Legal Justice for Servicemembers Act of 2015
A BILL
To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve procedures for legal justice for members of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Improvements to whistleblower protection procedures
“(2) The following actions shall be considered for the purposes of this section to be a personnel action prohibited by this subsection:
“(A) Any action prohibited by paragraph (1) (including the threat to take any unfavorable action, the withholding or threat to withhold any favorable action, making or threatening to make a significant change in the duties or responsibilities of a member of the armed forces not commensurate with the member’s grade, a retaliatory investigation, and the failure of a superior to respond to retaliatory action or harassment by one or more subordinates taken against a member of which the superior knew or should have known).
“(B) Any other action that could be reasonably understood as an attempt to dissuade a member of the armed forces from making or preparing a communication, or participating in any other activity, described in paragraph (1).”
“(E)
“(i) If the Inspector General makes a preliminary determination in an investigation under subparagraph (D) that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred and the personnel action will result in an immediate hardship to the member alleging the personnel action, the Inspector General may impose a stay of the personnel action of not more than 90 days in order to prevent undue hardship to the member.
“(ii) If the Inspector General has not completed the investigation described in clause (i) upon the expiration of the stay of the personnel action with respect to a member imposed by the Inspector General under that clause, the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as applicable, may continue the stay of the personnel action with respect to the member for such additional time as is required for the completion of the investigation by the Inspector General.”
“(3)
“(A) Not later than 180 days after the commencement of an investigation of an allegation under subsection (c)(4), and every 90 days thereafter until the transmission of the report on the investigation under paragraph (1) to the member concerned, the Inspector General conducting the investigation shall submit a notice on the investigation described in subparagraph (B) to the following:
“(i) The member.
“(ii) The Secretary of Defense.
“(iii) The Secretary of the military department concerned, or the Secretary of Homeland Security in the case of a member of the Coast Guard when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy.
“(B) Each notice on an investigation under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
“(i) A description of the current progress of the investigation, including the number of witnesses interviewed and the number of documents reviewed.
“(ii) An estimate of the time remaining until the completion of the investigation and the transmittal of the report required by paragraph (1) to the member concerned.”
“(4) The report on the results of the investigation shall contain the following:
“(A) A thorough review of the facts and circumstances relevant to the allegation and the complaint or disclosure.
“(B) The documents acquired during the course of the investigation, including summaries of interviews conducted.
“(C) A recommendation as to the disposition of the complaint.
“(D) Recommendations, made in consultation with the appropriate Judge Advocate General, for disciplinary actions against the person who committed the prohibited personnel action, against a superior who failed to address such action of which the superior knew or should have known, or both.”
“(B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the correction of military records for further review under subsection (g) unless the member or former member requests, in writing, during the 30-day period beginning on the date of the making of the determination, that the report not be so referred.”
“(2) In resolving an application described in paragraph (1) for which there is a report of the Inspector General under subsection (e)(1), a correction board—
“(A) shall review the report of the Inspector General;
“(B) may request the Inspector General to gather further evidence;
“(C) may receive oral argument, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and take depositions; and
“(D) if requested by the member or former member, in writing, shall hold an evidentiary hearing.
“(3) In resolving an application described in paragraph (1) for which there is no final action of the Inspector General within 365 days after the claimant submits an application to the Inspector General, the correction board—
“(A) may receive oral argument, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and take depositions; and
“(B) if requested by the member or former member, in writing, shall hold an evidentiary hearing.”
“(h) Burdens of proof—The burdens of proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation conducted by an Inspector General, in any board for the correction of military records, and in any review conducted by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, under this section.”
Sec. 3 Improvements to authorities and procedures for the correction of military records
“(3) Each meeting of a board under this subsection, including any evidentiary hearing under paragraph (6), shall, to the extent practicable, have as its presiding officer an administrative judge serving on a part-time basis for that purpose under a contract with the Secretary concerned for that purpose.”
“(4)
“(A) The members of each board under this subsection shall be individuals who, by demonstrated ability, background, training, or experience are especially qualified to carry out the functions of a board under this section. No member of a board may hold another office or position in the Federal Government except as otherwise provided by law.
“(B) The term of service of an individual on a board may not exceed five years.”
“(B) If a board makes a preliminary determination that a claim under this section lacks sufficient information or documents to support the claim, the board shall notify the claimant, in writing, indicating the specific information or documents necessary to make the claim complete and reviewable by the board.
“(C) If a claimant is unable to provide military personnel or medical records applicable to a claim under this section, the board shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the records. A claimant shall provide the board with documentary evidence of the efforts of the claimant to obtain such records. The board shall inform the claimant of the results of the board's efforts, and shall provide the claimant copies of any records so obtained upon request of the claimant.
“(D) Any request for reconsideration of a determination of a board under this section, no matter when filed, shall be reconsidered by a board under this section if supported by materials not previously presented to or considered by the board in making such determination.”
“(6)
“(A) A board shall hold an evidentiary hearing on a claim that presents a genuine issue of material fact, if requested by the claimant.
“(B) A board holding an evidentiary hearing shall have broad discretion (as specified in the procedures required by paragraph (5)) to allow and limit discovery on matters covered by the hearing in order to expedite the hearing and action on the claim concerned.
“(C) A claimant may, at the election and expense of the claimant, be represented by outside counsel in connection with an evidentiary hearing.”
“(7)
“(A) Each final decision of a board under this subsection shall be made available to the public in electronic form on a centralized Internet website. In any decision so made available to the public—
“(i) there shall be redacted all personally identifiable information; but
“(ii) if the decision relates to or arises from an investigation under section 1034 of this title, there shall not be redacted the names and position of such categories of officers investigated, above the grade of lieutenant colonel (or commander in the case of the Navy and the Coast Guard) as the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as applicable, shall prescribe in the procedures under paragraph (5).
“(B)
“(i) Under procedures jointly developed by the Secretaries of the military departments and the Secretary of Homeland Security, each final decision of a board shall be characterized by the board as having precedential value or non-precedential value for purposes of subsequent decisions of boards under this section.
“(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph—
“(I) a decision having precedential value is any decision determined by a board in accordance with the procedures required by clause (i) to add significantly to the case law of boards under this section; and
“(II) a decision having non-precedential value is any decision that does not have precedential value.
“(iii) Any decision having precedential value for purposes of this subparagraph may be cited or referred to by any party in a claim under this section.”
“(B) A claimant may seek judicial review of a determination of a board under this section in an appropriate court of the United States. The scope of judicial review under this subparagraph shall be as specified in section 706 of title 5.”
Sec. 4 Inclusions of Inspectors General of the military departments and certain other inspectors general in Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
“(J) The Inspectors General of the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps, the National Guard Bureau, and the Coast Guard.”