Sec. 3
Operational control of the border
(a)
Securing the border— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall gain and maintain situational awareness, and operational control of high traffic areas, by the date that is not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, and operational control and situational awareness along the southern land border of the United States by the date that is not later than five years after such date of enactment.
(b)
changed
Required capability deployment— The Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the appropriate component of the Department of Homeland Security, shall, at a minimum, deploy to each sector or region, as the case may be, of the southern border, in a prioritized, risk-based manner to achieve situational awareness and operational control of the border the following additional capabilities:
(1)
San Diego sector— For the San Diego sector, the following:
(A)
Subterranean surveillance and detection technologies.
(B)
To increase coastal maritime domain awareness, the following:
(i)
Deployable, lighter than air surface surveillance equipment.
(ii)
Unmanned aerial vehicles with maritime surveillance capability.
(iii)
Maritime patrol aircraft.
(iv)
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(v)
Maritime signals intelligence capabilities.
(C)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(D)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(E)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(2)
El Centro sector— For the El Centro sector, the following:
(A)
Tower-based surveillance technology.
(B)
Deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment.
(C)
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(D)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(E)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(3)
Yuma sector— For the Yuma sector, the following:
(A)
Tower-based surveillance technology.
(B)
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(C)
Deployable, lighter-than-air ground surveillance equipment.
(D)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(E)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(4)
Tucson sector— For the Tucson sector, the following:
(A)
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(B)
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(C)
Tower-based surveillance technology.
(D)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(E)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(F)
Deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment.
(G)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(5)
El Paso sector— For the El Paso sector, the following:
(A)
Tower-based surveillance technology.
(B)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(C)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(D)
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(E)
Deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(6)
Big Bend sector— For the Big Bend sector, the following:
(A)
Tower-based surveillance technology.
(B)
Deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment.
(C)
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(E)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(7)
Del Rio sector— For the Del Rio sector, the following:
(A)
Increased monitoring for cross-river dams, culverts, and footpaths.
(B)
changed
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(C)
Improved maritime capabilities in the Amistad Recreation Area.
(D)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(E)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(8)
Laredo sector— For the Laredo sector, the following:
(A)
Maritime detection resources for Falcon Lake region.
(B)
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(C)
Increased monitoring for cross-river dams, culverts, and footpaths.
(D)
changed
Ultralight aircraft detection capability.capabilities.
(E)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(9)
Rio Grande Valley sector— For the Rio Grande Valley sector, the following:
(A)
Deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment.
(B)
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction and monitoring operations capability.
(C)
changed
Ultralight aircraft detection capability.capabilities.
(D)
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(E)
Increased monitoring for cross-river dams, culverts, footpaths.
(F)
added
A rapid reaction capability supported by aviation assets.
(10)
Eastern Pacific Maritime region— For the Eastern Pacific Maritime region, the following:
(A)
Increased cutter and boat hours and operation platforms to conduct interdiction operations.
(B)
Increased maritime signals intelligence capabilities.
(C)
To increase maritime domain awareness, the following:
(i)
Deployable, lighter than air surface surveillance equipment.
(ii)
Unmanned aerial vehicles with maritime surveillance capability.
(iii)
Increased maritime aviation patrol hours.
(iv)
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(D)
changed
Increased operational hours for maritime security components dedicated to joint counter-smuggling and interdiction efforts with other Federal agencies, including the Joint Interagency Task Forces, and the United States Coast Guard Deployable Law Enforcement Teams.Specialized Forces.
(11)
Caribbean and Gulf Maritime region— For the Caribbean and Gulf Maritime region, the following:
(A)
Increased cutter and boat hours and operation platforms to conduct interdiction operations.
(B)
Increased maritime signals intelligence capabilities.
(C)
Increased maritime domain awareness and surveillance capabilities, including the following:
(i)
Deployable, lighter than air surface surveillance equipment.
(ii)
Unmanned aerial vehicles with maritime surveillance capability.
(iii)
Increased maritime aviation patrol hours.
(iv)
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(D)
changed
Increased operational hours for maritime security components dedicated to joint counter-smuggling and interdiction efforts with other Federal agencies, including the Joint Interagency Task Forces, and the United States Coast Guard Tactical Law Enforcement Teams.Deployable Specialized Forces.
(c)
Fencing and infrastructure—
(1)
New fencing— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall construct, at a minimum, each of the following:
(A)
Seven miles of double layer fencing in the Border Patrol’s San Diego sector in addition to such fencing in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(B)
changed
Ten Twenty-one miles of double layer pedestrian fencing in the Border Patrol’s Tucson sector in addition to such fencing in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(C)
Ten miles of double layer pedestrian fencing in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector in addition to such fencing in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(D)
added
Ten miles of double layer pedestrian fencing in the Border Patrol’s Del Rio sector in addition to such fencing in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2)
Fence repair and replacement— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall replace, at a minimum, each of the following:
(A)
Thirty-one miles of landing mat fencing with bollard style fencing in the Border Patrol’s San Diego sector.
(B)
Five miles of landing mat fencing with bollard style fencing in the Border Patrol’s El Centro sector.
(C)
Three miles of landing mat fencing with bollard style fencing in the Border Patrol’s Yuma sector.
(D)
Twenty-five miles of landing mat fencing with bollard style fencing in the Border Patrol’s Tucson sector.
(E)
Two miles of landing mat fencing with bollard style fencing in the Border Patrol’s El Paso sector.
(3)
Road construction— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall complete, at a minimum, each of the following road construction projects to allow greater access for the Border Patrol:
(A)
Seven miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s San Diego sector.
(B)
Ten miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s El Centro sector.
(C)
Sixteen miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Yuma sector.
(D)
Fifty-four miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Tucson sector.
(E)
One hundred ninety-two miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Big Bend sector.
(F)
Two miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s El Paso sector.
(G)
Forty-two miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Del Rio sector.
(H)
Sixty-five miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Laredo sector.
(I)
Fifteen miles of road construction in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector.
(4)
Road maintenance— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall complete, at a minimum, each of the following:
(A)
Thirty-seven miles of road maintenance in the Border Patrol’s San Diego sector.
(B)
One thousand two hundred miles of road maintenance in the Border Patrol’s Del Rio sector.
(C)
Twenty-six miles of road maintenance in the Border Patrol’s Laredo sector.
(D)
Ninety-four miles of road maintenance in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector.
(5)
changed
New vehicle fence— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall complete six miles of vehicle fencing in the Border Patrol’s Big Bend sector in addition to such fencing in existence of as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(6)
Vehicle fence replacement— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall replace five miles of vehicle fencing with new vehicle fencing in the Border Patrol’s Tucson sector in addition to such fencing in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(7)
Boat ramps— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall complete, at a minimum, the construction of each of the following:
(A)
Eight boat ramps in the Border Patrol’s Del Rio sector in addition to such ramps in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(B)
One boat ramp in the Border Patrol’s Laredo sector in addition to such ramps in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(C)
Twenty-one boat ramps in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector in addition to such ramps in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(8)
Access gates— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall construct 34 access gates in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector in addition to such gates in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(9)
Forward operating bases— Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall complete, at a minimum, construction of each of the following:
(A)
One forward operating base in the Border Patrol’s El Paso sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(B)
Two forward operating bases in the Border Patrol’s Tucson sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(C)
Three forward operating bases in the Border Patrol’s Big Bend sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(D)
Two forward operating bases in the Border Patrol’s Del Rio sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(E)
Two forward operating bases in the Border Patrol’s Laredo sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(F)
Two forward operating bases in the Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector in addition to such bases in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(10)
Roads— The roads referred to in paragraphs (3) and (4) shall include border roads, patrol roads, access roads, and Federal, State, local, and privately owned roads.
(11)
Minimum forward operating base requirements— The forward operating bases referred to in paragraph (9) shall be equipped with each of the following:
(B)
Temporary detention space.
(F)
changed
Adequate communications, including local wide area network connectivity.
(G)
Helicopter landing zone.
(d)
Carrizo cane eradication—
(1)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(A)
Carrizo cane is a non-native, invasive plant growing along the Rio Grande River in Texas, with heights of up to 27 feet tall.
(B)
changed
According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “the [Carrizo cane] plant causes serious officer safety issues and operational concerns because it hampers enforcement along the [Rio Grande] river. The plant also provides concealment to criminals, drug smugglers, illegal aliens, and potential terrorists who could use it as an advantage to enter the Unites United States illegally. The obvious officer safety hazards created by this situation are of grave concern to the Border Patrol and need to be remedied”.
(2)
Eradication— The Chief of the Border Patrol shall coordinate with the heads of each relevant Federal and State agency to eradicate, to the greatest extent practicable, the Carrizo cane plant along the Rio Grande River.
(e)
changed
Consultation— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the governors of each southern land border State, including State and each southern border maritime States, State, representatives of the Border Patrol and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and relevant Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies that have jurisdiction on the southern land border, or in the maritime environment, to develop the operational plan required under subsection (f) and the metrics required under subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k).
(1)
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States a comprehensive operational plan for each of the components of the Department of Homeland Security responsible for border or maritime security to gain and maintain situational awareness, operational control of high traffic areas, and operational control along the southern land border of the United States by the dates, respectively, referred to in subsection (a).
(2)
Contents of plan— The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of principal border security threats, including threats relating to the smuggling and trafficking of humans, weapons, and illicit drugs.
(B)
A description of the required capability deployment under subsection (b).
(C)
A plan to analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information among the border security components of the Department of Homeland Security, and between the Department and other appropriate Federal departments and agencies with missions associated with the border.
(D)
A plan to achieve situational awareness using the capabilities deployed under subsection (b).
(E)
A plan to ensure that any new border security assets will be operationally integrated with assets in use by the Department of Homeland Security as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(F)
A plan to eradicate the Carrizo cane plant, as required under subsection (d).
(G)
Lessons learned from Operation Jumpstart and Operation Phalanx.
(H)
changed
A description of border security information received from consultation with border community stakeholders, including representatives from agricultural and ranching organizations and business and civic organizations along the northern or southern border.land borders.
(I)
A description of the staffing requirements for all border security functions of the border security components of the Department of Homeland Security.
(J)
A prioritized list of research and development objectives to enhance the security of the international land and maritime borders of the United States.
(K)
An assessment of the relationship between border security operations and crossing times.
(L)
Metrics required under subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k).
(M)
An integrated master schedule and cost estimate, including lifecycle costs, for the activities contained in such operational plan.
(N)
A documented justification and rationale for technology choices.
(O)
Deployment locations.
(P)
A timetable for procurement and deployment.
(Q)
Estimates of operation and maintenance costs.
(R)
An identification of any impediments to the deployment of such technologies.
(3)
Classified assessment— The assessment required to be included in the report under paragraph (2)(A) may be submitted in classified form, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that such is appropriate.
(A)
In general— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall commence the implementation of the operational plan under paragraph (1) not later than 30 days after the submission to the appropriate congressional committees of the report by the Comptroller General of the United States under subparagraph (C).
(B)
Comptroller General review— Not later than 90 days after receiving the operational plan under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC a report on the operational plan required under paragraph (1) and such congressional justification.
(g)
Periodic updates— Not later than 180 days after the submission of each Quadrennial Homeland Security Review required under section 707 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 347) beginning with the first such Review that is due after the operational plan is submitted under subsection (f), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States an updated operational plan under paragraph (1) of subsection (f).
(h)
Metrics for securing the border between ports of entry—
(1)
changed
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and an annually thereafter, the Chief of the Border Patrol shall develop metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security between ports of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
An unlawful border crossing effectiveness rate, informed by situational awareness.
(B)
A probability of detection that measures the estimated total unlawful border crossing attempts not detected by the Border Patrol against the unlawful border crossing effectiveness rate referred to in subparagraph (A).
(C)
A weight-to-frequency rate which measures the average weight of marijuana seized per seizure by the Border Patrol in any fiscal year compared to such a weight-to-frequency rate for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(D)
A situational awareness achievement metric that measures the amount of situational awareness achieved in each Border Patrol sector.
(E)
An illicit drugs seizure rate which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Border Patrol in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Border Patrol for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(F)
changed
In consultation with the Office of National Drug Control Policy and the United States Southern Command, a cocaine seizure effectiveness rate measured as a percentage that results from dividing the amount of cocaine seized by the Border Patrol by the total documented cocaine flow rate between ports of entry along the southern land border.
(G)
Estimates, using alternative methodologies, including recidivism data, survey data, known-flow data, and technologically measured data, of total attempted unlawful border crossings, the rate of apprehension of attempted unlawful border crossers, and the inflow into the United States of unlawful border crossers who evade apprehension.
(H)
Estimates of the impact of the Border Patrol’s Consequence Delivery System on the rate of recidivism of unlawful border crossers.
(2)
Metrics consultation— In developing the metrics required under paragraph (1), the Chief of the Border Patrol shall consult with staff members of the Office of Policy at the Department of Homeland Security and staff members of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security. Such staff members may not be political appointees.
(3)
Metrics not reviewable— The metrics required under paragraph (1) may not be reviewed or otherwise amended by the President, any staff employed by the Executive Office of the President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or the Deputy Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the submission of such metrics to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and Comptroller General of the United States, as required under subsection (m). The prohibition described in this paragraph does not apply to the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(i)
Metrics for securing the border at ports of entry—
(1)
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Field Operations in U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall develop metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security at ports of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
An inadmissible border crossing rate which measures the number of known inadmissible border crossers who are denied entry, excluding those border crossers who voluntarily withdraw their applications for admission, divided by the total estimated number of inadmissible border crossers who attempt entry.
(B)
An illicit drugs seizure rate which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(C)
In consultation with the Office of National Drug Control Policy and the United States Southern Command, a cocaine seizure effectiveness rate measured as a percentage that results from dividing the amount of cocaine seized by the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection by the total documented cocaine flow rate at ports of entry along the southern land border.
(D)
Estimates, using alternative methodologies, including survey data and randomized secondary screening data, of total attempted inadmissible border crossers, the rate of apprehension of attempted inadmissible border crossers, and the inflow into the United States of inadmissible border crossers who evade apprehension.
(E)
The number of infractions related to personnel and cargo committed by major violators who are apprehended by the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection at ports of entry, and the estimated number of such infractions committed by major violators who are not apprehended.
(F)
A measurement of how border security operations affect crossing times.
(G)
added
The amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection at United States seaports during the previous fiscal year.
(H)
added
A cargo scanning rate that measures the number of cargo containers scanned by the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection at each United States seaport during the previous fiscal year against the total number of cargo containers entering the United States at each seaport during the previous fiscal year.
(2)
Metrics consultation— In developing the metrics required under paragraph (1), the Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Field Operations shall consult with staff members of the Office of Policy at the Department of Homeland Security and staff members of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security. Such staff members may not be political appointees.
(3)
Metrics not reviewable— The metrics required under paragraph (1) may not be reviewed or otherwise amended by the President, any staff employed by the Executive Office of the President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or the Deputy Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the submission of such metrics to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States, as required under subsection (m). The prohibition described in this paragraph does not apply to the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(j)
Metrics for securing the maritime border—
(1)
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard and the Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Air and Marine for U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall jointly implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security in the maritime environment, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
An estimate of the total number of undocumented migrants the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to interdict.
(B)
An undocumented migrant interdiction rate which measures the flow of undocumented migrants interdicted against the total estimated number of undocumented migrants the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to interdict.
(C)
An illicit drugs removal rate which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components inside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components inside a transit zone for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(D)
An illicit drugs removal rate which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components outside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components outside a transit zone for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(E)
A cocaine removal effectiveness rate inside a transit zone.
(F)
A cocaine removal effectiveness rate outside a transit zone.
(G)
A response rate which measures the ability of the maritime security components of the Department of Homeland Security to respond to and resolve known maritime threats, both inside and outside a transit zone, by placing assets on-scene, compared to the total number of events with respect to which the Department has known threat information.
(2)
Metrics consultation— In developing the metrics required under paragraph (1), the Commandant of the Coast Guard and the Assistant Commissioner for Air and Marine shall consult with staff members of the Office of Policy at the Department of Homeland Security and staff members of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security. Such staff members may not be political appointees.
(3)
Metrics not reviewable— The metrics required under paragraph (1) may not be reviewed or otherwise amended by the President, any staff employed by the Executive Office of the President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or the Deputy Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the submission of such metrics to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States, as required under subsection (m). The prohibition described in this paragraph does not apply to the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(k)
Air and marine security metrics in the land domain—
(1)
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Air and Marine for U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security in the aviation environment, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
A requirement effectiveness rate which measures U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine flight hours requirements against the number of flight hours actually flown by such Office.
(B)
A funded flight hours effectiveness rate which measures the number of funded flight hours appropriated to U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine against the number of actual flight hours flown by such Office.
(C)
A readiness rate which measures the number of aviation missions flown by U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine against the number of aviation missions cancelled by such Office due to weather, maintenance, operations, or other causes.
(D)
The number of subjects detected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine through the use of unmanned aerial systems.
(E)
The number of apprehensions assisted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine through the use of unmanned aerial systems.
(F)
The number and quantity of illicit drug seizures assisted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Air and Marine through the use of unmanned aerial systems.
(G)
added
A detailed description of how, where, and for how long data and images collected through the use of unmanned aerial systems by U.S. Customs and Border Protection is collected and stored.
(2)
Metrics consultation— In developing the metrics required under paragraph (1), the Assistant Commissioner for Air and Marine shall consult with staff members of the Office of Policy at the Department of Homeland Security and staff members of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Homeland Security. Such staff members may not be political appointees.
(3)
Metrics not reviewable— The metrics required under paragraph (1) may not be reviewed or otherwise amended by the President, any staff employed by the Executive Office of the President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or the Deputy Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the submission to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States, as required under subsection (m). The prohibition described in this paragraph does not apply to the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(l)
Penalties for failure To submit metrics—
(1)
changed
In general— If any of the officials referred to in subsection (h), (i), (j), or (k) fail to meet any of the deadlines required under any of such subsections, no political appointee of the Department of Homeland Security may perform any function described in paragraph (2) until all such officials have meet met all of such deadlines.
(2)
Functions described— The functions described in this paragraph are the following:
(A)
Travel using Government aircraft.
(B)
Receipt of any non-essential training.
(C)
Receipt of bonus pay, excluding overtime pay.
(D)
Receipt of any salary increase.
(m)
Evaluation by the Government Accountability Office—
(1)
In general— The metrics required under subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k) shall be made available to the appropriate congressional committees, the BSVC, and the Comptroller General of the United States, together with the data and methodology used to develop such metrics.
(2)
Report— Not later than 270 days after receiving the data and methodology referred to in paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC a report on the suitability and statistical validity of such data and methodology, and shall make recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security for other suitable metrics that may be used to measure the effectiveness of border security. Such report shall inform the BSVC in reviewing the notifications required under subsection (n)(2).
(n)
BSVC certification of metrics and operational control—
(1)
Secretary of Homeland Security notifications—
(A)
Two years— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas have been achieved by the date that is not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, under penalty of perjury, submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC a notification that so attests.
(B)
Five years— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that operational control along the southern land border of the United States has been achieved by the date that is not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, under penalty of perjury, submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC a notification that so attests.
(C)
Annual updates— Every year beginning with the year after the Secretary of Homeland Security submits the notification under subparagraph (B), if the Secretary determines that operational control along the southern land border of the United States is being maintained, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC a notification that so attests.
(A)
Operational control reviews— The BSVC shall review the notifications of the Secretary of Homeland Security under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) to assess such notifications relating to the achievement of situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, in accordance with such subparagraphs.
(B)
Review of metrics— Beginning with the second annual submission of each of the metrics required under subsection (m) and pursuant to subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k) and annually thereafter until the termination of the BSVC under section 4(q), the BSVC shall review such metrics to assess the statistical validity and methodology of the data used to implement such metrics.
(i)
Operational control— Not later than 120 days after conducting a review described in subparagraph (A), the BSVC shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of each such review and a certification of the accuracy of the notification reviewed, in accordance with subparagraph (D).
(ii)
Operational control not achieved— If the BSVC determines that any notification required under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) is not accurate, the BSVC shall include in the report under clause (i) an explanation of why situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, was not achieved. Such explanation shall include, at a minimum—
(I)
impediments incurred;
(II)
potential remedies; and
(III)
recommendations to achieve situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be.
(iii)
Metrics— Not later than 120 days after conducting a review described in subparagraph (B), the BSVC shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of each such review and a determination of the accuracy of the metrics implemented under subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k).
(D)
Operational control certification—
(i)
In general— For purposes of subparagraph (C)(i), the BSVC shall certify the accuracy of a notification of the Secretary if four members of the BSVC vote that such certification is accurate.
(ii)
Public voting— A vote referred to under clause (i) shall be conducted in public.
(iii)
changed
Consultation— Before conducting a vote referred to in clause (i), the BSVC shall consult with the governors of each southern land border State, representatives of the National Border Patrol Council, representatives of the ranching industry in each southern land border State, and relevant State and local government agencies that have jurisdiction on the southern land border.
(E)
Metrics determination— For purposes of subparagraph (C)(iii), the BSVC shall concur in the accuracy of the metrics required under subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k) if four members of the BSVC vote that such certification is accurate.
(o)
changed
Failure To to achieve operational control—
(A)
changed
In general— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, has not been achieved by the dates referred to in subsection (n)(1) (and thus fails to submit a notification to the BSVC), or if the BSVC determines pursuant to subsection (n)(2) that the Secretary has failed to achieve situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas or has failed to achieve operational control along the southern land border by such respective dates, no political appointee of the Department of Homeland Security may perform any function described in subparagraph (B) until the BSVC certifies that the Secretary has achieved such situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be.
(B)
Functions described— The functions described in this subparagraph are each of the following:
(i)
Travel using Government aircraft.
(ii)
Receipt of any non-essential training, including conferences.
(iii)
changed
Receipt of bonus pay, excluding overtime pay.
(iv)
Receipt of any salary increase.
(2)
National security exception— The Secretary of Homeland Security may waive the travel prohibition in paragraph (1)(B)(i) if the Secretary determines and notifies the appropriate congressional committees that—
(A)
such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States; or
(B)
changed
such travel is being carried out to achieve operational control of the southern land border of the United States.
(3)
changed
Further action required— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situation situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, has not been achieved by the dates referred to in subsection (n)(1) (and thus fails to submit a notification to the BSVC), or if the BSVC determines pursuant to subsection (n)(2) that the Secretary has failed to achieve situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas or fails to achieve operational control along the southern land border by such respective dates, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, within 180 days, submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the BSVC and implement a revised plan to achieve situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, that adopts the recommendations of the BSVC referred to in subsection (n)(2)(C)(ii)(III).
(p)
Reports— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes each of the following:
(1)
A resource allocation model for current and future year staffing requirements that includes optimal staffing levels at all land, air, and sea ports of entry, and an explanation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection methodology for aligning staffing levels and workload to threats and vulnerabilities and their effects on cross border trade and passenger travel across all mission areas.
(2)
Detailed information on the level of manpower available at all land, air, and sea ports of entry and between ports of entry, including the number of canine and agricultural specialists assigned to each such port of entry.
(3)
Detailed information describing the difference between the staffing the model suggests and the actual staffing at each port of entry and between the ports of entry.
(4)
Monthly per passenger wait times, including data on per passenger processing wait times at all land, air, and sea ports of entry.
(5)
A description of the infrastructure, security resources, and other measures that are necessary to achieve substantial reductions in the average wait times of vehicles at land border ports of entry.
(q)
added
Adherence to certain standards— The Under Secretary for Management of the Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Administration of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall ensure component program managers who are responsible for carrying out subsections (b) and (c) adhere to internal control standards identified by the Comptroller General of the United States. The Assistant Commissioner shall provide information, as needed, to assist the Under Secretary for Management in monitoring proper program management of border security programs carried out pursuant to such subsections.
Sec. 13
Prohibition on actions that impede border security on certain Federal land
(a)
changed
Establishment—Prohibition on Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall—the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture shall not impede, prohibit, or restrict activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection on Federal land located within 100 miles of the United States border with Mexico and the United States border with Canada that is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture, to execute search and rescue operations, and to prevent all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband through such international borders. These authorities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection on such Federal land apply whether or not a state of emergency exists.
(b)
added
Authorized activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection— U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall have immediate access to Federal land within 100 miles of the United States borders with Mexico and Canada that are under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture for purposes of conducting the following activities on such land to prevent all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband through such international border:
(1)
added
Construction and maintenance of roads.
(1)
removed
not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate congressional committees an implementation plan to establish a biometric exit data system to complete the integrated biometric entry and exit data system required under section 7208 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 1365b), including—
(A)
removed
an integrated master schedule and cost estimate, including requirements and design, development, operational, and maintenance costs, of such a system that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(B)
removed
cost-effective staffing and personnel requirements of such a system that leverages existing resources of the Department of Homeland Security that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(C)
removed
a consideration of training programs necessary to establish such a system that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(D)
removed
a consideration of how such a system will affect wait times that takes into account prior reports on such matter issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(E)
removed
information received after consultation with private sector stakeholders, including—
(i)
removed
the trucking industry;
(ii)
removed
the airport industry;
(iii)
removed
the airline industry;
(iv)
removed
the seaport industry;
(v)
removed
the travel industry; and
(vi)
removed
the biometric technology industry;
(F)
removed
a consideration of how trusted traveler programs in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act may be impacted by, or incorporated into, such a system;
(G)
removed
defined metrics of success and milestones;
(H)
removed
identified risks and mitigation strategies to address such risks; and
(I)
removed
a consideration of how other countries have implemented a biometric exit data system; and
(2)
removed
not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, establish a biometric exit data system at—
(A)
removed
the 15 United States airports that support the highest volume of international air travel, as determined by available Federal flight data;
(B)
removed
the 15 United States seaports that support the highest volume of international sea travel, as determined by available Federal travel data; and
(C)
removed
the 15 United States land ports of entry that support the highest volume of pedestrian crossings, as determined by available Federal border crossing data.
(b)
removed
Implementation—
(1)
removed
Pilot program at land ports of entry for non-pedestrian outbound traffic— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in collaboration with industry stakeholders, shall establish a six-month pilot program to test the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) on non-pedestrian outbound traffic at not fewer than three land ports of entry with significant cross-border traffic, including at not fewer than two land ports of entry on the southern border and at least one land port of entry on the northern border. Such pilot program may include a consideration of more than one biometric mode, and shall be implemented to determine the following:
(A)
removed
How a nationwide implementation of such biometric exit data system at land ports of entry shall be carried out.
(B)
removed
The infrastructure required to carry out subparagraph (A).
(C)
removed
The effects of such pilot program on legitimate travel and trade.
(D)
removed
The effects of such pilot program on wait times, including processing times, for such non-pedestrian traffic.
(E)
removed
Its effectiveness in combating terrorism.
(2)
removed
At land ports of entry for non-pedestrian outbound traffic—
(A)
removed
In general— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) to all land ports of entry, and such system shall apply only in the case of non-pedestrian outbound traffic.
(B)
removed
Extension— The Secretary of Homeland Security may extend by two years the initial date specified in subparagraph (A), and may renew such extension for a single additional two-year period, if the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the 15 land ports of entry that support the highest volume of passenger vehicles, as determined by available Federal data, do not have the physical infrastructure or characteristics to install the systems necessary to implement a biometric exit data system.
(2)
changed
At air and sea ports of entry— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) to all air Construction and sea ports maintenance of entry.barriers.
(3)
changed
At land ports of entry for pedestrians— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary Use of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) vehicles to all land ports of entry, and such system shall apply only in the case of pedestrians.patrol, apprehend, or rescue.
(4)
added
Installation, maintenance, and operation of communications and surveillance equipment and sensors.
(5)
added
Deployment of temporary tactical infrastructure.
(c)
added
Clarification relating to waiver authority—
(1)
added
In general— Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including any termination date relating to the waiver referred to in this subsection), the waiver by the Secretary of Homeland Security on April 1, 2008, under section 102(c)(1) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note; Public Law 104–208) of the laws described in paragraph (2) with respect to certain sections of the international borders between the United States and Mexico and the United States and Canada shall be considered to apply to all Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture within 100 miles of such international borders for the activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection described in subsection (b).
(2)
added
Description of laws waived— The laws referred to in paragraph (1) are limited to the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), Public Law 86–523 (16 U.S.C. 469 et seq.), the Act of June 8, 1906 (commonly known as the “Antiquities Act of 1906”; 16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.), the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742a et seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Administrative Procedure Act”), the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), the General Authorities Act of 1970 (Public Law 91–383) (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.), sections 401(7), 403, and 404 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–625, 92 Stat. 3467), and the Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 101–628).
(c)
removed
Effects on air, sea, and land transportation— The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with appropriate private sector stakeholders, shall ensure that the collection of biometric data under this section causes the least possible disruption to the movement of people or cargo in air, sea, or land transportation.
(d)
changed
Termination Protection of proceeding—legal uses— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, on the date of the enactment of this Act, terminate the proceeding entitled Collection of Alien Biometric Data Upon Exit From the United States at Air and Sea Ports of Departure, issued on April 24, 2008 (73 C.F.R. 22065; DHS Docket No. 2008–0039).This section may not be construed to provide—
(1)
added
authority to restrict legal uses, such as grazing, hunting, mining, or public-use recreational and backcountry airstrips on land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture; or
(2)
added
any additional authority to restrict legal access to such land.
(e)
changed
Data-Matching—Effect on state and private land— The biometric exit data system established under this This section shall—
(1)
changed
require that the biometric data that is obtained for a person upon entry to the United States is matched against the biometric data of such person when such person exits the United States;have no force or effect on State or private lands; and
(2)
changed
leverage the infrastructure and databases of the current entry system established pursuant not provide authority on or access to section 7208 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 1365b) for the purpose described in paragraph (1); andState or private lands.
(f)
added
Tribal sovereignty— Nothing in this section supersedes, replaces, negates, or diminishes treaties or other agreements between the United States and Indian tribes.
(3)
removed
be interoperable with, and allow matching against, other Federal databases that store biometrics of known or suspected terrorists.
(1)
removed
In general— The biometric exit data system established under this section shall include a requirement for the collection of biometric exit data for all categories of individuals who are required to provide biometric entry data.
(2)
removed
Exception— This section shall not apply in the case of a citizen of the United States.
(g)
removed
Collection of data— The Secretary of Homeland Security may not require any non-Federal person to collect biometric data pursuant to the biometric exit data system established under this section, except through a contractual agreement.
(h)
removed
Multi-Modal collection— In carrying out subsections (a)(1) and (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall make every effort to collect biometric data using additional modes of biometric technology.
(i)
removed
Penalties for failure To meet deadlines—
(1)
removed
Biometric exit data system— If the Secretary fails to meet any of the following requirements by the applicable deadline, no political appointee of the Department of Homeland Security may perform any function described in paragraph (2) until the Secretary has complied with the requirement:
(A)
removed
The submission of the implementation plan under subsection (a)(1).
(B)
removed
The establishment of a biometric exit data system under subsection (a)(2).
(C)
removed
The establishment a six-month pilot program to test such biometric exit data system under subsection (b)(1)(A).
(D)
removed
The expansion of such biometric exit data system under subsection (b)(2)(A).
(E)
removed
Any extension of the deadline for such expansion authorized by the Secretary under subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii).
(2)
removed
Functions described— The functions described in this subparagraph are each of the following:
(A)
removed
Travel using government aircraft.
(B)
removed
Receipt of any non-essential training.
(C)
removed
Receipt of bonus pay, excluding overtime pay.
(D)
removed
Receipt of any salary increase.
Sec. 14
Biometric exit data system
(a)
changed
In general—Establishment— Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a northern border threat analysis. Such analysis, at a minimum, shall include the following:shall—
(1)
changed
An analysis not later than 180 days after the date of current the enactment of this Act, submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and potential terrorism threats posed by individuals seeking the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate an implementation plan to enter establish a biometric exit data system to complete the United States through integrated biometric entry and exit data system required under section 7208 of the northern border.Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 1365b), including—
(A)
added
an integrated master schedule and cost estimate, including requirements and design, development, operational, and maintenance costs, of such a system that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(B)
added
cost-effective staffing and personnel requirements of such a system that leverages existing resources of the Department of Homeland Security that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(C)
added
a consideration of training programs necessary to establish such a system that takes into account prior reports on such matters issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(D)
added
a consideration of how such a system will affect wait times that takes into account prior reports on such matter issued by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security;
(E)
added
information received after consultation with private sector stakeholders, including—
(i)
added
the trucking industry;
(ii)
added
the airport industry;
(iii)
added
the airline industry;
(iv)
added
the seaport industry;
(v)
added
the travel industry; and
(vi)
added
the biometric technology industry;
(F)
added
a consideration of how trusted traveler programs in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act may be impacted by, or incorporated into, such a system;
(G)
added
defined metrics of success and milestones;
(H)
added
identified risks and mitigation strategies to address such risks; and
(I)
added
a consideration of how other countries have implemented a biometric exit data system; and
(2)
changed
An analysis of improvements needed at ports of entry along not later than two years after the northern border to prevent terrorists and instruments date of terror from entering the United States.enactment of this Act, establish a biometric exit data system at—
(A)
added
the 15 United States airports that support the highest volume of international air travel, as determined by available Federal flight data;
(B)
added
the 15 United States seaports that support the highest volume of international sea travel, as determined by available Federal travel data; and
(C)
added
the 15 United States land ports of entry that support the highest volume of pedestrian crossings, as determined by available Federal border crossing data.
(b)
added
Implementation—
(1)
added
Pilot program at land ports of entry for non-pedestrian outbound traffic— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in collaboration with industry stakeholders, shall establish a six-month pilot program to test the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) on non-pedestrian outbound traffic at not fewer than three land ports of entry with significant cross-border traffic, including at not fewer than two land ports of entry on the southern land border and at least one land port of entry on the northern land border. Such pilot program may include a consideration of more than one biometric mode, and shall be implemented to determine the following:
(A)
added
How a nationwide implementation of such biometric exit data system at land ports of entry shall be carried out.
(B)
added
The infrastructure required to carry out subparagraph (A).
(C)
added
The effects of such pilot program on legitimate travel and trade.
(D)
added
The effects of such pilot program on wait times, including processing times, for such non-pedestrian traffic.
(E)
added
Its effectiveness in combating terrorism.
(F)
added
Its effectiveness in identifying visa holders who violate the terms of their visas.
(2)
added
At land ports of entry for non-pedestrian outbound traffic—
(A)
added
In general— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) to all land ports of entry, and such system shall apply only in the case of non-pedestrian outbound traffic.
(B)
added
Extension— The Secretary of Homeland Security may extend for a single two year period the date specified in subparagraph (A) if the Secretary certifies to the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate that the 15 land ports of entry that support the highest volume of passenger vehicles, as determined by available Federal data, do not have the physical infrastructure or characteristics to install the systems necessary to implement a biometric exit data system.
(3)
added
At air and sea ports of entry— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) to all air and sea ports of entry.
(4)
added
At land ports of entry for pedestrians— Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the biometric exit data system referred to in subsection (a)(2) to all land ports of entry, and such system shall apply only in the case of pedestrians.
(c)
added
Effects on air, sea, and land transportation— The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with appropriate private sector stakeholders, shall ensure that the collection of biometric data under this section causes the least possible disruption to the movement of people or cargo in air, sea, or land transportation, while fulfilling the goals of improving counterterrorism efforts and identifying visa holders who violate the terms of their visas.
(d)
added
Termination of proceeding— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, on the date of the enactment of this Act, terminate the proceeding entitled Collection of Alien Biometric Data Upon Exit From the United States at Air and Sea Ports of Departure, issued on April 24, 2008 (73 C.F.R. 22065; DHS Docket No. 2008–0039).
(e)
added
Data-Matching— The biometric exit data system established under this section shall—
(1)
added
require that the biometric data that is obtained for a person upon entry to the United States is matched against the biometric data of such person when such person exits the United States;
(2)
added
leverage the infrastructure and databases of the current entry system established pursuant to section 7208 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 1365b) for the purpose described in paragraph (1); and
(3)
added
be interoperable with, and allow matching against, other Federal databases that store biometrics of known or suspected terrorists, and visa holders who have violated the terms of their visas.
(1)
added
In general— The biometric exit data system established under this section shall include a requirement for the collection of biometric exit data for all categories of individuals who are required to provide biometric entry data.
(2)
added
Exception— This section shall not apply in the case of a citizen of the United States.
(g)
added
Collection of data— The Secretary of Homeland Security may not require any non-Federal person to collect biometric data pursuant to the biometric exit data system established under this section, except through a contractual agreement.
(h)
added
Multi-modal collection— In carrying out subsections (a)(1) and (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall make every effort to collect biometric data using additional modes of biometric technology.
(i)
added
Penalties for failure to meet deadlines—
(1)
added
Biometric exit data system— If the Secretary fails to meet any of the following requirements by the applicable deadline, no political appointee of the Department of Homeland Security may perform any function described in paragraph (2) until the Secretary has complied with the requirement:
(A)
added
The submission of the implementation plan under subsection (a)(1).
(B)
added
The establishment of a biometric exit data system under subsection (a)(2).
(C)
added
The establishment a six-month pilot program to test such biometric exit data system under subsection (b)(1)(A).
(D)
added
The expansion of such biometric exit data system under subsection (b)(2)(A).
(E)
added
Any extension of the deadline for such expansion authorized by the Secretary under subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii).
(2)
added
Functions described— The functions described in this subparagraph are each of the following:
(A)
added
Travel using government aircraft.
(B)
added
Receipt of any non-essential training.
(C)
added
Receipt of bonus pay.
(D)
added
Receipt of any salary increase.
(j)
added
Congressional review— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate reports and recommendations of the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate’s Air Entry and Exit Re-Engineering Program and the reports and recommendations of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection entry and exit mobility program demonstrations.
(3)
removed
An analysis of gaps in law, policy, international agreements, or tribal agreements that hinder the border security and counter-terrorism efforts along the northern border.
(4)
removed
An analysis of unlawful cross border activity between ports of entry, including the maritime borders of the Great Lakes.
(b)
removed
Classified threat analysis— The threat analysis required under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that such is appropriate.
Sec. 15
Northern border threat analysis
(a)
changed
In general— Title XX Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended by adding shall submit to the following new subtitle:appropriate congressional committees a northern border threat analysis. Such analysis, at a minimum, shall include the following:
(1)
added
An analysis of current and potential terrorism threats posed by individuals seeking to enter the United States through the northern border.
(2)
added
An analysis of improvements needed at ports of entry along the northern border to prevent terrorists and instruments of terror from entering the United States.
(3)
added
An analysis of gaps in law, policy, international agreements, or tribal agreements that hinder the border security and counter-terrorism efforts along the northern border.
(4)
added
An analysis of unlawful cross border activity between ports of entry, including the maritime borders of the Great Lakes.
removed
“C Other Grant Programs
removed
“2031. Operation Stonegarden
removed
“(a) Establishment—There is established in the Department a program to be known as “Operation Stonegarden”. Under such program, the Secretary, acting through the Administrator, shall make grants to eligible law enforcement agencies to enhance border security in accordance with this section.
removed
“(b) Eligible recipients—To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a law enforcement agency shall—
removed
“(1) be located in—
removed
“(A) a State bordering either Canada or Mexico; or
removed
“(B) a State or territory with a maritime border; and
removed
“(2) be involved in an active ongoing U.S. Customs and Border Protection operation coordinated through a sector office.
removed
“(c) Permitted uses—The recipient of a grant under this section may use the grant for any of the following activities:
removed
“(1) Equipment, including maintenance and sustainment costs.
removed
“(2) Personnel, including overtime and backfill, in support of enhanced border law enforcement activities.
removed
“(3) Any activity permitted under the Department of Homeland Security’s Fiscal Year 2014 Funding Opportunity Announcement for Operation Stonegarden.
removed
“(4) Any other appropriate activity, as determined by the Administrator.
removed
“(d) Authorization of appropriations—There is authorized to be appropriated $110,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019 for grants under this section.
removed
“(e) Report—The Administrator shall annually submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report containing information on the expenditure of grants made under this section by each grant recipient.”
(b)
changed
Clerical amendment—Classified threat analysis— The table of contents threat analysis required under subsection (a) may be submitted in section 1(b) classified form, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that such Act is amended by inserting after the items relating to subtitle B of title XX the following new items:appropriate.
(c)
added
Required northern border capability deployment— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the appropriate component of the Department of Homeland Security, shall, at a minimum, deploy to each sector of the northern border, in a prioritized, risk-based manner, the following additional capabilities:
(1)
added
Blaine sector— For the Blaine sector, the following:
(A)
added
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(C)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(D)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(E)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(F)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(G)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(H)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(I)
added
Increased maritime interdiction capabilities.
(2)
added
Spokane sector— For the Spokane sector, the following:
(A)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(C)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(E)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(F)
added
Completion of six miles of the Bog Creek road.
(G)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(H)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(3)
added
Havre sector— For the Havre sector, the following:
(A)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(C)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(E)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(F)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(G)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(4)
added
Grand Forks sector— For the Grand Forks sector, the following:
(A)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(C)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(E)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(F)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(G)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(5)
added
Detroit sector— For the Detroit sector, the following:
(A)
added
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(C)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(D)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(E)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(F)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(G)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(H)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(I)
added
Increased maritime interdiction capabilities.
(6)
added
Buffalo sector— For the Buffalo sector, the following:
(A)
added
Coastal radar surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(C)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(D)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(E)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(F)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(G)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(H)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(I)
added
Increased maritime interdiction capabilities.
(7)
added
Swanton sector— For the Swanton sector, the following:
(A)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(C)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(E)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(F)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(G)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(8)
added
Houlton sector— For the Houlton sector, the following:
(A)
added
Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-portable surveillance systems.
(B)
added
Advanced unattended surveillance sensors.
(C)
added
Improved agent communications capabilities.
(D)
added
Increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction, and monitoring operations capability.
(E)
added
Man-portable unmanned aerial vehicles.
(F)
added
Ultralight aircraft detection capabilities.
(G)
added
Modernized port of entry surveillance capabilities.
(d)
added
Adherence to certain standards— The Under Secretary for Management of the Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Administration of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall ensure component program managers who are responsible for carrying out this section adhere to internal control standards identified by the Comptroller General of the United States. The Assistant Commissioner shall provide information, as needed, to assist the Under Secretary for Management in monitoring proper program management of border security programs carried out pursuant to this section.