US Codex
Bill
Notes

Division A — Department of Defense Authorizations

H.R. 1960 · 113th Congress · Jul 8, 2013 · Lineage

A Department of Defense Authorizations

I Procurement

A Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 101 Authorization of appropriations

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.

B Army Programs

Sec. 111 Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program

(a)
Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits the report under subsection (b).
(b)
Report required— The Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory located in Auburn, Washington, cited in the report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (number 2013–025) dated November 30, 2012. The report submitted under this subsection shall include the following:
(1)
The status of the implementation by the Secretary of the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the report by the Inspector General.
(2)
The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that may still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
(3)
The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse that are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles.
(4)
A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining the inventory of parts no longer usable by the Secretary.
(5)
Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.

C Navy Programs

Sec. 121 Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program

(a)
Authority for multiyear procurement— Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into—
(1)
one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E–2D aircraft; and
(2)
one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract entered into under paragraph (1).
(b)
Condition for out-year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.

Sec. 122 Cost limitation for CVN–78 aircraft carriers

(a)
In general— Section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) is amended to read as follows:

“122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers

“(a) Limitation

“(1) Lead ship—The total amount obligated from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78 may not exceed $12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).

“(2) Follow-on ships—The total amount obligated from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for the construction of any ship that is constructed in the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers after the lead ship of that class may not exceed $11,411,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)).

“(b) Adjustment of limitation amount—The Secretary of the Navy may adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for any ship constructed in the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers by the following:

“(1) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2013.

“(2) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or local laws.

“(3) The amounts of outfitting costs and post-delivery costs incurred for that ship.

“(4) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to insertion of new technology into that ship, as compared to the technology baseline as it was defined in the approved acquisition program baseline estimate of December 2005.

“(5) The amounts of increases or decreases to nonrecurring design and engineering cost attributable to achieving compliance with the cost limitation.

“(6) The amounts of increases or decreases to cost required to correct deficiencies that may affect the safety of the ship and personnel or otherwise preclude the ship from safe operations and crew certification.

“(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to the shipboard test program.

“(c) Limitation on technology insertion cost adjustment—The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under paragraph (4) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for a ship referred to in that subsection with respect to insertion of new technology into that ship only if—

“(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology would lower the life-cycle cost of the ship; or

“(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology is required to meet an emerging threat and the Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that such threat poses grave harm to national security.

“(d) Notice

“(1) Requirement—The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees each year, at the same time that the budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year, written notice of—

“(A) any change in the amount set forth in subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year that the Secretary has determined to be associated with a cost referred to in subsection (b); and

“(B) the most accurate estimate possible of the Secretary with respect to the total cost compared to the amount set forth in subsection (a), as adjusted by subsection (b), and the steps the Secretary is taking to reduce the costs below such amount.

“(2) Effective date—The requirement in paragraph (1) shall become effective with the budget request for the year of procurement of the first ship referred to in subsection (a).”

(b)
Conforming amendment— The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 122 and inserting the following:

D Air Force Programs

Sec. 131 Multiyear procurement authority for multiple variants of the C–130J aircraft program

(a)
Authority for multiyear procurement— Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into—
(1)
one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of multiple variants of C–130J aircraft for the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Air Force; and
(2)
one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract entered into under paragraph (1).
(b)
Condition for out-year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.

Sec. 132 Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft

(a)
Prohibition— The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft.
(b)
Conforming repeal— Section 143 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1662) is repealed.

Sec. 133 Retirement of KC–135R aircraft

(a)
Treatment of retired KC–135R aircraft— Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain each KC–135R aircraft that is retired by the Secretary in a condition that would allow recall of that aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force structure.
(b)
Exception— Subsection (a) shall not apply to a KC–135R aircraft that the Secretary transfers or sells to allies or partner nations of the United States.
(c)
Delivery of KC–46A aircraft— For each KC–46A aircraft that is delivered to the Air Force and the Commander of the Air Mobility Command initially certifies as mission capable, the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a) with respect to one retired KC–135R aircraft.
(d)
Conforming repeal— Section 135 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114) is repealed.

Sec. 134 Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The new acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program of the Air Force will maintain mission assurance, reduce costs, and provide opportunities for competition for certified launch providers.
(2)
The method in which the current and potential future certified launch providers will be evaluated in a competition is still under development.
(b)
Plan—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop and implement a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors in awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch vehicle provider.
(2)
Comparison— The plan under paragraph (1) shall include a description of how the following areas will be addressed in the evaluation:
(A)
The proposed cost, schedule, and performance.
(B)
Mission assurance activities.
(C)
The manner in which the contractor will operate under the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(D)
The effect of other contracts in which the contractor is entered into with the Federal Government, such as the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability contract and the space station commercial resupply services contracts.
(E)
Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate.
(c)
Submission to Congress—
(1)
In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall—
(A)
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
(B)
provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
(2)
GAO review— The Comptroller General of the United States shall—
(A)
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a review of the plan under subsection (b)(1); or
(B)
provide to such committees a briefing on such plan.
(3)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(A)
The congressional defense committees.
(B)
The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(C)
The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

E Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Sec. 141 Multiyear procurement authority for ground-based interceptors

(a)
Authority for multiyear procurement— Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of 14 ground-based interceptors.
(b)
Authority for advance procurement— The Director may enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement associated with the ground-based interceptors for which authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract is provided under subsection (a).
(c)
Condition for out-year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.

Sec. 142 Multiyear procurement authority for tactical wheeled vehicles

(a)
Authority for multiyear procurement— Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more multiyear, multivehicle contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of core tactical wheeled vehicles.
(b)
Condition for out-year contract payments— A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
(c)
Notification required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of—
(1)
whether the Secretary will enter into a contract under subsection (a); and
(2)
if not, an explanation for why the Secretary will not enter into such a contract.
(d)
Annual reports— For each fiscal year in which the Secretary is entered into a contract under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, as part of the material submitted in support of the budget of the President for such fiscal year, as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the following:
(1)
The status of procurements under such contract.
(2)
A detailed analysis of any cost savings achieved for each class of vehicle procured under such contract.
(3)
A description of any challenges to the Secretary in carrying out this section or in achieving any such cost savings.
(4)
Any recommendations for future implementation of a program for multiyear, multi-vehicle procurement.
(e)
Termination of authority— The Secretary may not enter into a contract under this section after September 30, 2018. During the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2018, the Secretary may continue to carry out any contract entered into under this section before such date using funds made available to the Secretary for such purpose before such date.
(f)
Core tactical vehicles defined— In this section, the term “core tactical wheeled vehicles” means—
(1)
the family of medium tactical vehicles;
(2)
medium tactical wheeled vehicle replacements;
(3)
the family of heavy tactical vehicles; and
(4)
logistics vehicle system replacements.

Sec. 143 Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems

(a)
Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage an RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system.
(b)
Maintained levels— During the period preceding December 31, 2016, in supporting the operational requirements of the combatant commands, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain the operational capability of each RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system belonging to the Air Force or delivered to the Air Force during such period.
(c)
Conforming amendment— Section 154 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1666) is amended—
(1)
by striking “(a) Limitation.—”; and
(2)
by striking subsection (b).

Sec. 144 Personal protection equipment procurement

(a)
Procurement— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that personal protection equipment is procured using funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 and available for such purpose as specified in the funding table in sections 4101 and 4102.
(b)
Procurement line item— In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each military department procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for personal protection equipment.
(c)
Personal protection equipment defined— In this section, the term “personal protection equipment” means the following:
(1)
Body armor components.
(2)
Combat helmets.
(3)
Combat protective eyewear.
(4)
Protective clothing.
(5)
Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

Sec. 145 Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements

Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4157) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (b); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

Sec. 146 Study on procurement of personal protection equipment

(a)
Study—
(1)
In general— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to identify and assess alternative and effective means for stimulating competition and innovation in the personal protection equipment industrial base.
(2)
Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any findings and recommendations.
(b)
Report—
(1)
In general— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
Matters included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
The study, findings, and recommendations submitted to the Secretary under subsection (a)(2).
(B)
An assessment of current and future technologies that could markedly improve body armor, including by decreasing weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant improvements.
(C)
An analysis of the capability of the personal protection equipment industrial base to leverage such technologies to produce the next generation body armor.
(D)
An assessment of alternative body armor acquisition models, including different types of contracting and budgeting practices of the Department of Defense.
(c)
Personal protection equipment— In this section, the term “personal protection equipment” includes body armor.

II Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

A Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 201 Authorization of appropriations

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201.

B Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 211 Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(1)
An independent assessment of the draft milestone B documentation for the ground combat vehicle that—
(A)
is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, or other similar official; and
(B)
analyzes whether there is a sufficient business case to proceed with the engineering and manufacturing development phase for the ground combat vehicle using only one contractor.
(2)
A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat vehicle program has—
(A)
feasible and fully-defined requirements;
(B)
fully mature technologies;
(C)
independent and high-confidence cost estimates;
(D)
available funding; and
(E)
a realistic and achievable schedule.

Sec. 212 Limitation on Milestone A activities for Unmanned Carrier-launched Surveillance and Strike system program

The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics may not award a Milestone A technology development contract with respect to the Unmanned Carrier-launched Surveillance and Strike system program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the software and system engineering designs for the control system and connectivity and aircraft carrier segments of such program can achieve, with low level of integration risk, successful compatibility and interoperability with the air vehicle segment selected for contract award with respect to such program.

Sec. 213 Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for logistics information technology, including for the expeditionary combat support system, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will modernize and update the logistics information technology systems of the Air Force following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat support system. Such report shall include—
(1)
strategies to—
(A)
in the near term, address any gaps in capability with respect to logistics information technology; and
(B)
during the period covered by the current future-years defense plan, provide for long-term modernization of logistics information technology;
(2)
an analysis of the root causes leading to the failure of the expeditionary combat support system program; and
(3)
a plan of action by the Secretary to ensure that the lessons learned under such analysis are—
(A)
shared throughout the Department of Defense and the military departments; and
(B)
considered in program planning for similar logistics information technology systems.

Sec. 214 Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of the Air Force

(a)
Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 0202088F), not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence.
(b)
Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of how the Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence is used to support the software assurance activities of the Air Force and other elements of the Department of Defense, including pursuant to section 933 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
(2)
A description of the resources used to support the Center of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through fiscal year 2014.
(3)
The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center of Excellence during the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 215 Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition program

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended for the precision extended range munition program until the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees written certification that—
(1)
such program is necessary to meet a valid operational need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided mortar munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or aerial-delivered joint fires; and
(2)
a sufficient business case exists to proceed with development and production of such program.

Sec. 216 Limitation on availability of funds for the program manager for biometrics of the Department of Defense

(a)
Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics for future biometric architectures or systems, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the future program structure for biometrics oversight and execution and architectural requirements for biometrics enabling capability.
(b)
Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager for biometrics, and the Biometrics Identity Management Agency, including an analysis of alternatives to evaluate—
(A)
how to better align responsibilities for the multiple elements of the military departments and the Department of Defense with responsibility for biometrics, including the Navy and the Marine Corps; the Office of the Provost Marshall General, and the intelligence community; and
(B)
whether the program management responsibilities of the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics should be retained by the Army or transferred to another military department or element of the Department based on the expected future operating environment.
(2)
An assessment of the current requirements for the biometrics enabling capability to ensure the capability continues to meet the needs of the relevant military departments and elements of the Department of Defense based on the future operating environment after the drawdown in Afghanistan.
(3)
An analysis of the need to merge the program management structures and systems architecture and requirements development process for biometrics and forensics applications.

Sec. 217 Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement

Not later than October 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall demonstrate, with respect to the X–47B unmanned combat air system aircraft, the following:
(1)
Unmanned autonomous rendezvous and aerial-refueling operations using the receptacle and probe equipment of the X–47B aircraft.
(2)
The ability of such aircraft to on-load fuel from airborne tanker aircraft using both the boom and drogue equipment installed on the tanker aircraft.

Sec. 218 Long-range standoff weapon requirement

The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a follow-on air-launched cruise missile to the AGM–86 that—
(1)
achieves initial operating capability for both conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030; and
(2)
is certified for internal carriage and employment for both conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation long-range strike bomber by not later than 2034.

Sec. 219 Review of software development for F–35 aircraft

(a)
Review— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of software for the F–35 aircraft program (in this section referred to as the “software development program”), including by reviewing the progress made in—
(1)
managing the software development program; and
(2)
delivering critical software capability in accordance with current program milestones.
(b)
Report— Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment by the independent team with respect to whether the software development program—
(A)
has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates occurring before the date of the report; and
(B)
will be successful in meeting the established program schedule.
(2)
Any recommendations of the independent team with respect to improving the software development program to ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational testing, the established program schedule is met on time.
(3)
If the independent team determines that the software development program will be unable to deliver the full complement of software within the established program schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent team considers appropriate to deliver such software within such schedule.

Sec. 220 Evaluation and assessment of the Distributed Common Ground System

(a)
Project codes for budget submissions— In the budget transmitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within the distributed common ground system program shall be set forth as a separate project code within the program element line, and each covered official shall submit supporting justification for the project code within the program element descriptive summary.
(b)
Analysis—
(1)
Requirement— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an analysis of commercial link analysis tools that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet the requirements of the distributed common ground system program.
(2)
Elements— The analysis required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
Revalidation of the distributed common ground system program requirements for link analysis tools based on current program needs, recent operational experience, and the requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles.
(B)
Market research of current commercially available link analysis tools to determine which tools, if any, could potentially satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A).
(C)
Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any commercially available link analysis tools identified in subparagraph (B).
(3)
Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the results of the analysis conducted under paragraph (1).
(c)
Competition required—
(1)
In general— Except as provided by paragraph (3), if the Under Secretary identifies one or more commercial link analysis tools under subsection (b) (other than such tools offered by the current technology provider) that meet the requirements for the distributed common ground system program, including the requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles, each covered official shall initiate a request for proposals for such link analysis tools by not later than 180 days after the Under Secretary makes such identification. Such a request for proposals shall be based on market research and competitive procedures in accordance with applicable law and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
(2)
Notification— Each covered official shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of any request for proposals issued under paragraph (1) by not later than 30 days after such request is issued.
(3)
Waiver of RFP timeline— If a covered official determines that issuing a request for proposals by the date specified in paragraph (1) would not be aligned with the acquisition or developmental milestones of the distributed common ground station program, the covered official may waive the requirement to issue such a request for proposals by such date if the covered official submits to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such waiver that includes—
(A)
the reasons for making such a waiver; and
(B)
identification of when in the acquisition timeline of such program that the covered official plans to issue the request for proposals.
(d)
Covered official defined— In this section, the term “covered official” means the following:
(1)
The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army.
(2)
The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters concerning the Navy.
(3)
The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force.
(4)
The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to matters concerning the Marine Corps.
(5)
The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States Special Operations Command.

Sec. 221 Requirement to complete individual carbine testing

The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual carbine program unless the Secretary—
(1)
completes the Phase III down-select and user-evaluation phase of the individual carbine competitors;
(2)
conducts the required comprehensive business case analysis of such program; and
(3)
submits to the congressional defense committees—
(A)
the results of the down-select and user evaluation described in paragraph (1); and
(B)
the business case analysis described in paragraph (2).

Sec. 222 Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for Navy laser weapon system

(a)
In general— The Secretary shall ensure that each future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, that covers any of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 includes a funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon system with respect to such fiscal years.
(b)
Alternative report— If the Secretary determines that the technology and maturation efforts of a Navy laser weapon system conducted prior to fiscal year 2016 do not indicate that suitable technology warranting a program of record for such system will be available by 2018, the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written justification of such determination, including a description of the technical shortcomings of such system, by not later than March 30, 2016.

Sec. 223 Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Polaris Sales Agreement of 1963 formally arranged for the Polaris missile system to be purchased by the United Kingdom for its submarines. It was extended in 1982 to include the Trident missile system and this agreement continues to underpin the independent nuclear deterrent of the United Kingdom.
(2)
April 2013 marked the 50-year anniversary of the agreement.
(3)
Since the inception of the agreement, the agreement has been a tremendous success and provided great benefits to both nations by creating major cost savings, stronger nuclear deterrence, and a stronger alliance.
(4)
The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement of the United States and the Vanguard-class ballistic missile successor of the United Kingdom will share a common missile compartment and the Trident II/D5 strategic weapon system.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure that the common missile compartment associated with the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of the United Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based strategic deterrence.

Sec. 224 Sense of congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile project

It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
following the successful joint technology capability demonstration that the counter-electronics high power microwave missile project (in this section referred to as “CHAMP”) conducted last year, the Air Force should examine the results of the demonstration and consider the demonstration as a potential solution during any analysis of alternatives conducted in 2014;
(2)
an analysis of alternatives is an important step in the long term-term development of a high power microwave weapon;
(3)
additionally, a near-term option may be available to get such capability to commanders of the combatant commands should the capability be required;
(4)
the Secretary of the Air Force should pursue both near- and long-term high power microwave weapon systems;
(5)
CHAMP could be developed as a cruise missile delivered weapon with target availability to commanders of the combatant commands by 2016; and
(6)
such development should not prohibit or divert resources from an analysis of alternatives and long-term development of a high power microwave weapon.

Sec. 225 Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared systems space program

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended for the space-based infrared systems space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed until the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office in accordance with section 2273a of title 10, United States Code.

C Missile Defense Programs

Sec. 231 Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program

(a)
Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the medium extended air defense system.
(b)
Harvesting technology—
(1)
Notice and wait— The Secretary of Defense may not carry out actions described in paragraph (2) until a period of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of the plans of the Secretary to carry out such actions.
(2)
Actions described— Actions described in this paragraph are actions relating to harvesting technology of the medium extended air defense system.
(c)
Report—
(1)
In general— Not later than February 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the opportunities to harvest technology of the medium extended air defense system to modernize the various air and missile defense systems and integrated architecture of the Army, based on the report required by section 226 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678).
(2)
Matters included— The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
A review of current Army and joint requirements to which any harvested technology of the medium extended air defense system might be applied.
(B)
The timeline of the Secretary for completion of an analysis of alternatives to technologies and systems being considered for harvesting.
(C)
An overview of the planned acquisition strategy for any major systems being considered for harvesting and for insertion into the integrated air and missile defense architecture.
(d)
Application— The prohibition in subsection (a) may not be superseded except by a provision of law that specifically supersedes, repeals, or modifies such subsection.

Sec. 232 Additional missile defense site in the United States for optimized protection of the homeland

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama have each recognized the necessity for an additional measure of protection–beyond missile defense sites in Alaska and California–for defending the United States against intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) threats emanating from the Middle East.
(2)
General Jacoby, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, testified before Congress that “we should consider that Iran has a capability within the next few years of flight testing ICBM capable technologies” and that “the Iranians are intent on developing an ICBM”.
(3)
General Kehler, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, testified before Congress that “I am confident that we can defend against a limited attack from Iran, although we are not in the most optimum posture to do that today * * * it doesn’t provide total defense today”.
(4)
General Jacoby also testified before Congress that “I would agree that a third site, wherever the decision is to build a third site, would give me better weapons access, increased GBI inventory and allow us the battle space to more optimize our defense against future threats from Iran and North Korea”.
(5)
Section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678) directs the Missile Defense Agency—
(A)
to conduct environmental impact studies for three potential locations for an additional missile defense site capable of protecting the homeland; and
(B)
to develop a contingency plan in case the President determines to proceed with deployment of such an additional site.
(6)
According the Missile Defense Agency, the cost to deploy up to 20 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) at a new missile defense site on the East Coast of the United States is approximately $3,000,000,000 and would require approximately 5 to 6 years to complete.
(b)
Additional missile defense site—
(1)
In general— The Missile Defense Agency shall construct and make operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional homeland missile defense site capable of protecting the homeland, designed to complement existing sites in Alaska and California, to deal more effectively with the long-range ballistic missile threat from the Middle East.
(2)
Requirement in addition to other required activities regarding missile defense sites— The Missile Defense Agency shall carry out the requirement in paragraph (1) to construct and deploy an additional homeland missile defense site (including any advance procurement and engineering and design in connection with such site) while continuing to meet the requirement to prepare environmental impact statements and a contingency plan under section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 for the missile defense sites described in that section.
(3)
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to Congress a report on the missile defense site required to be constructed and deployed under paragraph (1). The report shall include a description of the current estimate of the funding to be required for construction and deployment of the missile defense site, including for advance procurement, engineering and design, materials and construction, interceptor missiles, and sensors.

Sec. 233 Limitation on removal of missile defense equipment from East Asia

(a)
Policy— It is the policy of the United States that—
(1)
the missile defenses of the United States provide defense against multiple threats, including threats to the United States, allies of the United States, and the deployed forces of the United States; and
(2)
the elimination of one threat, for example the illegal nuclear weapons program of a rogue state, does not eliminate the reason the United States deploys missile defenses to a particular region, including to defend allies of the United States and deployed forces of the United States from other regional threats.
(b)
Limitation— Except as provided by subsection (c) or (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to remove missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia until a period of 180 days has elapsed following the date on which the President certifies to the congressional defense committees the following:
(1)
Each country in East Asia that poses a threat to allies of the United States has verifiably dismantled the nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs of such country.
(2)
The President has consulted with such allies with respect to the dismantlement described in paragraph (1) that—
(A)
such dismantlement has occurred; and
(B)
the missile defense platforms of the United States located in East Asia are no longer needed.
(c)
Waiver— The President may waive the limitation in subsection (b) with respect to removing missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia if—
(1)
the President submits to the congressional defense committees—
(A)
a certification that such waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and
(B)
a report, in unclassified form, explaining—
(i)
why the President cannot make a certification for such removal under subsection (b);
(ii)
the national security interest covered by the certification made under subparagraph (A); and
(iii)
how the President will provide a commensurate level of defense for the United States, allies of the United States, and deployed forces of the United States, as provided by such missile defense equipment being removed; and
(2)
a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the President submits the information under paragraph (1).
(d)
Exception— The limitation in subsection (b) shall not apply to destroyers and cruisers of the Navy equipped with the Aegis ballistic missile defense system.

Sec. 234 Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system

(a)
In general— Section 225 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(3)(A), by inserting “comprehensive” before “life-cycle”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:

“(e) Quality of cost estimates

“(1) The Director shall ensure that each cost estimate included in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3) includes all operation and support costs, regardless of funding source, for which the Director is responsible.

“(2) In each such baseline submitted to the congressional defense committees, the Director shall state whether the underlying cost estimates in such baseline meet the criteria of the Comptroller General of the United States to be considered a high-quality estimate. If the Director states that such estimates do not meet such criteria, the Director shall include in such baseline the actions, including a schedule, that the Director plans to carry out for the estimates to meet such criteria.”

(b)
Report— Not later than February 15, 2014, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report of the plans and schedule of the Director with respect to when the Director will meet the quality and criteria of cost estimates required by section 225(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2).

Sec. 235 Analysis of alternatives for successor to precision tracking space system

(a)
Analysis of alternatives required—
(1)
In general— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in cooperation with the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation and the Defense Space Council, shall perform an analysis of alternatives for a successor to the precision tracking space system.
(2)
Consideration— The Director shall ensure that the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) considers the following:
(A)
Current and future terrestrial, airborne, and space capabilities and capability gaps for missile defense sensing requirements.
(B)
Current and planned overhead persistent infrared architecture and the potential for the future exploitability of such architecture.
(C)
Lessons learned from the space tracking and surveillance system and precision tracking space system technology development programs.
(D)
Opinions of private industry based on the experience of such industry with delivering space capabilities.
(E)
Opportunities for such successor system to contribute to nonmissile defense missions with unmet requirements, including space situational awareness.
(3)
Role of other departments— In conducting the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1), the Director shall compare the advantages and disadvantages, including in terms of costs, with respect to the Director—
(A)
developing a successor to the precision tracking space system solely for the Missile Defense Agency; and
(B)
cooperating with other heads of departments and agencies of the United States to develop space systems that are multi-mission, including by hosting payloads.
(b)
Submission required—
(1)
Terms of reference— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees the terms of reference of the analysis of alternatives performed under subsection (a)(1).
(2)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including—
(A)
the analysis of alternatives for a successor to the precision tracking space system performed under subsection (a)(1); and
(B)
a description of the potential platforms on which a hosted payload could be hosted.
(3)
Form— The report required by paragraph (2) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Conforming repeal— Section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1675) is repealed.

Sec. 236 Plan to improve organic kill assessment capability of the ground-based midcourse defense system

(a)
Organic kill assessment capability— The Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly develop—
(1)
options to achieve an organic kill assessment capability for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can be developed by not later than December 31, 2019, including by improving the command, control, battle management, and communications program and the sensor and communications architecture of the Agency; and
(2)
a plan to carry out such options that gives priority to including such capabilities in at least some of the 14 ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the Director, as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March 15, 2013.
(b)
Improved hit assessment— The Director and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly develop an interim capability for improved hit assessment for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can be integrated into near-term enhanced kill vehicle upgrades and refurbishment.
(c)
Submission to Congress— Not later than March 15, 2014, the Director and the Commander of the United States Northern Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on—
(1)
the development of an organic kill assessment capability under subsection (a), including the plan developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and
(2)
the development of an interim capability for improved hit assessment under subsection (b).

Sec. 237 Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, $15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for enhancing the capability for producing the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program in the United States, including for infrastructure, tooling, transferring data, special test equipment, and related components.

Sec. 238 NATO and the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe

(a)
NATO funding—
(1)
Phase I of EPAA— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall consult with the North Atlantic Council and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as “NATO”) on—
(A)
the funding of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe; and
(B)
establishing a plan for NATO to provide at least 50 percent of the infrastructure and operations and maintenance costs of phase I of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.
(2)
Phases II and III of EPAA— The President shall use the NATO Military Common-Funded Resources process to seek to fund at least 50 percent of the costs for phases II and III of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.
(3)
Reports— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period thereafter, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the funding provided by NATO pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b)
Interceptors— If the Secretary of Defense determines that it is useful to the interests of the United States, the Secretary shall seek to engage with members of NATO to establish a NATO common pool of Aegis standard missile–3 block IA, standard missile–3 block IB, and standard missile–3 block IIA interceptors to defend NATO members through the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe.

Sec. 239 Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a successful operational flight test of the Capability Enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred unless such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm line for the industrial base.

Sec. 240 Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
President Ronald Reagan in March 1983, in a speech from the oval office, laid the corner stone for a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles.
(2)
President Reagan stated, “I've become more and more deeply convinced that the human spirit must be capable of rising above dealing with other nations and human beings by threatening their existence * * * What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest upon the threat of instant United States retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of our allies?”.
(3)
The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as “Star Wars”, challenged the nation to accomplish the impossible by moving beyond the obvious possibilities of the day to set the United States and our allies up for success.
(4)
In 1999, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), National Missile Defense (NMD) prototype interceptor successfully demonstrated “hit-to-kill” technology intercepting a modified Minuteman intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM).
(5)
Congress passed the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–38) (signed by President Clinton), which stated, “It is the policy of the United States to deploy, as soon as is technologically possible, an effective National Missile Defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States against limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate)”.
(6)
On December 13, 2001, President George W. Bush announced “I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our government's ability to develop ways to protect our people from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks”.
(7)
Russian President Vladimir Putin said the move was “not a threat to the security of the Russian Federation”.
(8)
Since 2001, the United States has deployed considerable Missile Defense capability: 30 ground-based interceptors defending the continental U.S. today; 32 Aegis BMD ships; 113 SM–3 IA interceptors; 25 SM–3 IB interceptors; 3 THAAD batteries and 89 interceptors; and 8 AN/TPY–2 forward-based sensors.
(9)
The United States has partnerships with 22 nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), for missile defense cooperation. Likewise, India and South Korea are developing missile defenses and the Russian Federation and People’s Republic of China are also developing and improving missile defenses.
(10)
Since 2001 when they began development, United States missile defenses have had a test record of 58 of 73 hit-to-kill intercept attempts and have been successful across all programs of the integrated system, including Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD), Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), and PATRIOT Advanced Capability–3.
(11)
In July of 2004, the United States missile defense system was declared operational with limited capability. Since that time, it has offered defense against limited threats to the continental United States.
(12)
The United States has cooperatively developed with our Israeli allies a number of missile defense systems including Arrow, Arrow 3 and David’s Sling, systems which will protector our Israeli allies and contribute technology and expertise to United States systems.
(13)
The United States in support of NATO deployed a Patriot missile battery to defend the population and territory of Turkey and provide material support for Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty in the event of spillover from the Syrian civil war and has deployed Phase I of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, which includes a transportable x-band radar array and an on-station AEGIS ballistic missile defense ship armed with Standard Missile 3 block IA missile interceptors.
(14)
When United States territory, deployed forces and allies were threatened by North Korean ballistic missiles the United States had the operational capability and national will to deploy THAAD units to Guam to provide a defensive shield.
(15)
The United States continues to work jointly with Japan to improve the Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) which in addition to providing missile defense in the Pacific is also a keystone in the Phased Adaptive Approach for European missile defense.
(16)
On-going research and development under the auspices of the Missile Defense Agency will continue to expand the technology envelope to deploy a layered missile defense system capable of defending the homeland, our military forces deployed overseas, friendly nations and our allies against all ballistic missiles from launch and orbit to reentry.
(17)
A credible ballistic missile defense system is critical to the national defense of the United States.
(b)
Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
recognizes the inspiring leadership of President Ronald Reagan to “maintain the peace through strength”;
(2)
recognizes the enduring obligation President as Commander in Chief to“ preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution”;
(3)
commemorates the vision of President Reagan on the 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative;
(4)
believes that it is imperative that the United States continue fielding a robust missile defense system, including additional ground based interceptors; and
(5)
commits to supporting continued investments in future missile defense capabilities and emerging technologies such as directed energy and railguns.

Sec. 241 Readiness of intercontinental ballistic missile force

The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to—
(1)
remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the missile field; and
(2)
be made fully operational with a deployed missile.

Sec. 242 Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of the United States

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
On April 15, 2013, the National Security Advisor to the President, Tom Donilon, conveyed a personal letter from President Obama to the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin.
(2)
Press reports indicate that in this letter the President proposed, “developing a legally-binding agreement on transparency, which would include exchange of information to confirm that our programs do not pose a threat to each other’s deterrence forces,” through “a so-called executive agreement, for which [the President] does not need to seek the consent of Congress.”.
(3)
The Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergei Ryabkov, stated in response to the letter that, “the proposals of the U.S. side on the issue are quite concrete and are related in a certain way to the discussions our countries had at various levels in the past years. And it cannot be said from this point of view that the offers are decorative and not serious. No, I want to emphasize that we are committing to the seriousness of these proposals but we note their insufficiency.”.
(4)
Press reports indicate that the Secretary of the Russian Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, conveyed a response to the letter from President Putin.
(5)
President Obama’s proposed deal with Russian President Putin has been kept secret from Congress and the American people.
(6)
The Administration has systematically denied Congress information about past offers of United States missile defense concessions to Russia, including written requests from Members of the House of Representatives.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the President should promptly convey to Congress the details of any proposed deals with the Russian Federation concerning the missile defenses or nuclear arms of the United States; and
(2)
the missile defenses of the United States are central to the defense of the homeland from ballistic missile threats, particularly if nuclear deterrence fails, thus such defenses are not something that the President should continue to trade away for the prospects of nuclear arms reductions with Russia, the People’s Republic of China, or any other foreign country.

D Reports

Sec. 251 Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program

(a)
Annual GAO review— During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program.
(b)
Annual reports—
(1)
In general— Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program conducted under subsection (a).
(2)
Matters to be included— Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
The extent to which the program is meeting development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals.
(B)
With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for the amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results of—
(i)
developmental and operational testing of the vehicle; and
(ii)
plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety.
(C)
An assessment of procurement plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier performance.
(D)
An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such strategy is in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense.
(E)
An assessment of the projected operations and support costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford to operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle.
(3)
Additional information— In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of—
(A)
the analysis of alternatives;
(B)
the initial capabilities document; and
(C)
the capabilities development document.

Sec. 252 Report on strategy to improve body armor

(a)
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the comprehensive research and development strategy of the Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of body armor.
(b)
Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A brief description of each solution for body armor weight reduction that is being developed as of the date of the report.
(2)
For each such solution—
(A)
the costs, schedules, and performance requirements;
(B)
the research and development funding profile;
(C)
a description of the materials being used in the solution; and
(D)
the feasibility and technology readiness levels of the solution and the materials.
(3)
A strategy to provide resources for future research and development of body armor weight reduction.
(4)
An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight reduction.
(5)
A description of how the Secretary coordinates the research and development of body armor weight reduction being carried out by the military departments.
(6)
Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate.

Sec. 253 Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency initiative

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the investment strategy to accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the current engine and transmission of the M1 Abrams series main battle tank as part of the Army’s Engineering Change Proposal Phase I strategy.

Sec. 254 Report on powered rail system

(a)
Report required— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the powered rail system compared to currently fielded solutions. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1)
Verification of relevant studies previously conducted by the Army, including that of the Maneuver Center of Excellence, which show that a typical infantry platoon requires approximately 430 pounds of batteries for a 72-hour mission, or roughly 10 pounds per soldier, and that the per-soldier, per-year procurement, storage, transport and disposal costs of these batteries are between $50,000 and $65,000.
(2)
An assessment of the comparative total cost of ownership, including procurement, fielding, training, and sustainment of the existing rail system and associated rail-mounted devices with respect to battery types and usage, when compared to that of a powered rail or intelligent rail system with a consolidated power source.
(3)
An assessment of the specific effects of excessive battery weight on soldier mobility, endurance and lethality determined through side-by-side time, endurance, motion and lethality tests between soldiers operating with existing rail-mounted weapon accessories and soldiers using the powered rail or intelligent rail solution.
(4)
An assessment of the advantages to the Army of incorporating the high-speed communications capability embedded in the powered rail or intelligent rail technology, including the integration of existing Army devices and devices in development such as the family of weapons sights and the enhanced night vision goggles, with the powered rail technology, and the connection of these previously unconnected devices to the soldier network.
(b)
Testing— Any testing conducted in order to produce the report required by subsection (a) shall be supervised and validated by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of Defense.

Sec. 255 Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship program

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that assesses whether the Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or related scholarship or fellowship programs within the Department of Defense, are providing the necessary number of undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of science, technology, engineer, and mathematics to meet the recommendations contained in the report of the Commission on Research and Development in the United States Intelligence Community, as well as recommendation for how SMART and similar program might be improved to better satisfy those recommendations.

E Other Matters

Sec. 261 Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board

(a)
In general— Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board

“(a) Establishment—There shall be in the Department of Defense a Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board (in this section referred to as the “Board”) to review and assess the cryptographic modernization activities of the Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities pursuant to the roles and responsibilities outlined in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 6510.02D.

“(b) Members

“(1) The Secretary shall determine the number of members of the Board.

“(2) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board.

“(c) Responsibilities—The Board shall—

“(1) review compliance with cease-use dates for specific cryptographic systems based on rigorous analysis of technical and threat factors and issue guidance, as needed, to relevant program executive offices and program managers;

“(2) monitor the overall cryptographic modernization efforts of the Department, including while such efforts are being executed;

“(3) convene in-depth technical program reviews, as needed, for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating current and in-draft requirements of systems of the Department of Defense and identifying programmatic risks;

“(4) develop a five-year cryptographic modernization plan to—

“(A) make recommendations to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council with respect to updating or modifying requirements for cryptographic modernization; and

“(B) identify previously unidentified requirements;

“(5) develop a long-term roadmap to—

“(A) ensure synchronization with major planning documents;

“(B) anticipate risks and issues in 10- and 20-year timelines; and

“(C) ensure that the expertise and insights of the military departments, Defense Agencies, the combatant commands, industry, academia, and key allies are included in the course of developing and carrying out cryptographic modernization activities;

“(6) develop a concept of operations for how cryptographic systems should function in a system-of-systems environment; and

“(7) advise the Secretary on the development of a cryptographic asset visibility system.

“(d) Exclusion of certain programs—The Board shall not include programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 188 the following new item:

Sec. 262 Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research

Subparagraph (A) of section 257(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended to read as follows:

“(A) the State is eligible for the experimental program to stimulate competitive research under section 113 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 1862g); and”

Sec. 263 Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions

(a)
Clarification of availability of funds— Section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Availability of funds for infrastructure revitalization projects

“(1) In general—Subject to the provisions of this subsection, funds available under a mechanism under subsection (a) for specific laboratory infrastructure revitalization projects shall be available for such projects until expended.

“(2) Prior notice of costs of projects—Funds shall be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project referred to in that paragraph only if the congressional defense committees are notified of the total cost of the project before the commencement of the project.

“(3) Accumulation of funds for projects—Funds may accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five years.

“(4) Limitation on total cost of project—Funds shall be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project referred to in that paragraph only if the cost of the project does not exceed $4,000,000.”

(b)
Extension— Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, is amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.
(c)
Application— Subsection (b) of section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as added by subsection (a)(2), shall apply with respect to funds made available under such section 219 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 264 Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements

Section 2374a(f) of chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2013” and inserting “September 30, 2018”.

Sec. 265 Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems

Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking “October 1, 2015” and inserting “October 1, 2020”.

Sec. 266 Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university affiliated research centers

(a)
Briefing— Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on power and energy research conducted at the university affiliated research centers.
(b)
Matters included— The briefing under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of current and planned research on power grid issues conducted with other university-based energy centers.
(2)
A description of current and planned collaboration efforts regarding power grid issues with university-based research centers that have an expertise in energy efficiency and renewable energy, including efforts with respect to—
(A)
system failure and losses, including—
(i)
utility logistics and supply chain management for events resulting in system failure or other major damage;
(ii)
near real-time utility and law enforcement access to damage assessment information during events resulting in system failure or other major damage;
(B)
mitigation and response to disasters and attacks;
(C)
variable energy resource integration on the bulk power system;
(D)
integration of high penetrations of distributed energy technologies on the electric distribution system;
(E)
substation and asset hardening techniques appropriate for use in civilian areas;
(F)
facilitating development of training programs to support significant increase in required technical skills of present and future utility field forces, including hands-on training; and
(G)
facilitating increased consumer self-sufficiency.

Sec. 267 Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and evaluation land

(a)
In general— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense, or the head of any other department or agency of the Federal Government, may not finalize any decision regarding new land use activity on covered land unless the Secretary concerned approves such activity in writing.
(b)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “covered land” means ranges, test areas, or other land in the contiguous United States used by the Secretary of Defense for activities related to research, development, test, and evaluation that the Secretary determines, for purposes of this section, to be critical to national security.
(2)
The term “new land use activity” means an activity regarding the use of covered land that—
(A)
as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is not carried out on covered land; and
(B)
is carried out by, or in cooperation with, a department or agency of the Federal Government other than the Department of Defense.
(3)
The term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 268 Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that—
(1)
describes how the Department of Defense intends to maintain the capability and infrastructure required to support canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors;
(2)
specifies the appropriate office to oversee the acquisition process, research and development, technology advancement, testing and evaluation, and production and procurement with respect to canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors;
(3)
specifies the plan to sustain and enhance the partnerships and relationships of the Department of Defense with service laboratories, private sector companies, and academic institutions to ensure that the latest data and information regarding canine capabilities are distributed throughout the Department and other Federal agencies that could benefit from such information; and
(4)
specifies any technologies capable of replacing the canine as a stand-off detection capability during the next 2 years.

III Operation and Maintenance

A Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 301 Operation and maintenance funding

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.

Sec. 302 Authorization of appropriations for Marine Security Guard

(a)
Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for Marine Security Guard is hereby increased by $13,400,000.
(b)
Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, is hereby reduced by $13,400,000, to be derived from the Maneuver Units.

Sec. 303 Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force

(a)
Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Crisis Response Force is hereby increased by $10,600,000.
(b)
Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, is hereby reduced by $10,600,000, to be derived from the Maneuver Units.

B Energy and Environment

Sec. 311 Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy

Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (4), by striking “Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for that fiscal year” and inserting “The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for a fiscal year”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal year shall be submitted by the later of the following dates:

“(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31.

“(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.”

Sec. 312 Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities

(a)
Use of funds under certain agreements— Section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) and (j); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h):

“(h) Interagency cooperation in conservation programs To avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities—In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect both the environment and military readiness, the recipient of funds provided pursuant an agreement under this section or under the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and waters within the scope of the agreement, use such funds to satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation program of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of the Interior notwithstanding any limitation of such program on the source of matching or cost-sharing funds.”

(b)
Sunset— This section and subsection (h) of section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section, shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any agreement referred to in such subsection that is entered into on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

Sec. 313 Reauthorization of Sikes Act

Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by striking “fiscal years 2009 through 2014” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal years 2014 through 2019”.

Sec. 314 Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to Department of Defense readiness activities

(a)
Multiyear agreements To fund long-Term management— Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(1)” before “Funds”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under subsection (a)(2), funds referred to in paragraph (1)—

“(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of the natural resource maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the agreement; and

“(B) may be invested by the recipient in accordance with the recipient’s own guidelines for the management and investment of financial assets, and any interest or income derived from such investment may be applied for the same purposes as the principal.”

(b)
Availability of funds and relation to other laws— Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(c) Availability of funds and relation to other laws

“(1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject to the availability of funds.

“(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.

“(3) Amounts available to the Department of Defense that are provided to any Federal, State, local, or nongovernmental entity for conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources in an area that is not on a military installation—

“(A) may only be used for payment of direct costs associated with the management of such area; and

“(B) may be used to pay not more than 3 percent of total project administrative costs, fees, and management charges.

“(4) Amounts available to the Department of Defense may not be used under this Act to acquire fee title interest in real property for natural resources projects that are not on a military installation.”

(c)
Annual audits— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) Annual audits—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall annually audit each natural resources project funded with amounts available to the Department of Defense under this Act that is not on a military installation.”

(d)
Sunset— This section and the provisions of law enacted by the amendments made by this section shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any cooperative agreement referred to in such provisions that is entered into on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired.

Sec. 315 Exclusions from definition of “chemical substance” under Toxic Substances Control Act

Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking “, and” and inserting ‘‘and any component of such an article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers), and’’.

Sec. 316 Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement

Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by adding at the end the following: “This section shall not apply to the Department of Defense.”.

Sec. 317 Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits

For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruction 4715.19, issued as required by section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or any successor instruction, the term “covered waste” specifically includes, in addition to the materials already specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2) of such section, the following:
(1)
Tires.
(2)
Treated wood.
(3)
Batteries.
(4)
Plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover plastic materials from the solid waste stream.
(5)
Munitions and explosives, the destruction of which is covered in Department of Defense Instruction 6055.09–M (Reference (i)).
(6)
Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves removed.
(7)
Fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its contents.
(8)
Aerosol cans.
(9)
Polychlorinated biphenyls.
(10)
Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than waste fuel for initial combustion).
(11)
Asbestos.
(12)
Mercury.
(13)
Foam tent material.
(14)
Any item containing any of the materials referred to in a preceding paragraph.

Sec. 318 Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by law.

Sec. 319 Limitation on procurement of biofuels

(a)
In general— Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the following dates:
(1)
The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department.
(2)
The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), and the sequestration in effect by reason of such Act, are no longer in effect.
(b)
Exceptions— The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to biofuels purchased—
(1)
in limited quantities necessary to complete test and certification; or
(2)
for the biofuel research and development efforts of the Department.

Sec. 320 Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation

(a)
Establishment of the southern sea otter military readiness areas— Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas

“(a) Establishment—The Secretary of Defense shall establish areas to be known as “Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas” for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following:

“(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates:

“(2) That area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide line designated by 33 CFR part 165 on May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.

“(b) Activities within the southern sea otter military readiness areas

“(1) Incidental takings under Endangered Species Act of 1973—Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

“(2) Incidental takings under Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972—Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting military readiness activities.

“(3) Treatment as species proposed to be listed—For purposes of any military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533).

“(c) Removal—Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas as of the effective date of this section or thereafter be removed from the Areas.

“(d) Revision or termination of exceptions—The Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that military activities authorized under subsection (b) are impeding southern sea otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population levels.

“(e) Monitoring

“(1) In general—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness activities on the growth or decline of the sea otter population and on the near-shore eco-system. Monitoring and research parameters and methods shall be determined in consultation with the service.

“(2) Reports—Within 24 months after the effective date of this section and every three years thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).

“(f) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Incidental taking—The term “incidental taking” means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.

“(2) Optimum sustainable population—The term “optimum sustainable population” means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.

“(3) Southern sea otter—The term “southern sea otter” means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.

“(4) Take—The term “take”—

“(A) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531–1544) shall have the meaning given such term in that statute; and

“(B) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361–1423h), shall have the meaning given such term in that statute.

“(5) Military readiness activity—The term “military readiness activity” has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2509; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), and includes all training and operations of the Armed Forces that relate to combat, and the adequate and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:
(c)
Conforming Amendment— Section 1 of Public Law 99–625 (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.

C Logistics and Sustainment

Sec. 321 Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan

(a)
In general— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the Comptroller General of the United States a strategic sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan shall include each of the following:
(1)
An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing the plan.
(2)
An identification of the requirements and planning for the long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and its mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1482).
(3)
A description of the current and future operating environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or referred to in strategic guidance and planning documents of the Department of Defense.
(4)
The facility, supply, and logistics systems requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship when forward deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel required to conduct the necessary maintenance activities.
(5)
Any required updates to host-nation agreements to facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and delivery of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent repair.
(6)
An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-deployed, including requirements for multiple ships and variants.
(7)
An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of fly away teams required to support forward-deployed maintenance requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in Singapore, and estimates for follow-on deployments of Littoral Combat Ships of both variants.
(8)
A detailed description of the continuity of operations plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans to increase the number of Squadron personnel.
(9)
An identification of mission critical single point of failure equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral Combat Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts locations and levels.
(b)
Form— The plan required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified annex.

Sec. 322 Review of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army arsenals

(a)
Review— The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the directors of the Defense Agencies, shall conduct a review of the current and expected manufacturing requirements across the Department of Defense to identify critical manufacturing competencies, supplies, components, end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which no or a limited domestic commercial source exists. In conducting the review under this section, the Secretary—
(1)
shall assess which of the competencies for which no or a limited domestic commercial source exists could be executed by an arsenal owned by the United States; and
(2)
may review other manufacturing capabilities, as the Secretary determines appropriate, to determine if such capabilities could be executed by an arsenal owned by the United States.
(b)
Congressional briefing— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

Sec. 323 Inclusion of Army arsenals capabilities in solicitations

(a)
Determination of use of arsenals—
(1)
Solicitation of information— When undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall solicit information from an arsenal owned by the United States regarding the capability of the arsenal to fulfill a manufacturing requirement.
(2)
Submittal of material solution— Upon a determination, that an arsenal owned by the United States is capable of fulfilling a manufacturing requirement, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager shall allow the arsenal to submit a material solution in response to the requirement.
(b)
Notification of solicitations— When issuing a solicitation, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager shall notify each arsenal owned by the United States of any manufacturing requirement that the arsenal has the capability to fulfill and allow the arsenal to submit a proposal in response to the requirement.

Sec. 324 Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of certain functions to contractor performance

No Department of Defense function that is performed by Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a certain military base may be converted to performance by a contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act) and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act) that are located in the geographic area near the military base.

D Reports

Sec. 331 Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness

(a)
Assessment of assigned missions and contractor support— Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (j); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsections:

“(g) Combatant command assigned mission assessments

“(1) Each report shall also include an assessment by each commander of a geographic or functional combatant command of the ability of the command to successfully execute each of the assigned missions of the command. Each such assessment for a combatant command shall also include a list of the mission essential tasks for each assigned mission of the command and an assessment of the ability of the command to successfully complete each task within prescribed timeframes.

“(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term “assigned mission” means any contingency response program plan, theater campaign plan, or named operation that is approved and assigned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“(h) Risk assessment of dependence on contractor support—Each report shall also include an assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk incurred by using contract support in contingency operations as required under Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, “Policies and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix”.

“(i) Combat support agencies assessment

“(1) Each report shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the military readiness of the combat support agencies, including, for each such agency—

“(A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness and readiness of the agency to support operating forces in the event of a war or threat to national security, including—

“(i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment of the ability of the agency to successfully perform those tasks;

“(ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency to accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) affects the ability of the military departments and the unified and geographic combatant commands to execute operations and contingency plans by number;

“(iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended to address such deficiencies; and

“(iv) key indicators and other relevant information related to any deficiency or other problem identified;

“(B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers appropriate.

“(2) In this subsection, the term “combat support agency” means any of the following Defense Agencies:

“(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency.

“(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency.

“(C) The Defense Logistics Agency.

“(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only with respect to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense).

“(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency.

“(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

“(G) The National Reconnaissance Office.

“(H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense) and Central Security Service.

“(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat support agency by the Secretary of Defense.”

(b)
Conforming amendment— Such section is further amended in subsection (a), by striking “and (f)” and inserting “(f), (g), (h), and (i)”.

Sec. 332 Repeal of annual Comptroller General report on Army progress

Section 323 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2146; 10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (d);
(2)
by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and
(3)
in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking “or (d)”.

Sec. 333 Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets

Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) is amended by striking “in excess of $30,000,000” and all that follows and inserting “(as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the future-years defense program for which the budget is submitted (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly related to the assets definition, design, development, deployment, sustainment, and disposal.”.

Sec. 334 Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico

(a)
Identification of military munitions and navy operational history—
(1)
Records review— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of all existing Department of Defense records to determine and describe the historical use of military munitions and military training on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The review shall, to the extent practicable and based on historical documents available, identify the type of munitions, the quantity of munitions, and the location where such munitions may have potentially been used or may be remaining on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays or waters. The historical review shall also determine the type of various military training exercises that occurred on each island and in the nearby cays and waters.
(2)
Cooperation and consultation— The Secretary of Defense may request the assistance of other Federal agencies and may consult the Governor of Puerto Rico as may be deemed appropriate in conducting the review required by this subsection and in preparing the report required by subsection (b).
(b)
Report— Not later than 450 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and shall make publicly available, a report detailing the findings and determinations of the review required by subsection (a). The report shall be organized to include the information detailed in subsection (a) in addition to site history, site description, real estate ownership information, and any other information about known military munitions and military training that occurred historically on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The report shall include any information and recommendations that the Secretary deems appropriate about the potential hazards to the public associated with unexploded ordnance on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters.
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “military munitions” has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
The term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.

E Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Sec. 341 Limitation on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores

The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, relative to the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013, until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense concludes the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary on January 25, 2013, and briefs the congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment. Such briefing shall include a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in supporting the United Stated overseas force posture.

Sec. 342 Prohibition on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration teams outside the United States

(a)
Prohibition— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 may be used for the performance of flight demonstration teams under the jurisdiction of the Secretary at any location outside the United States.
(b)
United States— In this section, the term “United States” means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States.

F Other Matters

Sec. 351 Requirement to establish policy on joint combat uniforms

(a)
Establishment of policy— It is the policy of the United States that by not later than October 1, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall require all military services to use a joint combat camouflage uniform, including color and pattern variants designed for specific combat environments.
(b)
Prohibition— Except as provided in subsection (c), each military service shall be prohibited from adopting a new combat camouflage uniform, unless—
(1)
the combat camouflage utility uniform will be a joint uniform adopted by all military services; or
(2)
the military services adopt a uniform currently in use by another military service.
(c)
Exceptions— Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed as—
(1)
prohibiting the development or fielding of combat and camouflage utility uniforms for use by personnel assigned to or operating in support of the unified combatant command for special operations forces described in section 167 of title 10, United States Code;
(2)
prohibiting the military services from fielding ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, or other such items as determined by the Secretaries of the military departments; or
(3)
prohibiting the military services from issuing working or vehicle crew uniforms.
(d)
Guidance required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement this section. At a minimum, such guidance shall—
(1)
require the Secretaries of the military departments to collaborate on the development of joint criteria for the design, development, fielding, and characteristics of combat camouflage uniforms;
(2)
require the Secretaries of the military departments to ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms meet the geographic and operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands; and
(3)
require the Secretaries of the military departments to ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility uniforms achieve interoperability with other components of individual war fighter systems, including organizational clothing and individual equipment such as body armor and other individual protective systems.
(e)
Waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in subsection (b) if the Secretary certifies to Congress that there are exceptional operational circumstances that require the development or fielding of a new combat camouflage uniform.
(f)
Repeal of policy— Section 352 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84, 123 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is hereby repealed.

IV Military Personnel Authorizations

A Active Forces

Sec. 401 End strengths for active forces

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1)
The Army, 520,000.
(2)
The Navy, 323,600.
(3)
The Marine Corps, 190,200.
(4)
The Air Force, 327,600.

Sec. 402 Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels

Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:

“(1) For the Army, 520,000.

“(2) For the Navy, 323,600.

“(3) For the Marine Corps, 190,200.

“(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.”

B Reserve Forces

Sec. 411 End strengths for Selected Reserve

(a)
In general— The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2014, as follows:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 205,000.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 59,100.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 70,400.
(7)
The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000.
(b)
End strength reductions— The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(1)
the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
(2)
the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.
(c)
End strength increases— Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

Sec. 412 End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 10,159.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 2,911.

Sec. 413 End strengths for military technicians (dual status)

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(1)
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210.
(2)
For the Army Reserve, 8,395.
(3)
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,875.
(4)
For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429.

Sec. 414 Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians

(a)
Limitations—
(1)
National guard— Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the following:
(A)
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600.
(B)
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
(2)
Army reserve— The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 595.
(3)
Air force reserve— The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 90.
(b)
Non-dual status technicians defined— In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 415 Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support

During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(1)
The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
(2)
The Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3)
The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4)
The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5)
The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
(6)
The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

C Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 421 Military personnel

(a)
Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
(b)
Construction of authorization— The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2014.

V Military Personnel Policy

A Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Sec. 501 Limitations on number of general and flag officers on active duty

(a)
Per-service limitations; limited joint duty exclusions— Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 502 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1387) and section 501(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1714), is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “231” and inserting “226”
(B)
in paragraph (2), by striking “162” and inserting “157”; and
(C)
in paragraph (3), by striking “198” and inserting “193”; and
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “310” and inserting “300”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “85” and inserting “81”;
(ii)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “61” and inserting “59”;
(iii)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “73” and inserting “70”; and
(iv)
in subparagraph (D), by striking “21” and inserting “20”.
(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2014.

B Reserve Component Management

Sec. 511 Minimum notification requirements for members of reserve components before deployment or cancellation of deployment related to a contingency operation

Section 12301 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (e), by striking “The period” and inserting “Subject to subsection (i), the period”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(i)

“(1) The Secretary concerned shall provide not less than 120 days advance notice to a unit of the reserve components that—

“(A) will be ordered to active duty for deployment in connection with a contingency operation; or

“(B) having been notified of such a deployment, has such deployment canceled, postponed, or otherwise altered.

“(2) If a member of the reserve components is not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit or is to be ordered to active duty apart from the member’s unit, the required notice under paragraph (1) shall be provided directly to the member.

“(3) If the Secretary concerned fails to provide timely notification as required by paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary concerned shall submit, within 30 days after the date of the failure, written notification to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate explaining the reason for the failure and the units and members of the reserve components affected.”

Sec. 512 Information to be provided to boards considering officers for selective early removal from reserve active-status list

(a)
Officers to be considered; exclusions— Section 14704(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(1)” before “Whenever” ;
(2)
by striking “all officers on that list” and inserting “officers on the reserve active-status list”;
(3)
by striking “the reserve active-status list, in the number specified by the Secretary by each grade and competitive category.” and inserting “that list.”; and
(4)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of officers in a reserve component whose names are submitted to a board under paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the reserve active-status list for that reserve component in the same grade and competitive category whose position on the reserve active-status list is between—

“(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board; and

“(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board.

“(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may not include an officer who—

“(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or

“(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of law during the fiscal year in which the board is convened or during the following fiscal year.”

(b)
Specification of number of officers who may be recommended for removal— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection:

“(b) Specification of number of officers who may be recommended for separation—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify the number of officers described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for separation under subsection (c).”

Sec. 513 Temporary authority to maintain active status and inactive status lists of members in the inactive National Guard

(a)
Authority to maintain active and inactive status lists in the inactive national guard—
(1)
Active and inactive status lists authorized— The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may maintain an active status list and an inactive status list of members in the inactive Army National Guard and the inactive Air National Guard, respectively.
(2)
Total number on all lists at one time— The total number of members of the Army National Guard and members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists and the inactive status lists assigned to the inactive National Guard may not exceed a total of 10,000 at any time.
(3)
Total number on active status lists at one time— The total number of members of the Army National Guard and members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists of the inactive National Guard may not exceed 4,000 at any time.
(4)
Condition of implementation— Before the authority provided by this subsection is used to establish an active status list and an inactive status list of members in the inactive Army National Guard or the inactive Air National Guard, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a copy of the implementation guidance to be used to execute this authority.
(b)
Additional enlisted member transfer authority— In addition to the transfer authority provided by section 303(b) of title 32, United States Code, while an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists—
(1)
an enlisted member of the active Army National Guard may be transferred to the inactive Army National Guard without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the inactive Army National Guard; and
(2)
an enlisted member of the active Air National Guard may be transferred to the inactive Air National Guard without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the inactive Air National Guard.
(c)
Removal of restrictions on transfer of officers— While an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists, nothing in chapter 3 of title 32, United States Code, shall be construed to prevent any of the following:
(1)
An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National Guard from being transferred from the active Army National Guard to the inactive Army National Guard.
(2)
An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air National Guard from being transferred from the active Air National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard.
(3)
An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to the inactive Army National Guard from being transferred from the inactive Army National Guard to the active Army National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
(4)
An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the inactive Air National Guard from being transferred from the inactive Air National Guard to the active Air National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit.
(d)
Status and training categories for members in inactive status— While an inactive status list for the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists—
(1)
the first sentence of subsection (b) of section 10141 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply only with respect to members of the reserve components assigned to the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard who are assigned to such inactive status list; and
(2)
the exclusion of the Army National Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the United States under the first sentence of subsection (c) of such section shall not apply.
(e)
Eligibility for inactive-duty training pay— While an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists, the limitation on pay for inactive-duty training contained in section 206(c) of title 37, United States Code, shall apply only to persons assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National Guard, rather than to all persons enlisted in the inactive National Guard.
(f)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
Modification of active status definition— Section 101(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “However, while an inactive status list for the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists, such term means the status of a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the United States who is not assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard, on another inactive status list, or in the Retired Reserve.”.
(2)
Computation of years of service for entitlement to retired pay— Paragraph (3) of section 12732(b) of such title is amended to read as follows:

“(3) Service in the inactive National Guard (for any period other than a period in which an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists) and service while assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National Guard (for any period in which an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists).”

(g)
Evaluation of use of authority—
(1)
Independent study required— Before the end of the period specified in subsection (h), the Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent study to evaluate the effectiveness of using an active status list for the inactive National Guard to improve the readiness of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard.
(2)
Elements— As part of the study required by this subsection, the entity conducting the study shall determine, for each year in which the temporary authority provided by subsection (a) is used—
(A)
how many members of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard were transferred to the active status list of the inactive National Guard;
(B)
how many of these vacancies were filled with personnel new to the Army National Guard;
(C)
the additional cost of filling these positions; and
(D)
the impact on drill and annual training participation rates.
(3)
Additional consideration— The study required by this subsection also shall include an assessment of the impact of the use of the temporary authority provided by subsection (a) on medical readiness category 3B personnel transferred to the active status inactive National Guard, including—
(A)
how long it took them to complete the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process; and
(B)
how satisfied they were with their unit’s management and collaboration during the IDES process.
(4)
Submission of results— Not later than 180 days after completion of the study required by this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report containing the results of the study.
(h)
Duration of authority— The authority provided by subsection (a) for the maintenance of both an active status list and inactive status list of members in the inactive National Guard exists only during the period beginning on October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2018.

Sec. 514 Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general and flag officers in an active status

(a)
Review required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the general officer and flag officer requirements for members of the reserve component in an active status.
(b)
Purpose of review— The purpose of the review is to ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section 12004 of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general officers and reserve flag officers in an active status—
(1)
are based on an objective requirements process and are sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and administration of the reserve components;
(2)
provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve component general and flag officers can continue to be assigned on active duty in joint duty and in-service military positions;
(3)
reflect a review of the appropriateness and number of exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 12004 of title 10, United States Code;
(4)
reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or flag officer positions, including through the conversion of certain reserve component general or flag officer positions to senior civilian positions; and
(5)
are subjected to periodic review, control, and adjustment.
(c)
Report— Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review, including such recommendations for changes in law and policy related to authorized reserve general and flag officers strengths as the Secretary considers to be appropriate.

Sec. 515 Feasability study on establishing a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

(a)
Study required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing—
(1)
a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; and
(2)
a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(b)
Force structure elements of study— In conducting the study required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following:
(1)
The allocation of National Guard force structure and manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the impact of this allocation on existing National Guard units in the 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the District of Columbia.
(2)
The Federal funding that would be required to support pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment, including maintenance, required to support such force structure.
(3)
The presence of existing infrastructure to support a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the requirement for additional infrastructure, including information technology infrastructure, to support such force structure, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1).
(4)
How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would accommodate the National Guard Bureau’s “Essential Ten” homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering, civil support teams, security, medical, transportation, maintenance, logistics, joint force headquarters, and communications) and reflect regional needs.
(5)
The manpower cadre, both military personnel and full-time support, including National Guard technicians, required to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to support demographically a unit of the National Guard at each location.
(6)
The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges associated with transportation, communications, supply/resupply, and training operations and missions.
(c)
Submission of results— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall also include the following:
(1)
A determination of whether the executive branch of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for establishing a unit of the National Guard, and a description of any other steps that such executive branches must take to request and carry out the establishment of a National Guard unit.
(2)
A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37, United States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(3)
A description of any required Department of Defense actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(4)
A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and actions described in the preceding paragraphs.

Sec. 516 Designation of State student cadet corps as Department of Defense youth organizations

Section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraph (14) as paragraph (15); and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new paragraph (14):

“(14) Any State student cadet corps authorized under State law.”

C General Service Authorities

Sec. 521 Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System

(a)
Review— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of—
(1)
the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System with respect to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of addressing the matters specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); and
(2)
the improvements to the Integrated Disability Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
(b)
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the review under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following:
(1)
With respect to the reserve components of the Armed Forces—
(A)
the number of pending cases that exist as of the date of the report, listed by military department, component, and, with respect to the National Guard, State;
(B)
as of the date of the report, the average time it takes to process a case in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System;
(C)
a description of the steps the Secretary will take to resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; and
(D)
the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve such backlog for each military department.
(2)
With respect to the regular components and reserve components of the Armed Forces—
(A)
a description of the progress being made to transition the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format that a member of the Armed Forces may access and see the status of the member during each phase of the system;
(B)
an estimate of the cost to complete the transition to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; and
(C)
an assessment of the feasibility of improving in-transit visibility of pending cases, including by establishing a method of tracking a pending case when a military treatment facility is assigned a packet and pending case for action regarding a member.
(c)
Pending case defined— In this section, the term pending case means a case involving a member of the Armed Forces who, as of the date of the review under subsection (a), is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System and has been referred to a medical evaluation board.

Sec. 522 Compliance requirements for organizational climate assessments

(a)
Verification and tracking requirements— The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretaries of the military departments to verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments required as part of the comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1753).
(b)
Implementation— No later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing—
(1)
a description of the progress of the development of the system that will verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments; and
(2)
an estimate of when the system will be completed and implemented.

Sec. 523 Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside the United States

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that there is continuous, designated military command responsibility and accountability for the care, handling, and transportation of the remains of each deceased member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who died outside the United States, beginning with the initial recovery of the remains, through the defense mortuary system, until the interment of the remains or the remains are otherwise accepted by the person designated as provided by section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, to direct disposition of the remains.

Sec. 524 Contents of Transition Assistance Program

(a)
In general— Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(9) Provide information about disability-related employment and education protections.”

(2)
by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
(3)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Additional elements of program—The mandatory program carried out by this section shall include—

“(1) for any such member who plans to use the member’s entitlement to educational assistance under title 38—

“(A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such entitlement; and

“(B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible with the member’s education goals, and instruction on how to finance the member’s post-secondary education; and

“(2) instruction in the benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects determined by the Secretary concerned.”

(b)
Deadline for implementation— The program carried out under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall comply with the requirements of subsections (b)(9) and (c) of such section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April 1, 2015.
(c)
Feasibility study— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the results of a study carried out by the Secretary to determine the feasibility of providing the instruction described in subsection (b) of section 1142 of title 10, United States Code, at all overseas locations where such instruction is provided by entering into a contract jointly with the Secretary of Labor for the provision of such instruction.

Sec. 525 Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records

(a)
Availability of Judicial review; limitations—
(1)
In general— Chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to correction of military records

“(a) Availability of judicial review

“(1) In general—Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5 any person adversely affected by a records correction final decision may obtain judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction to hear the matter.

“(2) Records correction final decision defined—In this section, the term “records correction final decision” means any of the following decisions:

“(A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1552 of this title.

“(B) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1034(f) of this title.

“(C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title.

“(b) Exhaustion of administrative remedies

“(1) General rule—Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to correction under a provision of law specified in subsection (a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other provision of law unless—

“(A) the petitioner has requested a correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title); and

“(B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision denying that correction in whole or in part.

“(2) Whistleblower cases—When the final decision of the Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g) of this title, the petitioner is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial review, but if the petitioner does seek such review, judicial review may not be sought until the earlier of the following occurs:

“(A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the matter.

“(B) The period specified in section 1034(g) of this title for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires.

“(3) Class actions—If judicial review of a records correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title) and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case, paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to any matter covered by a claim for which the class is certified.

“(4) Timeliness—Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on which the petitioner requests a correction.

“(c) Statutes of limitation

“(1) Six years from final decision—A records correction final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2) applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court not later than six years after the date of the records correction final decision.

“(2) Six years for certain claims that may result in payment of money

“(A) In a case of a records correction final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records correction final decision (or the portion of such decision described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court before the end of the six-year period that began on the date of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death while on active duty, of the person whose military records are the subject of the correction request. Such six-year period does not include any time between the date of the filing of the request for correction of military records leading to the records correction final decision and the date of the final decision.

“(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction final decision or portion of the decision that involves a denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the court, would support, or result in, the payment of money, other than payments made under chapter 73 of this title, either under a court order or under a subsequent administrative determination.

“(d) Habeas corpus—This section does not affect any cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
Effect of denial of request for correction of records when prohibited personnel action alleged—
(1)
Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review— Subsection (f) of section 1034 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(7) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the member or former member—

“(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and

“(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.”

(2)
Secretary of defense review; notice of denial— Subsection (g) of such section is amended—
(A)
by inserting “(1)” before “Upon the completion of all”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the member or former member—

“(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and

“(B) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.”

(3)
Sole basis for judicial review— Such section is further amended—
(A)
by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) and (j), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h):

“(h) Judicial review

“(1) A decision of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.

“(2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (g) was not sought, a decision of the Secretary of a military department under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.

“(3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.”

(c)
Effect of denial of other requests for correction of military records— Section 1552 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(h) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall provide the claimant—

“(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and

“(2) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.

“(i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.”

(d)
Effective date and application—
(1)
In general— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2015, and shall apply to all final decisions of the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g) of title 10, United States Code, and of the Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security under sections 1034(f) or 1552 of such title rendered on or after such date.
(2)
Treatment of existing cases— This section and the amendments made by this section do not affect the authority of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was properly before the court before the effective date specified in paragraph (1).
(e)
Implementation— The Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security (in the case of the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy) may prescribe regulations, and interim guidance before prescribing such regulations, to implement the amendments made by this section. Regulations or interim guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military department may not take effect until approved by the Secretary of Defense.

Sec. 526 Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators

(a)
Establishment of definitions— Section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Gender-neutral occupational standard—The term “gender-neutral occupational standard”, with respect to a military career designator, means that all members of the Armed Forces serving in or assigned to the military career designator must meet the same physical and performance outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned to the military career designator.

“(2) Military career designator—The term “military career designator” refers to—

“(A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties, specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted classification codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification identifiers; and

“(B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of concentration, occupational specialties, specialty codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification identifiers.”

(b)
Use of definitions— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “military occupational career field” and inserting “military career designator”; and
(B)
in paragraph (1), by striking “common, relevant performance standards” and inserting “an occupational standard”;
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “any military occupational specialty” and inserting “any military career designator”; and
(ii)
by striking “requirements for members in that specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational specialty” and inserting “requirements as part of the gender-neutral occupational standard for members in that career designator and shall ensure (in the case of a career designator”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
by striking “an occupational specialty” and inserting “a military career designator”;
(ii)
by striking “that occupational specialty” and inserting “that military career designator”; and
(iii)
by striking “that specialty” and inserting “that military career designator”; and
(3)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking “the occupational standards for a military occupational field” and inserting “the gender-neutral occupational standard for a military career designator”; and
(B)
by striking “that occupational field” and inserting “that military career designator”.

Sec. 527 Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions

(a)
Expansion of prohibited retaliatory personnel actions— Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)(B)—
(A)
by striking “or” at the end of clause (iv);
(B)
by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); and
(C)
by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause (v):

“(v) a court-martial proceeding; or”

(2)
in paragraph (2), by inserting after “any favorable action” the following: “, or a significant change in a member's duties, responsibilities, or working conditions”.
(b)
Inspector General investigations of allegations— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “paragraph (3)” and inserting “paragraph (4)”;
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraph (A):

“(A) Any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, including a law or regulation prohibiting rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment or unlawful discrimination.”

(3)
by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively;
(4)
by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):

“(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not be excluded from the protections provided in this section because—

“(A) the communication was made to a person who participated in an activity that the member reasonably believed to be covered by paragraph (2);

“(B) the communication revealed information that had previously been communicated;

“(C) of the member’s motive for making the communication;

“(D) the communication was not made in writing;

“(E) the communication was made while the member was off duty;

“(F) the communication was made during the normal course of duties of the member.”

(5)
in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4), as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by inserting before the period at the end of the second sentence the following: “, with the consent of the member”;
(6)
in paragraph (5), as so redesignated—
(A)
by striking “paragraph (3)(A)” and inserting “paragraph (4)(A)”;
(B)
by striking “paragraph (3)(D)” and inserting “paragraph (4)(D)”; and
(C)
by striking “60 days” and inserting “one year”.
(c)
Inspector General investigations of underlying allegations— Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking “subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(2)” and inserting “subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (c)(2)”.
(d)
Reports on investigations— Subsection (e) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “subsection (c)(3)(E)” both places it appears and inserting “subsection (c)(4)(E)”;
(B)
by striking “the Secretary of Defense” and inserting “the Secretary of the military department concerned”;
(C)
by striking “to the Secretary,” and inserting “to such Secretary,”;
(2)
in paragraph (3), by striking “the Secretary of Defense” and inserting “the Secretary of the military department concerned”;
(3)
in paragraph (4), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “The report shall include an explicit determination as to whether a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred and a recommendation as to the disposition of the complaint, including appropriate corrective action for the member.”.
(e)
Action in case of violations— Section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (i) and (j), as redesignated by section 525(b) of this Act, as subsections (k) and (l), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (h), as added by section 525(b), the following new subsection:

“(i) Action in case of violations

“(1) If an Inspector General reports under subsection (e) that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, not later than 30 days after receiving such report from the Inspector General, the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, shall order such action as is necessary to correct the record of a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b), taking into account the recommendations in the report by the Inspector General. Such Secretary shall take any appropriate disciplinary action against the individual who committed such prohibited personnel action.

“(2) If the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, determines that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30 days after making the determination, such Secretary shall—

“(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense, the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and the member or former member, a notice of the determination and the reasons for not taking action; and

“(B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the correction of military records for further review under subsection (g).”

(f)
Correction of records— Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)(C), by striking “may” and inserting “upon the request of the member or former member, after an initial determination that a complaint is not frivolous and has not previously been addressed by the board, shall”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “board elects to hold” and inserting “board holds”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by striking “may be provided” and inserting “shall be provided”; and
(ii)
in clause (ii), by striking “the case is unusually complex or otherwise requires” and inserting “the member or former member would benefit from”.
(g)
Burdens of proof— Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (i), as added by subsection (e) of this section, the following new subsection:

“(j) Burdens of proof—The burdens of proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation conducted by an Inspector General, and any review conducted by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and any board for the correction of military records, under this section.”

(h)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to allegations pending or submitted under section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date.

Sec. 528 Applicability of medical examination requirement regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury to proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice

Section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).

Sec. 529 Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to close a prayer outside of a religious service according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group

(a)
United states army— Section 3547 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.”

(b)
United states military academy— Section 4337 of such title is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(a)” before “There”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.”

(c)
United states navy and marine corps— Section 6031 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.”

(d)
United states air force— Section 8547 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.”

(e)
United states air force academy— Section 9337 of such title is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(a)” before “There”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.”

Sec. 530 Expansion and implementation of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members

(a)
Accommodation of members’ beliefs, actions, and speech— Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is amended—
(1)
by striking “The Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs” and inserting “Except in cases of military necessity, the Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs, actions, and speech”; and
(2)
by inserting “, actions, or speech” after “such beliefs”.
(b)
Narrow exception— Subsection (a)(2) of such section is amended by striking “that threaten” and inserting “that actually harm”.
(c)
Deadline for regulations; consultation— The implementation regulations required by subsection (c) of such section shall be issued not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. In preparing such regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the official military faith-group representatives who endorse military chaplains.

Sec. 530A Servicemembers’ Accountability, Rights, and Responsibilities Training

(a)
Responsibilities of Secretary of Defense—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Secretaries of the military departments, shall ensure that all members of the Armed Forces understand and comply with the rights and responsibilities specified in subsections (b) and (c).
(2)
Implementation— The Secretary of Defense shall have discretion regarding the manner in which this information will be disseminated to members, except that, at a minimum, the Secretary shall require acknowledgment of these rights and responsibilities by a member at these occurrences during the military service of the member:
(A)
Recruitment.
(B)
Enlistment and reenlistment.
(C)
Commissioning.
(D)
Promotion in rank.
(E)
Selection for command.
(b)
Member rights— Each member of the Armed Forces has the following rights:
(1)
To a workplace and battlespace free from the threat of sexual violence, including harassment, abuse, assault, and rape.
(2)
To have every instance of illegal activity appropriately investigated. Law enforcement agencies will investigate every allegation of criminal behavior, and commanders will respond appropriately to every report of wrongdoing.
(3)
To make a restricted or unrestricted report of a sex-based criminal act. Victims will have access to vital services whether they pursue an investigation or not.
(4)
To use any and all reporting and prosecution avenues to pursue an allegation of sexual assault.
(5)
To not face retaliation for reporting a criminal offense or harmful behavior.
(c)
Member responsibilities— Each member of the Armed Forces has the following responsibilities:
(1)
To responsibly intervene in any situation that involves the presence or threat of criminal behavior.
(2)
To never leave another member behind in a situation of risk to self or others, on the battlefield or anywhere else.
(3)
To immediately report observation or knowledge of criminal behavior to appropriate officials.

Sec. 530B Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of sexual assault

(a)
Review required— The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct a review—
(1)
to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after making an unrestricted report of sexual assault;
(2)
to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each such separation, including—
(A)
whether the separation was in retaliation for or influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted report of sexual assault; and
(B)
whether the identified member requested an appeal; and
(3)
if an identified member was separated on the grounds of having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine whether the separation was carried out in compliance with Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and policies.
(b)
Submission of results and recommendations— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the results of the review conducted under subsection (a), including such recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of Defense considers necessary.

Sec. 530C Report on data and information collected in connection with Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces

(a)
Report required— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the specific results and data produced during the research programs, tests, surveys, consultant reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted to comply with the requirement of section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4217) to review laws, policies, and regulations that may restrict the service of female members of the Armed Forces.
(b)
Public availability— Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall make the report required by subsection (a) publically available.
(c)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed as a request or authority for the Secretary of Defense to provide in the report required by subsection (a) any personal information that would identify, or violate the privacy of, members of the Armed Forces, including members who participated in the research programs, tests, surveys, reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted regarding the possible future assignments of female members of the Armed Forces.

Sec. 530D Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
In February 2012, the Secretary of Defense notified Congress of the intent of the Secretary to rescind the co-location restriction and to implement policy exceptions to allow female members of the Armed Forces to be assigned to specified positions in ground combat units at the battalion level.
(2)
On January 24, 2013, the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued guidance to rescind the direct combat exclusion rule for female members of the Armed Forces and eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service in the Armed Forces.
(3)
The Secretaries of the military departments were required to develop and submit their plans for implementation of the rescission of the direct combat exclusion rule by May 15, 2013.
(4)
As of 2013, there are approximately 202,000 female members of the Armed Forces, approximately 20,000 female members have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more than 60 female members have been killed in combat.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the Secretaries of the military departments—
(1)
no later than September 2015, should develop, review, and validate individual occupational standards, using validated gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to assess and assign members of the Armed Forces to units, including Special Operations Forces; and
(2)
no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all assessments.

Sec. 530E Meetings with respect to religious liberty

(a)
Notice—
(1)
In general— The Department of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate advance written notice of any meeting to be held between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of writing, revising, issuing, implementing, enforcing, or seeking advice, input, or counsel regarding military policy related to religious liberty.
(2)
Contents of notice— Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall include information on the time, date, location, and anticipated attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated the meeting.
(3)
Verbal notice— If a meeting to which this subsection applies is scheduled less than 24 hours in advance of the meeting, the notice requirement under paragraph (1) may be satisfied by a phone call if Committee staff provide verbal confirmation of receipt of the notice.
(b)
Reports— Not later than 72 hours after the conclusion of a meeting to which subsection (a) applies, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the meeting, which shall include information on the time, date, location, duration, and attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated the meeting.

Sec. 530F Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Section 207(b)(1) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527(b)(1)) is amended by inserting after “calling the servicemember to military service” the following: “, or other appropriate indicator of military service, including a certified letter from a commanding officer or information from the Defense Manpower Database Center,”.

Sec. 530G Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools

(a)
Conditions on use of test, assessment, or screening tools— In the case of any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment required by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose of identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
implement a means for ensuring that graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, are required to meet the same standard on the test, assessment, or screening tool; and
(2)
use uniform testing requirements and grading standards.
(b)
Rule of construction— Nothing in section 532(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department to create or use a different grading standard on any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized for the purpose of identifying graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces.

Sec. 530H Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the Armed Forces

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report evaluating—
(1)
the use by the Secretaries of the military departments, since January 1, 2007, of the authority to separate members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces due of unfitness for duty because of a mental condition not amounting to disability, including separation on the basis of a personality disorder or adjustment disorder and the total number of members separated on such basis;
(2)
the extent to which the Secretaries failed to comply with regulatory requirements in separating members of the Armed Forces on the basis of a personality or adjustment disorder; and
(3)
the impact of such a separation on the ability of veterans so separated to access service-connected disability compensation, disability severance pay, and disability retirement pay.

D Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and Response

Sec. 531 Limitations on convening authority discretion regarding court-martial findings and sentence

(a)
Elimination of unlimited command prerogative and discretion— Paragraph (1) of section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking the first sentence.
(b)
Limitations on discretion regarding court-martial findings— Paragraph (3) of section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended to read as follows:

“(3)

“(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under this section is not required.

“(B) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts on the findings of a court-martial, the convening authority or other person may not—

“(i) dismiss any charge or specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto; or

“(ii) change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification.

“(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts on the findings to dismiss or change any charge or specification for a qualifying offense, the convening authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon.

“(D)

“(i) In this paragraph, the term qualifying offense means, except in the case of an offense specified in clause (ii), an offense under this chapter for which—

“(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be adjudged does not exceed two years; and

“(II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more than six months.

“(ii) Such term does not include the following:

“(I) An offense under section 920 of this title (article 120).

“(II) An offense under section 928 of this title (article 128), if such offense consisted of assault consummated by battery upon child under 16 years of age.

“(III) An offense under section 934 of this title (article 134), if such offense consisted of indecent language communicated to child under the age of 16 years.

“(IV) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may exclude by regulation.”

(c)
Limitations on discretion to modify an adjudged sentence— Section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2), by striking “The convening authority” and inserting the following:

“(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening authority”

(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4)

“(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive discharge or disapprove, commute, or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive discharge in whole or in part.

“(B)

“(i) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section shall have the authority to impose a sentence below a level established by statute as a minimum sentence, to impose a sentence of confinement below the adjudged confinement sentence, or to disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged sentence in whole or in part in recognition of the substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense.

“(ii) If a mandatory minimum sentence exists for a charge, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence to reduce the sentence to less than the mandatory minimum sentence or disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged mandatory minimum sentence in whole or in part. This limitation does not restrict the discretion of the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section to modify, disapprove, commute, or suspend any portion of the adjudged sentence that is in addition to the mandatory minimum sentence.

“(C) In addition, if a mandatory minimum sentence does not exist for a charge and a pre-trial agreement has been entered into by the convening authority and the accused, as authorized by Rule for Court-Martial 705, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may take action to reduce, dismiss, or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement in whole or in part pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial agreement.”

(d)
Explanation for any decision disapproving, commuting, or suspending court-martial sentence— Section 860(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by subsection (c)(1), is further amended—
(1)
by inserting “(A)” after “(2)”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts to disapprove, commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in part, the convening authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon.”

(e)
Conforming amendment to other authority for convening authority to suspend sentence— Section 871(d) of such title (article 71(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (c) of section 860 of this title (article 60) shall apply to any decision by the convening authority or such person to suspend the execution of any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.”.
(f)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to findings and sentences of courts-martial reported to convening authorities under section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by this section, on or after that effective date.

Sec. 532 Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes

(a)
Inclusion of additional offenses— Section 843(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking “rape, or rape of a child” and inserting “rape or sexual assault, or rape or sexual assault of a child”.
(b)
Conforming amendment— Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, unless the offense is covered by subsection (a)”.
(c)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section 920(b) or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) that is committed on or after that date.

Sec. 533 Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of offenses by general courts-martial

(a)
Mandatory discharge or dismissal required—
(1)
Imposition— Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(A)
by inserting “(a)” before “The punishment”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b)

“(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a minimum, dismissal or dishonorable discharge.

“(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:

“(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).

“(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 125).

“(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80).”

(2)
Clerical amendments—
(A)
Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits”

(B)
Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item:
(b)
Jurisdiction limited to general courts-martial— Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(a)” before the first sentence;
(2)
in the third sentence, by striking “However, a general court-martial” and inserting the following:

“(b) A general court-martial”

(3)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)).”

(c)
Additional duties for independent panels—
(1)
Response systems panel— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the appropriateness of statutorily mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section.
(2)
Judicial proceedings panel— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the implementation and effect of the mandatory minimum sentences established by section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a) of this section. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.
(d)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

Sec. 534 Regulations regarding consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victims of sexual assault

Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The Secretaries of the military departments” and inserting “The Secretary concerned”.

Sec. 535 Consideration of need for, and authority to provide for, temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense

(a)
In general— Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 673 the following new section:

“674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense

“(a) Guidance for timely consideration and action—The Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have committed a sexual assault or other sex-related offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, or 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the member’s unit.

“(b) Time for determinations—A determination described in subsection (a) may be made at any time after receipt of notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 673 the following new item:
(c)
Additional training requirement for commanders— The Secretary of Defense shall provide for inclusion of information and discussion regarding the availability and use of the authority provided by section 674 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

Sec. 536 Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses and related provisions

(a)
Designation and duties—
(1)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1044d the following new section:

“1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses

“(a) Designation; purposes—The Secretary concerned shall designate legal counsel (to be known as “Victims’ Counsel”) for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted.

“(b) Types of legal assistance authorized—The types of legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the following:

“(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal liability of the victim stemming from or in relation to the circumstances surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and the victim’s right to seek military defense services.

“(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness Assistance Program, including—

“(A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim;

“(B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between the victim and the liaison; and

“(C) the nature of communication made to the liaison in comparison to communication made to a Victims’ Counsel or a legal assistance attorney under section 1044 of this title.

“(3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim Advocate or domestic abuse advocate, to include any privileges that may exist regarding communications between those persons and the victim.

“(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil litigation against other parties (other than the Department of Defense).

“(5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice system, including—

“(A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel, the defense counsel, and investigators;

“(B) any proceedings of the military justice process in which the victim may observe or participate as a witness or other party;

“(C) the Government’s authority to compel cooperation and testimony; and

“(D) the victim’s responsibility to testify, and other duties to the court.

“(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in connection with the reporting, military investigation, and military prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense.

“(7) Legal consultation regarding—

“(A) services available from appropriate agencies or offices for emotional and mental health counseling and other medical services;

“(B) eligibility for and requirements for obtaining any available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional compensation benefits found in section 1059 of this title and other State and Federal victims’ compensation programs; and

“(C) the availability of, and any protections offered by, civilian and military restraining orders.

“(8) Legal consultation and assistance in personal civil legal matters in accordance with section 1044 of this title.

“(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of Defense (or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) may authorize in the regulations prescribed under subsection (g).

“(c) Qualifications—An individual may not be designated as a Victims’ Counsel under this section unless the individual—

“(1) meets the qualifications specified in section 1044(d)(2) of this title; and

“(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a Victims’ Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the Armed Force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which the civilian attorney is employed.

“(d) Administrative responsibility

“(1) Consistent with the regulations prescribed under subsection (g), the Judge Advocate General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the Marine Corps the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, is responsible for the establishment and supervision of individuals designated as Victims’ Counsel.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation of the Victims’ Counsel programs operated under this section.

“(e) Availability of victims’ counsel

“(1) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense shall be offered the option of receiving assistance from a Victims’ Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related offense or at the time the victim seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes of this subsection.

“(2) The assistance of a Victims’ Counsel under this subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title regardless of whether the individual elects unrestricted or restricted reporting of the alleged sex-related offense. The individual shall also be informed that the assistance of a Victims’ Counsel may be declined, in whole or in part, but that declining such assistance does not preclude the individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a Victims’ Counsel.

“(f) Alleged sex-related offense defined—In this section, the term “alleged sex-related offense” means any allegation of—

“(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of ths title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or

“(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(g) Regulations—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1044d the following new item:
(3)
Conforming amendments—
(A)
Qualifications of persons providing legal assistance— Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “and, for purposes of service as a Victims’ Counsel under section 1044e of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified in subsection (c)(2) of such section.”.
(B)
Inclusion in definition of military legal assistance— Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking “and 1044d” and inserting “1044d, 1044e, and 1565b(a)(1)(A)”.
(C)
Access to legal assistance and services— Section 1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking “section 1044” and inserting “sections 1044 and 1044e”.
(4)
Implementation— Section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented within six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Enhanced Training Requirement— The Secretary of each military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy, shall implement, consistent with the guidelines provided under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), in-depth and advanced training for all military and civilian attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or 1044e of such to support victims of alleged sex-related offenses.
(c)
Secretary of Defense implementation report—
(1)
Report required— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will implement the requirements of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(2)
Additional submission requirement— The report required by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent review panel established by the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) and to the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice.
(c)
Additional duties for independent panels—
(1)
Response systems panel— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of Victims’ Counsel to provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to victims of alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to include legal standing to represent the victim during investigative and military justice proceedings in connection with the prosecution of the offense. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section.
(2)
Judicial proceedings panel— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment of the implementation and effect of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and make such recommendations for modification of such section 1044e as the panel considers appropriate. The panel shall include the results of the assessment and its recommendations in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.

Sec. 537 Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault

Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “sexual harassment or” and inserting “rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment, or”.

Sec. 538 Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice process

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing—
(1)
an assessment of the current role and authorities of commanders in the administration of military justice and the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and
(2)
a recommendation by the Secretary of Defense regarding whether the role and authorities of commanders should be further modified or repealed.

Sec. 539 Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of sex-related offenses

(a)
Review— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the practices of the military criminal investigative organizations (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special Investigation) regarding the investigation of alleged sex-related offenses involving members of the Armed Forces, including the extent to which the military criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation of a sex-related offense appears founded or unfounded.
(b)
Policy— After conducting the review required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform policy for the Armed Forces, to the extent practicable, regarding the use of case determinations to record the results of the investigation of a sex-related offense. In developing the policy, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility of adopting case determination methods, such as the uniform crime report, used by nonmilitary law enforcement agencies.
(c)
Sex-related offense defined— In this section, the term “sex-related offense” includes—
(1)
any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
(2)
an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Sec. 540 Uniform training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program

Section 585(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in the first sentence, by striking “Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall develop a curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response training and education for members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary and civilian employees of the military department” and inserting “Not later than June 30, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response training and education for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense”; and
(B)
in the second sentence, by inserting “including lesson plans to achieve core competencies and learning objectives,” after “curriculum,”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by striking “Consistent training.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure” and inserting “Uniform training.—The Secretary of Defense shall require”; and
(B)
by striking “consistent” and inserting “uniform”.

Sec. 541 Development of selection criteria for assignment as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent

(a)
Qualifications for assignment— Section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and
(2)
by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

“(A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, whether assigned to such duty on a full-time or part-time basis;

“(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training, certification, and status of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the department assigned to duty as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; and”

(b)
Assignment of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent to Certain Military Units—
(1)
Assignment to certain military units— Section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—
(A)
by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent

“(1) Assignment requirements—The Secretary of each military department shall assign at least one Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent unit level of each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary unless assignment to other units is determined to be more practicable and effective by the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of the military department concerned may assign additional Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent as necessary based on the demographics or needs of a military unit. The Secretary of the military department concerned may waive the assignment requirement for a specific unit level if that Secretary determines that compliance will impose an undue burden, except that the Secretary shall notify Congress of each waiver and explain how compliance would impose an undue burden.

“(2) Eligible persons—On and after October 1, 2015, only members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent. The Secretary of the military department concerned may satisfy paragraph (1) through the assignment of additional personnel to a unit or by assigning the duties of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to current personnel of the unit, so long as such personnel meet the training and certification requirements of subsection (d).”

(2)
Training and certification— Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A), is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1), by striking “assigned under subsection (a) and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates assigned under subsection (b)” and inserting “, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent assigned under this section”;
(B)
in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “In the case of the curriculum and other components of the program for certification of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent, the Secretary of Defense shall utilize the most recent guidelines and standards as outlined by the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women, in the National Training Standards for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examiners.”; and
(C)
in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “On and after October 1, 2015, before a member or civilian employee may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent under subsection (c), the member or employee must have completed the training program required by paragraph (1) and obtained the certification.”.
(c)
Conforming amendments— Section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1432) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(2), by inserting “who satisfy the selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431)” after “Defense”; and
(2)
in subsection (b)(2), by inserting “who satisfy the selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011” after “Defense”.
(d)
Clerical amendment— The heading of section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended to read as follows:

“584. Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent”

Sec. 542 Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice

(a)
Victims' rights—
(1)
In general— Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new section (article):

“806b. Art. 6b. Rights of victims of offenses under this chapter

“(a) Rights of a victim of a military crime—A victim of a military crime has the following rights:

“(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

“(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public proceeding in an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32), court-martial, involuntary plea hearing, pre-sentencing hearing, or parole hearing involving the offense or of any release or escape of the accused.

“(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public proceeding, referred to in paragraph (2) unless the military judge, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim of a military crime would be materially altered if the victim of a military crime heard other testimony at that proceeding.

“(4) The reasonable right to confer with the trial counsel in the case.

“(5) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.

“(6) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.

“(7) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of a military crime.

“(b) Duty of military judge—In any court-martial proceeding involving an offense against a victim of a military crime, the military judge shall ensure that the victim of a military crime is afforded the rights described in subsection (a). Before making a determination described in subsection (a)(3), the military judge shall make every effort to permit the fullest attendance possible by the victim of a military crime and shall consider reasonable alternatives to the exclusion of the victim of a military crime from the criminal proceeding. The reasons for any decision denying relief under this subsection shall be clearly stated on the record.

“(c) Best efforts required

“(1) Military judges, trial and defense counsel, military criminal investigation organizations, services, and personnel, and other members and personnel of the Department of Defense engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of offenses under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) shall make their best efforts to see that a victim of a military crime is notified of, and accorded, the rights described in subsection .

“(2) The trial counsel in a case shall advise a victim of a military crime that the victim of a military crime can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights described in subsection (a).

“(3) Notice of release otherwise required pursuant to this chapter shall not be given if such notice may endanger the safety of any person.

“(d) Victim of a military crime defined

“(1) Definition—In this section, the term “victim of a military crime” means a person who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime in violation of this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or in violation of the law of another jurisdiction if any portion of the investigation of the violation of that law was conducted primarily by a military criminal investigative organization (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, or Air Force Office of Special Investigation). The term shall include, at a minimum, the following:

“(A) Members of the armed forces and their dependents.

“(B) Civilian employees of the Department of Defense and contractor employees stationed outside the continental United States and their dependents residing with them.

“(C) Such other individuals as the Secretary of Defense determines should be included.

“(2) Treatment of certain victims—In the case of a victim of a military crime who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the term shall also include an individual acting on behalf of the victim who is (in order of precedence) a spouse, parent, legal guardian, child, sibling, or another dependent of the victim or another person designated by the military judge, but in no event shall an accused be designated or included.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
Procedures To promote compliance—
(1)
In general— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the President changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial, and prescribe such other regulations as the Secretary considers appropriate, to implement section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a).
(2)
Elements— The modifications and regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
The designation of an administrative authority within the Department of Defense to oversee the implementation of such section 806(b), and within each Armed Force, an authority to receive and investigate complaints relating to the provision or violation of the rights of victims of military crimes.
(B)
A requirement for a course of training for judge advocates and other appropriate members of the Armed Forces and personnel of the Department to promote compliance with and implementation of such section 806b and assist such personnel in responding more effectively to the needs of victims of military crimes.
(C)
Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense, including suspension or termination from employment in the case of employees of the Department, who willfully or wantonly fail to comply with such section 806b.
(D)
Mechanisms to ensure that the Secretary of Defense shall be the final arbiter of a complaint authorized pursuant to subparagraph (A) by a victim of a military crime that the victim was not afforded a right under such section 806b.
(c)
Additional duty for Response systems independent panel— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the legal standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights provided by subsection (d) of such section. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section.

Sec. 543 Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate

Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(a) Opportunity To obtain witnesses and other evidence.—”before “The trial counsel”;
(2)
by striking “Process issued” and inserting the following:

“(c) Process—Process issued”

(3)
by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b):

“(b) Interview of complaining witnesses by defense counsel

“(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel of the name and address of the complaining witness or witnesses trial counsel intends to call to testify in any portion of an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense counsel shall make all requests to interview any such complaining witness through trial counsel.

“(2) If requested by a complaining witness subject to a request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of the witness by defense counsel shall take place only in the presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.

“(3) In this subsection, the term “complaining witness” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).”

Sec. 544 Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of courts-martial process

Section 860(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(A)” after “(b)(1)”;
(2)
by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively, and, in such subparagraphs as so redesignated, by striking “paragraph (1)” each place it appears and inserting “subparagraph (A)”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(2)

“(A) In any case in which findings and sentence have been adjudged for an offense involving a complaining witness, the complaining witness shall be provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under this section before the convening authority or such other person takes action under this section. Such a submission shall be made within 10 days after the complaining witness has been given an authenticated record of trial and, if applicable, the recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal officer under subsection (d).

“(B) If a complaining witness shows that additional time is required for submission of matters under subparagraph (A), the convening authority or other person taking action under this section, for good cause, may extend the submission period for not more than an additional 20 days.

“(C) In this paragraph, the term “complaining witness” means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(3) The convening authority shall not consider under this section any submitted matters that go to the character of a complaining witness unless such matters were presented at the trial.”

Sec. 545 Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed Forces

(a)
Incident reporting policy requirement— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to require the submission by a designated person of a written incident report not later than eight days after an unrestricted report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, this incident report shall be provided to the following:
(1)
The installation commander, if such incident occurred on or in the vicinity of a military installation.
(2)
The first officer in the grade of 0–6 in the chain of command of the victim.
(3)
The first general officer or flag officer in the chain of command of the victim.
(b)
Purpose of the report— The purpose of the required incident report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or in progress to provide the necessary care and support to the victim of the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to the appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide initial notification of the serious incident when that notification has not already taken place.
(c)
Elements of report—
(1)
In general— The report of an incident under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
Time/Date/Location of incident.
(B)
Type of offense allegation.
(C)
Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the victim.
(D)
Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the alleged offender, including information regarding whether the alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed from an assigned billet or ordered to pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted, if applicable.
(E)
Post-incident actions taken in connection with the incident, including the following:
(i)
Referral of the victim to medical services and all other services available for members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual assault, including the date of each such referral.
(ii)
Receipt and processing status of a request for expedited victim transfer, if applicable.
(iii)
Notification of incident to appropriate investigatory offices, including the organization notified and date of such notification.
(iv)
Issuance of any military protective orders in connection with the incident.
(2)
Modification—
(A)
In general— The Secretary of Defense may modify the elements required in a report under this section regarding an incident involving a member of the Armed Forces (including the Coast Guard when it is operating as service in the Department of the Navy) if the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate compliance with best practices for such reporting as identified by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office of the Department of Defense.
(B)
Coast Guard— The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may modify the elements required in a report under this section regarding an incident involving a member of the Coast Guard if the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate compliance with best practices for such reporting as identified by the Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs.
(3)
For official use only— A report under this section shall be intended for official use only and shall not be distributed beyond the requirements listed above.
(d)
Regulations— Not later than 180 days after enactment, The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

Sec. 546 Amendment to Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate considerations relating to character and military service of accused in initial disposition of sex-related offenses

(a)
Amendment required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the President a proposed amendment to rule 306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on initial disposition of offenses) to eliminate the character and military service of the accused from the list of factors that may be considered by the disposition authority in disposing of a sex-related offense.
(b)
Sex-related offense defined— In this section, a “sex-related offense” includes—
(1)
any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or
(2)
an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Sec. 547 Inclusion of letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of reprimands and counseling statements

(a)
Inclusion in performance evaluation reports— The Secretary of Defense shall require commanders to include letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of actions and counseling statements involving substantiated cases of sexual harassment or sexual assault in the performance evaluation report of a member of the Armed Forces for the purpose of—
(1)
providing commanders increased visibility of the background information of members of the unit;
(2)
identifying and preventing trends of bad behavior early and effectively disciplining repeated actions which hinder units from fostering a healthy climate; and
(3)
preventing the transfer of sexual offenders.
(b)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “sexual harassment” has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program.
(2)
The term “sexual assault” means any of the offenses described in section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Sec. 548 Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training

(a)
Defining inappropriate and prohibited relationships, communication, conduct, and contact between certain members—
(1)
Policy required— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to uniformly define and prescribe, for the persons described in paragraph (2), what constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an action is consensual, between a member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B).
(2)
Covered members— The policy required by paragraph (1) shall apply to—
(A)
a member of the Armed Forces who is superior in rank to, exercises authority or control over, or supervises a person described in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level processing or training of the person; and
(B)
a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a member of the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing or training.
(3)
Inclusion of certain members required— The members of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall include, at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached to duty—
(A)
for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons for enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, warrant officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces;
(B)
at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or
(C)
at an entry-level training facility or school of an Armed Force.
(b)
Effect of violations— A member of the Armed Forces who violates the policy established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
(c)
Processing for administrative separation—
(1)
In general—
(A)
The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall require the processing for administrative separation of any member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated violation by the member of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a), when the member is not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed from the Armed Forces for that violation.
(B)
The Secretary of each military department shall revise regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary as necessary to ensure compliance with the requirement under subparagraph (A).
(2)
Required elements—
(A)
In imposing the requirement under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces is based on the full facts of the case and that due process procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the Secretaries, pursuant to subsection (f).
(B)
The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not be interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members of the Armed Forces for administrative separation—
(i)
for reasons other than a substantiated violation of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a); or
(ii)
under other provisions of law or regulation.
(3)
Substantiated violation— For purposes of paragraph (1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be treated as substantiated if—
(A)
there has been a court-martial conviction for violation of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not include discharge or dismissal; or
(B)
a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) has determined that a member has committed an offense in violation of the policy and imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the member.
(d)
Proposed Uniform Code of Military Justice punitive article— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives—
(1)
a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to create an additional article under subchapter X of such chapter regarding violations of the policy required by subsection (a); and
(2)
the conforming changes to part IV, punitive articles, in the Manual for Courts-Martial that will be necessary upon adoption of such article.
(e)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “entry-level processing or training”, with respect to a member of the Armed forces, means the period beginning on the date on which the member became a member of the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the member physically arrives at that member’s first duty assignment following completion of initial entry training (or its equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating.
(2)
The term “prospective member of the Armed Forces” means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person eventually becomes a member of the Armed Forces.
(f)
Regulations— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the extent practicable, the regulations are uniform for each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary.

Sec. 549 Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases

(a)
Additional duties for response systems panel regarding disposition authority—
(1)
In general— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall—
(A)
conduct an assessment of the impact, if any, that removing from the chain of command any disposition authority regarding charges preferred under the Uniform Code of Military Justice would have on overall reporting and prosecution of sexual assault cases; and
(B)
review and provide comment on the report of the Secretary of Defense on the role of military commanders in the military justice process, which is required pursuant to section 538 of this Act.
(2)
Submission of results— The panel shall include the results of the assessment and review and its recommendations and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section.
(b)
Earlier submission deadline for report of the response systems panel— Subsection (c) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph:

“(1) Response systems panel—Not later than one year after the date of the first meeting of the panel established under subsection (a)(1), the panel shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, through the Secretary of Defense, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The panel shall terminate 30 days after submission of such report.”

(c)
Additional duty for response systems panel regarding instances of members’ abusing chain of command position to gain access to or coerce another person for a sex-related offense—
(1)
In general— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment of instances in the Armed Forces in which a member of the Armed Forces has committing a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the other person to gain access to or coerce the other person.
(2)
Submission of results— The panel shall include the results of the assessment and its recommendations and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section.
(d)
Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding additional revision of definition of Article 120 sex-related offenses— The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the likely consequences of amending of definition of rape and sexual assault under article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expressly cover a situation in which a person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the other person to gain access to or coerce the other person. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576.

Sec. 550 Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases

(a)
Review required— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection (b).
(b)
Elements of study— In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps in the Office;
(2)
identify and evaluate the role of the Office in sexual harassment cases; and
(3)
evaluate how the Office works with the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office to address sexual harassment in the Armed Forces.
(c)
Definition— In this section, the term “sexual harassment” has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program.

Sec. 550A Discharge or dismissal, and confinement required for certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces

(a)
Mandatory punishments—
(1)
Imposition— Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(A)
by inserting “(a)” before “The punishment”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b)

“(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a minimum—

“(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and

“(B) confinement for two years.

“(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses:

“(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)).

“(B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 125).

“(C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80).”

(2)
Clerical amendments—
(A)
Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits”

(B)
Table of sections— The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item:
(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed after that date.

Sec. 550B Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources

(a)
Required posting of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources—
(1)
Posting— The Secretary of Defense shall require that there be prominently posted, in accordance with paragraph (2), notice of the following information relating to sexual assault prevention and response, in a form designed to ensure visibility and understanding:
(A)
Resource information for members of the Armed Forces, military dependents, and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense with respect to prevention of sexual assault and reporting of incidents of sexual assault.
(B)
Contact information for personnel who are designated as Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates.
(C)
The Department of Defense “hotline” telephone number, referred to as the Safe Helpline, for reporting incidents of sexual assault, or any successor operation.
(2)
Posting placement— Posting under subsection (a) shall be at the following locations, to the extent practicable:
(A)
Any Department of Defense duty facility.
(B)
Any Department of Defense dining facility.
(C)
Any Department of Defense multi-unit residential facility.
(D)
Any Department of Defense health care facility.
(E)
Any Department of Defense commissary or exchange.
(F)
Any Department of Defense Community Service Agency.
(G)
Any Department of Defense website.
(b)
Notice to victims of available assistance— The Secretary of Defense shall require that procedures in the Department of Defense for responding to a complaint or allegation of sexual assault submitted by or against a member of the Armed Forces include prompt notice to the person making the complaint or allegation of the forms of assistance available to that person from the Department of Defense and, to the extent known to the Secretary, through other departments and agencies, including State and local agencies, and other sources.

Sec. 550C Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel

(a)
Establishment— There is established a panel to be known as the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel (in this section referred to as the “Panel”).
(b)
Membership— The Panel shall be composed of the following members:
(1)
The Secretary of the Army or the Secretary’s designee.
(2)
The Secretary of the Navy or the Secretary’s designee.
(3)
The Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary’s designee.
(4)
The Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast Guard) or the Secretary’s designee.
(5)
Members appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among individuals who are not officers or employees of any government and who have expertise in advocating for—
(A)
women;
(B)
racial or ethnic minorities;
(C)
religious minorities; or
(D)
gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender individuals.
(c)
Duties— The Panel shall—
(1)
make recommendations to the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code) on the development of the policies, programs, and procedures to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces; and
(2)
monitor any policies, programs, and procedures in place to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces and make recommendations to the Secretary concerned on ways to improve such policies, programs, and procedures.
(d)
Initial Meeting— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Panel shall hold its initial meeting.
(e)
Meetings— The Panel shall meet not less than annually.

Sec. 550D Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each of the military service academies adds a section in the ethics curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and character development as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula shall include a brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the Armed Forces, a definition of sexual assault, information relating to reporting a sexual assault, victims’ rights, and dismissal and dishonorable discharge for offenders. Such ethics training shall be provided within 60 days after the initial arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at a military services academy and repeated in annual ethics training requirements.

Sec. 550E Ensuring awareness of policy to instruct victims of sexual assault seeking security clearance to answer “no” to question 21

(a)
Ensuring awareness of policy— The Secretary of Defense shall inform members of the United States Armed Forces of the policy described in subsection (b)—
(1)
at the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment and commissioning; and
(2)
during sexual assault awareness training and service member interactions with sexual assault response coordinators.
(b)
Policy described— The policy described in this subsection is the policy of instructing an individual to answer “no” to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a health care professional if—
(1)
the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and
(2)
the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual assault.

Sec. 550F Report on policies and regulations regarding service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV

(a)
Report to Congress— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations with regard to service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV.
(b)
Contents— The report shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of whether the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations are exercised in a way that demonstrates an evidence-based, medically accurate understanding of—
(A)
the multiple factors that lead to HIV transmission;
(B)
the relative risk of HIV transmission routes;
(C)
the associated benefits of treatment and support services for people living with HIV; and
(D)
the impact of HIV-specific policies and regulations on public health and on people living with or at risk of contracting HIV.
(2)
A review of court-martial decisions in recent years preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
(3)
Recommendations for adjustments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations, as may be necessary, in order to ensure that policies and regulations regarding service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV are in accordance with a contemporary understanding of HIV transmission routes and associated benefits of treatment.
(c)
Definition of HIV— In this section, the term “HIV” means infection with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Sec. 550G Additional modification of annual Department of Defense reporting requirements regarding sexual assaults and prevention and response program

(a)
Additional elements of each report— Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

“(11) A description of the implementation of the comprehensive policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to comply with section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note).

“(12) The policies, procedures, and processes implemented by the Secretary concerned to ensure detailed evidence and records are transmitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs, including medical records of sexual assault victims that accurately and completely describe the physical and emotional injuries resulting from a sexual trauma that occurred during active duty service.”

(b)
Application of amendments— The amendment made by this section shall apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2014, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.

E Military Family Readiness

Sec. 551 Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones

(a)
Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons— Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

“1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation

“(a) Design and eligibility—A lapel button, to be known as the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the spouse of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days.

“(b) Presentation—The Secretary concerned may authorize the use of appropriated funds to procure spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation to eligible spouses of members.

“(c) Exception to time-period requirement—The 30-day period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the expiration the period.

“(d) License to manufacture and sell lapel buttons—Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this section.

“(e) Combat zone defined—In this section, the term “combat zone” has the meaning given that term in section 112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

“(f) Regulations—The Secretary of Defense shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1126 the following new item:
(c)
Sense of congress regarding implementation— It is the sense of Congress that, as soon as practicable once the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button becomes available, the Secretary of Defense should—
(1)
widely announce the availability of spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons through military and public information channels; and
(2)
encourage commanders at all levels to conduct ceremonies recognizing the support provided by spouses of members of the Armed Forces and to use the ceremonies as an opportunity for members to present their spouses with a spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button.

Sec. 552 Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces

(a)
Child custody protection— Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“208. Child custody protection

“(a) Restriction on temporary custody order—If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall require that, upon the return of the servicemember from deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be subject to subsection (b).

“(b) Limitation on consideration of member’s deployment in determination of Child’s Best Interest—If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child.

“(c) No federal jurisdiction or right of action or removal—Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal.

“(d) Preemption—In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard.

“(e) Deployment Defined—In this section, the term “deployment” means the movement or mobilization of a servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or permanent official orders—

“(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;

“(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or

“(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family members to that location.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title II the following new item:

Sec. 553 Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing

(a)
In general— Title III of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act is amended by inserting after section 303 (50 U.S.C. App. 533) the following new section:

“303A. Treatment of relocation of servicemembers for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing

“(a) Treatment of absence from residence due to active duty—While a servicemember who is the mortgagor under an existing mortgage does not reside in the residence that secures the existing mortgage because of a relocation described in subsection (c)(1)(B), if the servicemember inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage, the servicemember shall be considered, for all purposes relating to the covered refinancing mortgage (including such inquiry or application and eligibility for, and compliance with, any underwriting criteria and standards regarding such covered refinancing mortgage) to occupy the residence that secures the existing mortgage to be paid or prepaid by such covered refinancing mortgage as the principal residence of the servicemember during the period of such relocation.

“(b) Limitation—Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a servicemember who inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage if, during the 5-year period preceding the date of such inquiry or application, the servicemember entered into a covered refinancing mortgage pursuant to this section.

“(c) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Existing mortgage—The term “existing mortgage” means a mortgage that is secured by a 1- to 4-family residence, including a condominium or a share in a cooperative ownership housing association, that was the principal residence of a servicemember for a period that—

“(A) had a duration of 13 consecutive months or longer; and

“(B) ended upon the relocation of the servicemember caused by the servicemember receiving military orders for a permanent change of station or to deploy with a military unit, or as an individual in support of a military operation, for a period of not less than 18 months that did not allow the servicemember to continue to occupy such residence as a principal residence.

“(2) Covered refinancing mortgage—The term “covered refinancing mortgage” means any mortgage that—

“(A) is made for the purpose of paying or prepaying, and extinguishing, the outstanding obligations under an existing mortgage or mortgages; and

“(B) is secured by the same residence that secured such existing mortgage or mortgages.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 303 the following new item:

Sec. 554 Family support programs for immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces

(a)
Pilot programs authorized— Consistent with such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to carry out this section, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities for the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces.
(b)
Selection of programs— In selecting the pilot programs to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall—
(1)
identify family support activities that have a direct and concrete impact on the readiness of special operations forces, but that are not being provided to the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces by the Secretary of a military department; and
(2)
conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support activity proposed to be included in a pilot program.
(c)
Evaluation— The Commander shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of each family support activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a).
(d)
Additional authority— The Commander may expend up to $5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection (f) to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a).
(e)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “Commander” means the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command.
(2)
The term “immediate family members” has the meaning given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States Code.
(3)
The term “special operations forces” means those forces of the Armed Forces identified as special operations forces under section 167(i) of such title.
(f)
Duration of pilot program authority— The authority provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander during fiscal years 2014 through 2016.
(g)
Report— Not later than 180 days after completing a pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program.

Sec. 555 Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from military to civilian life

(a)
Findings— The Congress finds the following:
(1)
Members of the Armed Forces and their families make great sacrifices on behalf of the United States, and, when their active duty service is successfully concluded, members deserve the opportunity to also make a successful transition to the civilian labor force.
(2)
When transitioning from active duty in the Armed Forces to civilian employment, members often face barriers that make it difficult to fully utilize the skills and training they gained during their military service.
(3)
Members and veterans are too often required to repeat education or training in order to receive industry certifications and State occupational licenses, even though their military training and experience often overlaps with the certification or licensing requirements.
(4)
When members are transferred from military assignment to military assignment, their spouses often face barriers to transferring their credentials and to securing employment in their new location.
(5)
More than one million members will make the transition to civilian life in the coming years.
(6)
The Department of Defense established the Military Credentialing and Licensing Task Force in 2012.
(7)
The Joining Forces program, a national initiative to mobilize all sectors of society to give members of the Armed Forces and their families the opportunities and support they have earned, will make it easier for members and their families to transfer skills learned while the member was serving in the Armed Forces to civilian employment.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Federal Government and State governments should make the transition of a member of the Armed Forces and the member's spouse from military to civilian life as seamless as possible by creating opportunities for the member and spouse to earn, while the member is in the Armed Forces, civilian occupational credentials and licenses, with an emphasis on well-paying industries and occupations that have a high demand for skilled workers, including: manufacturing, information technology, transportation and logistics, health care, and emergency medical services;
(2)
the Federal Government should assist State governments in translating military training and experience into credit towards professional licensure; and
(3)
State governments should streamline approaches for assessing the equivalency of military training and experience, and accelerate occupational licensing processes for members, veterans, and their spouses.

Sec. 556 Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

(a)
Members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses, and certain disabled veterans—
(1)
In general— Title III of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 303A, as added by section 553, the following new section:

“303B. Mortgages and trust deeds of certain servicemembers, surviving spouses, and disabled veterans

“(a) Mortgage as Security—This section applies only to an obligation on real or personal property owned by a covered individual that—

“(1) originated at any time and for which the covered individual is still obligated; and

“(2) is secured by a mortgage, trust deed, or other security in the nature of a mortgage.

“(b) Stay of Proceedings

“(1) In general—In accordance with subsection (d)(1), in a judicial action pending or in a nonjudicial action commenced during a covered time period to enforce an obligation described in subsection (a), a court—

“(A) may, after a hearing and on its own motion, stay the proceedings until the end of the covered time period; and

“(B) shall, upon application by a covered individual, stay the proceedings until the end of the covered time period.

“(2) Obligation to stop proceedings—Upon receipt of notice provided under subsection (d)(1), a mortgagee, trustee, or other creditor seeking to foreclose on real property secured by an obligation covered by this section using any judicial or nonjudicial proceedings shall immediately stop any such proceeding until the end of the covered time period.

“(c) Sale or Foreclosure—A sale, judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure of property for a breach of an obligation described in subsection (a) that is not stayed under subsection (b) shall not be valid during a covered time period except—

“(1) upon a court order granted before such sale, judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure with a return made and approved by the court; or

“(2) if made pursuant to an agreement as provided in section 107.

“(d) Notice required

“(1) In general—To be covered under this section, a covered individual shall provide to the mortgagee, trustee, or other creditor written notice that such individual is so covered.

“(2) Manner—Written notice under paragraph (1) may be provided electronically.

“(3) Time—Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall be provided during the covered time period.

“(4) Contents—With respect to a servicemember described in subsection (g)(1)(A), notice shall include—

“(A) a copy of the servicemember’s official military orders, or any notification, certification, or verification from a servicemember's commanding officer that provides evidence of servicemember's eligibility for special pay as described in subsection (g)(1)(A); or

“(B) an official notice using a form designed under paragraph (5).

“(5) Official forms

“(A) In general—The Secretary of Defense shall design and distribute an official Department of Defense form that can be used by an individual to give notice under paragraph (1).

“(B) Use of official form not required—Failure by any individual to use a form designed or distributed under subparagraph (A) to provide notice shall not make such provision of notice invalid.

“(e) Aggregate duration—The aggregate duration for which a covered individual (except a servicemember described in subsection (g)(1)(A)) may be covered under this section is one year.

“(f) Misdemeanor—A person who knowingly makes or causes to be made a sale, foreclosure, or seizure of property that is prohibited by subsection (c), or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

“(g) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) Covered individual—The term covered individual means the following individuals:

“(A) A servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a period of military service.

“(B) A servicemember placed on convalescent status, including a servicemember transferred to the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States Code.

“(C) A veteran who was medically discharged and retired under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, except for a veteran described in section 1207 of such title.

“(D) A surviving spouse (as defined in section 101(3) of title 38, United States Code, and in accordance with section 103 of such title) of a servicemember who died while in military service if such spouse is the successor in interest to property covered under subsection (a).

“(2) Covered time period—The term covered time period means the following time periods:

“(A) With respect to a servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a period of military service, during the period beginning on the first day on which the servicemember is or was eligible for such special pay during such period of military service and ending on the date that is one year after the last day of such period of military service.

“(B) With respect to a servicemember described in paragraph (1)(B), during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the servicemember is placed on convalescent status or transferred to the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States Code.

“(C) With respect to a veteran described in paragraph (1)(C), during the one-year period beginning on the date of the retirement of such veteran.

“(D) With respect to a surviving spouse of a servicemember as described in paragraph (1)(D), during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the spouse receives notice of the death of the servicemember.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 303 the following new item:
(3)
Conforming amendment— Section 107 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 517) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(e) Other individuals—For purposes of this section, the term servicemember includes any covered individual under section 303B.”

(b)
Increased civil penalties for mortgage violations— Paragraph (3) of section 801(b) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 597(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows:

“(3) to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty—

“(A) with respect to a violation of section 207, 303, or 303B regarding real property—

“(i) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for a first violation; and

“(ii) in an amount not exceeding $220,000 for any subsequent violation; and

“(B) with respect to any other violation of this Act—

“(i) in an amount not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation; and

“(ii) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation.”

(c)
Credit discrimination— Section 108 of such Act (50 U.S.C. App. 518) is amended—
(1)
by striking “Application by” and inserting “(a) Application or receipt.—Application by”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Eligibility—In addition to the protections under subsection (a), an individual who is entitled to any right or protection provided under this Act may not be denied or refused credit or be subject to any other action described under paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) solely by reason of such entitlement.”

(d)
Requirements for lending institutions that are creditors for obligations and liabilities covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act— Section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):

“(d) Lending institution requirements

“(1) Compliance officers—Each lending institution subject to the requirements of this section shall designate an employee of the institution as a compliance officer who is responsible for ensuring the institution’s compliance with this section and for distributing information to servicemembers whose obligations and liabilities are covered by this section.

“(2) Toll-free telephone number—During any fiscal year, a lending institution subject to the requirements of this section that had annual assets for the preceding fiscal year of $10,000,000,000 or more shall maintain a toll-free telephone number and shall make such telephone number available on the primary Internet website of the institution.”

(e)
Pension for certain veterans covered by medicaid plans for services furnished by nursing facilities— Section 5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “November 30, 2016” and inserting “March 1, 2017”.
(f)
Effective date— Section 303B of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as added by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section (other than the amendment made by subsection (e)), shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 557 Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones

(a)
Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons— Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1126 the following new section:

“1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation

“(a) Design and eligibility—A lapel button, to be known as the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the dependent of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days.

“(b) Presentation—The Secretary concerned may authorize the use of appropriated funds to procure dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation to eligible dependents of members.

“(c) Exception to time-period requirement—The 30-day period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the expiration the period.

“(d) License to manufacture and sell lapel buttons—Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this section.

“(e) Combat zone defined—In this section, the term “combat zone” has the meaning given that term in section 112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

“(f) Regulations—The Secretary of Defense shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable.”

(b)
Clerical Amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1126 the following new item:

F Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness

Sec. 561 Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program

Section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) If a secondary educational institution in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau otherwise meets the conditions imposed by subsection (b) on the establishment and maintenance of units of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, the Secretary of a military department may establish and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps at the secondary educational institution even though the secondary educational institution is not a United States secondary educational institution.”

Sec. 562 Improved climate assessments and dissemination and tracking of results

(a)
Improved dissemination of results in chain of command— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the results of command climate assessments are provided to the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of command.
(b)
Performance tracking—
(1)
Evidence of compliance— The Secretary of each military department shall include in the performance evaluations and assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary a designated form where senior commanders can indicate whether the commander has conducted the required climate assessments.
(2)
Effect of failure to conduct assessment— If a commander is found to not have conducted the required climate assessments, the failure shall be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation and be considered a serious factor during consideration for any subsequent promotion.
(c)
Tracking system— The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall develop a system to track whether commanders are conducting command climate assessments.
(d)
Unit compliance reports— Working with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, unit commanders shall gather all the climate assessments from the unit and develop a compliance report that, at a minimum, shall include the following:
(1)
A comprehensive overview of the concerns members of the unit expressed in the climate assessments.
(2)
Data showing how leadership is perceived in the unit.
(3)
A detailed strategic plan on how leadership plans to address the expressed concerns.

Sec. 563 Service-wide 360 assessments

(a)
Adoption of 360-degree approach— The Secretary of each military department shall develop an assessment program modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program, known in this section as the “360-degree approach”.
(b)
Report on inclusion in performance evaluation reports— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of an assessment of the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as part of the performance evaluation reports.
(c)
Individual counseling— The Secretary of each military department shall include individual counseling as part of the performance evaluation process.

Sec. 564 Health welfare inspections

The Secretary of each military department shall conduct health welfare inspections on a monthly basis in order to ensure and maintain security, military readiness, good order, and discipline of all units of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. Results of the Health Welfare Inspections shall be provided to both the commander and senior commander.

Sec. 565 Review of security of military installations, including barracks and multi-family residences

(a)
Review of security measures— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of security measures on United States military installations, specifically with regard to barracks and multi-family residences on military installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents who reside on military installations.
(b)
Elements of study— In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
identify security gaps on military installations; and
(2)
evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24-hour electronic monitoring or placing security personnel at all points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences on military installation.
(c)
Submission of results— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), including an estimate of the costs—
(1)
to eliminate all security gaps identified under subsection (b)(1); and
(2)
to provide 24-hour security monitoring as evaluated under subsection (b)(2).

Sec. 566 Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses

(a)
Improvement of information available to members of the Armed Forces about correlation—
(1)
In general— The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make information on civilian credentialing opportunities available to members of the Armed Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, training of members for military occupational specialties, in order to permit members—
(A)
to evaluate the extent to which such training correlates with the skills and training required in connection with various civilian certifications and licenses; and
(B)
to assess the suitability of such training for obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and licenses.
(2)
Coordination with Transition Goals Plans Success program— Information shall be made available under paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals Plans Success (GPS) program.
(3)
Types of information— The information made available under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(A)
Information on the civilian occupational equivalents of military occupational specialties (MOS).
(B)
Information on civilian license or certification requirements, including examination requirements.
(C)
Information on the availability and opportunities for use of educational benefits available to members of the Armed Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or continuing education that leads to a certification exam in order to provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities.
(4)
Use and adaptation of certain programs— In making information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments may use and adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL) programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force.
(b)
Improvement of access of accredited civilian credentialing agencies to military training content—
(1)
In general— The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable consistent with national security requirements, make available to accredited civilian credentialing agencies that issue certifications or licenses, upon request of such agencies, information such as military course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed.
(2)
Central repository— The actions taken pursuant to paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central repository of information on training and training materials provided members in connection with military occupational specialities that is readily accessible by accredited civilian credentialing agencies described in that paragraph in order to meet requests described in that paragraph.

Sec. 567 Use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses

(a)
Courses under Department of Defense educational assistance authorities—
(1)
In general— Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2015 the following new section:

“2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses

“(a) Limitation on use of assistance—In the case of a member of the armed forces who is enrolled in an educational institution in a State for purposes of obtaining employment in an occupation or profession requiring the approval or licensure of a board or agency of that State, educational assistance specified in subsection (b) may be used by the member for a course offered by the educational institution that is a required element of the curriculum to be satisfied to obtain employment in that occupation or profession only if—

“(1) the successful completion of the curriculum fully qualifies a student to—

“(A) take any examination required for entry into the occupation or profession, including satisfying any State or professionally mandated programmatic and specialized accreditation requirements; and

“(B) be certified or licensed or meet any other academically related pre-conditions that are required for entry into the occupation or profession; and

“(2) in the case of State licensing or professionally mandated requirements for entry into the occupation or profession that require specialized accreditation, the curriculum meets the requirement for specialized accreditation through its accreditation or pre-accreditation by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the Secretary of Education or designated by that State as a reliable authority as to the quality or training offered by the institution in that program.

“(b) Covered educational assistance—The educational assistance specified in this subsection is educational assistance as follows:

“(1) Educational assistance for members of the armed forces under section 2007 and 2015 of this title.

“(2) Educational assistance for persons enlisting for active duty under chapter 106A of this title.

“(3) Educational assistance for members of the armed forces held as captives under section 2183 of this title.

“(4) Educational assistance for members of the Selected Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title.

“(5) Educational assistance for reserve component members supporting contingency operations and other operations under chapter 1607 of this title.

“(6) Such other educational assistance provided members of the armed force under the laws the administered by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretaries of the military departments as the Secretary of Defense shall designate for purposes of this section.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2015 the following new item:
(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on August 1, 2014, and shall apply with respect to courses pursued on or after that date.

Sec. 568 Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members of the Armed Forces

The Secretary of each military department shall carry out tuition assistance programs for members of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary during fiscal year 2014 using an amount not less than the sum of any amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for tuition assistance for members of that Armed Force for fiscal year 2014.

Sec. 569 Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps serving in combat zones

(a)
Provision of internet access requirement— The Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who are deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay or hazardous duty pay is authorized under section 310 or 351 of title 37, United States Code, have reasonable access to the Internet in order to permit the members—
(1)
to engage in video-conferencing and other communication with their families and friends; and
(2)
to enjoy the educational and recreational capabilities of the Internet via websites approved by the Secretary concerned.
(b)
Waiver authority— The Secretary of a military department may waive the requirement imposed by subsection (a) for an area, or for certain time periods in an area, if the Secretary determines that the security environment of the area does not reasonably allow for recreational Internet use.
(c)
No charge for access and use— Internet access and use shall be provided to members under this section without charge.
(d)
Effective date— The requirement imposed by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2014.

Sec. 570 Report on the Troops to Teachers program

Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the Troops to Teachers program that includes each of the following:
(1)
An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a bachelor’s degree admission into the program and whether the program can be strengthened.
(2)
An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an institutional based award for troops to teachers, as long as any such pilot maximizes benefits to soldiers and minimizes administrative and other overhead costs at the participating academic institutions.

Sec. 570A Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members of the Armed Forces

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to Congress a report addressing the following:
(1)
Whether application of the benefits provided under section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) could occur automatically for members of the Armed Forces eligible for the benefits.
(2)
How the Department of Defense would implement the automatic operation of the current prohibition on the accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members, including the Federal agencies with which the Department of Defense would coordinate.
(3)
If the Secretary determines that automatic operation is not feasible, an explanation of the reasons for that determination.

G Defense Dependents’ Education

Sec. 571 Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees

(a)
Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students— Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $20,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b)
Assistance to schools with enrollment changes due to base closures, force structure changes, or force relocations—
(1)
Extension of authority to provide assistance— Section 572(b)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b(b)(4)) is amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.
(2)
Amount of assistance authorized— Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (b) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(c)
Local educational agency defined— In this section, the term local educational agency has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

Sec. 572 Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students

The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit organizations that provide services to improve the academic achievement of military dependent students, including those nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic responsibility of military dependent students and their understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

Sec. 573 Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program

(a)
Crediting of payments— Section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense under this subsection shall be credited to the account designated by the Secretary for the operation of the virtual educational program under this subsection. Payments so credited shall be merged with other funds in the account and shall be available, to the extent provided in advance in appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the same period as other funds in the account.”

(b)
Application of amendment— The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition payments received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, for enrollments authorized by such section, after the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual elementary and secondary education program of the Department of Defense education program.

H Decorations and Awards

Sec. 581 Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or medals

(a)
In general— Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “wears,”; and
(2)
so that subsection (b) reads as follows:

“(b) Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or medals—Whoever, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

(b)
Addition of certain other medals— Section 704(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “If a decoration” and inserting the following:

“(1) In general—If a decoration”

(2)
by inserting “a combat badge,” after “1129 of title 10,”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Combat badge defined—In this subsection, the term “combat badge” means a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, Combat Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Combat Action Medal.”

(c)
Conforming amendment— Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by striking “or (b)”.

Sec. 582 Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces

(a)
Army— Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “medal of honor, distinguished-service cross,” and inserting “distinguished-service cross”.
(b)
Navy and marine corps— Section 6247 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “medal of honor,”.
(c)
Air force— Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “medal of honor, Air Force cross,” and inserting “Air Force Cross”.

Sec. 583 Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal

(a)
Army— Section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “three years” and inserting “five years”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “two years ” and inserting “three years”.
(b)
Air force— Section 8744(b) of such title is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “three years ” and inserting “five years”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “two years ” and inserting “three years”.

Sec. 584 Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements

(a)
Automatic enrollment and furnishing of certificate—
(1)
In general— Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134 the following new section:

“1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll

“(a) Establishment—There shall be in the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating a roll designated as the “Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll”.

“(b) Enrollment—The Secretary concerned shall enter and record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title or section 491 of title 14.

“(c) Issuance of enrollment certificate—Each living person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a certificate of enrollment on the roll.

“(d) Entitlement to special pension; notice to secretary of Veterans Affairs—The Secretary concerned shall deliver to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each certificate of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The copy of the certificate shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay the special pension provided by section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in the certificate.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1134 the following new item:
(b)
Special pension—
(1)
Automatic entitlement— Subsection (a) of section 1562 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “each person” and inserting “each living person”;
(B)
by striking “Honor roll” and inserting “Honor Roll”;
(C)
by striking “subsection (c) of section 1561 of this title” and inserting “subsection (d) of section 1134a of title 10”; and
(D)
by striking “date of application therefor under section 1560 of this title” and inserting “date on which the person’s name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b) of such section”.
(2)
Election to decline special pension— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g)

“(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by notifying the Secretary of such election in writing.

“(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary shall cease payments of special pension to the person.”

(c)
Conforming amendments—
(1)
Repeal of recodified provisions— Sections 1560 and 1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed.
(2)
Clerical amendments— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561.
(d)
Application of amendments— The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 585 Treatment of victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas

(a)
Award of Purple Heart required— The Secretary of the military department concerned shall award the Purple Heart to the members of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded in the attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009.
(b)
Exception— This section shall not apply to a member of the Armed Forces whose death or wound in an attack described in subsection (a) was the result of the willful misconduct of the member.

Sec. 586 Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge

(a)
Authority To award— The Secretary of the Army may award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of the Army Letter 600–05–1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat during which the person personally engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary determines that the person has not been previously recognized in an appropriate manner for such participation.
(b)
Procurement of badge— The Secretary of the Army may make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to carry out this section.

Sec. 587 Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report describing the Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard to the case.

Sec. 588 Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor during the Korean War

(a)
Authorization— Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3144 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army is authorized and requested to award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor referred to in subsection (b) during the Korean War.
(b)
Acts of Valor described— The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser’s on November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police Company, 2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during the Division’s successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon Pass.

Sec. 589 Required gold content for Medal of Honor

(a)
Army—
(1)
Gold content— Section 3741 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “The President” and inserting “(a) Award.—The President”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Gold content—The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.”

(2)
Exception for duplicate medal— Section 3754 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Section 3741(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.”.
(b)
Navy—
(1)
Gold content— Section 6241 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “The President” and inserting “(a) Award.—The President”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Gold content—The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.”

(2)
Exception for duplicate medal— Section 6256 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Section 6241(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.”.
(c)
Air Force—
(1)
Gold content— Section 8741 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “The President” and inserting “(a) Award.—The President”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Gold content—The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.”

(2)
Exception for duplicate medal— Section 8754 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Section 8741(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.”.
(d)
Coast Guard—
(1)
Gold content— Section 491 of title 14, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “The President” and inserting “(a) Award.—The President”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Gold content—The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.”

(2)
Exception for duplicate medal— Section 504 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Section 491(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.”.
(e)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 590 Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations

The Secretary of the Army shall consider the nominations for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for retired Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, Gilbert Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr.

Sec. 590A Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report describing the Army's review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht. The report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard to the case.

Sec. 590B Replacement of military decorations

(a)
Prompt replacement required; annual report— Section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:

“(b) Prompt replacement required—When a request for the replacement of a military decoration is received under this section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this title, the Secretary concerned shall ensure that—

“(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request, including verification of the service record of the recipient of the military decoration, are completed within one year; and

“(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the person requesting the replacement military decoration within 60 days after verification of the service record.

“(c) Annual report—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report regarding compliance by the military departments with the performance standards imposed by subsection (b). Each report shall include—

“(1) for the one-year period covered by the report—

“(A) the average number of days it took to verify the service record and entitlement of members and former members of the armed forces for replacement military decorations;

“(B) the average number of days between receipt of a request and the date on which the replacement military decoration was mailed; and

“(C) the average number of days between verification of a service record and the date on which the replacement military decoration was mailed; and

“(2) an estimate of the funds necessary for the next fiscal year to meet or exceed such performance standards.”

(b)
Plan required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a plan to implement the amendments made by subsection (a), including an estimate of the funds necessary for fiscal year 2015 to meet or exceed the performance standards imposed by such amendments.

Sec. 590C Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War

(a)
Authorization— Subject to subsection (c), notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond the call of duty in the Civil War, as described in subsection (b).
(b)
Acts of valor described— The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the American Civil War.
(c)
Report submission— Subsection (a) shall take effect upon receipt by the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives of the report, as required in House Report 112–705, providing information on the process and materials used by review boards for the consideration of Medal of Honor recommendations for acts of heroism that occurred during the Civil War.

I Other Matters

Sec. 591 Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College

Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(6) The University of North Georgia.”

Sec. 592 Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military Cemeteries

(a)
In general— Chapter 446 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“4727. Cemetery concessions contracts

“(a) Contracts authorized—The Secretary of the Army may enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the provision of transportation, interpretative, or other necessary or appropriate concession services to visitors at the Army National Military Cemeteries.

“(b) Special requirements

“(1) The Secretary of the Army shall establish and include in each concession contract such requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at which services are provided under the contract.

“(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of the gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress.

“(c) Term of contracts

“(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a concession contract may be awarded for a period of not more than 10 years.

“(2)

“(A) If the Secretary of the Army determines that the terms and conditions of a concession contract to be entered into under this section, including any required construction of capital improvements, warrant entering into the contract for a period of greater than 10 years, the Secretary may award the contract for a period of up to 20 years.

“(B) If a concession contract is intended solely for the provision of transportation services, the Secretary may enter into the contract for a period of not more than five years and may extend the period of the contract for one or more successive five-year periods pursuant to an option included in the contract or a modification of the contract. The aggregate period of any such contract, including extensions, may not exceed 10 years.

“(d) Franchise fees—A concession contract shall provide for payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary of the Army. The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of generating revenue for the United States is subordinate to the objectives of honoring the service and sacrifices of the deceased members of the armed forces and of providing necessary and appropriate services for visitors to the Cemeteries at reasonable rates.

“(e) Special account—All franchise fees (and other monetary consideration) collected by the United States under subsection (d) shall be deposited into a special account established in the Treasury of the United States. The funds deposited in such account shall be available for expenditure by the Secretary of the Army, to the extent authorized and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds deposited into the account shall remain available until expended.

“(f) Concession contract defined—In this section, the term “concession contract” means a contract authorized and entered into under this section.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 593 Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues

(a)
Establishment of Commission— There is established the Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues (in this section referred to as the “Commission”).
(b)
Membership—
(1)
Composition— The Commission shall be composed of 10 members, of whom—
(A)
two shall be appointed by the President;
(B)
two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(C)
two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(D)
two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(E)
two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Appointment date— The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. If one or more appointments under a subparagraph of paragraph (1) is not made by such appointment date, the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments not made.
(3)
Expertise— In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in service-connected mental disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), psychiatry, behavioral health, neurology, as well as disciplinary matters and military justice.
(4)
Period of Appointment; Vacancies— Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(5)
Initial Meeting— Not later than 30 days after the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the Commission shall hold its first meeting.
(6)
Meetings— The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair. A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.
(7)
Chair and Vice Chairman— The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
(c)
Study and report—
(1)
Study required— The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of whether—
(A)
the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action adequately address the impact of service-connected mental disorders and TBI on the basis for the disciplinary action; and
(B)
whether the disciplinary mechanisms should be revisited in light of new information regarding the connection between service-connected mental disorders and TBI, behavioral problems, and disciplinary action.
(2)
Considerations— In considering the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action, the Commission shall give particular consideration to evaluating a structure that examines those members diagnosed with or reasonably asserting post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury that have been deployed overseas in support of a contingency operation during the previous 24 months and how that injury or deployment may constitute matters in extenuation that relate to the basis for administrative separation under conditions other than honorable or the overall characterization of service of the member as other than honorable.
(3)
Report— Not later than June 30, 2014, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report containing a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the study required by this subsection, together with its recommendations for such legislation and administrative actions it may consider appropriate in light of the results of the study.
(d)
Powers of the commission—
(1)
Hearings— The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out this section.
(2)
Information From Federal Agencies— The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out this section. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(e)
Commission personnel matters—
(1)
Compensation of Members— All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(2)
Travel Expenses— The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(3)
Staff— The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel from as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission. The staff members should be officers or employees of the United States.
(f)
Termination date— The Commission shall terminate 30 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report.

Sec. 594 Commission on Service to the Nation

(a)
Establishment— There is established a commission to be known as the “Commission on Service to the Nation”.
(b)
Duties—
(1)
Study— The Commission shall carry out a study of the following:
(A)
The effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and conflicts, on members of the Armed Forces, the families of members, and the communities of members.
(B)
The outgoing experience and transition between military and civilian life.
(C)
The gaps between the military and those Americans who do not participate directly in the military community.
(2)
Testimony and research— In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Commission shall—
(A)
hear testimony from all aspects of military and civilian life, including public, private, individual and institutional stakeholders, with personal testimony, expert testimony, academic testimony, as well as testimony from association and community leaders, and other testimony as appropriate;
(B)
hear and accept testimony in an open and public manner, accepting testimony in a wide variety of ways for each hearing, including submissions made through a public internet website, and testimony heard remotely if appropriate;
(C)
retain the records of all hearings and artifacts of testimony for the purposes of historical documentation and research;
(D)
assess the social, mental, and physical effects of war on active members of the Armed Forces, the families of members, and the communities of members and the preparation they receive for transitioning out of the military; and
(E)
assess the existing academic and social science research and analysis on transition from active military to civilian life.
(3)
Recommendations— The Commission shall make recommendations, based on the analyses in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), on how to better—
(A)
support the transition to civilian life of a member of the Armed Forces;
(B)
support the families and communities of the member; and
(C)
better connect the military community and civilians.
(4)
Website— The Commission shall maintain an Internet website available to the public to—
(A)
share the schedule of the Commission;
(B)
notify the public of events;
(C)
accept feedback; and
(D)
post records of events and other information to inform the public in a manner consistent with the mission of the Commission.
(c)
Composition—
(1)
Members— The Commission shall be composed of 15 members appointed as follows:
(A)
Four members appointed by Majority Leader of the Senate, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.
(B)
Four members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(C)
Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the Senate, in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.
(D)
Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Service of the House of Representatives.
(E)
Three members appointed by the President.
(2)
Qualifications— The members of the Commission shall be appointed from among persons who have knowledge and expertise in the following areas:
(A)
The effects of war on members of the Armed Forces, their families, and society.
(B)
The process of transitioning out of the Armed Forces.
(C)
The resources available to members and their families as members transition out of the Armed Forces and into society.
(D)
Personnel benefits, including healthcare and job training, available to members.
(E)
Policy making and policy analysis.
(3)
Service requirement— Not less than one member of the Commission appointed under each of subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1) shall have served in the Armed Forces.
(4)
Duration and vacancies— Members of the Commission shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. A vacancy in the membership of the Commission shall not affect the powers of the Commission, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(5)
Chairman— The President shall designate a member of the Commission to serve as chairman of the Commission.
(6)
Deadline for appointment— The members shall be appointed by not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d)
Procedures—
(1)
Initial meeting— The Commission shall hold its initial meeting not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed.
(2)
Meetings— After the initial meeting under paragraph (1), the Commission shall meet at the call of the chairman.
(3)
Quorum— Four members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.
(4)
Procedure— The Commission shall act by resolution agreed to by a majority of the members of the Commission.
(5)
Panels— The Commission may establish panels composed of less than the full membership of the Commission for the purpose of carrying out the Commission's duties. The actions of each such panel shall be subject to the review and control of the Commission. Any findings and determinations made by such a panel shall not be considered the findings and determinations of the Commission unless approved by the Commission.
(e)
Compensation and staff—
(1)
Pay— Each member of the Commission shall be paid at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without pay in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(2)
Travel expenses— The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(3)
Executive director— The Commission shall appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for an Executive Director in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(4)
Staff— The Executive Director, with the approval of the Commission, may appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for additional personnel as staff of the Commission in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(5)
Detail of government employees— Upon request of the chairman of the Commission, the head of any Federal department or agency may detail, on a nonreimbursable basis, any personnel of that department or agency to the Commission to assist it in carrying out its duties.
(f)
Powers—
(1)
Hearings— For the purpose of carrying out this Act, the Commission (or on the authority of the Commission, any subcommittee or member) may hold such hearings and forums, and sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission shall hold not less than one hearing in each State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa.
(2)
Information from Federal agencies— The Commission, or designated staff member, may secure directly from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable it to carry out this Act. Upon request of the chairman of the Commission, the chairman of any subcommittee created by a majority of the Commission, or any member designated by a majority of the Commission, the head of that department or agency shall furnish that information to the Commission.
(3)
Miscellaneous administrative and support services— The Secretary of Defense shall furnish the Commission, on a reimbursable basis, any administrative and support services requested by the Commission.
(4)
Procurement of temporary and intermittent services— The chairman of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
(5)
Gifts— The Commission may accept, use, and dispose of gifts, bequests, or devises of services or property, both real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Commission. Gifts, bequests, or devises of money and proceeds from sales of other property received as gifts, bequests, or devises shall be deposited in the Treasury and shall be available for disbursement upon order of the chairman, vice chairman, or designee.
(g)
Reports—
(1)
Initial report— Not later than 90 days after the initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and release to the public, a report setting forth—
(A)
a strategic plan for the work of the Commission;
(B)
a discussion of the activities of the Commission; and
(C)
any initial findings of the Commission.
(2)
Final report— Not later than 18 months after the initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and release to the public, a final report. Such report shall include any recommendations developed under subsection (b)(3) that the Commission determines appropriate, including any recommended legislation, policies, regulations, directives, and practices.
(h)
Termination— The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the final report is submitted under subsection (g)(2).

Sec. 595 Electronic tracking of certain reserve duty

The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty service performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such title.

Sec. 596 Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans

Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the military salute in the manner provided for persons in uniform.”.

Sec. 597 Provision of service records

(a)
In general— In accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of each member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format.
(b)
Timeline— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the covered records of members are made available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as follows:
(1)
With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who was discharged or released from the Armed Forces during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 120 days after the date of such discharge or release.
(2)
With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who is discharged or released from the Armed Forces on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 90 days after the date of such discharge or release.
(c)
Certification— For each member of the Armed Forces whose covered records are made available under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a letter certifying that—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense thoroughly reviewed the records of the member;
(2)
the information provided in the covered records of such member is complete as of the date of the letter;
(3)
no other information that should be included in such covered records exist as of such date; and
(4)
if other information is later discovered—
(A)
such other information will be added to such covered records; and
(B)
the Secretary of Defense will notify the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of such addition.
(d)
Sharing of protected health information— For purposes of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note), making medical records available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection (a) shall be treated as a permitted disclosure.
(e)
Currently available records— The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall ensure that the covered records of members of the Armed Forces that are available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act are made electronically accessible and available in real-time to the Veterans Benefits Administration.
(f)
Covered records defined— In this section, the term covered records means, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces—
(1)
service treatment records;
(2)
accompanying personal records;
(3)
relevant unit records; and
(4)
medical records created by reason of treatment or services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 598 Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
Commencing August 26, 1946, though late February 1947 the United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program Task Force 68, codenamed “Operation Highjump” initiated and undertook the largest ever-to-this-date exploration of the Antarctic continent.
(2)
The primary mission of the Task Force 68 organized by Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. USN, (Ret) and led by Rear Admiral Richard H. Cruzen, USN, was to do the following:
(A)
Establish the Antarctic research base Little America IV.
(B)
In the defense of the United States of America from possible hostile aggression from abroad—to train personnel test equipment, develop techniques for establishing, maintaining and utilizing air bases on ice, with applicability comparable to interior Greenland, where conditions are similar to those of the Antarctic.
(C)
Map and photograph a full two-thirds of the Antarctic Continent during the classified, hazardous duty/volunteer-only operation involving 4700 sailors, 23 aircraft and 13 ships including the first submarine the U.S.S. Sennet, and the aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Philippine Sea, brought to the edge of the ice pack to launch (6) Navy ski-equipped, rocket-assisted R4Ds.
(D)
Consolidate and extend United States sovereignty over the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent.
(E)
Determine the feasibility of establishing, maintaining and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating possible base sites.
(3)
While on a hazardous duty/all volunteer mission vital to the interests of National Security and while over the eastern Antarctica coastline known as the Phantom Coast, the PBM–5 Martin Mariner “Flying Boat”“George 1” entered a whiteout over Thurston Island. As the pilot attempted to climb, the aircraft grazed the glacier’s ridgeline and exploded within 5 seconds instantly killing Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Navigator and Wendell “Bud” Hendersin, Aviation Machinists Mate 1st Class while Frederick Williams, Aviation Radioman 1st Class died several hours later. Six other crewmen survived including the Captain of the “George 1’s” seaplane tender U.S.S. Pine Island.
(4)
The bodies of the dead were protected from the desecration of Antarctic scavenging birds (Skuas) by the surviving crew wrapping the bodies and temporarily burying the men under the starboard wing engine nacelle.
(5)
Rescue requirements of the “George–1” survivors forced the abandonment of their crewmates’ bodies.
(6)
Conditions prior to the departure of Task Force 68 precluded a return to the area to the recover the bodies.
(7)
For nearly 60 years Navy promised the families that they would recover the men: “If the safety, logistical, and operational prerequisites allow a mission in the future, every effort will be made to bring our sailors home.”.
(8)
The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command twice offered to recover the bodies of this crew for Navy.
(9)
A 2004 NASA ground penetrating radar overflight commissioned by Navy relocated the crash site three miles from its crash position.
(10)
The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command offered to underwrite the cost of an aerial ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey of the crash site area by NASA.
(11)
The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command studied the recovery with the recognized recovery authorities and national scientists and determined that the recovery is only “medium risk”.
(12)
National Science Foundation and scientists from the University of Texas, Austin, regularly visit the island.
(13)
The crash site is classified as a “perishable site”, meaning a glacier that will calve into the Bellingshausen Sea.
(14)
The National Science Foundation maintains a presence in area—of the Pine Island Glacier.
(15)
The National Science Foundation Director of Polar Operations will assist and provide assets for the recovery upon the request of Congress.
(16)
The United States Coast Guard is presently pursuing the recovery of 3 WWII air crewmen from similar circumstances in Greenland.
(17)
On Memorial Day, May 25, 2009, President Barack Obama declared: “* * * the support of our veterans is a sacred trust * * * we need to serve them as they have served us * * * that means bringing home all our POWs and MIAs * * *”.
(18)
The policies and laws of the United States of America require that our armed service personnel be repatriated.
(19)
The fullest possible accounting of United States fallen military personnel means repatriating living American POWs and MIAs, accounting for, identifying, and recovering the remains of military personnel who were killed in the line of duty, or providing convincing evidence as to why such a repatriation, accounting, identification, or recovery is not possible.
(20)
It is the responsibility of the Federal Government to return to the United States for proper burial and respect all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty who lie in lost graves.
(b)
Sense of congress— In light of the findings under subsection (a), Congress—
(1)
reaffirms its support for the recovery and return to the United States, the remains and bodies of all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, and for the efforts by the Joint POW-MIA Accounting Command to recover the remains of members of the Armed Forces from all wars, conflicts and missions;
(2)
recognizes the courage and sacrifice of all members of the Armed Forces who participated in Operation Highjump and all missions vital to the national security of the United States of America;
(3)
acknowledges the dedicated research and efforts by the US Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, the Fallen American Veterans Foundation and all persons and organizations to identify, locate, and advocate for, from their temporary Antarctic grave, the recovery of the well-preserved frozen bodies of Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Naval Aviator, Frederick Williams, Aviation Machinist’s Mate 1ST Class, Wendell Hendersin, Aviation Radioman 1ST Class of the “George 1” explosion and crash; and
(4)
encourages the Department of Defense to review the facts, research and to pursue new efforts to undertake all feasible efforts to recover, identify, and return the well-preserved frozen bodies of the “George 1” crew from Antarctica’s Thurston Island.

Sec. 599 Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units

Section 974 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

“(d) Performances funded by private donation—Notwithstanding section 2601(c) of this title, any gift made to the Secretary of Defense under section 2601 on the condition that such gift be used for the benefit of a military musical unit shall be credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds for such military musical unit. Any amount so credited shall be merged with amounts in the appropriation or account to which credited, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation or account.”

VI Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits

A Pay and Allowances

Sec. 601 Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

Sec. 602 Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay

Section 204(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the first sentence, by striking “date when he appears at the place of company rendezvous” and inserting “date on which the member, in person or by authorized telephonic or electronic means, contacts the member’s unit”; and
(2)
by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “However, this subsection does not authorize any expenditure before the member makes authorized contact that is not authorized by law to be paid after such authorized contact.”.

B Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

Sec. 611 One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus.
(2)
Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3)
Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4)
Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5)
Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6)
Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(7)
Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance.
(8)
Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

Sec. 612 One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals

(a)
Title 10 authorities— The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program.
(2)
Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.
(b)
Title 37 authorities— The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.
(2)
Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses.
(3)
Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4)
Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
(5)
Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers.
(6)
Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers.
(7)
Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8)
Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

Sec. 613 One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2)
Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus.
(3)
Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus.

Sec. 614 One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members.
(2)
Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers.
(3)
Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4)
Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5)
Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6)
Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(7)
Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay.
(8)
Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus.
(9)
Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

Sec. 615 One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”:
(1)
Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus.
(2)
Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3)
Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members.
(4)
Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5)
Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.
(6)
Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.
(7)
Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between armed forces.
(8)
Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates.

Sec. 616 One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency

Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

Sec. 617 Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps

(a)
Bonus authorized— Chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following new section:

“336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps

“(a) Contracting bonus authorized—The Secretary concerned may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or midshipman enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps who executes a written agreement described in subsection (c).

“(b) Amount of bonus—The amount of a bonus under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000.

“(c) Agreement—A written agreement referred to in subsection (a) is a written agreement by the cadet or midshipman—

“(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10;

“(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of title 10;

“(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer of the armed forces; and

“(4) to serve on active duty.

“(d) Payment method—Upon acceptance of a written agreement under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, the total amount of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed. The agreement shall specify when the bonus will be paid and whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum or in installments.

“(e) Repayment—A person who, having received all or part of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms of the written agreement required by such subsection for receipt of the bonus shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 of this title.

“(f) Regulations—The Secretary concerned shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section.

“(g) Termination of authority—No agreement under this section may be entered into after December 31, 2015.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 335 the following new item:

C Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional Benefits

Sec. 621 Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents of certain members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

(a)
In general— Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1059 the following new section:

“1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses: transitional compensation; commissary and exchange benefits

“(a) Authority To pay compensation—The Secretary of Defense, with respect to the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy), and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, may each establish a program under which the Secretary may pay monthly transitional compensation in accordance with this section to dependents or former dependents of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) who is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.

“(b) Members and punitive actions covered—This section applies in the case of a member of the armed forces who, after completing more than 20 years of active service or more than 20 years of service computed under section 12732 of this title—

“(1) is convicted by court-martial of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice);

“(2) is separated from active duty pursuant to the sentence of the court-martial; and

“(3) forfeits all pay and allowances pursuant to the sentence of the court-martial.

“(c) Recipient of payments

“(1) In the case of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b), the Secretary may pay compensation under this section to dependents or former dependents of the member as follows:

“(A) If the member was married at the time of the commission of the offense resulting in separation from the armed forces, such compensation may be paid to the spouse or former spouse to whom the member was married at that time, including an amount for each, if any, dependent child of the member who resides in the same household as that spouse or former spouse.

“(B) If there is a spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible for compensation under this section and if there is a dependent child of the member who does not reside in the same household as that spouse or former spouse, compensation under this section may be paid to each such dependent child of the member who does not reside in that household.

“(C) If there is no spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible under this section, compensation under this section may be paid to the dependent children of the member.

“(2) A dependent or former dependent of a member described in subsection (b) is not eligible for transitional compensation under this section if the Secretary concerned determines (under regulations prescribed under subsection (g)) that the dependent or former dependent was an active participant in the conduct constituting the offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) for which the member was convicted and separated from the armed forces.

“(d) Commencement and duration of payment

“(1) If provided under this section, the payment of transitional compensation under this section shall commence—

“(A) as of the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged if the sentence, as adjudged, includes—

“(i) a dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge; and

“(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances; or

“(B) if there is a pretrial agreement that provides for disapproval or suspension of the dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay and allowances, as of the date of the approval of the court-martial sentence by the person acting under section 860(c) of this title (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) if the sentence, as approved, includes—

“(i) an unsuspended dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge; and

“(ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

“(2) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e), paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (g), and subsections (f) and (h) of section 1059 of this title shall apply in determining—

“(A) the amount of transitional compensation to be paid under this section;

“(B) the period for which such compensation may be paid; and

“(C) the circumstances under which the payment of such compensation may or will cease.

“(e) Commissary and exchange benefits—A dependent or former dependent who receives transitional compensation under this section shall, while receiving such payments, be entitled to use commissary and exchange stores in the same manner as provided in subsection (j) of section 1059 of this title.

“(f) Coordination of benefits—The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section and section 1059 or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive.

“(g) Regulations—If the Secretary of Defense (or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) establishes a program to provide transitional compensation under this section, that Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out the program.

“(h) Dependent child defined—In this section, the term dependent child, with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces referred to in subsection (b), has the meaning given such term in subsection (l) of section 1059 of this title, except that status as a dependent child shall be determined as of the date on which the member described in subsection (b) is convicted of the offense concerned.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1059 the following new item:
(c)
Conforming amendment— Subsection (i) of section 1059 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(i) Coordination of benefits—The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section and section 1059a or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059a, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive.”

Sec. 622 Prevention of retired pay inversion for members whose retired pay is computed using high-three average

(a)
Clarification of rule for members who became members on or after September 8, 1980— Section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the monthly retired pay of a member or a former member of an armed force” and inserting the following:

“(A) Members with retired pay computed using final basic pay—The monthly retired pay of a member or former member of an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and”

(2)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(B) Members with retired pay computed using high-three—Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay of a member or former member of an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, may not be less, on the date on which the member or former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired pay to which the member or former member would be entitled on that date if the member or former member had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay under this section. However, in the case of a member or former member whose retired pay is computed subject to section 1407(f) of this title, subparagraph (A) (rather than the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as if the member or former member first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only with respect to a calculation as of the date on which the member or former member first became entitled to retired pay.”

(b)
Applicability— Subparagraph (B) of section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer pay of any member or former member of an Armed Force who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of the date on which the member first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay.

D Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations

Sec. 631 Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals

Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “take or fail to take” and inserting “take, threaten to take, or fail to take”.

Sec. 632 Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems

(a)
Improved purchasing efforts— Section 2481(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3)

“(A) The governing body established pursuant to paragraph (2) shall endeavor to increase the purchase for resale at commissary stores and exchange stores of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials.

“(B) As part of its efforts under subparagraph (A), the governing body shall develop—

“(i) guidelines for the identification of fresh meat, poultry, seafood, and fish, fresh produce, and other products raised or produced through sustainable methods; and

“(ii) goals, applicable to all commissary stores and exchange stores world-wide, to maximize, to the maximum extent practical, the purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials by September 30, 2018.”

(b)
Deadline for establishment and guidelines— The initial guidelines required by paragraph (3)(B)(i) of section 2481(c) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall be issued not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 633 Correction of obsolete references to certain nonappropriated fund instrumentalities

Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service, Navy Ship’s Stores Ashore” and inserting “Navy Ships Stores Program”.

Sec. 634 Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh

(a)
Special procurement guidance for garments manufactured in Bangladesh— The senior official of the Department of Defense designated pursuant to section 2481(c) to oversee the defense commissary system and the exchange store system shall require, consistent with applicable international agreements, that the exchange store system—
(1)
for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh for the private label brands of the exchange store system, becomes a signatory of or otherwise complies with applicable requirements set forth in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh;
(2)
for the purchase of licensed apparel manufactured in Bangladesh, gives a preference to licensees that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh; and
(3)
for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh from retail suppliers, gives a preference to retail suppliers that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh.
(b)
Notice of exceptions— If any garments manufactured in Bangladesh are purchased from suppliers that are not signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, the Department of Defense official referred to in subsection (a) shall notify Congress of the purchase and the reasons therefor.
(c)
Effective date— The requirements imposed by this section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act or as soon after that date as the Secretary of Defense determines to be practicable so as to avoid disruption in garment supplies for the exchange store system.

E Other Matters

Sec. 641 Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human remains retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation

(a)
Disposition of remains of persons whose death is investigated by the armed forces medical examiner—
(1)
Covered decedents— Section 1481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.”

(2)
Authorized expenses relating to care and disposition of remains— Section 1482 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g)

“(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but for the retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title. The Secretary concerned shall pay all other expenses authorized to be paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be credited to appropriations available at the time of reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.

“(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the remains that were retained for the forensic pathology investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation of those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under subsection (a)(8).

“(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under subsection (a)(8), whether or not on a reimbursable basis.”

(b)
Clarification of coverage of inurnment— Section 1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting “or inurnment” after “Interment”.
(c)
Technical amendment— Section 1482(f) of such title is amended in the third sentence by striking “this subsection” and inserting “this section”.

Sec. 642 Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the reserve components as veterans

(a)
Veteran status—
(1)
In general— Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new section:

“107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components

“Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular service shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason of this section.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 107 the following new item:
(b)
Clarification regarding benefits— No person may receive any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of section 107A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).

Sec. 643 Survey of military pay and benefits preferences

(a)
Survey required— The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces regarding military pay and benefits.
(b)
Content of survey— A survey under this section shall be conducted for the purpose of soliciting information on the following:
(1)
The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the following forms of compensation relative to one another:
(A)
Basic pay.
(B)
Allowances for housing and subsistence.
(C)
Bonuses and special pays.
(D)
Dependent healthcare benefits.
(E)
Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old.
(F)
Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees.
(G)
Retirement pay.
(2)
How the members value different levels of pay or benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles on the value of benefits.
(3)
Any other issues related to military pay and benefits as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(4)
How information collected pursuant to a previous paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and other factors the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(c)
Submission of results— Upon the completion of a survey conducted under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report containing the results of the survey, including both the analyses and the raw data collected.

Sec. 644 Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total

(a)
Availability of transportation— Section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 622 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):

“(f) Special priority for certain disabled veterans

“(1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide, at no additional cost to the Department of Defense and with no aircraft modification, transportation on scheduled and unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total.

“(2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing space-available transportation priorities under the travel program, the Secretary shall provide transportation under paragraph (1) on the same basis as such transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay.

“(3) The requirement to provide transportation on Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on the priority basis described in paragraph (2) to veterans covered by this subsection applies whether or not the travel program is established under this section.

“(4) In this subsection, the terms veteran and service-connected have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 38.”

(b)
Effective date— Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

VII Health Care Provisions

A Improvements to Health Benefits

Sec. 701 Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces

(a)
In general— Section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:

“(B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member is deployed.”

(2)
in subsection (c)(1)(A)—
(A)
in clause (i), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;
(B)
by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
(C)
by inserting after clause (i) the following:

“(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose responsibilities include providing unit health care services if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and”

(b)
Conforming amendment— Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “subparagraph (B) and (C)” and inserting “subparagraph (C) and (D)”.

Sec. 702 Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces

(a)
In general— Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the following new section:

“1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the armed forces

“(a) In general—The Secretary of Defense shall provide periodic, person-to-person mental health assessments to each member of the armed forces serving on active duty.

“(b) Frequency—The Secretary shall determine the frequency of the mental health assessments provided under subsection (a).

“(c) Elements

“(1) The mental health assessments provided under subsection (a) shall meet the requirements for mental health assessments as described in section 1074m(c)(1) of this title.

“(2) The Secretary may treat health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under sections 1074f and 1074m of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section.

“(d) Sharing of information—Section 1074m(e) of this title, regarding the sharing of information with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall apply to mental health assessments provided under subsection (a).

“(e) Regulations—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074m the following new item:

Sec. 703 Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under TRICARE

(a)
In general— Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g)

“(1) Subject to paragraph (3)(A), in providing health care under subsection (a), the treatment of developmental disabilities (as defined by section 102(8) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))), including autism spectrum disorder, shall include behavioral health treatment, including applied behavior analysis, when prescribed by a physician.

“(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that—

“(A) except as provided by subparagraph (B), a person who is authorized to provide behavioral health treatment is licensed or certified by a State or accredited national certification board; and

“(B) applied behavior analysis or other behavioral health treatment may be provided by an employee, contractor, or trainee of a person described in subparagraph (A) if the employee, contractor, or trainee meets minimum qualifications, training, and supervision requirements as set forth by the Secretary.

“(3)

“(A) This subsection shall not apply to—

“(i) a medicare eligible beneficiary (as defined in section 1111(b) of this title); or

“(ii) a covered beneficiary who is a beneficiary by reason of being a retired member of the Coast Guard, the Commissioned Corp of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Commissioned Corp of the Public Health Service, or by being a dependent of such a retired member.

“(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (A), nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the benefits otherwise provided to a covered beneficiary under—

“(i) this chapter;

“(ii) title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.); or

“(iii) any other law.”

(b)
Funding—
(1)
Increase— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by $60,000,000.
(2)
Offset— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 280) is hereby reduced by $60,000,000.

Sec. 704 Extension of Transitional Assistance Management Program

(a)
Telemedicine— In carrying out the Transitional Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense shall extend the coverage of such program to individuals by an additional 180 days for treatment provided through telemedicine.
(b)
Mental health care and behavioral services—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall extend the coverage of the Transitional Assistance Management Program for covered treatment to covered individuals for a period determined necessary by a health care professional treating the covered individual.
(2)
Definitions— In this subsection:
(A)
The term “covered individual” means an individual who—
(i)
during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled in the Transitional Assistance Management Program, received any mental health care treatment or covered treatment; or
(ii)
during the one-year period preceding separation or discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental health care treatment.
(B)
The term “covered treatment” means behavioral services provided through telemedicine.
(3)
Sunset— The authority of the Secretary to carry out paragraph (1) shall terminate on December 31, 2018, if the Secretary determines that by that date the suicide rates for both members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and for members of a reserve component are 50 percent less than such rates as of December 31, 2012.
(c)
Telemedicine defined— In this section, the term “telemedicine” means the use by a health care provider of telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis or treatment of a patient's medical condition, including for behavioral services.

Sec. 705 Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of service members with urotrauma

(a)
Comprehensive policy required—
(1)
In general— Not later than January 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management, and transition of recovering service members with urotrauma.
(2)
Scope of policy— The policy shall cover each of the following:
(A)
The care and management of the specific needs of service members who are urotrauma patients, including eligibility for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program pursuant to the Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(B)
The return of service members who have recovered to active duty when appropriate.
(C)
The transition of recovering service members from receipt of care and services through the Department of Defense to receipt of care and services through the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(3)
Consultation— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall develop the policy in consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government, with representatives of military service organizations representing the interests of service members who are urotrauma patients and with appropriate nongovernmental organizations having an expertise in matters relating to the policy.
(b)
Report— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to Congress a report that includes a review identifying and options for responding to gaps in the care of service members who are urotrauma patients.

B Health Care Administration

Sec. 711 Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime

Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1816) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2)
by inserting the following new subsection:

“(b) Access to TRICARE Prime

“(1) One-time election—Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, may make a one-time election to continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based on the location in which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary may continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so long as the beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code as the ZIP Code in which the beneficiary resided at the time of such election.

“(2) Enrollment in TRICARE Standard—If an affected eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A).

“(3) Residence at time of election—An affected eligible beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does not reside in a ZIP code that is in a region described in subsection (c)(1)(B).”

Sec. 712 Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities

Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “Secretary of Defense” and inserting “Secretary concerned”;
(2)
in subsection (b)—
(A)
by striking “Secretary shall” and inserting “Secretary concerned shall”;
(B)
in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting “if the Secretary establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense” before the semicolon; and
(C)
in paragraph (3), by inserting “or the military department concerned” after “the Department of Defense”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Secretary concerned defined—In this section, the term “Secretary concerned” means—

“(1) the Secretary of a military department; or

“(2) the Secretary of Defense.”

Sec. 713 Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health record program

(a)
Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement or research, development, test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense for the integrated electronic health record program, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan of the Secretary to proceed with such program.
(b)
Matters included— The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A description of the key performance requirements for the integrated electronic health record program capability.
(2)
An analysis of alternatives for how to acquire and implement an integrated electronic health record capability that meets such requirements.
(3)
An assessment of the budgetary resources and timeline required for each of the evaluated alternatives.
(4)
A recommendation by the Secretary with respect to the alternative preferred by the Secretary.

Sec. 714 Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities

(a)
Pilot program—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry out a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10, United States Code, from a third-party payer for charges for health care services incurred by the United States at a military medical treatment facility.
(2)
Processes described— The processes described in this paragraph are revenue-cycle management processes, including cash-flow management and accounts-receivable processes.
(b)
Requirements— In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall—
(1)
identify and analyze the best practice option, including commercial best practices, with respect to the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in nonmilitary health care facilities; and
(2)
conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable results of the pilot program, including an analysis of—
(A)
the different processes used in the pilot program;
(B)
the amount of third-party collections that resulted from such processes;
(C)
the cost to implement and sustain such processes; and
(D)
any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate to assess the pilot program.
(c)
Locations— The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1)—
(1)
at military installations that have a military medical treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient capabilities;
(2)
at a number of such installations at different military departments that the Secretary determines sufficient to fully assess the results of the pilot program.
(d)
Duration— The Secretary shall commence the pilot program under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry out such program for three years.
(e)
Report— Not later than 180 days after completing the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the program, including—
(1)
a comparison of—
(A)
the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that were used in the military medical treatment facilities participating in the program; and
(B)
the third-party collection processes used by military medical treatment facilities not included in the program;
(2)
a cost analysis of implementing the processes described in subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military medical treatment facilities; and
(3)
an assessment of the program, including any recommendations to improve third-party collections.
(f)
Additional report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the methods, as of the date of the report, employed by the military departments to collect charges from third-party payers incurred at military medical treatment facilities, including specific data with respect to the dollar amount of third-party collections that resulted from each method currently being used throughout the military departments. The Secretary shall take into account the results of such report in evaluating the results of the pilot program under subsection (a)(1).

C Other Matters

Sec. 721 Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the reserve components

(a)
In general— Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget information

“The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the documentation that supports the President’s annual budget for the Department of Defense, a budget justification display with respect to embedded mental health providers within each reserve component, including the amount requested for each such component.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 722 Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities

Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (B)—
(A)
by inserting “, or any other nonprofit entity” after “Military Medicine”; and
(B)
by inserting “, or nonprofit entity,” after “such Foundation”; and
(2)
in subparagraph (C)—
(A)
by inserting “, or any other nonprofit entity,” after “Military Medicine”; and
(B)
by inserting “, or nonprofit entity,” after “such foundation”.

Sec. 723 Mental health support for military personnel and families

The Secretary of Defense may carry out collaborative programs to—
(1)
respond to the escalating suicide rates and combat stress related arrest rates of members of the Armed Forces;
(2)
train active duty members to recognize and respond to combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction, risk-taking behaviors, and family violence; and
(3)
determine the effectiveness of the efforts of the Department of Defense in reducing suicide rates of members of the Armed Forces.

Sec. 724 Research regarding hydrocephalus

In conducting the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program, the Secretary of Defense may consider selecting medical research projects relating to hydrocephalus.

Sec. 725 Traumatic brain injury research

The Secretary of Defense shall carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including activities regarding drug development to halt neurodegeneration following traumatic brain injury.

Sec. 726 Data sharing with State adjutant generals to facilitate suicide prevention efforts

Upon the request of any adjutant general of a State, the Secretary of Defense shall share the contact information of members of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees who reside in the State of such adjutant general for the purpose of conducting suicide prevention outreach efforts.

Sec. 727 Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast cancer

The Office of Health of the Department of Defense shall work in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health to—
(1)
identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer; and
(2)
provide information useful in biomarker selection, drug discovery, and clinical trials design that will enable both—
(A)
triple negative breast cancer patients to be identified earlier in the progression of their disease; and
(B)
the development of multiple targeted therapies for the disease.

Sec. 728 Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the Armed Forces and their families

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow of qualified counselors to meet the long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces and their families for counselors; and
(2)
the plan should include the participation of accredited schools and universities, health care providers, professional counselors, family service or support centers, chaplains, and other appropriate resources of the Department of Defense.

Sec. 729 Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in Department of Defense centers of excellence

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate a report on the centers of excellence established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). Such report shall include each of the following:
(1)
The amount of resources that have been obligated by Department of Veterans Affairs in support of each of the centers since the dates on which they were established, including the amount of personnel, time, money, and function provided in support of the centers.
(2)
An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary expects the Department to dedicate to each of the centers during each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018.
(3)
A description of the role of the Department within each of the centers.

Sec. 730 Preliminary mental health assessments

Before any individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is commissioned as an officer in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the individual with a mental health assessment. The Secretary shall use such results as a baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations, including such examinations provided under sections 1074f and 1074m of title 10, United States Code, and section 1074n of such title, as added by section 702.

Sec. 731 Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
section 739(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1822) requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan to Congress to improve the coordination and integration of the programs of the Department of Defense that address traumatic brain injury and the psychological health of members of the Armed Forces not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of such Act;
(2)
the requirement to submit the plan is still in effect and the contents of the plan are still important; and
(3)
the Secretary of Defense should deliver the report within the required time frame.

Sec. 732 Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify, refer, and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to members of the Armed Forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the date in June 2010 on which the memorandum regarding using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury took effect.

Sec. 733 Pilot program for investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder

(a)
Process— The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a five-year pilot program under which the Secretary shall establish a process through which the Secretary shall provide payment for investigational treatments (including diagnostic testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder received by members of the Armed Forces in health care facilities other than military treatment facilities. Such process shall provide that payment be made directly to the health care facility furnishing the treatment.
(b)
Conditions for approval— The approval by the Secretary for payment for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1)
Any drug or device used in the treatment must be approved or cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for any purpose and its use must comply with rules of the Food and Drug Administration applicable to investigational new drugs or investigational devices.
(2)
The treatment must be approved by the Secretary following approval by an institutional review board operating in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(3)
The patient receiving the treatment must demonstrate an improvement under criteria approved by the Secretary, as a result of the treatment on one or more of the following:
(A)
Standardized independent pre-treatment and post-treatment neuropsychological testing.
(B)
Accepted survey instruments including, such instruments that look at quality of life.
(C)
Neurological imaging.
(D)
Clinical examination.
(4)
The patient receiving the treatment must be receiving the treatment voluntarily and based on informed consent.
(5)
The patient receiving the treatment may not be a retired member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to benefits under part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
(c)
Additional restrictions authorized— The Secretary may establish additional restrictions or conditions for reimbursement as the Secretary determines appropriate to ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate fiscal management, and the validity of the research results.
(d)
Authority— The Secretary shall make payments under this section for treatments received by members of the Armed Forces using the authority in subsection (c)(1) of section 1074 of title 10, United States Code.
(e)
Amount— A payment under this section shall be made at the equivalent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement rate in effect for appropriate treatment codes for the State or territory in which the treatment is received. If no such rate is in effect, payment shall be made on a cost-reimbursement basis, as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(f)
Data collection and availability—
(1)
In general— The Secretary shall develop and maintain a database containing data from each patient case involving the use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and that any use of the database or disclosures of such data are limited to such use and disclosures permitted by law and applicable regulations.
(2)
Publication of qualified institutional review board studies— The Secretary shall ensure that an Internet website of the Department of Defense includes a list of all civilian institutional review board studies that have received a payment under this section.
(g)
Assistance for members to obtain treatment—
(1)
Assignment to temporary duty— The Secretary of a military department may assign a member of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to temporary duty or allow the member a permissive temporary duty in order to permit the member to receive treatment for traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder, for which payments shall be made under subsection (a), at a location beyond reasonable commuting distance of the permanent duty station of the member.
(2)
Per diem— A member who is away from the permanent station of the member may be paid a per diem in lieu of subsistence in an amount not more than the amount to which the member would be entitled if the member were performing travel in connection with a temporary duty assignment.
(3)
Gift rule waiver— The Secretary of Defense may waive any rule of the Department of Defense regarding ethics or the receipt of gifts with respect to any assistance provided to a member of the Armed Forces for travel or per diem expenses incidental to receiving treatment under this section.
(h)
Memoranda of understanding— The Secretary shall enter into memoranda of understandings with civilian institutions for the purpose of providing members of the Armed Forces with treatment carried out by civilian health care practitioners under treatment—
(1)
approved by and under the oversight of civilian institutional review boards; and
(2)
that would qualify for payment under this section.
(i)
Outreach— The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to notify members of the Armed Forces of the opportunity to receive treatment pursuant to this section.
(j)
Report to congress— Not later than 30 days after the last day of each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to make payments under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress an annual report on the implementation of this section and any available results on investigational treatment studies authorized under this section.
(k)
Termination— The authority to make a payment under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(l)
Authorization of appropriations— There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to make payments under this section.
(m)
Funding increase and offsetting reduction—
(1)
In general— Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, to carry out this section during fiscal year 2014—
(A)
the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby increased by $10,000,000, with the amount of the increase allocated to the Defense Health Program, as set forth in the table under section 4501, to carry out this section; and
(B)
the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby reduced by $10,000,000, with the amount of the reduction to be derived from Line 280, Office of the Secretary of Defense as set forth in the table under section 4301.
(2)
Merit-based or competitive decisions— A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to in paragraph (1)(A) with or to a specific entity shall—
(A)
be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k), 2361, and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and
(B)
comply with other applicable provisions of law.

Sec. 734 Integrated Electronic Health Record of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
despite repeated attempts at cooperation over the past 20 years, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution that allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical health care data;
(2)
the recent decision by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to abandon their earlier agreement and pursue separate paths to integration jeopardizes the stated goal of providing “a patient-centered health care system that delivers excellent quality, access, satisfaction, and value, consistently across the Departments”;
(3)
despite the repeated concerns and objections of the congressional committees of jurisdiction, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs seem to be on a continued path to fail in achieving the goal of creating a seamless health record that integrates data across the Departments; and
(4)
the President should make the necessary leadership changes to assure timely completion of this requirement.
(b)
Implementation— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall—
(1)
implement an integrated electronic health record to be used by each of the Secretaries; and
(2)
deploy such record by not later than October 1, 2016.
(c)
Design principles— The integrated electronic health record established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the following principles:
(1)
To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such record shall be based on objectives, activities, and milestones established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2013–2015, including any requirements, definition, documents, or analyses previously developed to satisfy said Joint Strategic Plan.
(2)
Principles with respect to open architecture standards, including—
(A)
modular designs based on standards with loose coupling and high cohesion that allow for independent acquisition of system components;
(B)
if existing national standards do not exist as of the date on which the record is being established, the Secretaries shall agree upon and adopt a standard for purposes of the record until such time as national standards are established;
(C)
enterprise investment strategies that maximize reuse of proven system designs;
(D)
implementation of aggressive life-cycle sustainment planning that uses proven technology insertion strategies and product upgrade techniques;
(E)
enforcement of system design transparency, continuous design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews that include government, academia, and industry; and
(F)
strategies for data-use rights to ensure a level competitive playing field and access to alternative solutions and sources across the life-cycle of the program.
(3)
By the point of full deployment decision, such record must be at a generation 3 level or better for a health information technology system.
(d)
Program plan— Not later than January 31, 2014, the Secretaries shall jointly develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a program plan for the oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health record program established under this section. This plan shall include—
(1)
program objectives;
(2)
organization;
(3)
responsibilities of the Departments;
(4)
technical system requirements;
(5)
milestones, including a schedule for industry competitions for capabilities needed to satisfy the technical system requirements;
(6)
technical system standards being adopted by the program;
(7)
outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the performance and effectiveness of the program; and
(8)
level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017.
(e)
Assessment—
(1)
In general— The Secretaries shall jointly commission an independent assessment of the program plan under subsection (d).
(2)
Submission— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretaries shall jointly submit to such committees the independent assessment conducted under paragraph (1).
(f)
Limitation of funds— Not more than 25 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for development , modernization, or enhancement of the integrated electronic health record within the Department of Veterans Affairs or for operation and maintenance for the Defense Health Agency of the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended until the date on which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees.
(g)
Monthly reporting— On a monthly basis, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans affairs shall each submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the expenditures incurred by the Secretary in the development of an integrated electronic health record under this section. Such reports shall include obligations by major categories of spending and by support of milestones identified in the program plan required under subsection (d).
(h)
Requirements—
(1)
In general— Not later than October 1, 2014, all health care information contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall be available and actionable in real-time to health care providers in each Department through shared technology.
(2)
Certification— At such time as the operational capability described in paragraph (1) is achieved, the Secretaries shall jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretaries have implemented such operational capability.
(3)
Limitation of funds— Neither the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may obligate or expend more than 10 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the research, development, test, and evaluation, or procurement for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record until the date on which the certification is made under paragraph (2).
(4)
Responsible official— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall each identify a senior official to be responsible for the electronic health record established under this section, including the operational capability described in paragraph (1). Such official shall have included within their performance evaluation performance metrics related to the execution of the responsibilities under this paragraph. Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the name of the senior official selected under this paragraph.
(5)
Accountability review— If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs fail to meet the requirements under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall jointly conduct an accountability review to identify the following:
(A)
The root cause of the failure and if the failure is a result of technology or human performance.
(B)
The work sections responsible for the failure.
(C)
The milestones and resource investment required to achieve such requirements.
(D)
The recommendations for corrective actions, to include personnel actions, to achieve such requirements.
(6)
Submission of accountability review— If the Secretaries conduct a review under paragraph (5), the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report of the results of the review by not later than November 30, 2014.
(i)
Advisory panel—
(1)
Establishment— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly establish an advisory panel to support the development and validation of requirements, programmatic assessment, and other actions, as needed by the Secretaries, with respect to the integrated electronic health record established under subsection (b). The panel shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that such record meets the definition of “integrated” as specified in subsection (j)(4).
(2)
Membership— The panel established under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than 14 members, appointed by the Secretaries as follows:
(A)
Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the Secretaries.
(B)
The chief information officer of the Department of Defense and the chief information officer of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(C)
One member from the acquisition community of the Department of Defense and one member from such community of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(D)
Two members from the academic community appointed by the Secretary of Defense.
(E)
Two members from the academic community appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(F)
Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of Defense.
(G)
Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(3)
Reporting— The Advisory panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a quarterly report on the activities of the panel. The panel shall submit the first report by not later than December 31, 2013.
(j)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term actionable means information that is directly useful to customers for immediate use in clinical decision making.
(2)
The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
(3)
The term generation 3 means, with respect to an electronic health systems, a system that has the technical capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the point of care and provide functionality for multiple care venues.
(4)
The term integrated means one single core technology or an inherent cross-platform capability without the need for additional patch development to accomplish this capability.

Sec. 735 Comptroller General report on recovery audit program for TRICARE

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that evaluates the similarities and differences in the approaches to identifying and recovering improper payments across Medicare and TRICARE. The report shall contain an evaluation of the following:
(1)
Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to prevent improper payments by denying claims prior to payment.
(2)
Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to correct improper payments post-payment.
(3)
The effectiveness of Medicare and TRICARE post-payment audit programs in place to identify and correct improper payments that are returned to the government plans.

VIII Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters

A Acquisition Policy and Management

Sec. 801 Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense business system acquisition programs when initial operating capability is not achieved within five years of Milestone A approval

(a)
Submission to pre-certification authority— Subsection (b) of section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2316; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking “the system shall be deemed to have undergone” and all that follows through the period and inserting “the appropriate official shall report such failure, along with the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure, to the appropriate pre-certification authority for that system under section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, and the information so reported shall be considered by the pre-certification authority in the decision whether to recommend certification of obligations under that section.”.
(b)
Covered systems— Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “3542(b)(2) of title 44” and inserting “section 2222(j)(2) of title 10”; and
(2)
by inserting “, and that is not designated in section 2445a of title 10, United States Code, as a “major automated information system program” or an “other major information technology investment program”” before the period at the end.
(c)
Updated references to DOD issuances— Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2” and inserting “Department of Defense Directive 5000.01”; and
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2, dated May 12, 2003” and inserting “Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, dated December 3, 2008”.

Sec. 802 Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories

(a)
Definitions— As used in this section:
(1)
The term “military department” has the meaning provided in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
The term “DOD laboratory” or “laboratory” means any facility or group of facilities that—
(A)
is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by the Department of Defense; and
(B)
meets the definition of “laboratory” as provided in subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
(b)
Authority—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each may authorize the heads of DOD laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for rights to other intellectual property, for computer software and its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory, but only if—
(A)
the computer software and related documentation would be a trade secret under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, if the information had been obtained from a non-Federal party;
(B)
the public is notified of the availability of the software and related documentation for licensing and interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit applications for licensing;
(C)
such licensing activities and licenses comply with the requirements under section 209 of title 35, United States Code; and
(D)
the software originally was developed to meet the military needs of the Department of Defense.
(2)
Protections against unauthorized disclosure— The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each shall provide appropriate precautions against the unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A), including exemption from section 552 of title 5, United States Code, for a period of up to 5 years after the development of the computer software by the DOD laboratory.
(c)
Royalties—
(1)
Use of royalties— Except as provided in paragraph (2), any royalties or other payments received by the Department of Defense or a military department from licensing computer software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be retained by the Department of Defense or the military department and shall be disposed of as follows:
(A)
(i)
The Department of Defense or the military department shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at least 15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, to be divided among the employees who developed the computer software.
(ii)
The Department of Defense or the military department may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the royalties or other payments, to laboratory employees who are not developers of such computer software but who substantially increased the technical value of the software.
(iii)
The Department of Defense or the military department shall retain the royalties and other payments received until it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory under clause (i) or (ii).
(iv)
The Department of Defense or the military department may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay expenses incidental to the administration and distribution of royalties or other payments under this section by an organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military department other than its laboratories.
(B)
The balance of the royalties or other payments shall be transferred by the Department of Defense or the military department to its laboratories, with the majority share of the royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where the development occurred. The royalties or other payments so transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by that laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are received or during the 2 succeeding fiscal years—
(i)
to reward scientific, engineering, and technical employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether the technology has commercial applications;
(ii)
to further scientific exchange among the laboratories of the agency;
(iii)
for education and training of employees consistent with the research and development missions and objectives of the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory, and for other activities that increase the potential for transfer of the technology of the laboratories;
(iv)
for payment of expenses incidental to the administration and licensing of computer software or other intellectual property made at that DOD laboratory, including the fees or other costs for the services of other agencies, persons, or organizations for intellectual property management and licensing services; or
(v)
for scientific research and development consistent with the research and development missions and objectives of the DOD laboratory.
(C)
All royalties or other payments retained by the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory after payments have been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) that are unobligated and unexpended at the end of the second fiscal year succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties and other payments were received shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States.
(2)
Exception— If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A), the balance of the royalties or other payments received by the Department of Defense or the military department in any fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by the DOD laboratory for research, development, engineering, testing, and evaluation or other related administrative, processing or value-added activities for that year, 75 percent of such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the United States and the remaining 25 percent may be used or obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used or obligated shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States.
(3)
Status of payments to employees— Any payment made to an employee under this section shall be in addition to the regular pay of the employee and to any other awards made to the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement of the employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to which the employee is otherwise entitled or for which the employee is otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof except that the monetary value of an award for the same project or effort shall be deducted from the amount otherwise available under this paragraph. Payments, determined under the terms of this paragraph and made to an employee developer as such, may continue after the developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the Department of Defense or military department. Payments made under this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any one person, unless the President approves a larger award (with the excess over $75,000 being treated as a Presidential award under section 4504 of title 5, United States Code).
(d)
Information in report— The report required by section 2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of this section.
(e)
Expiration— The authority provided in this section shall expire on December 31, 2018.

Sec. 803 Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489) is amended—
(1)
in subsections (a) and (b), by striking “fiscal year 2012 or 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015”;
(2)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
by striking “during fiscal years 2012 and 2013” in the matter preceding paragraph (1);
(B)
by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
(C)
in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking “fiscal years 2012 and 2013” and inserting “fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015”;
(3)
in subsection (d)(4), by striking “fiscal year 2012 or 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015”; and
(4)
by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(e) Carryover of reductions required—If the reductions required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 are not implemented, the amounts remaining for those reductions in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented in fiscal years 2014 and 2015.

“(f) Anti-Deficiency Act violation—Failure to comply with subsections (a) and (e) shall be considered violations of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code (popularly referred to as the Anti-Deficiency Act).”

B Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations

Sec. 811 Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts

Section 818(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1493; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
in clause (i), by inserting “electronic” after “avoid counterfeit”; and
(2)
in clause (ii), by striking “were provided” and inserting the following:

“(I) procured from an original manufacturer or its authorized dealer or from a trusted supplier in accordance with regulations described in paragraph (3); or

“(II) provided”

Sec. 812 Amendments relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts

Section 818(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “and” at the end;
(2)
in subparagraph (B), at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) the cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of obsolete parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts, unless—

“(i) the offeror’s proposal in response to a Department of Defense solicitation for maintenance, refurbishment, or remanufacture work identifies obsolete electronic parts and includes a plan to ensure trusted sources of supply for obsolete electronic parts, or to implement design modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts;

“(ii) the Department elects not to fund design modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts; and

“(iii) the contractor applies inspections and tests intended to detect counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts when purchasing electronic parts from other than the original manufacturers or their authorized dealers, pursuant to paragraph (3).”

Sec. 813 Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation

(a)
Defense contracts—
(1)
Amendments relating to contractor employees— Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except that the Secretary of Defense may establish narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and manufacturing fields upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of Defense has continued access to needed skills and capabilities.”

(2)
Amendments relating to senior executives of certain contractors— Section 2324(e)(1) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(Q) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a covered contractor.”

(3)
Definitions— Section 2324(l) of such title is amended—
(A)
by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5):

“(5) The term “senior executives”, with respect to a covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated employees of the contractor. In determining the five most highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the determination shall be made using the five most highly compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each component.”

(B)
by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7):

“(7) The term “covered contractor”, with respect to a fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during the previous fiscal year.”

(b)
Civilian agency contracts—
(1)
Amendments relating to contractor employees— Paragraph (16) of section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except that the executive agency may establish narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and manufacturing fields upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has continued access to needed skills and capabilities.”

(2)
Amendments relating to senior executives of certain contractors— Section 4304(a) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(17) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a covered contractor.”

(3)
Definitions— Section 4301 of such title is amended by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs (4) and (5):

“(4) The term “senior executives”, with respect to a covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated employees of the contractor. In determining the five most highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the determination shall be made using the five most highly compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each component.

“(5) The term “covered contractor”, with respect to a fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during the previous fiscal year.”

(c)
Conforming amendments— Chapter 11 of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking section 1127; and
(2)
by striking the item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter.
(d)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 814 Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports

(a)
Additional cost estimate information required to be included in Selected Acquisition Reports— Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C) and (D) as subparagraphs (C), (D), and (F), respectively;
(2)
by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph (B):

“(B) for each major defense acquisition program or designated major subprogram included in the report—

“(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;

“(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate;

“(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted or revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate; and

“(iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the current procurement cost for the program (as that term is used in section 2432(e)(4) of this title);”

(3)
in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking “and” at the end; and
(4)
by inserting after subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (E):

“(E) estimated contract termination costs; and”

(b)
Additional duties of Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation with respect to SAR—
(1)
Review required— Section 2334(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by striking “and” at the end of paragraph (6);
(B)
by striking the period and inserting “; and” at the end of paragraph (7); and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph (8):

“(8) annually review the cost estimates and associated information required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1)(B) of this title, in the Selected Acquisition Reports required by that section.”

(2)
Additional information required in annual report— Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended—
(A)
by striking “report, an assessment of—” and inserting “report—”;
(B)
in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by inserting “an assessment of” before the first word of the text;
(C)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “and” at the end;
(D)
in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(E)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(D) a summary of the cost estimate information reviewed under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends in that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk of the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, and recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis of the review under that subsection.”

Sec. 815 Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment

Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: “The Secretary of Defense shall also make the determination described in subsection (a)(2) available on a publicly accessible website.”.

Sec. 816 Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts

(a)
Requirement— Subparagraph (A) of section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “proposals; and” at the end of clause (ii) and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the following: “proposals and that must be assigned importance at least equal to all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined.”.
(b)
Waiver— Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) The requirement of subparagraph (A)(ii) relating to assigning at least equal importance to evaluation factors of cost or price may be waived by the head of the agency.”

(c)
Report— Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) Not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, and post on a publicly available website of the Department of Defense, a report containing a list of each waiver issued by the head of an agency under subparagraph (B) during the preceding fiscal year.”

Sec. 817 Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources

Section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) A flag of the United States of America (within the meaning of chapter 1 of title 4).”

C Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

Sec. 821 Amendments relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy

(a)
Amendments relating to prohibition— Section 841(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 126 Stat. 1510) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of a covered combatant command”;
(2)
in subparagraph (A)—
(A)
by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of the covered combatant command”; and
(B)
by striking “United States Central Command theater of operations” and inserting “theater of operations of that command”;
(3)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “United States Central Command theater of operations” and inserting “theater of operations of the covered combatant command”; and
(4)
in subparagraph (C)—
(A)
by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of the covered combatant command”; and
(B)
by striking “United States Central Command theater of operations” and inserting “theater of operations of that command”.
(b)
Amendments relating to contract clause— Section 841(b)(3) of such Act is amended—
(1)
by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$50,000”; and
(2)
by striking “United States Central Command theater of operations” and inserting “theater of operations of a covered combatant command”.
(c)
Amendments relating to identification of contracts— Section 841(c) of such Act is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
by striking “, acting through the Commander of the United States Central Command,”; and
(B)
by striking “United States Central Command theater of operations” and inserting “theaters of operations of covered combatant commands”;
(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of a covered combatant command”; and
(B)
by striking “Commander may notify” and inserting “commander may notify”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3), by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of a covered combatant command”.
(d)
Amendments relating to nondelegation of responsibilities— Section 841(d)(2) of such Act is amended by striking “Commander of the United States Central Command” and inserting “commander of a covered combatant command”.
(e)
Amendments relating to definitions— Section 841(f) of such Act is amended—
(1)
by striking the subsection heading and inserting “Definitions.—”;
(2)
by striking “In this section, the term” and inserting the following:

“(1) Contingency operation—The term”

(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) Covered combatant command—The term “covered combatant command” means the United States Central Command, the United States European Command, the United States Southern Command, and the United States Pacific Command.”

(f)
Repeal of sunset— Subsection (g) of section 841 of such Act is repealed.
(g)
Technical amendments—
(1)
Conforming amendment to section heading—
(A)
The heading of section 841 of such Act is amended by striking “in the United States Central Command Theater of Operations”.
(B)
The item relating to section 841 in the table of sections at the beginning of title VIII and in section 2 of such Act is amended to read as follows:
(2)
Repeal of superseded deadlines— Paragraph (1) of each of subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 841 of such Act is amended by striking “Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the” and inserting “The”.
(h)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall apply to contracts entered into on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 822 Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan

(a)
Penalties— Section 861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Penalties for failure to comply—Any contract in Afghanistan entered into or modified after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 may include a clause requiring the imposition of a penalty on any contractor that does not comply with the policies or guidance issued or the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c). Compliance with such policies, guidance, or regulations may be considered as a factor in the determination of award and incentive fees.”

(b)
Penalty information covered in report— Section 863(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Any penalties imposed on contractors for failing to comply with requirements under section 861(e), including requirements to provide information for the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4).”

D Other Matters

Sec. 831 Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items

Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4296; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.” and inserting “December 31, 2019.”.

Sec. 832 Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan

Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1845), is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.

Sec. 833 Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities

(a)
Report required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on how sole source suppliers of components to the Department of Defense procurement supply chain create vulnerabilities to military attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock, financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo of key raw materials or industrial inputs.
(b)
Matters covered— The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1)
A list of the components in the Department of Defense procurement supply chain for which there is a supplier that controls over 50 percent of the global market.
(2)
A list of parts of the supply chain where there is inadequate information to ascertain whether there is a single source supplier of components.
(3)
The Secretary’s recommendations on which single source suppliers create vulnerabilities, as well recommendations on how to reduce those vulnerabilities.
(c)
Form of report— The report required by subsection (a) may be classified.

Sec. 834 Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses

(a)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall issue a report that includes—
(1)
a description of the impacts of Department of Defense contracting with small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans and small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and veteran unemployment;
(2)
a description of the effect that increased economic opportunity for veterans has on issues such as veteran suicide and veteran homelessness; and
(3)
an analysis of the feasibility and expected impacts of the implementation within the Department of Defense of a contracting program modeled on the program authorized under section 8127 of title 38, United States Code.
(b)
Definitions— In this section—
(1)
the term “veteran” has the meaning given the term under section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code; and
(2)
the terms “small business concern owned and controlled by veterans” and “small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans” have the meanings given such terms under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).

Sec. 835 Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of sole-source defense contracts

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify the provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2401) to clarify that the authority of the head of an agency (as defined in section 811(c)(2)(A) of such section) to make an award pursuant to such section is delegable.

Sec. 836 Improved management of Defense equipment and supplies through automated information and data capture technologies

The Secretary of Defense shall improve the management of defense equipment and supplies throughout their life cycles by adopting and implementing Item Unique Identification (IUID), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), biometrics, and other automated information and data capture (AIDC) technologies for the tracking, management, and accountability for assets deployed across the Department of Defense.

Sec. 837 Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to take into account sourcing laws

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to implement the requirements imposed by sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and 2463 of title 10, United States Code.

Sec. 838 Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in United States

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to purchase military coins that are not produced in the United States.

Sec. 839 Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces

(a)
Requirement— Section 418 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d)

“(1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such footwear directly to the members instead of providing a cash allowance to the members for the purchase of such footwear.

“(2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the requirements of section 2533a of title 10, without regard to the applicability of any simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any other provision of law).

“(3) This subsection does not prohibit the provision of a cash allowance to a member described in paragraph (1) for the purchase of athletic footwear if such footwear—

“(A) is medically required to meet unique physiological needs of the member; and

“(B) cannot be met with athletic footwear that complies with the requirements of this subsection.”

(b)
Certification— The amendment made by subsection (a) shall not take effect until the Secretary of Defense certifies that there are at least two sources that can provide athletic footwear to the Department of Defense that is 100 percent compliant with section 2533a of title 10, United States Code.

IX Department of Defense Organization and Management

A Department of Defense Management

Sec. 901 Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps

(a)
Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps—
(1)
Redesignation of Military Department— The military department designated as the Department of the Navy is redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(2)
Redesignation of Secretary and Other Statutory Offices—
(A)
Secretary— The position of the Secretary of the Navy is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(B)
Other statutory offices— The positions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
(b)
Conforming amendments to title 10, United States Code—
(1)
Definition of “Military Department”— Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(8) The term “military department” means the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air Force.”

(2)
Organization of Department— The text of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as follows: “The Department of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.”.
(3)
Position of Secretary— Section 5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking “There is a Secretary of the Navy” and inserting “There is a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(4)
Chapter Headings—
(A)
The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“503 Department of the Navy and Marine Corps”

(B)
The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to read as follows:

“507 Composition of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps”

(5)
Other Amendments—
(A)
Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively, in each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter stricken.
(B)
(i)
Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy” and inserting “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(ii)
The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by inserting “and Marine Corps” after “of the Navy”, with the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter amended.
(c)
Other provisions of law and other references—
(1)
Title 37, United States Code— Title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively.
(2)
Other References— Any reference in any law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to that office as redesignated by that section.
(d)
Effective date— This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 902 Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise architecture

Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “defense business enterprise architecture” and inserting “target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)”;
(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by striking “existing as of September 30, 2011 (known as “legacy systems”) that will not be part of the defense business enterprise architecture” and inserting “that will be phased out of the defense business systems computing environment within three years after review and certification as “legacy systems” by the investment management process established under subsection (g)”; and
(B)
by striking “that provides for reducing the use of those legacy systems in phases”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3), by striking “legacy systems (referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)” and inserting “existing systems that are part of the target defense business systems computing environment”.

Sec. 903 Report on strategic importance of United States military installation of the U.S. Pacific Command

(a)
Report required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the strategic value of each major installation that supports operations in the United States Pacific Command.
(b)
Content of report— The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of the following with respect to each major installation covered by the report:
(1)
The strategic value of the operations of the installation in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility, including the strategic value of the installation for the global deployment of airpower, military personnel, and logistical support.
(2)
The usefulness of the installation for potential future missions, including military, search and rescue, and humanitarian missions in a changing Pacific and Arctic region.
(3)
The suitability of the installation for basing of F–35 aircraft and other future weapons systems in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.
(4)
The suitability of the installation for mission growth, including relocation of combat-coded aircraft, Army units, naval vessels, and Marine Corps units from overseas bases.
(5)
How critical the installation is in maintaining and expanding the North and Southern Pacific air refueling bridge.
(6)
The availability of the installation for basing remotely piloted aircraft.
(7)
The proximity of the installation to scoreable, instrumented training ranges, with an emphasis on joint-training.
(8)
The impact of urban encroachment on the installation and its training ranges.
(c)
Classified annex— The report required by subsection (a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe the matters required by subsection (b).

Sec. 904 Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented United States military installations

(a)
Report required— Not later than March 1, 2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the results of a review of the potential for—
(1)
effectively consolidating underused facilities on military installations; or
(2)
vacating costly leased space by relocating Federal Government agency tenants, activities, missions, and personnel onto such installations.
(b)
Specific consideration of Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented installations— As a result of the Federal Government’s decision to emphasize Asia-Pacific security issues and changes in the Arctic environment, the Comptroller General shall specifically evaluate potential consolidation of Federal tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented installations, focusing on Federal entities with homeland security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other national security-related functions that are compatible with the missions of the military installations.

B Space Activities

Sec. 911 National security space satellite reporting policy

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Department of Defense depends on national security space programs to support, among other critical capabilities—
(A)
communications;
(B)
missile warning;
(C)
position, navigation, and timing;
(D)
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and
(E)
environmental monitoring; and
(2)
foreign threats to national security space systems are increasing.
(b)
Notification of foreign interference of national security space— Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space

“(a) Notice required—The Secretary of Defense shall, with respect to each attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability, provide to the appropriate congressional committees—

“(1) not later than 48 hours after the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, notice of such attempt; and

“(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) with respect to such attempt.

“(b) Notification description—A notification described in this subsection is a notification that includes—

“(1) the name and a brief description of the national security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability;

“(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and

“(3) any other information the Secretary considers relevant.

“(c) Appropriate congressional committees defined—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

“(1) the congressional defense committees; and

“(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to an attempt by a foreign entity to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.”

(c)
Table of sections amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following item:

Sec. 912 National security space defense and protection

(a)
Review— The Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council to—
(1)
in response to the near-term and long-term threats to the national security space systems of the United States, conduct a review of—
(A)
the range of strategic options available to address such threats, in terms of deterring hostile actions, defeating hostile actions, or surviving hostile actions until such actions conclude;
(B)
strategies and plans to counter such threats, including resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and other appropriate concepts; and
(C)
existing and planned architectures, warfighter requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, or other factors related to addressing such threats; and
(2)
identify recommend courses of action to address such threats, including potential barriers or limiting factors in implementing such courses of action.
(b)
Report—
(1)
In general— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Research Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a) and the recommended courses of action identified pursuant to such arrangement.
(2)
Form— The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Space protection strategy— Section 911(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking “including each of the matters required by subsection (c).” and inserting the following:

“(A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); and

“(B) a description of how the Department of Defense and the intelligence community plan to provide necessary national security capabilities, through alternative space, airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, denies access to, or destroys United States national security space capabilities.”

Sec. 913 Space acquisition strategy

(a)
Strategy required— The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year procurement of commercial satellite services.
(b)
Basis— The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include and be based on—
(1)
an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches;
(2)
an analysis of the risks associated with such acquisition approaches;
(3)
an identification of methods to address planning, programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such approaches, including methods to address potential termination liability or cancellation costs generally associated with multi-year contracts;
(4)
an identification of any changes needed in the requirements development and approval processes of the Department of Defense to facilitate effective and efficient implementation of such strategy, including an identification of any consolidation of requirements for such services across the Department that may achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and
(5)
an identification of any necessary changes to policies, procedures, regulations, or statutes.
(c)
Submission— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy required under subsection (a), including the elements required under subsection (b).

Sec. 914 Space control mission report

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the space control mission of the Department of Defense. Such report shall include—
(1)
an identification of existing offensive and defensive space control systems, policies, and technical possibilities of future systems;
(2)
an identification of any gaps or risks in existing space control system architecture and possibilities for improvement or mitigation of such gaps or risks;
(3)
a description of existing and future sensor coverage and ground processing capabilities for space situational awareness;
(4)
an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and available information is being utilized for space situational awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space;
(5)
a description of existing space situational awareness data sharing practices, including what information is being shared and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are to the national security of the United States; and
(6)
plans for the future space control mission.

Sec. 915 Responsive launch

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
United States Strategic Command has identified three needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and dependence on space capabilities as follows:
(A)
To rapidly augment existing space capabilities when needed to expand operational capability.
(B)
To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability.
(C)
To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological or operational innovations to increase the advantage of the United States.
(2)
Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist in addressing such needs of the combatant commands.
(b)
Study— The Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch efforts. Such study shall include—
(1)
a review of existing and past operationally responsive, low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or industry;
(2)
a technology assessment of various methods to develop an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and
(3)
an assessment of the viability of greater utilization of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload adapters on existing launch vehicles.
(c)
Report— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(1)
the results of the study conducted under subsection (b); and
(2)
a consolidated plan for development within the Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability.

C Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

Sec. 921 Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities

(a)
Period for required audits— Section 432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in the first sentence, by striking “annually” and inserting “biennially”; and
(2)
in the second sentence, by striking “the intelligence committees” and all that follows and inserting “the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 437(c)).”.
(b)
Repeal of designation of defense intelligence agency as required oversight authority within department of defense— Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “Defense Intelligence Agency” and inserting “Department of Defense”; and
(2)
by striking “management and supervision” and inserting “oversight”.
(c)
Congressional oversight— Section 437 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “the intelligence committees” and inserting “congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees”;
(2)
in subsection (b), by striking “the intelligence committees” and inserting “congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) Congressional intelligence committees defined—In this section, the term “congressional intelligence committees” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).”

Sec. 922 Department of Defense intelligence priorities

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
establish a written policy governing the internal coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments to improve identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of Defense;
(2)
identify any significant intelligence gaps of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments; and
(3)
provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on the policy established under paragraph (1) and the gaps identified under paragraph (2).

Sec. 923 Defense Clandestine Service

(a)
Certification required— Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense for the Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be obligated or expended for the Defense Clandestine Service until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the covered congressional committees that—
(1)
the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily to—
(A)
fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that are unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise unmet; and
(B)
provide unique capabilities to the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and
(2)
the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that will be used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service is employed as described in paragraph (1).
(b)
Annual assessments— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based on the metrics referred to in subsection (a)(2).
(c)
Notification of future changes to design— Following the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection (a), in the event that any significant change is made to the Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly notify the covered congressional committees of the nature of such change.
(d)
Quarterly briefings— The Secretary of Defense shall quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a briefing on the deployments and collection activities of personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service.
(e)
Covered congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “covered congressional committees” means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Sec. 924 Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation

(a)
Prohibition— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute—
(1)
the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2)
the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
(3)
the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget.
(b)
Briefing requirement— Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing regarding any planning relating to the future execution of the activities described in subsection (a) that has occurred during the two-year period ending on such date and any anticipated future planning relating to such execution or related efforts.
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
National Intelligence Program— The term “National Intelligence Program” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(2)
National Intelligence Program budget— The term “National Intelligence Program budget” means the portions of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program.

D Cyberspace-Related Matters

Sec. 931 Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical data link systems

Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2225 note; Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1885) is amended by inserting “and an assessment of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access or area-denial environments” before the semicolon.

Sec. 932 Defense Science Board assessment of United States Cyber Command

(a)
Assessment— The Defense Science Board shall conduct an assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of the United States Cyber Command.
(b)
Elements— The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
A review of the existing organizational structure of the United States Cyber Command, including—
(A)
the positive and negative impact on the Command resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency;
(B)
the oversight activities undertaken by the Commander and the Director with regard to the Command and the Agency, respectively, including how the respective oversight activities affect the ability of each entity to complete the respective missions of such entity;
(C)
the dependencies of the Command and the Agency on one another under the existing management structure of both entities, including an examination of the advantages and disadvantages attributable to the unity of command and unity of effort resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency;
(D)
the ability of the existing management structure of the Command and the Agency to identify and adequately address potential conflicts of interest between the roles of the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency; and
(E)
the ability of the Department of Defense to train and develop, through professional assignment, individuals with the appropriate subject-matter expertise and management experience to support both the cyber operations missions of the Command and the signals intelligence missions of the Agency.
(2)
A review of the missions of the Command, including whether the reliance of the Command on the Agency for critical warfighting infrastructure, organization, and personnel contributes to or detracts from the ability of the Command to achieve the missions of the Command.
(3)
A review of how the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency implement authorities where missions intersect to ensure that the activities of each entity are conducted only pursuant to the respective authorities of each entity.
(c)
Report—
(1)
Report required— Not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report containing—
(A)
the results of the assessment required by subsection (a); and
(B)
recommendations for improvements or changes to the organization, missions, or authorities of the United States Cyber Command.
(2)
Additional evaluation required— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the committees referred to in paragraph (1) receive the report required by such paragraph, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to such committees an evaluation of the findings and recommendations contained in such report.
(3)
Form— The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d)
Intelligence community defined— In this section, the term “intelligence community” has the meaning given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).

Sec. 933 Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense

(a)
Mission analysis required— Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber operations of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Elements— The mission analysis under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
The concept of operations and concept of employment for cyber operations forces.
(2)
An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber operations forces, including military requirements for both active and reserve components and civilian requirements.
(3)
An assessment of the mechanisms for improving recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations forces, including through focused recruiting; educational, training, or certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use of short-term or virtual deployments without the need for permanent relocation.
(4)
A description of the alignment of the organization and reporting chains of the Department, the military departments, and the combatant commands.
(5)
An assessment of the current, as of the date of the analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations forces.
(6)
An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber operations, depends upon organizations outside of the Department, including industry and international partners.
(7)
Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and continuity of operations for cyber operations.
(8)
An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve components in the concept of operations and concept of employment for cyber operations forces required under paragraph (1).
(c)
Report required— Not later than 30 days after the completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(1)
the results of the mission analysis; and
(2)
recommendations for improving or changing the roles, organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities related to the cyber operations of the Department.
(d)
National Guard assessment— Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under subsection (c), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the role of the National Guard in supporting the cyber operations mission of the Department of Defense as such mission is described in such report.
(e)
Form— The report under subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

Sec. 934 Notification of investigations related to compromise of critical program information

(a)
Notification of investigation initiation—
(1)
Notification— Not later than 30 days after the date of the initiation of any investigation related to the potential compromise of Department of Defense critical program information related to a weapons system or other developmental activity, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such investigation including the elements required under paragraph (2).
(2)
Elements— The written notification required under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to an investigation described in such subsection, the following elements:
(A)
A statement of the reason for such investigation.
(B)
An identification of each party affected by such investigation.
(C)
An identification of the party responsible for conducting such investigation.
(D)
Any preliminary observations, findings, or recommendations related to such investigation.
(E)
A timeline and methodology for conducting such investigation.
(b)
Notification of completion of certain investigations— Not later than 30 days after the date of the completion of any investigation conducted or overseen by the Damage Assessment Management Office of the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such investigation, including a summary of the findings and recommendations of such investigation, an estimate of the economic losses from the intrusion, and any additional actions needed to improve the protection of intellectual property.
(c)
Report on intrusions after January 1, 2000— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the known network cyber intrusions that occurred on or after January 1, 2000, and before August 1, 2013, and resulted in the compromise of critical program information related to a weapons system, information system development, or another research and development initiative of the Department of Defense. Such report shall include a description of the critical program information that was compromised, the source of each network that was compromised, the systems or developmental activities that were compromised, an estimate of the economic losses from the intrusion, and the suspected origin of each cyber intrusion.

Sec. 935 Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense

(a)
Updated plan—
(1)
Update— The Chief Information Officer of the Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the chief information officers of the military departments and the Defense Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of selected software licenses of the Department of Defense required under section 937 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to include a plan for the inventory of all software licenses of the Department of Defense for which a military department spends more than $5,000,000 annually on any individual title, including a comparison of licenses purchased with licenses installed and of those uninstalled and then reinstalled.
(2)
Elements— The update required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
be done in a comprehensive and auditable format that is verified by an independent third party;
(B)
include details on the process and business systems necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for validating and reporting deregistering and registering new software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information to the enterprise provider; and
(C)
a proposed timeline for implementation of the updated plan in accordance with paragraph (3).
(3)
Implementation— Not later than September 30, 2013, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall implement the updated plan required under paragraph (1).
(b)
Performance plan— If the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense determines through the update required by subsection (a) that the number of software licenses of the Department for an individual title for which a military department spends greater than $5,000,000 annually exceeds the needs of the Department for such software licenses, or the inventory discloses that there is a discrepancy between the number of software licenses purchased and those in actual use, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a plan to bring the number of such software licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and the terms of any relevant contract.

Sec. 936 Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity activities with China

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used for collaborative cybersecurity activities with the People’s Republic of China or any entity owned or controlled by China, including cybersecurity war games, cybersecurity working groups, the exchange of classified cybersecurity technologies or methods, and the exchange of procedures for investigating cyber intrusions.

Sec. 937 Small business cybersecurity solutions office

(a)
Establishment— The Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the Congress on the feasibility of establishing a small business cyber technology office to assist small business concerns in providing cybersecurity solutions to the Federal Government.
(b)
Definitions— In this section, the terms “small business concern” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Small Business Act.

Sec. 938 Small business cyber education

The Secretary of Defense shall establish an outreach and education program to assist small businesses (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) contracted by the Department of Defense to assist such businesses to—
(1)
understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats;
(2)
develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and
(3)
develop a plan to protect the networks of such businesses.

E Total Force Management

Sec. 941 Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of Government oversight of functions closely associated with inherently Governmental functions

(a)
Requirement— Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) Requirement for oversight or appropriate corrective actions—For purposes of subsection (f)(3)(B), if insufficient levels of Government oversight are found, the Secretary of the military department or head of the Defense Agency responsible shall provide such oversight or take appropriate corrective actions, including potential conversion to Government performance, consistent with this section and sections 129 and 2463 of this title.”

(b)
Amendment relating to review of certain contracts— Subsection (e)(2)(C) of section 2330a of such title is amended by adding after “governmental functions” the following: “in which there is inadequate oversight of the contractor personnel performing such functions”.

Sec. 942 Five-year requirement for certification of appropriate manpower performance

Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (f) the following new section (g):

“(g) Certifications of appropriate manpower performance

“(1) Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and continuing through fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense, or an official designated personally by the Secretary, no later than February 1 of each reporting year, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the findings of the reviews required under subsection (e) and certify in writing that—

“(A) all Department of Defense contractor positions identified as being responsible for the performance of inherently governmental functions have been eliminated;

“(B) each Department of Defense contract that is a personal services contract has been entered into, and is being performed, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations; and

“(C) any contract for services that includes any functions that are closely associated with inherently governmental functions or designated as critical have been reviewed to determine if those activities should be—

“(i) subject to action pursuant to section 2463 of this title; or

“(ii) converted to an acquisition approach that would be more advantageous to the Department of Defense.

“(2) If the certifications required in paragraph (1) are not submitted by the date required in a reporting year, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall assess the Department’s compliance with subsection (e) and determine why the Secretary could not make the certifications required in paragraph (1). The Inspector General shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than May 1 of the reporting year, a report on such assessment and determination.

“(3) Not later than May 1 of each reporting year, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the Comptroller General’s assessment of the reviews conducted under subsection (e) and the actions taken to resolve the findings of the reviews.”

X General Provisions

A Financial Matters

Sec. 1001 General transfer authority

(a)
Authority to transfer authorizations—
(1)
Authority— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
Limitation— Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $3,500,000,000.
(3)
Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations— A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(b)
Limitations— The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(1)
may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and
(2)
may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress.
(c)
Effect on authorization amounts— A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(d)
Notice to congress— The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

Sec. 1002 Budgetary effects of this Act

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act.

Sec. 1003 Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements

(a)
Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
reaffirms the findings of the Panel on Defense Financial Management and Auditability Reform of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
(2)
points to the Government Accountability Office’s most recent High Risk List recommendations;
(3)
is encouraged by the important progress the Department of Defense has made in achieving auditability; and
(4)
stands ready to continue helping in this effort.
(b)
Sense of Congress on DOD financial management reform— It is the sense of Congress that, in the aftermath of the effects of sequestration as enacted by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), financial management reform is imperative, and the Department of Defense should place continued importance on, and remain vigilant in, its financial management reform efforts.
(c)
Audit of DOD financial statements— In addition to the requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be taken and the costs associated with ensuring that the financial statements of the Department of Defense are validated as ready for audit by not later than September 30, 2017, upon the conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a full audit is performed on the financial statements of the Department of Defense for such fiscal year. The Secretary shall submit to Congress the results of that audit by not later than March 31, 2019.

Sec. 1004 Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization

(a)
Transfer authorized— If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 is less than $8,400,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2014 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b)
Notice to Congress— In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred.
(c)
Transfer mechanism— Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of law.
(d)
Construction of authority— The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act.

B Counter-Drug Activities

Sec. 1011 Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia

Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “2013” and inserting “2014”; and
(2)
in subsection (c), by striking “2013” and inserting “2014”.

Sec. 1012 Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities

Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 U.S.C. 371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2014”.

Sec. 1013 Two-year extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments

Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1557), is amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2015”.

Sec. 1014 Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program is a valuable tool to counter-drug operations across the United States, especially on the southwest border;
(2)
the National Guard has an important role in combating drug trafficking into the United States; and
(3)
the program should received continued funding.

C Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Sec. 1021 Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost to the navy

(a)
Clarification of transfer authority— Subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(a) Authority to make transfer—The Secretary of the Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public display in the United States, to—

“(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth or possession of the United States, or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof; or

“(2) any nonprofit entity.”

(b)
Clarification of limitations on liability and responsibility— Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(b) Limitations on liability and responsibility

“(1) The United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity for any injury or damage to any person or property occurring on a vessel donated under this section.

“(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall have no responsibility or obligation to make, engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under this section.”

(c)
Clarification that transfers to be made at no cost to united states— Subsection (c) of such section is amended by inserting after “under this section” the following: “, the maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, including demilitarization of Munitions List items at the end of the useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,”.
(d)
Application of environmental laws; definitions— Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(e) Application of environmental laws—Nothing in this section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee.

“(f) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) The term “nonprofit entity” means any entity qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

“(2) The term “Munitions List” means the United States Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).

“(3) The term “donee” means any entity receiving a vessel pursuant to subsection (a).”

(e)
Clerical amendments—
(1)
Section heading— The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by donation”

(2)
Table of sections— The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 1022 Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships

(a)
Limitation on availability of funds—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.
(2)
Exception— Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the funds referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended to retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9.
(b)
Authority to transfer authorizations—
(1)
Authority— Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Defense may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 specifically for the modernization of vessels referred to in subsection (a)(1). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
Limitation— The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $914,676,000.
(3)
Additional authority— The transfer authority provided by this subsection is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001 of this Act and under section 1001 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1902).

Sec. 1023 Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards

(a)
Nonhomeported vessels— Subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “A naval” and inserting “(1) A naval”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) For purposes of this section, a naval vessel that does not have a designated homeport shall be treated as being homeported in the United States or Guam.”

(b)
Voyage repair— Such section is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (c)(3)(C), by striking “as defined in Commander Military Sealift Command Instruction 4700.15C (September 13, 2007) or Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (Commander Fleet Forces Command Instruction 4790.3 Revision A, Change 7), Volume III”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) Voyage repair defined—In this section, the term “voyage repair” has the meaning given such term in Navy Instruction COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3B.”

Sec. 1024 Sense of Congress regarding a balanced future naval force

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The battle force of the Navy must be sufficiently sized and balanced in capability to meet current and anticipated future national security objectives.
(2)
A robust and balanced naval force is required for the Department of Defense to fully execute the President’s National Security Strategy.
(3)
To develop and sustain required capabilities the Navy must balance investment and maintenance costs across various ship types, including—
(A)
aircraft carriers;
(B)
surface combatants;
(C)
submarines;
(D)
amphibious assault ships; and
(E)
other auxiliary vessels, including support vessels operated by the Military Sealift Command.
(4)
Despite a Marine Corps requirement for 38 amphibious assault ships, the Navy possesses only 30 amphibious assault ships with an average of 22 ships available for surge deployment.
(5)
The inadequate level of investment in Navy shipbuilding over the last 20 years has resulted in—
(A)
a fragile shipbuilding industrial base, both in the construction yards and secondary suppliers of materiel and equipment; and
(B)
increased costs per vessel stemming from low production volume.
(6)
The Department of Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2013 provided $263,000,000 towards the advance procurement of materiel and equipment required to continue the San Antonio LPD 17 amphibious transport dock class to a total of 12 ships, a key first step in rebalancing the amphibious assault ship force structure.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the Sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Department of Defense and the Department of the Navy must prioritize funding towards increased shipbuilding rates to enable the Navy to meet the full-range of combatant commander requests;
(2)
the Department of the Navy’s future budget requests and the Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces must realistically anticipate and reflect the true investment necessary to meet stated force structure goals;
(3)
without modification to Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces shipbuilding plan, the future of the industrial base that enables construction of large, combat-survivable amphibious assault ships is at significant risk; and
(4)
the Department of Defense and Congress should act expeditiously to restore the force structure and capability balance of the Navy fleet as quickly as possible.

Sec. 1025 Authority for short-term extension or renewal of leases for vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program

(a)
In general— Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend or renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after the date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an extension shall be for a term that is the shorter of—
(1)
the period beginning on the date of the expiration of the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which the Secretary determines that a substitute is available for the capabilities provided by the lease, or that the capabilities provided by the vessel are no longer required; or
(2)
180 days.
(b)
Funding— Amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance, Navy, as specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may be available for the extension or renewal of a lease under subsection (a).
(c)
Notice to Congress— Prior to extending or renewing a lease under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees notification of the proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall include—
(1)
a detailed description of the term of the proposed contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and a justification for extending or renewing the lease rather than obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, charter, or services involved through purchase of the vessel; and
(2)
a plan for meeting the capability provided for by the lease upon the completion of the term of the lease contract, as extended or renewed under subsection (a).

Sec. 1026 Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships

Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of acquiring DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. The report shall include each of the following:
(1)
An updated estimate of the total cost to develop, procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense capable DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile defense radar that would be procured in addition to the three prior-year-funded DDG 1000 class ships, and in lieu of Flight III DDG–51 destroyers.
(2)
The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight III DDG 51 destroyers.
(3)
Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
(4)
An updated comparison of the program risks and the resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just ballistic missile defense) of the options referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2).
(5)
Any other information the Secretary determines appropriate.

Sec. 1027 Sense of Congress on establishment of an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health

It is the sense of Congress that the President should establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled “Energy Employees Compensation: Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program’s Credibility”, numbered GAO–10–302, to—
(1)
advise the President concerning the review and approval of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix;
(2)
conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the weighing of a claimant’s medical evidence;
(3)
obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements for part B claims related to lung disease regardless of approval;
(4)
provide oversight over industrial hygienists, Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of Labor’s consulting physicians and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and
(5)
coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to the extent necessary (under section 3624 the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384o).

D Counterterrorism

Sec. 1030 Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions

(a)
Primary and alternate members—
(1)
Number of members— Subsection (a) of section 948m of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
by striking “at least five members” and inserting “at least five primary members and as many alternate members as the convening authority shall detail”; and
(ii)
by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Alternate members shall be designated in the order in which they will replace an excused primary member.”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “primary” after “the number of”.
(2)
General rules— Such section is further amended—
(A)
by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and
(B)
by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections (b) and (c):

“(b) Primary members—Primary members of a military commission under this chapter are voting members.

“(c) Alternate members

“(1) A military commission may include alternate members to replace primary members who are excused from service on the commission.

“(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall replace the excused primary member and the trial may proceed.”

(3)
Excuse of members— Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended—
(A)
in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting “primary or alternate” before “member”;
(B)
by striking “or” at the end of paragraph (2);
(C)
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting “; or”; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to reduce the number of alternate members required for service on the commission, as determined by the convening authority.”

(4)
Absent and additional members— Subsection (e) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended—
(A)
in the first sentence—
(i)
by inserting “the number of primary members of” after “Whenever”;
(ii)
by inserting “primary” before “members required by”; and
(iii)
by inserting “and there are no remaining alternate members to replace the excused primary members” after “subsection (a)”; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new sentence: “An alternate member who was present for the introduction of all evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional member.”.
(b)
Challenges— Section 949f of such title is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by inserting “primary or alternate” before “member”; and
(2)
by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new sentence: “Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.”.
(c)
Number of votes required— Section 949m of such title is amended—
(1)
by inserting “primary” before “members” each place it appears; and
(2)
by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new paragraph:

“(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence need not be the same primary members who voted on the conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this title are met.”

Sec. 1031 Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement

(a)
In general— Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by inserting “, including engagement activities for program alumni,” after “effectiveness of the program”;
(2)
in paragraph (4), by inserting after “program” the following: “, including a list of any unfunded or unmet training requirements and requests”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(5) A discussion and justification of how the program fits within the theater security priorities of each of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands.”

(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1032 Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

(a)
In general— No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by Congress.
(b)
Exception— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c)
Individual detained at Guantanamo defined— In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1033(f)(2).

Sec. 1033 Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities

(a)
Certification required prior to transfer—
(1)
In general— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual.
(2)
Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(b)
Certification— A certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, that—
(1)
the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred—
(A)
is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization;
(B)
maintains control over each detention facility in which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility;
(C)
is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual;
(D)
has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;
(E)
has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist activity; and
(F)
has agreed to share with the United States any information that—
(i)
is related to the individual or any associates of the individual; and
(ii)
could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies; and
(2)
includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to the Secretary’s certifications.
(c)
Prohibition in cases of prior confirmed recidivism—
(1)
Prohibition— Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity.
(2)
Exception— Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance).
(d)
National security waiver—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c) and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, determines that—
(A)
alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be waived;
(B)
in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with regard to the individual to be transferred;
(C)
in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and
(D)
the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States.
(2)
Reports— Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual concerned, the following:
(A)
A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned.
(B)
A statement of the basis for the determination, including—
(i)
an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States;
(ii)
in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated; and
(iii)
a classified summary of—
(I)
the individual’s record of cooperation while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(II)
the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for continuing cooperation.
(C)
A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.
(D)
The assessment required by subsection (b)(2).
(e)
Record of cooperation— In assessing the risk that an individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist activity or other actions that could affect the security of the United States if released for the purpose of making a certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable consideration to any such individual—
(1)
who has substantially cooperated with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and
(2)
for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities.
(f)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)
The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—
(A)
is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(B)
is—
(i)
in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or
(ii)
otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(3)
The term “foreign terrorist organization” means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).

Sec. 1034 Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—
(1)
is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(2)
is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

Sec. 1035 Unclassified summary of information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly available an unclassified summary of information relating to the individuals detained by the Department of Defense at the Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to represent an enduring security threat to the United States. Such summary shall cover any individual detained at such facility as of the date of the enactment of this Act and any individual so detained during the two-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act. Such summary shall include for each such covered individual—
(1)
a description of the relevant organization or organizations with which the individual is affiliated;
(2)
whether the individual had ever been in the custody or under the effective control of the United States at any time before being detained at such facility and, if so, where the individual had been in such custody or under such effective control; and
(3)
whether the individual has been directly linked to the death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or any United States Government employee.

Sec. 1036 Assessment of affiliates and adherents of al-Qaeda outside the United States

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives an assessment containing each of the following:
(1)
An identification of any group operating outside the United States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or otherwise related to, al-Qaeda.
(2)
A summary of relevant information relating to each such group, including—
(A)
the extent to which members or leaders of the group have—
(i)
conducted or planned to conduct lethal or significant operations outside the borders of the state or states in which the group ordinarily operates;
(ii)
conducted fundraising or recruiting outside the borders of such state or states; and
(iii)
have demonstrated any interest in conducting activities described in clauses (i) and (ii) outside the borders of such state or states;
(B)
the extent to which the connection of the group to the senior leadership of al-Qaeda has changed over time; and
(C)
whether the group has attacked or planned to purposefully attack United States citizens, members of Armed Forces of the United States, or other representatives of the United States, or is likely to do so in the future.
(3)
An assessment of whether each group is part of or substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban, or constitutes an associated force that is engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners for purposes of interpreting the scope of section 2 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 115 Stat. 224; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
(4)
The criteria used to determine the nature and extent of each group’s relationship to al-Qaeda.

Sec. 1037 Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
designate a senior official of the Department of Defense as the official with principal responsibility for coordination and management of the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and
(2)
set forth the responsibilities of that senior official with respect to such transfers.

Sec. 1038 Rank of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo

For purposes of any military commission established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in section 948a of such title) who is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same rank.

Sec. 1039 Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the capability of the government of Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1033(f)(2)) who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be encountered in transferring individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen.

Sec. 1040 Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that includes each of the following:
(1)
A description of the extent to which an individual detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States, could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for—
(A)
relief from removal from the United States, including pursuant to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
(B)
any required release from immigration detention, including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis;
(C)
asylum or withholding of removal; or
(D)
any additional constitutional right.
(2)
For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which the Secretary and Attorney General determine such an individual could become eligible if so transferred, a description of the reasoning behind such determination and an explanation of the nature of the right.

Sec. 1040A Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups

(a)
In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly available a summary of information relating to individuals who were formerly detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being transferred or released from such detention, have become leaders or involved in the leadership structure of a foreign terrorist group.
(b)
Form of summary— The summary required under subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. The Secretary of Defense shall submit any such classified annex to the congressional defense committees.

Sec. 1040B Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force

(a)
Availability of writ of habeas corpus— Nothing in the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any other law, shall be construed to deny the availability of the writ of habeas corpus to any United States citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
(b)
Procedures— In any habeas proceeding brought by a United States citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), the government shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that such citizen is an unprivileged enemy belligerent and there shall be no presumption that any evidence presented by the government as justification for the apprehension and subsequent detention is accurate and authentic.

Sec. 1040C Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be used to provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Sec. 1040D Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen

None of the amounts authorized to be available to the Department of Defense may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release, during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1033(f)(2)) to the custody or control of the Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen.

E Sensitive Military Operations

Sec. 1041 Congressional notification of sensitive military operations

(a)
Notification required—
(1)
In general— Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations

“(a) In general—The Secretary of Defense shall promptly submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing of any sensitive military operation following such operation.

“(b) Procedures

“(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and submit to the congressional defense committees procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection (a) consistent with the national security of the United States and the protection of operational integrity.

“(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure that committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to national security of the United States are sufficient to protect the information that is submitted to the committees pursuant to this section.

“(c) Sensitive military operation defined—The term “sensitive military operation” means a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the United States pursuant to—

“(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or

“(2) any other authority except—

“(A) a declaration of war; or

“(B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of force other than the authorization referred to in paragraph (1).

“(d) Exception—The notification requirement under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive military operation executed within the territory of Afghanistan pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).

“(e) Rule of construction—Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide any new authority or to alter or otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.), the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 130e the following new item:
(b)
Effective date— Section 130f of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to any sensitive military operation (as defined in subsection (c) of such section) executed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c)
Deadline for submittal of procedures— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1042 Report on process for determining targets of lethal operations

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval processes used in determining whether an individual or group of individuals could be the target of a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United States outside the United States.

Sec. 1043 Counterterrorism operational briefings

(a)
Briefings required— Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations

“(a) Briefings Required—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities.

“(b) Elements—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:

“(1) A global update on activity within each geographic combatant command.

“(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues including limitations.

“(3) An outline of interagency activities and initiatives.

“(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

F Nuclear Forces

Sec. 1051 Prohibition on elimination of the nuclear triad

(a)
Prohibition on triad reductions— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system if such reduction, conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the nuclear triad.
(b)
Nuclear triad defined— The term “nuclear triad” means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States composed of the following:
(1)
Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(2)
Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated ballistic missile submarines.
(3)
Nuclear-certified strategic bombers.

Sec. 1052 Limitation on availability of funds for reduction of nuclear forces

(a)
Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to carry out reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States required by the New START Treaty until—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees the plan required by section 1042(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1575); and
(2)
the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that any further reductions to such forces that result in such forces being reduced below the level required by the New START Treaty will be carried out only pursuant to—
(A)
a treaty or international agreement specifically approved with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or
(B)
an Act of Congress specifically authorizing such reductions.
(b)
Exception— The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to the following:
(1)
Reductions made to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile and strategic delivery systems, including activities related to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery systems.
(2)
Nuclear warheads that are retired or awaiting dismantlement on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3)
Inspections carried out pursuant to the New START Treaty.
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(A)
The congressional defense committees.
(B)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(2)
The term “New START Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.

Sec. 1053 Limitation on availability of funds for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe

(a)
Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be used to reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe until a period of 90 days has elapsed after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(1)
the Russian Federation has carried out similar reductions or consolidations with respect to dual-capable aircraft of Russia;
(2)
the Secretary has consulted with the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with respect to the planned reduction or consolidation of the Secretary; and
(3)
there is a consensus among such member states in support of such planned reduction or consolidation.
(b)
Dual-capable aircraft defined— In this section, the term “dual-capable aircraft” means aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions.

Sec. 1054 Statement of policy on implementation of any agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the New START Treaty; limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic delivery systems

(a)
Finding; statement of policy—
(1)
Finding— Congress finds that it was the Declaration of the United States Senate in its Resolution of Advice and Consent to the New START Treaty that “[t]he Senate declares that further arms reduction agreements obligating the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in any militarily significant manner may be made only pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States”.
(2)
Statement of policy— Congress reaffirms the Declaration described in paragraph (1) and states that any agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the New START Treaty, including those that may seek to use the Treaty’s verification regime, may only be made pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States or by Act of Congress, as set forth in the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.).
(b)
Limitation—
(1)
In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle if such action reduces the number of covered strategic delivery vehicles to less than the 800 required to implement the New START Treaty.
(2)
Waiver— In accordance with subsection (c), the President may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees written notification that—
(A)
the Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with the Russian Federation that requires Russia to significantly and proportionally reduce its number of nonstrategic nuclear warheads, or an international agreement for such purpose is entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress as set forth in the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.);
(B)
such treaty or agreement has entered into force; and
(C)
such waiver is required during such fiscal year to implement such treaty or agreement.
(c)
Additional limitations—
(1)
Certain compliance of nuclear arms control agreements— If the President makes a waiver under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle until 30 days elapses following the date on which the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees and the congressional intelligence committees written certification that the Russian Federation is in compliance with its nuclear arms control agreements and obligations with the United States.
(2)
Certain intelligence— If the President makes a waiver under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle in accordance with a treaty or international agreement entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress requiring such actions unless the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees and the congressional intelligence committees written certification that the intelligence community has high confidence judgments with respect to—
(A)
the nuclear weapons production capacity of the People’s Republic of China;
(B)
the nature, number, location, and targetability of the nuclear weapons and strategic delivery systems of China; and
(C)
the nuclear doctrine of China.
(d)
Exception— The limitations in subsection (b) and (c) shall not apply to reductions made to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile and strategic delivery systems of the United States, including activities related to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery system.
(e)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(A)
The congressional defense committees.
(B)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(2)
The term “congressional intelligence committees” means the following:
(A)
The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(B)
The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(3)
The term “covered strategic delivery vehicle” means the following:
(A)
B–52H bomber aircraft.
(B)
B–2 Spirit bomber aircraft.
(C)
Trident ballistic missile submarines.
(D)
Trident II D5 submarine launched ballistic missiles.
(E)
Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(4)
The term “New START Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.

Sec. 1055 Sense of congress on compliance with nuclear arms control agreements

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
President Obama stated in Prague in April 2009 that “Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.”.
(2)
President Obama’s Nuclear Posture Review of 2010 stated, “it is not enough to detect non-compliance; violators must know that they will face consequences when they are caught.”.
(3)
The July 2010 Verifiability Assessment released by the Department of State on the New START Treaty stated, “The costs and risks of Russian cheating or breakout, on the other hand, would likely be very significant. In addition to the financial and international political costs of such an action, any Russian leader considering cheating or breakout from the New START Treaty would have to consider that the United States will retain the ability to upload large numbers of additional nuclear warheads on both bombers and missiles under the New START, which would provide the ability for a timely and very significant U.S. response.”.
(4)
Subsection (a) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the New START Treaty of the Senate, agreed to on December 22, 2010, listed conditions of the Senate to the ratification of the New START Treaty that are binding upon the President, including the condition under paragraph (1)(B) of such subsection that requires the President to take certain actions in response to actions by the Russian Federation that are in violation of or inconsistent with such treaty, including to “seek on an urgent basis a meeting with the Russian Federation at the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing the Russian Federation into full compliance with its obligations under the New START Treaty”.
(5)
The Obama Administration demonstrated that violations of treaty obligations by other parties require corresponding action by the United States when, on November 22, 2011, the Department of State announced that the United States would “cease carrying out certain obligations under the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty with regard to Russia. This announcement in the CFE Treaty’s implementation group comes after the United States and NATO Allies have tried over the past 4 years to find a diplomatic solution following Russia’s decision in 2007 to cease implementation with respect to all other 29 CFE States. Since then, Russia has refused to accept inspections and ceased to provide information to other CFE Treaty parties on its military forces as required by the Treaty.”.
(6)
On October 17, 2012, the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives wrote a classified letter to the President stating their concerns about a major arms control violation by the Russian Federation.
(7)
The Chairmen followed up their classified letter with unclassified letters on February 14 and April 12, 2013—in their latest letter, the Chairmen stated that they expect the Administration to “directly confront the Russian violations and circumventions of this and other treaties…[we] further ask, again, for your engagement in correcting this behavior. We also seek your commitment not to undertake further reductions to the U.S. nuclear deterrent or extended deterrent until this Russian behavior is corrected. We are in full agreement with your policy as you articulated it in Prague four years ago this month, “rules must be binding, Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.””.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that the President should consider not seeking to further limit or reduce the nuclear forces of the United States, including by negotiation, with a foreign country that remains in active noncompliance with existing nuclear arms obligations, such as the Russian Federation.
(c)
Obligations of the president in the event of noncompliance— If the President determines that a foreign country is not in compliance with its obligations under a nuclear arms control agreement, treaty, or commitment to which the United States is a party or in which the United States is a participating government, including the Missile Technology Control Regime, the President shall—
(1)
immediately consult with Congress regarding the implications of such noncompliance for—
(A)
the viability of such agreement, treaty, or commitment; and
(B)
the national security interests of the United States and the allies of the United States;
(2)
submit to Congress a plan concerning the diplomatic strategy of the President to engage such foreign country at the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing such country into full compliance with such obligations; and
(3)
at the earliest date practicable following the submission of the plan under paragraph (2), submit to Congress a report detailing—
(A)
whether adherence by the United States to such obligation remains in the national security interests of the United States or the allies of the United States; and
(B)
how the United States will redress the effect of such noncompliance to the national security interests of the United States or such allies.

Sec. 1056 Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles

(a)
Deployment capability— The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of—
(1)
deploying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such missiles; and
(2)
commencing such deployment not later than 270 days after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary.
(b)
Warhead capability— The Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall ensure that—
(1)
the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed as multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with respect to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such missiles; and
(2)
such deployment is capable of being commenced not later than 270 days after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary.

Sec. 1057 Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic of China

Section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1933) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (4), by striking “August 15, 2013” and inserting “August 15, 2014”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(5) Limitation—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense notifies the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretary has entered into an agreement under paragraph (1) with a federally funded research and development center.”

Sec. 1058 Cost estimates for nuclear weapons

Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as amended by section 1041 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1931), is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)(F), by inserting “personnel,” after “maintenance,”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, including how and which locations were counted”.

Sec. 1059 Report on New START Treaty

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on whether the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D)(ii)) of title 10, United States Code) is in the national security interests of the United States.

G Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Sec. 1061 Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze captured records

(a)
In general— Chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 426 the following new section:

“427. Conflict Records Research Center

“(a) Center Authorized—The Secretary of Defense may establish a center to be known as the “Conflict Records Research Center” (in this section referred to as the “Center”).

“(b) Purposes—The purposes of the Center shall be the following:

“(1) To establish a digital research database including translations and to facilitate research and analysis of records captured from countries, organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile to the United States, with rigid adherence to academic freedom and integrity.

“(2) Consistent with the protection of national security information, personally identifiable information, and intelligence sources and methods, to make a significant portion of these records available to researchers as quickly and responsibly as possible while taking into account the integrity of the academic process and risks to innocents or third parties.

“(3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis to increase the understanding of factors related to international relations, counterterrorism, and conventional and unconventional warfare and, ultimately, enhance national security.

“(4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad national security communities, both domestic and international, on research, conferences, seminars, and other information exchanges to identify topics of importance for the leadership of the United States Government and the scholarly community.

“(c) Concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence—The Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence to the extent the efforts and activities of the Center involve the entities referred to in subsection (b)(4).

“(d) Support From Other United States Government Departments or Agencies—The head of any non-Department of Defense department or agency of the United States Government may—

“(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services, including personnel support, to support the operations of the Center; and

“(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support the operations of the Center.

“(e) Acceptance of Gifts and Donations

“(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for purposes of defraying the costs or enhancing the operations of the Center.

“(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the following:

“(A) The government of a State or a political subdivision of a State.

“(B) The government of a foreign country.

“(C) A foundation or other charitable organization, including a foundation or charitable organization that is organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country.

“(D) Any source in the private sector of the United States or a foreign country.

“(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would compromise or appear to compromise—

“(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any employee of the Department, or any member of the armed forces to carry out the responsibility or duty of the Department in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) the integrity of any program of the Department or of any person involved in such a program.

“(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting forth the criteria to be used in determining the applicability of paragraph (3) to any proposed gift or donation under this subsection.

“(f) Crediting of Funds Transferred or Accepted—Funds transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under this section shall be credited to appropriations available to the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain available until expended.

“(g) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) The term “captured record” means a document, audio file, video file, or other material captured during combat operations from countries, organizations, or individuals, now or once hostile to the United States.

“(2) The term “gift or donation” means any gift or donation of funds, materials (including research materials), real or personal property, or services (including lecture services and faculty services).”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 426 the following new item:

Sec. 1062 Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate

(a)
In general— Section 2642(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “airlift” each place it appears and inserting “transportation”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
by striking “October 28, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2019”;
(B)
by inserting and “military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales” after “Department of Defense”; and
(C)
by striking “air industry” and inserting “transportation industry”.
(b)
Technical amendment— The heading for such section is amended by striking “Airlift” and inserting “Transportation”.
(c)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2642 and inserting the following new item:

Sec. 1063 Limitation on availability of funds for modification of force structure of the Army

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of the Army may be used to modify the force structure or basing strategy of the Army until the Secretary of the Army—
(1)
submits to Congress the report on force structure required by section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943); and
(2)
provides to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the most recent force mix analysis conducted by the Secretary, including—
(A)
the assumptions and scenarios used to determine the type and mix of Brigade Combat Teams;
(B)
the rationale for the recommended force mix; and
(C)
the risks involved with the recommended force mix.

Sec. 1064 Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense by this Act or any other Act may be obligated or expended on any public-private cooperation activity undertaken by a combatant command until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the report on the conclusions of the Defense Business Board that the Secretary was directed to provide under the Report of the Committee on Armed Services to accompany H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (House Report 112–479).

Sec. 1065 Unmanned aircraft joint training and usage plan

(a)
Methods— The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration jointly shall develop and implement plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to meet the future requirements of combatant commanders and domestically to strengthen international border security.
(b)
Report— Not later than 270 days after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the status of the development of the plans and procedures required under subsection (a), including a cost benefit analysis of the shared expenses between the Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans.

H Studies and Reports

Sec. 1071 Oversight of combat support agencies

Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting “and the congressional defense committees” after “the Secretary of Defense”.

Sec. 1072 Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology

Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by striking “and” at the end;
(2)
in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate and improve research, development, test, and evaluation for humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance methods, including the transfer of relevant counter-improvised explosive device technology with potential humanitarian demining applications.”

Sec. 1073 Extension of deadline for Comptroller General report on assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense

Section 1081(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law. 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended by striking “December 30, 2013” and inserting “December 30, 2014”.

Sec. 1074 Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies

Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1582) is repealed.

Sec. 1075 Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 quadrennial defense review

(a)
In general— For purposes of conducting the assessment of the 2013 quadrennial defense review under section 118 of title 10, United States Code, the National Defense Panel established under subsection (f) of such section (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Panel”) shall—
(1)
conduct an assessment of the recommendation included in the assessment of the 2009 quadrennial defense review under such section regarding the establishment of a standing, independent strategic review panel;
(2)
include in the report required by paragraph (7) of such subsection the recommendations of the Panel regarding the establishment of such a standing panel; and
(3)
take into consideration the Strategic Choices and Management Review directed by the Secretary of Defense during 2013, particularly in carrying out the responsibilities of the Panel under clauses (i), (ii), and (v) of paragraph (5) of such subsection.
(b)
Updates from Secretary of Defense— In providing updates to the panel regarding the 2013 quadrennial defense review under paragraph (8) of such subsection, or providing information requested by the panel pursuant to paragraph (9)(A) of such subsection, the Secretary of Defense or head of the department or agency, as appropriate, shall also provide information related to the Strategic Choices and Management Review.

Sec. 1076 Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and United States Special Operations Command

(a)
In General— The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the United States Special Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and structure.
(b)
Report— Not later than the date on which the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis of each of the following:
(1)
The organizational structure of the United States Special Operations Command and each subordinate component, as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2)
The policy and civilian oversight structures for Special Operations Forces within the Department of Defense, as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act, including the statutory structures and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict within the Department.
(3)
The roles and responsibilities of United States Special Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under section 167 of title 10, United States Code.
(4)
Current and future special operations peculiar requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands, Theater Special Operations Commands, and command relationships between United States Special Operations Command and the geographic combatant commands.
(5)
The funding authorities, uses, and oversight mechanisms of Major Force Program–11.
(6)
Changes to structure, authorities, oversight mechanisms, Major Force Program–11 funding, roles, and responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review.
(7)
Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and assessment.
(c)
In general— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such review shall include an assessment of United States Special Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and force structure with respect to conventional force structures and national military strategies.

Sec. 1077 Reports on unmanned aircraft systems

(a)
Report on collaboration, demonstration, and use cases and data sharing— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following:
(1)
The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside of restricted airspace.
(2)
The progress being made to develop public and civil sense-and-avoid and command-and-control technology.
(3)
An assessment on the sharing of operational, programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems certification standards, pilot certification and licensing, and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the locations selected to collect, analyze, and store the data.
(b)
Report on resource requirements needed for unmanned aircraft systems described in the five-year roadmap— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the resource requirements needed to meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems integration described in the five-year roadmap under section 332(a)(5) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
(2)
The term “UAS Executive Committee” means the Department of Defense–Federal Aviation Administration executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Sec. 1078 Online availability of reports submitted to Congress

(a)
In general— Subsection (a)(1) of section 122a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(1) made available on a publicly accessible Internet website of the Department of Defense; and”

(b)
Effective date— The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1079 Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation plan information to Congress

(a)
In general— Section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end, the following new paragraph:

“(3) At the time of the budget submission by the President for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report containing summaries of the guidance developed under paragraphs (1) and (2), as well as summaries of any plans developed in accordance with the guidance developed under paragraph (2). Such summaries shall be sufficient to allow the congressional defense committees to evaluate fully the requirements for military forces, acquisition programs, and operations and maintenance funding in the President’s annual budget request for the Department of Defense.”

(b)
Report required— Notwithstanding the requirement under paragraph (3) of section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), that the Secretary of Defense submit reports under that paragraph at the time of the President’s annual budget submission, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the first report required under that paragraph by not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c)
Limitation on obligation of funds pending report— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended before the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report described in subsection (b).

Sec. 1080 Report on United States citizens subject to military detention

(a)
Report required— The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress an annual report on United States citizens subject to military detention. Such report shall include, for the period covered by the report, each of the following:
(1)
The name of each United States citizen subject to military detention during such period.
(2)
The legal justification for such detention of such citizen.
(3)
The steps taken to provide judicial process for or to release each such citizen.
(b)
Form of report— The report required by subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.
(c)
Availability of report— The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be made available to all members of Congress.
(d)
Savings clause— Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize or express approval for subjecting United States citizens to military detention.

Sec. 1080A Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report released in April by the Air Force in 2001.

Sec. 1080B Report on long-term costs of operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

(a)
Report requirement— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, with contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to Congress a report containing an estimate of previous costs of Operation New Dawn (the successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom) and the long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom for a scenario, determined by the President and based on current contingency operation and withdrawal plans, that takes into account expected force levels and the expected length of time that members of the Armed Forces will be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(b)
Estimates to be used in preparation of report— In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the President shall make estimates and projections through at least fiscal year 2023, adjust any dollar amounts appropriately for inflation, and take into account and specify each of the following:
(1)
The total number of members of the Armed Forces expected to be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including—
(A)
the number of members of the Armed Forces actually deployed in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Enduring Freedom;
(B)
the number of members of reserve components of the Armed Forces called or ordered to active duty in the United States for the purpose of training for eventual deployment in Southwest Asia, backfilling for deployed troops, or supporting other Department of Defense missions directly or indirectly related to Operation Enduring Freedom; and
(C)
the break-down of deployments of members of the regular and reserve components and activation of members of the reserve components.
(2)
The number of members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who have previously served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom and who are expected to serve multiple deployments.
(3)
The number of contractors and private military security firms that have been used and are expected to be used during the course of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(4)
The number of veterans currently suffering and expected to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental injuries.
(5)
The number of veterans currently in need of and expected to be in need of prosthetic care and treatment because of amputations incurred during service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(6)
The current number of pending Department of Veterans Affairs claims from veterans of military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the total number of such veterans expected to seek disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(7)
The total number of members of the Armed Forces who have been killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties, the total number of members expected to suffer injuries in Afghanistan, and the total number of members expected to be killed in Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties.
(8)
The amount of funds previously appropriated for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the Department of Veterans Affairs for costs related to Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, including an account of the amount of funding from regular Department of Defense, Department of State, and Department of Veterans Affairs budgets that has gone and will go to costs associated with such operations.
(9)
Previous, current, and future operational expenditures associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and, when applicable, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn, including—
(A)
funding for combat operations;
(B)
deploying, transporting, feeding, and housing members of the Armed Forces (including fuel costs);
(C)
activation and deployment of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces;
(D)
equipping and training of Iraqi and Afghani forces;
(E)
purchasing, upgrading, and repairing weapons, munitions, and other equipment consumed or used in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom; and
(F)
payments to other countries for logistical assistance in support of such operations.
(10)
Past, current, and future costs of entering into contracts with private military security firms and other contractors for the provision of goods and services associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.
(11)
Average annual cost for each member of the Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including room and board, equipment and body armor, transportation of troops and equipment (including fuel costs), and operational costs.
(12)
Current and future cost of combat-related special pays and benefits, including reenlistment bonuses.
(13)
Current and future cost of calling or ordering members of the reserve components to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(14)
Current and future cost for reconstruction, embassy operations and construction, and foreign aid programs for Iraq and Afghanistan.
(15)
Current and future cost of bases and other infrastructure to support members of the Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan.
(16)
Current and future cost of providing health care for veterans who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom, including—
(A)
the cost of mental health treatment for veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, and other mental problems as a result of such service; and
(B)
the cost of lifetime prosthetics care and treatment for veterans suffering from amputations as a result of such service.
(17)
Current and future cost of providing Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits for the lifetime of veterans who incur disabilities while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(18)
Current and future cost of providing survivors’ benefits to survivors of members of the Armed Forces killed while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom.
(19)
Cost of bringing members of the Armed Forces and equipment back to the United States upon the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom, including the cost of demobilization, transportation costs (including fuel costs), providing transition services for members of the Armed Forces transitioning from active duty to veteran status, transporting equipment, weapons, and munitions (including fuel costs), and an estimate of the value of equipment that will be left behind.
(20)
Cost to restore the military and military equipment, including the equipment of the reserve components, to full strength after the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom.
(21)
Amount of money borrowed to pay for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, and the sources of that money.
(22)
Interest on money borrowed, including interest for money already borrowed and anticipated interest payments on future borrowing, for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom.

I Other Matters

Sec. 1081 Technical and clerical amendments

(a)
Title 10— Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1)
The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and inserting the following:
(2)
Section 122a(a) is amended by striking “subsection (b) is” and inserting “subsection (b) is—”.
(3)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and inserting the following new item:
(4)
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item:
(5)
Section 231a(a) is amended by striking “fiscal year of Defense” and inserting “fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense”.
(6)
Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the end of the enumerator of section 498.
(7)
Section 494(c) is amended by striking “the date of the enactment of this Act” each place it appears and inserting “December 31, 2011”.
(8)
Section 673(a) is amended by inserting “of the Uniform Code of Military Justice” after “120c”.
(9)
Section 1401a is amended by striking “before the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008” in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting “before January 28, 2008”.
(10)
Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period at the end.
(11)
Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking “the a” and inserting “the”.
(b)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013— Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by striking “Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)” and inserting “Section 2366b(a)(3)(F)”.
(2)
Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking “subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively” and inserting “subsection (f) as subsection (g)”.
(3)
Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking “Section 408a(e)” and inserting “Section 478a(e)”.
(4)
Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking “such Act” and inserting “such section”.
(5)
Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat.1918) is amended by striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv).
(6)
Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat.1919) is amended by striking “Section 1031(b)” and inserting “Section 1041(b)”.
(7)
Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat.1969) is amended by striking “paragraph (1)” and inserting “paragraph (2)”.
(8)
Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking “fiscal” both places it appears and inserting “Fiscal”.
(9)
Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended—
(A)
in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking “inserting “; and”;” and inserting “inserting a semicolon;”; and
(B)
in subsection (i), by inserting after “it appears” the following: “(except in those places in which “Administrator of FEMA” already appears)”.
(c)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012— Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended as follows:
(1)
Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by striking “subsection (D)” and inserting “subsection (d)”.
(2)
Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended “experts sexual” and inserting “experts in sexual”.
(d)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004— Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 note), as most recently amended by section 321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1694), is amended by striking “subsection 4703” and inserting “section 4703”.
(e)
Amendment to title 41— Section 4712(i) is amended by inserting before “the enactment” the following: “that is 180 days after the date”.
(f)
Coordination with other amendments made by this Act— For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any amendment made by other provisions of this Act.

Sec. 1082 Transportation of supplies for the United States by aircraft operated by United States air carriers

(a)
Department of Defense—
(1)
In general— Chapter 157 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the following new section:

“2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft

“(a) Preference—Only aircraft owned by the United States, or aircraft operated by or under the supervision of United States air carriers holding a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 and registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, may be used for the transportation by air of supplies on behalf of any component of the Department of Defense. However, if the President finds that the rates charged for the use of those aircraft is excessive or otherwise unreasonable, contracts for transportation may be made as otherwise provided by law. Charges made for the transportation of those supplies by those aircraft may not be higher than the charges made for transporting like goods for private persons.

“(b) Outsize and oversize cargoes

“(1) The preference under subsection (a) shall not apply to outsize or oversize cargoes if no air carrier registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet nor any aircraft owned by the United States are available and capable of transporting such a cargo.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, outsize and oversize cargoes are transported by aircraft owned and operated by the United States or by air carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.

“(3) Not later than March 30 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on outsize and oversize cargo flights. Each such report shall include, for the year covered by the report, each of the following:

“(A) The number of outsize and oversize cargo flights, including the number of flights and tonnage of each flight, flown both by aircraft owned and operated by the United States and by carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.

“(B) For any cargo carried by aircraft that is neither owned and operated by the United States nor by an air carrier in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, an explanation for the use of such a carrier.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2631a the following new item:
(b)
Other departments and agencies—
(1)
In general— Chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“40131. Air transportation procured by the United States Government

“(a) Guarantee—Consistent with the provisions of section 40118 of title 49, when the United States procures, enters into a contract or subcontract for, or otherwise obtains for its own account, or furnishes to or for the account of a foreign country, organization, or person without provision for reimbursement, any equipment, materials, or commodities, or provides financing in any way with Federal funds for the account of any person unless otherwise exempted, within or without the United States, or advances funds or credits, or guarantees the convertibility of foreign currencies in connection with the furnishing or obtaining of the equipment, materials, or commodities, the appropriate agencies shall take steps necessary and practicable to ensure that at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of the equipment, materials, or commodities which may be transported on fixed wing aircraft are transported on privately-owned commercial aircraft that are owned, operated, or otherwise supervised by air carriers holding a certificate under section 41102 of this title and registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, to the extent those aircraft are appropriate and available at fair and reasonable rates.

“(b) Exception

“(1) In general—The requirements of this section shall not apply to any equipment, materials, or commodities transported for the use of the military services of the United States or to respond to a humanitarian disaster.

“(2) Humanitarian disaster defined—For purposes of this subsection, the term “humanitarian disaster” means a man-made or natural occurrence that causes loss of life, health, property, or livelihood, inflicting severe destruction and distress.

“(c) Waiver

“(1) In general—The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, may issue a temporary waiver of this section—

“(A) to respond to an emergency; or

“(B) if such a waiver is in the national interests of the United States.

“(2) Committee notice—The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall notify the following Committees within 30 days of exercising a waiver under paragraph (1):

“(A) The Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

“(B) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

“(C) The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

“(D) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

“(E) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

“(3) Expiration and renewal of waiver—Any waiver issued under paragraph (1) shall expire not later than 180 days after the date on which it is issued. The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate, may renew an expired or expiring waiver as long as the President or Secretary provides notice to the committees referred to in paragraph (2) in accordance with that paragraph.

“(d) Regulations—Each department or agency of the Government shall administer its air transport operations according to regulations and guidance issued by the Secretary of Transportation.

“(e) Enforcement—The Secretary of Transportation may impose on any person violating this section, or a regulation issued under this section, a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for each violation knowingly committed, with each day of a continuing violation following the initial shipment to be a separate violation.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

Sec. 1082A Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from nonprofit organizations

(a)
In general— Chapter 20 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 402 the following new section:

“403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations

“(a) Authorization of transportation—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may transport to any country, without charge, supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit organization and that are intended for distribution to members of the armed forces. Such supplies may be transported only on a space available basis.

“(b) Limitations

“(1) The Secretary may not transport supplies under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines that—

“(A) the transportation of the supplies is consistent with the policies of the United States;

“(B) the supplies are suitable for distribution to members of the armed forces and are in usable condition;

“(C) there is a legitimate need for the supplies by the members of the armed forces for whom they are intended; and

“(D) adequate arrangements have been made for the distribution and use of the supplies.

“(2) Procedures—The Secretary shall establish procedures for making the determinations required under paragraph (1). Such procedures shall include inspection of supplies before acceptance for transport.

“(3) Preparation—It shall be the responsibility of the nonprofit organization requesting the transport of supplies under this section to ensure that the supplies are suitable for transport.

“(c) Distribution—Supplies transported under this section may be distributed by the United States Government or a nonprofit organization.

“(d) Definition of nonprofit organization—In this section, the term “nonprofit organization” means an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code.”

(b)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402 the following new item:

Sec. 1083 Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs

(a)
Extension of a program defined— Section 2445a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) Extension of a program—In this chapter, the term “extension of a program” means, with respect to a major automated information system program or other major information technology investment program, the further deployment or planned deployment to additional users of the system which has already been found operationally effective and suitable by an independent test agency or the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the scope planned in the original estimate or information originally submitted on the program.”

(b)
Reports on critical changes in MAIS programs— Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraph (3)”;
(2)
by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):

“(2) Notification when variance due to congressional action or extension of program—If a senior Department of Defense official who, following receipt of a quarterly report described in paragraph (1) and making a determination described in paragraph (3), also determines that the circumstances resulting in the determination described in paragraph (3) either (A) are primarily the result of congressional action, or (B) are primarily due to an extension of a program, the official may, in lieu of carrying out an evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense committees, within 45 days after receiving the quarterly report, a notification that the official has made those determinations. If such a notification is submitted, the limitation in subsection (g)(1) does not apply with respect to that determination under paragraph (3).”

(c)
Conforming cross-reference amendment— Subsection (g)(1) of such section is amended by striking “subsection (d)(2)” and inserting “subsection (d)(3)”.
(d)
Total acquisition cost information— Title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1)
in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking “development costs” and inserting “total acquisition costs”; and
(2)
in section 2445c—
(A)
in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking “program development cost” and inserting “total acquisition cost”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking “program development cost” and inserting “total acquisition cost”.
(e)
Clarification of cross-reference— Section 2445c(g)(2) of such title is amended by striking “in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d)(2)” and inserting “under subsection (d)(1)(B)”.

Sec. 1084 Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance

Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by inserting “(a) In General.—” before “The authority”;
(2)
by striking “this chapter” and inserting “any provision of this chapter other than section 44305”; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(b) Insurance of United States Government property—The authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government under section 44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018.”

Sec. 1085 Revision of compensation of members of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force

(a)
Revision— Section 365(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat.1705) is amended—
(1)
by striking “shall be compensated” and inserting “may be compensated”;
(2)
by striking “equal to” and inserting “not to exceed”; and
(3)
by inserting “of $155,400” after “annual rate”.
(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed on or after April 2, 2013.

Sec. 1086 Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems

(a)
Certification required— Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall submit to the congressional defense committees certification that defense critical assets designated as tier one task critical assets (hereinafter referred to as “TCAs”) that receive power supply from commercial or other non-military sources are protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. Any such assets found not to be so protected shall be included in the plan required under subsection (b).
(b)
Plan required— Not later than January 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for tier one TCAs to receive electricity by means that are protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. The plan shall include the following elements:
(1)
An analysis of how the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, plans to mitigate any risks to mission assurance for non-certified tier one TCAs, including any steps that may be needed for remediation.
(2)
The development or adoption by the Department, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, of a standard of resistance or protection against man-made and natural electromagnetic threats for electricity sources that supply electricity to tier one TCAs.
(3)
The development by the Department, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, of a strategy to certify by December 31, 2015, that all electricity sourced to tier one TCAs is provided by facilities that meet the standard developed under paragraph (2).
(c)
Preparation of plan— In preparing the plan required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall use the guidance and recommendations of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack established by section 1401 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–345).
(d)
Form of submission— The plan required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in classified form.
(e)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
The term “task critical asset” means an asset of such extraordinary importance to operations in peace, crisis, and war that its incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on the ability of the Department of Defense to fulfill its missions.
(2)
The term “tier one” with respect to a task critical asset means such an asset the loss, incapacitation, or disruption of which could result in mission (or function) failure at the Department of Defense, military department, combatant command, sub-unified command, Defense Agency, or defense infrastructure sector level.

Sec. 1087 Strategy for future military information operations capabilities

(a)
Strategy required— The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a strategy for developing and sustaining military information operations capabilities for future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later than February 1, 2014.
(b)
Contents of strategy— The strategy required in subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1)
A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities that have been developed during the ten-year period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, including such capabilities developed using funds authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
(2)
A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in paragraph (1) are being integrated into both operational plans (OPLANS) and contingency plans (CONPLANS).
(3)
An assessment of the force structure that is necessary to support operational planning and potential contingency operations, including the relative balance across the active and reserve components.
(4)
Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to support the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as well as estimates for resources that might be needed based on selected OPLANS and CONPLANS.
(5)
A description of how new and emerging technologies can be incorporated into the projected force structure and future OPLANS and CONPLANS.
(6)
A description of new capabilities that may be needed to fill any identified gaps and programs that might be required to develop such capabilities.

Sec. 1088 Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing standards

In implementing the sequester required by section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as ordered on March 1, 2013, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all military departments remain fully compliant with minimum safe staffing standards, as outlined in the Department of Defense Fire and Emergency Services Program (DoD Instruction 6055.06).

Sec. 1089 Determination and Disclosure of Transportation Costs Incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States

(a)
Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary— In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1)
determine the cost of the transportation provided with respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
(2)
not later than 10 days after completion of the trip involved, provide a written statement of the cost—
(A)
to the Member, officer, or employee involved; and
(B)
to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
(3)
upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary’s official public website until the expiration of the 4-year period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
(b)
Exceptions—
(1)
Exceptions described— This section does not apply with respect to any trip for which any of the following applies:
(A)
The purpose of the trip is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
(B)
The use of transportation provided by the Department of Defense is necessary to protect the safety and security of the individuals taking the trip.
(2)
Consultation— In determining whether or not a trip is described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Speaker of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Majority Leader of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate).
(c)
Definitions— In this section:
(1)
Member— The term Member, with respect to the House of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
(2)
United States— The term United States means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(d)
Effective Date— This section shall apply with respect to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to any trip which began prior to such date.

Sec. 1090 Transfer or loan of equipment to the Department of Homeland Security relating to border security

The Secretary of Defense may coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify and provide for the transfer or long-term loan to the Department of Homeland Security of equipment the Secretary of Defense determines to be excess and the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be appropriate in order to increase situational awareness and achieve operational control of the international borders of the United States.

Sec. 1091 Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered Aerostat Radar System

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than September 30, 2013, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to accept from the Secretary of Defense, full contract ownership and management responsibilities for the existing Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program and contracts. Neither the Department of Defense nor the Department of Homeland Security shall be required to reimburse the other agency for any services under the TARS program.

Sec. 1092 Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities

Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting “border security activities and” before “law enforcement activities”; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), by inserting “, the Secretary of Homeland Security,” after “Attorney General”; and
(2)
in subsection (d), by inserting “border security activities or” before “counter-drug”.

Sec. 1093 Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace

(a)
Memoranda of understanding— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access nonregulatory special use airspace if such access—
(1)
is used by the entity as part of such test range program; and
(2)
does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the Department of Defense.
(b)
Established procedures— The Secretary shall carry out subsection (a) using the established procedures of the Department of Defense with respect to entering into a memorandum of understanding.
(c)
Construction— A memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team member of such entity in the test range program specified in such subsection.

Sec. 1094 Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain Federal property

Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection:

“(c) Days for Flag Display—For the purposes of this section, POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the flag of the United States is displayed.”

Sec. 1095 Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the use of improvised explosive devices (in this section referred to as “IEDs”) against members of the Armed Forces or people of the United States should be condemned;
(2)
unwavering support for members of the Armed Forces, first responders, and explosive ordnance disposal personnel of the United States who face the threat of IEDs and put their lives on the line to defeat them should be expressed;
(3)
all relevant agencies of the Government should be called on to coordinate with international partners and other responsible entities to reduce the use of IEDs and curb their proliferation; and
(4)
the exchange of blast trauma research data should be facilitated between all relevant agencies of the Government.

Sec. 1096 Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and military reserve force

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The first volunteer militia unit in America was formed in 1636 in Massachusetts Bay, followed by other units in the colonies of Virginia and Connecticut. the American founding fathers wrote article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution to keep the militia model, authorizing a standing military force that could organize, train, and equip militia volunteers when needed.
(2)
In World War I, nearly all National Guardsmen were mobilized into Federal service, and while they represented only 15 percent of the total United States Army, they comprised 40 percent of the American divisions sent to France and sustained 43 percent of the casualties in combat. In World War II, the National Guard comprised 19 Army divisions and 29 observation squadrons with aircraft assigned to the United States Army Air Forces.
(3)
On September 11, 2001, the first fighter jets over New York City and Washington, DC, were Air National Guard F–15 and F–16 aircraft from Massachusetts and North Dakota, with over 400 more Air National Guard fighter aircraft on alert by that afternoon. Over 600,000 Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have deployed in the many campaigns since 9/11.
(4)
Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have been involved in countless domestic response missions, including missions in response to hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and forest fires including the more recent events of Superstorm Sandy and the tornados in Oklahoma.
(5)
The volunteer National Guard and Reserve have time and again demonstrated their readiness to meet operational requirements through cost-effective means.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the Secretary of Defense should make every effort to ensure the Military Reserve and National Guard forces are sustained by a fully manned and fully funded force and that the United States fulfill its longstanding commitment to unyielding readiness in terms of defense;
(2)
the Secretary of Defense should act with the knowledge that the National Guard and Reserve are critical components to the Armed Forces, particularly as means of preserving combat power during a time of budget austerity; and
(3)
Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the National Guard or Reserve and affirms the growth of these components as circumstances warrant.

Sec. 1097 Access of employees of congressional support offices to department of defense facilities

(a)
Finding— Congress finds that Congressional support offices perform a critical role in enabling Congress to carry out its Constitutionally-mandated task of performing oversight of the executive branch.
(b)
Access in Same Manner as Employees of Defense Committees— The Secretary of Defense shall provide employees of any Congressional support office who work on issues related to national security with access to facilities of the Department of Defense in the same manner, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as employees of the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate.
(c)
Congressional support offices defined— In this section, the term “Congressional support office” means any of the following:
(1)
The Congressional Budget Office.
(2)
The Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress.
(3)
The Government Accountability Office.

Sec. 1098 Cost of wars

The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Sec. 1099 Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and cultures in the building of partner capacity

It is the sense of Congress that the head of each element of the Department of Defense should take into consideration foreign languages and cultures during the development by such element of the Department of training, tools, and methodologies to engage in military-to-military activities and in the building of partner capacity.

Sec. 1099A Sense of Congress regarding preservation of Second Amendment rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in the District of Columbia

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(2)
Approximately 40,000 servicemen and women across all branches of the Armed Forces either live in or are stationed on active duty within the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Unless these individuals are granted a waiver as serving in a law enforcement role, they are subject to the District of Columbia’s onerous and highly restrictive laws on the possession of firearms.
(3)
Military personnel, despite being extensively trained in the proper and safe use of firearms, are therefore deprived by the laws of the District of Columbia of handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are commonly kept by law-abiding persons throughout the United States for sporting use and for lawful defense of their persons, homes, businesses, and families.
(4)
The District of Columbia has one of the highest per capita murder rates in the Nation, which may be attributed in part to previous local laws prohibiting possession of firearms by law-abiding persons who would have otherwise been able to defend themselves and their loved ones in their own homes and businesses.
(5)
The Gun Control Act of 1968 (as amended by the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act) and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere. In addition, existing District of Columbia criminal laws punish possession and illegal use of firearms by violent criminals and felons. Consequently, there is no need for local laws that only affect and disarm law-abiding citizens.
(6)
On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, and thus ruled that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban and requirements that rifles and shotguns in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or outfitted with a trigger lock to be unconstitutional.
(7)
On July 16, 2008, the District of Columbia enacted the Firearms Control Emergency Amendment Act of 2008 (D.C. Act 17–422; 55 DCR 8237), which places onerous restrictions on the ability of law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms, thus violating the spirit by which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller.
(8)
On February 26, 2009, the United States Senate adopted an amendment on a bipartisan vote of 62–36 by Senator John Ensign to S. 160, the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009, which would fully restore Second Amendment rights to the citizens of the District of Columbia.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that active duty military personnel who are stationed or residing in the District of Columbia should be permitted to exercise fully their rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and therefore should be exempt from the District of Columbia’s restrictions on the possession of firearms.

XI Civilian Personnel Matters

Sec. 1101 One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas

Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking “through 2013” and inserting “through 2014”.

Sec. 1102 One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1104 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 125 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking “2014” and inserting “2015”.

Sec. 1103 Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of Department of Defense

Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.

Sec. 1104 Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees

Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “October 1, 2014” and inserting “October 1, 2018”.

Sec. 1105 Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program

Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “the amount determined” and all that follows through “room and board” and inserting “an amount determined by the Secretary of Defense”.

Sec. 1106 Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel

(a)
In general— Section 1110(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is amended by striking “2013.” and inserting “2023.”.
(b)
Reporting requirement— Section 1110(i) of such Act is amended by striking “2015,” and inserting “2024,”.

Sec. 1107 Defense Science Initiative for Personnel

(a)
Statement of policy— It is the policy of the United States to assure the scientific and technological preeminence of its defense laboratories, which are essential to the national security, by requiring the Department of Defense to provide to its science and technology laboratories—
(1)
the personnel and support services needed to carry out their mission; and
(2)
decentralized management authority.
(b)
Establishment of Initiative— There is hereby established within the Department of Defense a program to be known as the Defense Science Initiative for Personnel (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Initiative”).
(c)
Laboratories covered by Initiative— The laboratories covered by the Initiative—
(1)
shall be those designated as Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories (hereinafter in this section referred to as “STRLs”) by the Secretary or by paragraph (2); and
(2)
shall include the laboratories enumerated in section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), which laboratories are hereby designated as STRLs.
(d)
Science and engineering degreed and technical positions at STRLs—
(1)
In general— The director of any STRL may appoint qualified candidates, without regard to sections 3309–3319 of title 5, United States Code, directly to scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical positions within such STRL, on either a temporary, term, or permanent basis.
(2)
Qualified candidate defined— Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, for purposes of this subsection, the term “qualified candidate” means an individual who is—
(A)
a candidate who has earned a bachelor’s or master’s degree;
(B)
a student enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate instruction leading to a bachelor’s or master’s degree in a scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical course of study at an institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)); or
(C)
a veteran, as defined in section 2108 of title 5, United States Code, who served in the armed forces in an engineering, scientific, or medical technician occupational specialty.
(3)
Rule of construction— Any exercise of authority under paragraph (1) shall be considered to satisfy section 2301(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
(e)
Exclusion from personnel limitations, etc— The director of any STRL shall manage the workforce strength of such STRL—
(1)
without regard to any limitation on appointments or any allocation of positions with respect to such STRL, subject to paragraph (2); and
(2)
in a manner consistent with the budget available with respect to such STRL.
(f)
Senior Executive Service rotation authority— Section 3131 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (5), by striking “mission;” and inserting “mission, subject to paragraph (15);”;
(2)
in paragraph (13), by striking “and” at the end;
(3)
in paragraph (14), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(4)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(15) permit the director of each Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014) to determine the duration of appointments for senior executives (which shall in no event be less than 5 years), consistent with carrying out the mission of that laboratory.”

(g)
Senior scientific technical managers—
(1)
Establishment— There is hereby established in each STRL a category of senior professional scientific positions, the incumbents of which shall be designated as “senior scientific technical managers” and which shall be positions classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule pursuant to section 5108 of title 5, United States Code. The primary functions of such positions shall be—
(A)
to engage in research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and
(B)
to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities.
(2)
Appointments— The positions described in paragraph (1) may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of the STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the Department of Defense, except that the director of the laboratory involved shall determine the number of such positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 3 percent of the number of scientists and engineers (determined on a full-time equivalent basis) employed at such laboratory at the end of the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which any appointments subject to that numerical limitation are made.
(h)
Selection and compensation of specially-qualified scientific and professional personnel— Section 3104 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) In addition to the number of positions authorized by subsection (a), the director of each Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014), may establish, without regard to the second sentence of subsection (a), such number of scientific or professional positions as may be necessary to carry out the research and development functions of the laboratory and which require the services of specially-qualified personnel. The selection process governing appointments made under this subsection shall be determined by the director of the laboratory involved, and the rate of basic pay for the employee holding any such position shall be set by the laboratory director at a rate not to exceed the rate for level II of the Executive Schedule.”

Sec. 1108 Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel

(a)
Regulations— No later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations implementing the authority in subsection (a) of section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.).
(b)
Coordination— The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for coordinating the preparation of the regulations required under subsection (a).
(c)
Limitations— The regulations required under subsection (a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time equivalent or end-strength limitation, nor shall such regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian full-time equivalents, or end-strength.

Sec. 1109 Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the armed forces

(a)
Extension— Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” both places it appears and inserting “December 31, 2020”.
(b)
Repeal of fulfilled requirement— Such section is further amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (b); and
(2)
by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by subsection (a), as subsection (b).
(c)
Repeal of references to certain title 5 authorities— Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended—
(1)
by striking “sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 5” and inserting “section 3304 of title 5”; and
(2)
in clause (ii), by striking “the authorities in such sections” and inserting “the authority in such section”.

XII Matters relating to foreign nations

A Assistance and training

Sec. 1201 Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces

(a)
Authority— Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by section 1206 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4625), is further amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by striking “or” at the end;
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) support the theater security priorities of a Geographic Combatant Commander.”

(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s security forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.”

(b)
Annual funding limitation— Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as so amended, is further amended by striking “$350,000,000” and inserting “$425,000,000”.
(c)
Notification of planning and execution of funds— Subsection (e) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1979), is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4);
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

“(3) Notification of planning and execution of funds—In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2016, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following:

“(A) For programs to be conducted or supported under subsection (a) (other than subsection (a)(1)(C)) for such fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and execution of not less than 50 percent of the total amount of funds to be made available for such programs.

“(B) For programs to be conducted or supported under subsection (a)(1)(C) for such fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and execution of 100 percent of the total amount of funds to be made available for such programs.”

(3)
in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking “Committee on International Relations” and inserting “Committee on Foreign Affairs”.
(d)
Termination of program— Subsection (g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by striking “2014” each place it appears and inserting “2016”.
(e)
Repeal of authority to build the capacity of certain counterterrorism forces in Yemen and East Africa— Section 1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1980) is hereby repealed.

Sec. 1202 Three-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities

Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2016”.

Sec. 1203 Global Security Contingency Fund

(a)
Authority— Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended—
(1)
in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “or regions” after “countries”; and
(2)
in paragraph (1)—
(A)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “and other national security forces” and inserting “or other national security forces”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by striking “and counterterrorism operations” and inserting “or counterterrorism operations”; and
(ii)
by striking “and” at the end and inserting “or”.
(b)
Notices to congress— Subsection (l) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(l) Notices to Congress—Not less than 30 days before initiating an activity under a program of assistance under subsection (b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit to the specified congressional committees a notification that includes the following:

“(1) A request for the transfer of funds into the Fund under subsection (f) or any other authority, including the original source of the funds.

“(2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated program plan for each country to include total anticipated costs and the specific activities contained therein.

“(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and anticipated completion date for the activity.

“(4) A list of other security-related assistance or justice sector and stabilization assistance that the United States is currently providing the country concerned and that is related to or supported by the activity.

“(5) Such other information relating to the program or activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.”

(c)
Transitional authorities; annual reports; guidance and processes for exercise of authority— Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
by striking subsection (n);
(2)
by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and
(3)
by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the following new subsection:

“(m) Guidance and processes for exercise of authority—The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit a report to the specified congressional committees 15 days after the date on which the necessary guidance has been issued and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b). The Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports not later than 15 days after the date on which any future modifications to the guidance and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are issued.”

(d)
Funding— Subsection (o) of such section is amended by striking “(o) funding.—” and all that follows through “(2) fiscal years 2013 and after.—” and inserting “(o) funding.—”.

Sec. 1204 Codification of National Guard State Partnership Program

(a)
State Partnership Program—
(1)
In general— Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“116. State Partnership Program

“(a) Purposes of program—The purposes of the State Partnership Program of the National Guard are the following:

“(1) To support the objectives of the commander of the combatant command for the theater of operations in which such contacts and activities are conducted.

“(2) To support the objectives of the United States chief of mission of the partner nation with which contacts and activities are conducted.

“(3) To build international partnerships and defense and security capacity.

“(4) To strengthen cooperation between the departments and agencies of the United States Government and agencies of foreign governments to support building of defense and security capacity.

“(5) To facilitate intergovernmental collaboration between the United States Government and foreign governments in the areas of defense and security.

“(6) To facilitate and enhance the exchange of information between the United States Government and foreign governments on matters relating to defense and security.

“(b) Availability of appropriated funds for program

“(1) Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense, including funds appropriated for the Air and Army National Guard, shall be available for the payment of costs incurred by the National Guard to conduct activities under the State Partnership Program, whether those costs are incurred inside or outside the United States.

“(2) Costs incurred by the National Guard and covered under paragraph (1) may include the following:

“(A) Costs of pay and allowances of members of the National Guard.

“(B) Travel and necessary expenses of United States personnel outside of the Department of Defense in support of the State Partnership Program.

“(C) Travel and necessary expenses of foreign participants directly supporting activities under the State Partnership Program.

“(c) Limitations on use of funds

“(1) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for activities conducted in a foreign country unless jointly approved by—

“(A) the commander of the combatant command concerned; and

“(B) the chief of mission concerned, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.

“(2) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for the participation of a member of the National Guard in activities in a foreign country unless the member is on active duty in the armed forces at the time of such participation.

“(3) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for interagency activities involving United States civilian personnel or foreign civilian personnel unless the participation of such personnel in such activities—

“(A) contributes to responsible management of defense resources;

“(B) fosters greater respect for and understanding of the principle of civilian control of the military;

“(C) contributes to cooperation between the United States armed forces and civilian governmental agencies and foreign military and civilian government agencies; or

“(D) improves international partnerships and capacity on matters relating to defense and security.

“(d) Reimbursement

“(1) In the event of the participation of United States Government participants (other than personnel of the Department of Defense) in activities for which payment is made under subsection (b), the head of the department or agency concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of Defense for the costs associated with the participation of such personnel in such contacts and activities.

“(2) Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the appropriation or account from which amounts for the payment concerned were derived. Any amounts so deposited shall be merged with amounts in such appropriation or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation or account.

“(e) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) The term State Partnership Program means a program that establishes a defense and security relationship between the National Guard of a State or territory and the military and security forces, and related disaster management, emergency response, and security ministries, of a foreign country.

“(2) The term activities, for purposes of the State Partnership Program, means any military-to-military activities or interagency activities for a purpose set forth in subsection (a)(1).

“(3) The term “interagency activities” means the following:

“(A) Contacts between members of the National Guard and foreign civilian personnel outside the ministry of defense of the foreign country concerned on a matter within the core competencies of the National Guard.

“(B) Contacts between United States civilian personnel and members of the military and security forces of a foreign country or foreign civilian personnel on a matter within the core competencies of the National Guard.

“(4) The term matter within the core competencies of the National Guard means matters with respect to the following:

“(A) Disaster response and mitigation.

“(B) Defense support to civil authorities.

“(C) Consequence management and installation protection.

“(D) Response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosives (CBRNE) event.

“(E) Border and port security and cooperation with civilian law enforcement.

“(F) Search and rescue.

“(G) Medicine.

“(H) Counter-drug and counter-narcotics activities.

“(I) Public affairs.

“(J) Employer support and family support for reserve forces.

“(5) The term United States civilian personnel means the following:

“(A) Personnel of the United States Government (including personnel of departments and agencies of the United States Government other than the Department of Defense) and personnel of State and local governments of the United States.

“(B) Members and employees of the legislative branch of the United States Government.

“(C) Non-governmental individuals.

“(6) The term foreign civilian personnel means the following:

“(A) Civilian personnel of a foreign government at any level (including personnel of ministries other than ministries of defense).

“(B) Non-governmental individuals of a foreign country.”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(b)
Repeal of superseded authority— Section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1205 Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of certain foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region

(a)
Authority— The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide assistance to the military and civilian response organizations of Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Turkey, and other countries in the region of Syria in order for such countries to respond effectively to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region.
(b)
Authorized elements— Assistance provided under this section may include training, equipment, and supplies.
(c)
Availability of funds for activities across fiscal years— The Secretary of Defense may use up to $4,000,000 of the funds made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for a fiscal year to carry out the program authorized in subsection (a) and may provide assistance under such program that begins in that fiscal year but ends in the next fiscal year.
(d)
Report— Not later than 60 days after the date on which the authority of subsection (a) is first exercised, and annually thereafter through December 31, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives an annual report to include at least the following:
(1)
A detailed description by country of assistance provided.
(2)
An overview of how such assistance fits into, and is coordinated with, other United States efforts to build the capability and capacity of countries in the region of Syria to counter the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region.
(3)
A listing of equipment and supplies provided to countries in the region of Syria.
(4)
Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State determine appropriate.
(e)
Expiration— The authority provided under subsection (a) may not be exercised after September 30, 2015.

Sec. 1206 One-year extension of authority to support foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord's Resistance Army

(a)
Funding— Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624) is amended—
(1)
by striking “fiscal years 2012 and 2013” and inserting “fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014”; and
(2)
by striking “for operation and maintenance” and inserting “to provide additional operation and maintenance funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces as specified in the funding table in section 4302”.
(b)
Expiration— Subsection (h) of such section is amended by striking “September 30, 2013” and inserting “September 30, 2014”.

Sec. 1207 Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense

(a)
In general— Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, up to 5 percent of such amounts may be made available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal year 2014.
(b)
Briefing— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on mechanisms to evaluate the programs conducted pursuant to the authorities listed in subsection (a). The briefing shall include the following:
(1)
A description of how the Department of Defense evaluates program and project outcomes and impact, including cost effectiveness and extent to which programs meet designated goals.
(2)
An analysis of steps taken to implement the recommendations from the following reports:
(A)
The Government Accountability Office’s Report entitled “Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed to Manage the Military’s Efforts”.
(B)
The Department of Defense Inspector General Report numbered “DODIG–2012–119”.
(C)
The RAND Corporation’s Report prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense entitled “Developing a Prototype Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance Projects”.
(c)
Definition— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(1)
The congressional defense committees.
(2)
The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

B Matters relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

Sec. 1211 One-year extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations

(a)
Extension of authority— Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further amended by striking “for fiscal year 2013” and inserting “for fiscal year 2014”.
(b)
Limitation on amounts available— Subsection (d) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by striking “during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,650,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000”; and
(2)
in paragraph (3), by striking “Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “Fiscal Year 2014”.
(c)
Limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan in fiscal year 2014 pending certification on Pakistan—
(1)
In general— Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act, and no amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years before fiscal year 2014 that remain available for obligation, may be used for reimbursements of Pakistan under the authority in subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as amended by this section, until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees each of the following:
(A)
That Pakistan is maintaining security and is not through its actions or inactions at any level of government limiting or otherwise restricting the movement of United States equipment and supplies along the Ground Lines of Communications (GLOCs) through Pakistan to Afghanistan so that such equipment and supplies can be transshipped and such equipment and supplies can be retrograded out of Afghanistan.
(B)
That Pakistan is taking demonstrable steps to—
(i)
support counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremists groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in Pakistan;
(ii)
disrupt the conduct of cross-border attacks against United States, coalition, and Afghanistan security forces located in Afghanistan by such groups (including the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban) from bases in Pakistan;
(iii)
counter the threat of improvised explosive devices, including efforts to attack improvised explosive device networks, monitor known precursors used in improvised explosive devices, and systematically address the misuse of explosive materials (including calcium ammonium nitrate) and accessories and their supply to legitimate end-users in a manner that impedes the flow of improvised explosive devices and improvised explosive device components into Afghanistan; and
(iv)
conduct cross-border coordination and communication with Afghan security forces and United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.
(C)
That Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority groups for their legitimate and nonviolent political and religious beliefs, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim.
(2)
Waiver authority— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees in writing that the waiver is in the national security interests of the United States and includes with such certification a justification for the waiver.

Sec. 1212 One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1218 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1990), is further amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
by striking “$35,000,000” and inserting “$25,000,000”; and
(B)
by striking “for fiscal year 2013” and inserting “for fiscal year 2014”; and
(2)
in subsection (e), by striking “December 31, 2013” and inserting “December 31, 2014”.

Sec. 1213 Extension of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan

(a)
One year extension—
(1)
In general— Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), is amended by striking “fiscal year 2013” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal year 2014”.
(2)
Conforming amendment— The heading of subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”.
(b)
Amount of funds available during fiscal year 2014— Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking “$200,000,000” and inserting “$60,000,000”.

Sec. 1214 Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq

(a)
Limitation on amount— Subsection (c) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631), as amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1982), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2012” and all that follows and inserting “fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $209,000,000.”.
(b)
Source of funds— Subsection (d) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
by striking “fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”; and
(2)
by striking “fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may be,” and inserting “that fiscal year”.
(c)
Additional Authority for the Activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq— Subsection (f) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(1)
by striking “fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”; and
(2)
by striking “and Counter Terrorism Service”.

Sec. 1215 One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan

Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended—
(1)
in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) Up to $279,000,000 made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2014.”

(2)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(i)
by striking “fiscal year 2011” and inserting “fiscal year 2013”; and
(ii)
by inserting “, or phase of a project,” after “each project”;
(B)
by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); and
(C)
by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:

“(C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for such project after January 1, 2015, including ANSF force levels required to secure the project. Such assessment should include the estimated costs of providing security and whether or not the Government of Afghanistan is committed to providing such security.”

(3)
in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until September 30, 2015.”

Sec. 1216 Special immigrant visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies

(a)
Protection for Afghan allies— Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking “on or after October 7, 2001,” and inserting “during the period beginning on October 7, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2014,”;
(2)
in paragraph (2)(D), by adding at the end the following: “A principal alien described in subparagraph (A) seeking special immigrant status under this section shall apply for an approval described in this subparagraph not later than September 30, 2015.”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3)(A), by striking “2013.” and inserting “2013, and may not exceed 435 for each of fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.”.
(b)
Special immigrant status for certain Iraqis— Section 1244(a)(1) of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “on or before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014;”.

Sec. 1217 Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan

(a)
Requirement to withhold assistance to Afghanistan— An amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
(b)
Waiver authority— The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in Afghanistan.
(c)
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance.
(d)
Department of Defense assistance defined— In this section, the term “Department of Defense assistance” means funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors.

Sec. 1218 Improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program

The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended—
(1)
in section 1242, by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:

“(c) Improved application process—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014,”

(2)
in section 1244, as amended by this Act, is further amended—
(A)
by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

“(a) In general—Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Homeland Security, or, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of State in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, may provide an alien described in subsection (b) with the status of a special immigrant under section 101(a)(27) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(27)), and shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, ensure efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa, if the alien—

(B)
in subsection (b)—
(i)
in paragraph (4) by adding at the end the following:

“(A) Review process for denial by chief of mission

“(i) In general—An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval required by subparagraph (A) shall—

“(I) receive a written decision; and

“(II) be provided 120 days from the date of the decision to request reopening of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information.

“(ii) Senior coordinator—The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Baghdad, Iraq, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given—

“(I) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and

“(II) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in clause (i) receives the information described in clause (i)(I).”

(3)
in section 1248, by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Report on Improvements

“(1) In general—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, to—

“(A) the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate;

“(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;

“(C) the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and

“(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

“(2) Contents—The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall describe the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), including information relating to—

“(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall—

“(i) support immigration security; and

“(ii) provide for the orderly processing of such applications without delay;

“(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this subtitle;

“(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under section 1244 during each month of the preceding fiscal year;

“(D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months;

“(E) the total number of applications that are pending due to the failure—

“(i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission;

“(ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360;

“(iii) to conduct a visa interview; or

“(iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien;

“(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E);

“(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and

“(H) a breakdown of reasons for denials at by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission.

“(g) Public quarterly reports—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed, including information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) of subsection (f)(2).”

Sec. 1219 Improvement of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program

Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
in subparagraph (D)—
(i)
by adding at the end the following:

“(ii) Review process for denial by chief of mission

“(I) In general—An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval shall—

“(aa) receive a written decision; and

“(bb) be provided 120 days from the date of receipt of such opinion to request reconsideration of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information.

“(II) Senior coordinator—The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Kabul, Afghanistan, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given—

“(aa) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and

“(bb) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in subclause (I) receives the information described in subclause (I)(aa).”

(2)
in paragraph (4)—
(A)
in the heading, by striking “Prohibition on fees” and inserting “Application process”;
(B)
by striking “The Secretary” and inserting the following:

“(A) In general—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under paragraph (1) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 6 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa.

“(B) Prohibition on fees—The Secretary”

(4)
by adding at the end the following:

“(12) Report on improvements—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, that describes the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection, including information relating to—

“(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall—

“(i) support immigration security; and

“(ii) provide for the orderly processing of such applications without delay;

“(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this section;

“(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under this subsection during each month of the preceding fiscal year;

“(D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months;

“(E) the total number of applications that are pending due to the failure—

“(i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission;

“(ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360;

“(iii) to conduct a visa interview; or

“(iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien;

“(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E);

“(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and

“(H) a breakdown of reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission.

“(13) Public quarterly reports—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection are processed, including information described in subparagraph (C) through (H) of paragraph (12).”

Sec. 1220 Sense of congress

(a)
Purpose— Expressing the Sense of the House or Representatives that the Special Immigration Visa programs authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 and the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 are critical to the United States national security, and that these programs must be reformed and extended in order to meet the Congressional intent with which they were created.
(b)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Congress created the Special Immigration Visa program for the purposes of protecting and aiding the many brave Iraqis and Afghans whose lives, and the lives of their families, were endangered as a result of their faithful and valuable service to the United States during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.
(2)
The Iraq Special Immigrant Visa program is set to expire at the end of fiscal year 2013.
(3)
The Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa program is set to expire at the end of fiscal year 2014.
(4)
Despite the pending expiration of the Special Immigrant Visa programs, many brave Iraqis, Afghans, and their families, continue to face ongoing and serious threats as a result of their employment by or on behalf of the United States Government.
(5)
Between FY08–FY12, only 22 percent of the available Iraqi SIVs (5,500 visas out of 25,000 visas) have been issued and 12 percent of the available Afghan SIVs (1,051 visas out of 8,500 visas) have been issued.
(6)
As the Washington Post reported in October 2012, over 5,000 documentarily complete Afghan SIV applications remained in a backlog.
(7)
The implementation of the Special Immigration Visa programs has been protracted and inefficient.
(8)
The application and approval process for the Special Immigration Visa program is unnecessarily opaque and difficult to navigate.
(9)
Applicants in both Iraq and Afghanistan often have effusive recommendations from numerous military personnel, have served the United States war efforts for many years, and have served valiantly, in some instances literally taking a bullet for a United States service member, and yet are denied approval for a Special Immigration Visa with little to no transparency.
(10)
Overly narrow provisions contained in the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 leave many deserving Afghans and their families in need of United States assistance, but unable to access the Special Immigration Visa program.
(11)
The United States has a responsibility to follow through on its promise to protect those Iraqis and Afghans who have risked their lives to aid our troops and protect America’s security.
(12)
The extension and reform of the Iraq and Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa programs is a matter of national security.
(13)
The extension and reform of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program is essential to the United States mission in Afghanistan.
(c)
Sense of the House— It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Iraq and Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa programs should be—
(1)
reformed by—
(A)
ensuring applications are processed in a timely, and transparent fashion;
(B)
providing parity between the two Special Immigrant Visa programs so that Afghan principal applicants, like Iraqi principal applicants, are able to include their spouse, children, siblings, and parents; and
(C)
expanding eligibility for the Special Immigrant Visa programs to Afghan or Iraqi men and women employed by, or on behalf of, a media or nongovernmental organization headquartered in the United States, or an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Iraq or Afghanistan that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement; and
(2)
extended in—
(A)
Iraq through the year 2018, without authorizing any additional Special Immigrant Visas as authorized in the original statue; and
(B)
Afghanistan through the year 2018, without authorizing any additional Special Immigrant Visas as authorized in the original statue.

C Matters relating to Afghanistan post 2014

Sec. 1221 Modification of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan

(a)
In general— Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended by section 1214(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1986), is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections:

“(f) Matters to be included: Redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan—The report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed description of the following matters relating to the redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan:

“(1) The number and a description of United States Armed Forces redeployed, vehicles and equipment redeployed, and bases closed during the reporting period.

“(2) A summary of tasks and functions conducted by the United States Armed Forces or the Department of Defense that have been transferred to other United States Government departments and agencies, Afghan Government ministries and agencies, other foreign governments, or nongovernmental organizations, or discontinued during the reporting period. The summary shall include a discussion of the formal and informal arrangements and working groups that have been established to coordinate and execute the transfer of such tasks and functions.

“(g) Matters to be included: Assessment of capability of ANSF to provide operations and maintenance functions—The report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide operations and maintenance functions for infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF after January 1, 2015, including—

“(1) a description of training provided to the ANSF by the United States and the International Security Assistance Force;

“(2) a comprehensive evaluation of operations and maintenance capabilities and skills; and

“(3) the Government of Afghanistan’s financial wherewithal to perform or contract out such functions.”

(b)
Effective date— The amendments made this section apply with respect to any report required to be submitted under section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385) on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1222 Completion of accelerated transition of United States combat and military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan

(a)
In general— It is the policy of the United States that, in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries, and other allies in Afghanistan, the President shall—
(1)
complete the accelerated transition of United States combat operations to the Government of Afghanistan by not later than December 31, 2013;
(2)
complete the accelerated transition of United States military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan and redeploy United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan (including operations involving military and security-related contractors) by not later than December 31, 2014; and
(3)
pursue robust negotiations leading to a political settlement and reconciliation of the internal conflict in Afghanistan, to include the Government of Afghanistan, all interested parties within Afghanistan and with the observance and support of representatives of donor nations active in Afghanistan and regional governments and partners in order to secure a secure and independent Afghanistan and regional security and stability.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that should the President determine the necessity to maintain United States troops in Afghanistan to carry out missions after December 31, 2014, and such presence and missions should be authorized by a separate vote of Congress not later than June 1, 2014.
(c)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the President to—
(1)
modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations of United States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces redeploy from Afghanistan;
(2)
attack Al Qaeda forces wherever such forces are located;
(3)
provide financial support and equipment to the Government of Afghanistan for the training and supply of Afghanistan military and security forces; or
(4)
gather, provide, and share intelligence with United States allies operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Sec. 1223 Defense intelligence plan

(a)
Plan required— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a Department of Defense plan regarding covered defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan shall include—
(1)
a description of the covered defense intelligence assets;
(2)
a description of any such assets to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to support military operations;
(3)
a description of any such assets that will be or have been reallocated to other locations outside of the United States in support of the Department of Defense;
(4)
the defense intelligence priorities that will be or have been addressed with the reallocation of such assets from Afghanistan;
(5)
the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance plans to operate in the locations where such assets will be or have been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host country agreements; and
(6)
a description of any such assets that will be or have been returned to the United States.
(b)
Covered defense intelligence assets defined— In this section, the term “covered defense intelligence assets” means Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1224 Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan

(a)
Reintegration activities and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan—
(1)
In general— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to carry out the provisions of law described in paragraph (2) until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d).
(2)
Provisions of law— The provisions of law referred to in paragraph (1) are the following:
(A)
Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392; relating to authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan).
(B)
Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan).
(b)
Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to carry out section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619; relating to the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan), $45,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d).
(c)
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, $2,615,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d).
(d)
Certification described— The certification referred to in subsections (a), (b), and (c) is a certification of the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement that—
(1)
protects the Department of Defense, its military and civilian personnel, and contractors from liability to pay any tax, or similar charge, associated with efforts to carry out missions in the territory of Afghanistan that have been agreed to by both the Government of the United States and the Government of Afghanistan;
(2)
ensures exclusive jurisdiction for the United States over United States Armed Forces located in Afghanistan;
(3)
ensures that there is no infringement on the right of self-defense of the United States military mission or United States military personnel in Afghanistan;
(4)
ensures that the United States military in Afghanistan is permitted to take the efforts deemed necessary to protect other United States Government offices and personnel in Afghanistan as may be required;
(5)
ensures that the United States military mission in Afghanistan has sufficient access to bases and basing rights as may be necessary to carry out the activities in Afghanistan that the President has assigned to the military; and
(6)
ensures that the United States has the freedom of movement to carry out those military missions as may be required to continue the effort to defeat al Qaeda and its associated forces.
(e)
Specified congressional committees— In this section, the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1225 Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or bases in Afghanistan

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended by the United States Government to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.

D Matters relating to Iran

Sec. 1231 Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries

(a)
In general— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
(b)
Matters to be included— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An explanation of the steps that the Department of Defense is taking to improve the interoperability of United States-Gulf Cooperation Council countries missile defense systems.
(2)
An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and restrictions on United States operations.
(3)
An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts to long-term, sustainable funding sources.
(c)
Form— The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex, if necessary.

Sec. 1232 Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran

(a)
In general— Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2542) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (C), by striking “and” at the end;
(2)
in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:

“(E) a description of the strategy and structure of the global Iranian Threat Network and an assessment of the capability of such Network and how such Network operates to reinforce Iran’s grand strategy;

“(F) a description of the gaps in intelligence of the Department of Defense with respect to Iran and a prioritization of those gaps in intelligence by operational need; and

“(G) an analysis of how sanctions on Iran are effecting its military capability and its ability to export terrorism to proxy groups within its Threat Network.”

(b)
Effective date— The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, on or after that date.

Sec. 1233 Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
In response to U.S. Central Command requirements, the United States Navy has maintained, on average, more than one aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf for more than five years.
(2)
In February 2013, the senior leadership of the Department of Defense elected to reduce the number of aircraft carriers deployed to the Arabian Gulf in light of budget constraints and limitation of the overall carrier force structure to support the two aircraft carrier requirement.
(3)
In reference to the decision to indefinitely delay the deployment of the USS Harry Truman, CVN 75, and the USS Gettysburg, its cruiser escort, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Martin Dempsey stated, “We’re trying to stretch our readiness out by keeping this particular carrier in homeport in our global response force, so if something happens elsewhere in the world, we can respond to it. Had we deployed it and “consumed” that readiness, we could have created a situation where downstream we wouldn’t have a carrier present in certain parts of the world at all.”.
(4)
Highlighting the risks of having only one aircraft carrier in the region and relying on land-based aircraft, General Dempsey stated, “When you have carrier-based aircraft, you have complete autonomy and control over when you use them. When you use land-based aircraft, you often have to have host-nation permission to use them.”.
(5)
Addressing the perception of the United States commitment to the region, General James Mattis, Commander of U.S. Central Command, testified in March 2013, “Perhaps the greatest risk to U.S. interests in the region is a perceived lack of an enduring U.S. commitment to collective interests and the security of our regional partners.”. He went on to testify that, “The drawdown of our forces can be misinterpreted as a lack of attention, a lack of commitment to the region.”.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
maintaining only one aircraft carrier battle group in the Arabian Gulf constrains United States’ options and could put at risk the ability to have diversified platforms from which to defend the Arabian Gulf and, if necessary, to conduct military operations to prevent Iran from threatening the United States, United States allies, or Iran’s neighbors with nuclear weapons;
(2)
it is in the interests of the United States to maintain both land-based and sea-based capabilities in the region to project force;
(3)
land-based locations in the region could restrict United States military options and critically impact the operational capability if required to conduct a defense of the Arabian Gulf because the United States has not finalized bilateral security agreements with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries;
(4)
as a result of these and other critical limitations associated with maintaining one aircraft carrier battle group in the Arabian Gulf, United States military commanders have expressed concerns about the operational constraints, the increasing uncertainty among United States allies, and the emboldening of potential adversaries such as Iran;
(5)
regarding the ability of the United States Navy to maintain a two aircraft carrier presence in the Arabian Gulf, the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert, stated, “We need 11 carriers to do the job. That’s been pretty clearly written, and that’s underwritten in our defense strategic guidance.”.
(6)
the United States should construct and sufficiently sustain a fleet of at least eleven aircraft carriers and associated battle force ships in order to meet current and future requirements and to support at least a two aircraft carrier battle group presence in the Arabian Gulf, in addition to meeting other operational requirements; and
(7)
the United States should finalize bilateral agreements with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries that support the Defense of the Arabian Gulf requirements, at the earliest possible date.

Sec. 1234 Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in Southwest Asia

Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended—
(1)
in the first sentence, by inserting after “programs” the following: “and integrated air and missile defense programs”; and
(2)
in the second sentence, by striking “post-undergraduate flying and tactical leadership” and inserting “such”.

Sec. 1235 Statement of Policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
In 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 2000, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2013, Congress declared that it deplored the religious persecution by the Government of Iran of the Baha’i community and would hold the Government of Iran responsible for upholding the rights of all Iranian nationals, including members of the Baha’i faith.
(2)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, “The Baha’i community has long been subject to particularly severe religious freedom violations in Iran. Baha’is, who number at least 300,000, are viewed as “heretics” by Iranian authorities and may face repression on the grounds of apostasy.”.
(3)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, “Since 1979, Iranian government authorities have killed more than 200 Baha’i leaders in Iran and dismissed more than 10,000 from government and university jobs.”.
(4)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, “Baha’is may not establish places of worship, schools, or any independent religious associations in Iran.”.
(5)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, “Baha’is are barred from the military and denied government jobs and pensions as well as the right to inherit property. Their marriages and divorces also are not recognized, and they have difficulty obtaining death certificates. Baha’i cemeteries, holy places, and community properties are often seized or desecrated, and many important religious sites have been destroyed.”.
(6)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, “The Baha’i community faces severe economic pressure, including denials of jobs in both the public and private sectors and of business licenses. Iranian authorities often pressure employers of Baha’is to dismiss them from employment in the private sector.”.
(7)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, “The government prohibits Baha’is from teaching and practicing their faith and subjects them to many forms of discrimination that followers of other religions do not face.”.
(8)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, “According to law, Baha’i blood is considered “mobah”, meaning it can be spilled with impunity.”.
(9)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated that “members of religious minorities, with the exception of Baha’is, can serve in lower ranks of government employment”, and “Baha’is are barred from all leadership positions in the government and military”.
(10)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, “Baha’is suffered frequent government harassment and persecution, and their property rights generally were disregarded. The government raided Baha’i homes and businesses and confiscated large amounts of private and commercial property, as well as religious materials belonging to Baha’is.”.
(11)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, “Baha’is also are required to register with the police”.
(12)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated that “[p]ublic and private universities continued to deny admittance to and expelled Baha’i students” and “[d]uring the year, at least 30 Baha’is were barred or expelled from universities on political or religious grounds”.
(13)
The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, “Baha’is are regularly denied compensation for injury or criminal victimization.”.
(14)
On March 6, 2012, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/19/66), which stated that “the Special Rapporteur continues to be alarmed by communications that demonstrate the systemic and systematic persecution of members of unrecognized religious communities, particularly the Baha’i community, in violation of international conventions” and expressed concern regarding “an intensive defamation campaign meant to incite discrimination and hate against Baha’is”.
(15)
On May 23, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General issued a report, which stated that “the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief * * * pointed out that the Islamic Republic of Iran had a policy of systematic persecution of persons belonging to the Baha’i faith, excluding them from the application of freedom of religion or belief by simply denying that their faith had the status of a religion”.
(16)
On August 22, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General issued a report, which stated, “The international community continues to express concerns about the very serious discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities in law and in practice, in particular the Baha’i community. The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran expressed alarm about the systemic and systematic persecution of members of the Baha’i community, including severe socioeconomic pressure and arrests and detention. He also deplored the Government’s tolerance of an intensive defamation campaign aimed at inciting discrimination and hate against Baha’is.”.
(17)
On September 13, 2012, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/67/369), which stated, “Reports and interviews submitted to the Special Rapporteur also continue to portray a disturbing trend with regard to religious freedom in the country. Members of both recognized and unrecognized religions have reported various levels of intimidation, arrest, detention and interrogation that focus on their religious beliefs.”, and stated, “At the time of drafting the report, 105 members of the Baha’i community were reported to be in detention.”.
(18)
On November 27, 2012, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly adopted a draft resolution (A/C.3/67/L.51), which noted, “[I]ncreased persecution and human rights violations against persons belonging to unrecognized religious minorities, particularly members of the Baha’i faith and their defenders, including escalating attacks, an increase in the number of arrests and detentions, the restriction of access to higher education on the basis of religion, the sentencing of twelve Baha’is associated with Baha’i educational institutions to lengthy prison terms, the continued denial of access to employment in the public sector, additional restrictions on participation in the private sector, and the de facto criminalization of membership in the Baha’i faith.”.
(19)
On December 20, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution (A/RES/67/182), which called upon the government of Iran “[t]o eliminate discrimination against, and exclusion of * * * members of the Baha’i Faith, regarding access to higher education, and to eliminate the criminalization of efforts to provide higher education to Baha’i youth denied access to Iranian universities,” and “to accord all Baha’is, including those imprisoned because of their beliefs, the due process of law and the rights that they are constitutionally guaranteed”.
(20)
On February 28, 2013, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/22/56), which stated, “110 Bahai’s are currently detained in Iran for exercising their faith, including two women, Mrs. Zohreh Nikayin and Mrs. Taraneh Torabi, who are reportedly nursing infants in prison”.
(21)
In March and May of 2008, intelligence officials of the Government of Iran in Mashhad and Tehran arrested and imprisoned Mrs. Fariba Kamalabadi, Mr. Jamaloddin Khanjani, Mr. Afif Naeimi, Mr. Saeid Rezaie, Mr. Behrouz Tavakkoli, Mrs. Mahvash Sabet, and Mr. Vahid Tizfahm, the seven members of the ad hoc leadership group for the Baha’i community in Iran.
(22)
In August 2010, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran sentenced the seven Baha’i leaders to 20-year prison terms on charges of “spying for Israel, insulting religious sanctities, propaganda against the regime and spreading corruption on earth”.
(23)
The lawyer for these seven leaders, Mrs. Shirin Ebadi, the Nobel Laureate, was denied meaningful or timely access to the prisoners and their files, and her successors as defense counsel were provided extremely limited access.
(24)
These seven Baha’i leaders were targeted solely on the basis of their religion.
(25)
Beginning in May 2011, Government of Iran officials in four cities conducted sweeping raids on the homes of dozens of individuals associated with the Baha’i Institute for Higher Education (BIHE) and arrested and detained several educators associated with BIHE.
(26)
In October 2011, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran sentenced seven of these BIHE instructors and administrators, Mr. Vahid Mahmoudi, Mr. Kamran Mortezaie, Mr. Mahmoud Badavam, Ms. Nooshin Khadem, Mr. Farhad Sedghi, Mr. Riaz Sobhani, and Mr. Ramin Zibaie, to prison terms for the crime of “membership of the deviant sect of Baha’ism, with the goal of taking action against the security of the country, in order to further the aims of the deviant sect and those of organizations outside the country”.
(27)
Six of these educators remain imprisoned, with Mr. Mortezaie serving a 5-year prison term and Mr. Badavam, Ms. Khadem, Mr. Sedghi, Mr. Sobhani, and Mr. Zibaie serving 4-year prison terms.
(28)
Since October 2011, four other BIHE educators, Ms. Faran Hessami, Mr. Kamran Rahimian, Mr. Kayvan Rahimian, and Mr. Shahin Negari have been sentenced to 4-year prison terms, which they are now serving.
(29)
The efforts of the Government of Iran to collect information on individual Baha’is have recently intensified as evidenced by a letter, dated November 5, 2011, from the Director of the Department of Education in the county of Shahriar in the province of Tehran, instructing the directors of schools in his jurisdiction to “subtly and in a confidential manner” collect information on Baha’i students.
(30)
The Baha’i community continues to undergo intense economic and social pressure, including an ongoing campaign in the town of Semnan, where the Government of Iran has harassed and detained Baha’is, closed 17 Baha’i owned businesses in the last three years, and imprisoned several members of the community, including three mothers along with their infants.
(31)
Ordinary Iranian citizens who belong to the Baha’i faith are disproportionately targeted, interrogated, and detained under the pretext of national security.
(32)
The Government of Iran is party to the International Covenants on Human Rights and is in violation of its obligations under the Covenants.
(b)
Statement of policy— Congress—
(1)
condemns the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority and its continued violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights;
(2)
calls on the Government of Iran to immediately release the seven imprisoned leaders, the ten imprisoned educators, and all other prisoners held solely on account of their religion; and
(3)
calls on the President and Secretary of State, in cooperation with responsible nations, to immediately condemn the Government of Iran’s continued violation of human rights and demand the immediate release of prisoners held solely on account of their religion.

E Reports and other matters

Sec. 1241 Report on posture and readiness of United States Armed Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and the Middle East

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, may have never occurred or could have been prevented had there been an international stabilizing force following NATO-led operations in order to help stabilize the country, build capacity within the security forces, and pursue terrorist groups that threaten the local government as well as United States interests;
(2)
the attack also highlighted the limitations of the United States military to alert, deploy, and decisively counter a no-notice terrorist attack such as the one in Benghazi, or another security contingency, due to the limitations stemming from United States military posture in Africa and the Middle East and when there is a lack of a layered defense at United States diplomatic facilities;
(3)
the United States military is more effectively able to respond to terrorist attacks on United States facilities outside of the United States if the responding United States military assets are forward deployed;
(4)
when an intelligence threat assessment determines that a United States facility overseas is vulnerable to attack, such facility should have robust force protection measures sufficient to safeguard personnel and assets until a United States military response can arrive;
(5)
the continually evolving terrorist threat to United States interests on the Continent of Africa and the Middle East necessitates that the United States military maintains a forward deployed posture in Europe, Middle East, and Africa in order to be able to respond to terrorist events, or other security contingencies, and to effectively evacuate and recover United States personnel;
(6)
the United States military, in conjunction with the Department of State and the intelligence community, should continue to evaluate the assumptions underpinning the terrorist threat in order to ensure that it is effectively able to respond globally to future terrorist attacks;
(7)
the United States military should regularly re-evaluate the posture and alert status requirements of its crisis response elements in order to be more responsive to the evolving and global nature of the terrorist threat, and all United States military crisis response elements should be fully equipped with the required supporting capabilities to conduct their missions;
(8)
on April 16, 2013, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified before the House Appropriations Committee that the military is, “* * * adapting our force posture to a new normal of combustible violence in North Africa and in the Middle East”;
(9)
The President stated in a press conference on May 16, 2013, “I have directed the Defense Department to ensure that our military can respond lightening quick in times of crisis.”;
(10)
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs should continue to evaluate the posture of United States forces to respond to the global terrorist threat, including an evaluation of whether United States Africa Command should have forces and necessary equipment permanently assigned to the command to respond more promptly to this “new normal”; and
(11)
although the Department of State-initiated Accountability Review Board found that the Marine Security Guard program should be expanded and that there should be greater coordination between the Department of Defense and the Department of State to identify additional resources for security at high risk posts, the United States military may be challenged to provide additional security to Department of State facilities due to budget shortfalls, on-going force structure constraints, and increasing operational requirements for the Department of Defense.
(b)
Report required—
(1)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the posture and readiness of United States Armed Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and the Middle East.
(2)
Matters to be included— The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A)
An assessment of terrorist groups and other non-state groups that threaten United States interests and facilities in Africa, including a description of the key assumptions underpinning such assessment.
(B)
A description of the readiness, posture, and alert status of relevant United States Armed Forces in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the United States and any changes implemented or planned to be implemented since the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, to respond to the “new normal” and President Obama’s directive for the military to respond “lightening quick” in times of crisis.
(C)
In consultation with the Secretary of State, a description of new or modified requirements of the Department of State, if any, for—
(i)
United States Marine Security Guard Detachments;
(ii)
any other Department of Defense assets to provide enhanced security at Department of State facilities;
(iii)
an explanation of how any new requirements for Marine Security Detachments or other Department of Defense assets affect the capacity of the Armed Forces, including specifically the capacity of the Marine Corps, to fulfill Department of Defense operational requirements; and
(iv)
an explanation of how any unfulfilled requirements for Marine Security Detachments would adversely impact security at Department of State facilities.
(3)
Definition— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1242 Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security

(a)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
Egypt is undergoing a significant political transition and the ultimate outcome of this political process and its implications for United States national security interests remain uncertain;
(2)
the United States continues to have considerable concerns about the intentions and actions of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and whether the government of President Morsi is committed to a pluralistic, democratic Egypt;
(3)
the United States has a stake in Egypt becoming a mature, pluralistic democracy in which the rights of Egyptian citizens, including women and minorities, are protected;
(4)
the United States should continue to closely monitor President Morsi’s support for the peace treaty with the Government of Israel, which has been a stabilizing force in the region for over 30 years;
(5)
the United States military relationship with the Egyptian military is long-standing and should remain a key pillar to, and component of, United States engagement with Egypt;
(6)
the close military-to-military relationship between the United States and Egypt has been a critical component in enabling counterterrorism cooperation between the two governments to ensure the United States military has freedom of movement throughout the region in order to deter aggression and respond to threats to United States national security interests, particularly in light of the security situation in Libya and the Sinai;
(7)
the Egyptian military has exercised restraint and professionalism during the unrest in Egypt over the last two years and hopefully will remain a key mechanism through which the United States can support the people of Egypt in achieving their goals for a representative and democratic political system, while promoting peace and security in the region; and
(8)
therefore, with appropriate vetting, United States military assistance and support to the Egyptian military should continue, even as civilian aid to Egypt receives greater scrutiny as a result of the uncertainty associated with Egypt’s current political leadership and economic policies.
(b)
Plan required—
(1)
In general— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a comprehensive plan for United States military assistance and cooperation with Egypt.
(2)
Matters to be included— The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, a detailed description of the following:
(A)
How United States security assistance and cooperation enables—
(i)
freedom of movement for the United States military throughout the region; and
(ii)
the Government of Egypt to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda, affiliated groups, and other terrorist organizations, whether based in and operating from Egyptian territory or the region.
(B)
The capacity of the Government of Egypt to prevent the illicit movement of terrorists, criminals, weapons, and other dangerous material across Egypt’s borders or administrative boundaries, including through tunnels and other illicit points of entry into Gaza.
(C)
The extent to which the Egyptian military is—
(i)
supporting the protection of the political, economic, and religious freedoms and human rights of all citizens and residents in Egypt, including those involved in Egyptian civil society and democratic promotion efforts through nongovernmental organizations;
(ii)
supporting credible and legitimate elections in Egypt;
(iii)
supporting the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty;
(iv)
taking effective steps to eliminate smuggling networks and to detect and destroy tunnels between Egypt and Gaza; and
(v)
supporting action to combat terrorism in the Sinai.
(D)
A description of the strategic objectives of the United States regarding the provision of United States security assistance to the Government of Egypt.
(E)
A description of biennial outlays of United States security assistance to the Government of Egypt for the purposes of strategic planning, training, provision of equipment, and construction of facilities, including funding streams.
(F)
A description of vetting and end-user monitoring systems in place by both Egypt and the United States for defense articles and training provided by the United States, including human rights vetting.
(G)
A description of actions that the Government of Egypt is taking to—
(i)
repudiate, combat, and stop incitement to violence against the United States and United States citizens and prohibit the transmission within its domains of satellite television or radio channels that broadcast such incitement; and
(ii)
adopt and implement legal reforms that protect the religious and democratic freedoms of all citizens and residents of Egypt.
(H)
Recommendations, including with respect to required resources and actions, to maximize the effectiveness of United States security assistance provided to Egypt.
(3)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(c)
GAO report— Not later than 120 days after the date of the submission of the report required under subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that—
(1)
reviews and comments on the report required under subsection (b); and
(2)
provides recommendations regarding additional actions with respect to the provision of United States security assistance to Egypt, if necessary.

Sec. 1243 Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (“North Korea”) has escalated regional tensions with hostile rhetoric and provocative actions.
(2)
North Korea threatened a nuclear attack on the United States and a resumption of open war against the Republic of Korea (“South Korea”).
(3)
North Korea’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs constitute a threat to the national security of the United States and to regional stability.
(4)
On April 14, 2009, North Korea halted negotiations regarding its nuclear weapons program when it abandoned the Six-Party Talks with the People’s Republic of China (“China”), Japan, the Russian Federation (“Russia”), South Korea, and the United States.
(5)
On May 25, 2009, North Korea detonated a nuclear device in an underground explosive test.
(6)
On March 26, 2010, North Korea sank a South Korean naval vessel, the Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
(7)
On November 23, 2010, North Korea shelled the border island of Yeonpyeong-do, killing four people. This was the first direct artillery attack on South Korean territory since the signing of the 1953 armistice.
(8)
On April 13, 2012, North Korea conducted a rocket launch that failed to send a satellite into orbit. This launch violated United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions 1718 and 1874.
(9)
On December 12, 2012, North Korea used banned long-range missile technology to launch an earth observation satellite into orbit. In response, the UNSC unanimously adopted Resolution 2087, condemning the launch.
(10)
On February 12, 2013, North Korea conducted a third underground nuclear test in violation of UNSC Resolution 1718, 1874, and 2087. The test also contravened North Korea’s commitments under the September 2005 Joint Statement of the Six-Party Talks.
(11)
On March 7, 2013, the UNSC unanimously adopted Resolution 2094, condemning North Korea’s third nuclear test and imposed additional sanctions against the regime.
(12)
On March 28, 2013, North Korea unilaterally nullified the armistice agreement with the United States that suspended military conflict on the Korean peninsula.
(13)
On March 30, 2013, North Korea declared a state of war with South Korea.
(14)
On April 4, 2013, North Korea placed two intermediate-range Musudan missiles on mobile launchers and temporarily relocated them to the eastern coast of the Korean peninsula before removing them a month later from the launch sites.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States and its allies, South Korea and Japan, share the goal of a stable and peaceful Korean Peninsula, free of nuclear weapons;
(2)
the United States remains committed to defending its allies in the Asia-Pacific region and stability in Northeast Asia requires restraint by all parties from activities that would complicate international relations or escalate international tensions, and international disputes should be mitigated in a constructive manner consistent with established principles of international law;
(3)
Congress supports—
(A)
the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner,
(B)
North Korea’s abandonment of its nuclear programs and return to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards; and
(C)
North Korea’s full acceptance of and compliance with the terms of the 1953 Armistice Agreement;
(4)
the United States has national interests in security and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, the implementation of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, nuclear non-proliferation efforts, the promotion of respect for the fundamental human rights of the North Korean people, international cyber-security cooperation, and full implementation of United States and multilateral sanctions against illicit activities;
(5)
the United States encourages China and Russia to fully implement and enforce United States and United Nations Security Council sanctions against North Korea; and
(6)
the President, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully informed on security developments on the Korean Peninsula.

Sec. 1244 Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The Republic of Georgia is a highly valued ally of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
(2)
The peaceful transfer of power as the result of the free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in October 2012 represents a major accomplishment toward the Georgian people’s creation of a free society and full democracy.
(3)
However, since the October 2012 parliamentary elections the new Georgian Government has taken a series of measures against former officials and members of the current political opposition that appear to be motivated by political considerations.
(4)
Over 100 former Georgian Government officials have been charged with criminal violations since the October 2012 parliamentary elections.
(5)
Similar charges have been filed against members of the political opposition, including Vano Merabishvili, the Secretary General of the United National Movement.
(6)
The arrest of the leader of an opposition party is especially troubling, particularly its chilling effect on political freedom prior to the presidential election scheduled for October 2013.
(7)
The Georgian Government has taken insufficient action to prevent further violence against members of the United National Movement and to punish offenders.
(8)
These actions call into question the Georgian Government’s continued progress toward the creation of a free and democratic society in which basic freedoms, including freedom for political opposition, are guaranteed.
(b)
Statement of Congress— Congress declares that—
(1)
the United States remains committed to assisting the people of Georgia in establishing a free and democratic society in their country;
(2)
the measures taken by the Georgian Government against former officials and political opponents, apparently in part motivated by political considerations, may have a significant negative impact on cooperation between the United States and Georgia, including efforts to build a stronger relationship in political, economic, and security matters, as well as progress on integrating Georgia into international organizations;
(3)
the United States must be unambiguous when democratic backsliding occurs in a key ally after a peaceful and democratic transfer of power between political parties; and
(4)
the people of the United States and the Members of Congress express their deepest condolences to the Georgian people on the tragic loss of seven soldiers of Georgia in a suicide bombing on June 6, 2013, and the deaths of three soldiers killed in another suicide bombing on May 13, 2013, while they were supporting United States and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Sec. 1245 Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers

(a)
Limitation— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to plan, prepare, establish, or implement any “Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Center” (RSCC) or similar regional coordination entities.
(b)
Exclusion— The limitation contained in subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any RSCC or similar regional coordination entity authorized by statute, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations Headquarters authorized under section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2541).
(c)
Report— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report on the following:
(1)
A detailed description of the intent and purpose of the RSCC concept.
(2)
Defined and validated requirements justifying the establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each geographic combatant command, to include how such centers have been coordinated and de-conflicted with existing regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches.
(3)
An explanation of why existing regional centers and multilateral frameworks cannot satisfy the requirements and needs of the Department of Defense and geographic combatant commands.
(4)
Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program for such centers, to include estimates of contributions of nations participating in such centers.
(5)
Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State determines appropriate.
(d)
Specified congressional committees— The congressional committees referred to in subsection (c) are—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Sec. 1246 Additional reports on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

(a)
Report— Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking “November 1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,” and inserting “November 1, 2013, November 1, 2015, and November 1, 2017,”.
(b)
Update— Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:

“(c) Update—The Secretary of Defense shall revise or supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) if, in the Secretary’s estimation, interim events or developments occurring in a period between reports required under subsection (a) warrant revision or supplement.”

Sec. 1247 Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act

(a)
Appropriate congressional committees— Section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate” and inserting “the appropriate congressional committees”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) Appropriate congressional committees defined—In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—

“(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.”

(b)
Congressional briefing— Section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is further amended—
(1)
by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(2)
by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:

“(e) Congressional briefing—Not later than May 15 of each year, the President shall provide to such committees a briefing on such report.”

Sec. 1248 Limitation on funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to certain missile defense technology

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for each of the fiscal years 2014 through 2018 for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with access to information regarding—
(1)
missile defense technology of the United States relating to hit-to-kill technology; or
(2)
telemetry data with respect to missile defense interceptors or target vehicles.

Sec. 1249 Reports on actions to reduce support of ballistic missile programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea

(a)
Disclosure of and report on Russian support of ballistic missile programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea—
(1)
In general— The President shall seek to encourage the Government of the Russian Federation to disclose any support by the Russian Federation or Russian entities for the ballistic missile programs of the People’s Republic of China, Syria, Iran, or North Korea.
(2)
Report required— The President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a semi-annual report on any disclosure by the Government of the Russian Federation of any such support during the preceding six-month period.
(3)
Initial report— The initial report required by paragraph (2) shall be submitted not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and in addition to addressing any such support during the preceding six-month period shall also address any such support during the 10-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Cooperation of Russia and China to reduce technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile programs of Syria, Iran, North Korea, and other countries—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall develop a plan to seek and secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China to verifiably reduce the spread of technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile programs of the Syria, Iran, North Korea, or any other country that the Secretary of State determines has a ballistic missile program.
(2)
Report and briefings required— The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act a report describing the plan required in paragraph (1) and provide briefings to such committees annually thereafter until 2018 on the progress and results of these efforts.
(3)
Definition— In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A)
the congressional defense committees;
(B)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(C)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(c)
Form— Each report required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex, if necessary.

Sec. 1250 Congressional notifications relating to status of forces agreements

(a)
In general— With respect to an agreement on the status of forces between the United States and a foreign country, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days after the date on which the agreement is signed, renewed, amended or otherwise revised, or terminated.
(b)
Briefings required— Not later than February 1 of each calendar year, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the following:
(1)
Status of forces agreements that the United States will seek to enter into in such calendar year.
(2)
Status of forces agreements that have expired and which the United States will seek to renew in such calendar year.
(3)
Amendments to status of forces agreements that the Secretary of Defense determines to be substantial and are likely to be negotiated in such calendar year.
(c)
Appropriate congressional committees— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the congressional defense committees; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(d)
Effective date— This section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to an agreement described in subsection (a) that is signed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Sec. 1251 Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
The conflict in Syria began in March 2011.
(2)
As of February 2013, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights estimated that approximately 70,000 Syrians have been killed during the conflict.
(3)
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, over 1,200,000 Syrians are registered refugees or persons of concern including, over 66,000 in Egypt, over 145,000 in Iraq, over 461,000 in Jordan, over 462,000 in Lebanon, and over 329,000 in Turkey.
(4)
Jabhat al-Nusra, a group located in Syria and categorized as an affiliate of al-Qaeda by the intelligence community, presents a direct threat to the interests of the United States and could present a direct threat to the United States.
(5)
On August 19, 2011, President Obama stated: “The future of Syria must be determined by its people, but President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way. We have consistently said that President Assad must lead a democratic transition or get out of the way. He has not led. For the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President Assad to step aside.”.
(6)
The United States is deploying 200 military personnel from the headquarters of the 1st Armored Division to Jordan in order to “improve readiness and prepare for a number of scenarios”.
(7)
In a letter from Miguel Rodriguez, the Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs, to Senators McCain and Levin, dated April 25, 2013, it stated that “our intelligence community does assess with varying degrees of confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin * * * We do believe that any use of chemical weapons in Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad regime * * * the President has made it clear that the use of chemical weapons—or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups—is a red line for the United States of America”.
(8)
In a press conference with Israel Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama stated: “I have made clear that the use of chemical weapons is a game-changer”.
(9)
In August 2012, during a White House press conference, President Obama stated: “We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a redline for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.”.
(10)
It is a threat to the vital national security interest of the United States if terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda, obtain chemical or biological material or weapons in Syria.
(11)
At a Pentagon press conference on May 2, 2013, Secretary Hagel confirmed that the Obama Administration is re-thinking its opposition to arming the rebels.
(12)
On April 11, 2013, responding to a question about the need for a supplemental funding request for any potential United States military effort in Syria, Secretary Hagel stated: “Yes, I think it is pretty clear that a supplemental would be required.”.
(b)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
President Obama should have a comprehensive policy and should ensure robust contingency planning to secure United States’ interests in Syria;
(2)
President Obama should fully consider all courses of action to remove President Bashar al-Assad from power;
(3)
the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national security interests of Israel and the stability of Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey, the implications of which should be sufficiently weighed by the President when considering policy approaches towards the conflict in Syria;
(4)
the sale or transfer of advanced anti-aircraft weapons systems to Syria poses a grave risk to Israel and the United States supports Israel’s right to respond to this grave threat as needed;
(5)
the President should fully consider all courses of action to reinforce his stated “redline” regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction by the Assad regime in Syria, which could threaten the credibility of the United States with its allies in the region and embolden the Assad regime;
(6)
the United States should continue to conduct rigorous planning and operational preparation to support any efforts to secure the chemical and biological stockpiles and associated weapons;
(7)
the United States should have a policy that supports the stability of countries on Syria’s border, including Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel;
(8)
the United States should continue to support Syrian opposition forces with non-lethal aid;
(9)
the President, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the intelligence community, in cooperation with European and regional allies, should ensure that the risks of all courses of action or inaction regarding Syria are fully explored and understood and that Congress is kept fully informed of such risks;
(10)
the President should fully consider, and the Department of Defense should conduct prudent planning for, the provision of lethal aid and relevant operational training to vetted Syrian opposition forces, including an analysis of the risks of the provision of such aid and training;
(11)
should the President decide to employ any military assets in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental budget request to Congress; and
(12)
the President should use all diplomatic means to disrupt the flow of arms into Syria, including efforts to dissuade Russia from further arms sales with Syria, the influx of weapons and fighters from Hezbollah, and the infiltration of weapons and fighters from Iran.

Sec. 1252 Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations and related NATO agreements

(a)
Title 10, united states code— Section 2350d of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “NATO Maintenance and Supply Organization” each place it appears and inserting “NATO Support Organization and its executive agencies”;
(2)
in subsection (a)(1)—
(A)
by striking “Weapon System Partnership Agreements” and inserting “Support Partnership Agreements”; and
(B)
in subparagraph (B), by striking “a specific weapon system” and inserting “activities”; and
(3)
in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking “Weapon System Partnership Agreement” each place it appears and inserting “Support Partnership Agreement”.
(b)
Arms export control act— Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking “Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization” and inserting “North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive agencies”;
(2)
in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “weapon system partnership agreement” and inserting “support partnership agreement”; and
(3)
in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking “a specific weapon system” and inserting “activities”.

Sec. 1253 Limitation on funds to implement executive agreements relating to United States missile defense capabilities

(a)
Statement of policy— Congress reaffirms, with respect to executive agreements relating to the missile defense capabilities of the United States, including basing, locations, capabilities and numbers of missiles with respect to such missile defense capabilities, that section 303(b) of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b)) provides the following: “No action shall be taken pursuant to this or any other Act that would obligate the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in a militarily significant manner, except pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative legislation by the Congress of the United States.”.
(b)
Limitation on funds— None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be used—
(1)
to implement any executive agreement relating to the missile defense capabilities of the United States, including basing, locations, capabilities, and numbers of missiles with respect to such missile defense capabilities; or
(2)
to implement rules of engagement or Guidance for Employment of Force relating to such executive agreement.
(c)
Rule of construction— Subsection (b) shall not apply with respect to the use of funds to negotiate or implement any executive agreement with a country with respect to which the United States has entered into a treaty of alliance or has a security guarantee.
(d)
Executive agreement defined— In this section, the term “executive agreement” means an international agreement other than—
(1)
an agreement that is in the form of a treaty under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States; or
(2)
an agreement that requires implementing legislation to be enacted into law for the agreement to enter into force with respect to the United States.

Sec. 1254 Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization

(a)
In general— None of the funds made available for fiscal year 2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities may be obligated or expended for such purposes until the President certifies to Congress that no state party to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty has undertaken nuclear weapons test activities in fiscal year 2013 that are inconsistent with United States interpretations regarding obligations under such Treaty.
(b)
Lobbying or advocacy activities— None of the funds made available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions of the United States to the CTBTO entities may be used for lobbying or advocacy in the United States relating to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
(c)
CTBTO entities— In subsection (b), the term “CTBTO entities” means—
(1)
the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization International Monitoring System; and
(2)
the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions.

Sec. 1255 Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the United States and Burma

It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1)
as the United States policy rebalances towards Asia, it is critical that the United States military comprehensively evaluate its engagement with Burma;
(2)
the future of the military-to-military relationship between the United States and Burma should take into account the current ethnic conflict in Burma and persecution of ethnic and religious minorities;
(3)
while the United States has national security interests in Burma’s peace and stability, the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts with the ethnic minority groups requires the Burmese military to respect ceasefire agreements, laws of war, and human rights provisions; and
(4)
the Department of Defense should fully consider and assess the Burmese military’s efforts to implement reforms, end impunity for human rights abuses, and increase transparency and accountability before expanding military-to-military cooperation beyond initial dialogue and isolated engagements.

Sec. 1256 Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
During the past several years, over 700 kinetic terror incidents have occurred in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area of operations. Rising tensions in the region due to unemployment, fiscal insolvency, ethnic strife, hegemonic desires, and terrorism, pose risks to the security and stability of Europe.
(2)
Arab Spring uprisings in Middle Eastern and North African countries, including the Republic of Mali, the Arab Republic of Egypt, Libya, and the Syrian Arab Republic (Syria), have presented emerging strategic challenges that present significant implications for regional stability, the security of the State of Israel (Israel), and the national security interests of the United States and many European allies.
(3)
U.S. Africa Command does not have formally assigned Army or Marine Corps units assigned to it and it continues to share Air Force and Navy component commands with EUCOM. Consequently, United States forces stationed in Europe have been deployed to support contingencies associated with the Arab Spring in North Africa.
(4)
The Commander of U.S. European Command is responsible for developing operational plans for the defense of Israel. Moreover, forces stationed in Europe would be deployed to defend Israel in the event of such a contingency.
(5)
Regimes, including the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria, continue efforts to procure, develop, and proliferate advanced ballistic missile technologies that pose a serious threat to United States forces and installations in the theater, as well as to the territory, populations, and forces of Israel and European allies. United States missile defense capabilities in Europe seek to mitigate these threats.
(6)
Violent extremist organizations, including Kongra-Gel, al Qaida, Lebanese Hizballah, and Iranian Qods Force, may utilize Europe as an important venue for recruitment, logistical support, financing, and the targeting of the United States and Western interests.
(7)
Congress has lacked sufficient data to compare the strategic benefits and the costs associated with permanently stationing forces in Europe. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that the combatant commands do not completely and consistently report cost data in their theater posture plans. In particular, GAO reported in February 2011 that EUCOM lacks comprehensive cost data in its theater posture plans and therefore decision makers lack critical information that could be used to make fully informed posture decisions. Additionally, in June 2012, GAO found that the Department of Defense has taken steps to align posture initiatives with strategy and cost, but continues to lack comprehensive and consistent cost estimates of initiatives.
(8)
The Department of Defense has reported that the cost of permanently stationing forces in the United States rather than overseas is often offset by such factors as increased rotational costs.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
an enduring United States presence and engagement across Europe and Eurasia provides the critical access and infrastructure necessary to accomplish United States strategic priorities, expand United States global reach to Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa, as well as the Mediterranean and Atlantic Oceans, and facilitates a rapid United States response for complex contingencies;
(2)
the United States continues to have an interest in supporting the stability and security of Europe, especially in a dynamic and challenging global security environment;
(3)
forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-deployed rotational units, and reserve forces assigned to U.S. European Command remain essential for United States planning, logistics, and operations in support of U.S. Central Command, U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Transportation Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, and U.S. Strategic Command, as well as fulfilling commitments under Article V of the North Atlantic Charter;
(4)
in light of the benefits associated with defense of the homeland forward and strategic access, as well as the potential for rotational deployments to increase cost to the Department of Defense, the Department of Defense should implement the recommendations of the Government Accountability Office with regard to improved cost estimation to enable informed force posture decisions prior to making any further significant changes to the United States force posture in Europe that could increase risk for the United States; and
(5)
the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully and currently informed regarding the requirements of the United States force posture in Europe and the costs associated with maintaining such force.

Sec. 1257 Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s Republic of China

Congress—
(1)
notes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to rapidly modernize and expand its military capabilities across the land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace domains;
(2)
is concerned by the rate and scope of PRC military developments, including its military-focused cyber espionage, which indicate a desire to constrain or prevent the peaceful activities of the United States and its allies in the Western Pacific;
(3)
concurs with Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, that “China’s rapid development of advanced military capabilities, combined with its unclear intentions, certainly raises strategic and security concerns for the U.S. and the region”;
(4)
notes the United States remains committed to a robust forward military-presence in the Asia-Pacific and will continue to vigorously support mutual defense arrangements with treaty allies while also building deeper relationships with other strategic partners in the region; and
(5)
urges the Government of the PRC to work peacefully to resolve existing territorial disputes and to adopt a maritime code of conduct with relevant parties to guide all forms of maritime interaction and communications in the Asia-Pacific.

Sec. 1258 Rule of construction

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Syria or Iran.

Sec. 1259 Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should—
(1)
allow all high-level officials of Taiwan to enter into the United States or its embassies and consulates under conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the dignity of such leaders;
(2)
allow meetings between all high-level Taiwan and United States officials in United States executive departments;
(3)
allow the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office and all other instrumentalities established in the United States by Taiwan to conduct business activities, including activities which involve participation by Members of Congress and other representatives of Federal, State, and local governments, and all high-level Taiwan officials, without obstruction from the United States Government or any foreign power; and
(4)
adopt a policy of allowing high-ranking Taiwan leaders to make official visits with high-ranking officials of the United States, including official visits by Taiwan’s democratically elected president, and allowing for visits between these officials in Washington, D.C.

Sec. 1260 Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Hezbollah has been designated a foreign terrorist organization by the Department of State since October 8, 1997.
(2)
Hezbollah has been responsible for numerous terrorist attacks and attempted terrorist attacks around the world, including attacks against United States citizens.
(3)
Hezbollah is active in Europe and has been linked to a July 18, 2012, suicide bombing in Bulgaria which killed five people.
(4)
Hezbollah operatives have been captured around the world attacking or attempting to attack Western and Israeli targets.
(5)
The United States is working with its European allies to combat terrorism through a variety of means, including through NATO’s Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism and the Defence Against Terrorism Programme of Work.
(b)
Sense of Congress— It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the United States should continue to use all necessary means to fight against terrorism, including Hezbollah;
(2)
President Obama should strongly encourage his European counterparts to publicly condemn Hezbollah;
(3)
European allies should seek to officially recognize Hezbollah as a terrorist organization;
(4)
any attempt to distinguish between military and civilian wings in Hezbollah is meaningless; and
(5)
all countries should work together to fight radical terrorist organizations like Hezbollah.

Sec. 1261 Combating crime through intelligence capabilities

The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets, personnel, and resources to the Joint Interagency Task Force South, in coordination with SOUTHCOM, to combat the following by supplying sufficient intelligence capabilities:
(1)
Transnational criminal organizations.
(2)
Drug trafficking.
(3)
Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency.
(4)
Narco-terrorism.
(5)
Human trafficking.
(6)
The Iranian presence in the Western Hemisphere.

Sec. 1262 Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has been signed by the President, received the advice and consent of the Senate, and has been the subject of implementing legislation by the Congress.

Sec. 1263 War Powers of Congress

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
In 1793, George Washington said, “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”.
(2)
In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1798, James Madison wrote: “The constitution supposes, what the History of all Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to the Legislature.”
(3)
In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution which states in section 2: “The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”.
(4)
In its April 1, 2011, Memorandum to President Obama, the Office of Legal Counsel concluded: “President Obama could rely on his constitutional power to safeguard the national interest by directing the anticipated military operations in Libya—which were limited in their nature, scope, and duration—without prior congressional authorization.”.
(5)
On June 15, 2011, in a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives from the Department of Defense and Department of State, the Departments informed Congress that “The President is of the view that the current U.S. military operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers Resolution and do not under that law require further congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations are distinct from the kind of “hostilities contemplated by the Resolution’s 60 day termination provision”.”.
(6)
The precedence set by the Executive Branch in its assertion that Congress plays no role in military actions like those taken in Libya is contrary to the intent of the Framers and of the Constitution which vests sole authority to declare war in the Legislative Branch.
(b)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any use of military force.

Sec. 1264 Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens

(a)
Prohibition— The Department of Defense may not use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States.
(b)
Exception— The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to an individual who is actively engaged in combat against the United States.
(c)
Definition— In this section, the term drone means an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)).

Sec. 1265 Sale of F–16 aircraft to Taiwan

The President shall carry out the sale of no fewer than 66 F–16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan.

Sec. 1266 Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to self-defense

(a)
Findings— Congress makes the following findings:
(1)
The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel to self-defense.
(2)
The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) expressed the sense of Congress that the Government of the United States should transfer to the Government of Israel defense articles and defense services such as air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.
(3)
The inherent right of Israel to self-defense necessarily includes the possession and maintenance by Israel of an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests.
(b)
Policy of the united states— It is the policy of the United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests.
(c)
Sense of congress— It is the sense of Congress that air refueling tankers and advanced bunker-buster munitions should immediately be transferred to Israel to ensure our democratic ally has an independent capability to remove any existential threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program and defend its vital national interests.
(d)
Report— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the House and Senate Armed Services committees, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the House and Senate Appropriations committees a report that—
(1)
identifies all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-buster munitions, and other capabilities and platforms that would contribute significantly to the maintenance by Israel of a robust independent capability to remove existential security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests;
(2)
assesses the availability for sale or transfer of items necessary to acquire the capabilities and platforms described in paragraph (1) as well as the legal authorities available for making such transfers; and
(3)
describes the steps the President is taking to immediately transfer the items described in paragraph (1) pursuant to the policy described in subsection (b).

Sec. 1267 Report on collective and national security implications of central Asian and South Caucasus energy development

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
Assured access to stable energy supplies is an enduring concern of both the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
(2)
Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new NATO Strategic Concept declares that “[s]ome NATO countries will become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for their energy needs”.
(3)
The report required by section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) reaffirmed the Strategic Concept’s assessment of growing energy dependence of some members of the NATO alliance and also noted there is value in the assured access, protection, and delivery of energy.
(4)
Development of energy resources and transit routes in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea can diversify sources of supply for members of the NATO alliance, particularly those in Eastern Europe.
(b)
Report—
(1)
Report— Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on the implications of new energy resource development and distribution networks, both planned and under construction, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea for energy security strategies of the United States and NATO.
(2)
Elements— The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A)
An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution network.
(B)
An assessment of the potential of energy resources of the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea to mitigate such dependence on a single supplier or distribution network.
(C)
Recommendations, if any, for ways in which the United States can help support increased energy security for NATO members.
(3)
Submission of classified information— The report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(c)
Appropriate congressional committees defined— In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1268 Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation

(a)
Report— Not later than June 1, 2014, and June 1 of each year thereafter through 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the current and future military power of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as “Russia”). The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development of Russian security strategy and military strategy, and military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-year period following submission of such report.
(b)
Matters to be included— A report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)
An assessment of the security situation in regions neighboring Russia.
(2)
The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy and military strategy.
(3)
Trends in Russian security and military behavior that would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with, the goals described in paragraph (2).
(4)
An assessment of Russia’s global and regional security objectives, including objectives that would affect the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Middle East, and the People's Republic of China.
(5)
A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land, sea, and air forces.
(6)
Developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
(7)
An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
(8)
Developments in Russia’s asymmetric capabilities, including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy cyberwarfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and associated activities originating or suspected of originating from Russia.
(9)
The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional activities, the involvement of military and civilian organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies that would enhance Russian military capabilities.
(10)
Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military production capacities, and projections of its future arsenals.
(11)
A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial capabilities.
(12)
A description of Russia's command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for Russia's precision guided weapons.
(13)
In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
(14)
The current state of United States military-to-military contacts with the Russian Federation Armed Forces, which shall include the following:
(A)
A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy.
(B)
A summary of all such military-to-military contacts during the one-year period preceding the report, including a summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the Russian participants in those contacts.
(C)
A description of such military-to-military contacts scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and the plan for future contacts.
(D)
The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts.
(E)
The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts.
(F)
The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-military contacts fit into the larger security relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation.
(15)
A description of Russian military-to-military relationships with other countries, including the size and activity of military attaché offices around the world and military education programs conducted in Russia for other countries or in other countries for the Russians.
(16)
Other military and security developments involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to United States national security.
(c)
Definition— In this section the term “specified congressional committees” means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Sec. 1269 Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control items

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to provide tear gas or other riot control items to the government of a country undergoing a transition to democracy in the Middle East or North Africa unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that the security forces of such government are not using excessive force to repress peaceful, lawful, and organized dissent.

Sec. 1270 Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on measures to monitor and ensure that United States financial assistance to the Afghan National Security Forces to purchase fuel is not used to purchase fuel from Iran in violation of United States sanctions.

Sec. 1271 Israel’s right to self-defense

Congress fully supports Israel’s lawful exercise of self-defense, including actions to halt regional aggression.

Sec. 1272 Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation

(a)
Findings— Congress finds the following:
(1)
On May 14, 1948, the people of Israel proclaimed the establishment of the sovereign and independent State of Israel.
(2)
On March 28, 1949, the United States Government recognized the establishment of the new State of Israel and established full diplomatic relations.
(3)
Since its establishment nearly 65 years ago, the modern State of Israel has rebuilt a nation, forged a new and dynamic democratic society, and created a thriving economic, political, cultural, and intellectual life despite the heavy costs of war, terrorism, and unjustified diplomatic and economic boycotts against the people of Israel.
(4)
The people of Israel have established a vibrant, pluralistic, democratic political system, including freedom of speech, association, and religion; a vigorously free press; free, fair, and open elections; the rule of law; a fully independent judiciary; and other democratic principles and practices.
(5)
Since the 1979 revolution in Iran, the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly made threats against the existence of the State of Israel and sponsored acts of terrorism and violence against its citizens.
(6)
On October 27, 2005, President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for a world without America and Zionism.
(7)
In February 2012, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei said of Israel, “The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off. And it definitely will be cut off.”.
(8)
In August 2012, Supreme Leader Khamenei said of Israel, “This bogus and fake Zionist outgrowth will disappear off the landscape of geography.”.
(9)
In August 2012, President Ahmadinejad said that “in the new Middle East * * * there will be no trace of the American presence and the Zionists”;
(10)
The Department of State has designated the Islamic Republic of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and has characterized the Islamic Republic of Iran as the “most active state sponsor of terrorism” in the world.
(11)
The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hizballah, and Shiite militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murder of hundreds of United States service members and innocent civilians.
(12)
The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has provided weapons, training, and funding to the regime of Bashar al Assad that has been used to suppress and murder its own people.
(13)
Since at least the late 1980s, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to acquire a nuclear weapons capability.
(14)
Since September 2005, the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found the Islamic Republic of Iran to be in non-compliance with its safeguards agreement with the IAEA, which Iran is obligated to undertake as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force March 5, 1970 (NPT).
(15)
The United Nations Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran its full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and its full cooperation with the IAEA on all outstanding issues related to its nuclear activities, particularly those concerning the possible military dimensions of its nuclear program.
(16)
The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has refused to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions or to fully cooperate with the IAEA.
(17)
In November 2011, the IAEA Director General issued a report that documented “serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme”, and affirmed that information available to the IAEA indicates that “Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device” and that some activities may be ongoing.
(18)
The Government of Iran stands in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for denying its citizens basic freedoms, including the freedoms of expression, religion, peaceful assembly and movement, and for flagrantly abusing the rights of minorities and women.
(19)
In his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012, President Barack Obama stated, “Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.”.
(20)
Congress has passed and the President has signed into law legislation imposing significant economic and diplomatic sanctions on Iran to encourage the Government of Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and end its support for terrorism.
(21)
These sanctions, while having significant effect, have yet to persuade Iran to abandon its illicit pursuits and comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions.
(22)
More stringent enforcement of sanctions legislation, including elements targeting oil exports and access to foreign exchange, could still lead the Government of Iran to change course.
(23)
In his State of the Union Address on February 12, 2013, President Obama reiterated, “The leaders of Iran must recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet their obligations. And we will do what is necessary to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon.”.
(24)
On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, “Iran's leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”.
(25)
On October 22, 2012, President Obama said of Iran, “The clock is ticking * * * And we're going to make sure that if they do not meet the demands of the international community, then we are going to take all options necessary to make sure they don't have a nuclear weapon.”.
(26)
On May 19, 2011, President Obama stated, “Every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat.”.
(27)
On September 21, 2011, President Obama stated, “America's commitment to Israel's security is unshakeable. Our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring.”.
(28)
On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, “And whenever an effort is made to delegitimize the state of Israel, my administration has opposed them. So there should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel's back.”.
(29)
On October 22, 2012, President Obama stated, “Israel is a true friend. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I've made that clear throughout my presidency * * * I will stand with Israel if they are attacked.”.
(30)
In December 2012, 74 United States Senators wrote to President Obama “As you begin your second term as President, we ask you to reiterate your readiness to take military action against Iran if it continues its efforts to acquire a nuclear weapon. In addition, we urge you to work with our European and Middle Eastern allies to demonstrate to the Iranians that a credible and capable multilateral coalition exists that would support a military strike if, in the end, this is unfortunately necessary.”.
(31)
The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–150) stated that it is United States policy to support Israel’s inherent right to self-defense.
(b)
Sense of Congress— Congress—
(1)
reaffirms the special bonds of friendship and cooperation that have existed between the United States and the State of Israel for more than sixty years and that enjoy overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and among the people of the United States;
(2)
strongly supports the close military, intelligence, and security cooperation that President Obama has pursued with Israel and urges this cooperation to continue and deepen;
(3)
deplores and condemns, in the strongest possible terms, the reprehensible statements and policies of the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran threatening the security and existence of Israel;
(4)
recognizes the tremendous threat posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by the Government of Iran’s continuing pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability;
(5)
reiterates that the policy of the United States is to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability and to take such action as may be necessary to implement this policy;
(6)
reaffirms its strong support for the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urges the President to continue and strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation;
(7)
declares that the United States has a vital national interest in, and unbreakable commitment to, ensuring the existence, survival, and security of the State of Israel, and reaffirms United States support for Israel’s right to self-defense; and
(8)
urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.
(c)
Rule of construction— Nothing in this section shall be construed as an authorization for the use of force or a declaration of war.

Sec. 1273 Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran and North Korea

It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
the paramount security concern of the United States is the ongoing and illegal nuclear weapons programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea;
(2)
it should be the primary objective of the President of the United States to ensure that North Korea’s nuclear program is completely and verifiably eliminated and that Iran, and its terrorist proxies, are not allowed to develop nuclear weapons capability and the means to deliver them;
(3)
the continuing failure to compel Iran and North Korea to comply with their respective obligations under international law risks greater nuclear proliferation throughout already unstable regions by states that have chosen, but not irreversibly so, to refrain from developing or acquiring their own nuclear weapons capability;
(4)
nuclear arms reductions by the United States and the Russian Federation have not persuaded or otherwise incentivized Iran and North Korea to halt or reverse their destabilizing and dangerous nuclear weapons programs, nor have they resulted in increased cooperation by other states to deal with these threats; and
(5)
the President should use all international fora available to the President to pursue the complete and verifiable elimination of the nuclear weapons programs of Iran and North Korea as the President’s paramount obligation to the security of the American people.

Sec. 1274 Limitation on use of funds to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport

(a)
Limitation— No funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2013 may be used for the purchase of any equipment from Rosoboronexport until the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that, to the best of the Secretary's knowledge—
(1)
Rosoboronexport is cooperating fully with the Defense Contract Audit Agency;
(2)
Rosoboronexport has not delivered S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles to Syria; and
(3)
no new contracts have been signed between the Bashar al Assad regime in Syria and Rosoboronexport since January 1, 2013.
(b)
National security waiver—
(1)
In general— The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if the Secretary certifies that the waiver in order to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport is in national security interest of the United States.
(2)
Report— If the Secretary waives the limitation in subsection (a) pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 30 days before purchasing equipment from Rosoboronexport pursuant to the waiver, a report on the waiver. The report shall be submitted in classified or unclassified form, at the election of the Secretary. The report shall include the following:
(A)
An explanation why it is in the national security interest of the United States to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport.
(B)
An explanation why comparable equipment cannot be purchased from another corporation.
(C)
An assessment of the cooperation of Rosoboronexport with the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
(D)
An assessment of whether and how many S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles have been delivered to the Assad regime by Rosoboronexport.
(E)
A list of the contracts that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad regime since January 1, 2013.
(c)
Requirement for competitively bid contracts— The Secretary of Defense shall award any contract that will use United States funds for the procurement of helicopters for the Afghan Security Forces using competitive procedures based on requirements developed by the Secretary of Defense.

XIII Cooperative Threat Reduction

Sec. 1301 Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds

(a)
Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs— For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(b)
Fiscal year 2014 cooperative threat reduction funds defined— As used in this title, the term “fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
(c)
Availability of funds— Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.

Sec. 1302 Funding allocations

(a)
Funding for specific purposes— Of the $528,455,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
(1)
For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,655,000.
(2)
For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000.
(3)
For global nuclear security, $32,793,000.
(4)
For cooperative biological engagement, $293,142,110.
(5)
For proliferation prevention, $149,314,890.
(6)
For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000.
(7)
For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $28,175,000.
(b)
Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposes— No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law.
(c)
Limited authority to vary individual amounts—
(1)
In general— Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose.
(2)
Notice-and-wait required— An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after—
(A)
the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and
(B)
15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification.

Sec. 1303 Extension for use of contributions to the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program

Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note) is amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2018”.

Sec. 1304 Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region

(a)
Strategy required— The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad nonproliferation strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and advance cooperative efforts with international partners to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region.
(b)
Elements— The strategy required by subsection (a) shall—
(1)
build upon the current activities of the Departments of Defense, State, and Energy’s nonproliferation programs that aim to mitigate the range of threats in the Middle East and North Africa region posed by weapons of mass destruction;
(2)
review issues relating to the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region on a regional basis as well as on a country-by-country basis;
(3)
review the activities and achievements in the Middle East and North Africa region of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program and the nonproliferation programs at the Department of State and Department of Energy and other United States Government agencies and departments designed to address nuclear, radiological, chemical, and biological safety and security issues;
(4)
ensure the continued coordination of cooperative nonproliferation efforts within the United States Government and further mobilize and leverage additional resources from partner nations, nongovernmental and multilateral organizations, and international institutions;
(5)
include an assessment of what countries are financially, materially, or technologically supporting proliferation in this region and how the strategy will prevent, stop or interdict the support;
(6)
include an estimate of associated costs required to plan and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction activities in order to execute the comprehensive strategy to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials; and
(7)
include a discussion of the metrics to measure the strategy’s and activities’ success in reducing the regional threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
(c)
Integration and coordination— The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of gaps in current cooperative nonproliferation efforts, an articulation of agencies’ threat reduction priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region, the establishment of appropriate metrics for determining success in the region, and steps to ensure that the strategy fits in broader United States efforts to reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction.
(d)
Consultation— In establishing the strategy required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may consult with both governmental and nongovernmental experts from a diverse set of views.
(e)
Strategy and implementation plan— Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees the cooperative threat reduction modernization strategy required by subsection (a), as well as a plan for the implementation of the strategy required by subsection (a).
(f)
Form— The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(g)
Specified congressional committees— In this section, the term specific congressional committees means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

XIV Other Authorizations

A Military Programs

Sec. 1401 Working capital funds

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1402 National defense sealift fund

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1403 Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

(a)
Authorization of appropriations— Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b)
Use— Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1)
the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2)
the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

Sec. 1404 Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1405 Defense Inspector General

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

Sec. 1406 Defense Health Program

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.

B National Defense Stockpile

Sec. 1411 Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and critical materials supply

(a)
Presidential responsibility for conservation of stockpile materials— Section 98e(a) of title 50, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5):

“(5) provide for the recovery of any strategic and critical material from excess materials made available for recovery purposes by other Federal agencies;”

(b)
Uses of National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund— Section 98h(b)(2) of title 50, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph (D):

“(D) Encouraging the conservation of strategic and critical materials.”

(c)
Development of domestic sources— Section 98h–6(a) of title 50, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “and conservation” after “development”.

Sec. 1412 Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile

(a)
Acquisition authority— Using funds available in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States:
(1)
Ferroniobium.
(2)
Dysprosium Metal.
(3)
Yttrium Oxide.
(4)
Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials.
(5)
Lithium Ion Precursors.
(6)
Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive Molding Powders.
(b)
Amount of authority— The National Defense Stockpile Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified in subsection (a).
(c)
Fiscal year limitation— The authority under this section is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019.

C Other Matters

Sec. 1421 Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois

(a)
Authority for transfer of funds— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 507 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b)
Use of transferred funds— For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

Sec. 1422 Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

Sec. 1423 Cemeterial expenses

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses, not otherwise provided for, in the amount of $45,800,000.

XV Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations

A Authorization of Additional Appropriations

Sec. 1501 Purpose

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.

Sec. 1502 Procurement

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102.

Sec. 1503 Research, development, test, and evaluation

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.

Sec. 1504 Operation and maintenance

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302.

Sec. 1505 Military personnel

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402.

Sec. 1506 Working capital funds

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

Sec. 1507 Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

Sec. 1508 Defense Inspector General

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

Sec. 1509 Defense Health Program

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

B Financial Matters

Sec. 1521 Treatment as additional authorizations

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.

Sec. 1522 Special transfer authority

(a)
Authority To Transfer Authorizations—
(1)
Authority— Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(2)
Limitation— The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000.
(b)
Terms and Conditions— Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.
(c)
Additional Authority— The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

C Limitations and Other Matters

Sec. 1531 Afghanistan Security Forces Fund

(a)
Continuation of existing limitations on use of funds in Fund— Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b)
Revision of Plan for Use of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund—
(1)
Revision and Purpose— The Secretary of Defense shall revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure that an office or official of the Department of Defense is identified as responsible for each program or activity supported using funds available to the Department of Defense through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
(2)
Submission— Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional committees the plan as revised pursuant to paragraph (1).
(c)
Promotion of recruitment and retention of women— Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014, no less than $47,300,000 shall be used for the recruitment and retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces. This requirement does not modify the distribution of funds for programs and activities supported using the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, but will ensure attention to recruitment and retention of women within each program and activity.

Sec. 1532 Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization

(a)
Report required— Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the future plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).
(b)
Required elements— The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
An analysis of alternatives considered in determining the future plans for JIEDDO.
(2)
If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue JIEDDO—
(A)
a description of how JIEDDO’s major programs and capabilities will be integrated into other components within the Department of Defense or discontinued; and
(B)
a statement of the estimated costs to other components of the Department for any JIEDDO programs and capabilities that are reassigned to such components.
(3)
If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO—
(A)
a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO;
(B)
a description of the expected organizational structure for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and lines of authority within the Department and personnel strength, including contractors; and
(C)
a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission of JIEDDO and its organizational structure.
(4)
A timeline for implementation of the selected alternative described in paragraph (2) or (3).
(5)
A description on how the Department will identify and incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing JIEDDO and its programs.

Sec. 1533 Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass

None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in the funding table in section 4302, may be obligated or expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on Operation Observant Compass, including the specific goals of the campaign to counter the Lord Resistance Army, the precise metrics used to measure progress in such campaign, and the required steps that will be taken to transition such campaign if it is determined that it is no longer necessary for the United States to support the mission of such campaign.

Sec. 1534 Report on United States force levels and costs of military operations in Afghanistan

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate a report on the following:
(1)
The estimated United States force levels in Afghanistan for each of years 2015 through 2020.
(2)
The estimated costs of United States military operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020.

Sec. 1535 Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment

(a)
Limitation— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF), $2,600,000,000 shall be withheld from obligation and expenditure until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report as described in subsection (b).
(b)
Report— The report referred to in subsection (a) is a report that includes the following information:
(1)
A list of all covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment to be purchased with funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to the Department of Defense for the ASFF.
(2)
The expected date on which such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment would be delivered and operable in Afghanistan.
(3)
The full requirements for operating such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment.
(4)
The plan for maintenance of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment and estimated costs of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment by year, through 2020.
(5)
The expected date that ASFF personnel would be fully capable of operating and maintaining such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment without support from United States personnel.
(6)
An explanation of the extent to which the acquisition of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment will impact the longer-term United States costs of supporting the ASFF.
(c)
Covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment— In this section, the term “covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment” means helicopters, systems for close air support, air mobility systems, and armored vehicles.

XVI Industrial Base Matters

Sec. 1601 Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense

(a)
Requirement for periodic audits of contracting compliance— The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct periodic audits of contracting practices and policies related to procurement under section 2533a of title 10, United States Code. Such an audit shall be conducted at least once every three years.
(b)
Requirement for additional information in semiannual reports— The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall ensure that findings and other information resulting from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included in the semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees under section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).

Sec. 1602 Expansion of the procurement technical assistance program to advance small business growth

(a)
Advancing small business growth—
(1)
In general— Chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and
(B)
by inserting after section 2418 the following new section 2419:

“2419. Advancing small business growth

“(a) Identification of recommended business capabilities and characteristics

“(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall publish in the Federal Register and on the website of the Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of Defense a list of capabilities and characteristics recommended for the successful transition of a qualified small business concern to become competitive as an other-than-small business for contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. The capabilities and characteristics on the list shall be set forth by North American Industry Classification System sector.

“(2) The list shall be reviewed and updated appropriately on an annual basis.

“(b) Contract clause required

“(1) The Under Secretary shall require the clause described in paragraph (2) to be included in each covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense.

“(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that—

“(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that acceptance of the contract may cause the business to exceed the applicable small business size standards (established pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the industry concerned and that the contractor may no longer qualify as a small business concern for that industry; and

“(B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and characteristics identified in the list required by subsection (a) if the contractor intends to remain competitive as an other-than-small business in that industry.

“(c) Assistance for advancing certain small businesses—Eligible small businesses may be provided specific assistance with developing the capabilities and characteristics identified in the list required by subsection (a), as part of any procurement technical assistance furnished pursuant to this chapter.

“(d) Definitions—In this section:

“(1) The term “covered contract” means a contract—

“(A) awarded to a qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act; and

“(B) with an estimated annual value—

“(i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based small business size standard; or

“(ii) if the contract is in an industry with an employee-based size standard, that will exceed $70,000,000.

“(2) The term “eligible small business” means a qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract with the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause described in subsection (b)(2).”

(2)
Clerical amendment— The table of sections as the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 2419 and inserting the following:
(b)
Exception to limitation on funding— Section 2414 of such title is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking “The value” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (c), the value”; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new subsection (c):

“(c) Exception—The value of the assistance provided in accordance with section 2419(c) of this title is not subject to the limitations in subsection (a).”

(c)
Revisions to cooperative agreements—
(1)
Full funding allowed for certain assistance— Section 2413(b) of such title is amended—
(A)
by striking “except that in the case” and inserting:

“(1) in the case”

(B)
by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity that provides specific assistance for eligible small businesses pursuant to section 2419(c) of this title, the Secretary may agree to furnish the full cost of such assistance.”

(2)
Additional considerations— Section 2413 of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under an agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consider the forecast by the eligible entity of demand for procurement technical assistance, and, in the case of an established program under this chapter, the outlays and receipts of such program during prior years of operation.”

(3)
Conforming amendment— Section 2413(d) of such title is amended by striking “and in determining the level of funding to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),”.
(d)
Report required— Not later than March 15 of 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the amendments made by this section, along with any recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.

Sec. 1603 Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program

(a)
Increase in Government share— Section 2413(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking “one-half” both places it appears and inserting “65 percent”; and
(2)
by striking “three-fourths” and inserting “75 percent”.
(b)
Increase in limitations on value of assistance— Section 2414(a) of such title is amended—
(1)
in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking “$600,000” and inserting “$750,000”;
(2)
in paragraph (2), by striking “$300,000” and inserting “$450,000”; and
(3)
in paragraph (3), by striking “$150,000” and inserting “$300,000”.

Sec. 1604 Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat

(a)
Limitation; strategic plan— The Administrator of the Defense Logistics Agency may not make any reductions in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat until the Administrator and the heads of the military services, in consultation with manufacturers of meals ready-to-eat, develop a comprehensive strategic plan to address—
(1)
the aggregate meals ready-to-eat requirements for each of the military departments;
(2)
industrial base sustainment and war-time surge capacity requirements for meals ready-to-eat; and
(3)
timely rotation of the war reserves of meals-ready-to-eat.
(b)
Briefing required— The Administrator shall brief the congressional defense committees on the strategic plan developed under subsection (a) before making any reductions in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat.

Sec. 1605 Foreign commercial satellite services

(a)
In general— Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 911(b) of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“2279. Foreign commercial satellite services

“(a) Prohibition—The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for satellite services with a foreign entity if—

“(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the government of a covered foreign country has an ownership interest; or

“(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide launch or other satellite services under the contract from a covered foreign country.

“(b) Waiver—The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) for a particular contract if the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, submits to the congressional defense committees a national security assessment for such contract that includes the following:

“(1) The projected period of performance (including any period covered by options to extend the contract), the financial terms, and a description of the services to be provided under the contract.

“(2) To the extent practicable, a description of the ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in the foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department of Defense under the contract and the launch or other satellite services that will be provided in a covered foreign country under the contract.

“(3) A justification for entering into a contract with such foreign entity and a description of the actions necessary to eliminate the need to enter into such a contract with such foreign entity in the future.

“(4) A risk assessment of entering into a contract with such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission assurance and security of information and a description of any measures necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk assessment.

“(c) Delegation of waiver authority—The Secretary of Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b) to waive subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and such authority may not be further delegated.

“(d) Form of waiver assessments—Each assessment under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

“(e) Covered foreign country defined—In this section, the term “covered foreign country” means a country described in section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2019).”

(b)
Table of sections amendment— The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(c) of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following item:

Sec. 1606 Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program

(a)
Pilot Program— The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall establish and implement a pilot program, to be known as the “Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program”, in accordance with this section.
(b)
Purpose— The purpose of the pilot program is to accelerate the commercialization of basic research innovations from qualifying institutions.
(c)
Awards—
(1)
In general— Under the pilot program, the Secretary shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in accordance with this subsection.
(2)
Competitive, merit-based process— An award under the pilot program shall be made using a competitive, merit-based process.
(3)
Eligibility— A qualifying institution shall be eligible for an award under the pilot program if the institution agrees to—
(A)
use funds from the award for the uses specified in paragraph (5); and
(B)
oversee the use of the funds through—
(i)
a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of experts in translational and proof of concept research, including industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, and business experts and university technology transfer officials;
(ii)
technology validation milestones focused on market feasibility;
(iii)
simple reporting on program progress; and
(iv)
a process to reallocate funding from poor performing projects to those with more potential.
(4)
Criteria— An award may be made under the pilot program to a qualifying institution in accordance with the following criteria:
(A)
The extent to which a qualifying institution—
(i)
has an established and proven technology transfer or commercialization office and has a plan for engaging that office in the program’s implementation or has outlined an innovative approach to technology transfer that has the potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer outcomes and can be adopted by other qualifying institutions;
(ii)
can assemble a project management board comprised of industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, and business experts;
(iii)
has an intellectual property rights strategy or office; and
(iv)
demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond the duration of the funding from the award.
(B)
Such other criteria as the Secretary determines necessary.
(5)
Use of award—
(A)
In general— Subject to subparagraph (B), the funds from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial potential of existing discoveries, including activities that contribute to determining a project’s commercialization path, including technical validations, market research, clarifying intellectual property rights, and investigating commercial and business opportunities.
(B)
Limitations—
(i)
The amount of an award may not exceed $500,000 a year.
(ii)
Funds from an award may not be used for basic research, or to fund the acquisition of research equipment or supplies unrelated to commercialization activities.
(d)
Report— Not later than one year after the establishment of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. The report shall include—
(1)
a detailed description of the pilot program, including incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts;
(2)
an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program;
(3)
a detailed description of the institutional selection process;
(4)
a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot program; and
(5)
an analysis of the program’s effectiveness, with data supporting the analysis.
(e)
Qualifying institution defined— In this section, the term “qualifying institution” means a nonprofit institution, as defined in section 4(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)), or a Federal laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(4)).
(f)
Termination— The pilot program conducted under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018.

Sec. 1607 Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns

Subsection (h) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended to read as follows:

“(h) Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns

“(1) Agency reports—At the conclusion of each fiscal year, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the Administrator a report describing—

“(A) the extent of the participation by small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans (including service-disabled veterans), qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women in the procurement contracts of such agency during such fiscal year;

“(B) whether the agency achieved the goals established for the agency under subsection (g)(2) with respect to such fiscal year;

“(C) any justifications for a failure to achieve such goals; and

“(D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices to better meet such goals, including analysis of factors leading to any failure to achieve such goals.

“(2) Reports by administrator—Not later than 60 days after receiving a report from each Federal agency under paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year, the Administrator shall submit to the President and Congress, and to make available on a public Web site, an annual report that includes—

“(A) a copy of each report submitted to the Administrator under paragraph (1);

“(B) a determination of whether each goal established by the President under subsection (g)(1) for such fiscal year was achieved;

“(C) a determination of whether each goal established by the head of a Federal agency under subsection (g)(2) for such fiscal year was achieved;

“(D) the reasons for any failure to achieve a goal established under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g) for such fiscal year and a description of actions planned by the applicable agency to address such failure, including the Administrator’s comments and recommendations on the proposed remediation plan; and

“(E) for the Federal Government and each Federal agency, an analysis of the number and dollar amount of prime contracts awarded during such fiscal year to—

“(i) small business concerns—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; and

“(IV) through unrestricted competition;

“(ii) small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans; and

“(V) through unrestricted competition;

“(iii) qualified HUBZone small business concerns—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to qualified HUBZone small business concerns;

“(V) through unrestricted competition where a price evaluation preference was used; and

“(VI) through unrestricted competition where a price evaluation preference was not used;

“(iv) small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals;

“(V) through unrestricted competition; and

“(VI) by reason of that concern’s certification as a small business owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals;

“(v) small business concerns owned by an Indian tribe (as such term is defined in section 8(a)(13)) other than an Alaska Native Corporation—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and

“(V) through unrestricted competition;

“(vi) small business concerns owned by a Native Hawaiian Organization—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and

“(V) through unrestricted competition;

“(vii) small business concerns owned by an Alaska Native Corporation—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through sole source contracts;

“(III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and

“(V) through unrestricted competition; and

“(viii) small business concerns owned and controlled by women—

“(I) in the aggregate;

“(II) through competitions restricted to small business concerns;

“(III) through competitions restricted using the authority under section 8(m)(2);

“(IV) through competitions restricted using the authority under section 8(m)(2) and in which the waiver authority under section 8(m)(3) was used; and

“(V) through unrestricted competition; and

“(F) for the Federal Government, the number, dollar amount, and distribution with respect to the North American Industry Classification System of subcontracts awarded during such fiscal year to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women, provided that such information is publicly available through data systems developed pursuant to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–282), or otherwise available as provided in paragraph (3).

“(3) Access to data

“(A) Federal procurement data system—To assist in the implementation of this section, the Administration shall have access to information collected through the Federal Procurement Data System, Federal Subcontracting Reporting System, or any new or successor system.

“(B) Agency procurement data sources—To assist in the implementation of this section, the head of each contracting agency shall provide, upon request of the Administration, procurement information collected through agency data collection sources in existence at the time of the request. Contracting agencies shall not be required to establish new data collection systems to provide such data.”

Sec. 1608 Program to provide Federal contracts to early stage small businesses

(a)
In general— The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“48. Program to provide Federal contracts to early stage small businesses

“(a) Establishment—The Administrator shall establish and carry out a program in accordance with the requirements of this section to provide improved access to Federal contract opportunities for early stage small business concerns.

“(b) Procurement contracts

“(1) In general—In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall identify procurement contracts of Federal agencies for award under the program.

“(2) Contract awards—Under the program established pursuant to this section, the award of a procurement contract of a Federal agency identified by the Administrator pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be made by the agency to an eligible program participant selected, and determined to be responsible, by the agency.

“(3) Competition

“(A) Sole source—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this program if such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of such contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more early stage small business concerns will submit offers for the contracting opportunity and in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.

“(B) restricted competition—A contracting officer may award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to early stage small business concerns if the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that not less than 2 early stage small business concerns will submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair market price.

“(4) Contract value—Contracts shall be awarded under this program if its value is greater than $3,000 and less than half the upper threshold of section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act.

“(c) Eligibility—Only an early stage small business concern shall be eligible to compete for a contract to be awarded under the program. The Administrator shall certify that a small business concern is an early stage small business concern, or the Administrator shall approve a Federal agency, a State government, or a national certifying entity to certify that the business meets the eligibility criteria of an early stage small business concern.

“(d) Technical assistance—The Administrator shall provide early stage small business concerns with technical assistance and counseling with regard to—

“(1) applying for and competing for Federal contracts; and

“(2) fulfilling the administrative responsibilities associated with the performance of a Federal contract.

“(e) Attainment of contract goals—All contract awards made under the program shall be counted toward the attainment of the goals specified in section 15(g) of the Small Business Act.

“(f) Regulations—The Administrator shall—

“(1) issue proposed regulations to carry out this section not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act; and

“(2) issue final regulations to carry out this section not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

“(g) Report to congress—Not later than April 30, 2015, the Administrator shall transmit to the Congress a report on the performance of the program.

“(h) Definitions—For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

“(1) Program—The term program means a program established pursuant to subsection (a).

“(2) Early stage small business concern—The term early stage small business concern means a small business concern that—

“(A) has not more than 15 employees; and

“(B) has average annual receipts that total not more than $1,000,000, except if the concern is in an industry with an average annual revenue standard that is less than $1,000,000, as defined by the North American Industry Classification System.”

(b)
Repeal of similar program— Section 304 of the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 644 note) is repealed.

Sec. 1609 Credit for certain subcontractors

(a)
In general— Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(16) Credit for certain subcontractor—For purposes of determining whether or not a prime contractor has attained the percentage goals specified in paragraph (6)—

“(A) if the subcontracting goals pertain only to a single contract with the executive agency, the prime contractor shall receive credit for small business concerns performing as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors at any tier pursuant to the subcontracting plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an amount equal to the dollar value of work awarded to such small business concerns; and

“(B) if the subcontracting goals pertain to more than one contract with one or more executive agencies, or to one contract with more than one executive agency, the prime contractor may only count first tier subcontractors that are small business concerns.”

(b)
Definitions pertaining to subcontracting— Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(dd) Definitions pertaining to subcontracting—In this Act:

“(1) Subcontract—The term “subcontract” means a legally binding agreement between a contractor that is already under contract to another party to perform work, and a third party, hereinafter referred to as the subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part, or all, of the work that the contractor has undertaken.

“(2) First tier subcontractor—The term “first tier subcontractor” means a subcontractor who has a subcontract directly with the prime contractor.

“(3) At any tier—The term “at any tier” means any subcontractor other than a subcontractor who is a first tier subcontractor.”

Sec. 1610 GAO Study on subcontracting reporting systems

Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report studying the feasibility of using Federal subcontracting reporting systems, including the Federal subaward reporting system required by section 2 of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 and any electronic subcontracting reporting award system used by the Small Business Administration, to attribute subcontractors to particular contracts in the case of contractors that have subcontracting plans under section 8(d) of the Small Business Act that pertain to multiple contracts with executive agencies.

Sec. 1611 Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts

In the case of a contract to which the provisions of section 46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s) apply, the requirements under section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 do not apply.