Section 1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the “Clean Water Affordability Act of 2014”.
Clean Water Affordability Act of 2014
A BILL
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to update a program to provide assistance for the planning, design, and construction of treatment works to intercept, transport, control, or treat municipal combined sewer overflows and sanitary sewer overflows, and to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to update certain guidance used to develop and determine the financial capability of communities to implement clean water infrastructure programs.
Sec. 2 Sewer overflow control grants
Section 221 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1301) is amended—
by striking subsections (a) through (g) and inserting the following:
“(a) Grants—The Administrator may—
“(1) make grants to States for the purpose of providing grants to local or regional authorities or a municipality or municipal entity for use in planning, designing, and constructing treatment works to intercept, transport, control, or treat municipal combined sewer overflows and sanitary sewer overflows; and
“(2) make a grant directly to a local or regional authority or municipality or municipal entity for the purposes described in paragraph (1).
“(b) Prioritization—In selecting from among municipalities applying for grants under this section, a State or the Administrator shall give priority to—
“(1) an applicant that is a financially distressed community, as determined by the applicable State under subsection (c); and
“(2) an applicant that discharges into a water body, or water body segment, impaired for nutrients or related pollutant indicators.
“(c) Determination—In determining whether a community is a distressed community for the purposes of subsection (b), a State shall consider, among other factors, the criteria described in section 7(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Water Affordability Act of 2014.
“(d) Cost-Sharing
“(1) Federal share—The Federal share of the cost of any project or activity carried out using funds from a grant made under subsection (a) shall be not less than 75 percent.
“(2) Non-Federal share—The non-Federal share of the cost of any project or activity carried out using funds from a grant made under subsection (a) may include—
“(A) in any amount, public and private funds and in-kind services; and
“(B) notwithstanding section 603, financial assistance, including loans, from a State water pollution control revolving fund.
“(e) Administrative requirements
“(1) In general—Subject to paragraph (2), a project that receives grant assistance under subsection (a) shall be carried out subject to the same requirements as a project that receives assistance from a State water pollution control revolving fund established pursuant to title VI.
“(2) Determination of Governor—The requirement described in paragraph (1) shall not apply to a project that receives grant assistance under subsection (a) to the extent that the Governor of the State in which the project is located determines that a requirement described in title VI is inconsistent with the purposes of this section.
“(f) Allocation of funds
“(1) Fiscal year 2015—For fiscal year 2015, subject to subsection (g), the Administrator shall use the amounts made available to carry out this section under subsection (i)(1) to provide grants to municipalities and municipal entities under subsection (a)(2) in accordance with the priority criteria described in subsection (b).
“(2) Fiscal year 2016 and thereafter—For fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter, subject to subsection (g), the Administrator shall use the amounts appropriated to carry out this section under subsection (i)(1) to provide grants to States under subsection (a)(1) in accordance with a formula that—
“(A) shall be established by the Administrator, after providing notice and an opportunity for public comment; and
“(B) allocates to each State a proportional share of the amounts based on the total needs of the State for municipal combined sewer overflow controls and sanitary sewer overflow controls, as identified in the most recent survey—
“(i) conducted under section 210; and
“(ii) included in a report required under section 516(a).”
by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively;
in the first sentence of subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph (2)), by striking “2003” and inserting “2015”; and
by adding at the end the following:
“(i) Funding
“(1) Authorization of appropriations—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section—
“(A) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2015;
“(B) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2016;
“(C) $350,000,000 for fiscal year 2017;
“(D) $400,000,000 for fiscal year 2018; and
“(E) $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2019.
“(2) Availability of amounts—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1) shall remain available until expended.”
Sec. 3 Integrated permitting process
In general— Section 402(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
“(6) Integrated Permits
“(A) Definition of publicly owned permittee—In this paragraph, the term publicly owned permittee means—
“(i) a treatment works (as defined in section 212) that is publicly owned; and
“(ii) a municipal separate storm sewer system referred to in this section.
“(B) Planning approach—The Administrator shall establish a comprehensive and integrated planning approach to the obligations under this section of a publicly owned permittee—
“(i) under which permit obligations may be implemented according to a schedule that—
“(I) accounts for the financial capability of the publicly owned permittee;
“(II) prioritizes permit obligations according to the most cost-effective and environmentally beneficial outcomes;
“(III) accounts for the preexisting maintenance, operational, and regulatory obligations of the publicly owned permittee under this section; and
“(IV) enables the publicly owned permittee to implement innovative approaches to meet those obligations; and
“(ii) that accounts for changed circumstances in the obligations of the publicly owned permittee, such as—
“(I) new innovative treatment approaches;
“(II) new regulatory requirements; and
“(III) changes in financial capability.”
Duration of permits— Section 402(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(b)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: “, except that a permit with a term of more than 5 years but not more than 25 years may be approved if the permittee has an approved integrated plan established under subsection (a)(6)”.
Sec. 4 Combined sewage overflow long-term control plan
Section 402(q) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(q)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(4) Combined sewage overflow long-term control plan
“(A) In general—The Administrator shall amend the CSO control policy to allow a publicly owned treatment work that has an approved long-term control plan to modify the plan to incorporate green infrastructure and energy-efficient technologies on a showing that the use of the technologies can cost-effectively help to meet the terms of the combined sewer overflow compliance obligations of the treatment work.
“(B) Compliance—The Administrator shall allow a publicly owned treatment work 30 years to meet compliance obligations under long-term control plans modified under this paragraph.”
Sec. 5 Environmental protection agency green infrastructure promotion
Title V of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) is amended—
by redesignating section 519 (33 U.S.C. 1251 note) as section 520; and
by inserting after section 518 (33 U.S.C. 1377) the following:
“519. Environmental protection agency green infrastructure promotion
“(a) In general—The Administrator shall ensure that the Office of Water, the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, the Office of Research and Development, and the Office of Policy of the Environmental Protection Agency promote the use of green infrastructure in and coordinate the integration of green infrastructure into, permitting programs, planning efforts, research, technical assistance, and funding guidance.
“(b) Duties—The Administrator shall ensure that the Office of Water—
“(1) promotes the use of green infrastructure in the programs of the Environmental Protection Agency; and
“(2) coordinates efforts to increase the use of green infrastructure with—
“(A) other Federal departments and agencies;
“(B) State, tribal, and local governments; and
“(C) the private sector.
“(c) Regional green infrastructure promotion—The Administrator shall direct each regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency, as appropriate based on local factors, to promote and integrate the use of green infrastructure within the region that includes—
“(1) a plan for monitoring, financing, mapping, and designing the green infrastructure;
“(2) outreach and training regarding green infrastructure implementation for State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, and the private sector; and
“(3) the incorporation of green infrastructure into permitting and other regulatory programs, codes, and ordinance development, including the requirements under consent decrees and settlement agreements in enforcement actions.
“(d) Green infrastructure information-Sharing—The Administrator shall promote green infrastructure information-sharing, including through an Internet website, to share information with, and provide technical assistance to, State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, the private sector, and the public regarding green infrastructure approaches for—
“(1) reducing water pollution;
“(2) protecting water resources;
“(3) complying with regulatory requirements; and
“(4) achieving other environmental, public health, and community goals.
“(e) Green infrastructure portfolio standard—The Administrator, in collaboration with State, tribal, and local water resource managers, shall establish voluntary measurable goals, to be known as the “green infrastructure portfolio standard”, to increase the percentage of annual water managed by eligible entities that use green infrastructure.”
Sec. 6 Updating of guidance
Definitions— In this section:
Administrator— The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Affordability— The term affordability means, with respect to payment of a utility bill, a measure of whether an individual customer or household can pay the bill without undue hardship or unreasonable sacrifice in the essential lifestyle or spending patterns of the individual or household, as determined by the Administrator.
Financial capability— The term financial capability means the financial capability of a community to make investments necessary to make water quality-related improvements, taking into consideration the criteria described in subsection (b)(2)(A).
Guidance— The term guidance means the guidance published by the Administrator entitled “Combined Sewer Overflows—Guidance for Financial Capability Assessment and Schedule Development” and dated February 1997, as applicable to combined sewer overflows and sanitary sewer overflows.
Updating—
In general— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update the guidance to ensure that the evaluations by the Administrator of financial capability assessment and schedule development meet the criteria described in paragraph (2).
Criteria— The criteria described in this paragraph are that, under the updated guidance—
in assessing financial capability of a community—
greater emphasis should be placed on local economic conditions;
for regional systems, consideration should be given to the economic conditions of political jurisdictions and significant demographic groups within each region;
prescriptive formulas for use in calculating financial capability and thresholds for expenditure should not be considered to be the only indicator of the financial capability of a community;
site-specific local conditions should be taken into consideration in analyzing financial capability;
a single measure of financial capability or affordability (such as median household income) should be viewed in the context of other economic measures, rather than as a threshold to be achieved; and
consideration should be given to the economic outlook of a community, including the potential impact of program requirements over time, in the development of implementation schedules; and
the assessment should take into consideration other essential community investments relating to water quality improvements;
with respect to the timing of implementation of water quality-related improvements—
environmental improvement implementation schedules should be structured to mitigate the potential adverse impact on distressed populations resulting from the costs of the improvements; and
implementation schedules should reflect local community financial conditions and economic impacts;
with respect to implementation of methodologies—
a determination of local financial capability may be achieved through an evaluation of an array of factors the relative importance of which may vary across regions and localities; and
an appropriate methodology should give consideration to such various factors as are appropriate to recognize the prevailing and projected economic concerns in a community; and
the residential indicator should be revised to include—
a consideration of costs imposed upon ratepayers for essential utilities;
increased consideration and quantification of local community-imposed costs in regional systems;
a mechanism to assess impacts on communities with disparate economic conditions throughout the entire service area of a utility;
a consideration of the industrial and population trends of a community;
recognition that—
the median household income of a service area reflects a numerical median rather than the distribution of incomes within the service area; and
more representative methods of determining affordability, such as shelter costs, essential utility payments, and State and local tax efforts, should be considered;
cash-flow forecasting rather than forecasting based on a snapshot evaluation of community financial capability;
a consideration of low-income ratepayer percentages; and
impacts relating to program delivery, such as water quality infrastructure market saturation and program management.
Implementation— The updated guidance should indicate that, in a case in which a previously approved long-term control plan or associated enforceable agreement allows for modification of the plan or terms of the agreement (including financial capability considerations), and all parties are in agreement that a change is needed or that the plan or agreement contains a reopener provision to address changes in the economic or financial status of the community since the effective date of the plan or agreement, reconsideration and modification of financial capability determinations and implementation schedules based on the criteria described in paragraph (2) are appropriate.
Publication and Submission— Upon completion of the updating of guidance under subsection (b), the Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register and submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives the updated guidance.
Authorization of Appropriations— There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.