Strengthening Healthcare Options for Vulnerable Populations Act
A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide improvements for Medicare Advantage special needs plans, and for other purposes.
2. Reauthorization of certain Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans
“(F) Not later than December 31, 2018, the plan is fully integrated with capitated contracts with States for any Medicaid benefits, including long-term care and behavioral health, to the extent State law permits capitation of such services under such plan.”
“(vi) Defined role of State Medicaid agencies with respect to fully integrated dual special needs plans—The Secretary, in coordination with State Medicaid Directors, shall develop a clearly defined role for State Medicaid agencies in contracting and oversight of plans described in clause (v)(II).”
3. Improvements to Medicare Advantage 5–Star Quality Rating System for plans with predominately Dual Eligible enrollees
“(6) Treatment of plans with disproportionately high dual eligible enrollees
“(A) In general—In implementing this subsection, the Secretary shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that the quality rating for a plan—
“(i) does not disadvantage such a plan that enrolls—
“(I) full-benefit dual eligible individual (as defined in section 1935(c)(6));
“(II) qualified Medicare beneficiaries (as defined in section 1905(p)(1)); or
“(III) individuals with complex health care needs, such as individuals with multiple conditions or individuals who require chronic care or institutional care; and
“(ii) accounts for differences in socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of enrollees of such a plan that result in significant variation in health outcomes.
“(B) Specific steps—The steps described in subparagraph (A) shall include at least the following:
“(i) Comparing specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6)) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section only against other plans with the same types of enrollment.
“(ii) Developing a methodology specific to specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6)) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section for determining a quality rating under this subsection for such plans.
“(iii) Developing appropriate case mix adjustment to Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) and Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) measures for specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6)) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section that account for factors beyond the control of the health system, such as the management of conditions.
“(iv) Identifying and implementing those quality measures that are appropriate for evaluating the performance of specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6)) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section.
“(v) Eliminating duplicative or substantially similar measures applied under this title or title XIX with respect to specialized MA plans.”
“(7) Temporary treatment of certain dual special needs plans—In implementing this subsection during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this paragraph and ending one year after the date on which the Secretary has taken such steps as are required under paragraph (6), the Secretary may increase the quality rating that a specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6)) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section would otherwise receive under this subsection for a year by 0.5 stars if the plan demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the quality rating the plan would have otherwise received is predominately attributable to socio-economic, demographic, or pre-existing complex health care needs of the population enrolled in such plan with respect to such year instead of the performance of the plan with respect to such year.”
4. Additional improvements to the oversight and operation of Medicare Advantage Dual Special Needs Plans by the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office
“(6) Serving as the dedicated point of contact within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to assist States with ongoing issues related to the administration of specialized MA plans for special needs individuals (as defined in section 1859(b)(6) of the Social Security Act) for special needs individuals who are described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section, including—
“(A) addressing any misalignment between the contracting timelines, processes, and deadlines under title XVIII of such Act, with respect to such plans for such individuals and contracting timelines, processes, and deadlines under title XIX of such Act, with respect to such plans and individuals; and
“(B) streamlining the flow of information to dual eligible individuals and establishing a single set of rules for outreach and marketing to such individuals.”
5. Improvements to dispute resolution for claims and appeals under Medicare Advantage Dual Special Needs Plans
“(G) For plan years beginning after December 31, 2015, coverage under this title and title XIX of an individual enrolled under such respective title shall continue during any determination, reconsideration, or appeals proceeding described in section 1852(g), with respect to such individual.”
6. Report on implementation of certain Medicare and Medicaid fraud detection and program integrity provisions
“(iii) Report on integrated data repository and one program integrity system—Not later than six months after the date of enactment of this clause, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate Congressional committees a report on the following:
“(I) Integrated data repository—Efforts to finalize plans and schedules for fully implementing and expanding the use of the Integrated Data Repository, including actions taken to finalize, implement, and manage plans for incorporating data into the Integrated Data Repository and actions taken to define measurable financial benefits expected from the implementation of the Integrated Data Repository.
“(II) One program integrity system—Actions taken to plan, schedule, and conduct training on the One Program Integrity System, a Web-based portal and suite of software tools used to analyze and extract data from the Integrated Data Repository, and actions taken to define measurable financial benefits expected from the use of the One Program Integrity System.”