Congress finds as follows:
(1)
Civil asset forfeiture is the seizure of private property by the government without due process of law. Law enforcement officers routinely seize money, financial assets and possessions simply by asserting their intuition or belief that the assets or property are connected to some (often unspecified) illegal activity.
(2)
The burden of proof in asset forfeiture proceedings is placed entirely on the owner to prove his innocence, instead of the government to prove guilt.
(3)
Seized property is often not returned, even if the owner is never convicted of a crime. Property is often seized without even charging owners with a crime.
(4)
Many people cannot afford to fight in court to restore rightful ownership of their property.
(5)
Instead of returning property to its rightful owners, police and agencies often retain seized property for their own use, or sell seized property and keep the income, creating a vested incentive to seize property for salaries, vehicles, and perks, giving rise to the euphemism, “policing for profit”.
(6)
Courts of justice are the proper and legal venue to determine if property is stolen or used in the commission of a crime, not individual police officers or public officials. Stolen property should always be returned to its lawful owners, and not become the property of police departments.
(7)
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “No person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.
(8)
The abolition of civil asset forfeiture restores the Fifth Amendment right to not be deprived of property without due process of law.