H.R. 5283 — what changed
DUE PROCESS Act of 2016
From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 4 sections amended between Introduced in House and Reported in House.
Sec. 2 General rules for civil forfeiture proceedings
Section 983(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
changed “(vi) The notice under this subparagraph shall include an address, which shall also be widely published, at which the seizing agency can receive until 5 p.m. on any business day an interested party’s claim contesting a seizure or forfeiture. The interested party may send such a claim to that address by courier or overnight mail. For the purpose of determining compliance with any deadlines in filing such a claim, an interested party completes the filing by placing the communication making the claim in the control of an independent third party delivery service such as a courier company or the United States mail. In determining whether any legal deadline for the filing of such a claim has been met a court shall allow for the equitable tolling of the deadline in appropriate cases.
“(vii) The seizing agency shall make publicly available for each nonjudicial forfeiture, with respect to which a request for mitigation or remission is made, a statement of the agency’s disposition of that request, redacted if necessary, including the reasons for the decision.”
“(G) Any notice described in subparagraph (A) that is provided to a party shall include notice of—
“(i) the right of the party to request an initial hearing in accordance with paragraph (5);
changed
“(ii) the right of the party to be represented by counsel at the initial hearing described in clause (i) and any civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute;statute; and
“(iii) the right of the party to request that the party be represented by counsel at the initial hearing described in clause (i) and any civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute if the party meets the requirements described in subsection (b).”
“(A) Not later than 90 days after a claim has been filed, the Government shall file a complaint for forfeiture in the manner set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims or return the property pending the filing of a complaint, except that a court in the district in which the complaint has been filed may extend the period for filing a complaint upon agreement of the parties.”
“(5)
“(A) A party claiming property seized in a civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute may request, not later than 30 days after the date on which a notice described in paragraph (1)(A) is received or if notice is not received, not later than 30 days after the date of final publication of notice of seizure, an initial hearing to take place before a magistrate judge in the appropriate United States district court not later than the date on which a civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute relating to the seized property commences.
“(B) If a party makes a request under subparagraph (A), a magistrate judge shall conduct an initial hearing not later than 10 days after the date on which the request is made.
“(C) At the initial hearing—
“(i) the magistrate judge shall—
“(I) inform the party in easily understood terms of—
“(aa) the right of the party to be represented by counsel at the initial hearing and any civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute;
“(bb) the right of the party to request that the party be represented by counsel at the initial hearing and any civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute if the magistrate judge finds that the party meets the requirements described in subsection (b);
“(cc) sufficiently detailed facts regarding the seizure of the property if the property was seized pursuant to a warrant described in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 981(b)(2); and
“(dd) the right of the party to challenge the lawfulness of the seizure of the property, including on the grounds that at the time the property was seized—
“(AA) if the property was seized pursuant to a warrant described in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 981(b)(2), the warrant was not supported by probable cause; or
“(BB) if the property was seized without a warrant described in subitem (AA), none of the exceptions described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 981(b)(2) apply to the seizure of the property; and
“(II) if the party meets the requirements described in subsection (b), authorize counsel to represent the party or insure that the party is represented by an attorney for the Legal Services Corporation, as applicable, in accordance with that subsection; and
“(ii) the burden of proof is on the Government to establish that at the time the property was seized—
“(I) if the property was seized pursuant to a warrant described in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 981(b)(2), the warrant was supported by probable cause; or
“(II) if the property was seized without a warrant described in subclause (I)—
“(aa) sufficiently detailed facts regarding the seizure of the property; and
“(bb) an exception described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 981(b)(2) applies to the seizure of the property.
changed “(D) The magistrate judge shall enter an order for the immediate release of the seized property with prejudice to the right of the Government to commence a civil forfeiture proceeding at a later time if the magistrate judge finds that—
“(i) the requirements described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (f)(1) are met; and
“(ii) the Government did not meet the burden of proof described in subparagraph (C)(ii).”
Sec. 7 Annual audit of civil forfeitures
changed
The Inspector General shall annually conduct an audit of a representative sample of Federal civil forfeitures under statutes described in section 983(i) of title 18, United States Code, to ensure those forfeitures are constitutionally sound and consistent with the letter and spirit of the law. The Department of Justice Inspector General shall report the results of the audit to the Attorney General and to Congress. Such report shall also include the fiscal status of the Asset Forfeiture Fund and Treasury Forfeiture Fund, including any projected growth or shrinking of the Fund Funds in future years, and the viability of the fund.Funds.
Sec. 8 Publicly available databases
Sec. 9 Standard of proof relating to possibly innocent owners
“(3) if the Government’s theory of forfeiture is that the property was used to commit or facilitate the commission of a criminal offense, or was involved in the commission of a criminal offense, the Government shall establish by clear and convincing evidence that—
“(A) there was a substantial connection between the property and the offense; and
“(B) the owner of any interest in the seized property—
“(i) intentionally used the property in connection with the offense;
“(ii) knowingly consented to the use of the property by another in connection with the offense; or
changed
“(iii) should have reasonably known knew that the property was being used in connection with the offense.”
“(1) An innocent owner’s interest in property shall not be forfeited under any civil forfeiture statute. The Government shall have the burden of proving that the claimant is not an innocent owner by clear and convincing evidence.”