H.R. 3102 — what changed

“1602. Risk-based screening of employees at airports

“(a) Screening model

“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator shall establish a risk-based, intelligence-driven model for the screening of employees at airports based on level of access and employment positions at domestic airports. Such screening model shall—

“(A) ensure that only those individuals authorized to have access to the secure areas of a domestic airport are permitted such access;

“(B) ensure that an individual is immediately denied entry to a secure area when such individual’s access authorization for such secure area is withdrawn; and

“(C) provide a means to differentiate between individuals authorized to have access to an entire secure area and individuals authorized access to only a particular portion of a secure area.

“(2) Factors—The Administrator shall consider the following factors when establishing the screening model described in paragraph (1):

“(A) Whether and how often employees at airports require employment-related access to Secure Identification Display Areas, Airport Operations Areas, or secure areas.

“(B) The ability of each airport operator to reduce employee entry and exit points to a mutually agreed upon minimum number of such entry and exit points necessary to maintain airport operations.

changed “(C) In consultation with airport operators, the ability of the Administration to create a mutually agreed upon randomization plan for screening at the defined operational minimum entry and exit points at airports which maximizes the deterrent effect of screening efforts.

“(b) Disqualifying offenses

changed “(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Investigation, labor organizations representing aviation, ground, and cabin crew workers, and the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall conduct an aviation security risk-based review of the disqualifying criminal offenses codified in sections 1542.209 and 1544.229 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to determine adequacy the appropriateness of such offenses as a basis for an individual denying to have continued an employee a credential that allows unescorted access to Secure Identification Display Areas of airports. Such review shall determine consider the following:

changed “(A) The effectiveness adequacy of the currently codified disqualifying offenses regarding disqualifying certain individuals from occupying such a position of significant public trust.to address the current aviation security threat environment, particularly the terrorism insider threat.

changed “(B) If such codified disqualifying offenses list should be amended tailored to include address the current aviation security threat environment, particularly the terrorism insider threat, by excluding or including other offenses.

changed “(C) The feasibility of potential security benefits, drawbacks, and challenges associated with identifying patterns of misdemeanors or of other non-disqualifying offenses that could jeopardize aviation security.

“(D) The feasibility of integrating similar departmental eligibility requirements for access to Secure Identification Display Areas of airports.

changed “(E) Whether If the ten year look-back period for disqualifying offenses should be extended or modified.is appropriate, in light of the current aviation security threat environment, particularly the terrorism insider threat.

changed “(2) Briefing to Congress—Upon completion Waiver—Not later than 180 days after the date of the review required under paragraph (1), enactment of this section, the Administrator shall brief the Committee on Homeland Security of the House provide an adequate redress process for an employee who is subject to an adverse employment decision, including removal or suspension of Representatives and such employee, due to a disqualifying offense referred to in paragraph (1), that is consistent with the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs appeals and the Committee on Commerce, Science, waiver process established for applicants for commercial motor vehicle hazardous materials endorsements and Transportation of the Senate on the results transportation workers at ports under section 70105(c) of such review.title 46, United States Code.

added “(3) Notice—Any changes to the Secure Identification Display area badge program, such as changes considered pursuant to subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1) shall be subject to notice of proposed rulemaking.

added “(4) Briefing to Congress—Upon completion of the aviation security risk-based review required under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall brief the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the results of such review.

“(c) Credentialing—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator, in consultation with the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall review the auditing procedures for all airport-issued identification media. Such review shall determine the following:

“(1) The efficacy of the auditing program requirements at domestic airports to ensure the integrity, accountability, and control of airport-issued identification media.

“(2) The feasibility of including biometrics standards for all airport-issued identification media used for identity verification and badge verification.

“(3) The feasibility of integrating other departmental programs’ eligibility requirements for access to secure areas of airports.

“(d) Vetting

“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator shall—

“(A) establish a program to allow airport badging offices to utilize the employment eligibility confirmation system established under section 404 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note; commonly referred to as “E-Verify”) to determine the eligibility to work in the United States of all applicants seeking access to secure areas of airports;

“(B) establish a process to transmit applicants’ biometric fingerprint data to the Office of Biometric Identity Management’s (OBIM’s) Automated Biometrics Identification System (IDENT) for vetting; and

“(C) conduct a data quality assessment to ensure that credential application data elements received by the Administration are complete and match the data submitted by the airport operators.

“(2) Briefing to Congress—Upon completion of the responsibilities specified in paragraph (1), the Administrator shall brief the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the results of such completion.

“(e) Reporting of violations—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator shall establish a nationwide program for the anonymous reporting of violations of airport security.

“(f) Centralized database—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator, in consultation with the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall—

removed “(1) establish a national database of employees who have had either their airport or aircraft operator-issued badge revoked for cause; and

removed “(2) determine the appropriate reporting mechanisms for airports and airlines to submit data regarding employees described in paragraph (1) and to access the database established pursuant to such paragraph.

changed “(g) Updated review—Not later than April 8, 2016, the Aviation Security Advisory Committee shall conduct an updated and thorough review “(1) establish a national database of employees who have had either their airport access controls.or aircraft operator-issued badge revoked for failure to comply with aviation security requirements;

added “(2) determine the appropriate reporting mechanisms for airports and airlines to submit data regarding employees described in paragraph (1) and to access the database established pursuant to such paragraph; and

added “(3) establish a process that allows individuals whose names were mistakenly entered into such database to have their names removed and have their credentialing restored.

added “(g) Updated review—Not later than April 8, 2016, the Administrator, in consultation with the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall conduct an updated and thorough review of airport access controls.

“(h) Employee screening study

“(1) In general—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Administrator, in consultation with the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Comptroller General of the United States a cost and feasibility study of a statistically significant number of Category I, II, and X airports, that ensures that all employee entry and exit points that lead to secure areas of such airports are comprised of the following:

“(A) A secure door utilizing card and pin entry or biometric technology.

“(B) Surveillance video recording, capable of storing video data for at least 30 days.

“(C) Advanced screening technologies, including at least one of the following:

“(i) Magnetometer (walk-through or hand-held).

“(ii) Explosives detection canines.

“(iii) Explosives trace detection swabbing.

“(iv) Advanced imaging technology.

“(v) X-ray bag screening technology.

“(2) Contents—The study required under paragraph (1) shall include information related to the employee screening costs of those airports which have already implemented practices of screening one-hundred percent of employees entering secure areas of airports, including the following:

“(A) Costs associated with establishing an operational minimum number of employee entry and exit points.

“(B) A comparison of costs associated with implementing the requirements specified in paragraph (1), based on whether such implementation was carried out by the Administration or airports.

“(3) Comptroller General assessment

“(A) In general—Upon completion of the study required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review such study to assess the quality and reliability of such study.

“(B) Assessment—Not later than 60 days after the receipt of the study required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the results of the review required under subparagraph (A).”