Section 1 Advisory committee process
“(B) For review by a classification panel of a premarket submission for a device, the Secretary shall—
“(i) provide an opportunity for the person whose premarket submission is subject to panel review to provide recommendations on the expertise needed among the voting members of the panel; and
“(ii) give due consideration to such recommendations and ensure that adequate expertise is represented on advisory panels to assess—
“(I) the disease or condition for which the device is intended to cure, treat, mitigate, prevent, or diagnose; and
“(II) the technology of the device.
“(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B)(ii), the term “adequate expertise” means that the membership of the classification panel reviewing a premarket submission includes—
“(i) two or more voting members, with a specialty or other expertise clinically relevant to the device under review; and
“(ii) at least one voting member who is knowledgeable about the technology of the device.”
“(B)
“(i) Any meeting of a classification panel with respect to the review of a premarket submission for a device shall—
“(I) provide adequate time for initial presentations by the person whose premarket submission is specifically the subject of such review and by the Secretary; and
“(II) encourage free and open participation by all interested persons.
“(ii) Following the initial presentations described in clause (i), the panel may—
“(I) pose questions to a designated representative described in subparagraph (A)(iii); and
“(II) consider the responses to such questions in the panel’s review of the premarket submission.”