US Codex
Bill
Notes

S. 2848 — what changed

Water Resources Development Act of 2016

From Introduced in Senate to Reported in Senate. 32 sections amended and 2 added between Introduced in Senate and Reported in Senate.

Sec. 1002 Advanced funds for water resources development studies and projects

The Act of October 15, 1940 (33 U.S.C. 701h–1), is amended—

(1)
in the first sentence—
(A)
by striking “Whenever any” and inserting the following:

“(a) In general—Whenever any”

(B)
by striking “a flood-control project duly adopted and authorized by law” and inserting “an authorized water resources development study or project,”; and
(C)
by striking “such work” and inserting “such study or project”;
(2)
in the second sentence—
(A)
by striking “The Secretary of the Army” and inserting the following:

“(b) Repayment—The Secretary of the Army”

(B)
changed by striking “for “from appropriations which may be provided by Congress for flood-control work”; work” and inserting “if specific appropriations are provided by Congress for such purpose”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:

“(c) Definition of State—In this section, the term State means—

“(1) a State;

“(2) the District of Columbia;

“(3) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

“(4) any other territory or possession of the United States; and

“(5) a federally recognized Indian tribe or a Native village, Regional Corporation, or Village Corporation (as those terms are defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602)).”

Sec. 1006 Munitions disposal

changed Section 1027(b) 1027 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 426e–2(b)) 426e–2) is amended by striking “funded” and inserting “reimbursed”.amended—

(1)
added in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “, at full Federal expense,” after “The Secretary may”; and
(2)
added in subsection (b), by striking “funded” and inserting “reimbursed”.

Sec. 1012 Leveraging Federal infrastructure for increased water supply

(a)
In general— At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall review proposals to increase the quantity of available supplies of water through—
(1)
modification of a water resources project;
(2)
modification of how a project is managed; or
(3)
accessing water released from a project.
(b)
Proposals included— A proposal under subsection (a) may include—
(1)
increasing the storage capacity of a reservoir owned by the Corps of Engineers;
(2)
diversion of water released from a reservoir owned by the Corps of Engineers—
(A)
to recharge groundwater;
(B)
to aquifer storage and recovery; or
(C)
to any other storage facility;
(3)
construction of facilities for delivery of water from pumping stations constructed by the Corps of Engineers;
(4)
construction of facilities to access water; and
(5)
a combination of the activities described in paragraphs (1) through (4).
(c)
Authorities— A proposal submitted to the Secretary under subsection (a) may be reviewed or approved, as appropriate, under—
(1)
sections 203 and 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231, 2232);
(2)
section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a);
(3)
section 301 of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b); and
(4)
section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (commonly known as the “Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899”) (33 U.S.C. 408).
(d)
Cost share—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), 100 percent of the cost of developing, reviewing, and implementing a proposal under subsection (a) shall be provided by an entity other than the Federal Government.
(2)
Cost allocation— A non-Federal entity shall only be required to pay to the Secretary the separable costs associated with operation and maintenance of a dam that are necessary to implement a proposal under subsection (a).
(e)
Contributed funds— The Secretary may receive from a non-Federal interest funds contributed by the non-Federal interest for the review and approval of a proposal submitted under subsection (a).
(f)
Studies and engineering—
(1)
In general— On request by an appropriate non-Federal interest and subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may—
(A)
undertake all necessary studies and engineering for construction of a proposal approved by the Secretary under this section; and
(B)
provide technical assistance in obtaining all necessary permits for the construction.
(2)
Requirement— Paragraph (1) shall only apply if the non-Federal interest contracts with the Secretary to provide funds for the studies, engineering, or technical assistance for the period during which the studies and engineering are being conducted.
(g)
Exclusion— This section shall not apply to reservoirs owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers in—
(1)
the Upper Missouri River;
(2)
changed the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river system; and
(3)
the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa river system.

Sec. 1016 Credit for donated goods

changed Section 221(a)(4)(D)(iv) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(a)(4)(D)(iv)) 1962d-5b(a)(4)(D)(iv)) is amended—

(1)
by inserting “regardless of the cost incurred by the non-Federal interest,” before “shall not”; and
(2)
by striking “costs” and inserting “value”.

Sec. 1017 Structural health monitoring

(a)
changed In general— The Secretary shall design and develop a structural health monitoring program to assess and improve the condition of infrastructure constructed and maintained by the Corps of Engineers, including design and development research, design, and development of systems and frameworks for—
(1)
response to flood and earthquake events;
(2)
pre-disaster mitigation measures; and
(3)
changed lengthening the useful life of the infrastructure.infrastructure.; and
(4)
added identifying risks due to sea level rise.
(b)
Consultation and consideration— In developing the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1)
consult with academic and other experts; and
(2)
consider models for maintenance and repair information, the development of degradation models for real-time measurements and environmental inputs, and research on qualitative inspection data as surrogate sensors.

Sec. 1025 Debris removal

Section 3 of the Act entitled “An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes”, approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is amended—

(1)
by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$5,000,000”; and
(2)
changed by inserting striking “accumulated snags and other debris” and inserting “accumulated snags, obstructions, and other debris located in or adjacent to a Federal channel”.channel”.; and
(3)
added by striking “or flood control” and inserting “, flood control, or recreation”.

Sec. 1026 Aquaculture study

(a)
changed In general— The Comptroller General shall carry out an assessment of the oyster shellfish aquaculture industry, including—
(1)
an examination of Federal and State laws (including regulations) in each relevant district of the Corps of Engineers;
(2)
changed the number, structure, funding, and regulation number of oyster hatcheries shellfish aquaculture leases, verifications, or permits in place in each State;relevant district of the Corps of Engineers;
(3)
changed the number period of oyster time required to secure a shellfish aquaculture leases in place in lease, verification, or permit from each relevant district of the Corps of Engineers;jurisdiction; and
(4)
changed the period experience of time required to secure an oyster the private sector in applying for shellfish aquaculture lease permits from each relevant jurisdiction; anddifferent jurisdictions of the Corps of Engineers and different States.
(5)
removed the experience of the private sector in applying for oyster aquaculture permits from different jurisdictions of the Corps of Engineers and different States.
(b)
Study area— The study area shall comprise, to the maximum extent practicable, the following applicable locations:
(1)
The Chesapeake Bay.
(2)
The Gulf Coast States.
(3)
The State of California.
(4)
changed Puget Sound.The State of Washington.
(c)
changed Findings— Not later than 225 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Environment and Public Works and on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report containing the findings of the assessment conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 1028 Planning assistance to States

changed Section 22(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–16(a)(1)) 1962d-16(a)(1)) is amended—

(1)
by inserting “, a group of States, or a regional or national consortia of States” after “working with a State”; and
(2)
by striking “located within the boundaries of such State”.

Sec. 1032 Review of reservoir operations

(a)
In general— The Secretary, in consultation with the heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall review the operation of a reservoir, including the water control manual and rule curves, using the best available science, including improved weather forecasts and run-off forecasting methods in any case in which the Secretary receives a request for such a review from a non-Federal entity.
(b)
Priority— In conducting reviews under subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to reservoirs—
(1)
located in areas with prolonged drought conditions; and
(2)
for which no such review has occurred during the 10-year period preceding the date of the request.
(c)
Description of benefits— In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine if a change in operations, including the use of improved weather forecasts and run-off forecasting methods, will enhance 1 or more existing authorized project purposes, including—
(1)
flood risk reduction;
(2)
water supply;
(3)
recreation; and
(4)
fish and wildlife protection and mitigation.
(d)
added Consultation— In carrying out a review under subsection (a) and prior to implementing a change in operations under subsection (f), the Secretary shall consult with all affected interests, including—
(1)
added non-Federal entities responsible for operations and maintenance costs of a Federal facility;
(2)
added individuals and entities with storage entitlements; and
(3)
added local agencies with flood control responsibilities downstream of a facility.
(e)
added Results reported— Not later than 90 days
(d)
renumbered was (5) Results reported— Not later than 90 days after completion of a review under this section, the Secretary shall post a report on the Internet regarding the results of the review.
(e)
added
(f)
added Manual update— As soon as practicable, but not later than 3 years after the date on which a report under subsection (d) (e) is posted on the Internet, pursuant to the procedures required under existing authorities, if the Secretary determines based on that report that using the best available science, including improved weather and run-off forecasting methods, improves 1 or more existing authorized purposes at a reservoir, the Secretary shall—
(e)
removed Manual update— As soon as practicable, but not later than 3 years after the date on which a report under subsection (d) is posted on the Internet, pursuant to the procedures required under existing authorities, if the Secretary determines based on that report that using the best available science, including improved weather and run-off forecasting methods, improves 1 or more existing authorized purposes at a reservoir, the Secretary shall—
(1)
renumbered was (6)(3) incorporate those methods in the operation of the reservoir; and
(2)
renumbered was (6)(4) as appropriate, update or revise operational documents, including water control plans, water control manuals, water control diagrams, release schedules, rule curves, and operational agreements with non-Federal entities.
(f)
added
(g)
added Funding— The Secretary may accept and expend amounts from non-Federal entities and other Federal agencies to fund all or a portion of the cost of carrying out a review under subsection (a) or an update or revision of operational documents under subsection (e) (f), including any associated environmental documentation.
(g)
added
(h)
added Effect—
(1)
added Manual updates— An update under subsection (e)(2) (f)(2) shall not interfere with the authorized purposes of a project.
(f)
removed Funding— The Secretary may accept and expend amounts from non-Federal entities and other Federal agencies to fund all or a portion of the cost of carrying out a review under subsection (a) or an update or revision of operational documents under subsection (e), including any associated environmental documentation.
(g)
removed Effect—
(1)
removed Manual updates— An update under subsection (e)(2) shall not interfere with the authorized purposes of a project.
(2)
renumbered was (8)(3) Effect of section— Nothing in this section—
(A)
renumbered was (8)(3)(3) authorizes the Secretary to carry out any project or activity for a purpose not otherwise authorized as of the date of enactment of this Act; or
(B)
renumbered was (8)(3)(4) affects or modifies any obligation of the Secretary under Federal or State law.
(h)
added
(i)
renumbered was (9) Exclusion— This section shall not apply to reservoirs owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers in—
(1)
renumbered was (9)(3) the Upper Missouri River;
(2)
added the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river system; and
(2)
removed the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee river system; and
(3)
renumbered was (9)(5) the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa river system.

Sec. 1035 Hurricane and storm damage reduction

changed Section 3(c)(2)(B) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g(c)(2)(B)), 426g(c)(2)(B)) is amended by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$10,000,000”.

Sec. 1038 Shore damage prevention or mitigation

added

added Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (b), by striking “measures” and all that follows through “project” and inserting “measures, including a study, shall be cost-shared in the same proportion as the cost-sharing provisions applicable to construction of the project”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “(e) Reimbursement for feasibility studies—Beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, in any case in which the Secretary implements a project under this section, the Secretary shall reimburse or credit the non-Federal interest for any amounts contributed for the study evaluating the damage in excess of the non-Federal share of the costs, as determined under subsection (b).”

Sec. 2011 Harbor deepening

Section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(1)) is amended—

(a)
added In general— Section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(1)) is amended—
(1)
renumbered was (3) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “the date of enactment of this Act” and inserting “the date of enactment of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121; 128 Stat. 1193)”;
(2)
renumbered was (4) in subparagraph (B), by striking “45 feet” and inserting “50 feet”; and
(3)
renumbered was (5) in subparagraph (C), by striking “45 feet” and inserting “50 feet”.
(b)
added Definition of deep-draft harbor— Section 214(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2241(1)) is amended by striking “45 feet” and inserting “50 feet”.

Sec. 2015 Non-Federal interest dredging authority

(a)
In general— The Secretary may permit a non-Federal interest to carry out, for an authorized navigation project (or a separable element of an authorized navigation project), such maintenance activities as are necessary to ensure that the project is maintained to not less than the minimum project dimensions.
(b)
Cost limitations— Except as provided in this section and subject to the availability of appropriations, the costs incurred by a non-Federal interest in performing the maintenance activities described in subsection (a) shall be eligible for reimbursement, not to exceed an amount that is equal to the estimated Federal cost for the performance of the maintenance activities.
(c)
Agreement— Before initiating maintenance activities under this section, the non-Federal interest shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary that specifies, for the performance of the maintenance activities, the terms and conditions that are acceptable to the non-Federal interest and the Secretary.
(d)
Provision of equipment— In carrying out maintenance activities under this section, a non-Federal interest shall—
(1)
provide equipment at no cost to the Federal Government; and
(2)
hold and save the United States free from any and all damage that arises from the use of the equipment of the non-Federal interest, except for damage due to the fault or negligence of a contractor of the Federal Government.
(e)
Reimbursement eligibility limitations— Costs that are directly related to the operation and maintenance of a dredge, based on the period of time the dredge is used in the performance of work for the Federal Government during a given fiscal year, are eligible for reimbursement under this section.
(e)
changed Monitoring audit—Reimbursement eligibility limitations— Not earlier than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may conduct an audit on any maintenance activities Costs that are eligible for an authorized navigation project (or a separable element of an authorized navigation project) carried out reimbursement under this section to determine if permitting a non-Federal interest are those costs directly related to carry out the costs associated with operation and maintenance activities under this section has resulted in—of the dredge based on the lesser of the period of time for which—
(1)
added the dredge is being used in the performance of work for the Federal Government during a given fiscal year; and
(2)
added the actual fiscal year Federal appropriations identified for that portion of maintenance dredging that are made available.
(f)
added Monitoring Audit— Not earlier than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may conduct an audit on any maintenance activities for an authorized navigation project (or a separable element of an authorized navigation project) carried out under this section to determine if permitting a non-Federal interest to carry out maintenance activities under this section has resulted in—
(1)
renumbered was (7)(3) improved reliability and safety for navigation; and
(2)
renumbered was (7)(4) cost savings to the Federal Government.
(g)
renumbered was (8) Termination of authority— The authority of the Secretary under this section terminates on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

Sec. 2016 Transportation cost savings

changed Section 210(e)(3)(A) 210(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238(e)(3)(A)) 2238(e)(3)) is amended—

(1)
changed in clause (iii), by striking “and” at the end;redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and
(2)
changed in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; andafter subparagraph (A) the following:

added “(B) Additional requirement—For the first report following the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, in the report submitted under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall identify, to the maximum extent practicable, transportation cost savings realized by achieving and maintaining the constructed width and depth for the harbors and inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2), on a project-by-project basis.”

(3)
removed by adding at the end the following:

removed “(v) identifies, to the maximum extent practicable, transportation cost savings realized by achieving and maintaining the constructed width and depth for the harbors and inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2), on a project-by-project basis.”

Sec. 4001 Gulf Coast oyster bed recovery plan

(a)
Definition of Gulf States— In this section, the term Gulf States means each of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
(b)
Gulf coast oyster bed recovery plan— The Secretary, in coordination with the Gulf States, shall develop and implement a plan to assist in the recovery of oyster beds on the coast of Gulf States that were damaged by events including—
(1)
Hurricane Katrina in 2005;
(2)
the Deep Water Horizon oil spill in 2010; and
(3)
floods in 2011 and 2016.
(c)
Inclusion— The plan developed under subsection (b) shall address the beneficial use of dredged material in providing substrate for oyster bed development.
(d)
changed Submission— Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on of Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives the plan developed under subsection (b).
(e)
Authorization of appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $2,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Sec. 4002 Columbia River

(a)
Ecosystem restoration— Section 536(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–541; 114 Stat. 2662; 128 Stat. 1314) is amended by striking “$50,000,000” and inserting “$75,000,000”.
(b)
Watercraft inspection stations, Columbia River Basin— Section 104(d) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610(d)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “stations in the Columbia River Basin to be located in the States of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington” and inserting “stations to protect the Columbia River Basin”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:

“(A) the Governor of each State in which a station is established under paragraph (1);”

(c)
Tribal housing—
(1)
Definition of report— In this subsection, the term report means the final report of the Portland District, Corps of Engineers, entitled “Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, Oregon and Washington: Fact-finding Review on Tribal Housing” and dated November 19, 2013.
(2)
changed Assistance authorized— As replacement housing for Indian families displaced due to the construction of the Bonneville Dam, on the request of the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary may provide assistance to relocate to on land transferred by the Department of the Army to the Department of the Interior pursuant to title IV of Public Law 100–581 (102 Stat. 2944; 110 Stat. 766; 110 Stat. 3762; 114 Stat. 2679; 118 Stat. 544) for the number of families identified estimated in the report as having received no relocation assistance in the report.
(3)
Study— The Secretary shall—
(A)
conduct a study to determine the number of Indian people displaced by the construction of the John Day Dam; and
(B)
identify a plan for suitable housing to replace housing lost to the construction of the John Day Dam.
(d)
Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Washington and Oregon— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (Public Law 87–874; 76 Stat. 1177) to address safety risks.

Sec. 4008 Rio Grande

changed Section 5056(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114; 121 Stat. 1214) 1214; 128 Stat. 1315) is amended by striking “2019” and inserting “2024”.

Sec. 4013 Coastal resiliency

Section 4014(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2803a(b)) is amended—

(a)
added In general— Section 4014(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2803a(b)) is amended—
(1)
renumbered was (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and
(2)
renumbered was (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:

“(3) give priority to projects in communities the existence of which is threatened by rising sea level, including projects relating to shoreline restoration, tidal marsh restoration, dunal habitats to protect coastal infrastructure, reduction of future and existing emergency repair costs, and projects that use dredged materials;”

(b)
added Interagency coordination on coastal resilience— The Secretary shall convene an interagency working group on resilience to extreme weather, which will coordinate research, data, and Federal investments related to sea level rise, resiliency, and vulnerability to extreme weather, including coastal resilience.

Sec. 4014 Regional intergovernmental collaboration on coastal resilience

added
(a)
added Regional assessments—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary may conduct regional assessments of coastal and back bay protection and of Federal and State policies and programs related to coastal water resources, including—
(A)
added an assessment of the probability and the extent of coastal flooding and erosion, including back bay and estuarine flooding;
(B)
added recommendations for policies and other measures related to regional Federal, State, local, and private participation in shoreline and back-bay protection projects;
(C)
added an evaluation of the performance of existing Federal coastal storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and navigation projects, including recommendations for the improvement of those projects;
(D)
added an assessment of the value and impacts of implementation of regional, systems-based, watershed-based, and interstate approaches if practicable;
(E)
added recommendations for the demonstration of methodologies for resilience through the use of natural and nature-based infrastructure approaches, as appropriate; and
(F)
added recommendations regarding alternative sources of funding for new and existing projects.
(2)
added Cooperation— In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall cooperate with—
(A)
added heads of appropriate Federal agencies;
(B)
added States that have approved coastal management programs and appropriate agencies of those States;
(C)
added local governments; and
(D)
added the private sector.
(b)
added Streamlining— In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall—
(1)
added to the maximum extent practicable, use existing research done by Federal, State, regional, local, and private entities to eliminate redundancies and related costs;
(2)
added receive from any of the entities described in subsection (a)(2)—
(A)
added contributed funds; or
(B)
added research that may be eligible for credit as work-in-kind under applicable Federal law; and
(3)
added enable each District or combination of Districts of the Corps of Engineers that jointly participate in carrying out an assessment under this section to consider regionally appropriate engineering, biological, ecological, social, economic, and other factors in carrying out the assessment.
(c)
added Reports— The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives all reports and recommendations prepared under this section, together with any necessary supporting documentation.

Sec. 5001 Deauthorizations

(a)
Valdez, Alaska—
(1)
In general— Subject to paragraph (2), the portions of the project for navigation, Valdez, Alaska, identified as Tract G, Harbor Subdivision, shall not be subject to navigation servitude beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Entry by Federal Government— The Federal Government may enter on the property referred to in paragraph (1) to carry out any required operation and maintenance of the general navigation features of the project described in paragraph (1).
(b)
changed Red river below Denison dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas— The portion of the project for flood protection on Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647, chapter 596), consisting of the portion of the West Agurs Levee that begins at lat. 32°32′50.86″ N., 32°32’50.86” N ., by long. 93°46′16.82″ 93°46’16.82” W., and ends at lat. 32°31′22.79″ 32° 31’22.79” N., by long. 93°45′2.47″ 93° 45’ 2.47” W., is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(c)
Sutter Basin, California—
(1)
In general— The separable element constituting the locally preferred plan increment reflected in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 12, 2014, and authorized for construction under section 7002(2)(8) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121; 128 Stat. 1366) is no longer authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Savings provisions— The deauthorization under paragraph (1) does not affect—
(A)
the national economic development plan separable element reflected in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 12, 2014, and authorized for construction under section 7002(2)(8) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121; 128 Stat. 1366); or
(B)
previous authorizations providing for the Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project, including—
(i)
section 2 of the Act of March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949; chapter 144);
(ii)
section 12 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900; chapter 665);
(iii)
section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 177; chapter 188); and
(iv)
any other Acts relating to the authorization for the Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project along the Feather River right bank between levee stationing 1483+33 and levee stationing 2368+00.
(d)
changed Stonington Harbor, Connecticut— The portion of the project for navigation, Stonington Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act of May 23, 1828 (4 Stat. 288; chapter 73), 73) that consists of the inner stone breakwater that begins at coordinates N. 682,146.42, E. 1231,378.69, running north 83.587 degrees west 166.79′ 166.79' to a point N. 682,165.05, E. 1,231,212.94, running north 69.209 degrees west 380.89′ 380.89' to a point N. 682,300.25, E. 1,230,856.86, is no longer authorized as a Federal project beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(e)
Green River Lock and Dam 3, Ohio and Muhlenberg Counties, Kentucky—
(1)
changed In general— The structure and land associated with Green River Lock and Dam 3 and deauthorized under section 6001(1) pursuant to the report of the Chief of Engineers relating to Green River Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River Lock and Dam 1, Kentucky, dated April 30, 2015, 2015 shall be transferred under this subsection, and the land shall no longer be a portion of the Green River project for navigation, built by the Commonwealth of Kentucky prior to 1886 and purchased and ceded to the Federal Government under the first section of the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 416; chapter 860).
(2)
Transfer— Subject to this subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the Rochester Dam Regional Water Commission by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 3 adjacent parcels of land situated on the Ohio County side of the Green River together with any improvements on the land.
(3)
Lands to be conveyed—
(A)
In general— The 3 adjacent parcels of land to be conveyed under this subsection total approximately 6.72 acres of land in Ohio County, with all 3 parcels being associated with the deauthorized Green River Lock and Dam 3.
(B)
Use— The 3 parcels of land described in subparagraph (A) may be used by the Rochester Dam Regional Water Commission in such a manner as to ensure a water supply for local communities.
(4)
Reversion— If the Secretary determines that the land conveyed under this subsection ceases to be owned by the public or is used for any purpose that is inconsistent with paragraph (3)(B), all right, title, and interest in and to the land shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
(f)
Green River Lock and Dam 5, Butler and Warren Counties, Kentucky—
(1)
In general— If the Secretary determines that the Corps of Engineers will not oversee and conduct the removal of the lock and dam structure for Green River Lock and Dam 5 deauthorized under section 6001(1) pursuant to the report of the Chief of Engineers relating to Green River Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River Lock and Dam 1, Kentucky, dated April 30, 2015, the lock and dam structure and associated land shall be transferred through established General Services Administration procedures to another entity for the express purposes of—
(A)
removing the structure from the river at the earliest feasible time; and
(B)
making the land available for conservation and public recreation and river access in the future.
(2)
Deauthorization— On a transfer under paragraph (1), the land described in that paragraph shall no longer be a portion of the Green River project for navigation, authorized by the first section of the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 105; chapter 158).
(g)
Green River Lock and Dam 6, Edmonson County, Kentucky—
(1)
In general— The structure and land associated with Green River Lock and Dam 6 and deauthorized under section 6001(1) pursuant to the report of the Chief of Engineers relating to Green River Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River Lock and Dam 1, Kentucky, dated April 30, 2015, shall be transferred under this subsection and the land shall no longer be a portion of the Green River project for navigation, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 359; chapter 1079).
(2)
Transfer—
(A)
changed Transfer to Department of the Interior— Subject to this subsection, the Secretary shall transfer to the Department of the Interior, Mammoth Cave National Park, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in the 4.19 acre parcel of land situated on left descending bank (south side) of the Green River together with any improvements on the land.
(B)
Transfer to the Commonwealth of Kentucky— Subject to this subsection, the Secretary shall transfer to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in the 18.0 acre parcel of land on the right descending bank (north side) of the river and the deauthorized lock and dam structure.
(3)
Land to be conveyed—
(A)
changed In general— The 2 parcels of land to be conveyed under this subsection subsection, located on each side of the Green River and associated with the deauthorized Green River Lock and Dam 6 in Edmonson County, Kentucky, include—
(i)
changed a parcel consisting of approximately 4.19 acres of land, located on each side of the Green River and associated with the deauthorized Green River Lock and Dam 6 in Edmonson County, Kentucky; land; and
(ii)
a parcel consisting of approximately 18.0 acres of land and the deauthorized lock and dam structure.
(B)
Use—
(i)
Mammoth Cave National Park— The 4.19-acre parcel of land described in subparagraph (A)(i) shall be used for established purposes of Mammoth Cave National Park.
(ii)
Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources— The 18.0-acre parcel of land and deauthorized lock and dam structure described in subparagraph (A)(ii) may—
(I)
be used for the purposes of removal of the deauthorized structures to restore natural river functions while providing green space and ecotourism development, including the provision of roads, parking, camping, and boat access; or
(II)
if the Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Commonwealth of Kentucky, cannot fulfill the uses described in subclause (I), be transferred to county or local governments or private conservation entities for continued public green space utilization as described in subclause (I).
(4)
Reversion— If the Secretary determines that the land conveyed under this subsection ceases to be owned by the public or is used for any purpose that is inconsistent with paragraph (3)(B), all right, title, and interest in and to the land shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
(h)
Barren River Lock and Dam 1, Warren County, Kentucky—
(1)
In general— The structure and land associated with Barren River Lock and Dam 1 and deauthorized under section 6001(1) pursuant to the report of the Chief of Engineers relating to Green River Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River Lock and Dam 1, Kentucky, dated April 30, 2015, shall be conveyed under this subsection and the land shall no longer be a portion of the Barren River project for navigation, built by the Commonwealth of Kentucky prior to 1886 and purchased by and ceded to the Federal Government under the first section of the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 416; chapter 860).
(2)
Transfer— Subject to this subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 1 parcel of land situated on the right bank of the Barren River together with any improvements on the land.
(3)
Land to be conveyed—
(A)
In general— The parcel of land to be conveyed under this subsection includes approximately 16.63 acres of land, located on the right bank of the Barren River and associated with the deauthorized Barren River Lock and Dam 1 in Warren County, Kentucky.
(B)
Use— The parcel of land described in subparagraph (A) may—
(i)
be used by the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the purposes of removal of structures to restore natural river functions while providing green space and ecotourism development, including the provision of roads, parking, camping, and boat access; or
(ii)
if the Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Commonwealth of Kentucky, cannot fulfill the uses described in clause (i), be transferred to county or local governments or private conservation entities for continued public green space utilization as described in clause (i).
(4)
Reversion— If the Secretary determines that the land conveyed under this subsection ceases to be owned by the public or is used for any purpose that is inconsistent with paragraph (3)(B), all right, title, and interest in and to the land shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
(i)
Port of Cascade locks, Oregon—
(1)
Termination of portions of existing flowage easement—
(A)
Definition of flowage easement— In this paragraph, the term flowage easement means the flowage easements identified as tracts 302E-1 and 304E-1 on the easement deeds recorded as instruments in Hood River County, Oregon, as follows:
(i)
A flowage easement dated October 3, 1936, recorded December 1, 1936, book 25 at page 531 (records of Hood River County, Oregon), in favor of United States (302E-1-Perpetual Flowage Easement from October 5, 1937, October 5, 1936, and October 3, 1936) (previously acquired as tracts OH-36 and OH-41 and a portion of tract OH-47).
(ii)
A flowage easement recorded October 17, 1936, book 25 at page 476 (records of Hood River County, Oregon), in favor of the United States, that affects that portion below the 94-foot contour line above main sea level (304 E-1-Perpetual Flowage Easement from August 10, 1937 and October 3, 1936) (previously acquired as tract OH-42 and a portion of tract OH-47).
(B)
Termination— With respect to the properties described in paragraph (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the flowage easements are terminated above elevation 82.4 feet (NGVD29), the ordinary high water mark.
(2)
changed Affected properties— The properties described in this paragraph, as recorded in Hood River River, County, Oregon, are as follows:
(A)
Lots 3, 4, 5, and 7 of the “Port of Cascade Locks Business Park” subdivision, instrument #2014-00436.
(B)
Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Hood River County Partition plat No. 2008-25P.
(3)
Federal liabilities; cultural, environmental, other regulatory reviews—
(A)
Federal liability— The United States shall not be liable for any injury caused by the termination of the easement under this subsection.
(B)
Cultural and environmental regulatory actions— Nothing in this subsection establishes any cultural or environmental regulation relating to the properties described in paragraph (2).
(4)
Effect on other rights— Nothing in this subsection affects any remaining right or interest of the Corps of Engineers in the properties described in paragraph (2).
(j)
changed Declarations of non-Navigability non-navigability for portions of the Delaware River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania—
(1)
In general— Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), unless the Secretary determines, after consultation with local and regional public officials (including local and regional project planning organizations), that there are substantive objections, the following portions of the Delaware River, bounded by the former bulkhead and pierhead lines established by the Secretary of War and successors, are declared to be non-navigable waters of the United States:
(A)
Piers 70 South through 38 South, encompassing an area bounded by the southern line of Moore Street extended to the northern line of Catherine Street extended, including the following piers: Piers 70, 68, 67, 64, 61-63, 60, 57, 55, 46, 48, 40, and 38.
(B)
Piers 24 North through 72 North, encompassing an area bounded by the southern line of Callowhill Street extended to the northern line of East Fletcher Street extended, including the following piers: 24, 25, 27-35, 35.5, 36, 37, 38, 39, 49, 51-52, 53-57, 58-65, 66, 67, 69, 70-72, and Rivercenter.
(2)
Determination— The Secretary shall make the determination under paragraph (1) separately for each portion of the Delaware River described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1), using reasonable discretion, by not later than 150 days after the date of submission of appropriate plans for that portion.
(3)
Limits on applicability—
(A)
In general— Paragraph (1) applies only to those parts of the areas described in that paragraph that are or will be bulkheaded and filled or otherwise occupied by permanent structures, including marina and recreation facilities.
(B)
Other Federal laws— Any work described in subparagraph (A) shall be subject to all applicable Federal law (including regulations), including—
(i)
sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (commonly known as the “River and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899”) (33 U.S.C. 401, 403);
(ii)
section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); and
(iii)
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(k)
Salt Creek, Graham, Texas—
(1)
changed In general— The project for flood control, environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek, Graham, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–53; 113 Stat. 278–279), 278-279), is no longer authorized as a Federal project beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Certain project-related claims— The non-Federal sponsor for the project described in paragraph (1) shall hold and save the United States harmless from any claim that has arisen, or that may arise, in connection with the project.
(3)
Transfer— The Secretary is authorized to transfer any land acquired by the Federal Government for the project on behalf of the non-Federal sponsor that remains in Federal ownership on or after the date of enactment of this Act to the non-Federal sponsor.
(4)
Reversion— If the Secretary determines that the land that is integral to the project described in paragraph (1) ceases to be owned by the public, all right, title, and interest in and to the land and improvements shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.

Sec. 5002 Conveyances

(a)
Pearl River, Mississippi and Louisiana—
(1)
changed In general— The project for navigation, Pearl River, Mississippi and Louisiana, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1033, chapter 831), 831) and section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (Public Law 89–789; 80 Stat. 1405), is no longer authorized as a Federal project beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(2)
Transfer—
(A)
In general— Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Secretary is authorized to convey to a State or local interest, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to—
(i)
any land in which the Federal Government has a property interest for the project described in paragraph (1); and
(ii)
improvements to the land described in clause (i).
(B)
Responsibility for costs— The transferee shall be responsible for the payment of all costs and administrative expenses associated with any transfer carried out pursuant to subparagraph (A), including costs associated with any land survey required to determine the exact acreage and legal description of the land and improvements to be transferred.
(C)
Other terms and conditions— A transfer under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(3)
Reversion— If the Secretary determines that the land and improvements conveyed under paragraph (2) ceases to be owned by the public, all right, title, and interest in and to the land and improvements shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United States.
(b)
Sardis lake, Mississippi—
(1)
changed In general— The Secretary is authorized to convey to the lessee, at full fair market value, all right, title and interest of the United States Sates in and to the property identified in the leases numbered DACW38-1-15-7, DACW38-1-15-33, DACW38-1-15-34, and DACW38-1-15-38, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(2)
Easement and restrictive covenant— The conveyance under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)
a restrictive covenant to require the approval of the Secretary for any substantial change in the use of the property; and
(B)
a flowage easement.
(c)
Joe Pool Lake, Texas— The Secretary shall accept from the Trinity River Authority of Texas, if received by September 30, 2016, $31,233,401 as payment in full of amounts owed to the United States, including any accrued interest, for the approximately 61,747.1 acre-feet of water supply storage space in Joe Pool Lake, Texas (previously known as Lakeview Lake), for which payment has not commenced under Article 5.a (relating to project investment costs) of contract number DACW63–76–C–0106 as of the date of enactment of this Act.

Sec. 6001 Authorization of final feasibility studies

The following final feasibility studies for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plan, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this section:

(1)
Navigation—
(2)
Flood risk management—
(2)
changed Hurricane and storm damage Flood risk reduction—management—
(3)
changed Flood risk management Hurricane and environmental restoration—storm damage risk reduction—
(4)
changed Environmental Flood risk management and environmental restoration—
(5)
added Environmental restoration—

Sec. 6003 Authorization of study and modification proposals submitted to Congress by the Secretary

(a)
Arctic deep draft port development partnerships— Section 2105 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2243) is amended—
(1)
by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b))” each place it appears and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 250b)) and a Native village, Regional Corporation, or Village Corporation (as those terms are defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602)”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(e) Consideration of national security interests—In carrying out a study of the feasibility of an Arctic deep draft port, the Secretary—

“(1) shall consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense to identify national security benefits associated with an Arctic deep draft port; and

“(2) if appropriate, as determined by the Secretary, may determine a port described in paragraph (1) is feasible based on the benefits described in that paragraph.”

(b)
Ouachita-Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Ouachita-Black Rivers, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (Public Law 86–645; 74 Stat. 481) to include bank stabilization and water supply as project purposes.
(c)
Cache creek basin, california—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall prepare a general reevaluation report on the project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4112).
(2)
Requirements— In preparing the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall identify specific needed modifications to existing project authorities—
(A)
to increase basin capacity;
(B)
to decrease the long-term maintenance; and
(C)
to provide opportunities for ecosystem benefits for the Sacramento River flood control project.
(d)
Coyote Valley Dam, California— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and water supply by modifying the Coyote Valley Dam, California.
(e)
Del Rosa drainage area, California— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood control and ecosystem restoration in the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, San Bernardino County, California.
(f)
Merced county, california— The Secretary shall prepare a general reevaluation report on the project for flood control, Merced County streams project, California, authorized by section 10 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900; chapter 665), to investigate the flood risk management opportunities and improve levee performance along Black Rascal Creek and Bear Creek.
(g)
Mission-Zanja drainage area, California— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood control and ecosystem restoration in the cities of Redlands, Loma Linda, and San Bernardino, California, and unincorporated counties of San Bernardino County, California.
(h)
Santa Ana River Basin, California— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood damage reduction by modifying the San Jacinto and Bautista Creek Improvement Project, part of the Santa Ana River Basin Project in Riverside County, California.
(i)
Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for shoreline protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware, authorized by section 101(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–53; 113 Stat. 276), to extend the authorized project limit from the current eastward terminus to a distance of 8,000 feet east of the Roosevelt Inlet east jetty.
(j)
Mispillion Inlet, Conch Bar, Delaware— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation and shoreline protection at Mispillion Inlet and Conch Bar, Sussex County, Delaware.
(k)
Daytona Beach flood protection, Florida— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood control in the city of Daytona Beach, Florida.
(l)
Brunswick Harbor, Georgia— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia, authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources and Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–53; 113 Stat. 277)—
(1)
to widen the existing bend in the Federal navigation channel at the intersection of Cedar Hammock and Brunswick Point Cut Ranges; and
(2)
to extend the northwest side of the existing South Brunswick River Turning Basin.
(m)
Savannah River below Augusta, Georgia— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Savannah River below Augusta, Georgia, authorized by the first section of the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 924, chapter 847), to include aquatic ecosystem restoration, water supply, recreation, sediment management, and flood control as project purposes.
(n)
Dubuque, Iowa— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood protection, Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (Public Law 89–298; 79 Stat. 1086), to increase the level of flood protection and reduce flood damages.
(o)
Mississippi River ship channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, Louisiana— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, authorized by section 201(a) of the Harbor Development and Navigation Improvement Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4090), to deepen the channel approaches and the associated area on the left descending bank of the Mississippi River between mile 98.3 and mile 100.6 Above Head of Passes (AHP) to a depth equal to the Channel.
(p)
St. Tammany Parish Government Comprehensive Coastal Master Plan, Louisiana— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects described in the St. Tammany Parish Comprehensive Coastal Master Plan for flood control, shoreline protection, and ecosystem restoration in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana.
(q)
Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, New York— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood protection, Great Lakes Basin, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (Public Law 86–645; 74 Stat. 488) to include sediment management as a project purpose on the Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, New York.
(r)
Chautauqua County, New York—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood risk management, navigation, environmental dredging, and ecosystem restoration on the Cattaraugus, Silver Creek, and Chautauqua Lake tributaries in Chautauqua County, New York.
(2)
Evaluation of potential solutions— In conducting the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all sources, including flooding that results from ice jams.
(s)
Cincinnati, Ohio—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall review the ecosystem restoration and flood risk reduction components of the Central Riverfront Park Master Plan, dated December 1999, for the purpose of determining whether or not the study, and the process under which the study was developed, each comply with Federal law (including regulations) applicable to feasibility studies for water resources development projects.
(2)
Recommendation— Not later than 180 days after reviewing the Master Plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to Congress—
(A)
changed the results of the review of the Master Plan, including a determination of whether any project identified in the plan is feasible; andfeasible;
(B)
any recommendations of the Secretary related to any modifications to section 5116 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114; 121 Stat. 1238) necessary to carry out any projects determined to be feasible.
(t)
Tulsa and West Tulsa, Arkansas River, Oklahoma—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the projects for flood risk management, Tulsa and West Tulsa, Oklahoma, authorized by section 3 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 645; chapter 377).
(2)
Requirements—
(A)
In general— In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall address project deficiencies, uncertainties, and significant data gaps, including material, construction, and subsurface, which render the project at risk of overtopping, breaching, or system failure.
(B)
Addressing deficiencies— In addressing deficiencies under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, including the replacement of mechanical and electrical components at pumping stations, if the incorporation does not significantly change the scope, function, or purpose of the project.
(3)
Prioritization to address significant risks— In any case in which a levee or levee system (as defined in section 9002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3301)) is classified as a Class I or II under the levee safety action classification tool developed by the Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall expedite the project for budget consideration.
(u)
Johnstown, Pennsylvania— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood control, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, authorized by the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570, chapter 688; 50 Stat. 880) (commonly known as the “Flood Control Act of 1936”), to include aquatic ecosystem restoration, recreation, sediment management, and increase the level of flood control.
(v)
Chacon Creek, Texas— Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including any resolution of a Committee of Congress), the study conducted by the Secretary described in the resolution adopted by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on May 21, 2003, relating to flood damage reduction, environmental restoration and protection, water conservation and supply, water quality, and related purposes in the Rio Grande Watershed below Falcon Dam, shall include the area above Falcon Dam.
(w)
Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, authorized by section 1001(40) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114; 121 Stat. 1056), to develop and evaluate alternatives that address navigation problems directly affecting the Corpus Christi Ship Channel, La Quinta Channel, and La Quinta Channel Extension, including deepening the La Quinta Channel, 2 turning basins, and the wye at La Quinta Junction.
(x)
Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas—
(1)
Review— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall review the economic analysis of the Center for Economic Development and Research of the University of North Texas entitled “Estimated Economic Benefits of the Modified Central City Project (Trinity River Vision) in Fort Worth, Texas” and dated November 2014.
(2)
Authorization— The project for flood control and other purposes on the Trinity River and tributaries, Texas, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89–298; 79 Stat. 1091), as modified by section 116 the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–447; 118 Stat. 2944), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out projects described in the recommended plan of the economic analysis described in paragraph (1), if the Secretary determines, based on the review referred to in paragraph (1), that—
(A)
the economic analysis and the process by which the economic analysis was developed complies with Federal law (including regulations) applicable to economic analyses for water resources development projects; and
(B)
based on the economic analysis, the recommended plan in the supplement to the final environmental impact statement for the Central City Project, Upper Trinity River entitled “Final Supplemental No. 1” is economically justified.
(3)
Limitation— The Federal share of the cost of the recommended plan described in paragraph (2) shall not exceed $520,000,000, of which not more than $5,500,000 may be expended to carry out recreation features of the project.
(y)
Chincoteague Island, Virginia— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for ecosystem restoration and flood control, Chincoteague Island, Virginia, authorized by section 8 of Public Law 89–195 (16 U.S.C. 459f–7) (commonly known as the “Assateague Island National Seashore Act”) for—
(1)
assessing the current and future function of the barrier island, inlet, and coastal bay system surrounding Chincoteague Island;
(2)
developing an array of options for resource management; and
(3)
evaluating the feasibility and cost associated with sustainable protection and restoration areas.
(z)
Burley Creek Watershed, Washington— The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood control and aquatic ecosystem restoration in the Burley Creek Watershed, Washington.

Sec. 7002 Sense of the Senate on appropriations levels and findings on economic impacts

(a)
Sense of the Senate— It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should provide robust funding for the State drinking water treatment revolving loan funds established under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12) and the State water pollution control revolving funds established under title VI of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.).
(b)
Findings— Congress finds, based on an analysis sponsored by the Water Environment Federation and the WateReuse Association of the nationwide impact of State revolving loan fund spending using the IMPLAN economic model developed by the Federal Government, that, in addition to the public health and environmental benefits, the Federal investment in safe drinking water and clean water provides the following benefits:
(1)
Generation of significant Federal tax revenue, as evidenced by the following:
(A)
Every dollar of a Federal capitalization grant returns $0.21 to the general fund of the Treasury in the form of Federal taxes and, when additional spending from the State revolving loan funds is considered to be the result of leveraging the Federal investment, every dollar of a Federal capitalization grant returns $0.93 in Federal tax revenue.
(B)
changed A combined $34,700,000,000 in capitalization grants for the clean water and State state drinking water State state revolving loan funds described in subsection (a) over a period of 5 years would generate $7,430,000,000 in Federal tax revenue and, when additional spending from the State revolving loan funds is considered to be the result of leveraging the Federal investment, the Federal investment will result in $32,300,000,000 in Federal tax revenue during that 5-year period.
(2)
An increase in employment, as evidenced by the following:
(A)
changed Every $1,000,000 in State revolving loan fund spending generates 161/2 16 ½ jobs.
(B)
$34,700,000,000 in Federal capitalization grants for State revolving loan funds over a period of 5 years would result in 506,000 jobs.
(3)
An increase in economic output:
(A)
Every $1,000,000 in State revolving loan fund spending results in $2,950,000 in output for the economy of the United States.
(B)
$34,700,000,000 in Federal capitalization grants for State revolving loan funds over a period of 5 years will generate $102,700,000,000 in total economic output.

Sec. 7107 Reducing lead in drinking water

(a)
In general— Part E of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j et seq.) (as amended by section 7106) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“1459B. Reducing lead in drinking water

“(a) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Eligible entity—The term eligible entity means—

“(A) a community water system;

“(B) a system located in an area governed by an Indian Tribe;

“(C) a nontransient noncommunity water system;

“(D) a qualified nonprofit organization, as determined by the Administrator; and

“(E) a municipality or State, interstate, or intermunicipal agency.

“(2) Lead reduction project

“(A) In general—The term lead reduction project means a project or activity the primary purpose of which is to reduce the level of lead in water for human consumption by—

“(i) replacement of publicly owned lead service lines;

“(ii) testing, planning, or other relevant activities, as determined by the Administrator, to identify and address conditions (including corrosion control) that contribute to increased lead levels in water for human consumption;

“(iii) assistance to low-income homeowners to replace privately owned service lines, pipes, fittings, or fixtures that contain lead; and

“(iv) education of consumers regarding measures to reduce exposure to lead from drinking water or other sources.

“(B) Limitation—The term lead reduction project does not include a partial lead service line replacement if, at the conclusion of the service line replacement, drinking water is delivered to a household through a publicly or privately owned portion of a lead service line.

“(3) Low-income—The term low-income, with respect to an individual provided assistance under this section, has such meaning as may be given the term by the head of the municipality or State, interstate, or intermunicipal agency with jurisdiction over the area to which assistance is provided.

“(4) Municipality—The term municipality means—

“(A) a city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public entity established by, or pursuant to, applicable State law; and

“(B) an Indian tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)).

“(b) Grant program

“(1) Establishment—The Administrator shall establish a grant program to provide assistance to eligible entities for lead reduction projects in the United States.

“(2) Precondition—As a condition of receipt of assistance under this section, before receiving the assistance the eligible entity shall take steps to identify—

“(A) the source of lead in water for human consumption; and

“(B) the means by which the proposed lead reduction project would reduce lead levels in the applicable water system.

“(3) Priority application—In providing grants under this subsection, the Administrator shall give priority to an eligible entity that—

“(A) demonstrates that the eligible entity is unable to fund the proposed lead reduction project through other sources of funding; and

added “(A) the Administrator determines, based on affordability criteria established by the State under section 1452(d)(3), to be a disadvantaged community; and

“(B) proposes to—

“(i) carry out a lead reduction project at a public water system or nontransient noncommunity water system that has exceeded the lead action level established by the Administrator at any time during the 3-year period preceding the date of submission of the application of the eligible entity;

“(ii) address lead levels in water for human consumption at a school, daycare, or other facility that primarily serves children or another vulnerable human subpopulation; or

“(iii) address such priority criteria as the Administrator may establish, consistent with the goal of reducing lead levels of concern.

“(4) Cost sharing

“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraph (B), the non-Federal share of the total cost of a project funded by a grant under this subsection shall be not less than 20 percent.

“(B) Waiver—The Administrator may reduce or eliminate the non-Federal share under subparagraph (A) for reasons of affordability, as the Administrator determines to be appropriate.

“(5) Low-income assistance

“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraph (B), an eligible entity may use a grant provided under this subsection to provide assistance to low-income homeowners to carry out lead reduction projects.

“(B) Limitation—The amount of a grant provided to a low-income homeowner under this paragraph shall not exceed the cost of replacement of the privately owned portion of the service line.

“(6) Special consideration for lead service line replacement—In carrying out lead service line replacement using a grant under this subsection, an eligible entity shall—

“(A) notify customers of the replacement of any publicly owned portion of the lead service line;

“(B) in the case of a homeowner who is not low-income, offer to replace the privately owned portion of the lead service line at the cost of replacement;

“(C) in the case of a low-income homeowner, offer to replace the privately owned portion of the lead service line and any pipes, fitting, and fixtures that contain lead at a cost that is equal to the difference between—

“(i) the cost of replacement; and

“(ii) the amount of low-income assistance available to the homeowner under paragraph (5);

“(D) notify each customer that a planned replacement of any publicly owned portion of a lead service line that is funded by a grant made under this subsection will not be carried out unless the customer agrees to the simultaneous replacement of the privately owned portion of the lead service line; and

“(E) demonstrate that the eligible entity has considered multiple options for reducing lead in drinking water, including an evaluation of options for corrosion control.

“(c) Authorization of appropriations—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021.”

(b)
Funding— Out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Administrator to provide grants to eligible entities under this section under section 1459B of the Safe Drinking Water Act (as added by subsection (a)), $20,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Sec. 7112 WaterSense program

(a)
Establishment of WaterSense program—
(1)
In general— There is established within the Environmental Protection Agency a voluntary WaterSense program to identify and promote water-efficient products, buildings, landscapes, facilities, processes, and services that, through voluntary labeling of, or other forms of communications regarding, products, buildings, landscapes, facilities, processes, and services while meeting strict performance criteria, sensibly—
(A)
reduce water use;
(B)
reduce the strain on public and community water systems and wastewater and stormwater infrastructure;
(C)
conserve energy used to pump, heat, transport, and treat water; and
(D)
preserve water resources for future generations.
(2)
Inclusions— The Administrator shall, consistent with this section, identify water-efficient products, buildings, landscapes, facilities, processes, and services, including categories such as—
(A)
irrigation technologies and services;
(B)
point-of-use water treatment devices;
(C)
plumbing products;
(D)
reuse and recycling technologies;
(E)
landscaping and gardening products, including moisture control or water enhancing technologies;
(F)
xeriscaping and other landscape conversions that reduce water use;
(G)
whole house humidifiers; and
(H)
water-efficient buildings or facilities.
(b)
Duties— The Administrator, coordinating as appropriate with the Secretary, shall—
(1)
establish—
(A)
a WaterSense label to be used for items meeting the certification criteria established in accordance with this section; and
(B)
the procedure, including the methods and means, and criteria by which an item may be certified to display the WaterSense label;
(2)
enhance public awareness regarding the WaterSense label through outreach, education, and other means;
(3)
preserve the integrity of the WaterSense label by—
(A)
establishing and maintaining feasible performance criteria so that products, buildings, landscapes, facilities, processes, and services labeled with the WaterSense label perform as well or better than less water-efficient counterparts;
(B)
overseeing WaterSense certifications made by third parties;
(C)
as determined appropriate by the Administrator, using testing protocols, from the appropriate, applicable, and relevant consensus standards, for the purpose of determining standards compliance; and
(D)
changed auditing the use of the WaterSense label in the marketplace and preventing cases of misuse;misuse; and
(4)
not more than 6 years after adoption or major revision of any WaterSense specification, review and, if appropriate, revise the specification to achieve additional water savings;
(5)
in revising a WaterSense specification—
(A)
provide reasonable notice to interested parties and the public of any changes, including effective dates, and an explanation of the changes;
(B)
solicit comments from interested parties and the public prior to any changes;
(C)
as appropriate, respond to comments submitted by interested parties and the public; and
(D)
provide an appropriate transition time prior to the applicable effective date of any changes, taking into account the timing necessary for the manufacture, marketing, training, and distribution of the specific water-efficient product, building, landscape, process, or service category being addressed; and
(6)
not later than December 31, 2018, consider for review and revision any WaterSense specification adopted before January 1, 2012.
(c)
Transparency— The Administrator shall, to the maximum extent practicable and not less than annually, regularly estimate and make available to the public the production and relative market shares and savings of water, energy, and capital costs of water, wastewater, and stormwater attributable to the use of WaterSense-labeled products, buildings, landscapes, facilities, processes, and services.
(d)
Distinction of authorities— In setting or maintaining specifications for Energy Star pursuant to section 324A, and WaterSense under this section, the Secretary and Administrator shall coordinate to prevent duplicative or conflicting requirements among the respective programs.
(e)
No warranty— A WaterSense label shall not create an express or implied warranty.

Sec. 7202 Small and medium treatment works

(a)
In general— Title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

changed “222. Technical assistance for small and medium treatment works

“(a) Definitions—In this section:

changed “(1) Qualified nonprofit technical assistance provider—The Medium treatment works—The term qualified nonprofit technical assistance provider medium treatment works means a nonprofit organization that, as determined by the Administrator—publicly owned treatment works serving not fewer than 10,001 and not more than 100,000 individuals.

added “(2) Qualified nonprofit medium treatment works technical assistance provider—The term qualified nonprofit medium treatment works technical assistance provider means a qualified nonprofit technical assistance provider of water and wastewater services to medium-sized communities that provides technical assistance (including circuit rider technical assistance programs, multi-State, regional assistance programs, and training and preliminary engineering evaluations) to owners and operators of medium treatment works, which may include State agencies.

added “(3) Qualified nonprofit small treatment works technical assistance provider—The term qualified nonprofit small treatment works technical assistance provider means a nonprofit organization that, as determined by the Administrator—

“(A) is the most qualified and experienced in providing training and technical assistance to small treatment works; and

“(B) the small treatment works in the State finds to be the most beneficial and effective.

removed “(2) Small treatment works—The term small treatment works means a publicly owned treatment works serving not more than 10,000 individuals.

removed “(b) Technical assistance—The Administrator may use amounts made available to carry out this section to provide grants or cooperative agreements to qualified nonprofit technical assistance providers to provide to owners and operators of small treatment works onsite technical assistance, circuit-rider technical assistance programs, multistate, regional technical assistance programs, and onsite and regional training, to assist the treatment works in achieving compliance with this Act or obtaining financing under this Act for eligible projects.

changed “(c) Authorization of appropriations—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021.”“(4) Small treatment works—The term small treatment works means a publicly owned treatment works serving not more than 10,000 individuals.

added “(b) Technical assistance—The Administrator may use amounts made available to carry out this section to provide grants or cooperative agreements to qualified nonprofit small treatment works technical assistance providers and grants or cooperative agreements to qualified nonprofit medium treatment works technical assistance providers to provide to owners and operators of small and medium treatment works onsite technical assistance, circuit-rider technical assistance programs, multi-State, regional technical assistance programs, and onsite and regional training, to assist the treatment works in achieving compliance with this Act or obtaining financing under this Act for eligible projects.

added “(c) Authorization of appropriations—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section—

added “(1) for grants for small treatment works technical assistance, $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021; and

added “(2) for grants for medium treatment works technical assistance, $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021.”

(b)
Water pollution control revolving loan funds—
(1)
In general— Section 603 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1383) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (d)—
(i)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “and as provided in subsection (e)” after “State law”;
(ii)
by redesignating subsections (e) through (i) as subsections (f) through (j), respectively; and
(iii)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

changed “(e) Additional use of funds—A State may use an additional 2 percent of the funds annually allotted to the State under this section for qualified nonprofit small treatment works technical assistance providers and qualified nonprofit medium treatment works technical assistance providers (as those terms are defined in section 222) to provide technical assistance to public water systems serving not more than 10,000 individuals small treatment works and medium treatment works in the State.”

(2)
Conforming amendment— Section 221(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(d)) is amended by striking “section 603(h)” and inserting “section 603(i)”.

Sec. 7203 Integrated plans

(a)
Integrated plans— Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(s) Integrated plan permits

“(1) Definitions—In this subsection:

changed “(A) Green infrastructure—The term green infrastructure means the range of measures that use plant or soil systems, permeable pavement or other permeable surfaces or substrates, stormwater harvest and reuse, or landscaping to store, infiltrate, or evapo­trans­pirate evapotranspirate stormwater and reduce flows to sewer systems or to surface waters.

“(B) Integrated plan—The term integrated plan has the meaning given in Part III of the Integrated Municipal Stormwater and Wastewater Planning Approach Framework, issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and dated May 2012.

“(C) Municipal discharge

changed “(i) In general—The term municipal discharge means a discharge from a treatment works (as defined in section 212) or a discharge from a municipal storm sewer under subsection (p).subsection(p).

“(ii) Inclusion—The term municipal discharge includes a discharge of wastewater or storm water collected from multiple municipalities if the discharge is covered by the same permit issued under this section.

“(2) Integrated plan

“(A) In general—The Administrator (or a State, in the case of a permit program approved under subsection (b)) shall inform a municipal permittee or multiple municipal permittees of the opportunity to develop an integrated plan.

“(B) Scope of permit incorporating integrated plan—A permit issued under this subsection that incorporates an integrated plan may integrate all requirements under this Act addressed in the integrated plan, including requirements relating to—

“(i) a combined sewer overflow;

“(ii) a capacity, management, operation, and maintenance program for sanitary sewer collection systems;

“(iii) a municipal stormwater discharge;

“(iv) a municipal wastewater discharge; and

“(v) a water quality-based effluent limitation to implement an applicable wasteload allocation in a total maximum daily load.

“(3) Compliance schedules

“(A) In general—A permit for a municipal discharge by a municipality that incorporates an integrated plan may include a schedule of compliance, under which actions taken to meet any applicable water quality-based effluent limitation may be implemented over more than 1 permit term if the compliance schedules are authorized by State water quality standards.

“(B) Inclusion—Actions subject to a compliance schedule under subparagraph (A) may include green infrastructure if implemented as part of a water quality-based effluent limitation.

“(C) Review—A schedule of compliance may be reviewed each time the permit is renewed.

“(4) Existing authorities retained

“(A) Applicable standards—Nothing in this subsection modifies any obligation to comply with applicable technology and water quality-based effluent limitations under this Act.

“(B) Flexibility—Nothing in this subsection reduces or eliminates any flexibility available under this Act, including the authority of a State to revise a water quality standard after a use attainability analysis under section 131.10(g) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this subsection), subject to the approval of the Administrator under section 303(c).

“(5) Clarification of State authority

“(A) In general—Nothing in section 301(b)(1)(C) precludes a State from authorizing in the water quality standards of the State the issuance of a schedule of compliance to meet water quality-based effluent limitations in permits that incorporate provisions of an integrated plan.

“(B) Transition rule—In any case in which a discharge is subject to a judicial order or consent decree as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 resolving an enforcement action under this Act, any schedule of compliance issued pursuant to an authorization in a State water quality standard shall not revise or otherwise affect a schedule of compliance in that order or decree unless the order or decree is modified by agreement of the parties and the court.”

(b)
Municipal ombudsman—
(1)
Establishment— There is established within the Office of the Administrator an Office of the Municipal Ombudsman.
(2)
General duties— The municipal ombudsman shall—
(A)
provide technical assistance to municipalities seeking to comply with the requirements of laws implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency; and
(B)
provide information to the Administrator to help the Administrator ensure that agency policies are implemented by all offices of the Environmental Protection Agency, including regional offices.
(3)
Actions required— The municipal ombudsman shall work with appropriate offices at the headquarters and regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency to ensure that the municipality seeking assistance is provided information—
(A)
about available Federal financial assistance for which the municipality is eligible;
(B)
about flexibility available under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and, if applicable, the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.); and
(C)
regarding the opportunity to develop an integrated plan, as defined in section 402(s)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (as added by subsection (a)).
(4)
Priority— In carrying out paragraph (3), the municipal ombudsman shall give priority to any municipality that demonstrates affordability concerns relating to compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.).
(c)
Municipal enforcement— Section 309 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1319) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(h) Implementation of integrated plans through enforcement tools

“(1) In general—In conjunction with an enforcement action under subsection (a) or (b) relating to municipal discharges, the Administrator shall inform a municipality of the opportunity to develop an integrated plan, as defined in section 402(s).

“(2) Modification—Any municipality under an administrative order under subsection (a) or settlement agreement under subsection (b) that has developed an integrated plan consistent with section 402(s) may request a modification of the administrative order or settlement agreement based on that integrated plan.”

Sec. 7204 Green infrastructure promotion

Title V of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) is amended—

(1)
by redesignating section 519 (33 U.S.C. 1251 note) as section 520; and
(2)
by inserting after section 518 (33 U.S.C. 1377) the following:

“519. Environmental protection agency green infrastructure promotion

“(a) In general—The Administrator shall ensure that the Office of Water, the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, the Office of Research and Development, and the Office of Policy of the Environmental Protection Agency promote the use of green infrastructure in and coordinate the integration of green infrastructure into, permitting programs, planning efforts, research, technical assistance, and funding guidance.

“(b) Duties—The Administrator shall ensure that the Office of Water—

“(1) promotes the use of green infrastructure in the programs of the Environmental Protection Agency; and

“(2) coordinates efforts to increase the use of green infrastructure with—

“(A) other Federal departments and agencies;

“(B) State, tribal, and local governments; and

“(C) the private sector.

“(c) Regional green infrastructure promotion—The Administrator shall direct each regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency, as appropriate based on local factors, and consistent with the requirements of this Act, to promote and integrate the use of green infrastructure within the region that includes—

“(1) outreach and training regarding green infrastructure implementation for State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, and the private sector; and

“(2) the incorporation of green infrastructure into permitting and other regulatory programs, codes, and ordinance development, including the requirements under consent decrees and settlement agreements in enforcement actions.

changed “(d) Green infrastructure information-Sharing—The information-sharing—The Administrator shall promote green infrastructure information-sharing, including through an Internet website, to share information with, and provide technical assistance to, State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, the private sector, and the public regarding green infrastructure approaches for—

“(1) reducing water pollution;

“(2) protecting water resources;

“(3) complying with regulatory requirements; and

“(4) achieving other environmental, public health, and community goals.”

Sec. 7301 Water infrastructure public-private partnership pilot program

changed Section 5014 5014(c) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; Public Law 113–121) is amended—amended by striking “Any activity undertaken under this section is authorized only to the extent” and inserting “Nothing in this section obligates the Secretary to expend funds unless”.

(1)
removed by striking subsection (c);
(2)
removed by redesignating subsections (d) through (n) as subsections (c) through (m), respectively;
(3)
removed in subsection (c)(5) (as so redesignated), by striking “subsection (g)” and inserting “subsection (f)”;
(4)
removed in subsection (d) (as so redesignated), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “subsection (d)(1)” and inserting “subsection (c)(1)”;
(5)
removed in subsection (e) (as so redesignated), by striking “subsection (d)(4)” and inserting “subsection (c)(4)”;
(6)
removed in subsection (f) (as so redesignated), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “subsection (d)(4)” and inserting “subsection (c)(4)”; and
(7)
removed in subsection (i)(1) (as so redesignated), by striking “subsection (d)(4)” and inserting “subsection (c)(4)”.

Sec. 7302 Water infrastructure finance and innovation

(a)
changed Authority To to provide assistance— Section 5023(b)(2) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3902(b)(2)) is amended by striking “carry out” and inserting “provide financial assistance to carry out”.
(b)
Projects eligible for assistance— Section 5026(6) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3905(6)) is amended—
(1)
by striking “desalination project” and inserting “desalination project, including chloride control”; and
(2)
by striking “or a water recycling project” and inserting “a water recycling project, or a project to provide alternative water supplies to reduce aquifer depletion”.
(c)
Terms and conditions— Section 5029(b) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3908(b)) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (7)—
(A)
by striking “The Secretary” and inserting the following:

“(A) In general—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Secretary”

(B)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) Financing fees—On request of a community with a population of not more than 10,000 individuals, the Secretary or the Administrator, as applicable, shall allow the fees under subparagraph (A) to be financed as part of the loan.”

(2)
by adding at the end the following:

changed “(10) Credit—Any eligible project costs incurred and the value of any integral in-kind contributions made before receipt of assistance under this subtitle shall be credited toward the 51 percent of project costs to be provided by sources of funding other than a secured loan under this subtitle (as described in paragraph (2)(A)).”(2)(A).”

(d)
Removal of pilot designation—
(1)
Subtitle C of title V of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) is amended by striking the subtitle designation and heading and inserting the following:

“C Innovative financing projects”

(2)
Section 5023 of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3092) is amended by striking “pilot” each place it appears.
(3)
Section 5034 of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3913) is amended by striking the section designation and heading and inserting the following:

“5034. Reports on program implementation”

(4)
The table of contents for the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–121) is amended—
(A)
by striking the item relating to subtitle C of title V and inserting the following:
(B)
by striking the item relating to section 5034 and inserting the following:
(e)
Sense of the Senate— It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1)
appropriations made available to carry out the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) should be in addition to robust funding for the State water pollution control revolving funds established under title VI of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.) and State drinking water treatment revolving loan funds established under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12); and
(2)
the appropriations made available for the funds referred to in paragraph (1) should not decrease for any fiscal year.

Sec. 7303 Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund

(a)
Creation of trust fund— There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the “Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund”, consisting of such amounts as may be appropriated or credited to such fund as provided in this section.
(b)
Transfers to trust fund— There are hereby appropriated to the Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund amounts equivalent to the fees received in the Treasury before January 1, 2022, under subsection (f).
(c)
Expenditures— Except as provided by subsection (d), amounts in the Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund shall be available, without further appropriation, as follows:
(1)
changed 85 50 percent of the amounts shall be available to the Administrator for making capitalization grants under section 601 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1381).
(2)
changed 15 50 percent of the amounts shall be available to the Administrator for making capitalization grants under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12).
(d)
Investment— Amounts in the Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund shall be invested in accordance with section 9702 of title 31, United States Code, and any interest on, and proceeds from, any such investment shall be available for expenditure in accordance with this Act and the amendments made by this Act.
(e)
Limitation on expenditures— Amounts in the Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund may not be made available for a fiscal year unless the funds appropriated to the Clean Water State Revolving Fund through annual capitalization grants is not less than the average of the annual amounts provided in capitalization grants under section 601 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1381) for the 5-fiscal-year period immediately preceding such fiscal year.
(f)
Voluntary labeling system—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Administrator of the Food and Drug Administration, manufacturers, producers, and importers, shall develop and implement a program under which the Secretary provides a label designed in consultation with manufacturers, producers, and importers suitable for placement on products to inform consumers that the manufacturer, producer, or importer of the product, and other stakeholders, participates in the Water Infrastructure Investment Trust Fund and is contributing to the clean water of the United States.
(2)
Fee—
(A)
In general— The Secretary shall provide a label for a fee of 3 cents per unit.
(B)
Deposit— Amounts received by the Secretary under subparagraph (A) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.
(g)
EPA study on water pricing—
(1)
Study— The Administrator, with participation by the States, shall conduct a study to—
(A)
assess the affordability gap faced by low-income populations located in urban and rural areas in obtaining services from clean water and drinking water systems; and
(B)
analyze options for programs to provide incentives for rate adjustments at the local level to achieve “full cost ” or “true value” pricing for such services, while protecting low-income ratepayers from undue burden.
(2)
changed Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall transmit to the Committee on the Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study.

Sec. 7304 Innovative water technology grant program

(a)
Definition of eligible entity— In this section, the term eligible entity means—
(1)
a public utility, including publicly owned treatment works and clean water systems;
(2)
a unit of local government, including a municipality or a joint powers authority;
(3)
a private entity, including a farmer or manufacturer;
(4)
an institution of higher education;
(5)
a research institution or foundation;
(6)
a State;
(7)
a regional organization; or
(8)
a nonprofit organization.
(b)
Grant program authorized— The Administrator shall carry out a grant program for purposes described in subsection (c) to accelerate the development of innovative water technologies that address pressing water challenges.
(c)
Grants— In carrying out the program under subsection (b), the Administrator shall make to eligible entities grants that—
(1)
finance projects to develop, deploy, test, and improve emerging water technologies;
(2)
fund entities that provide technical assistance to deploy innovative water technologies more broadly, especially—
(A)
to increase adoption of innovative water technologies in—
(i)
municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment systems;
(ii)
areas served by private wells; or
(iii)
water supply systems in arid areas that are experiencing, or have recently experienced, prolonged drought conditions; and
(B)
in a manner that reduces ratepayer or community costs over time, including the cost of future capital investments; or
(3)
support technologies that, as determined by the Administrator—
(A)
improve water quality of a water source;
(B)
improve the safety and security of a drinking water delivery system;
(C)
minimize contamination of drinking water and drinking water sources, including contamination by lead, bacteria, chlorides, and nitrates;
(D)
improve the quality and timeliness and decrease the cost of drinking water quality tests, especially technologies that can be deployed within water systems and at individual faucets to provide accurate real-time tests of water quality, especially with respect to lead, bacteria, and nitrate content;
(E)
increase water supplies in arid areas that are experiencing, or have recently experienced, prolonged drought conditions;
(F)
treat edge-of-field runoff to improve water quality;
(G)
treat agricultural, municipal, and industrial wastewater;
(H)
recycle or reuse water;
(I)
manage urban storm water runoff;
(J)
reduce sewer or stormwater overflows;
(K)
conserve water;
(L)
improve water quality by reducing salinity;
(M)
mitigate air quality impacts associated with declining water resources; or
(N)
address urgent water quality and human health needs.
(d)
Priority funding— In making grants under this section, the Administrator shall give priority to projects that have the potential—
(1)
to provide substantial cost savings across a sector;
(2)
to significantly improve human health or the environment; or
(3)
to provide additional water supplies with minimal environmental impact.
(e)
changed Cost-Sharing—Cost-sharing— The Federal share of the cost of activities carried out using a grant made under this section shall be not more than 65 percent.
(f)
Limitation— The maximum amount of a grant provided to a project under this section shall be $5,000,000.
(g)
Report— Each year, the Administrator shall submit to Congress and make publicly available on the website of the Administrator a report that describes any advancements during the previous year in development of innovative water technologies made as a result of funding provided under this section.
(h)
Authorization of Appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for each fiscal year.
(i)
Funding— Out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Administrator to provide grants to eligible entities under this section $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Sec. 7401 Drinking water infrastructure

(a)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Eligible State— The term eligible State means a State for which the President has declared an emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) relating to the public health threats associated with the presence of lead or other contaminants in a public drinking water supply system.
(2)
Eligible system— The term eligible system means a public drinking water supply system that has been the subject of an emergency declaration referred to in paragraph (1).
(b)
State revolving loan fund assistance—
(1)
In general— An eligible system shall be—
(A)
considered to be a disadvantaged community under section 1452(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(d)); and
(B)
eligible to receive loans with additional subsidization under that Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), including forgiveness of principal under section 1452(d)(1) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(d)(1)).
(2)
Authorization—
(A)
In general— Using funds provided under subsection (e)(1)(A), an eligible State may provide assistance to an eligible system within the eligible State, for the purpose of addressing lead or other contaminants in drinking water, including repair and replacement of public and private drinking water infrastructure.
(B)
Inclusion— Assistance provided under subparagraph (A) may include additional subsidization under the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), as described in paragraph (1)(B).
(C)
Exclusion— Assistance provided under subparagraph (A) shall not include assistance for a project that is financed (directly or indirectly), in whole or in part, with proceeds of any obligation issued after the date of enactment of this Act—
(i)
the interest of which is exempt from the tax imposed under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(ii)
with respect to which credit is allowable under subpart I or J of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code.
(3)
Limitation— Section 1452(d)(2) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(d)(2)) shall not apply to—
(A)
any funds provided under subsection (e)(1)(A); or
(B)
any other loan provided to an eligible system.
(c)
Water infrastructure financing—
(1)
Secured loans—
(A)
In general— Using funds provided under subsection (e)(2)(A), the Administrator may make a secured loan under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) to—
(i)
an eligible State to carry out a project eligible under paragraphs (2) through (9) of section 5026 of that Act (33 U.S.C. 3905) to address lead or other contaminants in drinking water in an eligible system, including repair and replacement of public and private drinking water infrastructure; and
(ii)
any eligible entity under section 5025 of that Act (33 U.S.C. 3904) for a project eligible under paragraphs (2) through (9) of section 5026 of that Act (33 U.S.C. 3905).
(B)
Amount— Notwithstanding section 5029(b)(2) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3908(b)(2)), the amount of a secured loan provided under subparagraph (A)(i) may be equal to not more than 80 percent of the reasonably anticipated costs of the projects.
(2)
Federal involvement— Notwithstanding section 5029(b)(9) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3908(b)(9)), any costs for a project to address lead or other contaminants in drinking water in an eligible system that are not covered by a secured loan under paragraph (1) may be covered using amounts in the State revolving loan fund under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12).
(d)
Nonduplication of work— An activity carried out pursuant to this section shall not duplicate the work or activity of any other Federal or State department or agency.
(e)
Funding—
(1)
Additional Drinking Water State Revolving Fund capitalization grants—
(A)
In general— The Secretary of the Treasury shall make available to the Administrator a total of $100,000,000 to provide additional grants to eligible States pursuant to section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12), to be available during the period of fiscal years 2016 and 2017 for the purposes described in subsection (b)(2).
(B)
Supplemented intended use plans— From funds made available under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall obligate to an eligible State such amounts as are necessary to meet the needs identified in a supplemented intended use plan by not later than 30 days after the date on which the eligible State submits to the Administrator a supplemented intended use plan under section 1452(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(b)) that includes preapplication information regarding projects to be funded using the additional assistance, including, with respect to each such project—
(i)
a description of the project;
(ii)
an explanation of the means by which the project will address a situation causing a declared emergency in the eligible State;
(iii)
the estimated cost of the project; and
(iv)
the projected start date for construction of the project.
(C)
Unobligated amounts— Any amounts made available to the Administrator under subparagraph (A) that are unobligated on the date that is 18 months after the date on which the amounts are made available shall be available to provide additional grants to States to capitalize State loan funds as provided under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12).
(D)
Applicability— Section 1452(b)(1) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(b)(1)) shall not apply to a supplement to an intended use plan under subparagraph (B).
(2)
WIFIA funding—
(A)
In general— As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall make available to the Administrator $70,000,000 to provide credit subsidies, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, for secured loans under subsection (c)(1)(A) with a goal of providing secured loans totaling at least $700,000,000.
(B)
Use— Secured loans provided pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be available to carry out activities described in subsection (c)(1)(A).
(C)
added Exclusion— Of the amounts made available under subparagraph (A), $20,000,000 shall not be used to provide assistance for a project that is financed (directly or indirectly), in whole or in part, with proceeds of any obligation issued after the date of enactment of this Act—
(i)
added the interest of which is exempt from the tax imposed under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(ii)
added with respect to which credit is allowable under subpart I or J of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code.
(3)
Applicability— Unless explicitly waived, all requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) shall apply to funding provided under this subsection.
(f)
Health effects evaluation—
(1)
In general— Pursuant to section 104(i)(1)(E) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9604(i)(1)(E)), and on receipt of a request of an appropriate State or local health official of an eligible State, the Director of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry of the National Center for Environmental Health shall in coordination with other agencies, as appropriate, conduct voluntary surveillance activities to evaluate any adverse health effects on individuals exposed to lead from drinking water in the affected communities.
(2)
Consultations— Pursuant to section 104(i)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9604(i)(4)), and on receipt of a request of an appropriate State or local health official of an eligible State, the Director of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry of the National Center for Environmental Health shall provide consultations regarding health issues described in paragraph (1).