Sec. 3
Strategy to achieve situational awareness and operational control of the border
(a)
changed
Strategy To to secure the border— Not later than 120 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy for gaining and maintaining situational awareness, and operational control of high traffic areas of the international borders of the United States areas, by the date that is not later than two years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (b). The strategy shall include, at a minimum, a consideration (c), and operational control along the southwest border of the following:United States by the date that is not later than five years after such date of submission.
(b)
added
Contents of strategy— The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, a consideration of the following:
(1)
added
An assessment of principal border security threats, including threats relating to the smuggling and trafficking of humans, weapons, and illicit drugs.
(2)
added
Efforts to analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information between Department of Homeland Security border security components and with other appropriate Federal departments and agencies with missions associated with the border.
(3)
added
Efforts to increase situational awareness, in accordance with privacy, civil liberties, and civil rights protections, including—
(A)
added
surveillance capabilities developed or utilized by the Department of Defense, including any technology determined to be excess by the Department of Defense; and
(B)
added
use of manned aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, including camera and sensor technology deployed on such assets.
(4)
added
Efforts to detect and prevent terrorists and instruments of terrorism from entering the United States.
(5)
added
Efforts to ensure that any new border security technology can be operationally integrated with existing technologies in use by the Department of Homeland Security.
(6)
added
An assessment of existing efforts and technologies used for border security and the effect of the use of such efforts and technologies on civil rights, private property rights, privacy rights, and civil liberties.
(7)
added
Technology required to maintain, support, and enhance security and facilitate trade at ports of entry, including nonintrusive detection equipment, radiation detection equipment, biometric technology, surveillance systems, and other sensors and technology that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines necessary.
(1)
removed
An assessment of principal border security threats.
(2)
removed
Efforts to analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information between Department of Homeland Security border security components.
(3)
removed
Efforts to increase situational awareness.
(4)
removed
A comprehensive border security technology plan for detection technology capabilities, including a documented justification and rationale for technology choices, deployment locations, fixed versus mobile assets, and a timetable for procurement and deployment.
(5)
removed
Surveillance capabilities developed or utilized by the Department of Defense, including any technology determined to be excess by the Department of Defense.
(6)
removed
Use of manned aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, including the camera and sensor technology deployed on such assets.
(7)
removed
Technology required to enhance security at ports of entry, including the installation of nonintrusive detection equipment, radiation portal monitors, biometric technology, and other sensors and technology that the Secretary determines necessary.
(8)
renumbered
was (2)(10)
Operational coordination of Department of Homeland Security border security components.
(9)
added
Lessons learned from Operation Jumpstart and Operation Phalanx.
(10)
added
Cooperative agreements and information sharing with State, local, tribal, territorial, and other Federal law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern or southern borders, or in the maritime environment.
(11)
added
Border security information received from consultation with State, local, tribal, and Federal law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern or southern border, or in the maritime environment, and from border community stakeholders (including through public meetings with such stakeholders), including representatives from border agricultural and ranching organizations and representatives from business and civic organizations along the northern or southern border.
(12)
added
Agreements with foreign governments that support the border security efforts of the United States, including coordinated installation of standardized land border inspection technology, such as license plate readers and RFID readers.
(9)
removed
Cooperative agreements with State, local, tribal, and other Federal law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern border, southern border, and in the maritime environment.
(10)
removed
Agreements with foreign governments that support the border security efforts of the United States.
(13)
renumbered
was (2)(13)
Staffing requirements for all border security functions.
(14)
added
A prioritized list of research and development objectives to enhance the security of the international land and maritime borders of the United States.
(15)
added
An assessment of training programs, including training programs regarding—
(A)
added
identifying and detecting fraudulent documents;
(B)
added
protecting the civil, constitutional, human, and privacy rights of individuals;
(C)
added
understanding the scope of enforcement authorities and the use of force policies;
(D)
added
screening, identifying, and addressing vulnerable populations, such as children and victims of human trafficking; and
(E)
added
social and cultural sensitivity toward border communities.
(16)
added
Local crime indices of municipalities and counties along the Southern border.
(17)
added
An assessment of how border security operations affect crossing times.
(18)
renumbered
was (2)(14)
Metrics required under subsections (e), (f), and (g).
(c)
added
Implementation plan—
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 90 days after the submission of the strategy required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Government Accountability Office an implementation plan for each of the Department of Homeland Security border security components to carry out such strategy. Such implementation plan shall, at a minimum—
(A)
added
specify what protections will be put in place to ensure that staffing and resources necessary for the maintenance of operations at ports of entry are not diverted to the detriment of such operations in favor of operations between ports of entry; and
(i)
added
an integrated master schedule and cost estimate, including lifecycle costs, for the activities contained in such implementation plan; and
(ii)
added
a comprehensive border security technology plan to improve surveillance capabilities that includes—
(I)
added
a documented justification and rationale for technology choices;
(II)
added
deployment locations;
(III)
added
fixed versus mobile assets;
(IV)
added
a timetable for procurement and deployment;
(V)
added
estimates of operation and maintenance costs;
(VI)
added
an identification of any impediments to the deployment of such technologies; and
(VII)
added
estimates of the relative cost effectiveness of various border security strategies and operations, including deployment of personnel and technology, and construction of new physical and virtual barriers.
(2)
added
Government Accountability Office review— Not later than 90 days after receiving the implementation plan in accordance with paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such plan.
(b)
removed
Implementation plan—
(1)
removed
In general— Not later than 60 days after the submission of the strategy under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an implementation plan for each of the Department of Homeland Security border security components to carry out such strategy.
(2)
removed
Government Accountability Office review—
(A)
removed
In general— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall make available to the Government Accountability Office the implementation plan required under paragraph (1).
(B)
removed
Report— Not later than 90 days after receiving the implementation plan in accordance with subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such plan.
(c)
removed
Situational awareness— Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall achieve situational awareness of the international borders of the United States.
(d)
changed
Periodic updates— Not later than 180 days after the submission of each Quadrennial Homeland Security Review required under section 707 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 347) beginning with the first such Review that is due after the implementation plan is submitted under subsection (b), (c), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an updated—
(1)
strategy under subsection (a); and
(2)
changed
implementation plan under subsection (b).(c).
(e)
changed
Metrics for securing the border between ports of entry— Not later than 90 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security between ports of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
changed
An effectiveness rate which measures the number of illegal border crossers who are turned back, and the amount of narcotics seized, against the total estimated number of illegal border crossers and amount of narcotics the Department of Homeland Security’s border security components fail to apprehend or seize, as the case may be.crossing effectiveness rate, informed by situational awareness.
(2)
changed
Estimates, using alternate methodologies, including recidivism An illicit drugs seizure rate which measures the amount and survey data, type of total attempted illegal border crossings, illicit drugs seized by the rate of apprehension Border Patrol in any fiscal year compared to an average of attempted illegal border crossings, the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the inflow into Border Patrol for the United States of illegal border crossers who evade apprehension.immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(3)
changed
Estimates of A cocaine seizure effectiveness rate measured as a percentage that results from dividing the impacts amount of cocaine seized by the Border Patrol’s Consequence Delivery System on Patrol by the total documented cocaine flow rate of recidivism of illegal border crossers.as contained in Federal drug databases.
(4)
changed
An understanding Estimates, using alternative methodologies, including recidivism data, survey data, known-flow data, and technologically-measured data, of total attempted illegal border crossings, total deaths and injuries resulting from such attempted illegal border crossings, the current level rate of situational awareness.apprehension of attempted illegal border crossers, and the inflow into the United States of illegal border crossers who evade apprehension.
(5)
changed
Amount Estimates of narcotics seized between ports the impact of entry.the Border Patrol’s Consequence Delivery System on the rate of recidivism of illegal border crossers.
(f)
added
Metrics for securing the border at ports of entry—
(1)
added
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security at ports of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
added
An inadmissible border crossing rate which measures the number of known inadmissible border crossers who are apprehended, excluding those border crossers who voluntarily withdraw their applications for admission, against the total estimated number of inadmissible border crossers U.S. Customs and Border Protection fails to apprehend.
(B)
added
An illicit drugs seizure rate which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(C)
added
A cocaine seizure effectiveness rate measured as a percentage that results from dividing the amount of cocaine seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection by the total documented cocaine flow rate as contained in Federal drug databases.
(D)
added
Estimates, using alternative methodologies, including survey data and randomized secondary screening data, of total attempted inadmissible border crossers, the rate of apprehension of attempted inadmissible border crossers, and the inflow into the United States of inadmissible border crossers who evade apprehension.
(E)
added
The number of infractions related to personnel and cargo committed by major violators who are apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at ports of entry, and the estimated number of such infractions committed by major violators who are not so apprehended.
(F)
added
A measurement of how border security operations affect crossing times.
(f)
removed
Metrics for securing the border at ports of entry— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics to measure the effectiveness of security at ports of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(2)
changed
Covert testing— An effectiveness rate which measures the number The Inspector General of illegal border crossers who are turned back, and the amount Department of narcotics seized, against the total estimated number Homeland Security shall carry out covert testing at ports of illegal border crossers entry and amount of narcotics submit to the Department Secretary of Homeland Security’s border security components fail to apprehend or seize, as Security and the case may be.appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the results of such testing. The Secretary shall use such results to inform activities under this subsection.
(2)
removed
The number of infractions related to personnel and cargo committed by major violators who are apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at such ports of entry.
(3)
removed
The estimated number of such infractions committed by major violators who are not so apprehended.
(4)
removed
Estimates, using alternate methodologies, including recidivism and survey data, of total attempted illegal border crossings, the rate of apprehension of attempted illegal border crossings, and the inflow into the United States of illegal border crossers who evade apprehension.
(g)
changed
Metrics for securing the maritime border— Not later than 90 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security in the maritime environment, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
changed
An effectiveness rate which measures the number of migrants apprehended, the number of migrants turned back, and the amount estimate of narcotics seized, against the total estimated numbers number of undocumented migrants and amount of narcotics the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to apprehend or seize, as the case may be.interdict.
(2)
changed
An understanding undocumented migrant interdiction rate which measures the number of undocumented migrants interdicted against the current level total estimated number of situational awareness.undocumented migrants the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to interdict.
(3)
changed
A response An illicit drugs removal rate which measures the Department’s ability to respond to known maritime threats amount and type of illicit drugs removed by placing assets on-scene, the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components inside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the total number amount and type of events with respect to which illicit drugs removed by the Department has known threat information.of Homeland Security’s maritime security components inside a transit zone for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(4)
changed
Partnerships with international, State, local, tribal, and other Federal law enforcement agencies.An illicit drugs removal rate which measures the amount of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components outside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount of illicit drugs removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components outside a transit zone for the immediately preceding five fiscal years.
(5)
added
A cocaine removal effectiveness rate inside a transit zone.
(6)
added
A cocaine removal effectiveness rate outside a transit zone.
(7)
added
A response rate which measures the Department of Homeland Security’s ability to respond to and resolve known maritime threats, both inside and outside a transit zone, by placing assets on-scene, compared to the total number of events with respect to which the Department has known threat information.
(h)
changed
Independent assessment by a National Laboratory within the Department of Homeland Security Laboratory Network—Collaboration— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall request collaborate with the head of a national laboratory within the Department of Homeland Security laboratory network with prior expertise in border security to—and the head of a border security university-based center within the Department of Homeland Security centers of excellence network to develop the metrics required under subsections (e), (f), and (g) to ensure the suitability and statistical validity of each such metric. Such collaboration shall also include consultation by the Secretary with the Governors of every border State and representatives of the Border Patrol and U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
(i)
added
Recommendations relating to certain other metrics— In carrying out subsection (h), the head of the national laboratory and the head of a border security university-based center referred to in such subsection shall make recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security for other suitable metrics that may be used to measure the effectiveness of border security.
(1)
removed
provide an independent assessment of the metrics implemented in accordance with subsections (e), (f), and (g) to ensure each such metric’s suitability and statistical validity; and
(2)
removed
make recommendations for other suitable metrics that may be used to measure the effectiveness of border security.
(i)
removed
Evaluation by the Government Accountability Office—
(1)
removed
In general— The Secretary of Homeland Security shall make available to the Government Accountability Office the data and methodology used to develop the metrics implemented under subsections (e), (f), and (g) and the independent assessment described under subsection (h).
(2)
removed
Report— Not later than 270 days after receiving the data and methodology described in paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the suitability and statistical validity of such data and methodology.
(j)
changed
Certifications relating to operational control—Evaluation by the Government Accountability Office—
(1)
changed
By the Secretary of Homeland Security—In general— If the The Secretary of Homeland Security determines that operational control of the international borders of the United States has been achieved, the Secretary shall submit make available to the appropriate congressional committees and Government Accountability Office the Comptroller General of data and methodology used to develop the United States a certification that so attests.metrics implemented under subsections (e), (f), and (g).
(2)
added
Report— Not later than 270 days after receiving the data and methodology referred to in paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the suitability and statistical validity of such data and methodology.
(k)
added
Certifications and reports relating to operational control—
(1)
added
By the Secretary of Homeland Security—
(A)
added
Two years— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas have been achieved by the date that is not later than two years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States a certification that so attests.
(B)
added
Five years— If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that operational control along the southwest border of the United States has been achieved by the date that is not later than five years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States a certification that so attests.
(C)
added
Annual updates— Every year beginning with the year after the Secretary of Homeland Security submits the certification under subparagraph (B), if the Secretary determines that operational control along the southwest border of the United States is being maintained, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States a certification that so attests.
(2)
added
By the Comptroller General—
(A)
added
Reviews— The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the certifications of the Secretary of Homeland Security under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) to assess the certifications of the Secretary relating to the achievement of situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, in accordance with such subparagraphs.
(B)
added
Reports— Not later than 120 days after conducting the reviews described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of each such review.
(2)
removed
By the Comptroller General—
(A)
removed
Review— The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the certification of the Secretary of Homeland Security under paragraph (1) to verify if such certification is accurate.
(B)
removed
Verification and submission— If the Comptroller General of the United States verifies the accuracy of the certification of the Secretary of Homeland Security under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall, not later than 120 days after such verification, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that so attests.
(k)
removed
Government Accountability Office report on border security duplication— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report addressing areas of overlap in responsibilities within the border security functions of the Department of Homeland Security.
(l)
changed
Reports—Failure to achieve situational awareness or operational control— Not later than 60 days after If the date Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the enactment of this Act case may be, has not been achieved by the dates referred to in subparagraphs (A) and annually thereafter, (B) of subsection (k)(1), as the case may be, or if the Secretary determines that operational control is not being annually maintained pursuant to subparagraph (C) of Homeland Security shall such subsection, the Secretary shall, not later than 60 days after such dates, submit to the appropriate congressional committee committees a report on that describes why situational awareness or operational control, or both, as the following:case may be, was not achieved. Such report shall include, at a minimum, impediments incurred, potential remedies, and recommendations to achieve situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be.
(m)
added
Government Accountability Office report on border security duplication and cost effectiveness— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report addressing areas of overlap in responsibilities within the border security functions of the Department of Homeland Security and the relative cost effectiveness of border security strategies, including deployment of additional personnel and technology, and construction of virtual and physical barriers.
(n)
added
Reports— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the following:
(1)
added
A resource allocation model for current and future year staffing requirements that includes optimal staffing levels at all land, air, and sea ports of entry, and an explanation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection methodology for aligning staffing levels and workload to threats and vulnerabilities and their effects on cross border trade and passenger travel across all mission areas.
(2)
added
Detailed information on the level of manpower available at all land, air, and sea ports of entry and between ports of entry, including the number of canine and agricultural specialists assigned to each such port of entry.
(1)
removed
A resource allocation model for current and future year staffing requirements that includes optimal staffing levels at all land, air, and sea ports of entry, and an explanation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection methodology for aligning staffing levels and workload to threats and vulnerabilities across all mission areas.
(2)
removed
Detailed information on the level of manpower available at all land, air, and sea ports of entry and between ports of entry, including the number of canine and agricultural officers assigned to each such port of entry.
(3)
renumbered
was (13)(5)
Detailed information that describes the difference between the staffing the model suggests and the actual staffing at each port of entry and between the ports of entry.
(4)
added
Detailed information that examines both the security impacts and competitive impacts of entering into a reimbursement agreement with foreign governments for U.S. Customs and Border Protection preclearance facilities.
(o)
renumbered
was (14)
Definitions— In this Act:
(1)
renumbered
was (14)(3)
Appropriate congressional committees— The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
(2)
added
Cocaine removal effectiveness rate— The term “cocaine removal effectiveness rate” means the percentage that results from dividing the amount of cocaine removed by the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components inside or outside a transit zone, as the case may be, by the total documented cocaine flow rate as contained in Federal drug databases.
(3)
added
Consequence Delivery System— The term “Consequence Delivery System” means the series of consequences applied to persons illegally entering the United States by the Border Patrol to prevent illegal border crossing recidivism.
(4)
added
Got away— The term “got away” means an illegal border crosser who, after making an illegal entry into the United States, is not turned back or apprehended.
(5)
added
High traffic areas— The term “high traffic areas” means sectors along the northern and southern borders of the United States that are within the responsibility of the Border Patrol that have the most illicit cross-border activity, informed through situational awareness.
(6)
added
Illegal border crossing effectiveness rate— The term “illegal border crossing effectiveness rate” means the percentage that results from dividing the number of apprehensions and turn backs by the number of apprehensions, turn backs, and got aways. The data used by the Secretary of Homeland Security to determine such rate shall be collected and reported in a consistent and standardized manner across all Border Patrol sectors.
(7)
added
Major violator— The term “major violator” means a person or entity that has engaged in serious criminal activities at any land, air, or sea port of entry, including possession of illicit drugs, smuggling of prohibited products, human smuggling, weapons possession, use of fraudulent United States documents, or other offenses serious enough to result in arrest.
(8)
added
Operational control— The term “operational control” means a condition in which there is a not lower than 90 percent illegal border crossing effectiveness rate, informed by situational awareness, and a significant reduction in the movement of illicit drugs and other contraband through such areas is being achieved.
(9)
added
Situational awareness— The term “situational awareness” means knowledge and an understanding of current illicit cross-border activity, including cross-border threats and trends concerning illicit trafficking and unlawful crossings along the international borders of the United States and in the maritime environment, and the ability to forecast future shifts in such threats and trends.
(10)
added
Transit zone— The term “transit zone” means the sea corridors of the western Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean Sea, and the eastern Pacific Ocean through which undocumented migrants and illicit drugs transit, either directly or indirectly, to the United States.
(11)
added
Turn back— The term “turn back” means an illegal border crosser who, after making an illegal entry into the United States, returns to the country from which such crosser entered.
(2)
removed
High traffic areas— The term “high traffic areas” means locations identified through situational awareness that are within close proximity of the northern and southern borders of the United States that have the most illicit cross-border activity.
(3)
removed
Major violator— The term “major violator” means a person or entity that has engaged in serious criminal activities at any land, air, or sea port of entry, including possession of narcotics, smuggling of prohibited products, human smuggling, weapons possession, use of fraudulent United States documents, or other offenses serious enough to result in arrest.
(4)
removed
Operational control— The term “operational control” means a condition in which there is a 90 percent probability that illegal border crossers are apprehended and narcotics and other contraband are seized in high traffic areas.
(5)
removed
Situational awareness— The term “situational awareness” means knowledge and an understanding of current illicit cross-border activity, including cross-border threats and trends concerning illicit trafficking and unlawful crossings along the international borders of the United States and in the maritime environment, and the ability to predict future shifts in such threats and trends.