 830
Avoiding organizational conflicts of interest in major administration acquisition programs
added
(a)
added
Revised regulations required— Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall revise the Administration Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to provide uniform guidance and recommend revised requirements for organizational conflicts of interest by contractors in major acquisition programs in order to address the elements identified in subsection (b).
(b)
added
Elements— The revised regulations under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum—
(1)
added
address organizational conflicts of interest that could potentially arise as a result of—
(A)
added
lead system integrator contracts on major acquisition programs and contracts that follow lead system integrator contracts on such programs, particularly contracts for production;
(B)
added
the ownership of business units performing systems engineering and technical assistance functions, professional services, or management support services in relation to major acquisition programs by contractors who simultaneously own business units competing to perform as either the prime contractor or the supplier of a major subsystem or component for such programs;
(C)
added
the award of major subsystem contracts by a prime contractor for a major acquisition program to business units or other affiliates of the same parent corporate entity, and particularly the award of subcontracts for software integration or the development of a proprietary software system architecture; or
(D)
added
the performance by, or assistance of, contractors in technical evaluations on major acquisition programs;
(2)
added
require the Administration to request advice on systems architecture and systems engineering matters with respect to major acquisition programs from objective sources independent of the prime contractor;
(3)
added
require that a contract for the performance of systems engineering and technical assistance functions for a major acquisition program contains a provision prohibiting the contractor or any affiliate of the contractor from participating as a prime contractor or a major subcontractor in the development of a system under the program; and
(4)
added
establish such limited exceptions to the requirement in paragraphs (2) and (3) as the Administrator considers necessary to ensure that the Administration has continued access to advice on systems architecture and systems engineering matters from highly qualified contractors with domain experience and expertise, while ensuring that such advice comes from sources that are objective and unbiased.
Sec. 831
Protection of Apollo landing sites
added
(a)
added
Assessment— The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, in consultation with relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders, shall assess the issues relating to protecting and preserving historically important Apollo Program lunar landing sites and Apollo program artifacts residing on the lunar surface, including those pertaining to Apollo 11 and Apollo 17.
(b)
added
Contents— In conducting the assessment, the Director shall include—
(1)
added
a determination of what risks to the protection and preservation of those sites and artifacts exist or may exist in the future;
(2)
added
a determination of what measures are required to ensure such protection and preservation;
(3)
added
a determination of the extent to which additional domestic legislation or international treaties or agreements will be required; and
(4)
added
specific recommendations for protecting and preserving those lunar landing sites and artifacts.
(c)
added
Report— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the results of the assessment.
Sec. 832
NASA lease of non-excess property
added
added
Section 20145(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by striking “10 years after December 26, 2007” and inserting “December 31, 2018”.
Sec. 833
Termination liability
added
added
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the ISS, the Space Launch System, and the Orion will enable the Nation to continue operations in low-Earth orbit and to send its astronauts to deep space;
(2)
added
the James Webb Space Telescope will revolutionize our understanding of star and planet formation and how galaxies evolved, and will advance the search for the origins of our universe;
(3)
added
as a result of their unique capabilities and their critical contribution to the future of space exploration, these systems have been designated by Congress and the Administration as priority investments;
(4)
added
contractors are currently holding program funding, estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars, to cover the potential termination liability should the Government choose to terminate a program for convenience;
(5)
added
as a result, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are unavailable for meaningful work on these programs;
(6)
added
according to the Government Accountability Office, the Administration procures most of its goods and services through contracts, and it terminates very few of them;
(7)
added
in fiscal year 2010, the Administration terminated 28 of 16,343 active contracts and orders, a termination rate of about 0.17 percent; and
(8)
added
the Administration should vigorously pursue a policy on termination liability that maximizes the utilization of its appropriated funds to make maximum progress in meeting established technical goals and schedule milestones on these high-priority programs.
Sec. 834
Independent reviews
added
added
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing—
(1)
added
the Administration’s procedures for conducting independent reviews of projects and programs at lifecycle milestones;
(2)
added
how the Administration ensures the independence of the individuals who conduct those reviews prior to their assignment;
(3)
added
the internal and external entities independent of project and program management that conduct reviews of projects and programs at life cycle milestones; and
(4)
added
how the Administration ensures the independence of such entities and their members.
Sec. 835
NASA Advisory Council
added
(a)
added
Assessment— The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Public Administration to assess the effectiveness of the NASA Advisory Council and to make recommendations to Congress for any change to—
(1)
added
the functions of the Council;
(2)
added
the appointment of members to the Council;
(3)
added
the qualifications for members of the Council;
(4)
added
the duration of terms of office for members of the Council;
(5)
added
the frequency of meetings of the Council;
(6)
added
the structure of leadership and Committees of the Council; and
(7)
added
the levels of professional staffing for the Council.
(b)
added
Considerations— In carrying out the assessment under subsection (a), the National Academy of Public Administration shall—
(1)
added
consider the impacts of broadening the Council’s role to include providing consultation and advice to Congress under section 20113(g) of title 51, United States Code;
(2)
added
consider the past activities of the NASA Advisory Council and the activities of other analogous Federal advisory bodies; and
(3)
added
any other issues that the National Academy of Public Administration determines could potentially impact the effectiveness of the Council.
(c)
added
Report— The National Academy of Public Administration shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the results of the assessment, including any recommendations.
(d)
added
Consultation and advice—
(1)
added
In general— Section 20113(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by inserting “and Congress” after “advice to the Administration”.
(2)
added
Sunset— Effective September 30, 2017, section 20113(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by striking “and Congress”.
Sec. 836
Cost estimation
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
realistic cost estimating is critically important to the ultimate success of major space development projects; and
(2)
added
the Administration has devoted significant efforts over the past 5 years to improving its cost estimating capabilities, but it is important that the Administration continue its efforts to develop and implement guidance in establishing realistic cost estimates.
(b)
added
Guidance and criteria— The Administrator shall provide to its acquisition programs and projects, in a manner consistent with the Administration’s Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements—
(1)
added
guidance on when to use an Independent Cost Estimate and Independent Cost Assessment; and
(2)
added
criteria to use to make a determination under paragraph (1).
Sec. 837
Facilities and infrastructure
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
the Administration must address, mitigate, and reverse, where possible, the deterioration of its facilities and infrastructure, as their condition is hampering the effectiveness and efficiency of research performed by both the Administration and industry participants making use of Administration facilities, thus harming the competitiveness of the United States aerospace industry;
(2)
added
the Administration has a role in providing laboratory capabilities to industry participants that are not economically viable as commercial entities and thus are not available elsewhere;
(3)
added
to ensure continued access to reliable and efficient world-class facilities by researchers, the Administration should establish strategic partnerships with other Federal agencies, institutions of higher education, and industry, as appropriate; and
(4)
added
decisions on whether to dispose of, maintain, or modernize existing facilities must be made in the context of meeting Administration and other needs, including those required to meet the activities supporting the Human Exploration Roadmap under section 432 of this Act, consider other national laboratory needs as the Administrator deems appropriate.
(b)
added
Policy— It is the policy of the United States that the Administration maintain reliable and efficient facilities and infrastructure and that decisions on whether to dispose of, maintain, or modernize existing facilities or infrastructure be made in the context of meeting future Administration needs.
(1)
added
In general— The Administrator shall develop a facilities and infrastructure plan.
(2)
added
Goal— The goal of the plan is to position the Administration to have the facilities and infrastructure, including laboratories, tools, and approaches, necessary to meet future Administration and other Federal agencies’ laboratory needs.
(3)
added
Contents— The plan shall identify—
(A)
added
current Administration and other Federal agency laboratory needs;
(B)
added
future Administration research and development and testing needs;
(C)
added
a strategy for identifying facilities and infrastructure that are candidates for disposal, that is consistent with the national strategic direction set forth in—
(i)
added
the National Space Policy;
(ii)
added
the National Aeronautics Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Infrastructure Plan;
(iii)
added
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155; 119 Stat. 2895), National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–422; 122 Stat. 4779), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18301 et seq.); and
(iv)
added
the Human Exploration Roadmap under section 432 of this Act;
(D)
added
a strategy for the maintenance, repair, upgrading, and modernization of Administration facilities and infrastructure, including laboratories and equipment; and
(i)
added
prioritizing deferred maintenance tasks;
(ii)
added
maintaining, repairing, upgrading, or modernizing Administration facilities and infrastructure; and
(iii)
added
implementing processes, plans, and policies for guiding the Administration’s Centers on whether to maintain, repair, upgrade, or modernize a facility or infrastructure and for determining the type of instrument to be used.
Sec. 838
Human space flight accident investigations
added
added
Section 70702 of title 51, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added
by amending subsection (a)(3) to read as follows:
added
“(3) any other orbital or suborbital space vehicle carrying humans that is—
added
“(A) owned by the Federal Government; or
added
“(B) being used pursuant to a contract or Space Act Agreement with the Federal Government for carrying a government astronaut or a researcher funded by the Federal Government; or”
(2)
added
by adding at the end the following:
added
“(c) Definitions—In this section:
added
“(1) Government astronaut—The term government astronaut has the meaning given the term in section 50902.
added
“(2) Space Act Agreement—The term Space Act Agreement means an agreement entered into by the Administration pursuant to its other transactions authority under section 20113(e).”
Sec. 839
Orbital debris
added
(a)
added
Findings— Congress finds that—
(1)
added
orbital debris poses serious risks to the operational space capabilities of the United States;
(2)
added
an international commitment and integrated strategic plan are needed to mitigate the growth of orbital debris wherever possible; and
(3)
added
the delay in the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s submission of a report on the status of international coordination and development of orbital debris mitigation strategies to be inconsistent with such risks.
(1)
added
Coordination— Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the status of efforts to coordinate with foreign countries within the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee to mitigate the effects and growth of orbital debris under section 1202(b)(1) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18441(b)(1)).
(2)
added
Mitigation strategy— Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the status of the orbital debris mitigation strategy required under section 1202(b)(2) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 18441(b)(2)).
Sec. 840
Review of orbital debris removal concepts
added
(a)
added
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added
orbital debris in low-Earth orbit poses significant risks to spacecraft;
(2)
added
such orbital debris may increase due to collisions between existing debris objects; and
(3)
added
understanding options to address and remove orbital debris is important for ensuring safe and effective spacecraft operations in low-Earth orbit.
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator—
(A)
added
in collaboration with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall solicit and review concepts and options for removing orbital debris from low-Earth orbit; and
(B)
added
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the solicitation and review under subparagraph (A), including recommendations on the best options for decreasing the risks associated with orbital debris.
(2)
added
Requirements— The solicitation and review under paragraph (1) shall address the requirements for and feasibility of developing and implementing each of the options.