Improving Medical Device Innovation Act
A BILL
To improve medical device innovation.
Sec. 2 Recognition of standards
“(C)
“(i) Any person may submit a request for recognition under subparagraph (A) of all or part of an appropriate standard established by a nationally or internationally recognized standard organization.
“(ii) Not later than 60 calendar days after the Secretary receives such a request, the Secretary shall—
“(I) make a determination to recognize all, part, or none of the standard that is the subject of the request; and
“(II) issue to the person who submitted such request a response in writing that states the Secretary’s rationale for that determination, including the scientific, technical, regulatory, or other basis for such determination.
“(iii) The Secretary shall take such actions as may be necessary to implement all or part of a standard recognized under subclause (I) of clause (ii), in accordance with subparagraph (A).
“(D) The Secretary shall make publicly available, in such manner as the Secretary determines appropriate, the rationale for recognition of all, part, or none of a standard, including the scientific, technical, regulatory, or other basis for the decision regarding such recognition.”
“(4) Training on use of standards—The Secretary shall provide to all employees of the Food and Drug Administration who review premarket submissions for devices periodic training on the concept and use of recognized standards for purposes of meeting a premarket submission requirement or other applicable requirement under this Act, including standards relevant to an employee’s area of device review.”
Sec. 3 Certain class I and class II devices
“(2) Not later than 120 calendar days after the date of enactment of the Improving Medical Device Innovation Act and at least once every 5 years thereafter, as the Secretary determines appropriate, the Secretary shall identify, through publication in the Federal Register, any type of class I device that the Secretary determines no longer requires a report under subsection (k) to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Upon such publication—
“(A) each type of class I device so identified shall be exempt from the requirement for a report under subsection (k); and
“(B) the classification regulation applicable to each such type of device shall be deemed amended to incorporate such exemption.”
“(1) The Secretary shall—
“(A) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Improving Medical Device Innovation Act and at least once every 5 years thereafter, as the Secretary determines appropriate—
“(i) publish in the Federal Register a notice that contains a list of each type of class II device that the Secretary determines no longer requires a report under subsection (k) to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness; and
“(ii) provide for a period of not less than 60 calendar days for public comment beginning on the date of the publication of such notice; and
“(B) not later than 210 calendar days after the date of enactment of the Improving Medical Device Innovation Act, publish in the Federal Register a list representing the Secretary’s final determination with respect to the devices contained in the list published under subparagraph (A).”
“(3) Upon the publication of the final list under paragraph (1)(B)—
“(A) each type of class II device so listed shall be exempt from the requirement for a report under subsection (k); and
“(B) the classification regulation applicable to each such type of device shall be deemed amended to incorporate such exemption.”
Sec. 4 Classification panels
“(B) When a device is specifically the subject of review by a classification panel, the Secretary shall—
“(i) ensure that adequate expertise is represented on the classification panel to assess—
“(I) the disease or condition which the device is intended to cure, treat, mitigate, prevent, or diagnose; and
“(II) the technology of the device; and
“(ii) provide an opportunity for the person whose device is specifically the subject of panel review to provide recommendations on the expertise needed among the voting members of the panel.
“(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B)(i), the term adequate expertise means that the membership of the classification panel includes—
“(i) two or more voting members, with a specialty or other expertise clinically relevant to the device under review; and
“(ii) at least one voting member who is knowledgeable about the technology of the device.
“(D) The Secretary shall provide an annual opportunity for patients, representatives of patients, and sponsors of medical device submissions to provide recommendations for individuals with appropriate expertise to fill voting member positions on classification panels.”
“(B)
“(i) Any meeting of a classification panel with respect to the review of a device shall—
“(I) provide adequate time for initial presentations by the person whose device is specifically the subject of such review and by the Secretary; and
“(II) provide adequate time for and encourage free and open participation by all interested persons.
“(ii) Following the initial presentations described in clause (i), the panel may—
“(I) pose questions to the designated representative described in subparagraph (A)(iii); and
“(II) consider the responses to such questions in the panel’s review of the device.”