US Codex
Bill
Notes

H.R. 4435 — what changed

Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015

From Reported in House to Engrossed in House. 40 sections amended and 174 added between Reported in House and Engrossed in House.

Sec. 2 Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents

(a)
changed Divisions— This Act is organized into four five divisions as follows:
(1)
Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2)
Division B—Military Construction Authorizations.
(3)
Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
(4)
Division D—Funding Tables.
(5)
added Division E—Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform.
(b)
Table of contents— The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Sec. 142 Sense of Congress regarding the OCONUS basing of the F–35A

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The Department of Defense has begun its process of permanently stationing the F–35 at installations in the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “CONUS”) and forward-basing Outside the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “OCONUS”).
(2)
added The Secretary of the Air Force is assessing operating bases for the F–35A to support Pacific Air Forces, which includes two United States candidate bases in Alaska and three foreign OCONUS candidate bases.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the Sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force, in the strategic basing process for the F–35A, should place emphasis on the benefits derived from sites that—
(1)
added are capable of hosting fighter-based bilateral and multilateral training opportunities with international partners;
(2)
added have sufficient airspace and range capabilities and capacity to meet the training requirements;
(3)
added have existing facilities to support personnel, operations, and logistics associated with the flying mission;
(4)
added have limited encroachment that would adversely impact training or operations; and
(5)
added minimize the overall construction and operational costs.

Sec. 302 Increase in funding for Civil Military Programs

added
(a)
added Funding— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for Civil Military Programs, is hereby increased by $55,000,000.
(b)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense is hereby reduced by $55,000,000.

Sec. 318 Off-installation Department of Defense natural resources projects compliance with integrated natural resource management plans

added

added Section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(d) Compliance with integrated natural resource management plan—In the case of a cooperative agreement or interagency agreement under subsection (a) for the maintenance and improvement of natural resources located off of a military installation or State-owned National Guard installation, funds referred to in subsection (b) may be used only pursuant to an approved integrated natural resources management plan.”

Sec. 319 Recommendation on Air Force energy conservation measures

added

added Congress recommends that the Secretary of the Air Force take action on identified energy conservation measures in a comprehensive and timely manner using an array of available funding mechanisms.

Sec. 320 Environmental restoration at former Naval Air Station, Chincoteague, Virginia

added
(a)
added Environmental restoration project— Notwithstanding the administrative jurisdiction of the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration over the Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, the Secretary of Defense may undertake an environmental restoration project in a manner consistent with chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, at the property constituting that facility in order to provide necessary response actions for contamination from a release of a hazardous substance or a pollutant or contaminant that is attributable to the activities of the Department of Defense at the time the property was under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy or used by the Navy pursuant to a permit or license issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the area formerly known as the Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia. Any such project may be undertaken jointly or in conjunction with an environmental restoration project of the Administrator.
(b)
added Interagency agreement— The Secretary and the Administrator may enter into an agreement or agreements to provide for the effective and efficient performance of environmental restoration projects for purposes of subsection (a). Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, any such agreement may provide for environmental restoration projects conducted jointly or by one agency on behalf of the other or both agencies and for reimbursement of the agency conducting the project by the other agency for that portion of the project for which the reimbursing agency has authority to respond.
(c)
added Source of department of defense funds— Pursuant to section 2703(c) of title 10, United States Code , the Secretary may use funds available in the Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, account of the Department of Defense for environmental restoration projects conducted for or by the Secretary under subsection (a) and for reimbursable agreements entered into under subsection (b).

Sec. 320A Prohibition on use of funds to implement certain climate change assessments and reports

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to implement the United States Global Change Research Program National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report, the United Nation’s Agenda 21 sustainable development plan, or the May 2013 Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order No. 12866.

Sec. 334 Report on impacts of funding reductions on military readiness

(a)
Report required— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall report to the congressional defense committees on the readiness and cost impacts, both immediate and long-term, for the military services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Defense Agencies, of the reductions in funding required in section 4301 of this Act. Such report shall address each of the following categories:
(1)
Reduction in contracts for Other Services, including—
(A)
changed impacts on mission execution and effectivenesseffectiveness;
(B)
subsistence and support of persons, including submarine galley maintenance in support of the Navy fleets;
(C)
the credentialing of health, legal, engineering, and acquisition professionals, including licenses, certifications, and national board examinations;
(D)
continuing education for military service members and their families, including tuition assistance and completion of graduate degrees, including correspondence courses;
(E)
scholarships, instructor pay, and textbooks for Reserve Officer Training Corps and Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps programs;
(F)
installation family support programs;
(G)
general training, including training outside normal occupational specialties such as cultural and language training for deploying forces;
(H)
physical fitness services;
(I)
the annual audit of financial records and annual review of acquisition programs;
(J)
drivers for security details;
(K)
foreign national indirect hires;
(L)
port visit costs and port visit security;
(M)
Defense Travel System afloat support;
(N)
engineering readiness assessment teams;
(O)
sexual assault and suicide prevention and response programs;
(P)
student meal programs and educational assistance purchases;
(Q)
employer support to the National Guard and Reserve;
(R)
Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program; and
(S)
network programming activities, database sustainment, and improvement.
(2)
Reductions in contracts for facility sustainment, restoration, and modernization, including—
(A)
impacts to mission execution and effectiveness;
(B)
impacts to life, health and safety, including fire and emergency services;
(C)
impacts to training;
(D)
deferrals of repairs or upgrades to mission-critical infrastructure, including roads, electrical systems, heating and air conditioning systems, and buildings;
(E)
deferrals of repairs or upgrades to airfield runways, taxiways and aprons;
(F)
installation security through the deferrals of repairs, replacements or reconfigurations of gates or other installation security components;
(G)
base operations due to deferral of facility renovations, consolidations, conversions, or demolitions;
(H)
operation of dining facilities;
(I)
utility privatization;
(J)
deferrals of repair and renovation of barracks;
(K)
facilities engineering services;
(L)
dredging of navigation channels;
(M)
execution of the minimum six percent capital investment program required under section 2476 of title 10, United States Code; and
(N)
maintenance, repairs, and modernization of Department of Defense dependent schools in Europe and the Pacific and defense domestic dependent elementary schools.
(3)
Reductions in civilian personnel, including—
(A)
mission execution and effectiveness;
(B)
the ability to recruit, hire, and train civilian employees;
(C)
the cost of overtime that will be generated as a result of unfilled civilian personnel billets;
(D)
the morale of the civilian workforce; and
(E)
the ability to execute reductions in force within the fiscal year.
(4)
changed Reductions in unobligated balances of prior-year funding, including:including—
(A)
mission execution and effectiveness; and
(B)
the ability to execute reductions within the fiscal year.
(5)
Any other information that the Under Secretary determines is relevant to enhancing the committees’ understanding of the impacts of the required reductions in funding.
(b)
Form of report— The Comptroller General may report to the congressional defense committees, as required by subsection (a), either by providing a briefing or a written report.

Sec. 342 Limitation on furlough of certain working-capital fund employees

added

added Section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(s) The Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as appropriate, may not carry out a non-disciplinary furlough (as defined in section 7511(a)(5) of title 5) of a civilian employee of the Department of Defense whose performance is charged to a working-capital fund unless the Secretary—

added “(1) determines that failure to furlough the employee will result in a violation of subsection (f); and

added “(2) submits to Congress, by not later than 45 days before initiating a furlough, notice of the furlough that includes a certification that, as a result of the proposed furlough, none of the work performed by any employee of the Government will be shifted to any Department of Defense civilian employee, contractor, or member of the Armed Forces.”

Sec. 354 Agreements with local civic organizations to support conducting a military air show or open house

added
(a)
added Agreements authorized— Chapter 155 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “2616. Military air show or open house: agreements with local civic organization; authority to charge nominal admission fee

added “(a) Agreements authorized—The Secretary concerned may enter into a contract or agreement with a non-Federal civic organization to conduct or support an air show or open house to feature any unit, aircraft, vessel, equipment, or members of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary.

added “(b) Nominal fees authorized—The Secretary concerned may charge, or authorize a civic organization with which the Secretary has entered into a contract or agreement under subsection (a) to charge, the public a nominal admission fee (to be determined by the Secretary) to attend a military air show or open house.

added “(c) Treatment of fees—Amounts collected as admission fees under subsection (b) for an air show or open house may be retained to cover costs associated with the air show or open house, including costs associated with parking for the air show or open house or the provision of temporary shuttle-bus service for air show or open house visitors. If costs are incurred and covered in advance of the collection of the fees, amounts collected shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. Any amounts so credited under this subsection shall be subject to the Appropriations process of the United States Congress.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 355 Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units

added

added Section 974(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The Secretary concerned may” and inserting “The Secretary concerned shall”.

Sec. 507 Deferred retirement of chaplains

added

added Section 1253 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c) Deferred Retirement of Chaplains

added “(1) The Secretary of the military department concerned may, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), defer the retirement under subsection (a) of an officer who is appointed or designated as a chaplain if the Secretary determines that such deferral is in the best interest of the military department concerned.

added “(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), a deferment under this subsection may not extend beyond the first day of the month following the month in which the officer becomes 68 years of age.

added “(3) The Secretary of the military department concerned may extend a deferment under this subsection beyond the day referred to in paragraph (2) if the Secretary determines that extension of the deferment is necessary for the needs of the military department concerned. Such an extension shall be made on a case-by-case basis and shall be for such period as the Secretary considers appropriate.”

Sec. 508 Compliance with efficiencies directive

added

added By not later than December 31, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the number of flag officers and generals are reduced to comply with the Department of Defense efficiencies directive dated March 14, 2011.

Sec. 514 Electronic tracking of certain reserve duty

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty service performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such title.

Sec. 515 National Guard Cyber Protection Teams

added
(a)
added Progress report— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress made by the Army National Guard to establish 10 Cyber Protection Teams composed of members of the National Guard to perform duties relating to analysis and protection in support of programs to prepare for and respond to emergencies involving an attack or natural disaster impacting a computer, electronic, or cyber network.
(b)
added Elements— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added A timeframe of when stationing of the Cyber Protection Teams will be finalized.
(2)
added A timeframe of activation of the Cyber Protection Teams and whether the teams will be activated at the same time or staggered over time.
(3)
added A description of what manning and basing requirements have been established.
(4)
added The number and location of nominations received for a Cyber Protection Team and the activation date estimate provided in each nomination.
(5)
added An assessment of the range of stated cost projections included in the nominations.
(6)
added An assessment of any identified patterns regarding ease or difficulty of staffing individuals with required credentials within particular regions.
(7)
added Any additional information deemed relevant by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(c)
added Form of report— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

Sec. 528 Revised regulations for religious freedom

added
(a)
added Revision of Department of Defense Instruction 1300.17—
(1)
added Revision required— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a revised instruction to replace Department of Defense Instruction 1300.17.
(2)
added Purpose— The revision of Department of Defense Instruction 1300.17 shall address the Congressional intent and content of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note), as amended by section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 759), to ensure that verbal and written expressions of an individual’s religious beliefs are protected by the Department of Defense as an essential part of a the free exercise of religion by a member of the Armed Forces.
(b)
added Revision of Air Force Instruction 1–1—
(1)
added Revision required— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall issue a revised instruction to replace Air Force Instruction 1–1.
(2)
added Purpose— The revision of Air Force Instruction 1–1 shall reflect the protections for religious expressions contained in—
(A)
added section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note), as amended by section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 759); and
(B)
added the revised Department of Defense instruction referenced in subsection (a) if revision of that instruction is completed before the revision of Air Force Instruction 1–1.
(3)
added Termination— If, before the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force issues a revised instruction to replace Air Force Instruction 1–1 and such revision is consistent with the purpose specified in paragraph (2), the requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall no longer apply.

Sec. 529 Enhancement of participation of mental health professionals in boards for correction of military records and boards for review of discharge or dismissal of members of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Boards for correction of military records— Section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g):

added “(g) Any medical advisory opinion issued to a board established under subsection (a)(1) with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder shall include the opinion of a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist if the request for correction of records concerned relates to a mental health disorder.”

(b)
added Boards for review of discharge or dismissal—
(1)
added Review for certain former members with PTSD or TBI— Subsection (d)(1) of section 1553 of such title is amended by striking “physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist” the second place it appears and inserting “clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with training on mental health issues connected with post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury (as applicable)”.
(2)
added Review for certain former members with mental health diagnoses— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) In the case of a former member of the armed forces (other than a former member covered by subsection (d)) who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder, a board established under this section to review the former member's discharge or dismissal shall include a member who is a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with special training on mental health disorders.”

Sec. 530 Preliminary mental health assessments

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 31 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “520d. Preliminary mental health assessments

added “(a) Provision of mental health assessment—Before any individual enlists in an armed force or is commissioned as an officer in an armed force, the Secretary concerned shall provide the individual with a mental health assessment. The Secretary shall use such results as a baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations, including such examinations provided under sections 1074f and 1074m of this title.

added “(b) Use of assessment—The Secretary may not consider the results of a mental health assessment conducted under subsection (a) in determining the assignment or promotion of a member of the Armed Forces.

added “(c) Application of privacy laws—With respect to applicable laws and regulations relating to the privacy of information, the Secretary shall treat a mental health assessment conducted under subsection (a) in the same manner as the medical records of a member of the armed forces.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 520c the following new item:
(c)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health shall submit to Congress and the Secretary of Defense a report on preliminary mental health assessments of members of the Armed Forces.
(2)
added Matters included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added Recommendations with respect to establishing a preliminary mental health assessment of members of the Armed Forces to bring mental health screenings to parity with physical screenings of members.
(B)
added Recommendations with respect to the composition of the mental health assessment, best practices, and how to track assessment changes relating to traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other conditions.
(3)
added Coordination— The National Institute of Mental Health shall carry out paragraph (1) in coordination with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the surgeons general of the military departments, and other relevant experts.

Sec. 530A Availability of additional leave for members of the Armed Forces in connection with the birth of a child

added

added Section 701(j) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively;
(2)
added by inserting after “(j)” the following new paragraph (1):

added “(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a member of the armed forces who gives birth to a child shall receive 42 days of convalescent leave to be used in connection with the birth of the child. At the discretion of the member, the member shall be allowed up to 42 additional days in a leave of absence status in connection with the birth of the child upon the expiration of the convalescent leave, except that—

added “(A) a member who uses this additional leave is not entitled to basic pay for any day on which such additional leave is used, but shall be considered to be on active duty for all other purposes; and

added “(B) the commanding officer of the member may recall the member to duty from such leave of absence status when necessary to maintain unit readiness.”

(3)
added in paragraph (3), as redesignated, by striking “paragraph (1)” and inserting “paragraphs (1) and (2)”.

Sec. 540 Revision to requirements relating to Department of Defense policy on retention of evidence in a sexual assault case to allow return of personal property upon completion of related proceedings

added

added Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1435; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Return of personal property upon completion of related proceedings—Notwithstanding subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evidence in connection with an incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces may be returned to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion of all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings related to such incident.”

Sec. 540A Establishment of phone service for prompt reporting of hazing involving a member of the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Establishment required— The Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code) shall develop and implement a phone service through which an individual can anonymously call to report incidents of hazing in that branch of the Armed Forces.
(b)
added Hazing described— For purposes of carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard operates) shall use the definition of hazing contained in the August 28, 1997, Secretary of Defense Policy Memorandum, which defined hazing as any conduct whereby a member of the Armed Forces, regardless of branch or rank, without proper authority causes another member to suffer, or be exposed to, any activity which is cruel, abusive, humiliating, oppressive, demeaning, or harmful. Soliciting or coercing another person to perpetrate any such activity is also considered hazing. Hazing need not involve physical contact among or between members of the Armed Forces. Hazing can be verbal or psychological in nature. Actual or implied consent to acts of hazing does not eliminate the culpability of the perpetrator.

Sec. 548 Role of military spouse employment programs in addressing unemployment and underemployment of spouses of members of the Armed Forces and closing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added Members of the Armed Forces and their families make enormous sacrifices in defense of the United States.
(2)
added Military spouses face a unique lifestyle marked by frequent moves, increased family responsibility during deployments, and limited career opportunities in certain geographic locations.
(3)
added These circumstances present significant challenges to military spouses who desire to build a portable career commensurate with their skills, including education and experience.
(4)
added According to a recent Department of Defense survey, the unemployment rate for civilians married to a military member is 25 percent, but the unemployment rate is 33 percent for spouses of junior enlisted members. The same survey revealed that 85 percent of military spouses want or need to work.
(5)
added A recent Military Officers Association of American (MOAA)/Institute for Veterans and Military Families’ (IVMF) Military Spouse Employment Report revealed that an overwhelming ninety percent of female military spouses are underemployed.
(6)
added The Department of Defense has demonstrated its commitment to helping military spouses obtain employment by creating the Military Spouse Employment Partnership (MSEP), the Military Spouse Career Center, and the Military Spouse Career Advancement Accounts (MyCAA). More than 61,000 military spouses have been hired as part of the Military Spouse Employment Partnership (MSEP) since the MSEP launch in June 2011.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense should continue to work to reduce the unemployment and underemployment of spouses of members of the Armed Forces (in this section referred to as “military spouses”) and support closing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts;
(2)
added in this process, the Secretary should prioritize efforts that assist military spouses in pursuing portable careers that match their skill set, including education and experience; and
(3)
added in evaluating the effectiveness of military spouse employment programs, the Secretary should collect information that provides a comprehensive assessment of the program, including whether program goals are being achieved.
(c)
added Data collection related to efforts to address underemployment of military spouses—
(1)
added Data collection required— In addition to monitoring the number of military spouses who obtain employment through military spouse employment programs, the Secretary of Defense shall collect data to evaluate the effectiveness of military spouse employment programs in addressing the underemployment of military spouses and in closing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts. Information collected shall include whether positions obtained by military spouses through military spouse employment programs match their education and experience.
(2)
added Report required— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the progress of military spouse employment programs in reducing military spouse unemployment, reducing the wage gap between military spouses and their civilian counterparts, and addressing the underemployment of military spouses.
(d)
added Military spouse employment programs defined— In this section, the term “military spouse employment programs” means the Military Spouse Employment Partnership (MSEP).

Sec. 552 Pilot program to assist members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment

(a)
Program required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services to eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) for the purposes of—
(1)
assisting such members in obtaining post-service employment; and
(2)
reducing the amount of “Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers” that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating pays into the Unemployment Trust Fund.
(b)
Eligible members— Employment services provided under the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who are being separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty.
(c)
Evaluation of use of civilian employment staffing agencies—
(1)
Program described— The Secretary of Defense shall execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment.
(2)
Program management— The program required by this subsection shall be managed by an civilian organization (in this section referred to as the “program manager”) whose principal members have experience—
(A)
administering pay-for-performance programs; and
(B)
within the employment staffing industry.
(3)
Exclusion— The program manager may not be a staffing agency.
(d)
changed Eligible civilian employment staffing agencies— The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the program manager shall establish the eligibility requirements to be used by the program manager for the selection of civilian employment staffing agencies to participate in the program.program. In establishing the eligibility requirements to be used by the program manager for the selection of the civilian employment staffing agencies, the Secretary of Defense shall also take into account civilian employment staffing agencies that are willing to work and consult with State and county Veterans Affairs offices and State National Guard offices, when appropriate.
(e)
Payment of staffing agency fees— To encourage employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces under the program, the program manager shall pay a participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the member's hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be made after the member has been employed and paid by the private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the program manager. The staffing agency shall be paid on a weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to exceed a total of 800 hours.
(f)
Oversight requirements— In conducting the program, the Secretary of Defense shall establish—
(1)
program monitoring standards; and
(2)
reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the month, and the number of members who remained employed with the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of employment.
(g)
Limitation on total program obligations— The total amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense for the program may not exceed $35,000,000 during a fiscal year.
(h)
Reporting requirements—
(1)
Report Required— Not later than January 15, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the results of the program, particularly whether the program achieved the purposes specified in subsection (a).
(2)
Comparison with other programs— The report shall include a comparison of the results of the program conducted under this section and the results of other employment assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost to the Department per member.
(3)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(i)
Duration of authority— The authority of the Secretary of Defense to carry out programs under this section expires on September 30, 2018.

Sec. 553 Direct employment pilot program for members of the National Guard and Reserve

added
(a)
added Program authority— The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves.
(b)
added Administration— The pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code.
(c)
added Cost-sharing requirement— As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in the State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 30 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary of Defense under this section.
(d)
added Direct Employment Program Model— The pilot program should follow a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with a member of a reserve component to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including services such as identifying unemployed and under employed members, job matching services, resume editing, interview preparation, and post-employment follow up. Development of the pilot program should be informed by State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components, such as the programs conducted in California and South Carolina.
(e)
added Evaluation— The Secretary of Defense shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of the pilot program.
(f)
added Reporting requirements—
(1)
added Report Required— Not later than March 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(2)
added Elements of Report— A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members.
(B)
added An assessment of the impact of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment levels on the readiness of members of the reserve components.
(C)
added A comparison of the pilot program to other programs conducted by the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs to provide unemployment and underemployment support to members of the reserve components.
(D)
added Any other matters considered appropriate by the Secretary.
(g)
added Limitation on total fiscal-year obligations— The total amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense to carry out the pilot program for any fiscal year may not exceed $20,000,000.
(h)
added Duration of Authority—
(1)
added In general— The authority to carry out the pilot program expires September 30, 2018.
(2)
added Extension— Upon the expiration of the authority under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense may extend the pilot program for not more than two additional fiscal years.

Sec. 554 Enhancement of authority to accept support for United States Air Force Academy athletic programs

added

added Section 9362 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (e), (f), and (g) and inserting the following new subsections:

added “(e) Acceptance of support

added “(1) Support received from the corporation—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary of the Air Force may accept from the corporation funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

added “(2) Funds received from other sources—The Secretary may charge fees for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy. The Secretary may accept and retain fees for services and other benefits provided incident to the operation of its athletic programs, including fees from the National Collegiate Athletic Association, fees from athletic conferences, game guarantees from other educational institutions, fees for ticketing or licensing, and other consideration provided incidental to the execution of the athletic programs of the Academy.

added “(3) Limitation—The Secretary shall ensure that contributions accepted under this subsection do not reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner, or compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.

added “(f) Leases and licenses

added “(1) Support received from the corporation—In accordance with section 2667 of this title, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into leases or licenses with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Consideration provided under such a lease or license may be provided in the form of funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.

added “(2) Support to the corporation—The Secretary may provide support services to the corporation without charge while the corporation conducts its support activities at the Academy. In this section, the term “support services” includes the providing of utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services, records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property. Any such support services may only be provided without any liability of the United States to the corporation.

added “(g) Contracts and cooperative agreements—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property, services, or travel for the direct benefit or use of the Academy athletic programs.

added “(h) Trademarks and service marks

added “(1) Licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements—Consistent with section 2260 (other than subsection (d)) of this title, an agreement under subsection (g) may authorize the corporation to enter into licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Air Force.

added “(2) Limitations—No such licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into if it would reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner, or if the Secretary determines that the use of the trademark or service mark would compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.”

Sec. 555 Report on tuition assistance

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of the Army shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the requirement of the Army, effective January 1, 2014, that members of the Army may become eligible for the Army’s tuition assistance program only after serving a period of 1 year after completing certain training courses, such as advance individual training, officer candidate school, and the basic officer leader course.
(b)
added Contents— The report under subsection (a) shall include the Secretary’s—
(1)
added evaluation of the potential savings in costs resulting from requiring all service members to wait a period of 1 year after training described in subsection (a) before becoming eligible for the Army’s tuition assistance program;
(2)
added evaluation of the impact that the 1-year waiting period described in subsection (a) will have on recruitment for the National Guard; and
(3)
added explanation of the extent to which the qualities of the National Guard, including the role of college students and college-bound students in the National Guard, were considered before reaching the decision to require all service members to wait a period of 1 year before becoming eligible for the Army’s tuition assistance program.

Sec. 565 Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012

Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended—

(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
changed by striking “2-year” and inserting “4-year”; “5-year”; and
(B)
by inserting before the period at the end the following, “, except that amendment made by subsection (b) to subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) shall be effective for a 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act”; and
(2)
in paragraph (4)—
(A)
by striking “The amendments” and inserting the following:

“(A) In general—The amendments”

(B)
by inserting “and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph” after “subsection (b)”;
(C)
changed by striking “2-year” and inserting “4-year”;“5-year”;
(D)
by inserting “and such subparagraph” after “such subsection” each place it appears; and
(E)
by adding at the end the following:

“(B) Special rule—For the period beginning January 3, 2015, and ending January 2, 2017, subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) is amended to read as follows:”

Sec. 574 Recognition of Wereth massacre of 11 African-American soldiers of the United States Army during the Battle of the Bulge

added

added Congress officially recognizes the dedicated service and ultimate sacrifice on behalf of the United States of the 11 African-American soldiers of the 333rd Field Artillery Battalion of the United States Army who were massacred in Wereth, Belgium, during the Battle of the Bulge on December 17, 1944.

Sec. 575 Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall—

(1)
added conduct a review of the initial review, findings, and actions undertaken by the Army in connection with the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht; and
(2)
added submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the review required by this section, including an accounting of all evidence submitted with regard to the nomination.

Sec. 586 Comptroller General and military department reports on hazing in the Armed Forces

added
(a)
added Comptroller general report—
(1)
added Report required— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the designated congressional committees a report on the policies to prevent hazing, and systems initiated to track incidents of hazing, in each of the Armed Forces, including reserve components, officer candidate schools, military service academies, military academy preparatory schools, and basic training and professional schools for enlisted members.
(2)
added Elements— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added An evaluation of the definition of hazing by the Armed Forces.
(B)
added A description of the criteria used, and the methods implemented, in the systems to track incidents of hazing in the Armed Forces.
(C)
added An assessment of the following:
(i)
added The scope of hazing in each Armed Force.
(ii)
added The policies in place and the training on hazing provided to members throughout the course of their careers for each Armed Force.
(iii)
added The available outlets through which victims or witnesses of hazing can report hazing both within and outside their chain of command, and whether or not anonymous reporting is permitted.
(iv)
added The actions taken to mitigate hazing incidents in each Armed Force.
(v)
added The effectiveness of the training and policies in place regarding hazing.
(vi)
added The number of alleged and substantiated incidents of hazing over the last five years for each Armed Force, the nature of these cases and actions taken to address such matters through non-judicial and judicial action.
(D)
added An evaluation of the additional actions, if any, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security propose to take to further address the incidence of hazing in the Armed Forces.
(E)
added Such recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate for improving hazing prevention programs, policies, and other actions taken to address hazing within the Armed Forces.
(3)
added Designated congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term “designated congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
(b)
added Military department reports—
(1)
added Reports required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing an update to the hazing reports required by section 534 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1726).
(2)
added Elements— Each report on an Armed Force required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added A discussion of the policies of the Armed Force for preventing and responding to incidents of hazing, including discussion of any changes or newly implemented policies since the submission of the reports required by section 534 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.
(B)
added A description of the methods implemented to track and report, including report anonymously, incidents of hazing in the Armed Force.
(C)
added An assessment by the Secretary submitting such report of the following:
(i)
added The scope of the problem of hazing in the Armed Force.
(ii)
added The effectiveness of training on recognizing, reporting and preventing hazing provided members of the Armed Force.
(iii)
added The actions taken to prevent and respond to hazing incidents in the Armed Force since the submission of the reports under such section.
(D)
added A description of the additional actions, if any, the Secretary submitting such report and the Chief of Staff of the Armed Force propose to take to further address the incidence of hazing in the Armed Force.

Sec. 587 National Institute of Mental Health study of risk and resiliency of United States Special Operations Forces and effectiveness of Preservation of the Force and Families Program

added
(a)
added Study Required— The Director of the National Institute of Mental Health shall conduct a study of the risk and resiliency of the United States Special Operations Forces and effectiveness of the United States Special Operations Command’s Preservation of the Force and Families Program on reducing risk and increasing resiliency.
(b)
added Elements of the Study— The study conducted under subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of each of the following:
(1)
added The mental, behavioral, and psychological health of the United States Special Operations Force, the United States Special Operations Command’s Preservation of the Force and Families Program’s focus on physical development to address the mental, behavioral, and psychological health of the United States Special Operations Force, including measurements of effectiveness on reducing suicide and other mental, behavioral and psychological risks, and increasing resiliency of the United States Special Operations Forces.
(2)
added The United States Special Operations Command’s Human Performance Program, including measurements of effectiveness on reducing risk and increasing resiliency of United States Special Operations Forces.
(3)
added Such other matters as the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health considers appropriate.
(c)
added Submission of Report— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 592 Working Group on Integrated Disability Evaluation System

(a)
Establishment— There is established within the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee under section 320 of title 38, United States Code, a Working Group (in this section referred to as the “Working Group”) to evaluate and reform the Integrated Disability Evaluation System of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Working Group shall be established under the Disability Evaluation System Working Group of the Joint Executive Committee.
(b)
Pilot program—
(1)
In general— The Working Group shall carry out a pilot program that will co-locate the services and personnel of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to create an integrated model that continues the improvement of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System process through—
(A)
increased process efficiencies, as determined by the Working Group;
(B)
the creation of a standardized form set described in subsection (c)(3);
(C)
the elimination of redundancies;
(D)
the improvement of existing process timelines of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System;
(E)
increased service member satisfaction; and
(F)
the establishment of an information technology bridging solution described in subsection (c)(4).
(2)
Duration— The pilot program under paragraph (1) shall be carried for a period not exceeding three years.
(c)
Goals of pilot program— In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall ensure the following:
(1)
The period beginning on the date on which an eligible member begins to participate in the pilot program and ending on the date on which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the member is not more than 295 days.
(2)
Employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs who carry out the pilot program are co-located in the same facility, to the extent practicable, to determine the efficiencies provided by locating services of the Departments in the same location.
(3)
The elimination of redundant forms by creating and using a standardized electronic form set with respect to information that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs both require for an eligible member participating in the pilot program.
(4)
The establishment of an information technology bridging solution between the existing E-benefits program and the MYIDES dashboard to ensure that both such programs contain the information that is added to the claim of an eligible member participating in the pilot program.
(5)
Using the solution established under paragraph (4), eligible members participating in the pilot program are able to use the existing identification number of the member used by the Department of Defense to—
(A)
automatically track the status of the claim of the member, including with respect to the office of the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs that is responsible for the evaluation as of the date of accessing such solution; and
(B)
be informed of the estimated timeline of the evaluation of the claim.
(6)
Using the solution established under paragraph (4), the Working Group and the Secretaries may—
(A)
identify the office and employee of the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs who are responsible for the evaluation of a claim at any given time; and
(B)
track individual employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs with respect to statistics measuring quality and accuracy at the case level.
(7)
Eligible members who participate in the pilot program have the opportunity to use an exit survey (approved by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs) that informs the Working Group of the satisfaction of the member with respect to the pilot program.
(d)
Eligible members— A member of the Armed Forces who is being separated or retired from the Armed Forces for disability under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, is eligible to participate in the pilot program under subsection (b) if—
(1)
the member is referred to the Integrated Disability Evaluation System beginning on or after the date of the commencement of the pilot program by the specific medical authority of a military department; and
(2)
the evaluation of the member under the Integrated Disability Evaluation System is processed at the disability rating activity site in Providence, Rhode Island.
(e)
Timeline— By not later than 120 days after the date of the first meeting of the Working Group, the Working Group shall—
(1)
changed establish the pilot program under subsection (b); and(b);
(2)
establish standards for the products, software, personnel, approved standardized electronic form set described in subsection (c)(3), and other matters required to carry out the pilot program; and
(3)
identify the security required for the information systems of the pilot program.
(f)
Location— The pilot program established under subsection (b) shall be located at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.
(g)
Cooperation—
(1)
Assignment— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall assign employees of both Departments to the location specified in subsection (f) during the period in which the pilot program is carried out.
(2)
Prioritization— As determined appropriate by the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee, employees of the Veterans Benefits Administration who rate claims for disability may be assigned to the pilot program under subsection (b) in a sufficient number to ensure that claims for disability that are approved are processed—
(A)
for proposed rating decision not later than 15 days after such approval; and
(B)
for notification of benefits and authorization of award not later than 30 days after separation from the Armed Forces.
(h)
Treatment in current IDES— If an eligible member who is participating in the pilot program under subsection (b) elects to instead participate in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate the eligible member under the Integrated Disability Evaluation System by recognizing the date of the original claim of the member and without any penalty with respect to the priority of the member in such system.
(i)
Reports—
(1)
Quarterly reports— During each 90-day period during the period in which the Working Group carries out the pilot program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee a report on the status of the pilot program. The report shall include—
(A)
the average number of days that an eligible member participates in the pilot program before the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the member;
(B)
the extent to which forms have been eliminated pursuant to subsection (c)(3);
(C)
the extent to which the information technology bridging solution established pursuant to subsection (c)(4) has improved information sharing between the Departments;
(D)
the results of exit surveys described in subsection (c)(7);
(E)
the extent to which employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been co-located in the same facility under the pilot program; and
(F)
the determination of the Working Group, based on data collected during the course of the pilot program, with respect to the feasibility of increasing the efficiency of the program to decrease the number of days of the goal described in subsection (c)(1).
(2)
Submission of quarterly reports— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Working Group submits a report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees such report.
(3)
Final report— Not later than 180 days after the date on which the pilot program under subsection (b) is completed, the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee a report on the pilot program, including an analysis of the pilot program and any recommendations regarding whether the pilot program should be expanded.
(4)
Submission of final report— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Working Group submits the report under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees such report.
(j)
Membership—
(1)
Number and appointment— The Working Group shall be composed of 15 members appointed by the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee from among individuals who have subject matter expertise or other relevant experience in government, the private sector, or academia regarding—
(A)
health care;
(B)
medical records;
(C)
logistics;
(D)
information technology; or
(E)
other relevant subjects.
(2)
Disqualification— An individual may not be appointed to the Working Group if the individual has served on the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee or any working group thereof.
(3)
Employees of Departments— Not more than a total of four individuals who are employed by either the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be appointed to the Working Group to ensure that the efficiencies and best practices of the pilot program do not violate the policies of the Departments. Such an individual who is appointed may not serve as chairman of the Working Group or serve in any other supervisory or leadership role.
(4)
Advisors— The Working Group shall seek advice from experts from nongovernmental organizations (including veterans service organizations, survivors of members of the Armed Forces or veterans, and military organizations), the Internet technology industry, private sector hospital administrators, and other entities the Working Group determines appropriate.
(5)
Chairman— Except as provided by paragraph (3), the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee shall designate a member of the Working Group to serve as chairman of the Working Group.
(6)
Period of Appointment— Members of the Working Group shall be appointed for the life of the Working Group. A vacancy shall not affect its powers.
(7)
Vacancy— A vacancy on the Working Group shall be filled in the manner in which the original appointment was made.
(8)
Appointment deadline— The appointment of members of the Working Group established in this section shall be made not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(9)
Compensation of Members— Each member of the Working Group who is not an officer or employee of the United States shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Working Group. All members of the Working Group who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(k)
Meetings—
(1)
Initial meeting— The Working Group shall hold its first meeting not later than 15 days after the date on which a majority of the members are appointed.
(2)
Minimum number of meetings— The Working Group shall meet not less than twice each year regarding the pilot program under subsection (b), including the progress, status, implementation, and execution of the pilot program.
(l)
Termination of Working Group— The Working Group shall terminate on the date on which the Working Group submits the report under subsection (i)(3).
(m)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term appropriate congressional committees means the following:
(A)
The Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(B)
The Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
(2)
The term Integrated Disability Evaluation System means the disability evaluation system used jointly by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

Sec. 594 Authority for removal from national cemeteries of remains of deceased members of the Armed Forces who have no known next of kin

added
(a)
added Removal authority— Section 1488 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c) Removal when no known next of kin

added “(1) The Secretary of the Army may authorize the removal of the remains of a member of the armed forces who has no known next of kin and is buried in an Army National Military Cemetery from the Army National Military Cemetery for transfer to any other cemetery.

added “(2) The Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, may authorize the removal of the remains of a member of the armed forces who has no known next of kin and is buried in a cemetery of the National Cemetery System from that cemetery for transfer to any Army National Military Cemetery.

added “(3) In this section, the term “Army National Military Cemetery” means a cemetery specified in section 4721(b) of this title.”

(b)
added Conforming amendments— Such section is further amended—
(1)
added by inserting before “If a cemetery” the following:

added “(a) Removal upon discontinuance of installation cemetery”

(2)
added by striking “his jurisdiction” and inserting “the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned”; and
(3)
added by inserting before “With respect to” the following:

added “(b) Removal from temporary interment or abandoned grave or cemetery”

Sec. 595 Access of congressional caseworkers to information about Department of Veterans Affairs casework brokered to other offices of the Department

added

added If Department of Veterans Affairs casework is brokered out to another office of the Department from its original submission site, a caseworker in a congressional office may contact the brokered office to receive an update on the constituent’s case, and that office of the Department is required to update the congressional staffer regardless of their thoughts on jurisdiction.

Sec. 596 Pilot program on provision of certain information to State veterans agencies to facilitate the transition of members of the Armed Forces from military service to civilian life

added
(a)
added Pilot program required— Commencing not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing the information described in subsection (b) on members of the Armed Forces who are separating from the Armed Forces to State veterans agencies as a means of facilitating the transition of members of the Armed Forces from military service to civilian life.
(b)
added Covered information— The information described in this subsection with respect to a member is as follows:
(1)
added Department of Defense Form DD 214.
(2)
added A personal email address.
(3)
added A personal telephone number.
(4)
added A mailing address.
(c)
added Voluntary participation— The participation of a member in the pilot program shall be at the election of the member.
(d)
added Form of provision of information— Information shall be provided to State veterans agencies under the pilot program in digitized electronic form.
(e)
added Use of information— Information provided to State veterans agencies under the pilot program may be shared by such agencies with appropriate county veterans service offices in such manner and for such purposes as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of the pilot program.
(f)
added Report— Not later than 15 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the pilot program. The report shall include a description of the pilot program and such recommendations, including recommendations for continuing or expanding the pilot program, as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot program.

Sec. 597 Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added Commencing August 26, 1946, though late February 1947 the United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program Task Force 68, codenamed “Operation Highjump” initiated and undertook the largest ever-to-this-date exploration of the Antarctic continent.
(2)
added The primary mission of the Task Force 68 organized by Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. USN, (Ret) and led by Rear Admiral Richard H. Cruzen, USN, was to do the following:
(A)
added Establish the Antarctic research base Little America IV.
(B)
added In the defense of the United States of America from possible hostile aggression from abroad - to train personnel test equipment, develop techniques for establishing, maintaining and utilizing air bases on ice, with applicability comparable to interior Greenland, where conditions are similar to those of the Antarctic.
(C)
added Map and photograph a full two-thirds of the Antarctic Continent during the classified, hazardous duty/volunteer-only operation involving 4700 sailors, 23 aircraft and 13 ships including the first submarine the U.S.S. Sennet, and the aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Philippine Sea, brought to the edge of the ice pack to launch (6) Navy ski-equipped, rocket-assisted R4Ds
(D)
added Consolidate and extend United States sovereignty over the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent.
(E)
added Determine the feasibility of establishing, maintaining and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating possible base sites.
(3)
added While on a hazardous duty/all volunteer mission vital to the interests of National Security and while over the eastern Antarctica coastline known as the Phantom Coast, the PBM–5 Martin Mariner “Flying Boat” “George 1” entered a whiteout over Thurston Island. As the pilot attempted to climb, the aircraft grazed the glacier’s ridgeline and exploded within 5 seconds instantly killing Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Navigator and Wendell “Bud” Hendersin, Aviation Machinists Mate 1st Class while Frederick Williams, Aviation Radioman 1st Class died several hours later. Six other crewmen survived including the Captain of the “George 1’s” seaplane tender U.S.S. Pine Island.
(4)
added The bodies of the dead were protected from the desecration of Antarctic scavenging birds (Skuas) by the surviving crew wrapping the bodies and temporarily burying the men under the starboard wing engine nacelle.
(5)
added Rescue requirements of the “George 1” survivors forced the abandonment of their crewmates’ bodies.
(6)
added Conditions prior to the departure of Task Force 68 precluded a return to the area to the recover the bodies.
(7)
added For nearly 60 years Navy promised the families that they would recover the men: “If the safety, logistical, and operational prerequisites allow a mission in the future, every effort will be made to bring our sailors home.”.
(8)
added The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command twice offered to recover the bodies of this crew for Navy.
(9)
added A 2004 NASA ground penetrating radar overflight commissioned by Navy relocated the crash site three miles from its crash position.
(10)
added The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command offered to underwrite the cost of an aerial ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey of the crash site area by NASA.
(11)
added The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command studied the recovery with the recognized recovery authorities and national scientists and determined that the recovery is only “medium risk”.
(12)
added National Science Foundation and scientists from the University of Texas, Austin, regularly visit the island.
(13)
added The crash site is classified as a “perishable site”, meaning a glacier that will calve into the Bellingshausen Sea.
(14)
added The National Science Foundation maintains a presence in area of the Pine Island Glacier.
(15)
added The National Science Foundation Director of Polar Operations will assist and provide assets for the recovery upon the request of Congress.
(16)
added The United States Coast Guard is presently pursuing the recovery of 3 WWII air crewmen from similar circumstances in Greenland.
(17)
added On Memorial Day, May 25, 2009, President Barack Obama declared: “* * * the support of our veterans is a sacred trust * * * we need to serve them as they have served us * * * that means bringing home all our POWs and MIAs * * *”.
(18)
added The policies and laws of the United States of America require that our armed service personnel be repatriated.
(19)
added The fullest possible accounting of United States fallen military personnel means repatriating living American POWs and MIAs, accounting for, identifying, and recovering the remains of military personnel who were killed in the line of duty, or providing convincing evidence as to why such a repatriation, accounting, identification, or recovery is not possible.
(20)
added It is the responsibility of the Federal Government to return to the United States for proper burial and respect all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty who lie in lost graves.
(b)
added Sense of congress— In light of the findings under subsection (a), Congress—
(1)
added reaffirms its support for the recovery and return to the United States, the remains and bodies of all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, and for the efforts by the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command to recover the remains of members of the Armed Forces from all wars, conflicts and missions;
(2)
added recognizes the courage and sacrifice of all members of the Armed Forces who participated in Operation Highjump and all missions vital to the national security of the United States of America;
(3)
added acknowledges the dedicated research and efforts by the US Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, the Fallen American Veterans Foundation and all persons and organizations to identify, locate, and advocate for, from their temporary Antarctic grave, the recovery of the well-preserved frozen bodies of Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Naval Aviator, Frederick Williams, Aviation Machinist’s Mate 1ST Class, Wendell Hendersin, Aviation Radioman 1ST Class of the “George 1” explosion and crash; and
(4)
added encourages the Department of Defense to review the facts, research and to pursue new efforts to undertake all feasible efforts to recover, identify, and return the well-preserved frozen bodies of the “George 1” crew from Antarctica’s Thurston Island.

Sec. 598 Name of the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic, Marina, California

added
(a)
added Designation— The Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic to be constructed at the intersection of the proposed Ninth Street and the proposed First Avenue in Marina, California, shall be known and designated as the “Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient Clinic”.
(b)
added References— Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States to the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the “Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient Clinic”.

Sec. 599 Sense of Congress regarding preservation of Second Amendment rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in the District of Columbia

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(2)
added Approximately 40,000 servicemen and women across all branches of the Armed Forces either live in or are stationed on active duty within the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Unless these individuals are granted a waiver as serving in a law enforcement role, they are subject to the District of Columbia’s onerous and highly restrictive laws on the possession of firearms.
(3)
added Military personnel, despite being extensively trained in the proper and safe use of firearms, are therefore deprived by the laws of the District of Columbia of handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are commonly kept by law-abiding persons throughout the United States for sporting use and for lawful defense of their persons, homes, businesses, and families.
(4)
added The District of Columbia has one of the highest per capita murder rates in the Nation, which may be attributed in part to previous local laws prohibiting possession of firearms by law-abiding persons who would have otherwise been able to defend themselves and their loved ones in their own homes and businesses.
(5)
added The Gun Control Act of 1968 (as amended by the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act) and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere. In addition, existing District of Columbia criminal laws punish possession and illegal use of firearms by violent criminals and felons. Consequently, there is no need for local laws that only affect and disarm law-abiding citizens.
(6)
added On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, and thus ruled that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban and requirements that rifles and shotguns in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or outfitted with a trigger lock to be unconstitutional.
(7)
added On July 16, 2008, the District of Columbia enacted the Firearms Control Emergency Amendment Act of 2008 (D.C. Act 17–422; 55 DCR 8237), which places onerous restrictions on the ability of law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms, thus violating the spirit by which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller.
(8)
added On February 26, 2009, the United States Senate adopted an amendment on a bipartisan vote of 62–36 by Senator John Ensign to S. 160, the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009, which would fully restore Second Amendment rights to the citizens of the District of Columbia.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that active duty military personnel who are stationed or residing in the District of Columbia should be permitted to exercise fully their rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and therefore should be exempt from the District of Columbia’s restrictions on the possession of firearms.

Sec. 622 Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total

added
(a)
added Availability of transportation— Section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

added “(f) Special priority for certain disabled veterans

added “(1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide, at no additional cost to the Department of Defense and with no aircraft modification, transportation on scheduled and unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

added “(2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing space-available transportation priorities under the travel program, the Secretary shall provide transportation under paragraph (1) on the same basis as such transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay.

added “(3) The requirement to provide transportation on Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on the priority basis described in paragraph (2) to veterans covered by this subsection applies whether or not the travel program is established under this section.

added “(4) In this subsection, the terms veteran and service-connected have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 38.”

(b)
added Effective date— Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 632 Review of management, food, and pricing options for defense commissary system

(a)
Review required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of—
(1)
using variable pricing in commissary stores to reduce the expenditure of appropriated funds to operate the defense commissary system;
(2)
implementing a program to make available more private label products in commissary stores;
(3)
changed converting the defense commissary system to a nonappropriated fund instrumentality, instrumentality; and
(4)
eliminating or at least reducing second-destination funding.
(b)
Additional elements of review— The review required by this section also shall consider the following:
(1)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, that would result from displacing current value and name-brand products with private-label products.
(2)
The sensitivity of commissary patrons to pricing changes.
(3)
The feasibility of generating net revenue from pricing and stock assortment changes.
(4)
The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a national and regional basis.
(5)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on industry support; such as vendor stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities and programs.
(6)
The ability of the current commissary management and information technology systems to accommodate changes to the existing pricing and management structure.
(7)
The product category management systems and expertise of the Defense Commissary Agency.
(8)
The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on military exchanges and other morale, welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed Forces.
(9)
The identification of management and legislative changes that would be required in connection with changes to the defense commissary system.
(10)
An estimate of the time required to implement recommended changes to the current pricing and management model of the defense commissary system.
(c)
Submission— Not later than February 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review required by this section.

Sec. 634 Prohibition on the use of funds to close commissary stores

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to close any commissary store.

Sec. 642 Availability for purchase of Department of Veterans Affairs memorial headstones and markers for members of reserve components who performed certain training

added

added Section 2306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(i)

added “(1) The Secretary shall make available for purchase a memorial headstone or marker for the marked or unmarked grave of an individual described in paragraph (2) or for the purpose of commemorating such an individual whose remains are unavailable.

added “(2) An individual described in this paragraph is an individual who—

added “(A) as a member of a National Guard or Reserve component performed inactive duty training or active duty for training for at least six years but did not serve on active duty; and

added “(B) is not otherwise ineligible for a memorial headstone or marker on account of the nature of the individual’s separation from the Armed Forces or other cause.

added “(3) A headstone or marker for the grave of an individual may be purchased under this subsection by—

added “(A) the individual;

added “(B) the surviving spouse, child, sibling, or parent of the individual; or

added “(C) an individual other than the next of kin, as determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

added “(4) In establishing the prices of the headstones and markers made available for purchase under this section, the Secretary shall ensure the prices are sufficient to cover the costs associated with the production and delivery of such headstones and markers.

added “(5) No person may receive any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of this subsection.

added “(6) This subsection does not authorize any new burial benefit for any person or create any new authority for any individual to be buried in a national cemetery.

added “(7) The Secretary shall coordinate with the Secretary of Defense in establishing procedures to determine whether an individual is an individual described in paragraph (2).”

Sec. 703 Availability of breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling under the tricare program

added

added Section 1079(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(18) Breastfeeding support, supplies (including breast pumps and associated equipment), and counseling shall be provided as appropriate during pregnancy and the postpartum period.”

Sec. 704 Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under the TRICARE program

added
(a)
added Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under TRICARE— Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g)

added “(1) Subject to paragraph (4), in providing health care under subsection (a), the treatment of developmental disabilities (as defined by section 102(8) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))), including autism spectrum disorder, shall include behavioral health treatment, including applied behavior analysis, when prescribed by a physician or psychologist.

added “(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that—

added “(A) except as provided by subparagraph (B), behavioral health treatment is provided pursuant to this subsection—

added “(i) in the case of such treatment provided in a State that requires licensing or certification of applied behavioral analysts by State law, by an individual who is licensed or certified to practice applied behavioral analysis in accordance with the laws of the State; or

added “(ii) in the case of such treatment provided in a State other than a State described in clause (i), by an individual who is licensed or certified by a State or an accredited national certification board; and

added “(B) applied behavior analysis or other behavioral health treatment may be provided by an employee, contractor, or trainee of a person described in subparagraph (A) if the employee, contractor, or trainee meets minimum qualifications, training, and supervision requirements as set forth in applicable State law, by an appropriate accredited national certification board, or by the Secretary.

added “(3)

added “(A) This subsection shall not apply to a medicare eligible beneficiary (as defined in section 1111(b) of this title).

added “(B) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the benefits provided to a covered beneficiary under—

added “(i) this chapter;

added “(ii) title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.); or

added “(iii) any other law.

added “(4) In addition to the requirement under section 1100(c)(1) of this title, with respect to retired members of the Coast Guard, the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service, or dependents of any such retired members, treatment shall be provided under this subsection in a fiscal year only to the extent that amounts are specifically provided in advance in appropriations Acts for the Defense Health Program Account for the provision of such treatment for such fiscal year.”

(b)
added Funding matters—
(1)
added In general— Section 1100 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(B)
added by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

added “(c) Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities

added “(1) Funds for treatment under section 1077(g) of this title may be derived only from the Defense Health Program Account. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, such funds may not be reimbursed from any account that would otherwise provide funds for the treatment of retired members of the Coast Guard, the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service, or dependents of any such retired members.

added “(2) As provided for in paragraph (4) of section 1077(g), with respect to retired members of the Coast Guard, the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service, or dependents of any such retired members, treatment under such section shall be provided in a fiscal year only to the extent that amounts are specifically provided in advance in appropriations Acts for the Defense Health Program Account for the provision of such treatment for such fiscal year.”

(2)
added Increase and offset—
(A)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1405 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by $20,000,000.
(B)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 270) is hereby reduced by $20,000,000.
(c)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that amounts should be appropriated for behavioral health treatment of TRICARE beneficiaries, pursuant to the amendments made by this section, in a manner to ensure the appropriate and equitable access to such treatment by all such beneficiaries.

Sec. 715 Provision of written notice of change to TRICARE benefits

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1097c the following new section:

added “1097d. TRICARE program: notice of change to benefits

added “(a) Provision of notice

added “(1) If the Secretary makes a significant change to any benefits provided by the TRICARE program to covered beneficiaries, the Secretary shall provide individuals described in paragraph (2) with written notice explaining such changes.

added “(2) The individuals described by this paragraph are covered beneficiaries and providers participating in the TRICARE program who may be affected by a significant change covered by a notification under paragraph (1).

added “(3) The Secretary shall provide notice under paragraph (1) through electronic means.

added “(b) Timing of notice—The Secretary shall provide notice under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) by the earlier of the following dates:

added “(1) The date that the Secretary determines would afford individuals described in paragraph (2) of such subsection adequate time to understand the change covered by the notification.

added “(2) The date that is 90 days before the date on which the change covered by the notification becomes effective.

added “(3) The effective date of a significant change that is required by law.

added “(c) Significant change defined—In this section, the term “significant change” means a system-wide change—

added “(1) in policy regarding services provided under the TRICARE program (not including the addition of new services or benefits); or

added “(2) in payment rates of more than 20 percent.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1097c the following new item:

Sec. 729 Research regarding breast cancer

added

added In carrying out research, development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to breast cancer, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the recommendations of the Interagency Breast Cancer and Environmental Research Coordinating Committee to prioritize prevention and increase the study of chemical and physical factors in breast cancer.

Sec. 730 Sense of Congress regarding access to mental health services by members of the Armed Forces

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added mental health and substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide are being experienced at alarming levels among members of the Armed Forces;
(2)
added members of the Armed Forces should have adequate access to the support and care they need;
(3)
added public-private mental health partnerships can provide the Department of Defense with an enhanced and unique capability to treat members of the Armed Forces;
(4)
added the Department of Defense should fully implement the pilot program authorized under section 706 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 10101 note; Public Law 112–239) for purposes of enhancing the efforts of the Department of Defense in research, treatment, education, and outreach on mental health and substance use disorders and traumatic brain injury in members of the National Guard and Reserves.

Sec. 731 Evaluation of wounded warrior care and transition program

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that gaining new ideas and an objective perspective are critical to addressing issues regarding the treatment of wounded warriors.
(b)
added Evaluation— The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a private organization to evaluate the wounded warrior care and transition program of the Department of Defense. Such evaluation shall identify deficiencies in the treatment of wounded warriors and offer recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Congress to improve such treatment. The Secretary may not award a contract to a private organization to carry out such evaluation unless the private organization received less than 20 percent of the annual revenue of the organization during the previous five years from contracts with the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(c)
added Funding—
(1)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1405 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, is hereby increased by $20,000,000.
(2)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D—
(A)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, is hereby reduced by $10,000,000; and
(B)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in division C for weapons activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4701, for the B61 life extension program and the W76 life extension program are each hereby reduced by $5,000,000.

Sec. 732 Improvement of mental health care

added
(a)
added Evaluations of Mental Health Care and Suicide Prevention Programs—
(1)
added In general— Not less than once each year, the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code) shall contract with a third party unaffiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense to conduct an evaluation of the mental health care and suicide prevention programs carried out under the laws administered by such Secretary.
(2)
added Elements— Each evaluation conducted under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
added use metrics that are common among and useful for practitioners in the field of mental health care and suicide prevention;
(B)
added identify the most effective mental health care and suicide prevention programs conducted by the Secretary concerned;
(C)
added propose best practices for caring for individuals who suffer from mental health disorders or are at risk of suicide; and
(D)
added make recommendations to improve the coordination and integration of mental health and suicide prevention services between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense to improve the delivery and effectiveness of such services.

Sec. 733 Primary blast injury research

added

added The peer-reviewed Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program shall conduct a study on blast injury mechanics covering a wide range of primary blast injury conditions, including traumatic brain injury, in order to accelerate solution development in this critical area.

Sec. 734 Report on efforts to treat infertility of military families

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on what steps the Secretary is taking to ensure that members of the Armed Forces and the dependents of such members have access to reproductive counseling and a full spectrum of treatments for infertility, including in vitro fertilization.
(b)
added Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An assessment of treatment options available at military medical treatment facilities throughout the military health system.
(2)
added An identification of factors that might disrupt treatment, including availability of options, lack of timely access to treatment, change in duty station, or overseas deployments.
(3)
added The number of members of the Armed Forces who have used specific treatment options, including in vitro fertilization.
(4)
added The number of dependents of members who have used specific treatment options, including in vitro fertilization.
(5)
added An identification of non-Department of Defense treatment options for infertility that could benefit members and the dependents of members.
(6)
added Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 735 Sense of Congress on use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder are the signature injuries of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
(2)
added Post-traumatic stress disorder is prevalent throughout the regular component of the Armed Forces.
(3)
added For example, with respect to Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, which has a base population of 41,753 active duty personnel, including 38,020 marines and 3,533 sailors—
(A)
added 6,616 patients with a principal diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder had at least one visit for post-traumatic stress disorder between February 2013 and April 2014; and
(B)
added the Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune, which had a total of approximately 600,000 outpatient visits during 2013, recorded 15,043 outpatient visits for which post-traumatic stress disorder was the primary reason for the visit between February 2013 and April 2014.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a medical treatment that can be used to treat active duty members of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder if—
(A)
added such treatment is prescribed by a military medical doctor; and
(B)
added a hyperbaric chamber that is owned by the Department of Defense and cleared for clinical use is locally available; and
(2)
added the Secretary of Defense should increase awareness among members of the Armed Forces, including military medical doctors, of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Sec. 805 Maximizing competition in design-build contracts

added
(a)
added Public design-build construction process improvement— Section 3309 of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting “and the contract is in an amount of $1,000,000 or greater” after “appropriate for use”;
(2)
added by striking the second sentence of subsection (d) and inserting the following: “The maximum number specified in the solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the head of the agency approves the contracting officer’s justification with respect to the solicitation that a number greater than 5 is in the Federal Government’s interest. The contracting officer shall provide written documentation of how a maximum number exceeding 5 is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures.”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f) Report

added “(1) In general—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall require the head of each agency to appoint an individual who shall provide to the Director an annual compilation of each instance the agency awarded a contract pursuant to this section in which—

added “(A) more than 5 offerors were selected to submit competitive proposals pursuant to subsection (c)(4); or

added “(B) the contract was awarded without using the two-phase selection procedures described in subsection (c).

added “(2) Publication—The Director shall prepare an annual report containing the information provided by each executive agency under subparagraph (A). The report shall be accessible to the public through electronic means, and the Director shall publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register.

added “(3) Fiscal years covered; deadline—The Director shall submit to Congress the report prepared under subparagraph (B) for the fiscal year during which this subsection is enacted, and each of the next 4 fiscal years, not later than 60 days after the end of each such fiscal year.”

(b)
added Defense design-build construction process improvement— Section 2305a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting “and the contract is in an amount of $1,000,000 or greater” after “appropriate for use”;
(2)
added by striking the second sentence of subsection (d) and inserting the following: “The maximum number specified in the solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the head of the agency approves the contracting officer’s justification with respect to an individual solicitation that a number greater than 5 is in the Federal Government’s interest. The contracting officer shall provide written documentation of how a maximum number exceeding 5 is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures.”; and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Report

added “(1) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall require the head of each agency to appoint an individual who shall provide to the Director an annual compilation of each instance the agency awarded a contract pursuant to this section in which—

added “(A) more than 5 offerors were selected to submit competitive proposals pursuant to subsection (c)(4); or

added “(B) the contract was awarded without using the two-phase selection procedures described in subsection (c).

added “(2) The Director shall prepare an annual report containing the information provided by each executive agency under subparagraph (A). The report shall be accessible to the public through electronic means, and the Director shall publish a notice of availability in the Federal Register.

added “(3) The Director shall submit to Congress the report prepared under subparagraph (B) for the fiscal year during which this subsection is enacted, and each of the next 4 fiscal years, not later than 60 days after the end of each such fiscal year”

(c)
added GAO report— Not later than the end of fiscal year 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall issue a report analyzing the extent to which Federal agencies are in compliance with the reporting requirements in section 2305a(f) of title 10, United States Code, and section 3309(g) of title 41, United States Code.

Sec. 806 Permanent authority for use of simplified acquisition procedures for certain commercial items

added

added Section 4202 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (division D of Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking subsection (e).

Sec. 813 Plan for improving data on bundled and consolidated contracts

Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(s) Data quality improvement plan

“(1) In general—Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2016, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, in consultation with the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of the General Services Administration shall develop a plan to improve the quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts in the Federal procurement data system.

“(2) Plan requirements—The plan shall—

“(A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the Directors of the Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, the senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers in implementing the plan described in paragraph (1) and contributing to the annual report required by subsection (p)(4);

“(B) make necessary changes to policies and procedures on proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and consolidation, and to training procedures of relevant personnel on proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and consolidation;

“(C) establish consequences for failure to properly identify contracts as bundled or consolidated;

“(D) establish requirements for periodic and statistically valid data verification and validation; and

“(E) assign clear data verification responsibilities.

“(3) Committee briefing—Once finalized and by not later than 90 days prior to implementation, the plan described in this subsection shall be presented to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.

“(4) Implementation—Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2017, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall implement the plan described in this subsection.

“(5) Certification—The Administrator shall annually provide to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate certification of the accuracy and completeness of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.

“(6) GAO study and report

“(A) Study—Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate a study on the effectiveness of the plan described in this subsection that shall assess whether contracts were accurately labeled as bundled or consolidated.

“(B) Contracts evaluated—For the purposes of conducting the study described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States—

“(i) shall evaluate, for work in each of sectors 23, 33, 54, and 56 (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System), not fewer than 100 contracts in each sector;

“(ii) shall evaluate only those contracts—

“(I) awarded by an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code; and

“(II) that have a Base and Exercised Options Value, an Action Obligation, or a Base and All Options Value exceeding $10,000,000; and

“(iii) shall not evaluate contracts that have used any set aside authority.

“(C) Report—Not later than 12 months after initiating the study required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any recommendations on how to improve the quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.

“(7) Definitions—In this subsection the following definitions shall apply:

“(A) Chief Acquisition Officer; senior procurement executive—The terms Chief Acquisition Officer and senior procurement executive have the meanings given such terms in section 44 of this Act.

changed “(B) Federal procurement data system definitions—The terms Base and Exercised Options Value, Action Obligation, Base and All Options Value, and set aside authority have the meanings given such terms by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in the Federal procurement data system on October 1, 2013, or subsequent equivalent terms.”terms.

added “(C) Definition—For purposes of this section, the term “a contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative” shall mean a contract award pursuant to the process established by the Interagency Strategic Sourcing Leadership Council that was created by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Memorandum M–13–02 issued on December 5, 2012.

added “(8) Study of Strategic Sourcing

added “(A) Study—Not later than the last day of fiscal year 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate a study on the affect of contracts awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative on the small business industrial base.

added “(B) Scope—For each North American Classification System Code assigned to a contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative, the Comptroller General of the United States shall examine the following:

added “(i) The number of small business concerns participating as prime contractors in that North American Industrial Classification System code in the federal procurement marketplace prior to the award of a contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative.

added “(ii) The number of small business concerns participating as prime contractors in that North American Industrial Classification System code in the federal procurement marketplace after the award of a contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative.

added “(iii) The number of small business concerns anticipated to be participating as prime contractors in that North American Industrial Classification System code in the federal procurement marketplace at the time that the a contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative expires.

added “(iv) The affect of any changes between subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) on the health of the small business industrial base, and the sustainability of any savings achieved by contract awarded as part of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative.

added “(C) Report—Not later than 12 months after initiating the study required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any recommendations on how to mitigate any negative affects on the small business industrial base or the sustainability of savings.”

Sec. 816 Improving Federal Surety Bonds

(a)
added Surety bond requirements— Chapter 93 of subtitle VI of title 31, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by adding at the end the following:

added “9310. Individual sureties

added “If another applicable law or regulation permits the acceptance of a bond from a surety that is not subject to sections 9305 and 9306 and is based on a pledge of assets by the surety, the assets pledged by such surety shall—

added “(1) consist of eligible obligations described under section 9303(a); and

added “(2) be submitted to the official of the Government required to approve or accept the bond, who shall deposit the assets with a depository described under section 9303(b).”

(2)
added in the table of contents for such chapter, by adding at the end the following:
(b)
added SBA surety bond guarantee— Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking “70” and inserting “90”.
(c)
added GAO Study—
(1)
added Study— The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study on the following:
(A)
added All instances during the 10-year period prior to the date of enactment of the Act in which a surety bond proposed or issued by a surety in connection with a Federal project was—
(i)
added rejected by a Federal contracting officer; or
(ii)
added accepted by a Federal contracting officer, but was later found to have been backed by insufficient collateral or to be otherwise deficient or with respect to which the surety did not perform.
(B)
added The consequences to the Federal Government, subcontractors, and suppliers of the instances described under paragraph (1).
(C)
added The percentages of all Federal contracts that were awarded to new startup businesses (including new startup businesses that are small disadvantaged businesses or disadvantaged business enterprises), small disadvantaged businesses, and disadvantaged business enterprises as prime contractors in the 2-year period prior to and the 2-year period following the date of enactment of this Act, and an assessment of the impact of this Act and the amendments made by this Act upon such percentages.
(2)
added Report— Not later than the end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall issue a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under subsection (a).
(3)
added Definitions— For purposes of this section:
(A)
added Disadvantaged business enterprise— The term “disadvantaged business enterprise” has the meaning given that term under section 26.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
(B)
added New startup business— The term “new startup business” means a business that was formed in the 2-year period ending on the date on which the business bids on a Federal contract that requires giving a surety bond.
(C)
added Small disadvantaged business— The term “small disadvantaged business” has the meaning given that term under section 124.1002(b) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations.

removed Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking “70” and inserting “90”.

Sec. 817 Publication of required justification that consolidation of contract requirements

added

added Section 44(c)(2)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657q(c)(2)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “This justification shall be published prior to the issuance of a solicitation.”.

Sec. 818 Small business prime and subcontract participation goals raised; accounting of subcontractors

added
(a)
added Prime contracting goals— Section 15(g)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)(A)) is amended—
(1)
added in clause (i), by striking “23 percent” and inserting “25 percent”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new clause:

added “(vi) The Governmentwide goal for participation by small business concerns in subcontract awards shall be established at not less than 40 percent of the total value of all subcontract dollars awarded pursuant to section 8(d) of this Act for each fiscal year.”

(b)
added Delayed effective date— The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) of this section shall take effect only beginning on the date on which the Administrator of the Small Business Administration has promulgated any regulations necessary, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation has been revised, to implement section 1614 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 and the amendments made by such section.
(c)
added Repeal of certain provision pertaining to accounting of subcontractors— Section 15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)) is amended by striking paragraph (3).

Sec. 819 Small business cyber education

added

added The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, may make every reasonable effort to promote an outreach and education program to assist small businesses (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) contracted by the Department of Defense to assist such businesses to—

(1)
added understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats;
(2)
added develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and
(3)
added develop a plan to protect the networks of such businesses.

Sec. 827 Sole source contracts for small business concerns owned and controlled by women

added
(a)
added In general— Subsection (m) of section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(m)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

added “(7) Authority for sole source contracts for economically disadvantaged small business concerns owned and controlled by women—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women meeting the requirements of paragraph (2)(A) if—

added “(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity;

added “(B) the anticipated award price of the contract (including options) will not exceed—

added “(i) $6,500,000, in the case of a contract opportunity assigned a standard industrial code for manufacturing; or

added “(ii) $4,000,000, in the case of any other contract opportunity; and

added “(C) in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.

added “(8) Authority for sole source contracts for small business concerns owned and controlled by women in substantially underrepresented industries—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women that meets the requirements of paragraph (2)(E) and is in an industry in which small business concerns owned and controlled by women are substantially underrepresented (as determined by the Administrator) if—

added “(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity;

added “(B) the anticipated award price of the contract (including options) will not exceed—

added “(i) $6,500,000, in the case of a contract opportunity assigned a standard industrial code for manufacturing; or

added “(ii) $4,000,000, in the case of any other contract opportunity; and

added “(C) in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.”

(b)
added Reporting on goals for sole source contracts for small business concerns owned and controlled by women— Clause (viii) of subsection 15(h)(2)(E) of such Act is amended—
(1)
added in subclause (IV), by striking “and” after the semicolon;
(2)
added by redesignating subclause (V) as subclause (VIII); and
(3)
added by inserting after subclause (IV) the following new subclauses:

added “(V) through sole source contracts awarded using the authority under subsection 8(m)(7);

added “(VI) through sole source contracts awarded using the authority under section 8(m)(8);

added “(VII) by industry for contracts described in subclause (III), (IV), (V), or (VI); and”

(c)
added Deadline for report on substantially underrepresented industries accelerated— Paragraph (2) of section 29(o) of such Act is amended by striking “5 years after the date of enactment” and inserting “2 years after the date of enactment”.

Sec. 828 Debarment required of persons convicted of fraudulent use of “made in America” labels

added
(a)
added Debarment required— Subsection (a) of section 2410f of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “the Secretary shall” and all that follows through the period and inserting “the person shall be debarred from contracting with the Department of Defense unless the Secretary waives the debarment under subsection (b).”.
(b)
added Waiver authority and notification requirement— Section 2410f of such title is further amended—
(1)
added by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and
(2)
added by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:

added “(b) Waiver for national security—The Secretary may waive a debarment required by subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that the exercise of such a waiver would be in the national security interests of the United States.

added “(c) Notification—The Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees annually, not later than March 1 of each year, of any exercise of the waiver authority under subsection (b).”

(c)
added Technical amendments— Section 2410f of such title is further amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by inserting ‘“Debarment Required.—” after “(a)”; and
(2)
added in subsection (d), as redesignated by subsection (b), by inserting “Definition.—” before “In this section”.

Sec. 829 Innovative approaches to technology transfer

added

added Section 9(jj) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(jj)) is amended to read as follows:

added “(jj) Innovative approaches to technology transfer

added “(1) Grant program

added “(A) In general—Each Federal agency required by subsection (n) to establish an STTR program shall carry out a grant program to support innovative approaches to technology transfer at institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), nonprofit research institutions and Federal laboratories in order to improve or accelerate the commercialization of federally funded research and technology by small business concerns, including new businesses.

added “(B) Awarding of grants and awards

added “(i) In general—Each Federal agency required by subparagraph (A) to participate in this program, shall award, through a competitive, merit-based process, grants, in the amounts listed in subparagraph (C) to institutions of higher education, technology transfer organizations that facilitate the commercialization of technologies developed by one or more such institutions of higher education, Federal laboratories, other public and private nonprofit entities, and consortia thereof, for initiatives that help identify high-quality, commercially viable federally funded research and technologies and to facilitate and accelerate their transfer into the marketplace.

added “(ii) Use of Funds—Activities supported by grants under this subsection may include—

added “(I) providing early-stage proof of concept funding for translational research;

added “(II) identifying research and technologies at institutions that have the potential for accelerated commercialization;

added “(III) technology maturation funding to support activities such as prototype construction, experiment analysis, product comparison, and collecting performance data;

added “(IV) technical validations, market research, clarifying intellectual property rights position and strategy, and investigating commercial and business opportunities;

added “(V) programs to provide advice, mentoring, entrepreneurial education, project management, and technology and business development expertise to innovators and recipients of technology transfer licenses to maximize commercialization potential; and

added “(VI) conducting outreach to small business concerns as potential licensees of federally funded research and technology, and providing technology transfer services to such small business concerns.

added “(iii) Selection process and applications—Qualifying institutions seeking a grant under this subsection shall submit an application to a Federal agency required by subparagraph (A) to participate in this program at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the agency may require. The application shall include, at a minimum—

added “(I) a description of innovative approaches to technology transfer, technology development, and commercial readiness that have the potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer outcomes and can be adopted by other qualifying institutions, or a demonstration of proven technology transfer and commercialization strategies, or a plan to implement proven technology transfer and commercialization strategies, that can achieve greater commercialization of federally funded research and technologies with program funding;

added “(II) a description of how the qualifying institution will contribute to local and regional economic development efforts; and

added “(III) a plan for sustainability beyond the duration of the funding award.

added “(iv) Program oversight boards

added “(I) In general—Successful proposals shall include a plan to assemble a Program Oversight Board, the members of which shall have technical, scientific, or business expertise three-fifths of whom shall be drawn from industry, start-up companies, venture capital or other equity investment mechanism, technical enterprises, financial institutions, and business development organizations with a track record of success in commercializing innovations. Proposals may use oversight boards in existence on the date of the enactment of the Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 that meet the requirements of this subclause.

added “(II) Program Oversight Boards responsibilities—Program Oversight Boards shall—

added “(aa) establish award programs for individual projects;

added “(bb) provide rigorous evaluation of project applications;

added “(cc) determine which projects should receive awards, in accordance with guidelines established under subparagraph (C)(ii);

added “(dd) establish milestones and associated award amounts for projects that reach milestones;

added “(ee) determine whether awarded projects are reaching milestones; and

added “(ff) develop a process to reallocate outstanding award amounts from projects that are not reaching milestones to other projects with more potential.

added “(III) Conflict of interest—Program Oversight Boards shall be composed of members who do not have a conflict of interest. Boards shall adopt conflict of interest policies to ensure relevant relationships are disclosed and proper recusal procedures are in place.

added “(C) Grant and award amounts

added “(i) Grant amounts—Each Federal agency required by subparagraph (A) to carry out a grant program may make grants up to $3,000,000 to a qualifying institution.

added “(ii) Award amounts—Each qualifying institution that receives a grant under subparagraph (B) shall provide awards for individual projects of not more than $100,000, to be provided in phased amounts, based on reaching the milestones established by the qualifying institution’s Program Oversight Board.

added “(D) Authorized expenditures for Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program

added “(i) Percentage—The percentage of the extramural budget for research, or research and development, each Federal agency required by subsection (n) to establish an STTR program shall expend on the Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program shall be—

added “(I) 0.05 percent for each of fiscal years 2014 and 2015; and

added “(II) 0.1 percent for each of fiscal years 2016 and 2017.

added “(ii) Treatment of expenditures—Any portion of the extramural budget expended by a Federal agency on the Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program shall apply towards the agency’s expenditure requirements under subsection (n).

added “(2) Program evaluation and data collection and dissemination

added “(A) Evaluation plan and data collection—Each Federal agency required by paragraph (1)(A) to establish an Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program shall develop a program evaluation plan and collect annually such information from grantees as is necessary to assess the Program. Program evaluation plans shall require the collection of data aimed at identifying outcomes resulting from the transfer of technology with assistance from the Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program. Such data may include—

added “(i) specific follow-on funding identified or obtained, including follow-on funding sources, such as Federal sources or private sources, within 3 years of the completion of the award;

added “(ii) number of projects which, within 5 years of receiving an award under paragraph (1), result in a license to a start-up company or an established company with sufficient resources for effective commercialization;

added “(iii) the number of invention disclosures received, United States patent applications filed, and United States patents issued within 5 years of the award;

added “(iv) number of projects receiving a grant under paragraph (1) that secure Phase I or Phase II SBIR or STTR awards;

added “(v) available information on revenue, sales or other measures of products that have been commercialized as a result of projects awarded under paragraph (1), within 5 years of the award;

added “(vi) number and location of jobs created resulting from projects awarded under paragraph (1); and

added “(vii) other data as deemed appropriate by a Federal agency required by this subparagraph to develop a program evaluation plan.

added “(B) Evaluative report to congress—The head of each Federal agency that participates in the Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program shall submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate an evaluative report regarding the activities of the program. The report shall include—

added “(i) a detailed description of the implementation of the program;

added “(ii) a detailed description of the grantee selection process;

added “(iii) an accounting of the funds used in the program; and

added “(iv) a summary of the data collected under subparagraph (A).

added “(C) Data dissemination—For the purposes of program transparency and dissemination of best practices, the Administrator shall include on the public database under subsection (k)(1) information on the Innovative Approaches to Technology Transfer Grant Program, including—

added “(i) the program evaluation plan required under subparagraph (A);

added “(ii) a list of recipients by State of awards under paragraph (1); and

added “(iii) information on the use of grants under paragraph (1) by recipient institutions.”

Sec. 830 Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources

added

added Section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) A flag of the United States of America (within the meaning of chapter 1 of title 4).”

Sec. 909 Periodic review of Department of Defense management headquarters

(a)
Plan required— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(b)
Elements of plan— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following for each covered organization:
(1)
A list of the key Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices and management review.
(2)
A description of how current management headquarters are structured to execute the Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements listed under paragraph (1).
(3)
A description of the critical capabilities and skillsets required by management headquarters to execute Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill mission objectives.
(4)
changed An identification and analysis of the factors that directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense of Department of Defense management headquartersheadquarters.
(5)
A description of the proposed timeline and required resources necessary to implement a permanent periodic review and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(c)
Covered organization— In this section, the term “covered organization” includes each of the following:
(1)
The Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(2)
The Joint Staff.
(3)
The Defense Agencies.
(4)
The Department of Defense field activities.
(5)
The headquarters of the combatant commands.
(6)
Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
(7)
The major command headquarters of the Army.
(8)
The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
(9)
The major command headquarters of the Navy and the Marine Corps.
(10)
Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff.
(11)
The major command headquarters of the Air Force.
(12)
The National Guard Bureau.
(d)
Report— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a).
(e)
Amendments— Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”;
(2)
in subparagraph (B), by inserting “, consolidations,” after “through changes”;
(3)
in subparagraph (C)—
(A)
by inserting “, consolidations,” after “through changes”; and
(B)
by inserting “, or other associated cost drivers, including a discussion of how the changes, consolidations, or reductions were prioritized,” after “programs and offices”;
(4)
in subparagraph (E), by inserting “, including the risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing, such modifications” before the period; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

“(F) A description of how the plan supports or affects current Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices and management review.

“(G) A description of the associated costs specifically addressed by the savings.”

Sec. 910 Report related to nuclear forces, deterrence, nonproliferation, and terrorism

added

added Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report discussing how the Department of Defense will manage its mission with respect to issues related to nuclear forces, deterrence, nonproliferation, and terrorism.

Sec. 911 Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management, functional, and technical workforce of the Department of Defense

(a)
Senior management workforce— Subsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

“(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall—

“(A) include a separate chapter to specifically address the shaping and improvement of the senior management workforce of the Department of Defense; and

“(B) include an assessment of the senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the appropriate functional community.”

(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “such senior management, functional, and technical workforce” and inserting “such senior management workforce and such senior functional and technical workforce”.
(b)
Highly qualified experts— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(2), by striking “subsection (f)(1)” in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting “subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2)”;
(2)
by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and
(3)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

“(f) Highly qualified experts

“(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of the Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the “HQE workforce”).

“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce—

“(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and other attrition;

“(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such strategies;

“(C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE personnel;

“(D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and

“(E) any legislative changes that may be necessary to achieve HQE workforce goals.”

(c)
Definitions— Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as follows:

“(h) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) The term “senior management workforce of the Department of Defense” includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5.

“(B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service under section 1606 of this title.

“(2) The term “senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense” includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

“(A) Persons serving in positions described in section 5376(a) of title 5.

changed “(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A-315)).1654A–315)).

“(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).

“(D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level positions under section 1607 of this title.

“(3) The term “acquisition workforce” includes individuals designated under section 1721 of this title as filling acquisition positions.”

(d)
Conforming amendment— The heading of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: “Senior Management Workforce; Senior Functional and Technical Workforce.—”.

Sec. 924 Public release by Inspectors General of reports of misconduct

added
(a)
added Release of inspector general of the Department of Defense administrative misconduct reports— Section 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c)

added “(1) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of any member of the Senior Executive Service, political appointee, or commissioned officer in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 or above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.

added “(2) In this subsection, the term “political appointee” means any individual who is—

added “(A) employed in a position described under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States Code, (relating to the Executive Schedule);

added “(B) a limited term appointee, limited emergency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Senior Executive Service, as defined under paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively, of section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code; or

added “(C) employed in a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

(b)
added Release of inspector general of the army administrative misconduct reports— Section 3020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f)

added “(1) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Army shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of any member of the Senior Executive Service, political appointee, or commissioned officer in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 or above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.

added “(2) In this subsection, the term “political appointee” means any individual who is—

added “(A) employed in a position described under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States Code, (relating to the Executive Schedule);

added “(B) a limited term appointee, limited emergency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Senior Executive Service, as defined under paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively, of section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code; or

added “(C) employed in a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

(c)
added Release of Naval inspector general administrative misconduct reports— Section 5020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e)

added “(1) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Naval Inspector General shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of any member of the Senior Executive Service, political appointee, or commissioned officer in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 or above. In releasing the reports, the Naval Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.

added “(2) In this subsection, the term “political appointee” means any individual who is—

added “(A) employed in a position described under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States Code, (relating to the Executive Schedule);

added “(B) a limited term appointee, limited emergency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Senior Executive Service, as defined under paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively, of section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code; or

added “(C) employed in a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

(d)
added Release of inspector general of the air force administrative misconduct reports— Section 8020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(f)

added “(1) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Air Force shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of any member of the Senior Executive Service, political appointee, or commissioned officer in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 or above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.

added “(2) In this subsection, the term “political appointee” means any individual who is—

added “(A) employed in a position described under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States Code, (relating to the Executive Schedule);

added “(B) a limited term appointee, limited emergency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the Senior Executive Service, as defined under paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively, of section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code; or

added “(C) employed in a position of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

Sec. 925 Modifications to requirements for accounting for members of the armed forces and Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing

added
(a)
added Designation of officer— Section 1501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added in the subsection heading, by striking “Personnel” and inserting “Persons”;
(2)
added by striking paragraph (2);
(3)
added by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); and
(4)
added by striking the first sentence of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

added “(A) The Secretary of Defense shall designate a single organization within the Department of Defense to have responsibility for Department of Defense matters relating to missing persons, including accounting for missing persons and persons whose remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost.

added “(B) The organization designated under this paragraph shall be a Defense Agency or other entity of the Department of Defense outside the military departments and is referred to in this chapter as the “designated Defense Agency”.

added “(C) The head of the organization designated under this paragraph is referred to in this chapter as the “designated Agency Director”.”

(b)
added Responsibilities— Paragraph (2) of such section, as designated by subsection (a)(3), is amended—
(1)
added in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “the official designated under this paragraph shall include—” and inserting “the designated Agency Director shall include the following:”;
(2)
added by capitalizing the first letter of the first word of each of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D);
(3)
added by striking the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (A) and inserting a period;
(4)
added in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
added by inserting “responsibility for” after “as well as the”; and
(B)
added by striking “; and” at the end and inserting a period; and
(5)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(E) The establishment of a means for communication between officials of the designated Defense Agency and family members of missing persons, veterans service organizations, concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s efforts to account for missing persons, including a readily available means for communication of their views and recommendations to the designated Agency Director.”

(c)
added Conforming amendments— Such section is further amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (3), by striking “the official designated under paragraphs (1) and (2)” and inserting “the designated Agency Director”; and
(2)
added in paragraphs (4) and (5), by striking “The designated official” and inserting “The designated Agency Director”.
(d)
added Resources— Such section is further amended by striking paragraph (6).
(e)
added Public-private partnerships and other forms of support— Chapter 76 of such title is amended by inserting after section 1501 the following new section:

added “1501a. Public-private partnerships; other forms of support

added “(a) Public-private partnerships—The Secretary of Defense may enter into arrangements known as public-private partnerships with appropriate entities outside the Government for the purposes of facilitating the activities of the designated Defense Agency. The Secretary may only partner with foreign governments or foreign entities with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. Any such arrangement shall be entered into in accordance with authorities provided under this section or any other authority otherwise available to the Secretary. Regulations prescribed under subsection (e)(1) shall include provisions for the establishment and implementation of such partnerships.

added “(b) Acceptance of voluntary personal services—The Secretary of Defense may accept voluntary services to facilitate accounting for missing persons in the same manner as the Secretary of a military department may accept such services under section 1588(a)(9) of this title.

added “(c) Solicitation of gifts—Under regulations prescribed under this chapter, the Secretary may solicit from any person or public or private entity, for the use and benefit of the activities of the designated Defense Agency, a gift of information and data, books, manuscripts, other documents, and artifacts.

added “(d) Use of Department of Defense personal property—The Secretary may allow a private entity to use, at no cost, personal property of the Department of Defense to assist the entity in supporting the activities of the designated Defense Agency.

added “(e) Regulations

added “(1) In general—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to implement this section.

added “(2) Limitation—Such regulations shall provide that solicitation of a gift, acceptance of a gift (including a gift of services), or use of a gift under this section may not occur if the nature or circumstances of the solicitation, acceptance, or use would compromise the integrity, or the appearance of integrity, of any program of the Department of Defense or any individual involved in such program.”

(f)
added Section 1505 conforming amendments— Section 1505(c) of such title is amended—
(1)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “the designated Agency Director”; and
(2)
added in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking “head of the office established under section 1501 of this title” and inserting “designated Agency Director”.
(g)
added Section 1509 amendments— Section 1509 of such title is amended—
(1)
added by striking “preenactment” in the section heading;
(2)
added in subsection (b)—
(A)
added in the subsection heading, by striking “Process”;
(B)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “POW/MIA accounting community” and inserting “through the designated Agency Director”;
(C)
added by striking paragraph (2); and
(D)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):

added “(2)

added “(A) The Secretary shall assign or detail to the designated Defense Agency on a full-time basis a senior medical examiner from the personnel of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System. The primary duties of the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall include the identification of remains in support of the function of the designated Agency Director to account for unaccounted for persons covered by subsection (a).

added “(B) In carrying out functions under this chapter, the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall report to the designated Agency Director.

added “(C) The medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall—

added “(i) exercise scientific identification authority;

added “(ii) establish identification and laboratory policy consistent with the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System; and

added “(iii) advise the designated Agency Director on forensic science disciplines.

added “(D) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted as affecting the authority of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.”

(3)
added in subsection (d)—
(A)
added by inserting “; Centralized Database” in the subsection heading after “Files”; and
(B)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a single centralized database and case management system containing information on all missing persons for whom a file has been established under this subsection. The database and case management system shall be accessible to all elements of the Department of Defense involved in the search, recovery, identification, and communications phases of the program established by this section.”

(4)
added in subsection (f)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1)—
(i)
added by striking “establishing and”; and
(ii)
added by striking “Secretary of Defense shall coordinate” and inserting “designated Agency Director shall ensure coordination”;
(B)
added in paragraph (2)—
(i)
added by inserting “staff” after “National Security Council”; and
(ii)
added by striking “POW/MIA accounting community”; and
(C)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) In carrying out the program, the designated Agency Director shall coordinate all external communications and events associated with the program.”

(h)
added Technical and conforming amendments—
(1)
added Cross-reference correction— Section 1513(1) of such title is amended by striking “subsection (b)” in the last sentence and inserting “subsection (c)”.
(2)
added Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 76 of such title is amended—
(A)
added by inserting after the item relating to section 1501 the following new item:
(B)
added in the item relating to section 1509, by striking “preenactment”.

Sec. 1005 Report on auditable financial statements

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report ranking all military departments and Defense Agencies in order of how advanced they are in achieving auditable financial statements as required by law. The report should not include information otherwise available in other reports to Congress.

Sec. 1006 Report on implementing audit reporting requirements

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the barriers to implementing audit reporting requirements contained in section 1003 of Public Law 111–84 and recommendations to ensure reporting deadlines are met.

Sec. 1027 Prohibition on use of funds for certain permitting activities under the Sunken Military Craft Act

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to issue a regulation for permitting activities set forth in section 1403 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2907; 10 U.S.C. 113 note).

Sec. 1034 Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be used to provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Sec. 1045 Certification and limitation on availability of funds for aviation foreign internal defense program

(a)
Certification—
(1)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification regarding the aviation foreign internal defense program that includes each of the following:
(A)
An overall description of the program, included validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant commands and the Joint Staff, and statutory authorities used to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal defense programs within the Department of Defense.
(B)
Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success, and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance costs across the Future Years Defense Program.
(C)
A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying contributing commands and units for program execution, including the use of Air Force, Special Operations Command, Reserve, and National Guard forces and components.
(D)
The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the aviation foreign internal defense program.
(E)
Any other items the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(2)
Form— The certification required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(b)
Limitations—
(1)
changed Limitations on the use of funds— None Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended to support the aviation foreign internal defense program, or to retire, transfer, or divest any asset of such program, until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees the certification required under subsection (a).
(2)
changed Limitation on disposition of aircraft— No aircraft that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is part of the aviation foreign internal defense program may be transferred into or maintained in a status that is considered excess to the requirements of the possessing command and awaiting disposition instructions.instructions until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary delivers the certification required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense committees.

Sec. 1048 Prohibition on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base until completion of assessments by Secretary of Defense and Government Accountability Office

The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, Portugal, below the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013, until 30 days after the following occur:

(1)
changed The Secretary of Defense concludes the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary on January 25, 2013. Such assessment shall address the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base modifying its United States Air Force mission to support a permanent force structure for the United States Special Operations Command, the United States Africa Command, and other overseas United States forces in both the European and African regions, at a force structure at or above the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013.
(2)
changed The Secretary briefs of Defense includes in the congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment, including a specific assessment Assessment under paragraph (1) an analysis of how, with respect to the efficacy use and force structure of the Lajes Air Force Base in supporting Base, the United States overseas is honoring the goals of the U.S.-Portugal Permanent Bilateral Commission, particularly how the systematic reduction in force posture.structure at such Air Force Base is within the goals of the commission and the bilateral cooperation between the 2 countries in the fight against terrorism.
(3)
changed The Comptroller General of Secretary briefs the United States reviews and validates congressional defense committees regarding the results of such Assessment and conducts an independent assessment of the possible operational capabilities of Lajes Air Force Base.Assessment under paragraph (1).

Sec. 1050 Conditions on Army National Guard and active Army force structure changes pending Comptroller General report

(a)
Certain reductions prohibited— During fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not carry out any of the following actions:
(1)
Reduce the end strength for active duty personnel of the Army for a fiscal year below 490,000.
(2)
Reduce the end strength for Selected Reserve personnel of the Army National Guard of the United States for a fiscal year below 350,000.
(3)
changed Transfer AH-64 AH–64 Attack helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.
(b)
Report required— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a review of the analyses of any counter-proposals submitted to the Army by the Chief of the National Guard and conducted by the Army and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment Program Evaluation Office as the basis for the decision to determine the future force structure of the Army, including the appropriate mix between regular Army, the National Guard, and the Army Reserve.
(c)
Elements of report— The report required by subsection (b) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
An assessment of the force structure model used to conduct the analysis and determination of whether proper assumptions were made based on the current budget program, the National Military Strategy, and Combatant Commanders’ operational requirements for the Army.
(2)
An assessment of the cost analysis models used to make the determinations regarding which Army aviation platforms should be retained and in which component, including the projected costs and savings associated with the determinations.
(3)
A comparison of the operational readiness rates for the past five years for the equipment platforms that comprise aviation brigades of the regular Army and the Army National Guard.
(4)
An assessment of the manning levels required for combat aviation brigades in the regular Army and the Army National Guard, including whether the resources to fund full-time support of military technicians was properly applied to fill the authorized positions in States with aviation brigades.
(d)
No limitation on aviation training— Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed—
(1)
to limit the provision of qualification training for military occupational specialties related to Army Aviation; or
(2)
to prevent the Secretary of the Army from continuing flight training and advanced qualification courses for selected National Guard AH-64 personnel in accordance with current force structure and Army readiness requirements.
(e)
Sense of Congress regarding additional funding for the Army National Guard— Congress is concerned with the planned reductions and realignments the Army has proposed with respect to aviation realignment of combat aviation aircraft in the Army National Guard as well as greater reductions in active component end strength and brigade combat teams.

Sec. 1051 Modifications to OH–58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters

added
(a)
added In general— Notwithstanding section 2244A of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may implement engineering change proposals on OH–58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters.
(b)
added Manner of modifications— The Secretary shall carry out subsection (a) in a manner that ensures—
(1)
added the safety and survivability of the crews of the OH–58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters by expeditiously replacing or integrating, or both, the mast-mounted sight engineering change proposals to the current OH–58D fleet;
(2)
added the safety of flight; and
(3)
added that the minimum requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands are met.
(c)
added Engineering change proposals defined— In this section, the term “engineering change proposals” means, with respect to OH–58D helicopters, engineering changes relating to the following:
(1)
added Mast mounted sight laser pointer.
(2)
added Two-card system processor.
(3)
added Diode pump laser.

Sec. 1052 Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens

added
(a)
added Prohibition— No officer or employee of, or detailee or contractor to, the Department of Defense may use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States.
(b)
added Exception— The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to the use of a drone to kill an individual who is actively engaged in combat against the United States.
(c)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to create any authority, or expand any existing authority, for the Federal Government to kill any person.
(d)
added Drone defined— In this section, the term “drone” means an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)).

Sec. 1064 Study on joint analytic capability of the Department of Defense

(a)
Independent assessment— The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent assessment of the joint analytic capabilities of the Department of Defense to support strategy, plans, and force development and their link to resource decisions.
(b)
Conduct of assessment— The assessment required by subsection (a) may, at the election of the Secretary, be conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, and has recognized credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs appropriate for the assessment.
(c)
Elements— The assessment required by subsection (a) should include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1)
An assessment of the analytical capability of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff to support force planning, defense strategy development, program and budget decisions, and the review of war plans.
(2)
changed Recommendations on improvements to such capability as required, including changes to processes or organizations that may be necessarynecessary.
(d)
Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Sec. 1065 Business case analysis of the creation of an active duty association for the 68th Air Refueling Wing

added
(a)
added Business case analysis— The Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a business case analysis of the creation of a 4–PAA (Personnel-Only) KC–135R active association with the 168th Air Refueling Wing. Such analysis shall include consideration of—
(1)
added any efficiencies or cost savings achieved assuming the 168th Air Refueling Wing meets 100 percent of current air refueling requirements after the active association is in place;
(2)
added improvements to the mission requirements of the 168th Air Refueling Wing and Air Mobility Command; and
(3)
added effects on the operations of Air Mobility Command.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the business case analysis conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 1066 Report on long-term costs of operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

added
(a)
added Report requirement— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, with contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to Congress a report containing an estimate of previous costs of Operation New Dawn (the successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom) and the long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom for a scenario, determined by the President and based on current contingency operation and withdrawal plans, that takes into account expected force levels and the expected length of time that members of the Armed Forces will be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(b)
added Estimates to be used in preparation of report— In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the President shall make estimates and projections through at least fiscal year 2024, adjust any dollar amounts appropriately for inflation, and take into account and specify each of the following:
(1)
added The total number of members of the Armed Forces expected to be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including—
(A)
added the number of members of the Armed Forces actually deployed in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Enduring Freedom;
(B)
added the number of members of reserve components of the Armed Forces called or ordered to active duty in the United States for the purpose of training for eventual deployment in Southwest Asia, backfilling for deployed troops, or supporting other Department of Defense missions directly or indirectly related to Operation Enduring Freedom; and
(C)
added the break-down of deployments of members of the regular and reserve components and activation of members of the reserve components.
(2)
added The number of members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who have previously served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom and who are expected to serve multiple deployments.
(3)
added The number of contractors and private military security firms that have been used and are expected to be used during the course of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(4)
added The number of veterans currently suffering and expected to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental injuries.
(5)
added The number of veterans currently in need of and expected to be in need of prosthetic care and treatment because of amputations incurred during service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(6)
added The current number of pending Department of Veterans Affairs claims from veterans of military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the total number of such veterans expected to seek disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(7)
added The total number of members of the Armed Forces who have been killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties, the total number of members expected to suffer injuries in Afghanistan, and the total number of members expected to be killed in Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties.
(8)
added The amount of funds previously appropriated for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the Department of Veterans Affairs for costs related to Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, including an account of the amount of funding from regular Department of Defense, Department of State, and Department of Veterans Affairs budgets that has gone and will go to costs associated with such operations.
(9)
added Previous, current, and future operational expenditures associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and, when applicable, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn, including—
(A)
added funding for combat operations;
(B)
added deploying, transporting, feeding, and housing members of the Armed Forces (including fuel costs);
(C)
added activation and deployment of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces;
(D)
added equipping and training of Iraqi and Afghani forces;
(E)
added purchasing, upgrading, and repairing weapons, munitions, and other equipment consumed or used in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom; and
(F)
added payments to other countries for logistical assistance in support of such operations.
(10)
added Past, current, and future costs of entering into contracts with private military security firms and other contractors for the provision of goods and services associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(11)
added Average annual cost for each member of the Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including room and board, equipment and body armor, transportation of troops and equipment (including fuel costs), and operational costs.
(12)
added Current and future cost of combat-related special pays and benefits, including reenlistment bonuses.
(13)
added Current and future cost of calling or ordering members of the reserve components to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(14)
added Current and future cost for reconstruction, embassy operations and construction, and foreign aid programs for Iraq and Afghanistan.
(15)
added Current and future cost of bases and other infrastructure to support members of the Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan.
(16)
added Current and future cost of providing health care for veterans who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom, including—
(A)
added the cost of mental health treatment for veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, and other mental problems as a result of such service; and
(B)
added the cost of lifetime prosthetics care and treatment for veterans suffering from amputations as a result of such service.
(17)
added Current and future cost of providing Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits for the lifetime of veterans who incur disabilities while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(18)
added Current and future cost of providing survivors’ benefits to survivors of members of the Armed Forces killed while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(19)
added Cost of bringing members of the Armed Forces and equipment back to the United States upon the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom, including the cost of demobilization, transportation costs (including fuel costs), providing transition services for members of the Armed Forces transitioning from active duty to veteran status, transporting equipment, weapons, and munitions (including fuel costs), and an estimate of the value of equipment that will be left behind.
(20)
added Cost to restore the military and military equipment, including the equipment of the reserve components, to full strength after the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(21)
added Amount of money borrowed to pay for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, and the sources of that money.
(22)
added Interest on money borrowed, including interest for money already borrowed and anticipated interest payments on future borrowing, for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.

Sec. 1067 Report on force structure laydown of tactical airlift assets

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the strategic laydown of tactical airlift forces following the withdrawal of combat forces from Afghanistan is cause for concern.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the five-year plan of the Secretary for the force structure laydown of the tactical airlift.
(c)
added Limitation; report— The Secretary of the Air Force shall brief the congressional defense committees prior to implementing any movements.

Sec. 1068 Report on thermal injury prevention

added

added The Director of the United States Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report addressing thermal injury prevention needs to improve occupant centric survivability systems for combat and tactical vehicles against over matching ballistic threat.

Sec. 1072 Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities

Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
changed in paragraph (1)(A), by striking “counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities” and inserting “counterdrug, counterterrorism, and border security activities”activities”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy” and inserting “the Attorney General, the Director of National Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate.”; and
(2)
in subsection (d), by striking “counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities” and inserting “counterdrug, counterterrorism, or border security activities”.

Sec. 1073 Revision to statute of limitations for aviation insurance claims

(a)
In general— Section 44309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
changed in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “A civil action shall not be instituted against the United States under this chapter unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim is sent by certified or registered mail.”.mail.”; and
(2)
by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Time requirements

“(1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation within two years after the date on which the loss event occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.

“(2)

“(A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim made under the authority of this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than the earlier of—

“(i) the date that is 60 days after the date on which final judgment is entered by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction; or

“(ii) the date that is six years after the date on which the loss event occurred.

“(B) Any civil action arising out of the denial of such claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.

“(3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6 months after the date on which the claim is presented to the Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement with the claimant when there is good cause for an agreement.”

(b)
Applicability— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a claim arising after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1075 Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace

(a)
changed Memoranda of understanding— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is either engaged in the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) note), or participating in the Robotic Aircraft for Public Safety program or other activities of similar nature conducted by the Department of Homeland Security, to allow such entity to access nonregulatory special use airspace if such access—
(1)
changed is used by the entity as part of such test range a program; and
(2)
does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Established procedures— The Secretary shall carry out subsection (a) using the established procedures of the Department of Defense with respect to entering into a memorandum of understanding.
(c)
changed Construction— A memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team member of such entity in the test range program specified in such subsection.
(d)
added UAS test range clarification— For purposes of this section, the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) shall include test ranges selected by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and any additional test range not initially selected by the Administration if such range enters into a partnership or agreement with a selected test range.

Sec. 1076 Sense of Congress on the life and achievements of Dr. James R. Schlesinger

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger was born in New York, New York, on February 15, 1929, graduated summa cum laude from Harvard College in 1950 where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa and awarded the Frederick Sheldon Travel Fellowship, and subsequently received from Harvard University his master’s degree in 1952 and doctoral degree in 1956.
(2)
Dr. Schlesinger married Rachel Line Mellinger in 1954 and had eight children with her before she passed away in 1995.
(3)
Dr. Schlesinger is survived by his children Cora Schlesinger, Charles Schlesinger, Ann Schlesinger, William Schlesinger, Emily Schlesinger, Thomas Schlesinger, Clara Schlesinger, and James Schlesinger, Jr., and eleven grandchildren.
(4)
Dr. Schlesinger was a generous patron of the arts, including helping significantly to establish the Rachel M. Schlesinger Concert Hall and Arts Center in Arlington, Virginia.
(5)
Dr. Schlesinger was a generous sponsor of higher education, serving on the International Council at Harvard University’s Belfer Center, endowing the Julius Schlesinger Professorship of Operations Management at New York University’s Stern School of Business and the James R. Schlesinger Distinguished Professorship at the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, and sponsoring an ongoing music scholarship at Harvard College in honor of his beloved wife.
(6)
Dr. Schlesinger was a distinguished statesman-scholar of great integrity, intellect, and insight who dedicated his life to protecting the security of the United States and Western civilization and the liberty of all the people of the United States throughout his highly-decorated and distinguished career spanning seven decades—
(A)
serving as a professor of economics at the University of Virginia from 1955 until 1963;
(B)
authoring numerous important scholarly and policy-related publications, including The Political Economy of National Security: A Study of the Economic Aspect of the Contemporary Power Struggle (1960), Defense Planning and Budgeting: The Issue of Centralized Control (1968), American Security and Energy Policy (1980), America at Century’s End (1989), and most recently, Minimum Deterrence: Examining the Evidence (2013);
(C)
serving at the RAND Corporation from 1963 until 1969, including as the director of strategic studies;
(D)
beginning service in the Federal Government in 1969, leading on defense matters as the assistant director and acting deputy director of the United States Bureau of the Budget;
(E)
serving as a member and chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission from 1971 until 1973, working tirelessly to introduce extensive organization and management changes to strengthen the regulatory performance of the Commission;
(F)
serving as Director of Central Intelligence in 1973, focusing on the agency’s adherence to its legislative charter; and
(G)
becoming the Secretary of Defense in 1973 at age 44, a position Dr. Schlesinger held until 1975, during which time he—
(i)
authored the “Schlesinger Doctrine” that instituted important reforms to strengthen the flexibility and credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent to prevent war, assure United States allies, and protect the liberties all Americans enjoy; ensuring that the United States maintained “essential equivalence” with the Soviet Union’s conventional military forces and surging nuclear capabilities;
(ii)
changed lead the successful development of the A-10 A–10 close-air support aircraft and the F-16 F–16 fighter; leading the Department of Defense with great skill and prescience during the 1973 Yom Kippur War in which he was key to the United States airlift that, according to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, “meant life for our people”;
(iii)
changed led the Department of Defense during the 1974 Cyprus Crisis, the closing phase of the Indochina conflict, and the 1975 Mayaguez incident in which his actions helped save the lives of captured Americans,Americans; and
(iv)
consulted regularly with and was highly-regarded by the uniformed military; and working tenaciously to strengthen the morale of the military following the United States withdrawal from Vietnam and to stem the defense budget cuts in that challenging period.
(7)
In light of his realistic views of the Soviet Union’s power and intentions, Dr. Schlesinger was invited to China as a private citizen in 1975 at the personal request of Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, and upon Mao’s death, was the only foreigner invited by the Chinese leadership to lay a wreath at Mao’s bier.
(8)
In 1976, President-elect Jimmy Carter invited Dr. Schlesinger to serve as his special advisor on energy during the difficult period of oil embargoes and fuel shortages to establish a national energy policy and create the charter for the Department of Energy and subsequently to serve President Carter as the first Secretary of Energy, successfully initiating new conservation standards, gradual oil and natural gas deregulation, and unifying the nation’s approach to energy policy with national security considerations.
(9)
Following his return to private life in 1979, Dr. Schlesinger continued serving tirelessly to the end of his life in a wide array of public service and civic positions, including as a member of President Ronald Reagan’s Commission on Strategic Forces, a member of Virginia Governor Charles Robb’s Commission on Virginia’s Future, Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Mitre Corporation, a member of the Defense Policy Board and co-chair of studies for the Defense Science Board, Chairman of the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Board, a Director of Sandia Corporation, a Trustee of the Atlantic Council, Nixon Center, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, and an original member of the Secretary of State’s International Security Advisory Board.
(10)
In the recent past, Dr. Schlesinger was appointed by President George W. Bush to the Homeland Security Advisory Board, invited by Secretary Robert Gates to lead the “Schlesinger Task Force” to recommend measures to ensure the highest levels of competence and control of the Nation’s nuclear forces, and invited by Congress to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States to produce the 2009 study, entitled “America’s Strategic Posture”, which served as the blueprint for the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review of the Department of Defense.
(11)
In addition to Dr. Schlesinger’s earned doctorate from Harvard University, he was awarded 13 honorary doctorates, and was the recipient of numerous prestigious medals and awards, including inter alia, the National Security Medal presented by President Carter, the Defense Science Board’s Eugene G. Fubini Award, the United States Army Association’s George Catlett Marshall Medal, the Air Force Association’s H. H. Arnold Award, the Navy League’s National Meritorious Citation, the Society of Experimental Test Pilots’ James H. Doolittle Award, the Military Order of World Wars’ Distinguished Service Medal, the Air Force Association’s Lifetime Achievement Award, and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation’s Henry M. Jackson Award for Distinguished Public Service.
(12)
Dr. Schlesinger’s monumental contributions to the security and liberty of the nation and Western civilization, and to the betterment of his local community should serve as an example to all people of the United States.
(b)
Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
has learned with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy, and Director of Central Intelligence;
(2)
honors the legacy of Dr. Schlesinger’s commitment to the liberty and security of this Nation and the Western community of nations, the betterment of his local community, and his loving family;
(3)
extends its deepest condolences and sympathy to the family, friends, and colleagues of Dr. Schlesinger who have lost a beloved father, grandfather, and thoughtful leader;
(4)
honors Dr. Schlesinger’s wisdom, discernment, scholarship, and dedication to a life of public service that greatly benefitted his community, country, and Western civilization;
(5)
recognizes with great appreciation that while serving as public servant under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter, Dr. Schlesinger contributed significantly, thoughtfully, and directly to the betterment of United States policies and practices in the areas of national defense, energy, and intelligence;
(6)
recognizes with great appreciation that after returning to private life, Dr. Schlesinger continued to serve the Nation selflessly until his passing through his numerous bipartisan contributions to the reasoned public discourse of issues and his leadership on numerous high-level studies sponsored by the White House, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the United States Congress;
(7)
recognizes with great appreciation Dr. Schlesinger’s exemplary life guided by his commitment to the continuing security and liberty of the United States, and by his honor, duty, and devotion to country and family, scholarship, and personal moral integrity; and
(8)
expresses profound respect and admiration for Dr. Schlesinger and his exemplary legacy of commitment to the people of the United States, members of the Armed Forces, and all those who help safeguard the Nation.

Sec. 1080 Enhancing presence and capabilities and readiness posture of United States military in Europe

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan that—

(1)
identifies the capabilities and capacities, including with respect to cyber, special operations, and intelligence, required by the Armed Forces of the United States to counter or mitigate conventional, unconventional, and subversive activities of the Russian Federation within the area of responsibility of the United States European Command;
(2)
identifies the required capabilities and capacities needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to meet operations plan requirements for a response under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty;
(3)
identifies any deficiencies in the readiness of the Armed Forces of the United States in the area of the responsibility of the United States European Command; and
(4)
changed recommends actions, resources, and timelines with respect to correcting any deficiency identified under paragraphs paragraph (1), (2), or (3).

Sec. 1081 Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by the Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States

(a)
Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary— In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
determine the cost of the transportation provided with respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
(2)
not later than 10 days after completion of the trip involved, provide a written statement of the cost—
(A)
changed to the Member, officer, or employee involved, involved; and
(B)
to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
(3)
upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary’s official public website until the expiration of the 4-year period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
(b)
Exceptions— This section does not apply with respect to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Member— The term Member, with respect to the House of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
(2)
United States— The term United States means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(d)
Effective Date— This section shall apply with respect to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to any trip which began prior to such date.

Sec. 1082 Improvement of financial literacy

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a training program to increase and improve financial literacy training for incoming and outgoing military personnel.
(b)
added Funding—
(1)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for each military department (including the Marine Corps) is hereby increased by $2,500,000.
(2)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D—
(A)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, is hereby reduced by $5,000,000; and
(B)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in division C for weapons activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4701, for the B61 life extension program and the W76 life extension program are each hereby reduced by $2,500,000.

Sec. 1083 Report on certain information technology systems and technology and critical national security infrastructure

added
(a)
added Notification required— The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall each submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification of each instance in which the Secretary or the Director determine through analysis or reporting that an information technology or telecommunications component from a company suspected of being influenced by a foreign country, or a suspected affiliate of such a company, is competing for or has been awarded a contract to include the technology of such company or such affiliate into a covered network.
(b)
added Time of notification— Each notification required under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary or the Director makes a determination described in such subsection.
(c)
added Elements of notification— Each notification submitted under subsection (a) shall include—
(1)
added a description of the instance described in subsection (a), including an identification of the company of interest and the covered network affected;
(2)
added an analysis of the potential risks and the actions that can be taken to mitigate such risks; and
(3)
added a description of any follow up or other response actions to be taken.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees;
(B)
added the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
(C)
added the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2)
added Covered network— The term “covered network” includes—
(A)
added information technology or telecommunications networks of the Department of Defense or the intelligence community; and
(B)
added information technology or telecommunications networks of network operators supporting systems in proximity to Department of Defense or intelligence community facilities.
(3)
added Intelligence community— The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).

Sec. 1084 Annual report on performance of regional offices of the Department of Veterans Affairs

added

added Section 7734 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added in the first sentence, by inserting before the period the following: “and on the performance of any regional office that fails to meet its administrative goals”;
(2)
added in paragraph (2), by striking “and”;
(3)
added by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
(4)
added by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):

added “(3) in the case of any regional office that, for the year covered by the report, did not meet the administrative goal of no claim pending for more than 125 days and an accuracy rating of 98 percent—

added “(A) a signed statement prepared by the individual serving as director of the regional office as of the date of the submittal of the report containing—

added “(i) an explanation for why the regional office did not meet the goal;

added “(ii) a description of the additional resources needed to enable the regional office to reach the goal; and

added “(iii) a description of any additional actions planned for the subsequent year that are proposed to enable the regional office to meet the goal; and

added “(B) a statement prepared by the Under Secretary for Benefits explaining how the failure of the regional office to meet the goal affected the performance evaluation of the director of the regional office; and”

Sec. 1085 Sense of Congress regarding the transfer of used military equipment to Federal, State, and local agencies

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should make every reasonable effort, by not later than one year after the date on which a piece of eligible equipment returns to the United States, to transfer such eligible equipment to a Federal, State, or local agency in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of section 2576a of title 10, United States Code.
(b)
added Preference— In considering applications for the transfer of eligible equipment under section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may give a preference to Federal, State, and local agencies that plan to use such eligible equipment primarily for the purpose of strengthening border security along the international border between the United States and Mexico.
(c)
added Eligible equipment— For purposes of this section, the term “eligible equipment” means equipment of the Department of Defense that—
(1)
added was used in Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn;
(2)
added the Secretary of Defense determines would be suitable for use by a Federal, State, or local agency in law enforcement activities, including—
(A)
added intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance equipment;
(B)
added night-vision goggles; and
(C)
added tactical wheeled vehicles; and
(3)
added the Secretary determines is excess to military requirements.

Sec. 1086 Methods for validating certain service considered to be active service by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

added
(a)
added In general— For the purposes of verifying that an individual performed service under honorable conditions that satisfies the requirements of a coastwise merchant seaman who is recognized pursuant to section 401 of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (Public Law 95–202; 38 U.S.C. 106 note) as having performed active duty service for the purposes described in subsection (c)(1), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall accept the following:
(1)
added In the case of an individual who served on a coastwise merchant vessel seeking such recognition for whom no applicable Coast Guard shipping or discharge form, ship logbook, merchant mariner’s document or Z-card, or other official employment record is available, the Secretary shall provide such recognition on the basis of applicable Social Security Administration records submitted for or by the individual, together with validated testimony given by the individual or the primary next of kin of the individual that the individual performed such service during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on December 31, 1946.
(2)
added In the case of an individual who served on a coastwise merchant vessel seeking such recognition for whom the applicable Coast Guard shipping or discharge form, ship logbook, merchant mariner’s document or Z-card, or other official employment record has been destroyed or otherwise become unavailable by reason of any action committed by a person responsible for the control and maintenance of such form, logbook, or record, the Secretary shall accept other official documentation demonstrating that the individual performed such service during period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on December 31, 1946.
(3)
added For the purpose of determining whether to recognize service allegedly performed during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on December 31, 1946, the Secretary shall recognize masters of seagoing vessels or other officers in command of similarly organized groups as agents of the United States who were authorized to document any individual for purposes of hiring the individual to perform service in the merchant marine or discharging an individual from such service.
(b)
added Treatment of other documentation— Other documentation accepted by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to subsection (a)(2) shall satisfy all requirements for eligibility of service during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on December 31, 1946.
(c)
added Benefits allowed—
(1)
added Burial benefits eligibility— Service of an individual that is considered active duty pursuant to subsection (a) shall be considered as active duty service with respect to providing burial benefits under chapters 23 and 24 of title 38, United States Code, to the individual.
(2)
added Medals, ribbons, and decorations— An individual whose service is recognized as active duty pursuant to subsection (a) may be awarded an appropriate medal, ribbon, or other military decoration based on such service.
(3)
added Status of veteran— An individual whose service is recognized as active duty pursuant to subsection (a) shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be entitled by reason of such recognized service to any benefit that is not described in this subsection.
(d)
added Determination of coastwise merchant seaman— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall verify that an individual performed service under honorable conditions that satisfies the requirements of a coastwise merchant seaman pursuant to this section without regard to the sex, age, or disability of the individual during the period in which the individual served as such a coastwise merchant seaman.
(e)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “coastwise merchant seaman” means a mariner that served on a tug boat, towboat, or seagoing barge that transported war materials to and from ports located in the territorial seas of the United States in support of the war effort during the period beginning December 7, 1941, and ending December 31, 1946.
(2)
added The term primary next of kin with respect to an individual seeking recognition for service under this section means the closest living relative of the individual who was alive during the period of such service.
(f)
added Effective date— This section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1087 Cost of wars

added

added The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Sec. 1088 Observance of Veterans Day

added
(a)
added Two minutes of silence— Chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “145. Veterans Day

added “The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of veterans throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at—

added “(1) 3:11 p.m. Atlantic standard time;

added “(2) 2:11 p.m. eastern standard time;

added “(3) 1:11 p.m. central standard time;

added “(4) 12:11 p.m. mountain standard time;

added “(5) 11:11 a.m. Pacific standard time;

added “(6) 10:11 a.m. Alaska standard time; and

added “(7) 9:11 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1089 Findings; Sense of Congress

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Vietnam Veterans Memorial continues to be a popular and important place of reflection and healing for a generation.
(2)
added The simple inscriptions of the names of the Nation’s dead bear mute testimony to the sacrifice of more than 58,000 Americans, serving as a deep source of comfort and pride for the families of those who were lost.
(3)
added 74 sailors were lost aboard the USS Frank E. Evans, which sank after colliding with the HMAS Melbourne on June 3, 1969, during a Southeast Asia Treaty Organization exercise just outside the designated combat zone.
(4)
added The Frank Evans had been providing support fire for combat operations in Vietnam before the exercise that resulted in the accident and was scheduled to return after the exercise.
(5)
added The families of the 74 men lost aboard the USS Frank E. Evans have been fighting for decades to have their loved ones added to the Memorial.
(6)
added Exceptions have been granted to inscribe the names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial for other servicemembers who were killed outside of the designated combat zone, including in 1983 when President Ronald Reagan ordered that 68 Marines who died on a flight outside the combat zone be added to the wall.
(7)
added Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, in a letter dated December 15, 2010, expressed support for the addition of the 74 names of the men lost aboard the USS Frank E. Evans to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
(8)
added The heroism and sacrifice should never go unrecognized because of an arbitrary line on a map.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should order that the names of the 74 military personnel lost aboard the USS Frank E. Evans on June 3, 1969, be added to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

Sec. 1090 Review of operation of certain ships during the Vietnam Era

added
(a)
added Review required— By not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review the logs of each ship under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy that is known to have operated in the waters near Vietnam during the Vietnam Era (as that term is defined in section 101(29) of title 38, United States Code) to determine—
(1)
added whether each such ship operated in the territorial waters of the Republic of Vietnam during the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975; and
(2)
added for each such ship that so operated—
(A)
added the date or dates when the ship so operated; and
(B)
added the distance from the shore of the location where the ship operated that was the closest proximity to shore.
(b)
added Provision of information to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs— Upon a determination that any such ship so operated, the Secretary of Defense shall provide such determination, together with the information described in subsection (a)(2) about the ship, to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(c)
added Public availability of information— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall make publicly available all unclassified information provided to the Secretary under subsection (b).

Sec. 1090A Sense of Congress recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Allied amphibious landing on D-Day, June 6, 1944, at Normandy, France

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added June 6, 2014, marks the 70th anniversary of the Allied assault at Normandy, France, by American, British, and Canadian troops, which was known as Operation Overlord.
(2)
added Before Operation Overlord, the German Army still occupied France and the Nazi government still had access to the raw materials and industrial capacity of Western Europe.
(3)
added The naval assault phase on Normandy was code-named “Neptune”, and the June 6th assault date is referred to as D-Day to denote the day on which the combat attack was initiated.
(4)
added The D-Day landing was the largest single amphibious assault in history, consisting of approximately 31,000 members of the United States Armed Forces, 153,000 members of the Allied Expeditionary Force, 5,000 naval vessels, and more than 11,000 sorties by Allied aircraft.
(5)
added Soldiers of 6 divisions (3 American, 2 British, and 1 Canadian) stormed ashore in 5 main landing areas on beaches in Normandy, which were code-named “Utah”, “Omaha”, “Gold”, “Juno”, and “Sword”.
(6)
added Of the approximately 10,000 Allied casualties incurred on the first day of the landing, more than 6,000 casualties were members of the United States Armed Forces.
(7)
added The age of the remaining World War II veterans and the gradual disappearance of any living memory of World War II and the Normandy landings make it necessary to increase activities intended to pass on the history of these events, particularly to younger generations.
(8)
added The young people of Normandy and the United States have displayed unprecedented commitment to and involvement in celebrating the veterans of the Normandy landings and the freedom that they brought with them in 1944.
(9)
added The significant material remains of the Normandy landing, such as shipwrecks and various items of military equipment found both on the Normandy beaches and at the bottom of the sea in French territorial waters, bear witness to the remarkable material resources used by the Allied Armed Forces to execute the Normandy landings.
(10)
added Five Normandy beaches and a number of sites on the Normandy coast, including Pointe du Hoc, were the scene of the Normandy landings, and constitute both now and for all time a unique piece of humanity's world heritage, and a symbol of peace and freedom, whose unspoilt nature, integrity, and authenticity must be protected at all costs.
(11)
added The world owes a debt of gratitude to the members of the “greatest generation” who assumed the task of freeing the world from Nazi and Fascist regimes and restoring liberty to Europe.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
added recognizes the 70th anniversary of the Allied amphibious landing on D-Day, June 6, 1944, at Normandy, France, during World War II;
(2)
added expresses gratitude and appreciation to the members of the United States Armed Forces who participated in the D-Day operations;
(3)
added thanks the young people of Normandy and the United States for their involvement in recognizing and celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Normandy landings with the aim of making future generations aware of the acts of heroism and sacrifice performed by the Allied forces;
(4)
added recognizes the efforts of the Government of France and the people of Normandy to preserve, for future generations, the unique world heritage represented by the Normandy beaches and the sunken material remains of the Normandy landing, by inscribing them on the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage List; and
(5)
added requests the President to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the anniversary with appropriate ceremonies and programs to honor the sacrifices of their fellow countrymen to liberate Europe.

Sec. 1090B Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from nonprofit organizations

added
(a)
added In general— Chapter 20 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 402 the following new section:

added “403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations

added “(a) Authorization of transportation—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may transport to any country, without charge, supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit organization and that are intended for distribution to members of the armed forces. Such supplies may be transported only on a space available basis.

added “(b) Limitations

added “(1) The Secretary may not transport supplies under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines that—

added “(A) the transportation of the supplies is consistent with the policies of the United States;

added “(B) the supplies are suitable for distribution to members of the armed forces and are in usable condition;

added “(C) there is a legitimate need for the supplies by the members of the armed forces for whom they are intended; and

added “(D) adequate arrangements have been made for the distribution and use of the supplies.

added “(2) Procedures—The Secretary shall establish procedures for making the determinations required under paragraph (1). Such procedures shall include inspection of supplies before acceptance for transport.

added “(3) Preparation—It shall be the responsibility of the nonprofit organization requesting the transport of supplies under this section to ensure that the supplies are suitable for transport.

added “(c) Distribution—Supplies transported under this section may be distributed by the United States Government or a nonprofit organization.

added “(d) Definition of nonprofit organization—In this section, the term “nonprofit organization” means an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code.”

(b)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402 the following new item:

Sec. 1090C Sense of Congress on Air Force Flight Training Aircraft

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The Air Force uses the T–1A aircraft to train Air Force pilots to operate tanker and transport aircraft.
(2)
added The Air Force is seeking a replacement aircraft for the T–1A which is experiencing obsolescence issues and high costs.
(3)
added An effective way to mitigate the T–1A’s cost, obsolescence, and complexity issues until a permanent replacement aircraft enters service, is to utilize contractor-owned, contractor-operated modern aircraft in the very light jet category.
(4)
added Conducting very light jet training via a contractor-owned, contractor-operated contract vehicle could provide increased flexibility and reduce unnecessary ownership costs.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force should formally assess the operational feasibility, costs, potential savings, and readiness implications of utilizing contractor-owned, contractor-operated, very light jet aircraft for interim flight instruction until a permanent replacement for the T–1A enters service.

Sec. 1090D Sense of Congress on establishment of an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health

added

added It is the sense of Congress that the President should establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled “Energy Employees Compensation: Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program’s Credibility”, numbered GAO–10–302, to—

(1)
added advise the President concerning the review and approval of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix;
(2)
added conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the weighing of a claimant’s medical evidence;
(3)
added obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements for part B claims related to lung disease regardless of approval;
(4)
added provide oversight over industrial hygienists, Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of Labor’s consulting physicians and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and
(5)
added coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to the extent necessary (under section 3624 the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384o).

Sec. 1090E NTIA retention of DNS responsibilities pending GAO report

added
(a)
added Retention of responsibilities— Until the Comptroller General of the United States submits the report required by subsection (b), the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information may not relinquish or agree to any proposal relating to the relinquishment of the responsibility of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (in this section referred to as the “NTIA”) over Internet domain name system functions, including responsibility with respect to the authoritative root zone file, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority functions, and related root zone management functions.
(b)
added Report— Not later than 1 year after the date on which the NTIA receives a proposal relating to the relinquishment of the responsibility of the NTIA over Internet domain name system functions that was developed in a process convened by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers at the request of the NTIA, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the role of the NTIA with respect to the Internet domain name system. Such report shall include—
(1)
added a discussion and analysis of—
(A)
added the advantages and disadvantages of relinquishment of the responsibility of the NTIA over Internet domain name system functions, including responsibility with respect to the authoritative root zone file, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority functions, and related root zone management functions;
(B)
added any principles or criteria that the NTIA sets for proposals for such relinquishment;
(C)
added each proposal received by the NTIA for such relinquishment;
(D)
added the processes used by the NTIA and any other Federal agencies for evaluating such proposals; and
(E)
added any national security concerns raised by such relinquishment; and
(2)
added a definition of the term “multistakeholder model”, as used by the NTIA with respect to Internet policymaking and governance, and definitions of any other terms necessary to understand the matters covered by the report.

Sec. 1091 Short title

added

added This subtitle may be cited as the “World War I Memorial Act of 2014”.

Sec. 1092 Designation of National World War I Museum and Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri

added
(a)
added Designation— The Liberty Memorial of Kansas City at America’s National World War I Museum in Kansas City, Missouri, is hereby designated as the “National World War I Museum and Memorial”.
(b)
added Ceremonies— The World War I Centennial Commission (in this subtitle referred to as the “Commission”) may plan, develop, and execute ceremonies to recognize the designation of the Liberty Memorial of Kansas City as the National World War I Museum and Memorial.

Sec. 1093 Redesignation of Pershing Park in the District of Columbia as the National World War I Memorial and enhancement of commemorative work

added
(a)
added Redesignation— Pershing Park in the District of Columbia is hereby redesignated as the “National World War I Memorial”.
(b)
added Ceremonies— The Commission may plan, develop, and execute ceremonies for the rededication of Pershing Park, as it approaches its 50th anniversary, as the National World War I Memorial and for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work as authorized by subsection (c).
(c)
added Authority To enhance commemorative work—
(1)
added In General— The Commission may enhance the General Pershing Commemorative Work by constructing on the land designated by subsection (a) as the National World War I Memorial appropriate sculptural and other commemorative elements, including landscaping, to further honor the service of members of the United States Armed Forces in World War I.
(2)
added General Pershing Commemorative Work defined— The term “General Pershing Commemorative Work” means the memorial to the late John J. Pershing, General of the Armies of the United States, who commanded the American Expeditionary Forces in World War I, and to the officers and men under his command, as authorized by Public Law 89–786 (80 Stat. 1377).
(d)
added Compliance with standards for commemorative works—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, applies to the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under subsection (c).
(2)
added Waiver of certain requirements—
(A)
added Site selection for memorial— Section 8905 of such title does not apply with respect to the selection of the site for the National World War I Memorial.
(B)
added Certain conditions— Section 8908(b) of such title does not apply to this subtitle.
(e)
added No infringement upon existing memorial— The National World War I Memorial may not interfere with or encroach on the District of Columbia War Memorial.
(f)
added Deposit of excess funds—
(1)
added Use for other World War I commemorative activities— If, upon payment of all expenses for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under subsection (c) (including the maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code), there remains a balance of funds received for such purpose, the Commission may use the amount of the balance for other commemorative activities authorized under the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2448).
(2)
added Use for other commemorative works— If the authority for enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work and the authority of the Commission to plan and conduct commemorative activities under the World War I Centennial Commission Act have expired and there remains a balance of funds received for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work, the Commission shall transmit the amount of the balance to a separate account with the National Park Foundation, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior following the process provided in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for accounts established under section 8906(b)(3) of such title, except that funds in such account may only be obligated subject to appropriation.
(g)
added Authorization To complete construction after termination of Commission— Section 8 of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272) is amended—
(1)
added in subsection (a), by striking “The Centennial Commission” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (c), the Centennial Commission”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(c) Exception for completion of National World War I Memorial—The Centennial Commission may perform such work as is necessary to complete the rededication of the National World War I Memorial and enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under section 1093 of the World War I Memorial Act of 2014, subject to section 8903 of title 40, United States Code.”

Sec. 1094 Additional amendments to World War I Centennial Commission Act

added
(a)
added Ex officio and other advisory members— Section 4 of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2449) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(e) Ex officio and other advisory members

added “(1) Powers—The individuals listed in paragraphs (2) and (3), or their designated representative, shall serve on the Centennial Commission solely to provide advice and information to the members of the Centennial Commission appointed pursuant to subsection (b)(1), and shall not be considered members for purposes of any other provision of this Act.

added “(2) Ex officio members—The following individuals shall serve as ex officio members:

added “(A) The Archivist of the United States.

added “(B) The Librarian of Congress.

added “(C) The Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution.

added “(D) The Secretary of Education.

added “(E) The Secretary of State.

added “(F) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

added “(G) The Administrator of General Services.

added “(3) Other advisory members—The following individuals shall serve as other advisory members:

added “(A) Four members appointed by the Secretary of Defense in the following manner: One from the Navy, one from the Marine Corps, one from the Army, and one from the Air Force.

added “(B) Two members appointed by the Secretary of Homeland Security in the following manner: One from the Coast Guard and one from the United States Secret Service.

added “(C) Two members appointed by the Secretary of the Interior, including one from the National Parks Service.

added “(4) Vacancies—A vacancy in a member position under paragraph (3) shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.”

(b)
added Payable rate of staff— Section 7(c)(2) of such Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2451) is amended—
(1)
added in subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end and inserting “, without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.”; and
(2)
added in subparagraph (B), by striking “level IV” and inserting “level II”.
(c)
added Limitation on obligation of Federal funds—
(1)
added Limitation— Section 9 of such Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2453) is amended to read as follows:

added “9. Limitation on obligation of Federal funds

added “No Federal funds may be obligated or expended for the designation, establishment, or enhancement of a memorial or commemorative work by the World War I Centennial Commission.”

(2)
added Conforming amendment— Section 7(f) of such Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2452) is repealed.
(3)
added Clerical amendment— The item relating to section 9 in the table of contents of such Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2448) is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 1095 National Commission on the Future of the Army

added
(a)
added Establishment— There is established the National Commission on the Future of the Army (in this subtitle referred to as the “Commission”).
(b)
added Membership—
(1)
added Composition— The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—
(A)
added four shall be appointed by the President;
(B)
added one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(C)
added one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(D)
added one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(E)
added one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added Appointment date— The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3)
added Effect of lack of appointment by appointment date— If one or more appointments under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not made. If an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make an appointment under such subparagraph shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number otherwise appointable under such subparagraph.
(4)
added Expertise— In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in reserve forces policy.
(c)
added Period of appointment; Vacancies— Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(d)
added Chair and vice chair— The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
(e)
added Initial meeting— Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed, the Commission shall hold its initial meeting.
(f)
added Meetings— The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair.
(g)
added Quorum— A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.
(h)
added Administrative and procedural authorities— The following provisions of law do not apply to the Commission:
(1)
added Section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(2)
added The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).

Sec. 1096 Duties of the Commission

added
(a)
added Study on structure of the Army—
(1)
added In general— The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of the structure of the Army, and policy assumptions related to the size and force mixture of the Army, to—
(A)
added determine the proper size and force mixture of the regular component of the Army and the reserve components of the Army; and
(B)
added make recommendations on how the structure should be modified to best fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources.
(2)
added Considerations— In undertaking the study required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give particular consideration to the following:
(A)
added An evaluation and identification of a structure for the Army that—
(i)
added has the depth and scalability to meet current and anticipated requirements of the combatant commands;
(ii)
added achieves a cost-efficiency balance between the regular and reserve components of the Army, taking advantage of the unique strengths and capabilities of each, with a particular focus on fully burdened and lifecycle cost of Army personnel;
(iii)
added ensures that the regular and reserve components of the Army have the capacity needed to support current and anticipated homeland defense and disaster assistance missions in the United States;
(iv)
added provides for sufficient numbers of regular members of the Army to provide a base of trained personnel from which the personnel of the reserve components of the Army could be recruited; and
(v)
added maximizes and appropriately balances affordability, efficiency, effectiveness, capability, and readiness.
(B)
added An evaluation and identification of force generation policies for the Army with respect to size and force mixture in order to best fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources, including policies in connection with—
(i)
added readiness;
(ii)
added training;
(iii)
added equipment;
(iv)
added personnel; and
(v)
added maintenance of the reserve components in an operational state in order to maintain the level of expertise and experience developed since September 11, 2001.
(b)
added Final report— Not later than February 1, 2016, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the study required by subsection (a), together with its recommendations for such legislation and administrative actions as the Commission considers appropriate in light of the results of the study.

Sec. 1097 Powers of the Commission

added
(a)
added Hearings— The Commission shall hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out its duties under this Act.
(b)
added Information from Federal agencies— The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties under this Act. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(c)
added Postal services— The Commission may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.
(d)
added Gifts— The Commission may accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services or property.

Sec. 1098 Commission personnel matters

added
(a)
added Compensation of members— Each member of the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(b)
added Travel expenses— The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(c)
added Staff—
(1)
added In general— The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission.
(2)
added Compensation— The Chair of the Commission may fix the compensation of the executive director and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the executive director and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
(c)
added Detail of government employees— Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege.
(d)
added Procurement of temporary and intermittent services— The Chair of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.

Sec. 1099 Termination of the Commission

added

added The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its final report under section 1096(b).

Sec. 1099A Funding

added

added Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 and available for operation and maintenance for the Army may be available for the activities of the Commission under this subtitle.

Sec. 1104 Permanent authority for experimental personnel program for scientific and technical personnel

(a)
changed In general— Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by striking subsections (e), (f) (f), and (g).
(b)
Conforming amendments— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in the section heading, by striking “Experimental” and inserting “Alternative”;
(2)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by striking “During the program period specified in subsection (e)(1), the” and inserting “The”; and
(B)
by striking “experimental”; and
(3)
in subsection (d)(1)—
(A)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “12-month period” and inserting “calendar year”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (A), striking “fiscal year” and inserting “calendar year”.

Sec. 1107 Pay parity for Department of Defense employees employed at joint bases

added
(a)
added Definitions— For purposes of this section—
(1)
added the term “joint military installation” means 2 or more military installations reorganized or otherwise associated and operated as a single military installation;
(2)
added the term “locality” or “pay locality” has the meaning given that term by section 5302(5) of title 5, United States Code; and
(3)
added the term “locality pay” refers to any amount payable under section 5304 or 5304a of title 5, United States Code.
(b)
added Pay parity at joint bases— Whenever 2 or more military installations are reorganized or otherwise associated as a single joint military installation, but the constituent installations are not all located within the same pay locality, all Department of Defense employees of the respective installations constituting the joint installation (who are otherwise entitled to locality pay) shall receive locality pay at a uniform percentage equal to the percentage which is payable with respect to the locality which includes the constituent installation then receiving the highest locality pay (expressed as a percentage).
(c)
added Regulations— The Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.
(d)
added Effective date; applicability—
(1)
added Effective date— This section shall be effective with respect to pay periods beginning on or after such date (not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section) as the Secretary of Defense shall determine in consultation with the Office of Personnel Management.
(2)
added Applicability— This section shall apply to any joint military installation created as a result of the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission in the 2005 base closure round.

Sec. 1108 Rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan

added

added Section 5542(a)(6)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “2014” and inserting “2015”.

Sec. 1109 Extension of part-time reemployment authority

added
(a)
added CSRS— Section 8344(l)(7) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by strike “5 years” and inserting “10 years”.
(b)
added FERS— Section 8468(i)(7) of such title is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting “10 years”.

Sec. 1212 Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations

(a)
Extension of authority— Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014 for overseas contingency operations” and inserting “by section 1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.
(b)
Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan— Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.
(c)
Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan— Subsection (d) of section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended—
(1)
changed in the subsection heading, by striking “in fiscal year 2013”; and2013”;
(2)
changed in paragraph (1), by striking “Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act,” and all that follows through “remain available for obligation” and inserting “No amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 or any prior fiscal year”.year”; and
(3)
added in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following:

added “(C) That Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority groups for their legitimate and nonviolent political and religious beliefs, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim.”

Sec. 1215 Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 150 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan

(a)
Requirement to withhold assistance to Afghanistan— An amount equivalent to 150 percent of the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance in violation of the status of forces agreement between the United States and Afghanistan (entered in force May 28, 2003) shall be withheld by the Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2015 to the extent that the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the appropriate congressional committees that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
(b)
Waiver authority— The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in Afghanistan.
(c)
Report— Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on any Department of Defense assistance.
(d)
added Process for reimbursement—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall request submission of claims for reimbursement, including full documentation, from each grantee, contractor, or subcontractor that paid to the Government of Afghanistan taxes assessed on Department of Defense assistance during fiscal year 2014 for an amount equal to the amount the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor paid to the Government of Afghanistan in such taxes.
(2)
added Plan for reimbursement— The Secretary of Defense shall seek to establish a plan in conjunction with the Government of Afghanistan to address claims for reimbursement described in paragraph (1) and to provide for reimbursement by the Government of Afghanistan of such claims. The Secretary shall submit any such plan established under this paragraph to the congressional defense committees in a timely manner.
(3)
added Reimbursement— If the Secretary of Defense does not submit the plan described in paragraph (2) to the congressional defense committees by not later than March 1, 2015, any funds withheld from the Government of Afghanistan pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used to reimburse each grantee, contractor, or subcontractor that submits a claim for reimbursement under paragraph (1) by the amount specified in such claim and verified by the Secretary.
(e)
renumbered was (5) Definitions— In this section:
(1)
renumbered was (5)(3) Appropriate congressional committees— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
renumbered was (5)(3)(3) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
renumbered was (5)(3)(4) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
renumbered was (5)(4) Department of Defense assistance— The term “Department of Defense assistance” means funds provided in a fiscal year to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors.
(f)
renumbered was (6) Termination— This section shall terminate at the close of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees a notification that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement and such agreement has entered into force.

Sec. 1216 United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces through the end of fiscal year 2018

(a)
Plan required— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end of fiscal year 2018, with the objective of ensuring that a strong and fully-capable ANSF will be able to independently and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and stability in Afghanistan.
(b)
Matters to be included— The plan contained in the report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following matters:
(1)
A comprehensive and effective strategy and budget, with defined objectives.
(2)
A description of the commitment for contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO nations, including the plan to achieve such commitments for the ANSF.
(3)
A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training, and services provided for the ANSF by the United States, countries participating in NATO, and other coalition forces that are not part of Operation Resolute Support.
(4)
Any actions to assist the Government of Afghanistan or on its behalf to achieve the following goals and the results of such actions:
(A)
Improve and sustain effective Afghan security institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff, including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting units.
(B)
Any additional train and equip efforts, including for the Afghan Air Force, as necessary, and Afghan Special Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of conducting operations independently and in sufficient numbers.
(C)
Establish strong ANSF-readiness assessment tools and metrics.
(D)
changed Improve and sustain strong, professional ANSF officers at the junior-, mid-, and senior-levelssenior-levels.
(E)
Further strong ANSF communication and control between central command and regions, provinces, and districts.
(F)
Develop and improve mechanisms for incorporating lessons learned and best practices into ANSF operations.
(G)
Improve ANSF oversight mechanisms, including a strong record-keeping system to track ANSF equipment and personnel.
(5)
added A description of efforts of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to engage United States manufacturers in procurement opportunities related to equipping the ANSF.
(c)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1218 Extension of Afghan special immigrant program

Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(E) Fiscal year 2015

changed “(i) In general—Except as provided in subparagraph (D), for fiscal year 2015, the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section may not exceed 1,080. 1,075. For purposes of status provided under this subparagraph—

“(I) the period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must terminate on or before December 31, 2015;

“(II) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than September 30, 2015; and

“(III) the authority to provide such status shall terminate on September 30, 2016.

“(ii) Construction—Clause (i) shall not be construed to affect numerical limitations, or the terms for provision of status, under subparagraph (D).”

Sec. 1219 Independent assessment of United States efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added al-Qaeda, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents continue to pose a significant threat to United States national security interests;
(2)
added al-Qaeda continues to evolve and reorganize to adapt to United States counterterrorism measures; and
(3)
added al-Qaeda has become more decentralized and less hierarchical over the past decade.
(b)
added Independent assessment—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the conduct of an independent assessment of the United States efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda, including its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents since May 2, 2011.
(2)
added Elements— The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added An assessment of al-Qaeda core’s relationship with any and all affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(B)
added An assessment of the aims, objectives, and capabilities of al-Qaeda core and any and all affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(C)
added An assessment of the Administration’s efforts to combat al-Qaeda core and any and all affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(D)
added An assessment of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40) and its relevance to the current structure and objectives of al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(E)
added A comprehensive order of battle for al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(3)
added Report—
(A)
added In general— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by paragraph (1) shall provide to the Secretary and the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing its findings as a result of the assessment.
(B)
added Form— The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
added Appropriate committees of Congress defined— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1)
added the congressional defense committees;
(2)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(3)
added the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1220 Sense of Congress

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The people of Afghanistan have taken the lead in providing for the security of their country and the successful elections are a positive step in the self-determination of the future of Afghanistan.
(2)
added However, no country can be successful in the long-term if a majority of its population is not included in the dialogue and decision-making of such country.
(3)
added The women of Afghanistan have made historic strides in the last several years and the elections prove that the women need and have a right to have a voice in the future of Afghanistan.
(4)
added To that end, the women of Afghanistan are vital to the development of Afghanistan and the national security of Afghanistan;
(5)
added Women are needed to serve Afghanistan in the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF), not just for the future standing of women in society, but for cultural reasons.
(6)
added Therefore, it is important that Afghanistan move forward in increasing the number of women in the ANSF with the current facilities and capacity to meet the requirements Afghanistan has proposed to achieve.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the allocation of $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 for the ANSF should be prioritized for the recruitment, retention, and training of women in the ANSF;
(2)
added current facilities to support women in the ANSF should be fully utilized before additional infrastructure is constructed;
(3)
added the Government of Afghanistan should ensure that the fund provided prioritize efforts to increase the number of women serving in the ANSF, as proposed in the Master Ministerial Development Plan for Afghan National Army (ANA) Gender Integration;
(4)
added as part of such plan, the conversion of the 13,000 women that were trained to support the elections is an important step in increasing the number of women in the ANSF;
(5)
added the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan’s report, “A Way to Go: An Update on Implementation of the Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women in Afghanistan”, should be integrated into efforts to enable women to serve in the ANSF; and
(6)
added the United States should continue to advocate for the rights and participation of women in Afghanistan in all levels of government and society.

Sec. 1220A Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or bases in Afghanistan

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended by the United States Government to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.

Sec. 1220B Review process for use of United States funds for construction projects in Afghanistan that cannot be physically accessed by United States Government civilian personnel

added
(a)
added Prohibition—
(1)
added In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for a construction project in Afghanistan in excess of $500,000 that cannot be audited and physically inspected by authorized United States Government civilian personnel or their designated representatives, in accordance generally-accepted auditing guidelines.
(2)
added Applicability— Paragraph (1) shall apply only with respect to a project that is initiated on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
added Waiver— The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived with respect to a project if not less than 15 days prior to the obligation of funds for the project, the agency responsible for such funds submits to the relevant authorizing committees a plan outlining how the agency will monitor the use of the funds—
(1)
added to ensure the funds are used for the specific purposes for which the funds are intended; and
(2)
added to mitigate waste, fraud, and abuse.

Sec. 1220C Actions to support human rights, participation, prevention of violence, existing frameworks, and security and mobility with respect to women and girls in Afghanistan

added
(a)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that promoting women’s meaningful inclusion and participation in conflict prevention, management, and resolution, as well as in post-conflict relief and recovery, advances core United States national interests of peace, national security, economic and social development, and international cooperation.
(b)
added Statement of policy— It is the policy of the United States—
(1)
added to promote and support the security of women and girls in conflict-affected and post-conflict regions and ensure their protection from sexual and gender-based violence;
(2)
added to promote and support the security of women and girls in Afghanistan during the security transition process and recognize that promoting security for Afghan women and girls must remain a priority of United States foreign policy; and
(3)
added to maintain and improve the gains of women and girls in Afghanistan made since 2002, including in terms of their political participation and integration in security forces.
(c)
added Actions required—
(1)
added In general— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall take such actions as may be necessary to ensure the indicators of success of the security transition process and establishment of an independent Afghanistan as described in paragraph (2) are achieved.
(2)
added Indicators of success— The indicators of success referred to in paragraph (1) are the following:
(A)
added Support for human rights of women and girls in Afghanistan.
(B)
added Participation of women in Afghanistan at all levels of decision-making and governance in Afghanistan.
(C)
added Strategic integration of women in the Afghan National Security Forces.
(D)
added Support for initiatives to prevent sexual and gender-based violence, including implementation of Afghanistan’s Elimination of Violence Against Women law and support for the Ministry of Interior’s Family Response Units in the Afghan National Police.
(E)
added Support for existing frameworks, including the National Action Plan for the Women of Afghanistan, the Afghanistan National Development Strategy, and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework.
(F)
added Recognition of the ability of women in Afghanistan to move freely and securely throughout Afghanistan.
(d)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on efforts by the United States Government to support the human rights, participation, prevention of violence, existing frameworks, and security and mobility with respect to women and girls in Afghanistan.
(2)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
added the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1220D Sense of Congress relating to Dr. Shakil Afridi

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The attacks of September 11, 2001, killed approximately 3,000 people, most of whom were Americans, but also included hundreds of individuals with foreign citizenships, nearly 350 New York Fire Department personnel, and about 50 law enforcement officers.
(2)
added Downed United Airlines flight 93 was reportedly intended, under the control of the al-Qaeda high-jackers, to crash into the White House or the Capitol in an attempt to kill the President of the United States or Members of the United States Congress.
(3)
added The September 11, 2001, attacks were largely planned and carried out by the al-Qaeda terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri, after which Osama bin Laden enjoyed safe haven in Pakistan from where he continued to plot deadly attacks against the United States and the world.
(4)
added The United States has obligated nearly $30 billion between 2002 and 2014 in United States taxpayer money for security and economic aid to Pakistan.
(5)
added The United States very generously and swiftly responded to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake in Pakistan with more than $200 million in emergency aid and the support of several United States military aircraft, approximately 1,000 United States military personnel, including medical specialists, thousands of tents, blankets, water containers and a variety of other emergency equipment.
(6)
added The United States again generously and swiftly contributed approximately $150 million in emergency aid to Pakistan following the 2010 Pakistan flood, in addition to the service of nearly twenty United States military helicopters, their flight crews, and other resources to assist the Pakistan Army’s relief efforts.
(7)
added The United States continues to work tirelessly to support Pakistan’s economic development, including millions of dollars allocated towards the development of Pakistan’s energy infrastructure, health services and education system.
(8)
added The United States and Pakistan continue to have many critical shared interests, both economic and security related, which could be the foundation for a positive and mutually beneficial partnership.
(9)
added Dr. Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani physician, is a hero to whom the people of the United States, Pakistan and the world owe a debt of gratitude for his help in finally locating Osama bin Laden before more innocent American, Pakistani and other lives were lost to this terrorist leader.
(10)
added Pakistan, the United States and the international community had failed for nearly 10 years following attacks of September 11, 2001, to locate and bring Osama bin Laden, who continued to kill innocent civilians in the Middle East, Asia, Europe, Africa and the United States, to justice without the help of Dr. Afridi.
(11)
added The Government of Pakistan’s imprisonment of Dr. Afridi presents a serious and growing impediment to the United States’ bilateral relations with Pakistan.
(12)
added The Government of Pakistan has leveled and allowed baseless charges against Dr. Afridi in a politically motivated, spurious legal process.
(13)
added Dr. Afridi is currently imprisoned by the Government of Pakistan, a deplorable and unconscionable situation which calls into question Pakistan’s actual commitment to countering terrorism and undermines the notion that Pakistan is a true ally in the struggle against terrorism.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that Dr. Shakil Afridi is an international hero and that the Government of Pakistan should release him immediately from prison.

Sec. 1228 Plan to reduce Russian Federation nuclear force dependencies on Ukraine

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The Russian Federation relies on the Ukrainian defense industry for certain elements of its land-based nuclear ballistic missile force, the Russian Strategic Rocket Force.
(2)
added Press reports indicate that Ukraine’s Yuzhnoye Design Bureau played a prominent role during the Soviet era in producing heavy silo-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles.
(3)
added These land-based missiles include the RS–20 ICBM, known by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Designator, SATAN.
(4)
added This missile has been reported to be deployed with as many as 10 independently targetable nuclear reentry vehicles.
(5)
added In a press conference on May 13, 2014, Russian Federation Deputy Prime Minster Dmitry Rogozin stated that his country would discontinue the sale of Russia-made rocket engines to the United States if they will be used for military purposes.
(b)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should promptly enter into discussions with the Government of Ukraine to ensure a halt to the activities of the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and any other Ukrainian industry that supports the military or military industrial base of the Russian Federation while Russia is violating its commitments under the Budapest Memorandum, illegally occupying Ukrainian territory and supporting groups that are inciting violence and fomenting secessionist movements in Ukraine.
(c)
added Plan— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan on how the United States Government intends to work with the Government of Ukraine to accomplish the goals expressed in subsection (b) and any recommendations it has for how the United States and its allies could benefit from the capability of the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau.

Sec. 1229 Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with Rosoboronexport

added
(a)
added Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 may be used to enter into a contract (or subcontract at any tier under such a contract), memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant to, or to provide a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport.
(b)
added National security waiver authority— The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees, to the best of the Secretary’s knowledge, the following:
(1)
added Rosoboronexport has ceased the transfer of lethal military equipment to, and the maintenance of existing lethal military equipment for, the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic.
(2)
added The armed forces of the Russian Federation have withdrawn from Crimea, other than armed forces present on military bases subject to agreements in force between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Ukraine.
(3)
added The Government of the Russian Federation has withdrawn substantially all of the armed forces of the Russian Federation from the immediate vicinity of the eastern border of Ukraine.
(4)
added Agents of the Russian Federation have ceased taking active measures to destabilize the control of the Government of Ukraine over eastern Ukraine.
(c)
added Department of Defense Inspector General review—
(1)
added In general— The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct a review of any action involving Rosoboronexport with respect to which a waiver is issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (b).
(2)
added Elements— A review conducted under paragraph (1) shall assess the accuracy of the factual and legal conclusions made by the Secretary of Defense in the waiver covered by the review, including—
(A)
added whether there is any viable alternative to Rosoboronexport for carrying out the functions for which funds will be obligated;
(B)
added whether the Secretary has previously used an alternative vendor for carrying out the same functions regarding the military equipment in question, and what vendor was previously used;
(C)
added whether other explanations for the issuance of the waiver are supportable; and
(D)
added any other matter with respect to the waiver the Inspector General considers appropriate.
(3)
added Report— Not later than 90 days after the date on which a waiver is issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (b), the Inspector General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the review conducted under paragraph (1) with respect to such waiver.

Sec. 1230 Requirements relating to certain defense transfers to the Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Statement of policy— It is the policy of the United States to oppose the transfer of defense articles or defense services (as defined in the Arms Export Control Act) from any country that is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to, or on behalf of, the Russian Federation, during any period in which the Russian Federation forcibly occupies the territory of Ukraine or of a NATO member country.
(b)
added NATO policy— The President shall use the voice and vote of the United States in NATO to seek the adoption of a policy by NATO that is consistent with the policy of the United States specified in subsection (a).
(c)
added Identification of certain defense transfers—
(1)
added In general— The President shall direct the appropriate departments and agencies of the United States to monitor all transfers of defense articles or defense services from NATO member countries to the Russian Federation and identify those transfers that are contrary to the policy of the United States specified in subsection (a).
(2)
added Report—
(A)
added In general— The President shall submit a written report to the chairmen and ranking members of the appropriate committees of Congress within 5 days of the receipt of information indicating that a transfer described in paragraph (1) has occurred.
(B)
added Form— The report required under subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified form.
(C)
added Appropriate committees of Congress defined— In this paragraph, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(i)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(ii)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(d)
added Licensing policy for certain defense transfers—
(1)
added In general— If a NATO member country transfers, or allows a transfer by a person subject to its national jurisdiction of, a defense article or defense service on or after the date of the enactment of this Act that is contrary to the policy of the United States specified in subsection (a) and is identified pursuant to subsection (c), an application for a license or other authorization required under the Arms Export Control Act for the transfer of any defense article or service to, or on behalf of, that NATO member country shall be subject to a presumption of denial.
(2)
added Effective period— A presumption of denial shall apply to an application for a license or other authorization under paragraph (1) only during a period in which the Russian Federation forcibly occupies the territory of Ukraine or of a NATO member country.
(3)
added Amendment to ITAR— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall amend the International Trafficking in Arms Regulations for purposes of implementing this subsection.

Sec. 1230A Limitation on funds for implementation of the New START Treaty

added
(a)
added Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used for implementation of the New START Treaty until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(1)
added the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2)
added the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of all Ukrainian territory;
(3)
added the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that are inconsistent with the INF Treaty;
(4)
added the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations; and
(5)
added there have been no inconsistencies by the Russian Federation with New START Treaty requirements.
(b)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added Appropriate congressional committees— The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
added CFE Treaty— The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(3)
added INF Treaty— The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(4)
added New START Treatu— The term “New START Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.
(c)
added Effective date— This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of such date of enactment.

Sec. 1240 Sense of Congress on future of NATO and enlargement initiatives

added
(a)
added Statement of policy— Congress declares that—
(1)
added the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been the cornerstone of transatlantic security cooperation and an enduring instrument for promoting stability in Europe and around the world for over 65 years;
(2)
added the incorporation of the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Albania, and Croatia has been essential to the success of NATO in this modern era;
(3)
added these countries have over time added to and strengthened the list of key European allies of the United States;
(4)
added since joining NATO, these member states have remained committed to the collective defense of the Alliance and have demonstrated their will and ability to contribute to transatlantic solidarity and assume increasingly more responsibility for international peace and security;
(5)
added since joining the alliance, these NATO members states have contributed to numerous NATO-led peace, security, and stability operations, including participation in the International Security Assistance Force’s (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan;
(6)
added these NATO member states have become reliable partners and supporters of aspiring members and the United States recognizes their continued efforts to aid in further enlargement initiatives; and
(7)
added the commitment by these NATO member states to Alliance principles and active participation in Alliance initiatives shows the success of NATO’s Open-Door Policy.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added at the September 2014 NATO Summit in Wales and beyond, the United States should—
(A)
added continue to work with aspirant countries to prepare such countries for entry into NATO;
(B)
added seek NATO membership for Montenegro;
(C)
added continue supporting a Membership Action Plan (MAP) for Georgia;
(D)
added encourage the leaders of Macedonia and Greece to find a mutually agreeable solution to the name dispute between the two countries;
(E)
added seek a Dayton II agreement to resolve the constitutional issues of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
(F)
added work with the Republic of Kosovo to prepare the country for entrance into the Partnership for Peace (PfP) program;
(G)
added take a leading role in working with NATO member states to identify, through consensus, the current and future security threats facing the Alliance; and
(H)
added take a leading role to work with NATO allies to ensure the alliance maintains the required capabilities, including the gains in interoperability from combat in Afghanistan, necessary to meet the security threats to the Alliance.
(2)
added NATO member states should review defense spending to ensure sufficient funding is obligated to meet NATO responsibilities; and
(3)
added the United States should remain committed to maintaining a military presence in Europe as a means of promoting allied interoperability and providing visible assurance to NATO allies in the region.

Sec. 1240A Sale of F–16 aircraft to Taiwan

added

added The President shall carry out the sale of no fewer than 66 F–16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan.

Sec. 1247 Requirement of Department of Defense to continue implementation of United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and participation in Interagency Working Group

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the most dangerous places to be a woman are some of the most unstable and violent regions in the world and gender-based violence will impact one in three women worldwide and this in turn has a direct impact on United States national security, the stability of nations, the rule of law, democracy, and peace-building processes;
(2)
combating violence against women and girls through the implementation and integration of gender-based violence prevention and response mechanisms throughout United States overseas operations is a critical step toward promoting regional and global stability and achieving sustainable peace and security;
(3)
under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055, One Hundred Twelfth Congress), the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development were directed in the matter relating to section 7061 to submit to Congress a multi-year strategy to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls in countries where it is common through achievable and sustainable goals, benchmarks for measuring progress, and expected results, including through regular engagement with men and boys as community leaders and advocates in ending such violence;
(4)
changed Executive Order No. 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally (in this section referred to as the “Strategy”), the first such strategy submitted pursuant to the matter relating to section 7061 under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012;
(5)
changed Executive Order No. 13623 required the Department of Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-chaired by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development to implement the Strategy; and
(6)
since the authority for the Strategy was established initially in the matter relating to section 7061 under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012, it is important for Congress to maintain its appropriate oversight over the implementation of the Strategy.
(b)
Briefings required—
(1)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on efforts of the Department of Defense relating to participation in the Interagency Working Group to implement the Strategy.
(2)
Matters to be included— As part of the briefings, the Secretary shall describe specifically efforts of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group to implement international violence against women and girls prevention and response strategies, funding allocations, programming, and associated outcomes.
(3)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(c)
Requirement to continue implementation of strategy and participation in interagency working group— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense—
(1)
during the current period of the Strategy, continues to implement the Strategy as appropriate by reason of the role of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group; and
(2)
continues to participate in interagency collaborative efforts to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls.

Sec. 1250 Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense systems

(a)
added People’s Republic of China— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense or for United States contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United States.
(b)
added Russian Federation—
(1)
added Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that missile defense systems of the Russian Federation should not be integrated into the missile defense systems of the United States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization if such integration undermines the security of the United States or NATO.
(2)
added Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense or for United States contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the Russian Federation into missile defense systems of the United States if such integration undermines the security of the United States or NATO.
(3)
added Waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph (2) if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the Russian Federation—
(A)
added has withdrawn military forces and assets from Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula, other than at those operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine; and
(B)
added has ceased aggressive actions, particularly along Ukraine’s eastern border, that have led to a destabilization of the Ukrainian government and the safety of its residents.

removed None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense or for United States contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United States.

Sec. 1251 Report, determination, and strategy regarding the terrorists responsible for the attack against United States personnel in Benghazi, Libya, and other regional threats

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added On September 11, 2012, United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya were attacked by an organized group of armed terrorists, killing United States Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods.
(2)
added On September 14, 2012, President Obama stated that: “We will bring to justice those who took them from us * * * making it clear that justice will come to those who harm Americans.”.
(3)
added On May 1, 2014, White House spokesman Jay Carney stated that: “I can assure you that the President’s direction is that those who killed four Americans will be pursued by the United States until they are brought to justice. And if anyone doubts that, they should ask * * * friends and family members of Osama bin Laden.”.
(4)
added In testimony before Congress in October 2013, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, asserted that the President lacks the authority to use military force to find and kill the Benghazi attackers.
(5)
added Since the Benghazi attacks, the President has not requested authority from Congress to use military force against the Benghazi attackers.
(6)
added No terrorist responsible for the Benghazi attacks has been brought to justice.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
added the persons and organizations who carried out the attacks on United States personnel in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 and 12, 2012, pose a continuing threat to the national security of the United States;
(2)
added the failure to hold any individual responsible for these terrorist attacks is a travesty of justice, and undermines the national security of the United States; and
(3)
added the uncertainty surrounding the authority of the President to use force against the terrorists responsible for the attack against United States personnel in Benghazi, Libya, undermines the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States.
(c)
added Report and determination—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress—
(A)
added a report that contains—
(i)
added the identity and location of those persons and organizations that planned, authorized, or committed the attacks against the United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya that occurred on September 11 and 12, 2012; and
(ii)
added a detailed and specific description of all actions that have been taken to kill or capture any of the persons described in clause (i); and
(B)
added a determination regarding whether the President currently possesses the authority to use the Armed Forces of the United States against all persons and organizations described in subparagraph (A)(i).
(2)
added Form— The report and determination described in this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form to the maximum extent possible, and may contain a classified annex.
(d)
added Strategy to combat regional terrorist threats—
(1)
added Timing and content— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to counter the growing threat posed by radical Islamist terrorist groups in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel, which shall include, among other things—
(A)
added a strategy to bring to justice those persons who planned, authorized, or committed the terrorist attacks against the United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya that occurred on September 11 and 12, 2012;
(B)
added a description of the radical Islamist terrorist groups active in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel, including an assessment of their origins, strategic aims, tactical methods, funding sources, leadership, and relationships with other terrorist groups or state actors;
(C)
added a description of the key military, diplomatic, intelligence, and public diplomacy resources available to address these growing regional terrorist threats; and
(D)
added a strategy to maximize the coordination between, and the effectiveness of, United States military, diplomatic, intelligence, and public diplomacy resources to counter these growing regional terrorist threats.
(2)
added Form— The strategy described in this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form to the maximum extent possible, and may contain a classified annex.
(3)
added Definition of appropriate congressional committees— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
added the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1252 War Powers of Congress

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added In 1793, George Washington said, “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”.
(2)
added In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1798, James Madison wrote: “The constitution supposes, what the History of all Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to the Legislature.”.
(3)
added In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution which states in section 2: “The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”.
(4)
added With respect to United States military intervention in Syria, President Obama said, “But having made my decision as Commander-in-Chief based on what I am convinced is our national security interests, I’m also mindful that I’m the President of the world’s oldest constitutional democracy. I’ve long believed that our power is rooted not just in our military might, but in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. And that’s why I've made a second decision: I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people’s representatives in Congress.”.
(b)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any use of military force.

Sec. 1253 Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty

added
(a)
added In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has received the advice and consent of the Senate and has been the subject of implementing legislation, as required, by the Congress.
(b)
added Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to United States standards.

Sec. 1254 Rule of construction

added

added Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Syria or Iran.

Sec. 1255 Combating crime through intelligence capabilities

added

added The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets, personnel, and resources to the Joint Interagency Task Force South, in coordination with SOUTHCOM, to combat the following by supplying sufficient intelligence capabilities:

(1)
added Transnational criminal organizations.
(2)
added Drug trafficking.
(3)
added Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency.
(4)
added Narco-terrorism.
(5)
added Human trafficking.
(6)
added The Iranian presence in the Western Hemisphere.

Sec. 1256 Statement of policy

added

added It shall be the policy of the United States to undertake a whole-of-government approach to bolster regional cooperation with countries throughout the Western Hemisphere, with the exception of Cuba, to counter narcotics trafficking and illicit activities in the Western Hemisphere.

Sec. 1257 Declaration of policy regarding Israel’s lawful exercise of self-defense

added

added Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to fully support Israel’s lawful exercise of self-defense, including actions to halt regional aggression.

Sec. 1258 Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to self-defense

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel to self-defense.
(2)
added The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) expressed the sense of Congress that the Government of the United States should transfer to the Government of Israel defense articles and defense services such as air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.
(3)
added The inherent right of Israel to self-defense necessarily includes the possession and maintenance by Israel of an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests.
(b)
added Policy of the united states— It is the policy of the United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests.
(c)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that air refueling tankers and advanced bunker-buster munitions should immediately be transferred to Israel to ensure our democratic ally has an independent capability to remove any existential threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program and defend its vital national interests.
(d)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter for a period not to exceed four years, the President shall submit to the House and Senate Armed Services committees, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the House and Senate Appropriations committees a report that—
(1)
added identifies all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-buster munitions, and other capabilities and platforms that would contribute significantly to the maintenance by Israel of a robust independent capability to remove existential security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests;
(2)
added assesses the availability for sale or transfer of items necessary to acquire the capabilities and platforms described in paragraph (1) as well as the legal authorities available for making such transfers; and
(3)
added describes the steps the President is taking to immediately transfer the items described in paragraph (1) pursuant to the policy described in subsection (b).

Sec. 1262 Report on contractors with the Department of Defense that have conducted significant transactions with Iranian persons or the Government of Iran

(a)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a period not to exceed 3 years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following:
(1)
A list of each contractor with the Department of Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person (other than an Iranian person listed under paragraph (2)) or the Government of Iran.
(2)
changed A list of each contractor with the Department of Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person whose property has been blocked pursuant to Executive Order No. 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079) or Executive Order No. 13382 (70 Fed. Reg. 38567) during the 5-year period preceding the date of the submission of the report.
(3)
The value of each significant transaction described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1266 Report on Accountability for Crimes Against Humanity in Nigeria

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— Congress—
(1)
added strongly condemns the ongoing violence and the systematic gross human rights violations against the people of Nigeria carried out by the jihadist organization Boko Haram;
(2)
added expresses its support for the people of Nigeria who wish to live in a peaceful, economically prosperous, and democratic Nigeria; and
(3)
added calls on the President to support Nigerian and International Community efforts to ensure accountability for crimes against humanity committed by Boko Haram against the people of Nigeria, particularly young girls kidnapped from educational institutions by Boko Haram.
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on crimes against humanity committed by Boko Haram in Nigeria.
(2)
added Elements— The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A)
added A description of initiatives undertaken by the Department of Defense to assist the Government of Nigeria to develop its own capacity to deploy specialized police and army units rapidly to bring Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau to justice and to prevent and combat sectarian violence in cities and areas in Nigeria where there has been a history of sectarian violence.
(B)
added A description of violations of internationally recognized human rights and crimes against humanity perpetrated by Boko Haram in Nigeria, including a description of the conventional and unconventional weapons used for such crimes and, where possible, the origins of the weapons.
(C)
added A description of efforts by the Department of Defense to ensure accountability for violations of internationally recognized human rights and crimes against humanity perpetrated against the people of Nigeria by Boko Haram and al-Qaeda affiliates and other jihadists in Nigeria, including—
(i)
added a description of initiatives that the United States has undertaken to train Nigerian investigators on how to document, investigate, and develop findings of crimes against humanity; and
(ii)
added an assessment of the impact of those initiatives.

Sec. 1267 Sense of Congress regarding the naval capabilities of the Russian Federation

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added Mistral class amphibious assault warships, each of which has the capacity to carry 16 helicopters, up to 700 soldiers, four landing craft, 60 armored vehicles, and 13 tanks, would significantly increase the naval capabilities of the Russian navy;
(2)
added Mistral class warships would allow the Russian navy to expand its naval presence in the region, thereby augmenting its capabilities against Ukraine, Georgia, and Baltic member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;
(3)
added France should not proceed with its sale of two Mistral class warships to the Russian Federation; and
(4)
added the President, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense should use diplomatic means to urge their counterparts in the Government of France not to proceed with its sale of two Mistral class warships to the Russian Federation.

Sec. 1268 Report on collective and national security implications of central Asian and South Caucasus energy development

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Assured access to stable energy supplies is an enduring concern of both the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
(2)
added Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new NATO Strategic Concept declares that “[s]ome NATO countries will become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for their energy needs”.
(3)
added The report required by section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) reaffirmed the Strategic Concept’s assessment of growing energy dependence of some members of the NATO alliance and also noted there is value in the assured access, protection, and delivery of energy.
(4)
added Development of energy resources and transit routes in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea can diversify sources of supply for members of the NATO alliance, particularly those in Eastern Europe.
(b)
added Report—
(1)
added Report— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on the implications of new energy resource development and distribution networks, both planned and under construction, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea for energy security strategies of the United States and NATO.
(2)
added Elements— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
added An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution network.
(B)
added An assessment of the potential of energy resources of the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea to mitigate such dependence on a single supplier or distribution network.
(C)
added Recommendations, if any, for ways in which the United States can help support increased energy security for NATO members.
(3)
added Submission of classified information— The report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(c)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
added the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1269 Findings and sense of Congress

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added Protecting cultural property abroad is a vital part of United States cultural diplomacy, showing the respect of the United States for other cultures and the common heritage of humanity.
(2)
added Cultural property abroad has been lost, damaged, or destroyed due to political instability, armed conflict, natural disasters, and other threats.
(3)
added In Egypt, political instability has led to the ransacking of its museums, resulting in the destruction of countless ancient artifacts that will forever leave gaps in humanity’s knowledge of the ancient Egyptian civilization.
(4)
added In Syria, the ongoing civil war has resulted in the shelling of medieval cities, damage to World Heritage Sites, and the looting of museums and archaeological sites. Archaeological and historic sites and artifacts in Syria date back more than six millennia, and include some of the earliest examples of writing.
(5)
added In Mali, the Al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group Ansar Dine destroyed tombs and shrines in the ancient city of Timbuktu, once a major center for Islamic learning and scholarship in the 15th and 16th centuries, and threatened collections of ancient manuscripts.
(6)
added In Afghanistan, the Taliban decreed that the Bamiyan Buddhas, ancient statues carved into a cliff side in central Afghanistan, were to be destroyed. In 2001 the Taliban carried out their threat and destroyed the statues, leading to worldwide condemnation.
(7)
added In Iraq, after the fall of Saddam Hussein, thieves looted the Iraq Museum in Bagdad, resulting in the loss of approximately 15,000 items. These included ancient amulets, sculptures, ivories, and cylinder seals. Many of these items remain unrecovered.
(8)
added The destruction of these and other cultural properties represents an irreparable loss to humanity’s common cultural heritage, and therefore to all Americans.
(9)
added The Armed Forces have played important roles in preserving and protecting cultural property. On June 23, 1943, President Franklin D. Roosevelt established the American Commission for the Protection and Salvage of Artistic and Historic Monuments in War Areas to provide expert advice to the military on the protection of cultural property. The Commission formed Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives (MFAA) teams which became part of the Civil Affairs Division of Military Government Section of the Allied armies. The individuals serving in the MFAA were known as the “Monuments Men” and have been credited with securing, cataloguing, and returning hundreds of thousands works of art stolen by the Nazis during World War II.
(10)
added The United States Committee of the Blue Shield was founded in 2006 to support the implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, and to coordinate with the Armed Forces, other branches of the United States Government, and other cultural heritage nongovernmental organizations in preserving cultural property abroad threatened by political instability, armed conflict, or natural or other disasters.
(b)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
added the Armed Forces play an important role in preserving and protecting cultural property in countries at risk of destruction due to political instability, armed conflict, or natural or other disasters; and
(2)
added the United States must protect cultural property abroad pursuant to its obligations under the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and customary international law in all conflicts to which the United States is a party.
(c)
added Report on activities of the Department of Defense in regards to protecting cultural property abroad— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on efforts of the Department of Defense to protect cultural property abroad, including activities undertaken pursuant to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, other cultural protection statutes, and international agreements, including—
(1)
added directives, policies, and regulations the Department has instituted to protect cultural property abroad at risk of destruction due to political instability, armed conflict, or natural or other disasters;
(2)
added actions the Armed Forces have taken to protect cultural property abroad, including efforts made to avoid damage, to the extent possible, to cultural property through construction activities, training to ensure deploying military personnel are able to identify, avoid, and protect cultural property abroad, and other efforts made to inform military personnel about the protection of cultural property as part of the law of war; and
(3)
added the status and number of specialist personnel in the Armed Forces assigned to secure respect for cultural property abroad and to cooperate with civilian authorities responsible for safeguarding cultural property abroad, as required by existing treaty obligations under Article 7 of the 1954 Hague Convention.

Sec. 1270 Sense of Congress on Nigeria and Boko Haram

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added In recent years, Boko Haram has furthered violence and instability in Nigeria and bordering countries.
(2)
added The terrorist group known as “Boko Haram,” which translates to “Western education is forbidden,” perpetrates violent attacks in Nigeria and has grown in strength and sophistication since its founding in 2002.
(3)
added Boko Haram kidnapped over 200 female students on April 14, 2014, killed over 50 male students on February 25, 2014, and continues to violently attack innocent civilians throughout Nigeria.
(4)
added Boko Haram has previously attacked Western interests, bombing the United Nations building in Abuja on August 26, 2011, and was affiliated with taking Western hostages in Bauchi on February 16, 2013, and later killing seven hostages.
(5)
added As stated by United States Ambassador to Nigeria Terrence P. McCulley in 2012, the threat of Boko Haram is growing: “We“ve seen an increase in sophistication, we”ve seen increased lethality. We saw at least a part of the group has decided it’s in their interest to attack the international community.”.
(6)
added In June 2012, the Department of State added three leaders of Boko Haram, Abubakar Shekau, Abubakar Adam Kambar, and Khalid al-Barnawi, to the Specially Designated Global Terrorist list.
(7)
added In November 2013, the Department of State designated Boko Haram and its splinter group, Ansaru, as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
(8)
added Boko Haram shares the ideological designs of al Qaeda, and has made public pledges of support to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and al-Shabaab.
(9)
added Boko Haram poses a broader threat to interests in Nigeria, the Sahel, Europe, and the United States.
(b)
added Sense of congress— In light of the findings specified in subsection (a), it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1)
added take appropriate action with allies and partners of the United States to fight Boko Haram’s violence and ideology;
(2)
added partner with Nigeria’s regional neighbors to counter Boko Haram’s cross-border activity and respond to emerging threats; and
(3)
added develop a long-term, interagency strategy to combat Boko Haram and Ansaru, reassess United States assistance to Nigeria, and brief Congress on this strategy.

Sec. 1271 Recognition of victims of Soviet Communist and Nazi regimes

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
added On August 13, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill issued a joint declaration “of certain common principles in the national policies of their respective countries on which they based their hopes for a better future for the world” and “the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live and self government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them” and that the people of countries may live in freedom.
(2)
added The United States Government has actively advocated for and continues to support the principles of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations General Assembly resolution 260 (III) of December 9, 1948.
(3)
added Captive Nations Week, signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1959, raised public awareness of the oppression of nations under the control of Communist and other nondemocratic governments.
(4)
added The European Parliament resolution on European conscience and totalitarianism of April 2, 2009, and the “Black Ribbon Day” resolution adopted by the Parliament of Canada on November 30, 2009, establish a day of remembrance for victims of Communist and Nazi regimes to remember and commemorate their victims.
(5)
added On the 70th anniversary of the formal adoption by the Nazi leadership of the “Final Solution of the Jewish Problem”, members of the European Parliament and the national parliaments of the European Union rejected attempts to obfuscate the Holocaust by persons who sought to diminish the uniqueness of the Holocaust by deeming the Holocaust to be equal, similar, or equivalent to Communism.
(6)
added Extreme forms of totalitarian rule have led to premeditated and vast crimes committed against millions of human beings and their basic and inalienable rights on a scale unseen before in history.
(7)
added The Nazi regime committed mass genocide during the Holocaust, killing millions of Jews, political opponents, and minority populations.
(8)
added August 23 would be an appropriate date to designate as “Black Ribbon Day” to remember and never forget the terror millions of citizens in Central and Eastern Europe experienced for more than 40 years by ruthless military, economic, and political repression of the people through arbitrary executions, mass arrests, deportations, the suppression of free speech, confiscation of private property, and the destruction of cultural and moral identity and civil society, all of which deprived the vast majority of the peoples of Central and Eastern Europe of their basic human rights and dignity, separating them from the democratic world by means of the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall.
(9)
added The memories of Europe's tragic past cannot be forgotten in order to honor the victims, condemn the perpetrators, and lay the foundation for reconciliation based on truth and remembrance.
(b)
added Recognition— Congress supports the designation of “Black Ribbon Day” to recognize the victims of Soviet Communist and Nazi regimes.

Sec. 1272 Report relating to rescue efforts in Nigerian kidnapping

added

added Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall transmit to Congress a report on the findings of United States military personnel assisting in the search and rescue efforts of the more than 200 girls and young women who were abducted from the Government Secondary School in Chibok, Nigeria by Boko Haram. Such report shall include—

(1)
added the location, health, and safety of the abducted girls, to the extent such information is ascertainable;
(2)
added recommendations on what the Nigerian government can do to protect the girls and similarly situated girls moving forward;
(3)
added an assessment of the threat of Boko Haram to Nigeria and other countries in the region;
(4)
added information regarding efforts by the Department of Defense and Department of State to build the capacity of the Nigerian security forces to combat the threat of Boko Haram;
(5)
added information regarding efforts underway to address poverty and governance in Nigeria to improve the stability of that nation; and
(6)
added an assessment of the efforts of the government of Nigeria to address security challenges and the willingness of that government to cooperate with the efforts of the United States, including efforts to address human rights abuses by the security forces of the government of Nigeria.

Sec. 1523 Limitation on use of funds for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund

added

added None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund until all funds appropriated for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund before the date of the enactment of this Act are obligated or expended.

Sec. 1524 Codification of Office of Management and Budget criteria

added

added The Secretary of Defense shall implement the following criteria in requests for overseas contingency operations:

(1)
added Geographic Area Covered— For theater of operations for non-classified war overseas contingency operations funding, the geographic areas in which combat or direct combat support operations occur are: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrhyzstan, the Horn of Africa, Persian Gulf and Gulf nations, Arabian Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Philippines, and other countries on a case-by-case basis.
(2)
added Permitted Inclusions in the Overseas Contingency Operation Budget—
(A)
added Major Equipment—
(i)
added Replacement of loses that have occurred but only for items not already programmed for replacement in the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP), but not including accelerations, which must be made in the base budget.
(ii)
added Replacement or repair to original capability (to upgraded capability if that is currently available) of equipment returning from theater. The replacement may be a similar end item if the original item is no longer in production. Incremental cost of non-war related upgrades, if made, should be included in the base.
(iii)
added Purchase of specialized, theater-specific equipment.
(iv)
added Funding for major equipment must be obligated within 12 months.
(B)
added Ground Equipment Replacement—
(i)
added For combat losses and returning equipment that is not economical to repair, the replacement of equipment may be given to coalition partners, if consistent with approved policy.
(ii)
added In-theater stocks above customary equipping levels on a case-by-case basis.
(C)
added Equipment Modifications—
(i)
added Operationally-required modifications to equipment used in theater or in direct support of combat operations and that is not already programmed in FYDP.
(ii)
added Funding for equipment modifications must be able be obligated in 12 months.
(D)
added Munitions—
(i)
added Replenishment of munitions expended in combat operations in theater.
(ii)
added Training ammunition for theater-unique training events.
(iii)
added While forecasted expenditures are not permitted, a case-by-case assessment for munitions where existing stocks are insufficient to sustain theater combat operations.
(E)
added Aircraft Replacement—
(i)
added Combat losses by accident that occur in the theater of operations.
(ii)
added Combat losses by enemy action that occur in the theater of operations.
(F)
added Military Construction—
(i)
added Facilities and infrastructure in the theater of operations in direct support of combat operations. The level of construction should be the minimum to meet operational requirements.
(ii)
added At non-enduring locations, facilities and infrastructure for temporary use.
(iii)
added At enduring locations, facilities and infrastructure for temporary use.
(iv)
added At enduring locations, construction requirements must be tied to surge operations or major changes in operational requirements and will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
(G)
added Research and development projects for combat operations in these specific theaters that can be delivered in 12 months.
(H)
added Operations—
(i)
added Direct war costs:
(I)
added Transport of personnel, equipment, and supplies to, from and within the theater of operations.
(II)
added Deployment-specific training and preparation for unites and personnel (military and civilian) to assume their directed missions as defined in the orders for deployment into the theater of operations.
(ii)
added Within the theater, the incremental costs above the funding programmed in the base budget to:
(I)
added Support commanders in the conduct of their directed missions (to include Emergency Response Programs).
(II)
added Build and maintain temporary facilities.
(III)
added Provide food, fuel, supplies, contracted services and other support.
(IV)
added Cover the operational costs of coalition partners supporting United States military missions, as mutually agreed.
(iii)
added Indirect war costs incurred outside the theater of operations will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
(I)
added Health—
(i)
added Short-term care directly related to combat.
(ii)
added Infrastructure that is only to be used during the current conflict.
(J)
added Personnel—
(i)
added Incremental special pays and allowances for Service members and civilians deployed to a combat zone.
(ii)
added Incremental pay, special pays and allowances for Reserve Component personnel mobilized to support war missions.
(K)
added Special Operations Command—
(i)
added Operations that meet the criteria in this guidance.
(ii)
added Equipment that meets the criteria in this guidance.
(L)
added Prepositioned supplies and equipment for resetting in-theater stocks of supplies and equipment to pre-war levels.
(M)
added Security force funding to train, equip, and sustain Iraqi and Afghan military and police forces.
(N)
added Fuel—
(i)
added War fuel costs and funding to ensure that logistical support to combat operations is not degraded due to cash losses in the Department of Defense’s baseline fuel program.
(ii)
added Enough of any base fuel shortfall attributable to fuel price increases to maintain sufficient on-hand cash for the Defense Working Capital Funds to cover seven days disbursements.
(3)
added Excluded items from Overseas Contingency Funding that must be funded from the base budget:
(A)
added Training vehicles, aircraft, ammunition, and simulators, but not training base stocks of specialized, theater-specific equipment that is required to support combat operations in the theater of operations, and support to deployment-specific training described above.
(B)
added Acceleration of equipment service life extension programs already in the Future Years Defense Plan.
(C)
added Base Realignment and Closure projects.
(D)
added Family support initiatives:
(i)
added Construction of childcare facilities.
(ii)
added Funding for private-public partisanships to expand military families’ access to childcare.
(iii)
added Support for service members’ spouses professional development.
(E)
added Programs to maintain industrial base capacity including “war-stoppers”.
(F)
added Personnel:
(i)
added Recruiting and retention bonuses to maintain end-strength.
(ii)
added Basic Pay and the Basic allowances for Housing and Subsistence for permanently authorized end strength.
(iii)
added Individual augmentees on a case-by-case basis.
(G)
added Support for the personnel, operations, or the construction or maintenance of facilities, at United States Offices of Security Cooperation in theater.
(H)
added Costs for reconfiguring prepositioned supplies and equipment or for maintaining them.
(4)
added Special Situations— Items proposed for increases in reprogrammings or as payback for prior reprogrammings must meet the criteria above.

Sec. 1606 Space protection strategy

added

added Section 911(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(4) Fiscal years 2026 through 2030.”

Sec. 1617 Report on governance and corruption in the Russian Federation

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the status of governance and democratization in the Russian Federation.
(b)
added Contents— The report required under subsection (a) shall include—
(1)
added a description of the extent of political and economic corruption among the senior leadership of the Russian Federation; and
(2)
added an analysis of the assets of the senior leadership of the Russian Federation, with a particular focus on the illegal attainment and movement of those assets, including the use of family or friends to hide assets.
(c)
added Form— The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
added Public availability— The Director of National Intelligence shall make publicly available on the Internet the unclassified portion of the report required under subsection (a).

Sec. 1622 Sense of Congress regarding role of National Guard in defense of United States against cyber attacks

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added members of the National Guard may possess knowledge of critical infrastructure in the States in which the members serve that may be of value for purposes of defending such infrastructure against cyber threats;
(2)
added traditional members of the National Guard and National Guard technicians may have experience in both the private and public sector that could benefit the readiness of the Department of Defense’s cyber force and the development of cyber capabilities;
(3)
added the long-standing relationship the National Guard has with local and civil authorities may be beneficial for purposes of providing for a coordinated response to a cyber attack and defending against cyber threats;
(4)
added the States are already working to establish cyber partnerships with the National Guard; and
(5)
added the National Guard has a role in the defense of the United States against cyber threats and consideration should be given to how the National Guard might be integrated into a comprehensive national approach for cyber defense.

Sec. 1623 Director of National Intelligence certification with respect to the mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense

added

added Section 933 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 830) is amended—

(1)
added in subsection (c)—
(A)
added in paragraph (1), by striking “before the submittal of” and all that follows and inserting “or 2015 before the Secretary submits the report required by subsection (d) and the Director of National Intelligence submits a certification described in subsection (g).”; and
(B)
added in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting “and the Director of National Intelligence submits a certification described in subsection (g).”; and
(2)
added by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(g) Director of National Intelligence certification—The Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that the recommendations of the report required under subsection (d) are consistent with the cyber operations capability needs of the United States.”

Sec. 1634 Retention of missile silos

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the Sense of Congress that recent authorization and appropriations Acts passed by Congress and signed by the President have promulgated a national policy that it is in the national security interests of the United States to retain the maximum number of land-based strategic missile silos and their associated infrastructure to ensure that billions of dollars in prior taxpayer investments for such silos and infrastructure are not lost through precipitous actions which may be budget-driven, cyclical, and not in the long-term strategic interests of the United States.
(b)
Requirement— The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to—
(1)
remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the missile field; and
(2)
be made fully operational with a deployed missile.
(c)
removed Termination— The requirement in subsection (b) shall terminate on February 5, 2021.

Sec. 1636 Findings and statement of policy on the nuclear triad

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added The April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review stated—
(A)
added “After considering a wide range of possible options for the U.S. strategic nuclear posture, including some that involved eliminating a leg of the Triad, the NPR concluded that for planned reductions under New START, the United States should retain a smaller Triad of SLBMs [submarine launched ballistic missiles], ICBMs [intercontinental ballistic missiles], and heavy bombers. Retaining all three Triad legs will best maintain strategic stability at reasonable cost, while hedging against potential technical problems or vulnerabilities.”;
(B)
added “ICBMs provide significant advantages to the U.S. nuclear force posture, including extremely secure command and control, high readiness rates, and relatively low operating costs.”;
(C)
added “a survivable U.S. response force requires continuous at-sea deployments of SSBNs [ballistic missile submarines] in both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, as well as the ability to surge additional submarines in crisis.”; and
(D)
added nuclear-capable bombers—
(i)
added “[provide] a rapid and effective hedge against technical challenges with another leg of the Triad, as well as geopolitical uncertainties”; and
(ii)
added “are important to extended deterrence of potential attacks on U.S. allies and partners.”.
(2)
added In a letter to the Senate on February 2, 2011, regarding the New START Treaty, President Obama stated that “I intend to modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems: a heavy bomber and air- launched cruise missile, an ICBM, and a nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) and SLBM.”.
(3)
added In the Resolution Of Advice And Consent To Ratification of the New START Treaty, the Senate stated that “it is the sense of the Senate that United States deterrence and flexibility is assured by a robust triad of strategic delivery vehicles. To this end, the United States is committed to accomplishing the modernization and replacement of its strategic nuclear delivery vehicles, and to ensuring the continued flexibility of United States conventional and nuclear delivery systems.”.
(4)
added On June 19, 2013, the Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, stated, “First, the U.S. will maintain a ready and credible deterrent. Second, we will retain a triad of bombers, ICBMs, and ballistic missile submarines. Third, we will make sure that our nuclear weapons remain safe, secure, ready and effective.”.
(5)
added Section 1062 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 495 note) states that—
(A)
added “It is the policy of the United States to modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems”; and
(B)
added “Congress supports the modernization or replacement of the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise missile, an intercontinental ballistic missile, and a ballistic missile submarine and submarine launched ballistic missile”.
(6)
added On March 6, 2014, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that the Joint Chiefs of Staff have determined that “our recommendation is to remain firmly committed to the triad, the three legs of the nuclear capability, and that any further reduction should be done only through negotiations, not unilaterally, and that we should commit to modernizing the stockpile while we have it.”.
(7)
added On April 2, 2014, the Commander of United States Strategic Command, Admiral Cecil Haney, testified to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that “First and foremost, I think it is important that we as a country realize just how important and foundational our strategic deterrent is today for us and well into the future. As you have mentioned, there is a need for modernization in a variety of areas. When you look at the credible strategic deterrent we have today, that includes everything from the indications and warning, to the command and control and communication structure that goes all the way from the President down to the units, and to what frequently we talk about as the triad involving the intercontinental ballistic missiles, the submarines, and the bombers—each providing its unique aspect of deterrence.”.
(8)
added In the June 2013 Report on Nuclear Employment Strategy of the United States required by section 491 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the President, stated that “the United States will maintain a nuclear Triad, consisting of ICBMs, SLBMs, and nuclear-capable heavy bombers. Retaining all three Triad legs will best maintain strategic stability at reasonable cost, while hedging against potential technical problems or vulnerabilities. These forces should be operated on a day-to-day basis in a manner that maintains strategic stability with Russia and China, deters potential regional adversaries, and assures U.S. Allies and partners.”.
(b)
added Statement of policy— It is the policy of the United States—
(1)
added to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of—
(A)
added heavy bombers equipped with nuclear gravity bombs and air-launched nuclear cruise missiles;
(B)
added land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles equipped with nuclear warheads that are capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles; and
(C)
added ballistic missile submarines equipped with submarine launched ballistic missiles and multiple nuclear warheads.
(2)
added to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace a capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons and dual-capable fighter-bomber aircraft;
(3)
added to deter potential adversaries and assure allies and partners of the United States through strong and long-term commitment to the nuclear deterrent of the United States and the personnel, systems, and infrastructure that comprise such deterrent; and
(4)
added to ensure the members of the Armed Forces that operate the nuclear deterrent of the United States have the training, resources, and national support required to execute the critical national security mission of the members.

Sec. 1637 Improvement to biennial assessment on delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and the nuclear command and control system

added

added Section 492(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, and the ability to meet operational availability requirements for,” after “military effectiveness of”.

Sec. 1638 Reports and briefings of Strategic Advisory Group

added

added Not later than 30 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress, under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, a budget for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees each report and briefing provided by the Strategic Advisory Group established pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), including any subgroup thereof and any successor advisory group, to the Commander during the one-year period preceding the date of such submission. The Commander may include with each such submission any additional views the Commander determines appropriate.

Sec. 1639 Limitation on availability of funds for removal or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft from Europe

added
(a)
added Limitation—
(1)
added In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used for the removal or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft from the area of responsibility of the United States European Command until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(A)
added the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(B)
added the Russian Federation is no longer violating the INF Treaty; and
(C)
added the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations.
(2)
added Exception— The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply in instances where a dual-capable aircraft is being replaced by an F–35 aircraft.
(b)
added Waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a)(1) if—
(1)
added the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A)
added a notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States and a description of the national security interest covered by the waiver;
(B)
added certification that such consolidation is consistent with the policy established in the NATO Deterrence and Defense Posture Review of 2012 concerning reciprocal non-strategic nuclear weapons reductions by the Russian Federation; and
(C)
added a report, in unclassified form, explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot make the certification under subsection (a)(1); and
(2)
added a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the report under paragraph (1)(C).
(c)
added Report— The Secretary of Defense shall provide a report on the cost and burden sharing arrangements of forward-deployed nuclear weapons in place with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its members and any recommendations for changes to these arrangements.
(d)
added Definitions— In this section:
(1)
added The term “CFE Treaty” means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(2)
added The “dual-capable aircraft” means tactical fighter aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions.
(3)
added The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987 and entered into force June 1, 1988.

Sec. 1640 Annual Congressional Budget Office review of cost estimates for nuclear weapons

added

added Section 1041(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1931) is amended—

(1)
added in the subsection heading, by inserting “Annual” before “CBO”; and
(2)
added by inserting “and annually thereafter,” after “this Act,”.

Sec. 1642 Sense of Congress on procurement and deployment of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle

changed It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should not procure an additional capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a successful operationally realistic intercept flight test of the capability enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm line for the industrial base.

Sec. 1643 Procurement authority for specified fuzes

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of covered parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze.
(b)
added Availability of funds— Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $4,500,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under subsection (a).
(c)
added Covered parts defined— In this section, the term “covered parts” means commercial off-the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code.

Sec. 1644 Plan to counter certain ground-launched ballistic missiles and cruise missiles

added
(a)
added Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
added On March 5, 2014, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Missile Defense Policy testified before the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate that “[w]e are concerned about Russian activity that appears to be inconsistent with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. We’ve raised the issue with Russia. They provided an answer that was not satisfactory to us, and we will, we told them that the issue is not closed, and we will continue to raise this.” Congress shares this concern regarding Russian behavior that is “inconsistent with” or in violation or circumvention of the INF Treaty.
(2)
added The Commander of the United States European Command, and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, stated on April 2, 2014, that “a weapon capability that violates the INF, that is introduced into the greater European land mass is absolutely a tool that will have to be dealt with * * * I would not judge how the alliance will choose to react, but I would say they will have to consider what to do about it * * * It can’t go unanswered.”.
(3)
added The Director of the Missile Defense Agency stated on March 25, 2014, that Aegis Ashore missile defense sites, including those to be deployed in the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Romania, could be reconfigured to deal with the threat of intermediate-range ground launched cruise missiles with modest changes to “the software, [and] with a minor hardware addition.”.
(4)
added The “Report on Conventional Prompt Global Strike Options if Exempt from the Restrictions of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics” provided to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in September 2013 by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stated, “[i]n the absence of the INF Treaty, four types of weapons systems could assist in closing the existing JROC-validated capability gap: (1) Modifications to existing short range or tactical weapon systems to extend range; (2) Forward-based, ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCMs); (3) Forward-based, ground-launched intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs); and (4) Forward-based, ground-launched intermediate-range missiles with trajectory shaping vehicles (TSVs).”.
(5)
added The report further stated that, “[b]ecause of INF restrictions, examination of prohibited concepts has not been performed by industry or the Services. Trade studies regarding capability, affordability, and development timelines would have to be completed prior to providing an accurate estimate of cost, technology risk, and timeline advantages that could be achieved with respect to these concepts. Extensive knowledge could be leveraged from past and current land- and sea-based systems to assist in potential development and deployment of these currently prohibited concepts.”.
(6)
added President Obama stated in Prague in April 2009 that “Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.”.
(7)
added The Nuclear Posture Review of 2010 stated, “it is not enough to detect non-compliance; violators must know that they will face consequences when they are caught.”.
(8)
added The July 2010 Verifiability Assessment released by the Department of State on the New START Treaty, and as quoted in a hearing of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, stated: “[t]he costs and risks of Russian cheating or breakout, on the other hand, would likely be very significant” and that the Russian Federation would be unlikely to cheat because of the “financial and international political costs of such an action.”.
(b)
added Plan for testing of Aegis Ashore—
(1)
added In general— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall develop a plan to test, by not later than December 31, 2015, the capability of the Aegis Ashore system, including pursuant to any appropriate modifications to the hardware or software of such system, to counter intermediate-range ground launched cruise missiles.
(2)
added Submission— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan under paragraph (1), including, if determined appropriate by the Director, whether the Director determines that such plan should be implemented.
(c)
added Plan to develop certain ground-launched ballistic missiles and cruise missiles— If, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Russian Federation is not in complete and verifiable compliance with its obligations under the INF Treaty, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
added develop a plan for the research and development of intermediate range ballistic and cruise missiles, including through trade studies regarding capability, affordability, and development timelines, for which there are validated military requirements; and
(2)
added by not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the congressional defense committees the plan developed under paragraph (1), including, if determined appropriate by the Secretary, whether the Secretary determines that such plan should be implemented.
(d)
added INF Treaty defined— The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.

Sec. 1645 Study on testing program of ground-based midcourse missile defense system

added
(a)
added Study— The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an arrangement with the Institute for Defense Analyses under which the Institute shall carry out a study on the testing program of the ground based midcourse missile defense system.
(b)
added Elements— The study under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An assessment of whether the testing program described in subsection (a) has established, as of the date of the study, that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system will perform reliably and effectively under realistic operational conditions, including an explanation of the degree of confidence supporting such assessment.
(2)
added An assessment of whether the currently planned testing program, if implemented, is sufficient to establish that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system will perform both reliably and effectively against current and plausible near- and medium-term ballistic missile threats under realistic operational conditions, and if any gaps are identified, an evaluation of what improvements could be made to the testing program to achieve reasonable confidence that the system would be reliable and effective under realistic operational conditions.
(3)
added Any necessary recommendations to improve the effectiveness and reliability of the ground-based midcourse missile defense system.
(c)
added Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the study.

Sec. 1646 Budget increase for Aegis ballistic missile defense

added
(a)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, for Aegis BMD (Line 030) is hereby increased by $99,000,000.
(b)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D—
(1)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 101 for aircraft procurement, Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, for Aerial Common Sensor (Line 003) is hereby reduced by $75,300,000; and
(2)
added the amounts authorized to be appropriated in section 1405 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for operation and maintenance pertaining to implementation of benefit reform proposals, is hereby reduced by $23,700,000.

Sec. 1701 Findings and purposes

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
changed Congress remains steadfast in supporting the continuing efforts of the Department of Defense to produce auditable financial statements. Such efforts are essential to ensure taxpayers dollars are accounted for at the largest department of the Federal GovernmentGovernment.
(2)
As the 2017 and 2019 statutory audit deadlines approach, Congress believes an advisory panel is necessary to better track the Department’s progress.
(b)
Purposes— The purposes of the Advisory Panel are—
(1)
to work on behalf of Congress to actively monitor the audit readiness work of the Department of Defense and, after September 30, 2017, the Department’s 2018 audit; and
(2)
to regularly providing interim findings and recommendations to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, with the purpose of making the Department auditable and aiding in oversight of the Department by such Committees.

Sec. 1703 Duties of the Advisory Panel

(a)
In general— The duties of the Advisory Panel are as follows:
(1)
To provide the Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), independent advice on the Department’s financial management, including the financial reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit process, and processes for monitoring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
(2)
To identify, review, and evaluate the work of the Department of Defense (including the work of each military department and Defense Agency) on auditability.
(3)
To identify problem areas and recommend solutions in order to aid the Department in meeting the following statutory deadlines:
(A)
By not later than September 30, 2017, validating the financial statements of the Department of Defense as ready for audit, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).
(B)
changed By not later than March 31, 2019, auditing the financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(a)(iii) of such Act (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note)note).
(4)
To provide briefings regularly to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the Advisory Panel’s findings, analysis, and recommendations.
(b)
Reports— Not later than March 31 and September 30 of each year during the life of the Advisory Panel, beginning with March 31, 2015, the Advisory Panel shall submit to the congressional defense committees findings and conclusions of the Advisory Panel as a result of its work under subsection (a) during the period covered by the report, together with such recommendations as it considers appropriate.
(c)
Authority of Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)— In accordance with Department policy and procedures, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is authorized to act upon the advice emanating from the Advisory Panel.

Sec. 2304 Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project

added In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 992) relating to Saipan for the construction of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport storage facility in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out such construction at any suitable location in the Northern Mariana Islands.

(a)
removed Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) and extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b)
removed Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2305 Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project

(a)
changed Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 2011 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 111–383; 124 Stat. 1660), 4436), the authorizations authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 (124 Stat. 1670), 4444) and extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b)
Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2306 Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects

added
(a)
added Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b)
added Table— The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:

Sec. 2611 Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects

(a)
Modification—
(1)
Kansas city— In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas, instead of constructing a new facility in Kansas City.
(2)
changed Attleboro— In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts, instead of constructing a new facility in Attleboro, .Attleboro.
(b)
Extension— Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later.

Sec. 2805 Report on Prevalence of Black Mold in Buildings Located on Military Installations

added
(a)
added Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall report to Congress on the prevalence of black mold in buildings located on military installations.
(b)
added Action required— Based on the report required under subsection (a), buildings identified in such report as containing black mold shall be added to the appropriate branch’s construction priority list for building replacement or renovation.

Sec. 2817 Sense of Congress on national security and public lands

added

added It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)
added national defense should be the top priority for all aspects of the Federal Government; and
(2)
added national security functions, such as military training and exercises, should be the top priority, particularly with regard to the use of land owned by the United States.

Sec. 2818 Use of former bombardment area on island of Culebra, Puerto Rico

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the statutory prohibition restricting environmental cleanup of the former bombardment area on the island of Culebra, Puerto Rico, is a unique anomaly for the Department of Defense and its formerly used defense sites.
(b)
added Modification of restriction on Federal decontamination authority— Section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The first sentence of this subsection shall not apply to the portions of the former bombardment area that were identified as having regular public access in the Department of Defense study entitled “Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment Area of Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico” and dated April 20, 2012, which was prepared in accordance with section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4464).”.

Sec. 2819 Indemnification of transferees of property at military installations closed since October 24, 1988, that remain under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense

added

added Section 330(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended—

(1)
added in paragraph (1)—
(A)
added by striking “paragraph (3)” and inserting “paragraph (4)”; and
(B)
added by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraph (3)”;
(2)
added by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively;
(3)
added in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by striking “paragraph (2) contributed to any such release or threatened release, paragraph (1)” and inserting “paragraph (3) contributed to any such release or threatened release, paragraph (1) or (2)”; and
(4)
added by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):

added “(2) The responsibility of the Secretary of Defense to hold harmless, defend, and indemnify in full certain persons and entities described in paragraph (3) also applies with respect to any military installation (or portion thereof) that—

added “(A) was closed during the period beginning on October 24, 1988, and ending on the date of the enactment of this paragraph, other than pursuant to a base closure law; and

added “(B) remains under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense as of the date of the enactment of this paragraph.”

Sec. 2832 Establishment of surface danger zone, Ritidian Unit, Guam National Wildlife Refuge

added
(a)
added Agreement to establish— In order to accommodate the operation of a live-fire training range complex on Andersen Air Force Base-Northwest Field and the management of the adjacent Ritidian Unit of the Guam National Wildlife Refuge, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior, notwithstanding the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), may enter into an agreement providing for the establishment and operation of a surface danger zone which overlays the Ritidian Unit or such portion thereof as the Secretaries consider necessary.
(b)
added Elements of agreement— The agreement to establish a surface danger zone over all or a portion of the Ritidian Unit of the Guam National Wildlife Refuge shall include—
(1)
added measures to maintain the purposes of the Refuge; and
(2)
added as appropriate, measures, funded by the Secretary of the Navy from funds appropriated after the date of enactment of this Act and otherwise available to the Secretary, for the following purposes:
(A)
added Relocation and reconstruction of structures and facilities of the Refuge in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(B)
added Mitigation of impacts to wildlife species present on the Refuge or to be reintroduced in the future in accordance with applicable laws.
(C)
added Use of Department of Defense personnel to undertake conservation activities within the Ritidian Unit normally performed by Department of the Interior personnel, including habitat maintenance, maintaining the boundary fence, and conducting the brown tree snake eradication program.
(D)
added Openings and closures of the surface danger zone to the public as may be necessary.

Sec. 2849 Land conveyance, former Air Force Norwalk Defense Fuel Supply Point, Norwalk, California

added
(a)
added Conveyance authorized— The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the City of Norwalk, California (in this section referred to as the “City”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 15 acres at the former Norwalk Defense Fuel Supply Point for public purposes.
(b)
added Application of environmental laws— Nothing in this section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, or local environmental laws and regulations, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of the Air Force.
(c)
added Payment of cost of conveyance—
(1)
added Payment required— The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2)
added Treatment of amounts received—
(A)
added Subject to subparagraph (B), amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(B)
added Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) are subject to appropriations.
(d)
added Description of property— The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Air Force.
(e)
added Additional terms— The Secretary of the Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Sec. 2867 Ensuring public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument

added
(a)
added In general— The Secretary of the Interior, acting as the administrator of land owned by the Office of Environmental Management of the Department of Energy known as the “Hanford Reach National Monument”, shall provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and other purposes, including—
(1)
added motor vehicle access; and
(2)
added pedestrian and other nonmotorized access.
(b)
added Cooperative agreements— The Secretary of the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to facilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain—
(1)
added with the Secretary of Energy, the State of Washington, or any local government agency or other interested persons, for guided tours, including guided motorized tours to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain; and
(2)
added with the Secretary of Energy, and with the State of Washington or any local government agency or other interested persons, to maintain the access road to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain.

Sec. 2941 Additional withdrawal and reservation of public land to support White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

Section 2951(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1039) is amended—

(1)
by striking “The Federal land” and inserting the following:

“(1) Initial withdrawal—The Federal land”

(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

changed “(2) Northern Extension Area—The Federal land referred to in subsection (a) also includes the Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management located beneath the boundaries of the Special Use Airspace Areas designated as R-5107C R–5107C and R-5107H R–5107H for White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, as described in Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7400.8W dated February 16, 2014.”

Sec. 3117 Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium

(a)
Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility—
(1)
In general— Of the funds described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and program support activities relating to the MOX facility.
(2)
Funds described— The funds described in this paragraph are the following:
(A)
Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and program support activities.
(B)
Funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year prior to fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and program support activities that are unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Study—
(1)
In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to assess and validate the analysis of the Secretary of Energy with respect to surplus weapon-grade plutonium options.
(2)
Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any findings and recommendations.
(c)
Report—
(1)
Plan— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (b)(1).
(2)
Elements included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
The study conducted by the federally funded research and development center under subsection (b)(1), without change.
(B)
Identification of the alternatives to the MOX facility considered by the Secretary, including a life-cycle cost analysis for each such alternative.
(C)
Identification of the portions of such life cycle cost analyses that are common to all such alternatives.
(D)
Discussion on continuation of the MOX facility, including a future funding profile or a detailed discussion of selected alternatives determined appropriate by the Secretary for such discussion.
(E)
Discussion of the issues regarding implementation of such selected alternatives, including all regulatory and public acceptance issues, including interactions with affected States.
(F)
Explanation of how the alternatives to the MOX facility conform with the Plutonium Disposition Agreement, and if an alternative does not so conform, what measures must be taken to ensure conformance.
(G)
Identification of steps the Secretary would have to take to close out all MOX facility related activities, as well as the associated cost.
(H)
Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
(d)
added Exclusion of certain options—
(1)
added In general— The study under subsection (b)(1) and the report under subsection (c)(1) shall not include any assessment or discussion of options that involve moving plutonium to a State where the Federal Government—
(A)
added is not meeting all legally binding deadlines and milestones required under the Tri-Party Agreement and the Consent Decree;
(B)
added has provided notification that any element of the Tri-Party Agreement or the Consent Decree is at risk of being breached; or
(C)
added is in dispute resolution with the State regarding the Tri-Party Agreement or the Consent Decree.
(2)
added Definitions— In this subsection:
(A)
added The term “Tri-Party Agreement” means the comprehensive cleanup and compliance agreement between the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the State of Washington entered into on May 15, 1989.
(B)
added The term “Consent Decree” means the legal agreement between the Secretary of Energy and the State of Washington finalized in 2010.
(e)
renumbered was (5) Definitions— In this section:
(1)
renumbered was (5)(3) The term “MOX facility” means the mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
(2)
renumbered was (5)(4) The term “Plutonium Disposition Agreement” means the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated As No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation, as amended.
(3)
renumbered was (5)(5) The term “program support activities” means activities that support the design, long-lead equipment procurement, and site preparation of the MOX facility.

Sec. 3134 Plan for verification and monitoring of proliferation of nuclear weapons and fissile material

added
(a)
added Plan— The President, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall develop an interagency plan for verification and monitoring relating to the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons, components of such weapons, and fissile material.
(b)
added Elements— The plan developed under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
added An interagency plan and road map for verification and monitoring, with respect to policy, operations, and research, development, testing, and evaluation, including—
(A)
added identifying requirements (including funding requirements) for such verification and monitoring; and
(B)
added identifying and integrating roles, responsibilities, and planning for such verification and monitoring.
(2)
added An engagement plan for building cooperation and transparency to improve inspections and monitoring.
(3)
added A research and development program to—
(A)
added improve monitoring, detection, and in-field inspection and analysis capabilities, including persistent surveillance, remote monitoring, rapid analysis of large data sets, including open-source data; and
(B)
added coordinate technical and operational requirements early in the process.
(4)
added Engagement of relevant departments and agencies of the Federal Government and the military departments (including the Open Source Center and the United States Atomic Energy Detection System), national laboratories, industry, and academia.
(c)
added Submission—
(1)
added In general— Not later than September 1, 2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the plan developed under subsection (a).
(2)
added Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following:
(A)
added The congressional defense committees.
(B)
added The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(C)
added The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(D)
added The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.
(E)
added The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 3141 Technical corrections to Atomic Energy Defense Act

(a)
Definitions— Section 4002(3) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(3)) is amended by striking “Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 401 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 435 note),” and inserting “Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 3001 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note), Executive Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note),”.
(b)
Management structure— Section 4102(b)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2512(b)(3)) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “for improving the”;
(2)
in subparagraph (A), by inserting “for improving the” before “governance”; and
(3)
in subparagraph (B), by inserting “relating to” before “any other”.
(c)
Stockpile stewardship— Section 4203(d)(4)(A)(i) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(d)(4)(A)(i)) is amended by striking “50 U.S.C. 404a” and inserting “50 U.S.C. 3043”.
(d)
Reports on stockpile— Section 4205(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)(2)) is amended by striking “commander” and inserting “Commander”.
(e)
Advice on reliability of stockpile— Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (d), by striking “commander” and inserting “Commander”; and
(2)
in subsection (e)(1), by striking “representatives” and inserting “a representative”.
(f)
Disposition of certain plutonium— Section 4306 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2566) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(6)(C), by striking “paragraph (A)” and inserting “subparagraph (A)”;
(2)
in subsection (c)(2), by striking “2002” and inserting “2002,”; and
(3)
in subsection (d)(3), by inserting “of Energy” after “Department”.
(g)
changed Limitation on use of funds in relation to F-Canyon F–Canyon Facility— Section 4454 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2638) is amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting “of” after “assessment”.
(h)
Inspections of certain facilities— Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking “nuclear weapons facility” and inserting “national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility”.
(i)
Notice relating to certain failures— Section 4505 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b), by striking the subsection heading and inserting the following: “Significant atomic energy defense intelligence losses”; and
(2)
in subsection (e)(2), by striking “50 U.S.C. 413” and inserting “50 U.S.C. 3091”.
(j)
Review of certain documents before declassification and release— Section 4521(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671(b)) is amended by striking “Executive Order 12958” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”.
(k)
Protection against release of Restricted Data— Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”;
(2)
in subsection (b)(1), by striking “Executive Order No. 12958” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526”;
(3)
in subsection (f)(2), by striking “Executive Order No. 12958” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526”.
(l)
Identification of declassification activities in budget materials— Section 4525(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675(a)) is amended by striking “Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”.
(m)
Workforce restructuring plan— Section 4604(f)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704(f)(3)) is amended by striking “Nevada and” and inserting “Nevada, and”.
(n)
Availability of funds— Section 4709(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2749(b)) is amended by striking “athorization” and inserting “authorization”.
(o)
Transfer of defense environmental cleanup funds— Section 4710(b)(3)(B) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750(b)(3)(B)) is amended by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”.
(p)
Restriction on use of funds to pay certain penalties— Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended—
(1)
by inserting an em dash after “Department of Energy if”;
(2)
by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be indented two ems from the left margin; and
(3)
in paragraph (1), by striking “, or” and inserting “; or”.
(q)
Research and development by certain facilities— Section 4832(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812(a)) is amended by striking “for Nuclear Security”.
(r)
Report on Hanford tank safety— Section 4441 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2621) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(s)
Critical technology partnerships— Section 4813(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794(a)) is amended by striking “that atomic energy defense activities research on, and development of, any dual-use critical technology” and inserting “that research on and development of dual-use critical technology carried out through atomic energy defense activities”.
(t)
Table of contents— The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4710 and inserting the following:

Sec. 3142 Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security Administration Act

(a)
Status of certain personnel— Section 3220(c) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2410(c)) is amended—
(1)
by inserting an em dash after “activities between”;
(2)
by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be indented two ems from the left margin; and
(3)
in paragraph (1), by striking “, and” and inserting “; and”.
(b)
Congressional oversight of certain programs— Section 3236(a)(2)(B)(iv) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2426(a)(2)(B)(iv)) is amended—
(1)
by inserting an em dash after “program for”;
(2)
changed by realigning subclauses (I), (II), and (III) so as to be indented six ems from the left margin; andmargin;
(3)
changed in subclause (I), by striking “year,” and inserting “year;” “year;”; and
(4)
in subclause (II), by striking “, and” and inserting “; and”.

Sec. 3143 Budget increase for defense environmental cleanup

added
(a)
added Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 3102 for defense environmental cleanup, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4701, is hereby increased by $20,000,000.
(b)
added Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this title for weapons activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4701, for Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign is hereby reduced by $20,000,000.

Sec. 3502 Special rule for DD–17

(a)
changed In general— A vessel of the Navy transported in DD-17 DD–17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) USN–YFD–17) in the waters of the State of Alabama shall not be treated as merchandise for purposes of section 55102 of title 46, United States Code.
(b)
changed Limitation— If DD-17 DD–17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) USN–YFD–17) is sold after the date of the enactment of this Act, subsection (a) shall cease to have effect unless the purchaser of DD-17 DD–17 is an eligible owner described in section 12103(b) of title 46, United States Code.

Sec. 5001 Short title

added

added This division may be cited as the “Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act”.

Sec. 5002 Table of contents

added

added The table of contents for this division is as follows:

Sec. 5003 Definitions

added

added In this division:

(1)
added Chief acquisition officers council— The term “Chief Acquisition Officers Council” means the Chief Acquisition Officers Council established by section 1311(a) of title 41, United States Code.
(2)
added Chief information officer— The term “Chief Information Officer” means a Chief Information Officer (as designated under section 3506(a)(2) of title 44, United States Code) of an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code.
(3)
added Chief information officers council— The term “Chief Information Officers Council” or “CIO Council” means the Chief Information Officers Council established by section 3603(a) of title 44, United States Code.
(4)
added Director— The term “Director” means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
(5)
added Federal agency— The term “Federal agency” means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code.
(6)
added Federal chief information officer— The term “Federal Chief Information Officer” means the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44, United States Code.
(7)
added Information technology or it— The term “information technology” or “IT” has the meaning provided in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code.
(8)
added Relevant congressional committees— The term “relevant congressional committees” means each of the following:
(A)
added The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(B)
added The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

Sec. 5101 Increased authority of agency Chief Information Officers over information technology

added
(a)
added Presidential appointment of CIOs of certain agencies—
(1)
added In general— Section 11315 of title 40, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by redesignating subsection (a) as subsection (e) and moving such subsection to the end of the section; and
(B)
added by inserting before subsection (b) the following new subsection (a):

added “(a) Presidential appointment or designation of certain chief information officers

added “(1) In general—There shall be within each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) of title 31 an agency Chief Information Officer. Each agency Chief Information Officer shall—

added “(A)

added “(i) be appointed by the President; or

added “(ii) be designated by the President, in consultation with the head of the agency; and

added “(B) be appointed or designated, as applicable, from among individuals who possess demonstrated ability in general management of, and knowledge of and extensive practical experience in, information technology management practices in large governmental or business entities.

added “(2) Responsibilities—An agency Chief Information Officer appointed or designated under this section shall report directly to the head of the agency and carry out, on a full-time basis, responsibilities as set forth in this section and in section 3506(a) of title 44 for Chief Information Officers designated under paragraph (2) of such section.”

(2)
added Conforming amendments— Section 3506(a)(2) of title 44, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by striking “(A) Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the head of each agency” and inserting “The head of each agency, other than an agency with a Presidentially appointed or designated Chief Information Officer as provided in section 11315(a)(1) of title 40,”; and
(B)
added by striking subparagraph (B).
(b)
added Authority relating to budget and personnel— Section 11315 of title 40, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection:

added “(d) Additional authorities for certain CIOs

added “(1) Budget-related authority

added “(A) Planning—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31 and in section 102 of title 5 shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has the authority to participate in decisions regarding the budget planning process related to information technology or programs that include significant information technology components.

added “(B) Allocation—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts appropriated for any agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31 and in section 102 of title 5 for any fiscal year that are available for information technology shall be allocated within the agency, consistent with the provisions of appropriations Acts and budget guidelines and recommendations from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in such manner as specified by, or approved by, the Chief Information Officer of the agency in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the agency and budget officials.

added “(2) Personnel-related authority—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31 shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has the authority necessary to approve the hiring of personnel who will have information technology responsibilities within the agency and to require that such personnel have the obligation to report to the Chief Information Officer in a manner considered sufficient by the Chief Information Officer.”

(c)
added Single chief information officer in each agency—
(1)
added Requirement— Section 3506(a)(3) of title 44, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
added by inserting “(A)” after “(3)”; and
(B)
added by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

added “(B) Each agency shall have only one individual with the title and designation of “Chief Information Officer”. Any bureau, office, or subordinate organization within the agency may designate one individual with the title “Deputy Chief Information Officer”, “Associate Chief Information Officer”, or “Assistant Chief Information Officer”.”

(2)
added Effective date— Section 3506(a)(3)(B) of title 44, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall take effect as of October 1, 2014. Any individual serving in a position affected by such section before such date may continue in that position if the requirements of such section are fulfilled with respect to that individual.

Sec. 5102 Lead coordination role of Chief Information Officers Council

added
(a)
added Lead coordination role— Subsection (d) of section 3603 of title 44, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

added “(d) Lead interagency forum

added “(1) In general—The Council is designated the lead interagency forum for improving agency coordination of practices related to the design, development, modernization, use, operation, sharing, performance, and review of Federal Government information resources investment. As the lead interagency forum, the Council shall develop cross-agency portfolio management practices to allow and encourage the development of cross-agency shared services and shared platforms. The Council shall also issue guidelines and practices for infrastructure and common information technology applications, including expansion of the Federal Enterprise Architecture process if appropriate. The guidelines and practices may address broader transparency, common inputs, common outputs, and outcomes achieved. The guidelines and practices shall be used as a basis for comparing performance across diverse missions and operations in various agencies.

added “(2) Report—Not later than December 1 in each of the 6 years following the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Council shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report (to be known as the “CIO Council Report”) summarizing the Council’s activities in the preceding fiscal year and containing such recommendations for further congressional action to fulfill its mission as the Council considers appropriate.

added “(3) Relevant congressional committees—For purposes of the report required by paragraph (2), the relevant congressional committees are each of the following:

added “(A) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

added “(B) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.”

(b)
added References to administrator of E-Government as federal chief information officer—
(1)
added References— Section 3602(b) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “The Administrator may also be referred to as the Federal Chief Information Officer.”.
(2)
added Definition— Section 3601(1) of such title is amended by inserting “or Federal Chief Information Officer” before “means”.

Sec. 5103 Reports by Government Accountability Office

added
(a)
added Requirement to examine effectiveness— The Comptroller General of the United States shall examine the effectiveness of the Chief Information Officers Council in meeting its responsibilities under section 3603(d) of title 44, United States Code, as added by section 5102, with particular focus on whether agencies are actively participating in the Council and heeding the Council’s advice and guidance.
(b)
added Reports— Not later than 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report containing the findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General from the examination required by subsection (a).

Sec. 5201 Purpose

added

added The purpose of this title is to optimize Federal data center usage and efficiency.

Sec. 5202 Definitions

added

added In this title:

(1)
added Federal data center optimization initiative— The term “Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative” or the “Initiative” means the initiative developed and implemented by the Director, through the Federal Chief Information Officer, as required under section 5203.
(2)
added Covered agency— The term “covered agency” means any agency included in the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative.
(3)
added Data center— The term “data center” means a closet, room, floor, or building for the storage, management, and dissemination of data and information, as defined by the Federal Chief Information Officer under guidance issued pursuant to this section.
(4)
added Federal data center— The term “Federal data center” means any data center of a covered agency used or operated by a covered agency, by a contractor of a covered agency, or by another organization on behalf of a covered agency.
(5)
added Server utilization— The term “server utilization” refers to the activity level of a server relative to its maximum activity level, expressed as a percentage.
(6)
added Power usage effectiveness— The term “power usage effectiveness” means the ratio obtained by dividing the total amount of electricity and other power consumed in running a data center by the power consumed by the information and communications technology in the data center.

Sec. 5203 Federal data center optimization initiative

added
(a)
added Requirement for initiative— The Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, shall develop and implement an initiative, to be known as the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative, to optimize the usage and efficiency of Federal data centers by meeting the requirements of this division and taking additional measures, as appropriate.
(b)
added Requirement for plan— Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, shall develop and submit to Congress a plan for implementation of the Initiative required by subsection (a) by each covered agency. In developing the plan, the Federal Chief Information Officer shall take into account the findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General review required by section 5205(e).
(c)
added Matters covered— The plan shall include—
(1)
added descriptions of how covered agencies will use reductions in floor space, energy use, infrastructure, equipment, applications, personnel, increases in multiorganizational use, server virtualization, cloud computing, and other appropriate methods to meet the requirements of the initiative; and
(2)
added appropriate consideration of shifting Federally owned data center workload to commercially owned data centers.

Sec. 5204 Performance requirements related to data center consolidation

added
(a)
added Server utilization— Each covered agency may use the following methods to achieve the maximum server utilization possible as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer:
(1)
added The closing of existing data centers that lack adequate server utilization, as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer. If the agency fails to close such data centers, the agency shall provide a detailed explanation as to why this data center should remain in use as part of the submitted plan. The Federal Chief Information Officer shall include an assessment of the agency explanation in the annual report to Congress.
(2)
added The consolidation of services within existing data centers to increase server utilization rates.
(3)
added Any other method that the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, determines necessary to optimize server utilization.
(b)
added Power usage effectiveness— Each covered agency may use the following methods to achieve the maximum energy efficiency possible as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer:
(1)
added The use of the measurement of power usage effectiveness to calculate data center energy efficiency.
(2)
added The use of power meters in facilities dedicated to data center operations to frequently measure power consumption over time.
(3)
added The establishment of power usage effectiveness goals for each data center.
(4)
added The adoption of best practices for managing—
(A)
added temperature and airflow in facilities dedicated to data center operations; and
(B)
added power supply efficiency.
(5)
added The implementation of any other method that the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of covered agencies, determines necessary to optimize data center energy efficiency.

Sec. 5205 Cost savings related to data center optimization

added
(a)
added Requirement To track costs—
(1)
added In general— Each covered agency shall track costs resulting from implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative within the agency and submit a report on those costs annually to the Federal Chief Information Officer. Covered agencies shall determine the net costs from data consolidation on an annual basis.
(2)
added Factors— In calculating net costs each year under paragraph (1), a covered agency shall use the following factors:
(A)
added Energy costs.
(B)
added Personnel costs.
(C)
added Real estate costs.
(D)
added Capital expense costs.
(E)
added Maintenance and support costs such as operating subsystem, database, hardware, and software license expense costs.
(F)
added Other appropriate costs, as determined by the agency in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer.
(b)
added Requirement To track savings—
(1)
added In general— Each covered agency shall track realized and projected savings resulting from implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative within the agency and submit a report on those savings annually to the Federal Chief Information Officer. Covered agencies shall determine the net savings from data consolidation on an annual basis.
(2)
added Factors— In calculating net savings each year under paragraph (1), a covered agency shall use the following factors:
(A)
added Energy savings.
(B)
added Personnel savings.
(C)
added Real estate savings.
(D)
added Capital expense savings.
(E)
added Maintenance and support savings such as operating subsystem, database, hardware, and software license expense savings.
(F)
added Other appropriate savings, as determined by the agency in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer.
(3)
added Public availability— The Federal Chief Information Officer shall make publicly available a summary of realized and projected savings for each covered agency. The Federal Chief Information Officer shall identify any covered agency that failed to provide the annual report required under paragraph (1).
(c)
added Requirement To use cost-Effective measures— Covered agencies shall use the most cost-effective measures to implement the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative, such as using estimation to measure or track costs and savings using a methodology approved by the Federal Chief Information Officer.
(d)
added Government accountability office review— Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall examine methods for calculating savings from the Initiative and using them for the purposes identified in subsection (d), including establishment and use of a special revolving fund that supports data centers and server optimization, and shall submit to the Federal Chief Information Officer and Congress a report on the Comptroller General’s findings and recommendations.

Sec. 5206 Reporting requirements to Congress and the Federal Chief Information Officer

added
(a)
added Agency requirement To report to CIO—
(1)
added In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), each covered agency each year shall submit to the Federal Chief Information Officer a report on the implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative, including savings resulting from such implementation. The report shall include an update of the agency’s plan for implementing the Initiative.
(2)
added Department of Defense— The Secretary of Defense shall comply with paragraph (1) each year by submitting to the Federal Chief Information Officer a report with relevant information collected under section 2867 of Public Law 112–81 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note) or a copy of the report required under section 2867(d) of such law.
(b)
added Federal chief information officer requirement To report to congress— Each year, the Federal Chief Information Officer shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report that assesses agency progress in carrying out the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative and updates the plan under section 5203. The report may be included as part of the annual report required under section 3606 of title 44, United States Code.

Sec. 5301 Inventory of information technology software assets

added
(a)
added Plan— The Director shall develop a plan for conducting a Governmentwide inventory of information technology software assets.
(b)
added Matters covered— The plan required by subsection (a) shall cover the following:
(1)
added The manner in which Federal agencies can achieve the greatest possible economies of scale and cost savings in the procurement of information technology software assets, through measures such as reducing the procurement of new software licenses until such time as agency needs exceed the number of existing and unused licenses.
(2)
added The capability to conduct ongoing Governmentwide inventories of all existing software licenses on an application-by-application basis, including duplicative, unused, overused, and underused licenses, and to assess the need of agencies for software licenses.
(3)
added A Governmentwide spending analysis to provide knowledge about how much is being spent for software products or services to support decisions for strategic sourcing under the Federal strategic sourcing program managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
(c)
added Availability— The inventory of information technology software assets shall be available to Chief Information Officers and such other Federal officials as the Chief Information Officers may, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, designate.
(d)
added Deadline and submission to congress— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall complete and submit to Congress the plan required by subsection (a).
(e)
added Implementation— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall complete implementation of the plan required by subsection (a).
(f)
added Review by comptroller general— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the plan required by subsection (a) and submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the review.

Sec. 5302 Website consolidation and transparency

added
(a)
added Website consolidation— The Director shall—
(1)
added in consultation with Federal agencies, and after reviewing the directory of public Federal Government websites of each agency (as required to be established and updated under section 207(f)(3) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–347; 44 U.S.C. 3501 note)), assess all the publicly available websites of Federal agencies to determine whether there are duplicative or overlapping websites; and
(2)
added require Federal agencies to eliminate or consolidate those websites that are duplicative or overlapping.
(b)
added Website transparency— The Director shall issue guidance to Federal agencies to ensure that the data on publicly available websites of the agencies are open and accessible to the public.
(c)
added Matters covered— In preparing the guidance required by subsection (b), the Director shall—
(1)
added develop guidelines, standards, and best practices for interoperability and transparency;
(2)
added identify interfaces that provide for shared, open solutions on the publicly available websites of the agencies; and
(3)
added ensure that Federal agency Internet home pages, web-based forms, and web-based applications are accessible to individuals with disabilities in conformance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d).
(d)
added Deadline for guidance— The guidance required by subsection (b) shall be issued not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 5303 Transition to the cloud

added
(a)
added Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that transition to cloud computing offers significant potential benefits for the implementation of Federal information technology projects in terms of flexibility, cost, and operational benefits.
(b)
added Governmentwide application— In assessing cloud computing opportunities, the Chief Information Officers Council shall define policies and guidelines for the adoption of Governmentwide programs providing for a standardized approach to security assessment and operational authorization for cloud products and services.
(c)
added Additional budget authorities for transition— In transitioning to the cloud, a Chief Information Officer of an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code, may establish such cloud service Working Capital Funds, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the agency, as may be necessary to transition to cloud-based solutions. Any establishment of a new Working Capital Fund under this subsection shall be reported to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate and relevant Congressional committees.

Sec. 5304 Elimination of unnecessary duplication of contracts by requiring business case analysis

added
(a)
added Purpose— The purpose of this section is to leverage the Government’s buying power and achieve administrative efficiencies and cost savings by eliminating unnecessary duplication of contracts.
(b)
added Requirement for business case approval—
(1)
added In general— Chapter 33 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

added “3312. Requirement for business case approval for new Governmentwide contracts

added “(a) In general—An executive agency may not issue a solicitation for a covered Governmentwide contract unless the agency performs a business case analysis for the contract and obtains an approval of the business case analysis from the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy.

added “(b) Review of business case analysis

added “(1) In general—With respect to any covered Governmentwide contract, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall review the business case analysis submitted for the contract and provide an approval or disapproval within 60 days after the date of submission. Any business case analysis not disapproved within such 60-day period is deemed to be approved.

added “(2) Basis for approval of business case—The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall approve or disapprove a business case analysis based on the adequacy of the analysis submitted. The Administrator shall give primary consideration to whether an agency has demonstrated a compelling need that cannot be satisfied by existing Governmentwide contract in a timely and cost-effective manner.

added “(c) Content of business case analysis—The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall issue guidance specifying the content for a business case analysis submitted pursuant to this section. At a minimum, the business case analysis shall include details on the administrative resources needed for such contract, including an analysis of all direct and indirect costs to the Federal Government of awarding and administering such contract and the impact such contract will have on the ability of the Federal Government to leverage its purchasing power.

added “(b) Definitions—In this section:

added “(1) Covered Governmentwide contract—The term “covered Governmentwide contract” means any contract, blanket purchase agreement, or other contractual instrument for acquisition of information technology or other goods or services that allows for an indefinite number of orders to be placed under the contract, agreement, or instrument, and that is established by one executive agency for use by multiple executive agencies to obtain goods or services. The term does not include—

added “(A) a multiple award schedule contract awarded by the General Services Administration;

added “(B) a Governmentwide acquisition contract for information technology awarded pursuant to sections 11302(e) and 11314(a)(2) of title 40;

added “(C) orders under Governmentwide contracts in existence before the effective date of this section; or

added “(D) any contract in an amount less than $10,000,000, determined on an average annual basis.

added “(2) Executive agency—The term “executive agency” has the meaning provided that term by section 105 of title 5.”

(2)
added Clerical amendment— The table of sections for chapter 33 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to section 3311 the following new item:
(c)
added Report— Not later than June 1 in each of the next 6 years following the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the implementation of section 3312 of title 41, United States Code, as added by subsection (b), including a summary of the submissions, reviews, approvals, and disapprovals of business case analyses pursuant to such section.
(d)
added Guidance— The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall issue guidance for implementing section 3312 of such title.
(e)
added Revision of FAR— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be amended to implement section 3312 of such title.
(g)
added Effective date— Section 3312 of such title is effective on and after 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 5411 Expansion of training and use of information technology acquisition cadres

added
(a)
added Purpose— The purpose of this section is to ensure timely progress by Federal agencies toward developing, strengthening, and deploying personnel with highly specialized skills in information technology acquisition, including program and project managers, to be known as information technology acquisition cadres.
(b)
added Report to congress— Section 1704 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

added “(j) Strategic plan on information technology acquisition cadres

added “(1) Five-year strategic plan to congress—Not later than June 1 following the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a 5-year strategic plan (to be known as the “IT Acquisition Cadres Strategic Plan”) to develop, strengthen, and solidify information technology acquisition cadres. The plan shall include a timeline for implementation of the plan and identification of individuals responsible for specific elements of the plan during the 5-year period covered by the plan.

added “(2) Matters covered—The plan shall address, at a minimum, the following matters:

added “(A) Current information technology acquisition staffing challenges in Federal agencies, by previous year’s information technology acquisition value, and by the Federal Government as a whole.

added “(B) The variety and complexity of information technology acquisitions conducted by each Federal agency covered by the plan, and the specialized information technology acquisition workforce needed to effectively carry out such acquisitions.

added “(C) The development of a sustainable funding model to support efforts to hire, retain, and train an information technology acquisition cadre of appropriate size and skill to effectively carry out the acquisition programs of the Federal agencies covered by the plan, including an examination of interagency funding methods and a discussion of how the model of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund could be applied to civilian agencies.

added “(D) Any strategic human capital planning necessary to hire, retain, and train an information acquisition cadre of appropriate size and skill at each Federal agency covered by the plan.

added “(E) Governmentwide training standards and certification requirements necessary to enhance the mobility and career opportunities of the Federal information technology acquisition cadre within the Federal agencies covered by the plan.

added “(F) New and innovative approaches to workforce development and training, including cross-functional training, rotational development, and assignments both within and outside the Government.

added “(G) Appropriate consideration and alignment with the needs and priorities of the acquisition intern programs.

added “(H) Assessment of the current workforce competency and usage trends in evaluation technique to obtain best value, including proper handling of tradeoffs between price and nonprice factors.

added “(I) Assessment of the current workforce competency in designing and aligning performance goals, life cycle costs, and contract incentives.

added “(J) Assessment of the current workforce competency in avoiding brand-name preference and using industry-neutral functional specifications to leverage open industry standards and competition.

added “(K) Use of integrated program teams, including fully dedicated program managers, for each complex information technology investment.

added “(L) Proper assignment of recognition or accountability to the members of an integrated program team for both individual functional goals and overall program success or failure.

added “(M) The development of a technology fellows program that includes provisions for recruiting, for rotation of assignments, and for partnering directly with universities with well-recognized information technology programs.

added “(N) The capability to properly manage other transaction authority (where such authority is granted), including ensuring that the use of the authority is warranted due to unique technical challenges, rapid adoption of innovative or emerging commercial or noncommercial technologies, or other circumstances that cannot readily be satisfied using a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement in accordance with applicable law and the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

added “(O) The use of student internship and scholarship programs as a talent pool for permanent hires and the use and impact of special hiring authorities and flexibilities to recruit diverse candidates.

added “(P) The assessment of hiring manager satisfaction with the hiring process and hiring outcomes, including satisfaction with the quality of applicants interviewed and hires made.

added “(Q) The assessment of applicant satisfaction with the hiring process, including the clarity of the hiring announcement, the user-friendliness of the application process, communication from the hiring manager or agency regarding application status, and timeliness of the hiring decision.

added “(R) The assessment of new hire satisfaction with the onboarding process, including the orientation process, and investment in training and development for employees during their first year of employment.

added “(S) Any other matters the Director considers appropriate.

added “(3) Annual report—Not later than June 1 in each of the 5 years following the year of submission of the plan required by paragraph (1), the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees an annual report outlining the progress made pursuant to the plan.

added “(4) Government accountability office review of the plan and annual report

added “(A) Not later than 1 year after the submission of the plan required by paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the plan and submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the review.

added “(B) Not later than 6 months after the submission of the first, third, and fifth annual report required under paragraph (3), the Comptroller General shall independently assess the findings of the annual report and brief the relevant congressional committees on the Comptroller General’s findings and recommendations to ensure the objectives of the plan are accomplished.

added “(5) Definitions—In this subsection:

added “(A) The term “Federal agency” means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31.

added “(B) The term “relevant congressional committees” means each of the following:

added “(i) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

added “(ii) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.”

Sec. 5412 Plan on strengthening program and project management performance

added
(a)
added Plan on strengthening program and project management performance— Not later than June 1 following the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a plan for improving management of IT programs and projects.
(b)
added Matters covered— The plan required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added Creation of a specialized career path for program management.
(2)
added The development of a competency model for program management consistent with the IT project manager model.
(3)
added A career advancement model that requires appropriate expertise and experience for advancement.
(4)
added A career advancement model that is more competitive with the private sector and that recognizes both Government and private sector experience.
(c)
added Combination with other cadres plan— The Director may combine the plan required by subsection (a) with the IT Acquisition Cadres Strategic Plan required under section 1704(j) of title 41, United States Code, as added by section 5411.

Sec. 5413 Personnel awards for excellence in the acquisition of information systems and information technology

added
(a)
added In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall develop policy and guidance for agencies to develop a program to recognize excellent performance by Federal Government employees and teams of such employees in the acquisition of information systems and information technology for the agency.
(b)
added Elements— The program referred to in subsection (a) shall, to the extent practicable—
(1)
added obtain objective outcome measures; and
(2)
added include procedures for—
(A)
added the nomination of Federal Government employees and teams of such employees for eligibility for recognition under the program; and
(B)
added the evaluation of nominations for recognition under the program by 1 or more agency panels of individuals from Government, academia, and the private sector who have such expertise, and are appointed in such a manner, as the Director of the Office of Personal Management shall establish for purposes of the program.
(c)
added Award of cash bonuses and other incentives— In carrying out the program referred to in subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall establish policies and guidance for agencies to reward any Federal Government employee or teams of such employees recognized pursuant to the program—
(1)
added with a cash bonus, to the extent that the performance of such individual or team warrants the award of such bonus and is authorized by any provision of law;
(2)
added through promotions and other nonmonetary awards;
(3)
added by publicizing—
(A)
added acquisition accomplishments by individual employees; and
(B)
added the tangible end benefits that resulted from such accomplishments, as appropriate; and
(4)
added through other awards, incentives, or bonuses that the head of the agency considers appropriate.

Sec. 5501 Maximizing the benefit of the Federal strategic sourcing initiative

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall prescribe regulations providing that when the Federal Government makes a purchase of services and supplies offered under the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy) but such Initiative is not used, the contract file for the purchase shall include a brief analysis of the comparative value, including price and nonprice factors, between the services and supplies offered under such Initiative and services and supplies offered under the source or sources used for the purchase.

Sec. 5502 Governmentwide software purchasing program

added
(a)
added In general— The Administrator of General Services, in collaboration with the Department of Defense, shall identify and develop a strategic sourcing initiative to enhance Governmentwide acquisition, shared use, and dissemination of software, as well as compliance with end user license agreements.
(b)
added Examination of methods— In developing the initiative under subsection (a), the Administrator shall examine the use of realistic and effective demand aggregation models supported by actual agency commitment to use the models, and supplier relationship management practices, to more effectively govern the Government’s acquisition of information technology.
(c)
added Governmentwide user license agreement— The Administrator, in developing the initiative under subsection (a), shall allow for the purchase of a license agreement that is available for use by all executive agencies as one user to the maximum extent practicable and as appropriate.

Sec. 5503 Promoting transparency of blanket purchase agreements

added
(a)
added Price information To be treated as public information— The final negotiated price offered by an awardee of a blanket purchase agreement shall be treated as public information.
(b)
added Publication of blanket purchase agreement information— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall make available to the public a list of all blanket purchase agreements entered into by Federal agencies under its Federal Supply Schedules contracts and the prices associated with those blanket purchase agreements. The list and price information shall be updated at least once every 6 months.

Sec. 5504 Additional source selection technique in solicitations

added

added Section 3306(d) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—

(1)
added by striking “or” at the end of paragraph (1);
(2)
added by striking the period and inserting “; or” at the end of paragraph (2); and
(3)
added by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

added “(3) stating in the solicitation that the award will be made using a fixed price technical competition, under which all offerors compete solely on nonprice factors and the fixed award price is pre-announced in the solicitation.”

Sec. 5505 Enhanced transparency in information technology investments

added
(a)
added Public availability of information about IT investments— Section 11302(c) of title 40, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
added by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
(2)
added by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:

added “(2) Public availability

added “(A) In general—The Director shall make available to the public the cost, schedule, and performance data for all of the IT investments listed in subparagraph (B), notwithstanding whether the investments are for new IT acquisitions or for operations and maintenance of existing IT.

added “(B) Investments listed—The investments listed in this subparagraph are the following:

added “(i) At least 80 percent (by dollar value) of all information technology investments Governmentwide.

added “(ii) At least 60 percent (by dollar value) of all information technology investments in each Federal agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31.

added “(iii) Every major information technology investment (as defined by the Office of Management and Budget) in each Federal agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31.

added “(C) Quarterly review and certification—For each investment listed in subparagraph (B), the agency Chief Information Officer and the program manager of the investment within the agency shall certify, at least once every quarter, that the information is current, accurate, and reflects the risks associated with each listed investment. The Director shall conduct quarterly reviews and publicly identify agencies with an incomplete certification or with significant data quality issues.

added “(D) Continuous availability—The information required under subparagraph (A), in its most updated form, shall be publicly available at all times.

added “(E) Waiver or limitation authority—The applicability of subparagraph (A) may be waived or the extent of the information may be limited—

added “(i) by the Director, with respect to IT investments Governmentwide; and

added “(ii) by the Chief Information Officer of a Federal agency, with respect to IT investments in that agency;”

(b)
added Additional report requirements— Paragraph (3) of section 11302(c) of such title, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following: “The report shall include an analysis of agency trends reflected in the performance risk information required in paragraph (2).”.

Sec. 5506 Enhanced communication between government and industry

added

added Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall prescribe a regulation making clear that agency acquisition personnel are permitted and encouraged to engage in responsible and constructive exchanges with industry, so long as those exchanges are consistent with existing law and regulation and do not promote an unfair competitive advantage to particular firms.

Sec. 5507 Clarification of current law with respect to technology neutrality in acquisition of software

added
(a)
added Purpose— The purpose of this section is to establish guidance and processes to clarify that software acquisitions by the Federal Government are to be made using merit-based requirements development and evaluation processes that promote procurement choices—
(1)
added based on performance and value, including the long-term value proposition to the Federal Government;
(2)
added free of preconceived preferences based on how technology is developed, licensed, or distributed; and
(3)
added generally including the consideration of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software technologies.
(b)
added Technology neutrality— Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the Federal Government’s long-standing policy of following technology-neutral principles and practices when selecting and acquiring information technology that best fits the needs of the Federal Government.
(c)
added Guidance— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, shall issue guidance concerning the technology-neutral procurement and use of software within the Federal Government.
(d)
added Matters covered— In issuing guidance under subsection (c), the Director shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
added Guidance to clarify that the preference for commercial items in section 3307 of title 41, United States Code, includes proprietary, open source, and mixed source software that meets the definition of the term “commercial item” in section 103 of title 41, United States Code, including all such software that is used for non-Government purposes and is licensed to the public.
(2)
added Guidance regarding the conduct of market research to ensure the inclusion of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software options.
(3)
added Guidance to define Governmentwide standards for security, redistribution, indemnity, and copyright in the acquisition, use, release, and collaborative development of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software.
(4)
added Guidance for the adoption of available commercial practices to acquire proprietary, open source, and mixed source software for widespread Government use, including issues such as security and redistribution rights.
(5)
added Guidance to establish standard service level agreements for maintenance and support for proprietary, open source, and mixed source software products widely adopted by the Government, as well as the development of Governmentwide agreements that contain standard and widely applicable contract provisions for ongoing maintenance and development of software.
(e)
added Report to congress— Not later than 2 years after the issuance of the guidance required by subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report containing—
(1)
added an assessment of the effectiveness of the guidance;
(2)
added an identification of barriers to widespread use by the Federal Government of specific software technologies; and
(3)
added such legislative recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to further the purposes of this section.

Sec. 5508 No additional funds authorized

added

added No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of this division and the amendments made by this division. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated.