H.R. 1335 — what changed
Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act
From Introduced in House to Reported in House. 6 sections amended and 3 added between Introduced in House and Reported in House.
Sec. 6 Distinguishing between overfished and depleted
changed
“(8a) The term ‘depleted' “depleted” means, with respect to a stock of fish or stock complex, that the stock or stock complex has a biomass that has declined below a level that jeopardizes the capacity of the stock or stock complex to produce maximum sustainable yield on a continuing basis.”
Sec. 7 Transparency and public process
“(G) Each Council shall make available on the Internet Web site of the Council—
“(i) to the extent practicable, a Webcast, an audio recording, or a live broadcast of each meeting of the Council, and of the Council Coordination Committee established under subsection (l), that is not closed in accordance with paragraph (3); and
“(ii) audio, video (if the meeting was in person or by video conference), or a searchable audio or written transcript of each meeting of the Council and of the meetings of committees referred to in section 302(g)(1)(B) of the Council by not later than 30 days after the conclusion of the meeting.
“(H) The Secretary shall maintain and make available to the public an archive of Council and scientific and statistical committee meeting audios, videos, and transcripts made available under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (G).”
“(d) Fishery impact statement
“(1) Any fishery management plan (or fishery management plan amendment) prepared by any Council or by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) or (b), or proposed regulations deemed necessary pursuant to subsection (c), shall include a fishery impact statement which shall assess, specify and analyze the likely effects and impact of the proposed action on the quality of the human environment.
“(2) The fishery impact statement shall describe—
“(A) a purpose of the proposed action;
“(B) the environmental impact of the proposed action;
“(C) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposed action be implemented;
“(D) a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed action;
“(E) the relationship between short-term use of fishery resources and the enhancement of long-term productivity;
“(F) the cumulative conservation and management effects; and
“(G) economic, and social impacts of the proposed action on—
“(i) participants in the fisheries and fishing communities affected by the proposed action;
“(ii) participants in the fisheries conducted in adjacent areas under the authority of another Council, after consultation with such Council and representatives of those participants; and
“(iii) the safety of human life at sea, including whether and to what extent such measures may affect the safety of participants in the fishery.
“(3) A substantially complete fishery impact statement, which may be in draft form, shall be available not less than 14 days before the beginning of the meeting at which a Council makes its final decision on the proposal (for plans, plan amendments, or proposed regulations prepared by a Council pursuant to subsection (a) or (c)). Availability of this fishery impact statement will be announced by the methods used by the council to disseminate public information and the public and relevant government agencies will be invited to comment on the fishery impact statement.
“(4) The completed fishery impact statement shall accompany the transmittal of a fishery management plan or plan amendment as specified in section 304(a), as well as the transmittal of proposed regulations as specified in section 304(b).
“(5) The Councils shall, subject to approval by the Secretary, establish criteria to determine actions or classes of action of minor significance regarding subparagraphs (A), (B), (D), (E), and (F) of paragraph (2), for which preparation of a fishery impact statement is unnecessary and categorically excluded from the requirements of this section, and the documentation required to establish the exclusion.
“(6) The Councils shall, subject to approval by the Secretary, prepare procedures for compliance with this section that provide for timely, clear, and concise analysis that is useful to decisionmakers and the public, reduce extraneous paperwork and effectively involve the public, including—
“(A) using Council meetings to determine the scope of issues to be addressed and identifying significant issues related to the proposed action;
“(B) integration of the fishery impact statement development process with preliminary and final Council decisionmaking in a manner that provides opportunity for comment from the public and relevant government agencies prior to these decision points; and
changed
“(C) providing scientific, technical, and legal advice at an early stage of the development of the fishery impact statement to ensure timely transmittal and Secretarial review of the proposed fishery management plan, plan amendment, or regulations to the Secretary.”Secretary.
added “(7) Actions taken in accordance with this section are deemed to fulfill the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and all related implementing regulations.”
“(D) evaluate the adequacy of the accompanying fishery impact statement as basis for fully considering the environmental impacts of implementing the fishery management plan or plan amendment.”
“(b) Review of regulations
“(1) Upon transmittal by the Council to the Secretary of proposed regulations prepared under section 303(c), the Secretary shall immediately initiate an evaluation of the proposed regulations to determine whether they are consistent with the fishery management plan, plan amendment, this Act and other applicable law. The Secretary shall also immediately initiate an evaluation of the accompanying fishery impact statement as a basis for fully considering the environmental impacts of implementing the proposed regulations. Within 15 days of initiating such evaluation the Secretary shall make a determination and—”
Sec. 15 Ensuring consistent management for fisheries throughout their range
“5. Ensuring consistent fisheries management under certain other Federal laws
“(a) National Marine Sanctuaries Act and Antiquities Act of 1906—In any case of a conflict between this Act and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.) or the Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.), this Act shall control.
“(b) Fisheries restrictions under Endangered Species Act of 1973—To ensure transparency and consistent management of fisheries throughout their range, any restriction on the management of fish in the exclusive economic zone that is necessary to implement a recovery plan under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) shall be implemented—
“(1) using authority under this Act; and
“(2) in accordance with processes and time schedules required under this Act.”
Sec. 18 Stock assessments used for fisheries managed under Gulf of Mexico Council’s Reef Fish Management Plan
“409. Stock assessments used for fisheries managed under Gulf of Mexico Council’s Reef Fish Management Plan
“(a) In general—The Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission shall conduct all fishery stock assessments used for management purposes by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council for the fisheries managed under the Council’s Reef Fish Management Plan.
“(b) Use of other information and assets
“(1) In general—Such fishery assessments shall—
“(A) incorporate fisheries survey information collected by university researchers; and
“(B) to the extent practicable, use State, university, and private assets to conduct fisheries surveys.
“(2) Surveys at artificial reefs—Any such fishery stock assessment conducted after the date of the enactment of the Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act shall incorporate fishery surveys conducted, and other relevant fisheries information collected, on and around natural and artificial reefs.
“(c) Constituent and stakeholder participation—Each such fishery assessment shall—
“(1) emphasize constituent and stakeholder participation in the development of the assessment;
“(2) contain all of the raw data used in the assessment and a description of the methods used to collect that data; and
“(3) employ an assessment process that is transparent and includes—
“(A) includes a rigorous and independent scientific review of the completed fishery stock assessment; and
“(B) a panel of independent experts to review the data and assessment and make recommendations on the most appropriate values of critical population and management quantities.”
Sec. 23 Subsistence fishing
“(43a)
“(A) The term “subsistence fishing” means fishing in which the fish harvested are intended for customary and traditional uses, including for direct personal or family consumption as food or clothing; for the making or selling of handicraft articles out of nonedible byproducts taken for personal or family consumption, for barter, or sharing for personal or family consumption; and for customary trade.
“(B) In this paragraph—
“(i) the term “family” means all persons related by blood, marriage, or adoption, or any person living within the household on a permanent basis; and
“(ii) the term “barter” means the exchange of a fish or fish part—
“(I) for another fish or fish part; or
“(II) for other food or for nonedible items other than money if the exchange is of a limited and noncommercial nature.”
Sec. 25 Arctic community development quota
changed
Section 4 313 (16 U.S.C. 1803) 1862) is amended—amended by adding at the end the following:
added “(k) Arctic community development quota—If the North Pacific Fishery Management Council issues a fishery management plan for the exclusive economic zone in the Arctic Ocean, or an amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Fish Resources of the Arctic Management Area issued by such Council, that makes available to commercial fishing, and establishes a sustainable harvest level, for any part of such zone, the Council shall set aside not less than 10 percent of the total allowable catch therein as a community development quota for coastal villages located north and east of the Bering Strait.”
Sec. 26 Preference for students studying water resource issues
addedadded Section 402(e) (16 U.S.C. 1881a(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
added “(4) The Secretary shall require that in the hiring of individuals to collect information regarding marine recreational fishing under this subsection, preference shall be given to individuals who are students studying water resource issues at an institution of higher education.”
Sec. 27 Process for allocation review for South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico mixed-use fisheries
addedSec. 28 Authorization of appropriations
addedadded Section 4 (16 U.S.C. 1803) is amended—