Accountability Review Board Reform Act of 2013
A BILL
To amend the Diplomatic Security Act to require certain notifications to Congress of Accountability Review Boards of the Department of State, avoid conflicts of interest of the members of such Boards, require actions with respect to reports from such Boards, and for other purposes.
2. Findings; Sense of Congress
3. Notification to Congress about certain information relating to accountability review boards of the Department of State
“(3) of any individual who is employed at a grade of not lower than the level of FS-3 or GS-14 who is hired, assigned, or detailed to assist the Board to carry out its duties;
“(4) of any political appointee who is hired, assigned, or detailed to assist the Board to carry out its duties; and”
4. Accountability review boards
“(2) Staff
“(A) In general—A Board may hire staff to assist the Board, and may have any Federal Government employee assigned or detailed to such Board, with or without reimbursement, to assist such Board. Any such assignee or detailee shall retain without interruption the rights, status, and privileges of his or her regular employment.
“(B) Special rule—Any individual who is hired, assigned, or detailed to assist a Board under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to the rule relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interest under subsection (a) in the same manner and to the same extent as a Member of such a Board is subject to such avoidance under such subsection.
“(C) Office of the Inspector General—To the maximum extent practicable, individuals assisting the Board shall be employees of the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of State.”
“(c) Avoidance of conflicts of interest
“(1) In general—The Secretary of State, the CIGIE Chairperson, and the Director of National Intelligence may not appoint any individual as a member of a Board if the Secretary, the CIGIE Chairperson, or the Director, as the case may be, determines that such individual has a conflict of interest concerning a person whose performance such Board reasonably could be expected to review.
“(2) Declining appointment—An individual shall decline appointment to membership on a Board if such individual has actual knowledge of a conflict of interest concerning a person whose performance such Board could reasonably be expected to review.
“(3) Recusal from particular activities—A member of a Board shall recuse him or herself from any Board activity, interview, deposition, or recommendation concerning a person with whom such member has a conflict of interest. Such member shall promptly notify the other members of such Board of any such recusal, but need not state the basis therefor.
“(d) Conflict of interest defined—In this section, the term “conflict of interest” means one of the following relationships, whether current or former, that would cause a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts to question the impartiality of the parties to such relationship toward each other:
“(1) A business, contractual, or other financial relationship that involves other than a routine consumer transaction.
“(2) A familial, member of household, or other close personal relationship, including a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature.
“(3) A direct managerial or supervisory workplace relationship.”
5. Evidence
“(4) Determination of relevancy—The Board may accept any evidence determined by a member of the Board to be relevant and material to an investigation or inquiry of the Board. The Federal Rules of Evidence are not applicable to the Board.”
6. Board actions
“(b) Program recommendations
“(1) In general—Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 90 days after a Board is convened in a case, such Board shall submit to the Secretary of State and Congress its findings (which may be classified to the extent determined necessary by the Board), together with recommendations as appropriate to improve the security and efficiency of any program or operation which such Board has reviewed.
“(2) Extension—The 90 day period referred to in paragraph (1) may be extended for up to 60 days if the Chairperson of the Board referred to in such paragraph determines that such additional time is necessary to complete a thorough review of the program or operation at issue.
“(3) Dissenting views—If a member dissents from any of the findings or recommendations of the Board, such member may submit dissenting views to accompany the submission of the Board’s findings and recommendations under paragraph (1).”
“(1) Program recommendations—Not later than 90 days after the submission to the Secretary of State of the findings and recommendations from any Board in accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a corresponding report on the action taken with respect to each such recommendation.”