Section 1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the “Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013”.
Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013
A BILL
To provide for identification of misaligned currency, require action to correct the misalignment, and for other purposes.
Sec. 2 Definitions
In this Act:
Administering authority— The term administering authority means the authority referred to in section 771(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(1)).
Agreement on government procurement— The term Agreement on Government Procurement means the agreement referred to in section 101(d)(17) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(17)).
Country— The term country means a foreign country, dependent territory, or possession of a foreign country, and may include an association of 2 or more foreign countries, dependent territories, or possessions of countries into a customs union outside the United States.
Exporting country— The term exporting country means the country in which the subject merchandise is produced or manufactured.
Fundamental misalignment— The term fundamental misalignment means a significant and sustained undervaluation of the prevailing real effective exchange rate, adjusted for cyclical and transitory factors, from its medium-term equilibrium level.
Fundamentally misaligned currency— The term fundamentally misaligned currency means a foreign currency that is in fundamental misalignment.
Real effective exchange rate— The term real effective exchange rate means a weighted average of bilateral exchange rates, expressed in price-adjusted terms.
Secretary— The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Treasury.
Sterilization— The term sterilization means domestic monetary operations taken to neutralize the monetary impact of increases in reserves associated with intervention in the currency exchange market.
Subject merchandise— The term subject merchandise means the merchandise subject to an antidumping investigation, review, suspension agreement, or order referred to in section 771(25) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(25)).
WTO agreement— The term WTO Agreement means the agreement referred to in section 2(9) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(9)).
Sec. 3 Report on international monetary policy and currency exchange rates
Reports required—
In general— Not later than March 15 and September 15 of each calendar year, the Secretary, after consulting with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy, shall submit to Congress and make public, a written report on international monetary policy and currency exchange rates.
Consultations— On or before March 30 and September 30 of each calendar year, the Secretary shall appear, if requested, before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives to provide testimony on the reports submitted pursuant to paragraph (1).
Content of reports— Each report submitted under subsection (a) shall contain the following:
An analysis of currency market developments and the relationship between the United States dollar and the currencies of major economies and trading partners of the United States.
A review of the economic and monetary policies of major economies and trading partners of the United States, and an evaluation of how such policies impact currency exchange rates.
A description of any currency intervention by the United States or other major economies or trading partners of the United States, or other actions undertaken to adjust the actual exchange rate relative to the United States dollar.
An evaluation of the domestic and global factors that underlie the conditions in the currency markets, including—
monetary and financial conditions;
accumulation of foreign assets;
macroeconomic trends;
trends in current and financial account balances;
the size, composition, and growth of international capital flows;
the impact of the external sector on economic growth;
the size and growth of external indebtedness;
trends in the net level of international investment; and
capital controls, trade, and exchange restrictions.
A list of currencies designated as fundamentally misaligned currencies pursuant to section 4(a)(2), and a description of any economic models or methodologies used to establish the list.
A list of currencies designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3).
An identification of the nominal value associated with the medium-term equilibrium exchange rate, relative to the United States dollar, for each currency listed under paragraph (6).
A description of any consultations conducted or other steps taken pursuant to section 5, 6, or 7, including any actions taken to eliminate the fundamental misalignment.
A description of any determination made pursuant to section 9(a).
Consultations—
In general— The Secretary shall consult with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy with respect to the preparation of each report required under subsection (a).
Comments— Not later than the date that is 15 days before the date each report is due under subsection (a), the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy shall submit to the Secretary any comments of the Chairman or Advisory Committee on the report.
Consideration— The Secretary shall review and consider all comments received from the Chairman and the Advisory Committee under paragraph (2) before submitting the report required under subsection (a).
Sec. 4 Identification of fundamentally misaligned currencies
Identification—
In general— The Secretary shall analyze on a semiannual basis the prevailing real effective exchange rates of foreign currencies.
Designation of fundamentally misaligned currencies— With respect to the currencies of countries that have significant bilateral trade flows with the United States, and currencies that are otherwise significant to the operation, stability, or orderly development of regional or global capital markets, the Secretary shall determine whether any such currency is in fundamental misalignment and shall designate such currency as a fundamentally misaligned currency.
Designation of currencies for priority action— The Secretary shall designate a currency identified under paragraph (2) for priority action if the country that issues such currency is—
engaging in protracted large-scale intervention in the currency exchange market, particularly if accompanied by partial or full sterilization;
engaging in excessive and prolonged official or quasi-official accumulation of foreign exchange reserves and other foreign assets, for balance of payments purposes;
introducing or substantially modifying for balance of payments purposes a restriction on, or incentive for, the inflow or outflow of capital, that is inconsistent with the goal of achieving full currency convertibility; or
pursuing any other policy or action that, in the view of the Secretary, warrants designation for priority action.
Reports— The Secretary shall include a list of any foreign currency designated under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a) and the data and reasoning underlying such designations in each report required by section 3.
Sec. 5 Negotiations and consultations
In general— Upon designation of a currency pursuant to section 4(a)(2), the Secretary shall seek to consult bilaterally with the country that issues such currency in order to facilitate the adoption of appropriate policies to address the fundamental misalignment.
Consultations involving currencies designated for priority action— With respect to each currency designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3), the Secretary shall, in addition to seeking to consult with a country pursuant to subsection (a)—
seek the advice of the International Monetary Fund with respect to the findings of the Secretary in the report submitted to Congress pursuant to section 3(a); and
encourage other governments, whether bilaterally or in appropriate multinational fora, to join the United States in seeking the adoption of appropriate policies by the country described in subsection (a) to eliminate the fundamental misalignment.
Sec. 6 Failure to adopt appropriate policies
Determination and measures required—
Determination— Not later than 90 days after the date on which a currency is designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3), the Secretary shall determine whether the country that issues the currency has adopted appropriate policies, and taken identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment.
Notification and publication— The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of the determination under paragraph (1) and publish notice of the determination in the Federal Register.
Measures— If the Secretary determines that the country that issues the currency described in paragraph (1) has failed to adopt appropriate policies, or take identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment, the measures specified in subsection (b) shall apply with respect to the country until a notification described in section 7(b) is published in the Federal Register.
Measures specified— The measures specified in this subsection are, with respect to a country, the following:
Adjustment under antidumping law— For purposes of an antidumping investigation under subtitle B of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673 et seq.) or a review under subtitle C of such Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 et seq.), the following shall apply:
In general— The administering authority shall ensure a fair comparison between the export price and the normal value by adjusting the price used to establish export price or constructed export price to reflect the fundamental misalignment of the currency of the country.
Sales subject to adjustment— The adjustment described in subparagraph (A) shall apply with respect to subject merchandise sold on or after the date that is 30 days after the date the currency of the country is designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3).
Federal procurement—
In general— The President shall prohibit the procurement by the Federal Government of products or services from the country.
Exception— The prohibition provided for in subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to a country that is a party to the Agreement on Government Procurement.
Request for IMF action— The United States shall inform the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund of the failure of the country to adopt appropriate policies, or to take identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment, and the actions the country is engaging in that are identified in section 4(a)(3), and shall request that the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund—
consult with the country regarding the observance of the obligations of the country under article IV of the International Monetary Fund Articles of Agreement, including through special consultations, if necessary; and
not later than 180 days after the date of the request, formally report the results of such consultations to the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund.
OPIC financing— The Overseas Private Investment Corporation shall not approve any new financing (including insurance, reinsurance, or guarantee) with respect to a project located within the country.
Multilateral bank financing—
In general— The Secretary shall instruct the United States Executive Director at each multilateral bank to oppose the approval of any new financing (including loans, other credits, insurance, reinsurance, or guarantee) to the government of the country or for a project located within the country.
Multilateral bank— The term multilateral bank includes each of the international financial institutions described in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262r).
Waiver—
In general— The President may waive any action provided for under subsection (a) or (b) if the President determines that—
taking the action would cause serious harm to the national security of the United States; or
it is in the vital economic interest of the United States to do so and taking the action would have an adverse impact on the United States economy greater than the benefits of the action.
Notification— The President shall promptly notify Congress of a determination under paragraph (1) (and the reasons for the determination, if made under paragraph (1)(B)) and shall publish notice of the determination (and the reasons for the determination, if made under paragraph (1)(B)) in the Federal Register.
Reports— The Secretary shall describe any action or determination pursuant to subsection (a), (b), or (c) in the first semiannual report required by section 3 after the date of the action or determination.
Sec. 7 Persistent failure to adopt appropriate policies
Determination and measures required—
Determination— Not later than 360 days after the date on which a currency is designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3), the Secretary shall determine whether the country that issues the currency has adopted appropriate policies, and taken identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment.
Notification and publication— The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of the determination under paragraph (1) and shall publish notice of the determination in the Federal Register.
Measures— If the Secretary determines that the country that issues the currency has failed to adopt appropriate policies, or take identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment, in addition to the measures specified in section 6(b), the following measures shall apply with respect to the country until a notification described in subsection (b) is published in the Federal Register:
Action at the WTO— The United States Trade Representative shall request consultations in the World Trade Organization with the country regarding the consistency of the actions of the country with its obligations under the WTO Agreement.
Remedial intervention—
In general— The Secretary shall consult with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to consider undertaking remedial intervention in international currency markets in response to the fundamental misalignment of the currency designated for priority action, and coordinating the intervention with other monetary authorities and the International Monetary Fund. In doing so, the Secretary shall consider the impact of the intervention on domestic economic growth and stability, including the impact on interest rates.
Notice to country— At the same time the Secretary takes action under clause (i), the Secretary shall notify the country that issues the currency of the consultations under clause (i).
Notification— The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress when a country that issues a currency designated for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3) adopts appropriate policies, or takes identifiable action, to eliminate the fundamental misalignment, and publish notice of the action of that country in the Federal Register.
Waiver—
In general— The President may waive any action provided for under this section, or extend any waiver provided for under section 6(c), if the President determines that—
taking the action would cause serious harm to the national security of the United States; or
it is in the vital economic interest of the United States to do so, and that taking the action would have an adverse impact on the United States economy substantially out of proportion to the benefits of the action.
Notification— The President shall promptly notify Congress of a determination under paragraph (1) (and the reasons for the determination, if made under paragraph (1)(B)) and shall publish notice of the determination (and the reasons for the determination, if made under paragraph (1)(B)) in the Federal Register.
Disapproval of waiver— If the President waives an action pursuant to subsection (c)(1)(B), or extends a waiver provided for under section 6(c)(1)(B), the waiver shall cease to have effect upon the enactment of a resolution of disapproval described in section 8(a)(2).
Reports— The Secretary shall describe any action or determination pursuant to subsection (a), (b), or (c) in the first semiannual report required by section 3 after the date of such action or determination.
Sec. 8 Congressional disapproval of waiver
Resolution of Disapproval—
Introduction— If a resolution of disapproval is introduced in the House of Representatives or the Senate during the 90-day period (not counting any day which is excluded under section 154(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2194(b)(1))), beginning on the date on which the President first notifies Congress of a determination to waive action with respect to a country pursuant to section 7(c)(1)(B), that resolution of disapproval shall be considered in accordance with this subsection.
Resolution of disapproval— In this subsection, the term resolution of disapproval means only a joint resolution of the two Houses of the Congress, the sole matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That Congress does not approve the determination of the President under ___________ of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013 with respect to ______, of which Congress was notified on _____.”, with the first blank space being filled section 7(c)(1)(B) or section 6(c)(1)(B), whichever is applicable, the second blank space being filled with the name of the appropriate country, and the third blank space being filled with the appropriate date.
Procedures for considering resolutions—
Introduction and referral— Resolutions of disapproval—
in the House of Representatives—
may be introduced by any Member of the House of Representatives;
shall be referred to the Committee on Financial Services and to the Committee on Rules; and
may not be amended by either Committee; and
in the Senate—
may be introduced by any Member of the Senate;
shall be referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; and
may not be amended.
Committee discharge and floor consideration— The provisions of subsections (c) through (f) of section 152 of the Trade Act of 1974 (other than paragraph (3) of subsection (f)) (19 U.S.C. 2192 (c) through (f)) (relating to committee discharge and floor consideration of certain resolutions in the House and Senate) apply to a resolution of disapproval under this section to the same extent those subsections apply to joint resolutions under such section 152.
Rules of House of Representatives and Senate— This section is enacted by Congress—
as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the House of Representatives and the Senate, respectively, and as such is deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, and the rules provided for in this section supersede other rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent with those other rules; and
with the full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules provided for in this section (so far as relating to the procedures of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as any other rule of that House.
Sec. 9 International financial institution governance arrangements
Initial review—
In general— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, before the United States approves a proposed change in the governance arrangement of any international financial institution, as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262r(c)(2)), the Secretary shall determine whether any member of the international financial institution that would benefit from the proposed change, in the form of increased voting shares or representation, has a currency that was designated a currency for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3) in the most recent report required by section 3.
Report— The Secretary shall submit to Congress the determination required by paragraph (1).
Subsequent action— The United States shall oppose any proposed change in the governance arrangement of the international financial institution if the Secretary renders an affirmative determination pursuant to subsection (a).
Further action— The United States shall continue to oppose any proposed change in the governance arrangement of the international financial institution, pursuant to subsection (b), until the Secretary determines and reports to Congress that the proposed change would not benefit any member of the international financial institution, in the form of increased voting shares or representation, that has a currency that is designated a currency for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3).
Sec. 10 Adjustment for fundamentally misaligned currency designated for priority action
In general— Subsection (c)(2) of section 772 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677a(c)(2)) is amended—
in subparagraph (A), by striking “and” at the end;
in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “, and”; and
by adding at the end the following:
“(C) if required by section 6(b)(1) of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013, the percentage by which the domestic currency of the producer or exporter is undervalued in relation to the United States dollar as determined under section 771(37).”
Calculation methodology— Section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(37) Percentage undervaluation—The administering authority shall determine the percentage by which the domestic currency of the producer or exporter is undervalued in relation to the United States dollar by comparing the nominal value associated with the medium-term equilibrium exchange rate of the domestic currency of the producer or exporter, identified by the Secretary pursuant to section 3(b)(7) of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013, to the official daily exchange rate identified by the administering authority.”
Sec. 11 Currency undervaluation under countervailing duty law
Investigation or review— Subsection (c) of section 702 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671a(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(6) Currency undervaluation—For purposes of a countervailing duty investigation under this subtitle where the determinations under clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) are affirmative, or a review under subtitle C of this title, the following shall apply:
“(A) In general—The administering authority shall initiate an investigation to determine whether currency undervaluation by the government of a country or any public entity within the territory of a country is providing, directly or indirectly, a countervailable subsidy as described in section 771(5), if—
“(i) a petition filed by an interested party (described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 771(9)) alleges the elements necessary for the imposition of the duty imposed by section 701(a); and
“(ii) the petition is accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting those allegations.
“(B) Designation of fundamentally misaligned currency for priority action—Upon designation of a currency as a fundamentally misaligned currency for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3) of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013, the administering authority shall initiate an investigation to determine whether the country that issues such currency is providing, directly or indirectly, a countervailable subsidy as defined in section 771(5), if—
“(i) a petition filed by an interested party (described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 771(9)) alleges the elements necessary for the imposition of the duty imposed by section 701(a); and
“(ii) the petition is accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting those allegations.”
Benefit calculation methodology— Section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677), as amended by section 10(b), is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(38) Currency undervaluation benefit—For purposes of a countervailing duty investigation under subtitle A of this title, or a review under subtitle C of this title, the following shall apply:
“(A) In general—If the administering authority determines to investigate whether currency undervaluation is a countervailable subsidy as defined in section 771(5), the administering authority shall determine whether there is a benefit to the recipient and measure such benefit by comparing the simple average of the real exchange rates derived from application of the macroeconomic-balance approach and the equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach to the official daily exchange rate identified by the administering authority.
“(B) Reliance on data—In making the determination under subparagraph (A), the administering authority shall rely upon data that are publicly available, reliable, and compiled and maintained by the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank, or other international organizations or national governments if data from the International Monetary Fund or World Bank are not available.
“(C) Designation of fundamentally misaligned currency for priority action—In the case of designation of a currency as a fundamentally misaligned currency for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3) of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013, the administering authority shall determine whether there is a benefit to the recipient and measure that benefit by comparing the nominal value associated with the medium-term equilibrium exchange rate of the currency of the exporting country, identified by the Secretary pursuant to section 3(b)(7) of such Act, to the official daily exchange rate identified by the administering authority.
“(D) Definitions—In this paragraph:
“(i) Macroeconomic-balance approach—The term macroeconomic-balance approach means a methodology under which the level of undervaluation of the real effective exchange rate of the currency of the exporting country is defined as the change in the real effective exchange rate needed to achieve equilibrium in the balance of payments of the exporting country, as such methodology is described in the guidelines of the International Monetary Fund’s Consultative Group on Exchange Rate Issues, if available.
“(ii) Equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach—The term equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach means a methodology under which the level of undervaluation of the real effective exchange rate of the currency of the exporting country is defined as the difference between the observed real effective exchange rate and the real effective exchange rate, as such methodology is described in the guidelines of the International Monetary Fund’s Consultative Group on Exchange Rate Issues, if available.
“(iii) Real exchange rates—The term real exchange rates means the bilateral exchange rates derived from converting the trade-weighted multilateral exchange rates yielded by the macroeconomic-balance approach and the equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach into real bilateral terms.”
Export subsidy— Section 771(5A)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(5A)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The fact that a subsidy may also be provided in circumstances that do not involve export shall not, for that reason alone, mean that the subsidy cannot be considered contingent upon export performance.”.
Effective date— The amendments made by this section apply to countervailing duty investigations initiated under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.) and reviews initiated under subtitle C of title VII of such Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 et seq.)—
before the date of the enactment of this Act, if the investigation or review is pending a final determination as of such date of enactment; and
on or after such date of enactment.
Sec. 12 Nonmarket economy status
Paragraph (18)(B) of section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18)(B)) is amended—
in clause (v), by striking “and” at the end;
by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (vii); and
by inserting after clause (v) the following:
“(vi) whether the currency of the foreign country is designated, or has been designated at any time over the 5 years prior to review of nonmarket economy status, a currency for priority action pursuant to section 4(a)(3) of the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2013, and”
Sec. 13 Application to Canada and Mexico
Pursuant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and section 408 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3438), section 6(b)(1) and the amendments made by sections 10, 11, and 12 shall apply with respect to goods from Canada and Mexico.
Sec. 14 Advisory committee on international exchange rate policy
Establishment—
In general— There is established an Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy (in this section referred to as the Committee) that shall be responsible for—
advising the Secretary in the preparation of each report to Congress on international monetary policy and currency exchange rates, provided for in section 3; and
advising Congress and the President with respect to—
international exchange rates and financial policies; and
the impact of such policies on the economy of the United States.
Membership—
In general— The Committee shall be composed of 9 members as follows, none of whom shall be employees of the Federal Government:
Congressional appointees—
Senate appointees— Four members shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, upon the recommendation of the chairmen and ranking members of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.
House appointees— Four members shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives upon the recommendation of the chairmen and ranking members of the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives.
Presidential appointee— One member shall be appointed by the President.
Qualifications— Members shall be selected under subparagraph (A) on the basis of their objectivity and demonstrated expertise in finance, economics, or currency exchange.
Terms—
In general— Members shall be appointed for a term of 4 years or until the Committee terminates.
Reappointment— An individual may be reappointed to the Committee for additional terms.
Vacancies— Any vacancy in the Committee shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
Duration of committee—
In general— Notwithstanding section 14(c) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the Committee shall terminate on the date that is 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act unless renewed by the President pursuant to section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) for a subsequent 4-year period.
Subsequent renewals— The President may continue to renew the Committee for successive 4-year periods by taking appropriate action prior to the date on which the Committee would otherwise terminate.
Public meetings—
Public comments— The Committee shall hold at least 2 public meetings each year for the purpose of accepting public comments, including comments from small business owners.
Call of Secretary or members— The Committee shall also meet as needed at the call of the Secretary or at the call of two-thirds of the members of the Committee.
Chairperson—
Election— The Committee shall elect from among its members a chairperson for a term of 4 years or until the Committee terminates.
Subsequent terms— A chairperson of the Committee may be reelected chairperson but is ineligible to serve consecutive terms as chairperson.
Staff— The Secretary shall make available to the Committee such staff, information, personnel, administrative services, and assistance as the Committee may reasonably require to carry out its activities.
Application of Federal advisory committee Act—
In general— The provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the Committee.
Exception— Except for the 2 annual public meetings required under subsection (c)(1), meetings of the Committee shall be exempt from the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of sections 10 and 11 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (relating to open meetings, public notice, public participation, and public availability of documents) (5 U.S.C. App.), whenever and to the extent it is determined by the President or the Secretary that such meetings will be concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously compromise the development by the United States Government of monetary and financial policy.
Sec. 15 Repeal of the Exchange Rates and Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988
The Exchange Rates and International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is repealed.