Congress finds the following:
(1)
Citizens and taxpayers have a right to know whether federally funded institutions of higher education are treating student applications differently depending on the student’s race, color, or national origin, and, if so, the way in which these factors are weighted and the consequences to students and prospective students of these decisions.
(2)
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 codified this right, forbidding in statute discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin by federally funded institutions, which includes nearly all colleges and universities.
(3)
This prohibition has largely been ignored by the Supreme Court, which has allowed racially discriminatory admissions.
(4)
However, in Fisher v. University of Texas, the United States Supreme Court in 2013 affirmed that strict scrutiny should be applied to university admissions programs to ensure diversity is not defined as “mere racial balancing,” but has a compelling state interest to achieve diversity. The Fisher case clarified that any such discrimination is only permitted if it is necessary to achieve the educational benefits of a racially diverse student body.
(5)
Therefore, colleges and universities must reevaluate their use of racially selective admissions policies. The costs of such policies cannot outweigh the supposed benefits. If a less discriminatory means could achieve similar results, the discrimination is not permissible.
(6)
In order to ensure that these limitations are followed, colleges and federally funded institutions of higher education must make public through annual reports their use of race, color, and national origin, for admissions decisions so that Federal and State enforcement agencies and interested persons can monitor the schools.
(7)
Additionally, college and universities must provide evidence sufficient to demonstrate that any such discrimination does not exceed the limits imposed by the Fisher case.
(8)
Academic “mismatch” refers to a significant discrepancy in academic qualifications between various groups within a student body, and is encouraged when universities lower their academic standards to artificially achieve a particular composition.
(9)
Mismatch works a harm because it sets particular students up for lower than average achievement, higher dropout rates, less competitive majors and, perhaps most damaging, a disproportionately large student loan burden.