H.R. 4979 — what changed
Advanced Nuclear Technology Development Act of 2016
From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 3 sections amended and 1 added between Introduced in House and Reported in House.
Sec. 2 Findings
Congress finds the following:
Nuclear energy generates approximately 20 percent of the total electricity and approximately 60 percent of the carbon-free electricity of the United States.
Nuclear power plants operate consistently at a 90 percent capacity factor, and provide consumers and businesses with reliable and affordable electricity.
Nuclear power plants generate billions of dollars in national economic activity through nationwide procurements and provide thousands of Americans with high paying jobs contributing substantially to the local economies in communities where they operate.
The United States commercial nuclear industry must continue to lead the international civilian nuclear marketplace, because it is one of our most powerful national security tools, guaranteeing the safe, secure, and exclusively peaceful use of nuclear energy.
Maintaining the Nation’s nuclear fleet of commercial light water reactors and expanding the use of new advanced reactor designs would support continued production of reliable baseload electricity and maintain United States global leadership in nuclear power.
added
Nuclear fusion technology also has the potential to generate electricity with significantly increased safety performance and no radioactive waste.
renumbered
was (8)
The development of advanced reactor designs would benefit from a performance-based, risk-informed, efficient, and cost-effective regulatory framework with defined milestones and the opportunity for applicants to demonstrate progress through Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval.
Sec. 3 Definitions
In this Act:
changed
Advanced reactor— The term “advanced reactor” means a nuclear fission reactor with significant design improvements over the most recent generation of nuclear reactors. Such improvements may include inherent safety features, lower waste yields, greater fuel utilization, superior reliability, resistance to proliferation, and increased thermal efficiency.
Department— The term “Department” means the Department of Energy.
Licensing— The term “licensing” means NRC activities related to reviewing applications for licenses, permits, and design certifications, and requests for any other regulatory approval for nuclear reactors within the responsibilities of the NRC under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
National laboratory— The term “National Laboratory” has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801).
NRC— The term “NRC” means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Secretary— The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 6 Advanced reactor regulatory framework
changed
Plan required— Not later than 270 days 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the NRC shall transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a plan for developing an efficient, risk-informed, technology-neutral framework for advanced reactor licensing. The plan shall evaluate the following subjects, consistent with the NRC’s role in protecting public health and safety and common defense and security:
The unique aspects of advanced reactor licensing and any associated legal, regulatory, and policy issues the NRC will need to address to develop a framework for licensing advanced reactors.
Options for licensing advanced reactors under existing NRC regulations in title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, a proposed new regulatory framework, or a combination of these approaches.
changed
Options to expedite and streamline the licensing of advanced reactors, including opportunities to minimize the time from application submittal to final NRC approval licensing decision and minimize the delays that may result from any necessary amendments or supplements to applications.
Options to expand the incorporation of consensus-based codes and standards into the advanced reactor regulatory framework to minimize time to completion and provide flexibility in implementation.
Options to make the advanced reactor licensing framework more predictable. This evaluation should consider opportunities to improve the process by which application review milestones are established and maintained.
Options to allow applicants to use phased review processes under which the NRC issues approvals that do not require the NRC to re-review previously approved information. This evaluation shall consider the NRC’s ability to review and conditionally approve partial applications, early design information, and submittals that contain design criteria and processes to be used to develop information to support a later phase of the design review.
The extent to which NRC action or modification of policy is needed to implement any part of the plan required by this subsection.
The role of licensing advanced reactors within NRC long-term strategic resource planning, staffing, and funding levels.
added
Options to provide cost-sharing financial structures for license applicants in a phased licensing process.
Coordination and stakeholder input required— In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the NRC shall seek input from the Department, the nuclear industry, and other public stakeholders.
changed
Cost and schedule estimate— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include proposed cost estimates, budgets, and specific milestones for implementing the advanced reactor regulatory framework by September 30, 2019.
added
Design certification status— In the NRC’s first budget request after the acceptance of any design certification application for an advanced nuclear reactor, and annually thereafter, the NRC shall provide the status of performance metrics and milestone schedules. The budget request shall include a plan to correct or recover from any milestone schedule delays, including delays because of NRC’s inability to commit resources for its review of the design certification applications.
Sec. 8 Agreements for privately funded reactors
addedadded The Department shall not enter into a new agreement with any private entity to host a privately funded reactor at a Department-owned site that would affect the Federal Government’s liability—
added
with respect to the disposal of spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste, as defined by section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101), until the NRC has published a final decision on an application for construction for a repository under section 114(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 10168(d)); and
added
with respect to operation and decommissioning—
added
unless such private entity has obtained and is maintaining financial protection of such type and in such amounts as the NRC shall require to cover public liability claims pursuant to section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act; and
added
until such private entity has provided reasonable assurance that funds will be available for the decommissioning process pursuant to part 50 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.