Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
A 2001 report from the Department of Defense found that “China supplied Pakistan with nuclear material and expertise and has provided critical assistance in the production of Pakistan’s nuclear facilities.” China is also alleged to have provided Pakistan with 50 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, and designs for a nuclear weapon.
(2)
An unclassified 2011 report to Congress from the Director of National Intelligence found that Chinese entities “continue to supply a variety of missile-related items to multiple customers, including Iran and Pakistan.” Previous reports from the Director of National Intelligence have confirmed that Chinese entities have provided support for the missile program of North Korea.
(3)
China has failed to bring to justice Li Fangwei, also known as Karl Lee, who has been indicted in the United States on charges of providing sensitive missile technology to Iran. According to a report from the Congressional Research Service, “concerns persist about Chinese willingness as well as ability to detect and prevent illicit transfers” of dual-use and sensitive nuclear and missile items.
(4)
At a May 12, 2015, hearing, members of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate raised concerns that China may have diverted reactor cooling pumps produced by Curtiss-Wright Corporation to its nuclear submarine program, bolstering the stealth of its submarines, and violating the Previous Nuclear Cooperation Agreement (as that term is defined in section 3(3)).
(5)
China has announced plans to provide Pakistan with additional nuclear reactors, beyond those it had already agreed to construct prior to 2004, in violation of its 2004 commitments to the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).
(6)
Five members of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have been indicted in the United States on charges of hacking into the computer networks of Westinghouse and stealing United States intellectual property, including the design of nuclear power plants.
(7)
China has announced plans to export nuclear power plants based on technology acquired from Westinghouse, one of China's primary commercial partners under its current and previous nuclear cooperation agreements with the United States. While China has committed not to export United States-origin technology without a marketing license from Westinghouse, there is no definition of “United States-origin technology” in the Federal Register, complicating United States enforcement of this provision.
(8)
China General Nuclear Power Company, a state-owned nuclear power provider, has been indicted in the United States on charges of unlawfully producing special nuclear material outside the United States without the authorization of the Department of Energy.
(9)
China’s plans to reprocess United States-origin spent fuel raise the risk that China could divert plutonium to military purposes, enabling it to produce additional nuclear weapons that threaten the United States and its allies.
(10)
Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, in Beijing on March 17, 2016, told the Wall Street Journal that the United States does not “support large-scale reprocessing” and China’s plan to proceed with a commercial-scale reprocessing facility “certainly isn’t a positive in terms of nonproliferation”.
(11)
China’s pursuit of commercial plutonium reprocessing will increase the likelihood that Japan expands its commercial reprocessing program and that South Korea will increase efforts to initiate a similar program of its own. Growing stockpiles of plutonium in East Asia increase the chances of military diversion and theft, raising the risk of nuclear proliferation, nuclear terrorism, and interstate nuclear conflict. It is in the interest of the United States to prevent the stockpiling of plutonium in East Asia.