Expressing the sense of Congress opposing the President’s proposed Coastal Climate Resilience Program.

H. Con. Res. 136 · 114th Congress · Jun 10, 2016 · Lineage

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

That it is the sense of Congress that—

(1)

the Coastal Climate Resilience Program is not in the best interest of American families, businesses, local governments, wildlife, or public safety; and

(2)

Federal funds should not be made available for the Coastal Climate Resilience Fund, the Coastal Climate Resilience Program, or any substantially similar successor Federal program.

Lineage

Jun 10, 2016viewing Introduced in House Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Babin, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Harper, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Palazzo, and Mrs. Roby) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

Expressing the sense of Congress opposing the President’s proposed Coastal Climate Resilience Program.

Cite this provision

Incoming references