(1)
In general— Chapter 4 of title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (
8 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 235A the following:
“235B. Humane and expedited inspection and screening for unaccompanied alien children
“(a) Asylum officer defined—In this section, the term asylum officer means an immigration officer who—
“(1) has had professional training in country conditions, asylum law, and interview techniques comparable to that provided to full-time adjudicators of applications under section 208; and
“(2) is supervised by an officer who—
“(A) meets the condition described in paragraph (1); and
“(B) has had substantial experience adjudicating asylum applications.
“(b) Proceeding
“(1) In general—Not later than 7 days after the screening of an unaccompanied alien child under section 235(a)(5) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232(a)(5)), an immigration judge shall conduct and conclude a proceeding to inspect, screen, and determine the status of the unaccompanied alien child who is an applicant for admission to the United States.
“(2) Time limit—Not later than 72 hours after the conclusion of a proceeding with respect to an unaccompanied alien child under this section, the immigration judge who conducted such proceeding shall issue an order pursuant to subsection (e).
“(c) Conduct of proceeding
“(1) Authority of immigration judge—The immigration judge conducting a proceeding under this section—
“(A) shall administer oaths, receive evidence, and interrogate, examine, and cross-examine the unaccompanied alien child and any witnesses;
“(B) may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and presentation of evidence;
“(C) is authorized to sanction by civil money penalty any action (or inaction) in contempt of the judge’s proper exercise of authority under this Act; and
“(D) shall determine whether the unaccompanied alien child meets any of the criteria set out in subparagraphs (A) through (G) of paragraph (3) of section 235(a) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232(a)), and if so, order the alien removed under subsection (e)(2) of this section.
“(2) Form of proceeding—A proceeding under this section may take place—
“(A) in person;
“(B) at a location agreed to by the parties, in the absence of the unaccompanied alien child;
“(C) through video conference; or
“(D) through telephone conference.
“(3) Presence of alien—If it is impracticable by reason of the mental incompetency of the unaccompanied alien child for the alien to be present at the proceeding, the Attorney General shall prescribe safeguards to protect the rights and privileges of the alien.
“(4) Rights of the alien—In a proceeding under this section—
“(A) the unaccompanied alien child shall be given the privilege of being represented, at no expense to the Government, by counsel of the alien’s choosing who is authorized to practice in the proceedings;
“(B) the alien shall be given a reasonable opportunity—
“(i) to examine the evidence against the alien;
“(ii) to present evidence on the alien’s own behalf; and
“(iii) to cross-examine witnesses presented by the Government;
“(C) the rights set forth in subparagraph (B) shall not entitle the alien—
“(i) to examine such national security information as the Government may proffer in opposition to the alien’s admission to the United States; or
“(ii) to an application by the alien for discretionary relief under this Act; and
“(D) a complete record shall be kept of all testimony and evidence produced at the proceeding.
“(5) Withdrawal of application for admission—An unaccompanied alien child applying for admission to the United States may, and at any time prior to the issuance of a final order of removal, be permitted to withdraw the application and immediately be returned to the alien’s country of nationality or country of last habitual residence.
“(6) Consequences of failure to appear—An unaccompanied alien child who does not attend a proceeding under this section, shall be ordered removed, except under exceptional circumstances where the alien’s absence is the fault of the Government, a medical emergency, or an act of nature.
“(d) Decision and burden of proof
“(1) Decision
“(A) In general—At the conclusion of a proceeding under this section, the immigration judge shall determine whether an unaccompanied alien child is likely to be—
“(i) admissible to the United States; or
“(ii) eligible for any form of relief from removal under this Act.
“(B) Evidence—The determination of the immigration judge under subparagraph (A) shall be based only on the evidence produced at the hearing.
“(2) Burden of proof
“(A) In general—In a proceeding under this section, an unaccompanied alien child who is an applicant for admission has the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the alien—
“(i) is likely to be entitled to be lawfully admitted to the United States or eligible for any form of relief from removal under this Act; or
“(ii) is lawfully present in the United States pursuant to a prior admission.
“(B) Access to documents—In meeting the burden of proof under subparagraph (A)(ii), the alien shall be given access to—
“(i) the alien’s visa or other entry document, if any; and
“(ii) any other records and documents, not considered by the Attorney General to be confidential, pertaining to the alien’s admission or presence in the United States.
“(e) Orders
“(1) Placement in further proceedings—If an immigration judge determines that the unaccompanied alien child has met the burden of proof under subsection (d)(2), the immigration judge shall—
“(A) order the alien to be placed in further proceedings in accordance with section 240; and
“(B) order the Secretary of Homeland Security to place the alien on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained docket for purposes of carrying out such proceedings.
“(2) Orders of removal—If an immigration judge determines that the unaccompanied alien child has not met the burden of proof required under subsection (d)(2), the judge shall order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review unless the alien claims—
“(A) an intention to apply for asylum under section 208; or
“(B) a fear of persecution.
“(3) Claims for asylum—If an unaccompanied alien child described in paragraph (2) claims an intention to apply for asylum under section 208 or a fear of persecution, the immigration judge shall order the alien referred for an interview by an asylum officer under subsection (f).
“(f) Asylum interviews
“(1) Credible fear of persecution defined—In this subsection, the term credible fear of persecution means, after taking into account the credibility of the statements made by an unaccompanied alien child in support of the alien’s claim and such other facts as are known to the asylum officer, there is a significant possibility that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum under section 208.
“(2) Conduct by asylum officer—An asylum officer shall conduct the interviews of an unaccompanied alien child referred under subsection (e)(3).
“(3) Referral of certain aliens—If the asylum officer determines at the time of the interview that an unaccompanied alien child has a credible fear of persecution, the alien shall be held in the custody of the Secretary for Health and Human Services pursuant to section 235(b) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232(b)) during further consideration of the application for asylum.
“(4) Removal without further review if no credible fear of persecution
“(A) In general—Subject to subparagraph (C), if the asylum officer determines that an unaccompanied alien child does not have a credible fear of persecution, the asylum officer shall order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review.
“(B) Record of determination—The asylum officer shall prepare a written record of a determination under subparagraph (A), which shall include—
“(i) a summary of the material facts as stated by the alien;
“(ii) such additional facts (if any) relied upon by the asylum officer;
“(iii) the asylum officer's analysis of why, in light of such facts, the alien has not established a credible fear of persecution; and
“(iv) a copy of the asylum officer’s interview notes.
“(C) Review of determination
“(i) Rulemaking—The Attorney General shall establish, by regulation, a process by which an immigration judge will conduct a prompt review, upon the alien’s request, of a determination under subparagraph (A) that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution.
“(ii) Mandatory components—The review described in clause (i)—
“(I) shall include an opportunity for the alien to be heard and questioned by the immigration judge, either in person or by telephonic or video connection; and
“(II) shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible, to the maximum extent practicable within 24 hours, but in no case later than 7 days after the date of the determination under subparagraph (A).
“(D) Mandatory protective custody—Any alien subject to the procedures under this paragraph shall be held in the custody of the Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant to section 235(b) of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232(b))—
“(i) pending a final determination of an application for asylum under this subsection; and
“(ii) after a determination under this subsection that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution, until the alien is removed.
“(g) Limitation on administrative review
“(1) In general—Except as provided in subsection (f)(4)(C) and paragraph (2), a removal order entered in accordance with subsection (e)(2) or (f)(4)(A) is not subject to administrative appeal.
“(2) Rulemaking—The Attorney General shall establish, by regulation, a process for the prompt review of an order under subsection (e)(2) against an alien who claims under oath, or as permitted under penalty of perjury under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, after having been warned of the penal ties for falsely making such claim under such conditions to have been—
“(A) lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
“(B) admitted as a refugee under section 207; or
“(C) granted asylum under section 208.
“(h) Last in, first out—In any proceedings, determinations, or removals under this section, priority shall be accorded to the alien who has most recently arrived in the United States.”