Division C — Department of Energy national security authorizations and other authorizations
C Department of Energy national security authorizations and other authorizations
XXXI Department of Energy national security programs
A National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3102 Defense environmental cleanup
Sec. 3103 Other defense activities
B Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111 Establishment of Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation in National Nuclear Security Administration
“3221. Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation
“(a) Establishment—There is in the Administration a Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (in this section referred to as the “Director”), who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(b) Duties
“(1) The Director shall be the principal officer of the Administration responsible for communicating directly with the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of Energy, and the Secretary of Energy with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration.
“(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility for receiving or acting on communications from the Director with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration.
“(c) Deputy Directors—There shall be two deputy directors, who shall report directly to the Director, as follows:
“(1) The Deputy Director for Cost Estimation.
“(2) The Deputy Director for Program Evaluation.
“(d) Activities for cost estimation
“(1) The Director shall be the responsible for the following activities relating to cost estimation:
“(A) Prescribing policies and procedures for cost analysis and estimation by the Administration, including the determination of confidence levels with respect to cost estimates.
“(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the performance baseline for each major atomic energy defense acquisition program.
“(C) Establishing policies and procedures for developing technology readiness assessments for such programs that are consistent with the guidelines of the Department of Energy for technology readiness assessments.
“(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments for such programs to ensure that such programs are meeting levels of confidence associated with appropriate overall system performance.
“(E) Reviewing costs and, if necessary, conducting independent cost estimates of projects covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to program and project management for the acquisition of capital assets) (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities.
“(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is an inherently governmental function and may not be conducted by a national security laboratory or a contractor of the Administration. The Director may use data collected by such a laboratory or contractor in conducting such a review, evaluation, or cost estimate.
“(3) The Director shall submit in writing to the Administrator the following:
“(A) The certification of the Director with respect to each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1).
“(B) A statement of the confidence level of the Director with respect to each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate, including an identification of areas of uncertainty in each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate.
“(4) The Administrator shall transmit each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees with any additional comments of the Administrator supporting or disputing the review, evaluation, or cost estimate.
“(e) Activities for program evaluation
“(1) The Director shall be responsible for the following activities relating to program evaluation:
“(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and procedures for setting requirements for the future-years nuclear security program under section 3253 and for prioritizing and estimating the funding required by the Administration for that program.
“(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security program on an annual basis to ensure that the program is accurate and thorough.
“(C) Prescribing policies and procedures for initiating analyses of alternatives for major atomic energy defense acquisition programs.
“(D) As part of the planning, programming, and budgeting process of the Administration under sections 3251 and 3252, analyzing the planning phase of that process, preparing programmatic and fiscal year guidance, and managing the program review phase of that process.
“(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the Selected Acquisition Reports and independent cost estimates on nuclear weapons systems undergoing major life extension under section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537).
“(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for projects under section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) and managing notifications to the congressional defense committees of cost overruns under that section.
“(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) is an inherently governmental function and may not be conducted by a national security laboratory or a contractor of the Administration. The Director may use data collected by such a laboratory or contractor in conducting such a review.
“(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on any major programmatic deviations from the future-years nuclear security program discovered in conducting a review under paragraph (1)(B) at or about the time the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year.
“(f) Staff—The Administrator shall ensure that the Director has sufficient numbers of personnel who have competence in technical and budgetary matters to carry out the functions required by this section.
“(g) Reports by Director—The Director shall submit to Congress at or about the time that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2018, a report that includes the following:
“(1) A description of activities related to developing accurate and timely budget formulation conducted by the Director during the calendar year preceding the submission of the report.
“(2) An assessment of efforts to develop accurate cost estimates and analyses, including of technology readiness assessments.
“(3) An assessment of deficiencies in developing an integrated list of requirements for programs and projects of the Administration using available resources.
“(4) A list of all major atomic energy defense acquisition programs and projects covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities and a concise description of the status of each such program and project in meeting cost and critical milestones.
“(h) Briefing by Comptroller General of the United States—Not later than 90 days after the Director submits a report to Congress under subsection (g), the Comptroller General of the United States shall brief Congress on the following:
“(1) The assessment of the Comptroller General with respect to the report submitted under subsection (g).
“(2) Recommendations for improving the ability of the Director to perform the functions required by this section, including recommendations with respect to the availability of personnel and resources to carry out those functions.
“(i) Definitions—In this section:
“(1) Major atomic energy defense acquisition program
“(A) In general—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term major atomic energy defense acquisition program means an atomic energy defense acquisition program of the Administration—
“(i) the total project cost of which is more than $50,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2012 constant dollars); or
“(ii) the total lifetime cost of which is more than $350,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2012 constant dollars).
“(B) Exclusion of capital assets acquisition projects—The term major atomic energy defense acquisition program does not include a project covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities.
“(2) Performance baseline—The term performance baseline, with respect to a major atomic energy defense acquisition program, means the key parameters with respect to performance, scope, cost, and schedule for the project budget of the program.”
Sec. 3112 Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise
“4714. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise
“(a) Plan required
“(1) The Administrator shall develop a plan for improving and integrating the financial management of the nuclear security enterprise.
“(2) The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
“(A) A structure for the allocation of work to be used by the entities within the nuclear security enterprise for the activities carried out by those entities, including activities for which funds are transferred from the Department of Defense to the Administration.
“(B) A clear and easily understandable cost structure for each entity within the nuclear security enterprise.
“(C) A methodology for identifying costs for programs of record and base capabilities required for programs carried out by the nuclear security enterprise.
“(D) A system for monitoring those programs during the execution of those programs and to provide data to inform oversight of those programs.
“(E) A reporting system to be used by the entities within the nuclear security enterprise to facilitate analyses, projections, and comparisons of similar activities carried out by different entities within the nuclear security enterprise.
“(F) A plan for providing sufficient resources to implement the plan required by paragraph (1).
“(3) The Administrator shall submit the plan required by paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees not later than February 15, 2014.
“(4) The Administrator shall implement the plan required by paragraph (1) by not later than the date that is 4 years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
“(b) Review by Comptroller General of the United States
“(1) Not later than the date that is 4 years and 6 months after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a) and submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review.
“(2) For the first fiscal year that begins after the submission of the report required by paragraph (1) and each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter, the Comptroller General shall—
“(A) review the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a), with particular attention to elements of the plan that are not fully implemented; and
“(B) not later than 180 days after the end of the fiscal year, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review.”
Sec. 3113 Certification of security measures at atomic energy defense facilities
“4510. Certification of security measures at atomic energy defense facilities
“(a) In general—Not later than January 1, 2014, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Energy shall—
“(1) review the security measures of each facility specified in subsection (b) that contains Category I or Category II special nuclear material; and
“(2) submit to the congressional defense committees a certification with respect to whether such measures—
“(A) provide for the effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material; and
“(B) meet the standards and regulations of the Department of Energy for the physical protection of facilities and surrounding infrastructure containing such material.
“(b) Facilities specified—The facilities specified in this subsection are the following:
“(1) The national security laboratories.
“(2) The nuclear weapons production facilities.
“(3) The defense nuclear facilities at which defense environmental cleanup activities are occurring.
“(c) Plan for laboratories and facilities that do not meet standards
“(1) If the Secretary determines under subsection (a)(2) that the security measures of a facility specified in subsection (b) do not provide for the effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material or do not meet the standards and regulations described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall develop and implement a plan for ensuring that such measures are improved to provide for effective protection of such material and to meet such standards and regulations in an expeditious manner.
“(2) The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees with the certification required by subsection (a)(2) the following:
“(A) Each plan developed under paragraph (1) with respect to a facility specified in subsection (b).
“(B) An estimate of the time required to ensure that the security measures of that facility provide for effective protection of Category I and Category II special nuclear material and meet the standards and regulations described in subsection (a)(2).
“(C) An assessment of whether it is in the national security interests of the United States to keep that facility in routine operations and, if so, a description of the temporary mitigating measures to be taken to maintain routine operations at the facility.
“(3) Not later than 30 days after the submission of the certification under subsection (a)(2), the Inspector General of the Department of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of each plan developed under paragraph (1).
“(d) Form of reports—Each certification required by subsection (a)(2) and each plan and report required by subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.”
Sec. 3114 Plan for incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program
“4219. Plan for incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program
“(a) Plan required—The Administrator shall develop and carry out a plan to incorporate exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 during the 20-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
“(b) Milestones—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include major programmatic milestones in the development of a prototype exascale computer for the stockpile stewardship program.
“(c) Coordination with other agencies—In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall coordinate, as appropriate, with the Under Secretary of Energy for Science, the Secretary of Defense, and elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))).
“(d) Inclusion of costs in future-years nuclear security program—The Administrator shall address the costs of incorporating exascale computing into the stockpile stewardship program in the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).
“(e) Submission to Congress; report
“(1) The Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees, at or about the same time the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, in each even-numbered year, the following:
“(A) The plan required by subsection (a).
“(B) A report that describes advances outside the United States in exascale computing for defense and nondefense applications.
“(2) Each plan and report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex if necessary.
“(f) Exascale computing defined—In this section, the term exascale computing means computing through the use of a computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th power floating point operations per second.”
Sec. 3115 Integrated plutonium strategy
“4220. Integrated plutonium strategy
“(a) In general—The Administration shall include in the plan required by 4203 a strategy for the integrated management of plutonium for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs over a 20-year period.
“(b) Elements—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
“(1) An assessment of the baseline science issues necessary to understand plutonium aging under static and dynamic conditions under manufactured and nonmanufactured plutonium geometries.
“(2) An assessment of scientific and testing instrumentation for plutonium at elemental and bulk conditions.
“(3) An assessment of manufacturing and handling technology for plutonium and plutonium components.
“(4) An assessment of computational models of plutonium performance under static and dynamic loading, including manufactured and nonmanufactured conditions.
“(5) An identification of any capability gaps with respect to the assessments described in paragraphs (1) through (4).
“(6) An estimate of costs relating to the issues, instrumentation, technology, and models described in paragraphs (1) through (4) over the period covered by the future-years nuclear security program under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).
“(7) An estimate of the cost of eliminating the capability gaps identified under paragraph (5) over the period covered by the future-years nuclear security program.
“(8) Such other items as the Administrator considers important for the integrated management of plutonium for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs.
“(c) Review
“(1) The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences to review the strategy required by subsection (a).
“(2) The review required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than one year after the submission of the first plan required under section 4203 that includes the strategy required by subsection (a).”
Sec. 3116 Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico
“(1) Limitation on use of funds—Except as provided in paragraph (2), no funds”
“(2) Use of funds for modular building strategy—The Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and expend funds referred to in paragraph (1) for activities relating to a modular building strategy on and after the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, notifies the congressional defense committees that—
“(A) the modular building strategy meets requirements for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile over a 30-year period;
“(B) in fiscal year 2015, the National Nuclear Security Administration will begin the process of designing and building modular buildings in accordance with Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets); and
“(C) the Administrator will include the costs of the modular building strategy in the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453).
“(3) Modular building strategy defined—In this subsection, the term modular building strategy means an alternative strategy to the replacement project that consists of constructing a series of modular structures, each of which is fully useable, to complement the function of the plutonium facility (PF-4) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, in accordance with all applicable safety and security standards of the Department of Energy.”
Sec. 3117 Increase in construction design threshold
Sec. 3118 Clarification of form of submission of cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear facilities
“(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex if necessary.”
C Reports
Sec. 3121 Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration
Sec. 3122 Modification of reviews relating to cost-benefit analyses of management and operating contracts of the National Nuclear Security Administration
“(c) Review by Comptroller General of the United States
“(1) In general—The Comptroller General of the United States shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), review reports submitted to the congressional defense committees under subsection (a) or (d)(2) at such times as the Comptroller General, in consultation with such committees, determines appropriate.
“(2) Exception—The Comptroller General may not conduct a review under paragraph (1) of a report relating to a contract to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration while a protest concerning an alleged violation of a procurement statute or regulation brought under subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31, United States Code, is pending with respect to that contract.”
Sec. 3123 Modification of deadline for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation
“(3) Waiver—The Administrator may waive the requirement under paragraph (1) to submit a report on a modification in the program under subsection (a) not later than 30 days before making the modification if the Administrator—
“(A) determines that the modification is urgent and necessary to the national security interests of the United States; and
“(B) not later than 30 days after making the modification, submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
“(i) the report on the modification required by paragraph (1); and
“(ii) a justification for exercising the waiver authority under this paragraph.”
Sec. 3124 Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project
“(1) In general—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the project referred to in subsection (a)—
“(A) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90 days thereafter through the date that is one year after such date of enactment; and
“(B) after the date that is one year after such date of enactment, at such times as the Comptroller General, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, determines appropriate, taking into consideration the critical decision points of the project (as defined in orders of the Department of Energy).”
Sec. 3125 Submission of interim report of Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise
D Technical corrections
Sec. 3131 Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration Act
Sec. 3132 Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act
“(5) The terms defense nuclear facility and Department of Energy defense nuclear facility have the meaning given the term Department of Energy defense nuclear facility in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).”
“(8) The term Nuclear Weapons Council means the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code.”
“(A) the nuclear weapons production facilities; and”
“(C) that is a defense critical technology (as defined in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code).”
XXXII Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Sec. 3201 Authorization
XXXV Maritime Administration
Sec. 3501 Maritime Administration
“§ 109. Maritime administration
“(a) Organization and mission—The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States.
“(b) Maritime administrator—The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary.
“(c) Deputy maritime administrator—The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.
“(d) Duties and powers vested in secretary—All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary.
“(e) Regional offices—The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices.
“(f) Interagency and industry relations—The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities.
“(g) Detailing officers from armed forces—To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the armed forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail.
“(h) Contracts, cooperative agreements, and audits
“(1) Contracts and cooperative agreements—In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to—
“(A) carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and
“(B) protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness.
“(2) Audits—The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.
“(i) Grant administrative expenses—Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.
“(j) Authorization of appropriations
“(1) In general—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration.
“(2) Limitations—Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for—
“(A) acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of vessels;
“(B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels;
“(C) costs of national defense features;
“(D) payments of obligations incurred for operating-differential subsidies;
“(E) expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations;
“(F) the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund;
“(G) National Defense Reserve Fleet expenses;
“(H) expenses necessary to carry out part B of subtitle V of title 46; and
“(I) other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration.
“(3) Training vessels—Amounts may not be appropriated for the purchase or construction of training vessels for State maritime academies unless the Secretary has approved a plan for sharing training vessels between State maritime academies.”